- Nov 24, 2023
-
-
Liam Aharon authored
DMP queue migration is complete and the pallet should be removed to fix the check runtime upgrade CI. <img width="1501" alt="Screenshot 2023-11-24 at 16 05 37" src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/16665596/ee1da6bb-2756-4423-8085-1e4c73553ad5"> <img width="1501" alt="Screenshot 2023-11-24 at 16 06 44" src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/16665596/03f3e88f-aed8-4eaa-aab6-7998f72258be">
-
Xiliang Chen authored
On extrinsics/call, ensure local XCM execution is complete/successful. Otherwise, fail the extrinsic so that state changes don't get committed to the db. Added regression tests that fail without the fix. fixes #2237 --------- Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 23, 2023
-
-
André Silva authored
Broken after #2446.
-
Bastian Köcher authored
This moves the macro related re-exports to `__private` to make it more obvious for downstream users that they are using an internal api. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Nov 22, 2023
-
-
Michal Kucharczyk authored
The out-dated version (bad tag) of [polkadot image](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/ede4a362622dfa69eb167eaa876246b1289f4b41/.gitlab/pipeline/zombienet/cumulus.yml#L31) ([docker info](https://hub.docker.com/layers/paritypr/polkadot-debug/master/images/sha256:adb1658052cf671b50c90d5cece5c7a131efa1a95978249bd5cb85a5ad654f7a?context=explore)) was used. This PR fixes this. See also: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2411#issuecomment-1822632724 Also adds an abstraction that allows asynchronous backends to be passed to `ChainApiSubsystem` --------- Co-authored-by:
Sebastian Kunert <[email protected]>
-
Marcin S. authored
-
- Nov 21, 2023
-
-
Sophia Gold authored
This updates the tick runtime and polkadot-parachain collator to use async backing.
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
Adding on top of the new builder pattern for creating XCM programs, I'm adding some more APIs: ```rust let paying_fees: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder() // Only allow paying for fees .withdraw_asset() // First instruction has to load the holding register .buy_execution() // Second instruction has to be `buy_execution` .build(); let paying_fees_invalid: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder() .withdraw_asset() .build(); // Invalid, need to pay for fees let not_paying_fees: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder_unpaid() .unpaid_execution() // Needed .withdraw_asset() .deposit_asset() .build(); let all_goes: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder_unsafe() // You can do anything .withdraw_asset() .deposit_asset() .build(); ``` The invalid bits are because the methods don't even exist on the types that you'd want to call them on. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
Michal Kucharczyk authored
This PR removes: - `New`, `Generate`, `Edit` commands, - `kitchensink` dependency from the `chain-spec-builder` util. New `convert-to-raw`, `update-code` commands were added. Additionally renames the `runtime` command (which was added in #1256) to `create`. --------- Co-authored-by:
Sebastian Kunert <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Nov 19, 2023
-
-
Julian Eager authored
Co-authored-by:
Marcin S <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 18, 2023
-
-
dependabot[bot] authored
Bumps [secp256k1](https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1) from 0.24.3 to 0.28.0. <details> <summary>Changelog</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md">secp256k1's changelog</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h1>0.28.0 - 2023-10-23</h1> <ul> <li>Add bindings to the ElligatorSwift implementation <a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/627">#627</a></li> <li>Depend on recent release of <code>bitcoin_hashes</code> v0.13.0 <a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/621">#621</a></li> <li>Add a verify function to <code>PublicKey</code> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/618">#618</a></li> <li>Add serialize function for schnorr::Signature <a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/607">#607</a></li> <li>Bump MSRV to 1.48 <a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/595">#595</a></li> <li>Remove implementations of <code>PartialEq</code>, <code>Eq</code>, <code>PartialOrd</code>, <code>Ord</code>, and <code>Hash</code> from the <code>impl_array_newtype</code> macro. Users will now need to derive these traits if they are wanted.</li> </ul> <h1>0.27.0 - 2023-03-15</h1> <ul> <li><a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/588">Depend on newly release <code>bitcoin_hashes</code> v0.12</a>.</li> <li><a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/578">Implement <code>Debug</code> trait for <code>Scalar</code> type</a>.</li> <li><a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/582">Implement <code>insecure-erase</code></a>.</li> </ul> <h1>0.26.0 - 2202-12-19</h1> <ul> <li>Update libsecp25k1 to v0.2.0</li> </ul> <h1>0.25.0 - 2022-12-07</h1> <ul> <li><a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/548">Fix soundness issue with <code>preallocated_gen_new</code></a></li> <li>Update to <code>secp256k1-sys</code> <a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/549">v0.7.0</a></li> <li>Use type system to <a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/483">improve safety</a>.</li> <li><a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/490">Change secp256k1-sys symbol names to 0_6_1</a>.