Skip to content
  1. Apr 23, 2024
  2. Apr 22, 2024
  3. Apr 16, 2024
  4. Apr 12, 2024
  5. Apr 10, 2024
  6. Apr 09, 2024
  7. Apr 05, 2024
  8. Apr 04, 2024
    • Michal Kucharczyk's avatar
      `GenesisConfig` presets for runtime (#2714) · f910a15c
      Michal Kucharczyk authored
      The runtime now can provide a number of predefined presets of
      `RuntimeGenesisConfig` struct. This presets are intended to be used in
      different deployments, e.g.: `local`, `staging`, etc, and should be
      included into the corresponding chain-specs.
      
      Having `GenesisConfig` presets in runtime allows to fully decouple node
      from runtime types (the problem is described in #1984).
      
      **Summary of changes:**
      - The `GenesisBuilder` API was adjusted to enable this functionality
      (and provide better naming - #150):
         ```rust
          fn preset_names() -> Vec<PresetId>;
      fn get_preset(id: Option<PresetId>) -> Option<serde_json::Value>;
      //`None` means default
          fn build_state(value: serde_json::Value);
          pub struct PresetId(Vec<u8>);
         ```
      
      - **Breaking change**: Old `create_default_config` method was removed,
      `build_config` was renamed to `build_state`. As a consequence a node
      won't be able to interact with genesis config for older runtimes. The
      cleanup was made for sake of API simplicity. Also IMO maintaining
      compatibility with old API is not so crucial.
      - Reference implementation was provided for `substrate-test-runtime` and
      `rococo` runtimes. For rococo new
      [`genesis_configs_presets`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/3b41d66b/polkadot/runtime/rococo/src/genesis_config_presets.rs#L530)
      module was added and is used in `GenesisBuilder`
      [_presets-related_](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/3b41d66b/polkadot/runtime/rococo/src/lib.rs#L2462-L2485)
      methods.
      
      - The `chain-spec-builder` util was also improved and allows to
      ([_doc_](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/3b41d66b/substrate/bin/utils/chain-spec-builder/src/lib.rs#L19)):
         - list presets provided by given runtime (`list-presets`),
      - display preset or default config provided by the runtime
      (`display-preset`),
         - build chain-spec using named preset (`create ... named-preset`),
      
      
      - The `ChainSpecBuilder` is extended with
      [`with_genesis_config_preset_name`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/3b41d66b/substrate/client/chain-spec/src/chain_spec.rs#L447)
      method which allows to build chain-spec using named preset provided by
      the runtime. Sample usage on the node side
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/2caffaae
      
      /polkadot/node/service/src/chain_spec.rs#L404).
      
      Implementation of #1984.
      fixes: #150
      part of: #25
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarSebastian Kunert <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarKian Paimani <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      f910a15c
    • Liam Aharon's avatar
      Migrate fee payment from `Currency` to `fungible` (#2292) · bda4e75a
      Liam Aharon authored
      Part of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/226 
      Related https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1833
      
      - Deprecate `CurrencyAdapter` and introduce `FungibleAdapter`
      - Deprecate `ToStakingPot` and replace usage with `ResolveTo`
      - Required creating a new `StakingPotAccountId` struct that implements
      `TypedGet` for the staking pot account ID
      - Update parachain common utils `DealWithFees`, `ToAuthor` and
      `AssetsToBlockAuthor` implementations to use `fungible`
      - Update runtime XCM Weight Traders to use `ResolveTo` instead of
      `ToStakingPot`
      - Update runtime Transaction Payment pallets to use `FungibleAdapter`
      instead of `CurrencyAdapter`
      - [x] Blocked by https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1296,
      needs the `Unbalanced::decrease_balance` fix
      bda4e75a
  9. Apr 01, 2024
    • s0me0ne-unkn0wn's avatar
      `im-online` removal final cleanup (#3902) · 52e10378
      s0me0ne-unkn0wn authored
      Rejoice! Rejoice! The story is nearly over.
      
      This PR removes stale migrations, auxiliary structures, and package
      dependencies, thus making Rococo and Westend totally free from any
      `im-online`-related stuff.
      
      `im-online` still stays a part of the Substrate node and its runtime:
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/0d932484/substrate/bin/node/runtime/src/lib.rs#L2276-L2277
      I'm not sure if it makes sense to remove it from there considering that
      we're not removing `im-online` from FRAME. Please share your opinion.
      52e10378
    • Alexandru Gheorghe's avatar
      primitives: Move out of staging released APIs (#3925) · d6f68bb9
      Alexandru Gheorghe authored
      
      
      Runtime release 1.2 includes bumping of the ParachainHost APIs up to
      v10, so let's move all the released APIs out of vstaging folder, this PR
      does not include any logic changes only renaming of the modules and some
      moving around.
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
      d6f68bb9
  10. Mar 29, 2024
  11. Mar 27, 2024
  12. Mar 26, 2024
    • Pavel Orlov's avatar
      XCM Fee Payment Runtime API (#3607) · 3c972fc1
      Pavel Orlov authored
      
      
      The PR provides API for obtaining:
      - the weight required to execute an XCM message,
      - a list of acceptable `AssetId`s for message execution payment,
      - the cost of the weight in the specified acceptable `AssetId`.
      
      It is meant to address an issue where one has to guess how much fee to
      pay for execution. Also, at the moment, a client has to guess which
      assets are acceptable for fee execution payment.
      See the related issue
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/690.
      With this API, a client is supposed to query the list of the supported
      asset IDs (in the XCM version format the client understands), weigh the
      XCM program the client wants to execute and convert the weight into one
      of the acceptable assets. Note that the client is supposed to know what
      program will be executed on what chains. However, having a small
      companion JS library for the pallet-xcm and xtokens should be enough to
      determine what XCM programs will be executed and where (since these
      pallets compose a known small set of programs).
      ```Rust
      pub trait XcmPaymentApi<Call>
      	where
      		Call: Codec,
      	{
      		/// Returns a list of acceptable payment assets.
      		///
      		/// # Arguments
      		///
      		/// * `xcm_version`: Version.
      		fn query_acceptable_payment_assets(xcm_version: Version) -> Result<Vec<VersionedAssetId>, Error>;
      		/// Returns a weight needed to execute a XCM.
      		///
      		/// # Arguments
      		///
      		/// * `message`: `VersionedXcm`.
      		fn query_xcm_weight(message: VersionedXcm<Call>) -> Result<Weight, Error>;
      		/// Converts a weight into a fee for the specified `AssetId`.
      		///
      		/// # Arguments
      		///
      		/// * `weight`: convertible `Weight`.
      		/// * `asset`: `VersionedAssetId`.
      		fn query_weight_to_asset_fee(weight: Weight, asset: VersionedAssetId) -> Result<u128, Error>;
      		/// Get delivery fees for sending a specific `message` to a `destination`.
      		/// These always come in a specific asset, defined by the chain.
      		///
      		/// # Arguments
      		/// * `message`: The message that'll be sent, necessary because most delivery fees are based on the
      		///   size of the message.
      		/// * `destination`: The destination to send the message to. Different destinations may use
      		///   different senders that charge different fees.
      		fn query_delivery_fees(destination: VersionedLocation, message: VersionedXcm<()>) -> Result<VersionedAssets, Error>;
      	}
      ```
      An
      [example](https://gist.github.com/PraetorP/4bc323ff85401abe253897ba990ec29d)
      of a client side code.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAdrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDaniel Shiposha <[email protected]>
      3c972fc1
    • Tsvetomir Dimitrov's avatar
      Migrate parachain swaps to Coretime (#3714) · 90234543
      Tsvetomir Dimitrov authored
      This PR notifies broker pallet for any parachain slot swaps performed on
      the relay chain. This is achieved by registering an `OnSwap` for the the
      `coretime` pallet. The hook sends XCM message to the broker chain and
      invokes a new extrinsic `swap_leases` which updates `Leases` storage
      item (which keeps the legacy parachain leases).
      
      I made two assumptions in this PR:
      1.
      [`Leases`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/4987d798/substrate/frame/broker/src/lib.rs#L120)
      in `broker` pallet and
      [`Leases`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/4987d798
      
      /polkadot/runtime/common/src/slots/mod.rs#L118)
      in `slots` pallet are in sync.
      2. `swap_leases` extrinsic from `broker` pallet can be triggered only by
      root or by the XCM message from the relay chain. If not - the extrinsic
      will generate an error and do nothing.
      
      As a side effect from the changes `OnSwap` trait is moved from
      runtime/common/traits.rs to runtime/parachains. Otherwise it is not
      accessible from `broker` pallet.
      
      Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3552
      
      TODOs:
      
      - [x] Weights
      - [x] Tests
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatareskimor <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      90234543
  13. Mar 21, 2024
    • Alin Dima's avatar
      Elastic scaling: runtime dependency tracking and enactment (#3479) · 4842faf6
      Alin Dima authored
      
      
      Changes needed to implement the runtime part of elastic scaling:
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3131,
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3132,
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3202
      
      Also fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3675
      
      TODOs:
      
      - [x] storage migration
      - [x] optimise process_candidates from O(N^2)
      - [x] drop backable candidates which form cycles
      - [x] fix unit tests
      - [x] add more unit tests
      - [x] check the runtime APIs which use the pending availability storage.
      We need to expose all of them, see
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3576
      - [x] optimise the candidate selection. we're currently picking randomly
      until we satisfy the weight limit. we need to be smart about not
      breaking candidate chains while being fair to all paras -
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3573
      
      Relies on the changes made in
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3233 in terms of the
      inclusion policy and the candidate ordering
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avataralindima <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatareskimor <[email protected]>
      4842faf6
    • Egor_P's avatar
      [Backport] version bumps and prdocs reordering 1.9.0 (#3758) · 7b6b061e
      Egor_P authored
      This PR backports:
      - node version bump
      - `spec_vesion` bump
      - reordering of the `prdocs` to the appropriate folder
      from the `1.9.0` release branch
      7b6b061e
    • gupnik's avatar
      Migrates Westend to Runtime V2 (#3754) · 93b1abb2
      gupnik authored
      Step in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3688
      93b1abb2
  14. Mar 19, 2024
  15. Mar 15, 2024
  16. Mar 13, 2024
    • georgepisaltu's avatar
      Revert "FRAME: Create `TransactionExtension` as a replacement for... · bbd51ce8
      georgepisaltu authored
      
      Revert "FRAME: Create `TransactionExtension` as a replacement for `SignedExtension` (#2280)" (#3665)
      
      This PR reverts #2280 which introduced `TransactionExtension` to replace
      `SignedExtension`.
      
      As a result of the discussion
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3623#issuecomment-1986789700),
      the changes will be reverted for now with plans to reintroduce the
      concept in the future.
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
      bbd51ce8
  17. Mar 04, 2024
    • Gavin Wood's avatar
      FRAME: Create `TransactionExtension` as a replacement for `SignedExtension` (#2280) · fd5f9292
      Gavin Wood authored
      
      
      Closes #2160
      
      First part of [Extrinsic
      Horizon](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2415)
      
      Introduces a new trait `TransactionExtension` to replace
      `SignedExtension`. Introduce the idea of transactions which obey the
      runtime's extensions and have according Extension data (né Extra data)
      yet do not have hard-coded signatures.
      
      Deprecate the terminology of "Unsigned" when used for
      transactions/extrinsics owing to there now being "proper" unsigned
      transactions which obey the extension framework and "old-style" unsigned
      which do not. Instead we have __*General*__ for the former and
      __*Bare*__ for the latter. (Ultimately, the latter will be phased out as
      a type of transaction, and Bare will only be used for Inherents.)
      
      Types of extrinsic are now therefore:
      - Bare (no hardcoded signature, no Extra data; used to be known as
      "Unsigned")
      - Bare transactions (deprecated): Gossiped, validated with
      `ValidateUnsigned` (deprecated) and the `_bare_compat` bits of
      `TransactionExtension` (deprecated).
        - Inherents: Not gossiped, validated with `ProvideInherent`.
      - Extended (Extra data): Gossiped, validated via `TransactionExtension`.
        - Signed transactions (with a hardcoded signature).
        - General transactions (without a hardcoded signature).
      
      `TransactionExtension` differs from `SignedExtension` because:
      - A signature on the underlying transaction may validly not be present.
      - It may alter the origin during validation.
      - `pre_dispatch` is renamed to `prepare` and need not contain the checks
      present in `validate`.
      - `validate` and `prepare` is passed an `Origin` rather than a
      `AccountId`.
      - `validate` may pass arbitrary information into `prepare` via a new
      user-specifiable type `Val`.
      - `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to
      `Implicit`/`implicit`. It is encoded *for the entire transaction* and
      passed in to each extension as a new argument to `validate`. This
      facilitates the ability of extensions to acts as underlying crypto.
      
      There is a new `DispatchTransaction` trait which contains only default
      function impls and is impl'ed for any `TransactionExtension` impler. It
      provides several utility functions which reduce some of the tedium from
      using `TransactionExtension` (indeed, none of its regular functions
      should now need to be called directly).
      
      Three transaction version discriminator ("versions") are now
      permissible:
      - 0b000000100: Bare (used to be called "Unsigned"): contains Signature
      or Extra (extension data). After bare transactions are no longer
      supported, this will strictly identify an Inherents only.
      - 0b100000100: Old-school "Signed" Transaction: contains Signature and
      Extra (extension data).
      - 0b010000100: New-school "General" Transaction: contains Extra
      (extension data), but no Signature.
      
      For the New-school General Transaction, it becomes trivial for authors
      to publish extensions to the mechanism for authorizing an Origin, e.g.
      through new kinds of key-signing schemes, ZK proofs, pallet state,
      mutations over pre-authenticated origins or any combination of the
      above.
      
      ## Code Migration
      
      ### NOW: Getting it to build
      
      Wrap your `SignedExtension`s in `AsTransactionExtension`. This should be
      accompanied by renaming your aggregate type in line with the new
      terminology. E.g. Before:
      
      ```rust
      /// The SignedExtension to the basic transaction logic.
      pub type SignedExtra = (
      	/* snip */
      	MySpecialSignedExtension,
      );
      /// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime.
      pub type UncheckedExtrinsic =
      	generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, SignedExtra>;
      ```
      
      After:
      
      ```rust
      /// The extension to the basic transaction logic.
      pub type TxExtension = (
      	/* snip */
      	AsTransactionExtension<MySpecialSignedExtension>,
      );
      /// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime.
      pub type UncheckedExtrinsic =
      	generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, TxExtension>;
      ```
      
      You'll also need to alter any transaction building logic to add a
      `.into()` to make the conversion happen. E.g. Before:
      
