Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Feb 24, 2025
  2. Feb 21, 2025
  3. Feb 20, 2025
    • PG Herveou's avatar
      [pallet-revive] tracing improvements (#7614) · 9e75647c
      PG Herveou authored
      
      Various pallet-revive improvements
      
      - add check for precompiles addresses,
      So we can easily identify which one are being called and not supported
      yet
      
      - fixes debug_call for revert call
      If a call revert we still want to get the traces for that call, that
      matches geth behaviors, diff tests will be added to the test suite for
      this
      
      - fixes traces for staticcall
      The call type was not always being reported properly.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarcmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexander Theißen <alex.theissen@me.com>
    • Alexander Theißen's avatar
      Update to Rust stable 1.84.1 (#7625) · e2d3da61
      Alexander Theißen authored
      Ref https://github.com/paritytech/ci_cd/issues/1107
      
      We mainly need that so that we can finally compile the `pallet_revive`
      fixtures on stable. I did my best to keep the commits focused on one
      thing to make review easier.
      
      All the changes are needed because rustc introduced more warnings or is
      more strict about existing ones. Most of the stuff could just be fixed
      and the commits should be pretty self explanatory. However, there are a
      few this that are notable:
      
      ## `non_local_definitions `
      
      A lot of runtimes to write `impl` blocks inside functions. This makes
      sense to reduce the amount of conditional compilation. I guess I could
      have moved them into a module instead. But I think allowing it here
      makes sense to avoid the code churn.
      
      ## `unexpected_cfgs`
      
      The FRAME macros emit code that references various features like `std`,
      `runtime-benchmarks` or `try-runtime`. If a create that uses those
      macros does not have those features we get this warning. Those were
      mostly when ...
    • Francisco Aguirre's avatar
      Update dispatchables doc link in pallet-revive's README (#7624) · f2414398
      Francisco Aguirre authored
      Pallet-revive's README has an outdated link for dispatchables
      documentation in its README. It was giving 404. Put the up-to-date one.
  4. Feb 18, 2025
  5. Feb 17, 2025
  6. Feb 14, 2025
  7. Feb 12, 2025
  8. Feb 10, 2025
  9. Feb 08, 2025
  10. Feb 07, 2025
  11. Feb 06, 2025
    • PG Herveou's avatar
      [pallet-revive] tx fee fixes (#7463) · 917052e5
      PG Herveou authored
      
      Apply some fixes to properly estimate ethereum tx fees:
      
      - Set the `extension_weight` on the dispatch_info to properly calculate
      the fee with pallet_transaction_payment
      - Expose the gas_price through Runtime API, just in case we decide to
      tweak the value in future updates, it should be read from the chain
      rather than be a shared constant exposed by the crate
      - add a `evm_gas_to_fee` utility function to properly convert gas to
      substrate fee
      - Fix some minor gas encoding for edge cases
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarcmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
  12. Feb 04, 2025
    • Alexander Theißen's avatar
      revive: Include immutable storage deposit into the contracts `storage_base_deposit` (#7230) · 4c28354b
      Alexander Theißen authored
      
      This PR is centered around a main fix regarding the base deposit and a
      bunch of drive by or related fixtures that make sense to resolve in one
      go. It could be broken down more but I am constantly rebasing this PR
      and would appreciate getting those fixes in as-one.
      
      **This adds a multi block migration to Westend AssetHub that wipes the
      pallet state clean. This is necessary because of the changes to the
      `ContractInfo` storage item. It will not delete the child storage
      though. This will leave a tiny bit of garbage behind but won't cause any
      problems. They will just be orphaned.**
      
      ## Record the deposit for immutable data into the `storage_base_deposit`
      
      The `storage_base_deposit` are all the deposit a contract has to pay for
      existing. It included the deposit for its own metadata and a deposit
      proportional (< 1.0x) to the size of its code. However, the immutable
      code size was not recorded there. This would lead to the situation where
      on terminate this portion wouldn't be refunded staying locked into the
      contract. It would also make the calculation of the deposit changes on
      `set_code_hash` more complicated when it updates the immutable data (to
      be done in #6985). Reason is because it didn't know how much was payed
      before since the storage prices could have changed in the mean time.
      
      In order for this solution to work I needed to delay the deposit
      calculation for a new contract for after the contract is done executing
      is constructor as only then we know the immutable data size. Before, we
      just charged this eagerly in `charge_instantiate` before we execute the
      constructor. Now, we merely send the ED as free balance before the
      constructor in order to create the account. After the constructor is
      done we calculate the contract base deposit and charge it. This will
      make `set_code_hash` much easier to implement.
      
      As a side effect it is now legal to call `set_immutable_data` multiple
      times per constructor (even though I see no reason to do so). It simply
      overrides the immutable data with the new value. The deposit accounting
      will be done after the constructor returns (as mentioned above) instead
      of when setting the immutable data.
      
      ## Don't pre-charge for reading immutable data
      
      I noticed that we were pre-charging weight for the max allowable
      immutable data when reading those values and then refunding after read.
      This is not necessary as we know its length without reading the storage
      as we store it out of band in contract metadata. This makes reading it
      free. Less pre-charging less problems.
      