</li> <li><a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/499">Introduce <code>rustfmt</code></a> to the codebase.</li> <li><a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/507">Make all raw pointer methods go through the CPtr trait</a>.</li> <li><a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/518">Make comparison functions stable</a>.</li> <li><a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/512">Remove</a> public constant <code>ONE_KEY</code> (consider using <code>FromStr</code> as a replacement).</li> </ul> <h1>0.24.1 - 2022-10-25</h1> <ul> <li><a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/issues/491">Fix broken deserialization logic of <code>KeyPair</code></a> that previously always panicked. After the patch deserialization only panics if neither the <code>global-context</code> nor the <code>alloc</code> (default) feature is active.</li> </ul> <h1>0.24.0 - 2022-07-20</h1> <ul> <li>Upgrade to new release of <a href="https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/bitcoin_hashes/releases/tag/0.11.0">bitcoin_hashes</a>.</li> </ul> <h1>0.23.4 - 2022-07-14</h1> <ul> <li><a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/474">Disable automatic rerandomization of contexts under WASM</a></li> </ul> <h1>0.23.3 - 2022-06-29</h1> <ul> <li><a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/465">Add must_use for mut self key manipulation methods</a></li> <li><a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/466">Fix fuzzing feature guard</a></li> </ul> <h1>0.23.2 - 2022-06-27</h1> <!-- raw HTML omitted --> </blockquote> <p>... (truncated)</p> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/commit/7de09c8050da12a13ef9ee3850597f69c887952d"><code>7de09c8</code></a> Merge <a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/issues/256">rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1256</a>: Tracking PR for release: `secp256k1 v0...</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/commit/3dc5b165401f249c01a88cec54061301cffd97a0"><code>3dc5b16</code></a> Bump version to v0.28.0</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/commit/3aada83180beec2b9f5ab8e7b9280a5517d3bcde"><code>3aada83</code></a> Merge <a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/issues/256">rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1256</a>: Add bindings to the ElligatorSwift imp...</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/commit/39febcb866ce285d53052a3636602f04483aa710"><code>39febcb</code></a> Create rust-bidings</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/commit/da4f67b274c3061717723a568cfb182e4e2e7cce"><code>da4f67b</code></a> Merge <a href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/issues/256">rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1256</a>: Update vendored lib secp256k1 to v0.4.0</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/commit/80b2a8d4aa6ffa72041d569eab2278cd8c1ace2a"><code>80b2a8d</code></a> Update vendored libsecp to v0.4.0</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/commit/d2285c929a086276ce6d1670d795c49191e30c65"><code>d2285c9</code></a> ci: Remove MIPS* from CI</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/commit/0d58f50d523b40a78de0b87146208e3ad338c8ba"><code>0d58f50</code></a> ci: generalize grp in "illegal callback" test</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/commit/acf9ac13e9f8df84dd52d2f012cda7211a6af10c"><code>acf9ac1</code></a> delete <code>test_manual_create_destroy</code> test</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/commit/04ce50891bb0d49be5355f5c0d82db70d7dda65a"><code>04ce508</code></a> lib: fix bad unit test</li> <li>Additional commits viewable in <a href="https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/compare/secp256k1-0.24.3...secp256k1-0.28.0">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> [![Dependabot compatibility score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency-name=secp256k1&package-manager=cargo&previous-version=0.24.3&new-version=0.28.0)](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores ) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- <details> <summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary> <br /> You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore <dependency name> major version` will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency's major version (unless you unignore this specific dependency's major version or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore <dependency name> minor version` will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency's minor version (unless you unignore this specific dependency's minor version or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore <dependency name>` will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency (unless you unignore this specific dependency or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot unignore <dependency name>` will remove all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot unignore <dependency name> <ignore condition>` will remove the ignore condition of the specified dependency and ignore conditions </details> --------- Signed-off-by:
dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
Liam Aharon <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 17, 2023
-
-
Davide Galassi authored
Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2327 cc @burdges
-
Nazar Mokrynskyi authored