      ```rust
      fn construct_extrinsic(
      		/* snip */
      ) -> UncheckedExtrinsic {
      	let extra: SignedExtra = (
      		/* snip */
      		MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */),
      	);
      	let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), extra.clone()).unwrap();
      	let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e));
      	UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed(
      		/* snip */
      		Signature::Sr25519(signature),
      		extra,
      	)
      }
      ```
      
      After:
      
      ```rust
      fn construct_extrinsic(
      		/* snip */
      ) -> UncheckedExtrinsic {
      	let tx_ext: TxExtension = (
      		/* snip */
      		MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */).into(),
      	);
      	let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), tx_ext.clone()).unwrap();
      	let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e));
      	UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed(
      		/* snip */
      		Signature::Sr25519(signature),
      		tx_ext,
      	)
      }
      ```
      
      ### SOON: Migrating to `TransactionExtension`
      
      Most `SignedExtension`s can be trivially converted to become a
      `TransactionExtension`. There are a few things to know.
      
      - Instead of a single trait like `SignedExtension`, you should now
      implement two traits individually: `TransactionExtensionBase` and
      `TransactionExtension`.
      - Weights are now a thing and must be provided via the new function `fn
      weight`.
      
      #### `TransactionExtensionBase`
      
      This trait takes care of anything which is not dependent on types
      specific to your runtime, most notably `Call`.
      
      - `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to
      `Implicit`/`implicit`.
      - Weight must be returned by implementing the `weight` function. If your
      extension is associated with a pallet, you'll probably want to do this
      via the pallet's existing benchmarking infrastructure.
      
      #### `TransactionExtension`
      
      Generally:
      - `pre_dispatch` is now `prepare` and you *should not reexecute the
      `validate` functionality in there*!
      - You don't get an account ID any more; you get an origin instead. If
      you need to presume an account ID, then you can use the trait function
      `AsSystemOriginSigner::as_system_origin_signer`.
      - You get an additional ticket, similar to `Pre`, called `Val`. This
      defines data which is passed from `validate` into `prepare`. This is
      important since you should not be duplicating logic from `validate` to
      `prepare`, you need a way of passing your working from the former into
      the latter. This is it.
      - This trait takes two type parameters: `Call` and `Context`. `Call` is
      the runtime call type which used to be an associated type; you can just
      move it to become a type parameter for your trait impl. `Context` is not
      currently used and you can safely implement over it as an unbounded
      type.
      - There's no `AccountId` associated type any more. Just remove it.
      
      Regarding `validate`:
      - You get three new parameters in `validate`; all can be ignored when
      migrating from `SignedExtension`.
      - `validate` returns a tuple on success; the second item in the tuple is
      the new ticket type `Self::Val` which gets passed in to `prepare`. If
      you use any information extracted during `validate` (off-chain and
      on-chain, non-mutating) in `prepare` (on-chain, mutating) then you can
      pass it through with this. For the tuple's last item, just return the
      `origin` argument.
      
      Regarding `prepare`:
      - This is renamed from `pre_dispatch`, but there is one change:
      - FUNCTIONALITY TO VALIDATE THE TRANSACTION NEED NOT BE DUPLICATED FROM
      `validate`!!
      - (This is different to `SignedExtension` which was required to run the
      same checks in `pre_dispatch` as in `validate`.)
      
      Regarding `post_dispatch`:
      - Since there are no unsigned transactions handled by
      `TransactionExtension`, `Pre` is always defined, so the first parameter
      is `Self::Pre` rather than `Option<Self::Pre>`.
      
      If you make use of `SignedExtension::validate_unsigned` or
      `SignedExtension::pre_dispatch_unsigned`, then:
      - Just use the regular versions of these functions instead.
      - Have your logic execute in the case that the `origin` is `None`.
      - Ensure your transaction creation logic creates a General Transaction
      rather than a Bare Transaction; this means having to include all
      `TransactionExtension`s' data.
      - `ValidateUnsigned` can still be used (for now) if you need to be able
      to construct transactions which contain none of the extension data,
      however these will be phased out in stage 2 of the Transactions Horizon,
      so you should consider moving to an extension-centric design.
      
