This PR backports version bumps from `1.7.0` release branch and moves
related prdoc files to the appropriate folder.

The `TotalLockedValue` storage value in nomination pools pallet may get
out of sync if the staking pallet does implicit withdrawal of unlocking
chunks belonging to a bonded pool stash. This fix is based on a new
method in the `OnStakingUpdate` traits, `on_withdraw`, which allows the
nomination pools pallet to adjust the `TotalLockedValue` every time
there is an implicit or explicit withdrawal from a bonded pool's stash.

This PR also adds a migration that checks and updates the on-chain TVL
if it got out of sync due to the bug this PR fixes.

**Changes to `trait OnStakingUpdate`**

In order for staking to notify the nomination pools pallet that chunks
where withdrew, we add a new method, `on_withdraw` to the
`OnStakingUpdate` trait. The nomination pools pallet filters the
withdraws that are related to bonded pool accounts and updates the
`TotalValueLocked` accordingly.

**Others**
- Adds try-state checks to the EPM/staking e2e tests
- Adds tests for auto withdrawing in the context of nomination pools

**To-do**
- [x] check if we need a migration to fix the current `TotalValueLocked`
(run try-runtime)
- [x] migrations to fix the current on-chain TVL value 

 ✅ **Kusama**:
```
TotalValueLocked: 99.4559 kKSM
TotalValueLocked (calculated) 99.4559 kKSM
```
⚠

️ **Westend**:
```
TotalValueLocked: 18.4060 kWND
TotalValueLocked (calculated) 18.4050 kWND
```
**Polkadot**: TVL not released yet.

Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3055

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Ross Bulat <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]>

Preparation for https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2664

Changes:
- Only require `Hash` instead of `Block` for the benchmarking
- Refactor DB types to do the same

## Integration

This breaking change can easily be integrated into your node via:  
```patch
- cmd.run::<Block, ()>(config)
+ cmd.run::<HashingFor<Block>, ()>(config)
```

Status: waiting for CI checks

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: cheme <[email protected]>

This PR removes the configuration of subsystem benchmarks via CLI
arguments. After this, we only keep configurations only in yaml files.
It removes unnecessary code duplication

This adds `try_state()` and `integrity_test()` to the four runtimes of
the XCM-simulator fuzzer.

With this, we are able to stress-test [message-queue's
try_state](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7df1ae3b/substrate/frame/message-queue/src/lib.rs#L1245-L1347).

This also adds the `Transact` block-listing from #2424 to avoid
false-positives.

Thank you @ggwpez for the help with the runtime configurations.

1. Benchmark results are collected in a single struct.
2. The output of the results is prettified.
3. The result struct used to save the output as a yaml and store it in
artifacts in a CI job.

```
$ cargo run -p polkadot-subsystem-bench --release -- test-sequence --path polkadot/node/subsystem-bench/examples/availability_read.yaml | tee output.txt
$ cat output.txt

polkadot/node/subsystem-bench/examples/availability_read.yaml #1

Network usage, KiB                     total   per block
Received from peers               510796.000  170265.333
Sent to peers                        221.000      73.667

CPU usage, s                           total   per block
availability-recovery                 38.671      12.890
Test environment                       0.255       0.085


polkadot/node/subsystem-bench/examples/availability_read.yaml #2

Network usage, KiB                     total   per block
Received from peers               413633.000  137877.667
Sent to peers                        353.000     117.667

CPU usage, s                           total   per block
availability-recovery                 52.630      17.543
Test environment                       0.271       0.090


polkadot/node/subsystem-bench/examples/availability_read.yaml #3

Network usage, KiB                     total   per block
Received from peers               424379.000  141459.667
Sent to peers                        703.000     234.333

CPU usage, s                           total   per block
availability-recovery                 51.128      17.043
Test environment                       0.502       0.167

```

```
$ cargo run -p polkadot-subsystem-bench --release -- --ci test-sequence --path polkadot/node/subsystem-bench/examples/availability_read.yaml | tee output.txt
$ cat output.txt
- benchmark_name: 'polkadot/node/subsystem-bench/examples/availability_read.yaml #1'
  network:
  - resource: Received from peers
    total: 509011.0
    per_block: 169670.33333333334
  - resource: Sent to peers
    total: 220.0
    per_block: 73.33333333333333
  cpu:
  - resource: availability-recovery
    total: 31.845848445
    per_block: 10.615282815
  - resource: Test environment
    total: 0.23582828799999941
    per_block: 0.07860942933333313

- benchmark_name: 'polkadot/node/subsystem-bench/examples/availability_read.yaml #2'
  network:
  - resource: Received from peers
    total: 411738.0
    per_block: 137246.0
  - resource: Sent to peers
    total: 351.0
    per_block: 117.0
  cpu:
  - resource: availability-recovery
    total: 18.93596025099999
    per_block: 6.31198675033333
  - resource: Test environment
    total: 0.2541994199999979
    per_block: 0.0847331399999993

- benchmark_name: 'polkadot/node/subsystem-bench/examples/availability_read.yaml #3'
  network:
  - resource: Received from peers
    total: 424548.0
    per_block: 141516.0
  - resource: Sent to peers
    total: 703.0
    per_block: 234.33333333333334
  cpu:
  - resource: availability-recovery
    total: 16.54178526900001
    per_block: 5.513928423000003
  - resource: Test environment
    total: 0.43960946299999537
    per_block: 0.14653648766666513
```

---------

Co-authored-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>

Relates to: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3214

## TODO

- [ ] backport to the `1.7.0` release

Superseeds https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1245  

This PR is a migration of the
https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/14577.

The PR added associated types (`AddOrigin` & `RemoveOrigin`) to
`Config`. It allows you to decouple types and areas of responsibility,
since at the moment the same types are responsible for adding and
promoting(removing and demoting). This will improve the flexibility of
the pallet configuration.

```
/// The origin required to add a member.
type AddOrigin: EnsureOrigin<Self::RuntimeOrigin, