- Apr 20, 2024
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
-
Ankan authored
This is the first PR in preparation for https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/454. ## Follow ups: - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3904. - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3905. Overall changes are documented here (lot more visual
😍 ): https://hackmd.io/@ak0n/454-np-governance [Maybe followup](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4217) with migration of storage item `VirtualStakers` as a bool or enum in `Ledger`. ## Context We want to achieve a way for a user (`Delegator`) to delegate their funds to another account (`Agent`). Delegate implies the funds are locked in delegator account itself. Agent can act on behalf of delegator to stake directly on Staking pallet. The delegation feature is added to Staking via another pallet `delegated-staking` worked on [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3904). ## Introduces: ### StakingUnchecked Trait As the name implies, this trait allows unchecked (non-locked) mutation of staking ledger. These apis are only meant to be used by other pallets in the runtime and should not be exposed directly to user code path. Also related: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3888. ### Virtual Bond Allows other pallets to stake via staking pallet while managing the locks on these accounts themselves. Introduces another storage `VirtualStakers` that whitelist these accounts. We also restrict virtual stakers to set reward account as themselves. Since the account has no locks, we cannot support compounding of rewards. Conservatively, we require them to set a separate account different from the staker. Since these are code managed, it should be easy for another pallet to redistribute reward and rebond them. ### Slashes Since there is no actual lock maintained by staking-pallet for virtual stakers, this pallet does not apply any slashes. It is then important for pallets managing virtual stakers to listen to slashing events and apply necessary slashes.
-
- Apr 19, 2024
-
-
maksimryndin authored
follow up of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2604 closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2604 - [x] take relevant changes from Marcin's PR - [x] extract common duplicate code for workers (low-hanging fruits) ~Some unpassed ci problems are more general and should be fixed in master (see https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/4074)~ Proposed labels: **T0-node**, **R0-silent**, **I4-refactor** ----- kusama address: FZXVQLqLbFV2otNXs6BMnNch54CFJ1idpWwjMb3Z8fTLQC6 --------- Co-authored-by: s0me0ne-unkn0wn <[email protected]>
-
Alexandru Vasile authored
This PR stabilizes the txBroadcast API to version 1. Needs from spec: - https://github.com/paritytech/json-rpc-interface-spec/pull/153 - https://github.com/paritytech/json-rpc-interface-spec/pull/154 cc @paritytech/subxt-team --------- Signed-off-by: Alexandru Vasile <[email protected]>
-
Alexandru Vasile authored
This PR stabilizes the txBroadcast API to version 1. Ideally needs: - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/4050 - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3772 cc @paritytech/subxt-team --------- Signed-off-by: Alexandru Vasile <[email protected]>
-
Bulat Saifullin authored
Some Rococo parachains lacked WS nodes. `ws/wss` endpoints are necessary for using light clients on the testnet. Changes: 1. Add `ws/wss` endpoints to all testnet parachains. 2. Remove decommissioned nodes (`people-collator-node-2` `people-collator-node-3` ).
-
Svyatoslav Nikolsky authored
-
Andrei Sandu authored
Related to https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4126 discussion Currently all preparations have same priority and this is not ideal in all cases. This change should improve the finality time in the context of on-demand parachains and when `ExecutorParams` are updated on-chain and a rebuild of all artifacts is required. The desired effect is to speed up approval and dispute PVF executions which require preparation and delay backing executions which require preparation. --------- Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>
-
Andrei Eres authored
- Returned latency (with it, results are more stable) - The threshold is weakened - Increased number of runs
-
Alexandru Vasile authored
This PR limits the number of active calls to the transactionBroadcast APIs to 16. cc @paritytech/subxt-team Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3081 --------- Signed-off-by: Alexandru Vasile <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: James Wilson <[email protected]>
-
- Apr 18, 2024
-
-
Alexandru Vasile authored
This PR stabilizes the chainHead API to version 1. Needs: - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3667 cc @paritytech/subxt-team --------- Signed-off-by: Alexandru Vasile <[email protected]>
-
Alexandru Vasile authored
This PR ensures that broadcast future cleans-up the submitted extrinsic from the pool, iff the `broadcast_stop` operation has been called. This effectively cleans-up transactions from the pool when the `broadcast_stop` is called. cc @paritytech/subxt-team --------- Signed-off-by: Alexandru Vasile <[email protected]>
-
Alexandru Gheorghe authored
approval-voting: Make sure we always mark approved candidates approved in a different relay chain context (#4153) ... see for more detail why this is needed https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4149#issuecomment-2058472444 ## TODO: - [x] Unittests - [x] Replicate scenario from https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4149 and confirm this fixes it: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4149 [ Replicated on a zombienet with some hacked nodes, that we can end up in this state where no-wake is schedule and the nodes are pending new assignments] --------- Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>
-
Alexandru Gheorghe authored
The `next_retry_time` gets populated when a request receives an error timeout or any other error, after thatn next_retry would check all requests in the queue returns the smallest one, which then gets used to move the main loop by creating a Delay ``` futures_timer::Delay::new(instant.saturating_duration_since(Instant::now())).await, ``` However when we retry a task for the first time we still keep it in the queue an mark it as in flight so its next_retry_time would be the oldest and it would be small than `now`, so the Delay will always triggers, so that would make the main loop essentially busy wait untill we received a response for the retry request. Fix this by excluding the tasks that are already in-flight. --------- Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>
-
Alexander Samusev authored
More details can be found [here](https://github.com/paritytech/ci_cd/issues/939#issuecomment-2064061845)
-
Alexander Samusev authored
close https://github.com/paritytech/ci_cd/issues/974
-
Egor_P authored
This PR adds description to each of the sections of the Changelog part. Changes are based on feedback that it wasn't that clear what exactly `Node Dev`, `Runtime Dev` etc. means. Now, the description for each of those parts is taken directly from the `prdoc` schema. Closes https://github.com/paritytech/release-engineering/issues/197
-
Alexander Samusev authored
cc https://github.com/paritytech/ci_cd/issues/974 --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
Alexander Samusev authored
PR adds `test-linux-stable-int` and `quick-benchmarks` as github action jobs. It's a copy of `test-linux-stable-int` and `quick-benchmarks` from gitlab ci and now it's needed to make a stress test for self-hosted github runners. `test-linux-stable-int` and `quick-benchmarks` in gitlab are still `Required` whereas this workflow is allowed to fail. cc https://github.com/paritytech/infrastructure/issues/46
-
Tin Chung authored
# Description - Link to issue: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3651 polkadot address: 19nSqFQorfF2HxD3oBzWM3oCh4SaCRKWt1yvmgaPYGCo71J
-
- Apr 17, 2024
-
-
Muharem Ismailov authored
Introduce `touch` call designed to address operational prerequisites before providing liquidity to a pool. This function ensures that essential requirements, such as the presence of the pool's accounts, are fulfilled. It is particularly beneficial in scenarios where a pool creator removes the pool's accounts without providing liquidity. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
PG Herveou authored
- Moved `substrate/frame/contracts/src/tests/builder.rs` into a pub test_utils module, so we can use that in the `pallet-contracts-mock-network` tests - Refactor xcm tests to use XCM builders, and simplify the use case for xcm-send
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
Preparation for https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3935 Changes: - Add some `default-features = false` for the case that a crate and that dependency both support nostd builds. - Shuffle files around of some benchmarking-only crates. These conditionally disabled the `cfg_attr` for nostd and pulled in libstd. Example [here](https://github.com/ggwpez/zepter/pull/95). The actual logic is moved into a `inner.rs` to preserve nostd capability of the crate in case the benchmarking feature is disabled. - Add some `use sp_std::vec` where needed. - Remove some `optional = true` in cases where it was not optional. - Removed one superfluous `cfg_attr(not(feature = "std"), no_std..`. All in all this should be logical no-op. --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
-
Alexandru Vasile authored
This PR ensures that the reported pruned blocks are unique. While at it, ensure that the best block event is properly generated when the last best block is a fork that will be pruned in the future. To achieve this, the chainHead keeps a LRU set of reported pruned blocks to ensure the following are not reported twice: ```bash finalized -> block 1 -> block 2 -> block 3 -> block 2 -> block 4 -> block 5 -> block 1 -> block 2_f -> block 6 -> block 7 -> block 8 ``` When block 7 is finalized the branch [block 2; block 3] is reported as pruned. When block 8 is finalized the branch [block 2; block 4; block 5] should be reported as pruned, however block 2 was already reported as pruned at the previous step. This is a side-effect of the pruned blocks being reported at level N - 1. For example, if all pruned forks would be reported with the first encounter (when block 6 is finalized we know that block 3 and block 5 are stale), we would not need the LRU cache. cc @paritytech/subxt-team Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3658 --------- Signed-off-by: Alexandru Vasile <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sebastian Kunert <[email protected]>
-
thiolliere authored
Improve doc: * the pallet macro is actually referring to 2 places, for the module and for the struct placeholder but doesn't really clarify it (I should have named the latter just `pallet_struct` or something but it is a bit late) * The doc of `with_default` is a bit confusing too IMO. CC @Kianenigma --------- Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]>
-
Muharem Ismailov authored
Introduce `PalletId` as an additional seed parameter for pool's account id derivation. The PR also introduces the `pallet_asset_conversion_ops` pallet with a call to migrate a given pool to thew new account. Additionally `fungibles::lifetime::ResetTeam` and `fungible::lifetime::Refund` traits, to facilitate the migration of pools. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
Sergej Sakac authored
This PR introduces changes enabling the transfer of coretime regions via XCM. TL;DR: There are two primary issues that are resolved in this PR: 1. The `mint` and `burn` functions were not implemented for coretime regions. These operations are essential for moving assets to and from the XCM holding register. 2. The transfer of non-fungible assets through XCM was previously disallowed. This was due to incorrectly benchmarking non-fungible asset transfers via XCM, which led to assigning it a weight of `Weight::Max`, effectively preventing its execution. ### `mint_into` and `burn` implementation This PR addresses the issue with cross-chain transferring regions back to the Coretime chain. Remote reserve transfers are performed by withdrawing and depositing the asset to and from the holding registry. This requires the asset to support burning and minting functionality. This PR adds burning and minting; however, they work a bit differently than usual so that the associated region record is not lost when burning. Instead of removing all the data, burning will set the owner of the region to `None`, and when minting it back, it will set it to an actual value. So, when cross-chain transferring, withdrawing into the registry will remove the region from its original owner, and when depositing it from the registry, it will set its owner to another account This was originally implemented in this PR: #3455, however we decided to move all of it to this single PR (https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3455#discussion_r1547324892) ### Fixes made in this PR - Update the `XcmReserveTransferFilter` on coretime chain since it is meant as a reserve chain for coretime regions. - Update the XCM benchmark to use `AssetTransactor` instead of assuming `pallet-balances` for fungible transfers. - Update the XCM benchmark to properly measure weight consumption for nonfungible reserve asset transfers. ATM reserve transfers via the extrinsic do not work since the weight for it is set to `Weight::max()`. Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/865 --------- Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]>
-
Branislav Kontur authored
This PR adjusts `xcm-bridge-hub-router` to be usable in the chain of routers when a `NotApplicable` error occurs. Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4133 ## TODO - [ ] backport to polkadot-sdk 1.10.0 crates.io release
-
Alexandru Vasile authored
This PR sends the GrandpaNeighbor packet to lightclients similarly to the full-nodes. Previously, the lightclient would receive a GrandpaNeigbor packet only when the note set changed. Related to: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4120 Next steps: - [ ] check with lightclient --------- Signed-off-by: Alexandru Vasile <[email protected]>
-
- Apr 16, 2024
-
-
PG Herveou authored
Add verify statement to ensure that benchmarks call do not revert Also updated [benchmarks](https://weights.tasty.limo/compare?unit=time&ignore_errors=true&threshold=10&method=asymptotic&repo=polkadot-sdk&old=master&new=pg/verify-benchmarks&path_pattern=substrate%2Fframe%2Fcontracts%2Fsrc%2Fweights.rs) --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
Muharem Ismailov authored
Introduce types to define 1:1 balance conversion for different relative asset ids/locations of native asset. Examples: native asset on Asset Hub presented as `VersionedLocatableAsset` type in the context of Relay Chain is ``` { `location`: (0, Parachain(1000)), `asset_id`: (1, Here), } ``` and it's balance should be converted 1:1 by implementations of `ConversionToAssetBalance` trait. --------- Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>
-
Shawn Tabrizi authored
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
Updating the prdoc doc file to be a bit more useful for new contributors and adding a SemVer section. --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
-
Maksym H authored
Followup after https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3431 Per https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63188674/github-actions-detect-author-association and https://michaelheap.com/github-actions-check-permission/ looks like just checking NOT a MEMBER is not correct, Not a CONTRIBUTORs check should be included
-
Javyer authored
Follow up to #3431 Added an api check to verify that there are pre-existing approvals in the PR before dismissing reviews and posting a message
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
Changes: - Saturate in the input validation of he drop history function or pallet-broker. --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
-
Alin Dima authored
Will make https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/4035 easier to review (the mentioned PR already does this move so the diff will be clearer). Also called out as part of: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3233#discussion_r1490867383
-
Shawn Tabrizi authored
-
Shawn Tabrizi authored
-