      ## TODO
      
      - [x] Introduce `CheckSignature` impl of `TransactionExtension` to
      ensure it's possible to have crypto be done wholly in a
      `TransactionExtension`.
      - [x] Deprecate `SignedExtension` and move all uses in codebase to
      `TransactionExtension`.
        - [x] `ChargeTransactionPayment`
        - [x] `DummyExtension`
        - [x] `ChargeAssetTxPayment` (asset-tx-payment)
        - [x] `ChargeAssetTxPayment` (asset-conversion-tx-payment)
        - [x] `CheckWeight`
        - [x] `CheckTxVersion`
        - [x] `CheckSpecVersion`
        - [x] `CheckNonce`
        - [x] `CheckNonZeroSender`
        - [x] `CheckMortality`
        - [x] `CheckGenesis`
        - [x] `CheckOnlySudoAccount`
        - [x] `WatchDummy`
        - [x] `PrevalidateAttests`
        - [x] `GenericSignedExtension`
        - [x] `SignedExtension` (chain-polkadot-bulletin)
        - [x] `RefundSignedExtensionAdapter`
      - [x] Implement `fn weight` across the board.
      - [ ] Go through all pre-existing extensions which assume an account
      signer and explicitly handle the possibility of another kind of origin.
      - [x] `CheckNonce` should probably succeed in the case of a non-account
      origin.
      - [x] `CheckNonZeroSender` should succeed in the case of a non-account
      origin.
      - [x] `ChargeTransactionPayment` and family should fail in the case of a
      non-account origin.
        - [ ] 
      - [x] Fix any broken tests.
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandru Vasile <[email protected]>
      Signed-off-by: default avatardependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarNikhil Gupta <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarChevdor <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarMaciej <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJavier Viola <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarMarcin S. <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarTsvetomir Dimitrov <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJavier Bullrich <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarKoute <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAdrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: Vladimir Istyufeev's avatarVladimir Istyufeev <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarRoss Bulat <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarGonçalo Pestana <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarLiam Aharon <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarSvyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAndré Silva <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatars0me0ne-unkn0wn <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarordian <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarSebastian Kunert <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAaro Altonen <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDmitry Markin <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexandru Vasile <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexander Samusev <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJulian Eager <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarMichal Kucharczyk <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDavide Galassi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDónal Murray <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avataryjh <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarTom Mi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatardependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarWill | Paradox | ParaNodes.io <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJoshy Orndorff <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJoshy Orndorff <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarPG Herveou <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexander Theißen <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarKian Paimani <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJuan Girini <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarbader y <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJames Wilson <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarjoe petrowski <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarasynchronous rob <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarParth <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAndrew Jones <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJonathan Udd <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarSerban Iorga <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarEgor_P <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarEvgeny Snitko <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJust van Stam <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatargupnik <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatardzmitry-lahoda <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarzhiqiangxu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarNazar Mokrynskyi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAnwesh <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarcheme <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarSam Johnson <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarkianenigma <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJegor Sidorenko <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarMuharem <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarjoepetrowski <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarGabriel Facco de Arruda <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarSquirrel <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      fd5f9292
  18. Mar 01, 2024
  19. Feb 29, 2024
    • Tsvetomir Dimitrov's avatar
      Remove `AssignmentProviderConfig` and use parameters from `HostConfiguration` instead (#3181) · a035dc9b
      Tsvetomir Dimitrov authored
      This PR removes `AssignmentProviderConfig` and uses the corresponding
      ondemand parameters from `HostConfiguration` instead. Additionally
      `scheduling_lookahead` and all coretime/ondemand related parameters are
      extracted in a separate struct - `SchedulerParams`.
      
      The most relevant commit from the PR is [this
      one](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3181/commits/830bc0f5).
      
      Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2268
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      a035dc9b
  20. Feb 28, 2024
    • Oliver Tale-Yazdi's avatar
      Multi-Block-Migrations, `poll` hook and new System callbacks (#1781) · eefd5fe4
      Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
      
      
      This MR is the merge of
      https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/14414 and
      https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/14275. It implements
      [RFC#13](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/RFCs/pull/13), closes
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/198.
      
      ----- 
      
      This Merge request introduces three major topicals:
      
      1. Multi-Block-Migrations
      1. New pallet `poll` hook for periodic service work
      1. Replacement hooks for `on_initialize` and `on_finalize` in cases
      where `poll` cannot be used
      
      and some more general changes to FRAME.  
      The changes for each topical span over multiple crates. They are listed
      in topical order below.
      
      # 1.) Multi-Block-Migrations
      
      Multi-Block-Migrations are facilitated by creating `pallet_migrations`
      and configuring `System::Config::MultiBlockMigrator` to point to it.
      Executive picks this up and triggers one step of the migrations pallet
      per block.
      The chain is in lockdown mode for as long as an MBM is ongoing.
      Executive does this by polling `MultiBlockMigrator::ongoing` and not
      allowing any transaction in a block, if true.
      
      A MBM is defined through trait `SteppedMigration`. A condensed version
      looks like this:
      ```rust
      /// A migration that can proceed in multiple steps.
      pub trait SteppedMigration {
      	type Cursor: FullCodec + MaxEncodedLen;
      	type Identifier: FullCodec + MaxEncodedLen;
      
      	fn id() -> Self::Identifier;
      
      	fn max_steps() -> Option<u32>;
      
      	fn step(
      		cursor: Option<Self::Cursor>,
      		meter: &mut WeightMeter,
      	) -> Result<Option<Self::Cursor>, SteppedMigrationError>;
      }
      ```
      
      `pallet_migrations` can be configured with an aggregated tuple of these
      migrations. It then starts to migrate them one-by-one on the next
      runtime upgrade.
      Two things are important here:
      - 1. Doing another runtime upgrade while MBMs are ongoing is not a good
      idea and can lead to messed up state.
      - 2. **Pallet Migrations MUST BE CONFIGURED IN `System::Config`,
      otherwise it is not used.**
      
      The pallet supports an `UpgradeStatusHandler` that can be used to notify
      external logic of upgrade start/finish (for example to pause XCM
      dispatch).
      
