- Jan 23, 2025
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
This PR contains small fixes identified during work on the larger PR: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/6906. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
runcomet authored
# Derived Dev Accounts Resolves https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/6040 ## Description This update introduces support for creating an arbitrary number of developer accounts at the genesis block based on a specified derivation path. This functionality is gated by the runtime-benchmarks feature, ensuring it is only enabled during benchmarking scenarios. ### Key Features - Arbitrary Dev Accounts at Genesis: Developers can now specify any number of accounts to be generated at genesis using a hard derivation path. - Default Derivation Path: If no derivation path is provided (i.e., when `Option<dev_accounts: (..., None)>` is set to `Some` at genesis), the system will default to the path `//Sender//{}`. - No Impact on Total Token Issuance: Developer accounts are excluded from the total issuance of the token supply at genesis, ensuring they do not affect the overall balance or token distribution....
-
- Jan 20, 2025
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
This PR addresses a few minor issues found while working on the polkadot-fellows PR [https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/522](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/522): - Incorrect generic type for `InboundLaneData` in `check_message_lane_weights`. - Renaming leftovers: `assigner_on_demand` -> `on_demand`.
-
- Jan 16, 2025
-
-
chloefeal authored
✄ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for your Pull Request!
Please make sure it follows the contribution guidelines outlined in [this document](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/docs/contributor/CONTRIBUTING.md) and fill out the sections below. Once you're ready to submit your PR for review, please delete this section and leave only the text under the "Description" heading. # Description Hello, I fix some typos in logs and comments. Thank you very much. ## Integration *In depth notes about how this PR should be integrated by downstream projects. This part is mandatory, and should be reviewed by reviewers, if the PR does NOT have the `R0-Silent` label. In case of a `R0-Silent`, it can be ignored.* ## Review Notes *In depth notes about the **implementation** details of your PR. This should be the main guide for reviewers to understand your approach and effectively review it. If too long, use [`<details>`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/details)*. *Imagine that someone who is depending on the old code wants to integrate your new code and the only information that they get is this section. It helps to include example usage and default value here, with a `diff` code-block to show possibly integration.* *Include your leftover TODOs, if any, here.* # Checklist * [ ] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the "Description" and its two subsections above. * [ ] My PR follows the [labeling requirements]( https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/docs/contributor/CONTRIBUTING.md#Process ) of this project (at minimum one label for `T` required) * External contributors: ask maintainers to put the right label on your PR. * [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if applicable) * [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if applicable) You can remove the "Checklist" section once all have been checked. Thank you for your contribution! ✄ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Signed-off-by:chloefeal <188809157+chloefeal@users.noreply.github.com>
-
- Jan 07, 2025
-
-
Alistair Singh authored
Changes: 1. Use the 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 token address as Native ETH. 2. Convert it to/from `{ parents: 2, interior: X1(GlobalConsensus(Ethereum{chain_id: 1})) }` when encountered. Onchain changes: This will require a governance request to register native ETH (with the above location) in the foreign assets pallet and make it sufficient. Related solidity changes: https://github.com/Snowfork/snowbridge/pull/1354 TODO: - [x] Emulated Tests --------- Co-authored-by:
Vincent Geddes <117534+vgeddes@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <info@kchr.de>
-
- Jan 06, 2025
-
-
jasmy authored
Co-authored-by:
Dónal Murray <donal.murray@parity.io>
-
- Dec 20, 2024
-
-
Xavier Lau authored
It doesn't make sense to only reorder the features array. For example: This makes it hard for me to compare the dependencies and features, especially some crates have a really really long dependencies list. ```toml [dependencies] c = "*" a = "*" b = "*" [features] std = [ "a", "b", "c", ] ``` This makes my life easier. ```toml [dependencies] a = "*" b = "*" c = "*" [features] std = [ "a", "b", "c", ] ``` --------- Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Dec 12, 2024
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Dec 11, 2024
-
-
Alexander Theißen authored
I am planning to use `alloy_core` to implement precompile support in `pallet_revive`. I noticed that it is already used by snowbridge. In order to unify the dependencies I did the following: 1. Switch to the `alloy-core` umbrella crate so that we have less individual dependencies to update. 2. Bump the latest version and fixup the resulting compile errors.
-
- Dec 10, 2024
-
-
Ron authored
## Description Our smoke tests transfer `WETH` from Sepolia to Westend-AssetHub breaks, try to reregister `WETH` on AH but fails as following: https://bridgehub-westend.subscan.io/xcm_message/westend-4796d6b3600aca32ef63b9953acf6a456cfd2fbe https://assethub-westend.subscan.io/extrinsic/9731267-0?event=9731267-2 The reason is that the transact call encoded on BH to register the asset https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/a77940ba /bridges/snowbridge/primitives/router/src/inbound/mod.rs#L282-L289 ``` 0x3500020209079edaa8020300fff9976782d46cc05630d1f6ebab18b2324d6b1400ce796ae65569a670d0c1cc1ac12515a3ce21b5fbf729d63d7b289baad070139d01000000000000000000000000000000 ``` the `asset_id` which is the xcm location can't be decoded on AH in V5 Issue initial post in https://matrix.to/#/!qUtSTcfMJzBdPmpFKa:parity.io/$RNMAxIIOKGtBAqkgwiFuQf4eNaYpmOK-Pfw4d6vv1aU?via=parity.io&via=matrix.org&via=web3.foundation --------- Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
-
Joseph Zhao authored
Close: #5858 --------- Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
-
Branislav Kontur authored
Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/5551 ## Description With [permissionless lanes PR#4949](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/4949), the congestion mechanism based on sending `Transact(report_bridge_status(is_congested))` from `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub` to `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router` was replaced with a congestion mechanism that relied on monitoring XCMP queues. However, this approach could cause issues, such as suspending the entire XCMP queue instead of isolating the affected bridge. This PR reverts back to using `report_bridge_status` as before. ## TODO - [x] benchmarks - [x] prdoc ## Follow-up https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/6231 --------- Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
We removed the `require_weight_at_most` field and later changed it to `fallback_max_weight`. This was to have a fallback when sending a message to v4 chains, which happens in the small time window when chains are upgrading. We originally put no fallback for a message in snowbridge's inbound queue but we should have one. This PR adds it. --------- Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com>
-
- Dec 09, 2024
-
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
# Description Sending XCM messages to other chains requires paying a "transport fee". This can be paid either: - from `origin` local account if `jit_withdraw = true`, - taken from Holding register otherwise. This currently works for following hops/scenarios: 1. On destination no transport fee needed (only sending costs, not receiving), 2. Local/originating chain: just set JIT=true and fee will be paid from signed account, 3. Intermediary hops - only if intermediary is acting as reserve between two untrusted chains (aka only for `DepositReserveAsset` instruction) - this was fixed in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3142 But now we're seeing more complex asset transfers that are mixing reserve transfers with teleports depending on the involved chains. # Example E.g. transferring DOT between Relay and parachain, but through AH (using AH instead of the Relay chain as parachain's DOT reserve). In the `Parachain --1--> AssetHub --2--> Relay` scenario, DOT has to be reserve-withdrawn in leg `1`, then teleported in leg `2`. On the intermediary hop (AssetHub), `InitiateTeleport` fails to send onward message because of missing transport fees. We also can't rely on `jit_withdraw` because the original origin is lost on the way, and even if it weren't we can't rely on the user having funded accounts on each hop along the way. # Solution/Changes - Charge the transport fee in the executor from the transferred assets (if available), - Only charge from transferred assets if JIT_WITHDRAW was not set, - Only charge from transferred assets if unless using XCMv5 `PayFees` where we do not have this problem. # Testing Added regression tests in emulated transfers. Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4832 Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/6637 --------- Signed-off-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
-
- Dec 08, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
Last feature we wanted for V5, changing `SetAssetClaimer` to be just one of many possible "hints" that you can specify at the beginning of your program to change its behaviour. This makes it easier to add new hints in the future and have barriers accept them. --------- Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com>
-
- Dec 05, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/6585 Removing the `require_weight_at_most` parameter in V5 Transact had only one problem. Converting a message from V5 to V4 to send to chains that didn't upgrade yet. The conversion would not know what weight to give to the Transact, since V4 and below require it. To fix this, I added back the weight in the form of an `Option<Weight>` called `fallback_max_weight`. This can be set to `None` if you don't intend to deal with a chain that hasn't upgraded yet. If you set it to `Some(_)`, the behaviour is the same. The plan is to totally remove this in V6 since there will be a good conversion path from V6 to V5. --------- Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
-
- Dec 03, 2024
-
-
Lulu authored
-
Serban Iorga authored
-
- Nov 28, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
Previously, we added multi-instance pallet support for `pallet-bridge-relayers`, but missed fixing it in this one place. --------- Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
-
- Nov 20, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
This PR includes: - Refactored integrity tests to support standalone deployment of `pallet-bridge-messages`. - Refactored the `open_and_close_bridge_works` test case to support multiple scenarios, such as: 1. A local chain opening a bridge. 2. Sibling parachains opening a bridge. 3. The relay chain opening a bridge. - Previously, we added instance support for `pallet-bridge-relayer` but overlooked updating the `DeliveryConfirmationPaymentsAdapter`. --------- Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com>
-
- Nov 14, 2024
-
-
georgepisaltu authored
Follow up to https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3685 Partially fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/6403 The main PR introduced bare support for the new extension version byte as well as extension weights and benchmarking. This PR: - Removes the redundant extension version byte from the signed v4 extrinsic, previously unused and defaulted to 0. - Adds the extension version byte to the inherited implication passed to `General` transactions. - Whitelists the `pallet_authorship::Author`, `frame_system::Digest` and `pallet_transaction_payment::NextFeeMultiplier` storage items as they are read multiple times by extensions for each transaction, but are hot in memory and currently overestimate the weight. - Whitelists the benchmark caller for `CheckEra` and `CheckGenesis` as the reads are performed for every transaction and overestimate the weight. - Updates the umbrella frame weight...