      ## Remove delegate locking
      
      Fixes #7092
      
      This is also in the spirit of making #6985 easier to implement. The
      locking complicates `set_code_hash` as we might need to block settings
      the code hash when locks exist. Check #7092 for further rationale.
      
      ## Enforce "no terminate in constructor" eagerly
      
      We used to enforce this rule after the contract execution returned. Now
      we error out early in the host call. This makes it easier to be sure to
      argue that a contract info still exists (wasn't terminated) when a
      constructor successfully returns. All around this his just much simpler
      than dealing this check.
      
      ## Moved refcount functions to `CodeInfo`
      
      They never really made sense to exist on `Stack`. But now with the
      locking gone this makes even less sense. The refcount is stored inside
      `CodeInfo` to lets just move them there.
      
      ## Set `CodeHashLockupDepositPercent` for test runtime
      
      The test runtime was setting `CodeHashLockupDepositPercent` to zero.
      This was trivializing many code paths and excluded them from testing. I
      set it to `30%` which is our default value and fixed up all the tests
      that broke. This should give us confidence that the lockup doeposit
      collections properly works.
      
      ## Reworked the `MockExecutable` to have both a `deploy` and a `call`
      entry point
      
      This type used for testing could only have either entry points but not
      both. In order to fix the `immutable_data_set_overrides` I needed to a
      new function `add_both` to `MockExecutable` that allows to have both
      entry points. Make sure to make use of it in the future :)
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarcmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarPG Herveou <pgherveou@gmail.com>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
  13. Feb 03, 2025
  14. Jan 29, 2025
  15. Jan 28, 2025
  16. Jan 24, 2025
  17. Jan 23, 2025
    • runcomet's avatar
      Balances: Configurable Number of Genesis Accounts with Specified Balances for Benchmarking (#6267) · 04847d51
      runcomet authored
      # Derived Dev Accounts
      
      Resolves https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/6040
      
      ## Description
      This update introduces support for creating an arbitrary number of
      developer accounts at the genesis block based on a specified derivation
      path. This functionality is gated by the runtime-benchmarks feature,
      ensuring it is only enabled during benchmarking scenarios.
      
      ### Key Features
      - Arbitrary Dev Accounts at Genesis: Developers can now specify any
      number of accounts to be generated at genesis using a hard derivation
      path.
      
      - Default Derivation Path: If no derivation path is provided (i.e., when
      `Option<dev_accounts: (..., None)>` is set to `Some` at genesis), the
      system will default to the path `//Sender//{}`.
      
      - No Impact on Total Token Issuance: Developer accounts are excluded
      from the total issuance of the token supply at genesis, ensuring they do
      not affect the overall balance or token distribution....
    • PG Herveou's avatar
      [pallet-revive] fee estimation fixes (#7281) · 5772b9db
      PG Herveou authored
      - Fix the EVM fee cost estimation.
      The estimation shown in EVM wallet was using Native instead of EVM
      decimals
      - Remove the precise code length estimation in dry run call.
      Over-estimating is fine, since extra gas is refunded anyway.
      - Ensure that the estimated fee calculated from gas_price x gas use the
      encoded weight & deposit limit instead of the exact one calculated by
      the dry-run. Else we can end up with a fee that is lower than the actual
      fee paid by the user
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
  18. Jan 20, 2025
  19. Jan 17, 2025
  20. Jan 15, 2025
  21. Jan 14, 2025
    • PG Herveou's avatar
      [pallet-revive-eth-rpc] persist eth transaction hash (#6836) · 023763da
      PG Herveou authored
      Add an option to persist EVM transaction hash to a SQL db.
      This should make it possible to run a full archive ETH RPC node
      (assuming the substrate node is also a full archive node)
      
      Some queries such as eth_getTransactionByHash,
      eth_getBlockTransactionCountByHash, and other need to work with a
      transaction hash indexes, which are not stored in Substrate and need to
      be stored by the eth-rpc proxy.
      
      The refactoring break down the Client into a `BlockInfoProvider` and
      `ReceiptProvider`
      - BlockInfoProvider does not need any persistence data, as we can fetch
      all block info from the source substrate chain
      - ReceiptProvider comes in two flavor, 
        - An in memory cache implementation - This is the one we had so far.
      - A DB implementation - This one persist rows with the block_hash, the
      transaction_index and the transaction_hash, so that we can later fetch
      the block and extrinsic for that receipt and reconstruct the ReceiptInfo
      object.
      
      This PR also adds ...
  22. Jan 13, 2025
    • PG Herveou's avatar
      [pallet-revive] Update gas encoding (#6689) · ba572ae8
      PG Herveou authored
      
      Update the current approach to attach the `ref_time`, `pov` and
      `deposit` parameters to an Ethereum transaction.
      Previously we will pass these 3 parameters along with the signed
      payload, and check that the fees resulting from `gas x gas_price` match
      the actual fees paid by the user for the extrinsic.
      
      This approach unfortunately can be attacked. A malicious actor could
      force such a transaction to fail by injecting low values for some of
      these extra parameters as they are not part of the signed payload.
      
      The new approach encodes these 3 extra parameters in the lower digits of
      the transaction gas, approximating the the log2 of the actual values to
      encode each components on 2 digits
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarGitHub Action <action@github.com>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>