      Error recovery is very limited in the case that a migration errors or
      times out (exceeds its `max_steps`). Currently the runtime dev can
      decide in `FailedMigrationHandler::failed` how to handle this. One
      follow-up would be to pair this with the `SafeMode` pallet and enact
      safe mode when an upgrade fails, to allow governance to rescue the
      chain. This is currently not possible, since governance is not
      `Mandatory`.
      
      ## Runtime API
      
      - `Core`: `initialize_block` now returns `ExtrinsicInclusionMode` to
      inform the Block Author whether they can push transactions.
      
      ### Integration
      
      Add it to your runtime implementation of `Core` and `BlockBuilder`:
      ```patch
      diff --git a/runtime/src/lib.rs b/runtime/src/lib.rs
      @@ impl_runtime_apis! {
      	impl sp_block_builder::Core<Block> for Runtime {
      -		fn initialize_block(header: &<Block as BlockT>::Header) {
      +		fn initialize_block(header: &<Block as BlockT>::Header) -> RuntimeExecutiveMode {
      			Executive::initialize_block(header)
      		}
      
      		...
      	}
      ```
      
      # 2.) `poll` hook
      
      A new pallet hook is introduced: `poll`. `Poll` is intended to replace
      mostly all usage of `on_initialize`.
      The reason for this is that any code that can be called from
      `on_initialize` cannot be migrated through an MBM. Currently there is no
      way to statically check this; the implication is to use `on_initialize`
      as rarely as possible.
      Failing to do so can result in broken storage invariants.
      
      The implementation of the poll hook depends on the `Runtime API` changes
      that are explained above.
      
      # 3.) Hard-Deadline callbacks
      
      Three new callbacks are introduced and configured on `System::Config`:
      `PreInherents`, `PostInherents` and `PostTransactions`.
      These hooks are meant as replacement for `on_initialize` and
      `on_finalize` in cases where the code that runs cannot be moved to
      `poll`.
      The reason for this is to make the usage of HD-code (hard deadline) more
      explicit - again to prevent broken invariants by MBMs.
      
      # 4.) FRAME (general changes)
      
      ## `frame_system` pallet
      
      A new memorize storage item `InherentsApplied` is added. It is used by
      executive to track whether inherents have already been applied.
      Executive and can then execute the MBMs directly between inherents and
      transactions.
      
      The `Config` gets five new items:
      - `SingleBlockMigrations` this is the new way of configuring migrations
      that run in a single block. Previously they were defined as last generic
      argument of `Executive`. This shift is brings all central configuration
      about migrations closer into view of the developer (migrations that are
      configured in `Executive` will still work for now but is deprecated).
      - `MultiBlockMigrator` this can be configured to an engine that drives
      MBMs. One example would be the `pallet_migrations`. Note that this is
      only the engine; the exact MBMs are injected into the engine.
      - `PreInherents` a callback that executes after `on_initialize` but
      before inherents.
      - `PostInherents` a callback that executes after all inherents ran
      (including MBMs and `poll`).
      - `PostTransactions` in symmetry to `PreInherents`, this one is called
      before `on_finalize` but after all transactions.
      
      A sane default is to set all of these to `()`. Example diff suitable for
      any chain:
      ```patch
      @@ impl frame_system::Config for Test {
       	type MaxConsumers = ConstU32<16>;
      +	type SingleBlockMigrations = ();
      +	type MultiBlockMigrator = ();
      +	type PreInherents = ();
      +	type PostInherents = ();
      +	type PostTransactions = ();
       }
      ```
      
      An overview of how the block execution now looks like is here. The same
      graph is also in the rust doc.
      
      <details><summary>Block Execution Flow</summary>
      <p>
      
      ![Screenshot 2023-12-04 at 19 11
      29](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/10380170/e88a80c4-ef11-4faa-8df5-8b33a724c054)
      
      </p>
      </details> 
      
      ## Inherent Order
      
      Moved to https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2154
      
      ---------------
      
      
      ## TODO
      
      - [ ] Check that `try-runtime` still works
      - [ ] Ensure backwards compatibility with old Runtime APIs
      - [x] Consume weight correctly
      - [x] Cleanup
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarLiam Aharon <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJuan Girini <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarGavin Wood <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      eefd5fe4
  21. Feb 26, 2024
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      [pallet-xcm] Adjust benchmarks (teleport_assets/reserve_transfer_assets) not relying on ED (#3464) · 3d9439f6
      Branislav Kontur authored
      
      
      ## Problem
      During the bumping of the `polkadot-fellows` repository to
      `[email protected]`, I encountered a situation where the benchmarks
      `teleport_assets` and `reserve_transfer_assets` in AssetHubKusama
      started to fail. This issue arose due to a decreased ED balance for
      AssetHubs introduced
      [here](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/158/files#diff-80668ff8e793b64f36a9a3ec512df5cbca4ad448c157a5d81abda1b15f35f1daR213),
      and also because of a [missing CI
      pipeline](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/issues/197) to
      check the benchmarks, which went unnoticed.
      