# Description Sometimes changing file descriptor limits is not allowed, but there is no need to crash the node if/when this happens. Since `fdlimit`'s author decided to use panics instead of returning `Result`, we need to catch it. # Checklist - [x] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the "Description" section above - [ ] My PR follows the [labeling requirements](CONTRIBUTING.md#Process) of this project (at minimum one label for `T` required) - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if applicable) - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if applicable) --------- Co-authored-by:
Koute <[email protected]>
-
Michal Kucharczyk authored
The `lazy_static` package does not work well in `no-std`: it requires `spin_no_std` feature, which also will propagate into `std` if enabled. This is not what we want. This PR provides simple address uri parser which allows to get rid of _regex_ which was used to parse the address uri, what in turns allows to remove lazy_static. Three regular expressions (`SS58_REGEX`,`SECRET_PHRASE_REGEX`,`JUNCTION_REGEX`) were replaced with the parser which unifies all of them. The new parser does not support Unicode, it is ASCII only. Related to: #2044 --------- Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Koute <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Nov 15, 2023
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
Adds a function for querying the last runtime upgrade spec version. This can be useful for when writing runtime level migrations to ensure that they are not executed multiple times. An example would be a session key migration. --------- Co-authored-by:
Liam Aharon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
-
Branislav Kontur authored
Rococo<>Wococo bridge is replaced by Rococo<Westend bridge, so this PR removes unneeded code. - [x] update bridges subtree after https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/pull/2692 --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
Svyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]>
-
Dónal Murray authored
Add collectives and glutton parachain westend runtimes to prepare for #1737. The removal of system parachain native runtimes #1737 is blocked until chainspecs and runtime APIs can be dealt with cleanly (merge of #1256 and follow up PRs). In the meantime, these additions are ready to be merged to `master`, so I have separated them out into this PR. Also marked `bridge-hub-westend` as unimplemented in line with [this issue](https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2602 ). TODO - [x] add to `command-bot` benchmarks - [x] add to `command-bot-scripts` benchmarks - [x] generate weights --------- Co-authored-by:
joe petrowski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Muharem <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>
-
joe petrowski authored
The goal of this PR is to migrate Identity deposits from the Relay Chain to a system parachain. The problem I want to solve is that `IdentityOf` and `SubsOf` both store an amount that's held in reserve as a storage deposit. When migrating to a parachain, we can take a snapshot of the actual `IdentityInfo` and sub-account mappings, but should migrate (off chain) the `deposit`s to zero, since the chain (and by extension, accounts) won't have any funds at genesis. The good news is that we expect parachain deposits to be significantly lower (possibly 100x) on the parachain. That is, a deposit of 21 DOT on the Relay Chain would need 0.21 DOT on a parachain. This PR proposes to migrate the deposits in the following way: 1. Introduces a new pallet with two extrinsics: - `reap_identity`: Has a configurable `ReapOrigin`, which would be set to `EnsureSigned` on the Relay Chain (i.e. callable by anyone) and `EnsureRoot` on the parachain (we don't want identities reaped from there). - `poke_deposit`: Checks what deposit the pallet holds (at genesis, zero) and attempts to update the amount based on the calculated deposit for storage data. 2. `reap_identity` clears all storage data for a `target` account and unreserves their deposit. 3. A `ReapIdentityHandler` teleports the necessary DOT to the parachain and calls `poke_deposit`. Since the parachain deposit is much lower, and was just unreserved, we know we have enough. One awkwardness I ran into was that the XCMv3 instruction set does not provide a way for the system to teleport assets without a fee being deducted on reception. Users shouldn't have to pay a fee for the system to migrate their info to a more efficient location. So I wrote my own program and did the `InitiateTeleport` accounting on my own to send a program with `UnpaidExecution`. Have discussed an `InitiateUnpaidTeleport` instruction with @franciscoaguirre . Obviously any chain executing this would have to pass a `Barrier` for free execution. TODO: - [x] Confirm People Chain ParaId - [x] Confirm People Chain deposit rates (determined in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2281 ) - [x] Add pallet to Westend --------- Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 14, 2023
-
-
PG Herveou authored
This PR introduces: - XCM host functions `xcm_send`, `xcm_execute` - An Xcm trait into the config. that proxy these functions to to `pallet_xcm`, or disable their usage by using `()`. - A mock_network and xcm_test files to test the newly added xcm-related functions. --------- Co-authored-by:
Keith Yeung <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Sasha Gryaznov <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Alexander Theißen <[email protected]>
-
Alin Dima authored