-
- Nov 13, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/6449
-
thiolliere authored
[Tx ext stage 2: 1/4] Add `TransactionSource` as argument in `TransactionExtension::validate` (#6323) ## Meta This PR is part of 4 PR: * https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/6323 * https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/6324 * https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/6325 * https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/6326 ## Description One goal of transaction extension is to get rid or unsigned transactions. But unsigned transaction validation has access to the `TransactionSource`. The source is used for unsigned transactions that the node trust and don't want to pay upfront. Instead of using transaction source we could do: the transaction is valid if it is signed by the block author, conceptually it should work, but it doesn't look so easy. This PR add `TransactionSource` to the validate function for transaction extensions
-
- Nov 06, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
# Context This PR aims to introduce XCMv5, for now it's in progress and will be updated over time. This branch will serve as a milestone branch for merging in all features we want to add to XCM, roughly outlined [here](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/xcm-format/issues/60). More features could be added. ## TODO - [x] Migrate foreign assets from v3 to v4 - [x] Setup v5 skeleton - [x] Remove XCMv2 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5390 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5585 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5420 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5876 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5971 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/6148 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/6228 Fixes #3434 Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4190 Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/5209 Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/5241 Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4284 --------- Signed-off-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Andrii <ndk@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Joseph Zhao <65984904+programskillforverification@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
Nazar Mokrynskyi <nazar@mokrynskyi.com> Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by:
Shawn Tabrizi <shawntabrizi@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by:
Serban Iorga <serban@parity.io>
-
- Nov 05, 2024
-
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
Remove references of now defunct Wococo network. The XCM `NetworkId::Wococo` will also be removed with [XCMv5 PR](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/4826)
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
Replace `GlobalConsensusEthereumConvertsFor` with `EthereumLocationsConverterFor` that allows `Location` to `AccountId` conversion for the Ethereum network root as before, but also for Ethereum contracts and accounts. The new converter only matches explicit `parents: 2` Ethereum locations, meaning it should be used only on/by parachains.
-
- Oct 24, 2024
-
-
Alistair Singh authored
# Description Snowbridge PNA has been audited. A number of issues where raised due to not understanding the fee model for Polkadot Native Assets(PNA) implementation. This PR addresses this by adding more comments and better naming of private functions. ## Integration None, documentation and private method name changes.
-
Serban Iorga authored
Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/6161 Westend BridgeHub freezes for a while at block 3 and if we try to init the bridge and fund the accounts during that time, it fails. So we wait untill all the parachains produced at least 10 blocks, in order to make sure that they work reliably.
-
- Oct 18, 2024
-
-
georgepisaltu authored
Original PR https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2280 reverted in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3665 This PR reintroduces the reverted functionality with additional changes, related effort [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3623). Description is copied over from the original PR First part of [Extrinsic Horizon](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2415) Introduces a new trait `TransactionExtension` to replace `SignedExtension`. Introduce the idea of transactions which obey the runtime's extensions and have according Extension data (né Extra data) yet do not have hard-coded signatures. Deprecate the terminology of "Unsigned" when used for transactions/extrinsics owing to there now being "proper" unsigned transactions which obey the extension framework and "old-style" unsigned which do not. Instead we have __*General*__ for the former and __*Bare*__ for ...
-
- Oct 17, 2024
-
-
drewstone authored
# Description I'm unable to build a bridge library due to the errors below, so I am adding the explicit import to `sp_std::vec`. ## Integration Projects using it can update their dependency. We are using the branch `stable2407` (mixed them up in my branch). ## Errors ``` error: cannot find macro `vec` in this scope --> /Users/drew/.cargo/git/checkouts/polkadot-sdk-cff69157b985ed76/88c32501/bridges/primitives/header-chain/src/justification/verification/mod.rs:99:19 | 99 | let mut route = vec![]; | ^^^ | help: consider importing one of these items | 23 + use scale_info::prelude::vec; | 23 + use sp_std::vec; | error: cannot find macro `vec` in this scope --> /Users/drew/.cargo/git/checkouts/polkadot-sdk-cff69157b985ed76/88c32501/bridges/primitives/header-chain/src/justification/verification/optimizer.rs:135:36 | 135 | duplicate_votes_ancestries_idxs: vec![], | ...