      These benchmarks expect the `caller` to have enough:
      1. balance to transfer (BTT)
      2. balance for paying delivery (BFPD).
       
      So the initial balance was calculated as `ED * 100`, which seems
      reasonable:
      ```
      const ED_MULTIPLIER: u32 = 100;
      let balance = existential_deposit.saturating_mul(ED_MULTIPLIER.into());`
      ```
      The problem arises when the price for delivery is 100 times higher than
      the existential deposit. In other words, when `ED * 100` does not cover
      `BTT` + `BFPD`.
      
      I check AHR/AHW/AHK/AHP and this problem has only AssetHubKusama
      ```
      ED: 3333333
      calculated price to parent delivery:  1031666634  (from xcm logs from the benchmark)
      ---
      
      3333333 * 100 - BTT(3333333) - BFPD(1031666634) = −701666667
      ```
      which results in the error;
      ```
      2024-02-23 09:19:42 Unable to charge fee with error Module(ModuleError { index: 31, error: [17, 0, 0, 0], message: Some("FeesNotMet") })
      Error: Input("Benchmark pallet_xcm::reserve_transfer_assets failed: FeesNotMet")
           
      ```
      
      ## Solution
      
      The benchmarks `teleport_assets` and `reserve_transfer_assets` were
      fixed by removing `ED * 100` and replacing it with `DeliveryHelper`
      logic, which calculates the (almost real) price for delivery and sets it
      along with the existential deposit as the initial balance for the
      account used in the benchmark.
      
      
      ## TODO
      
      - [ ] patch for 1.6 -
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3466
      - [ ] patch for 1.7 -
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3465
      - [ ] patch for 1.8 - TODO: PR
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
      3d9439f6
    • eskimor's avatar
      Remove redundant parachains assigner pallet. (#3457) · ce5de995
      eskimor authored
      
      
      from Westend and Rococo.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatareskimor <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      ce5de995
  22. Feb 19, 2024
  23. Feb 09, 2024
  24. Feb 08, 2024
    • Gonçalo Pestana's avatar
      Fixes `TotalValueLocked` out of sync in nomination pools (#3052) · aac07af0
      Gonçalo Pestana authored
      The `TotalLockedValue` storage value in nomination pools pallet may get
      out of sync if the staking pallet does implicit withdrawal of unlocking
      chunks belonging to a bonded pool stash. This fix is based on a new
      method in the `OnStakingUpdate` traits, `on_withdraw`, which allows the
      nomination pools pallet to adjust the `TotalLockedValue` every time
      there is an implicit or explicit withdrawal from a bonded pool's stash.
      
      This PR also adds a migration that checks and updates the on-chain TVL
      if it got out of sync due to the bug this PR fixes.
      
      **Changes to `trait OnStakingUpdate`**
      
      In order for staking to notify the nomination pools pallet that chunks
      where withdrew, we add a new method, `on_withdraw` to the
      `OnStakingUpdate` trait. The nomination pools pallet filters the
      withdraws that are related to bonded pool accounts and updates the
      `TotalValueLocked` accordingly.
      
      **Others**
      - Adds try-state checks to the EPM/staking e2e tests
      - Adds tests for auto withdrawing in the context of nomination pools
      
      **To-do**
      - [x] check if we need a migration to fix the current `TotalValueLocked`
      (run try-runtime)
      - [x] migrations to fix the current on-chain TVL value 
      
        **Kusama**:
      ```
      TotalValueLocked: 99.4559 kKSM
      TotalValueLocked (calculated) 99.4559 kKSM
      ```
      
      
      ️ **Westend**:
      ```
      TotalValueLocked: 18.4060 kWND
      TotalValueLocked (calculated) 18.4050 kWND
      ```
      **Polkadot**: TVL not released yet.
      
      Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3055
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarRoss Bulat <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDónal Murray <[email protected]>
      aac07af0
  25. Feb 06, 2024
  26. Jan 31, 2024
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      [frame] `#[pallet::composite_enum]` improved variant count handling + removed... · bb8ddc46
      Branislav Kontur authored
      [frame] `#[pallet::composite_enum]` improved variant count handling + removed `pallet_balances`'s `MaxHolds` config (#2657)
      
      I started this investigation/issue based on @liamaharon
      
       question
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1801#discussion_r1410452499).
      
      ## Problem
      
      The `pallet_balances` integrity test should correctly detect that the
      runtime has correct distinct `HoldReasons` variant count. I assume the
      same situation exists for RuntimeFreezeReason.
      
      It is not a critical problem, if we set `MaxHolds` with a sufficiently
      large value, everything should be ok. However, in this case, the
      integrity_test check becomes less useful.
      