Adds a `NodeFeatures` bitfield value to the runtime `HostConfiguration`, with the purpose of coordinating the enabling of node-side features, such as: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/628 and https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/598. These are features that require all validators enable them at the same time, assuming all/most nodes have upgraded their node versions. This PR doesn't add any feature yet. These are coming in future PRs. Also adds a runtime API for querying the state of the client features and an extrinsic for setting/unsetting a feature by its index in the bitfield. Note: originally part of: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1644, but posted as standalone to be reused by other PRs until the initial PR is merged
-
jserrat authored
Co-authored-by:
Marcin S <[email protected]>
-
Alexandru Vasile authored
This PR adds support for multiple hashes being passed to the `chainHeda_unpin` parameters. The `hash` parameter is renamed to `hash_or_hashes` per https://github.com/paritytech/json-rpc-interface-spec/pull/111 . While at it, a new integration test is added to check the unpinning of multiple hashes. The API is checked against a hash or a vector of hashes. cc @paritytech/subxt-team --------- Signed-off-by:
Alexandru Vasile <[email protected]>
-
Marcin S. authored
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
- switch from Rococo<>Wococo to Rococo<>Westend bridge - add bidirectional simple tests - remove Wococo chains from xcm-emulator - added tests for assets transfers over Rococo<>Westend bridge fixes https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2405
-
- Nov 13, 2023
-
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
## Motivation `pallet-xcm` is the main user-facing interface for XCM functionality, including assets manipulation functions like `teleportAssets()` and `reserve_transfer_assets()` calls. While `teleportAsset()` works both ways, `reserve_transfer_assets()` works only for sending reserve-based assets to a remote destination and beneficiary when the reserve is the _local chain_. ## Solution This PR enhances `pallet_xcm::(limited_)reserve_withdraw_assets` to support transfers when reserves are other chains. This will allow complete, **bi-directional** reserve-based asset transfers user stories using `pallet-xcm`. Enables following scenarios: - transferring assets with local reserve (was previously supported iff asset used as fee also had local reserve - now it works in all cases), - transferring assets with reserve on destination, - transferring assets with reserve on remote/third-party chain (iff assets and fees have same remote reserve), - transferring assets with reserve different than the reserve of the asset to be used as fees - meaning can be used to transfer random asset with local/dest reserve while using DOT for fees on all involved chains, even if DOT local/dest reserve doesn't match asset reserve, - transferring assets with any type of local/dest reserve while using fees which can be teleported between involved chains. All of the above is done by pallet inner logic without the user having to specify which scenario/reserves/teleports/etc. The correct scenario and corresponding XCM programs are identified, and respectively, built automatically based on runtime configuration of trusted teleporters and trusted reserves. #### Current limitations: - while `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CAN have different reserves (or fees CAN be teleported), the remaining "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT, among themselves, have different reserve locations (this is also implicitly enforced by `MAX_ASSETS_FOR_TRANSFER=2`, but this can be safely increased in the future). - `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT have **different remote** reserves (this could also be supported in the future, but adds even more complexity while possibly not being worth it - we'll see what the future holds). Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1584 Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2055 --------- Co-authored-by:
Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>
-
gupnik authored
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1725 This PR adds the following changes: 1. An attribute `pallet::feeless_if` that can be optionally attached to a call like so: ```rust #[pallet::feeless_if(|_origin: &OriginFor<T>, something: &u32| -> bool { *something == 0 })] pub fn do_something(origin: OriginFor<T>, something: u32) -> DispatchResult { .... } ``` The closure passed accepts references to arguments as specified in the call fn. It returns a boolean that denotes the conditions required for this call to be "feeless". 2. A signed extension `SkipCheckIfFeeless<T: SignedExtension>` that wraps a transaction payment processor such as `pallet_transaction_payment::ChargeTransactionPayment`. It checks for all calls annotated with `pallet::feeless_if` to see if the conditions are met. If so, the wrapped signed extension is not called, essentially making the call feeless. In order to use this, you can simply replace your existing signed extension that manages transaction payment like so: ```diff - pallet_transaction_payment::ChargeTransactionPayment<Runtime>, + pallet_skip_feeless_payment::SkipCheckIfFeeless< + Runtime, + pallet_transaction_payment::ChargeTransactionPayment<Runtime>, + >, ``` ### Todo - [x] Tests - [x] Docs - [x] Prdoc --------- Co-authored-by: Nikhil Gupta <> Co-authored-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Liam Aharon <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 10, 2023
-
-
PG Herveou authored
Small PR that introduce a new crate that will host RISC-V & wasm fixtures for testing pallet-contracts
-
- Nov 09, 2023
-
-
Lulu authored
The staging- rename commit was missing from the last PR for some reason.