-
- Oct 10, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
# Description This PR addresses https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/5878. After dry running an xcm on asset hub, we had redundant xcms showing up in the `forwarded_xcms` field of the dry run effects returned. These were caused by two things: - The `UpwardMessageSender` router always added an element even if there were no messages. - The two routers on asset hub westend related to bridging (to rococo and sepolia) getting the message from their queues when their queues is actually the same xcmp queue that was already contemplated. In order to fix this, we check for no messages in UMP and clear the implementation of `InspectMessageQueues` for these bridging routers. Keep in mind that the bridged message is still sent, as normal via the xcmp-queue to Bridge Hub. To keep on dry-running the journey of the message, the next hop to dry-run is Bridge Hub. That'll be tackled in a different PR. Added a test in `bridge-hub-westend-integration-tests` and `bridge-hub-rococo-integration-tests` that show that dry-running a transfer across the bridge from asset hub results in one and only one message sent to bridge hub. ## TODO - [x] Functionality - [x] Test --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Oct 09, 2024
-
-
Vincent Geddes authored
Here are MD docs for V2 @acatangiu @franciscoaguirre . Let me know what you think. --------- Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Alistair Singh <alistair.singh7@gmail.com>
-
- Oct 08, 2024
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
This bumps `ethbloom`, `ethereum-types`, `primitive-types` and `rlp` to their latest version. Fixes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/5870 --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
ggwpez <ggwpez@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Shawn Tabrizi <shawntabrizi@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Dónal Murray <donal.murray@parity.io>
-
- Oct 07, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
This PR adds the ability to start version guarding when performing standalone relaying of messages and parachains. ## Follow-up - decouple and simplify `fn start_relay_guards`: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/5923 --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Oct 05, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
For permissionless lanes, we add `lane_state` to the `InboundLaneData` and `OutboundLaneData` structs. However, for a period of time (until both BHK and BHP are upgraded to the same version), we need the relayer to function with runtimes where one has been migrated with `lane_state` and the other has not. This PR addresses the incompatibility by introducing wrapper structs for decoding without `lane_state`.
-
- Oct 04, 2024
-
-
Clara van Staden authored
# Description The EthereumBlobExporter consumes the `dest` parameter when the destination is not `Here`. Subsequent exporters will receive a `None` value for the destination instead of the original destination value, which is incorrect. Closes #5788 ## Integration Minor fix related to the exporter behaviour. ## Review Notes Verified that tests `exporter_validate_with_invalid_dest_does_not_alter_destination` and `exporter_validate_with_invalid_universal_source_does_not_alter_universal_source` fail without the fix in the exporter. --------- Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
-
Branislav Kontur authored
Relates to: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5916 Relates to: https://github.com/polkadot-js/api/pull/5976 --------- Co-authored-by:
Javier Viola <javier@parity.io>
-
- Oct 03, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
This PR removes the requirement to set the `LaneId` in the relayer CLI configuration where it was not really necessary. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Sep 26, 2024
-
-
Alexander Samusev authored
cc https://github.com/paritytech/ci_cd/issues/1035 cc https://github.com/paritytech/ci_cd/issues/1023 --------- Signed-off-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
Maksym H <1177472+mordamax@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
gui <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by:
ggwpez <ggwpez@users.noreply.github.com>
-
- Sep 24, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
This PR primarily fixes the issue with `zombienet-bridges-0001-asset-transfer-works` (see: https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/7404903). The PR looks large, but most of the changes involve splitting `LaneId` into `LegacyLaneId` and `HashedLaneId`. All pallets now use `LaneId` as a generic parameter. The actual bridging pallets are now backward compatible and work with actual **substrate-relay v1.6.10**, which does not even known anything about permissionless lanes or the new pallet changes. ## Important - [x] added migration for `pallet_bridge_relayers` and `RewardsAccountParams` change order of params, which generates different accounts ## Deployment follow ups - [ ] fix monitoring for `at_{}_relay_{}_reward_for_msgs_from_{}_on_lane_{}` - [ ] check sovereign reward accounts - because of changed `RewardsAccountParams` - [ ] deploy another messages instances for permissionless lanes - on BHs or AHs? - [ ] return back `open_and_close_bridge_works` for another `pallet-bridge-messages` instance --------- Signed-off-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
-