      **Situation for "any" runtime:**
      - `HoldReason` enums from different pallets:
      ```rust
              /// from pallet_nis
              #[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason {
      		NftReceipt,
      	}
      
              /// from pallet_preimage
              #[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason {
      		Preimage,
      	}
      
              // from pallet_state-trie-migration
              #[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason {
      		SlashForContinueMigrate,
      		SlashForMigrateCustomTop,
      		SlashForMigrateCustomChild,
      	}
      ```
      
      - generated `RuntimeHoldReason` enum looks like:
      ```rust
      pub enum RuntimeHoldReason {
      
          #[codec(index = 32u8)]
          Preimage(pallet_preimage::HoldReason),
      
          #[codec(index = 38u8)]
          Nis(pallet_nis::HoldReason),
      
          #[codec(index = 42u8)]
          StateTrieMigration(pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason),
      }
      ```
      
      - composite enum `RuntimeHoldReason` variant count is detected as `3`
      - we set `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>`
      - `pallet_balances::integrity_test` is ok with `3`(at least 3)
      
      However, the real problem can occur in a live runtime where some
      functionality might stop working. This is due to a total of 5 distinct
      hold reasons (for pallets with multi-instance support, it is even more),
      and not all of them can be used because of an incorrect `MaxHolds`,
      which is deemed acceptable according to the `integrity_test`:
        ```
        // pseudo-code - if we try to call all of these:
      
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_nis::HoldReason::NftReceipt.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_preimage::HoldReason::Preimage.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
      
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForContinueMigrate.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
      
        // With `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>` these two will fail
      
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomTop.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
      
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomChild.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
        ```  
      
      
      ## Solutions
      
      A macro `#[pallet::*]` expansion is extended of `VariantCount`
      implementation for the `#[pallet::composite_enum]` enum type. This
      expansion generates the `VariantCount` implementation for pallets'
      `HoldReason`, `FreezeReason`, `LockId`, and `SlashReason`. Enum variants
      must be plain enum values without fields to ensure a deterministic
      count.
      
      The composite runtime enum, `RuntimeHoldReason` and
      `RuntimeFreezeReason`, now sets `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT` as the sum
      of pallets' enum `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT`:
      ```rust
      #[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)]
      mod module_single_instance {
      
      	#[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason {
      		ModuleSingleInstanceReason1,
      		ModuleSingleInstanceReason2,
      	}
      ...
      }
      
      #[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)]
      mod module_multi_instance {
      
      	#[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason<I: 'static = ()> {
      		ModuleMultiInstanceReason1,
      		ModuleMultiInstanceReason2,
      		ModuleMultiInstanceReason3,
      	}
      ...
      }
      
      
      impl self::sp_api_hidden_includes_construct_runtime::hidden_include::traits::VariantCount
          for RuntimeHoldReason
      {
          const VARIANT_COUNT: u32 = 0
              + module_single_instance::HoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT
              + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance1>::VARIANT_COUNT
              + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance2>::VARIANT_COUNT
              + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance3>::VARIANT_COUNT;
      }
      ```
      
      In addition, `MaxHolds` is removed (as suggested
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2657#discussion_r1443324573))
      from `pallet_balances`, and its `Holds` are now bounded to
      `RuntimeHoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT`. Therefore, there is no need to let
      the runtime specify `MaxHolds`.
      
      
      ## For reviewers
      
      Relevant changes can be found here:
      - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/lib.rs` 
      -  `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/parse/composite.rs`
      -  `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/expand/composite.rs`
      -
      `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/composite_helper.rs`
      -
      `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/hold_reason.rs`
      -
      `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/freeze_reason.rs`
      - `substrate/frame/support/src/traits/misc.rs`
      
      And the rest of the files is just about removed `MaxHolds` from
      `pallet_balances`
      
      ## Next steps
      
      Do the same for `MaxFreezes`
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2997.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDónal Murray <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatargupnik <[email protected]>
      bb8ddc46
  27. Jan 30, 2024
  28. Jan 24, 2024
    • Just van Stam's avatar
      Transactional processing for XCM (#1222) · 50eb12cf
      Just van Stam authored
      
      
      Moved from: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6951
      
      closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/490
      
      - [x] update cumulus
      
      --- 
      This PR introduces transactional processing of certain xcm instructions.
      For the list of instructions checkout
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/490. The transactional
      processing is implemented as an xcm-executor config item. The two
      implementations in this PR are `FrameTransactionalProcessor` and `()`.
      The `()` implementation does no transactional processing. Each
      implementation of the `ProcessTransaction` trait has an
      `IS_TRANSACTIONAL` const that tells the XCVM if transactional processing
      is actually implemented. If Transactional processing is implemented,
      changes to touched registers should also be rolled back to prevent
      inconsistencies.
      
      
      Note for reviewers:
      Check out the following safety assumption:
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1222/files#diff-4effad7d8c1c9de19fd27e18661cbf2128c8718f3b2420a27d2f816e0749ea53R30
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarKeith Yeung <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      50eb12cf
  29. Jan 23, 2024