-
- Nov 08, 2023
-
-
Sebastian Kunert authored
This PR contains some fixes and cleanups for parachain nodes: 1. When using async backing, node no longer complains about being unable to reach the prospective-parachain subsystem. 2. Parachain warp sync now informs users that the finalized para block has been retrieved. ``` 2023-11-08 13:24:42 [Parachain]
🎉 Received finalized parachain header #5747719 (0xa0aa…674b) from the relay chain. ``` 3. When a user supplied an invalid `--relay-chain-rpc-url`, we were crashing with a very verbose message. Removed the `expect` and improved the error message. ``` 2023-11-08 13:57:56 [Parachain] No valid RPC url found. Stopping RPC worker. 2023-11-08 13:57:56 [Parachain] Essential task `relay-chain-rpc-worker` failed. Shutting down service. Error: Service(Application(WorkerCommunicationError("RPC worker channel closed. This can hint and connectivity issues with the supplied RPC endpoints. Message: oneshot canceled"))) ``` -
Ignacio Palacios authored
Closes: - #1383 - Declared chains can be now be imported and reused in a different crate. - Chain declaration are now generic over a generic type `N` (the Network) - #1389 - Solved #1383, chains and networks declarations can be restructure to avoid having to compile all chains when running integrations tests where are not needed. - Chains are now declared on its own crate (removed from `integration-tests-common`) - Networks are now declared on its own crate (removed from `integration-tests-common`) - Integration tests will import only the relevant Network crate - `integration-tests-common` is renamed to `emulated-integration-tests-common` All this is necessary to be able to implement what is described here: https://github.com/paritytech/roadmap/issues/56#issuecomment-1777010553 --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
Bastian Köcher authored
The trie cache implementation was ignoring the `storage_root` when setting up the value cache. The problem with this is that the value cache works using `storage_keys` and these keys are not unique across different tries. A block can actually have different tries (main trie and multiple child tries). This pull request fixes the issue by not ignoring the `storage_root` and returning an unique `value_cache` per `storage_root`. It also adds a test for the seen bug and improves documentation that this doesn't happen again.
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
`bridge-hub-westend-runtime` was added to cumulus/parachains, but wasn't hooked up to xcm-emulator to run tests against it. This commit addresses that ^. Signed-off-by:
Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
Added a proc macro to be able to write XCMs using the builder pattern. This means we go from having to do this: ```rust let message: Xcm<()> = Xcm(vec![ WithdrawAsset(assets), BuyExecution { fees: asset, weight_limit: Unlimited }, DepositAsset { assets, beneficiary }, ]); ``` to this: ```rust let message: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder() .withdraw_asset(assets) .buy_execution(asset, Unlimited), .deposit_asset(assets, beneficiary) .build(); ``` --------- Co-authored-by:
Keith Yeung <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Nov 06, 2023
-
-
Andrei Sandu authored
**_PR migrated from https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6782_** This PR will upgrade the network protocol to version 3 -> VStaging which will later be renamed to V3. This version introduces a new kind of assignment certificate that will be used for tranche0 assignments. Instead of issuing/importing one tranche0 assignment per candidate, there will be just one certificate per relay chain block per validator. However, we will not be sending out the new assignment certificates, yet. So everything should work exactly as before. Once the majority of the validators have been upgraded to the new protocol version we will enable the new certificates (starting at a specific relay chain block) with a new client update. There are still a few things that need to be done: - [x] Use bitfield instead of Vec<CandidateIndex>: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6802 - [x] Fix existing approval-distribution and approval-voting tests - [x] Fix bitfield-distribution and statement-distribution tests - [x] Fix network bridge tests - [x] Implement todos in the code - [x] Add tests to cover new code - [x] Update metrics - [x] Remove the approval distribution aggression levels: TBD PR - [x] Parachains DB migration - [x] Test network protocol upgrade on Versi - [x] Versi Load test - [x] Add Zombienet test - [x] Documentation updates - [x] Fix for sending DistributeAssignment for each candidate claimed by a v2 assignment (warning: Importing locally an already known assignment) - [x] Fix AcceptedDuplicate - [x] Fix DB migration so that we can still keep old data. - [x] Final Versi burn in --------- Signed-off-by:
Andrei Sandu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by:
Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
-
Michal Kucharczyk authored
This PR updates the version of `serde_json` to `1.0.108` throughout the codebase.
