Skip to content
  1. Dec 01, 2023
  3. Nov 30, 2023
  5. Nov 29, 2023
  7. Nov 28, 2023
    • Aaro Altonen's avatar
      Rework the event system of `sc-network` (#1370) · e71c484d
      Aaro Altonen authored 
      This commit introduces a new concept called `NotificationService` which
allows Polkadot protocols to communicate with the underlying
notification protocol implementation directly, without routing events
through `NetworkWorker`. This implies that each protocol has its own
service which it uses to communicate with remote peers and that each
`NotificationService` is unique with respect to the underlying
notification protocol, meaning `NotificationService` for the transaction
protocol can only be used to send and receive transaction-related
notifications.

The `NotificationService` concept introduces two additional benefits:
  * allow protocols to start using custom handshakes
  * allow protocols to accept/reject inbound peers

Previously the validation of inbound connections was solely the
responsibility of `ProtocolController`. This caused issues with light
peers and `SyncingEngine` as `ProtocolController` would accept more
peers than `SyncingEngine` could accept which caused peers to have
differing views of their own states. `SyncingEngine` would reject excess
peers but these rejections were not properly communicated to those peers
causing them to assume that they were accepted.

With `NotificationService`, the local handshake is not sent to remote
peer if peer is rejected which allows it to detect that it was rejected.

This commit also deprecates the use of `NetworkEventStream` for all
notification-related events and going forward only DHT events are
provided through `NetworkEventStream`. If protocols wish to follow each
other's events, they must introduce additional abtractions, as is done
for GRANDPA and transactions protocols by following the syncing protocol
through `SyncEventStream`.

Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/512
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/514
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/515
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/554
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/556

---
These changes are transferred from
https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/14197

 but there are no
functional changes compared to that PR

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarDmitry Markin <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexandru Vasile <[email protected]>
      e71c484d
  9. Nov 27, 2023
  11. Nov 25, 2023
  13. Nov 24, 2023
  15. Nov 23, 2023
  17. Nov 22, 2023
  19. Nov 21, 2023
    • Sophia Gold's avatar
      Update tick collator for async backing (#1497) · 50811d6b
      Sophia Gold authored 
      This updates the tick runtime and polkadot-parachain collator to use
async backing.
      50811d6b
    • Francisco Aguirre's avatar
      Different XCM builders, default one requires fee payment (#2253) · b3841b6b
      Francisco Aguirre authored 
      Adding on top of the new builder pattern for creating XCM programs, I'm
adding some more APIs:

```rust
let paying_fees: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder() // Only allow paying for fees
  .withdraw_asset() // First instruction has to load the holding register
  .buy_execution() // Second instruction has to be `buy_execution`
  .build();

let paying_fees_invalid: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder()
  .withdraw_asset()
  .build(); // Invalid, need to pay for fees

let not_paying_fees: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder_unpaid()
  .unpaid_execution() // Needed
  .withdraw_asset()
  .deposit_asset()
  .build();

let all_goes: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder_unsafe() // You can do anything
  .withdraw_asset()
  .deposit_asset()
  .build();
```

The invalid bits are because the methods don't even exist on the types
that you'd want to call them on.

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      b3841b6b
    • Michal Kucharczyk's avatar
      `chain-spec-builder`: cleanup (#2174) · 2fd8c51e
      Michal Kucharczyk authored 
      

This PR removes:
-  `New`, `Generate`, `Edit` commands,
- `kitchensink` dependency
from the `chain-spec-builder` util.

New `convert-to-raw`, `update-code` commands were added.

Additionally renames the `runtime` command (which was added in #1256) to
`create`.

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarSebastian Kunert <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      2fd8c51e
  21. Nov 19, 2023
  23. Nov 18, 2023
  25. Nov 17, 2023
  27. Nov 15, 2023
    • Bastian Köcher's avatar
      frame-system: Add `last_runtime_upgrade_spec_version` (#2351) · ea4085ab
      Bastian Köcher authored 
      

Adds a function for querying the last runtime upgrade spec version. This
can be useful for when writing runtime level migrations to ensure that
they are not executed multiple times. An example would be a session key
migration.

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarLiam Aharon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      ea4085ab
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      [testnet] Remove Wococo stuff from BridgeHubRococo/AssetHubRococo (#2300) · f4bb17cc
      Branislav Kontur authored 
      Rococo<>Wococo bridge is replaced by Rococo<Westend bridge, so this PR
removes unneeded code.

- [x] update bridges subtree after
https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/pull/2692



---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: default avatarSvyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]>
      f4bb17cc
    • Dónal Murray's avatar
      Add `collectives-westend` and `glutton-westend` runtimes (#2024) · 0226b55f
      Dónal Murray authored 
      Add collectives and glutton parachain westend runtimes to prepare for
#1737.

The removal of system parachain native runtimes #1737 is blocked until
chainspecs and runtime APIs can be dealt with cleanly (merge of #1256
and follow up PRs).

In the meantime, these additions are ready to be merged to `master`, so
I have separated them out into this PR.

Also marked `bridge-hub-westend` as unimplemented in line with [this
issue](https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2602

).

TODO
- [x] add to `command-bot` benchmarks
- [x] add to `command-bot-scripts` benchmarks
- [x] generate weights

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarjoe petrowski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarMuharem <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
      0226b55f
    • joe petrowski's avatar
      Identity Deposits Relay to Parachain Migration (#1814) · c79b234b
      joe petrowski authored 
      The goal of this PR is to migrate Identity deposits from the Relay Chain
to a system parachain.

The problem I want to solve is that `IdentityOf` and `SubsOf` both store
an amount that's held in reserve as a storage deposit. When migrating to
a parachain, we can take a snapshot of the actual `IdentityInfo` and
sub-account mappings, but should migrate (off chain) the `deposit`s to
zero, since the chain (and by extension, accounts) won't have any funds
at genesis.

The good news is that we expect parachain deposits to be significantly
lower (possibly 100x) on the parachain. That is, a deposit of 21 DOT on
the Relay Chain would need 0.21 DOT on a parachain. This PR proposes to
migrate the deposits in the following way:

1. Introduces a new pallet with two extrinsics: 
- `reap_identity`: Has a configurable `ReapOrigin`, which would be set
to `EnsureSigned` on the Relay Chain (i.e. callable by anyone) and
`EnsureRoot` on the parachain (we don't want identities reaped from
there).
- `poke_deposit`: Checks what deposit the pallet holds (at genesis,
zero) and attempts to update the amount based on the calculated deposit
for storage data.
2. `reap_identity` clears all storage data for a `target` account and
unreserves their deposit.
3. A `ReapIdentityHandler` teleports the necessary DOT to the parachain
and calls `poke_deposit`. Since the parachain deposit is much lower, and
was just unreserved, we know we have enough.

One awkwardness I ran into was that the XCMv3 instruction set does not
provide a way for the system to teleport assets without a fee being
deducted on reception. Users shouldn't have to pay a fee for the system
to migrate their info to a more efficient location. So I wrote my own
program and did the `InitiateTeleport` accounting on my own to send a
program with `UnpaidExecution`. Have discussed an
`InitiateUnpaidTeleport` instruction with @franciscoaguirre . Obviously
any chain executing this would have to pass a `Barrier` for free
execution.

TODO:

- [x] Confirm People Chain ParaId
- [x] Confirm People Chain deposit rates (determined in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2281

)
- [x] Add pallet to Westend

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      c79b234b
  29. Nov 14, 2023