-
- Nov 05, 2023
-
-
Michal Kucharczyk authored
This PR prepares chains specs for _native-runtime-free_ world. This PR has following changes: - `substrate`: - adds support for: - JSON based `GenesisConfig` to `ChainSpec` allowing interaction with runtime `GenesisBuilder` API. - interacting with arbitrary runtime wasm blob to[ `chain-spec-builder`](https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/blob/3ef576eaeb3f42610e85daecc464961cf1295570/bin/utils/chain-spec-builder/src/lib.rs#L46) command line util, - removes [`code`](https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/blob/3ef576eaeb3f42610e85daecc464961cf1295570/frame/system/src/lib.rs#L660) from `system_pallet` - adds `code` to the `ChainSpec` - deprecates [`ChainSpec::from_genesis`](https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/blob/3ef576eaeb3f42610e85daecc464961cf1295570/client/chain-spec/src/chain_spec.rs#L263), but also changes the signature of this method extending it with `code` argument. [`ChainSpec::builder()`](https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/blob/20bee680ed098be7239cf7a6b804cd4de267983e/client/chain-spec/src/chain_spec.rs#L507 ) should be used instead. - `polkadot`: - all references to `RuntimeGenesisConfig` in `node/service` are removed, - all `(kusama|polkadot|versi|rococo|wococo)_(staging|dev)_genesis_config` functions now return the JSON patch for default runtime `GenesisConfig`, - `ChainSpecBuilder` is used, `ChainSpec::from_genesis` is removed, - `cumulus`: - `ChainSpecBuilder` is used, `ChainSpec::from_genesis` is removed, - _JSON_ patch configuration used instead of `RuntimeGenesisConfig struct` in all chain specs. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
Javier Viola <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Davide Galassi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Kevin Krone <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 03, 2023
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
The `BlockBuilderProvider` was a trait that was defined in `sc-block-builder`. The trait was implemented for `Client`. This basically meant that you needed to import `sc-block-builder` any way to have access to the block builder. So, this trait was not providing any real value. This pull request is removing the said trait. Instead of the trait it introduces a builder for creating a `BlockBuilder`. The builder currently has the quite fabulous name `BlockBuilderBuilder` (I'm open to any better name
😅 ). The rest of the pull request is about replacing the old trait with the new builder. # Downstream code changes If you used `new_block` or `new_block_at` before you now need to switch it over to the new `BlockBuilderBuilder` pattern: ```rust // `new` requires a type that implements `CallApiAt`. let mut block_builder = BlockBuilderBuilder::new(client) // Then you need to specify the hash of the parent block the block will be build on top of .on_parent_block(at) // The block builder also needs the block number of the parent block. // Here it is fetched from the given `client` using the `HeaderBackend` // However, there also exists `with_parent_block_number` for directly passing the number .fetch_parent_block_number(client) .unwrap() // Enable proof recording if required. This call is optional. .enable_proof_recording() // Pass the digests. This call is optional. .with_inherent_digests(digests) .build() .expect("Creates new block builder"); ``` --------- Co-authored-by:Sebastian Kunert <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
s0me0ne-unkn0wn authored
-
Alexandru Gheorghe authored
The check_hardware functions does not give us too much information as to what is failing, so let's return the list of failed metrics, so that callers can print it. This would make debugging easier, rather than try to guess which dimension is actually failing. Signed-off-by:
Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
-
Svyatoslav Nikolsky authored
Right now governance could only control byte-fee component of Rococo <> Westend message fees (paid at Asset Hubs). This PR changes it a bit: 1) governance now allowed to control both fee components - byte fee and base fee; 2) base fee now includes cost of "default" delivery and confirmation transactions, in addition to `ExportMessage` instruction cost.
-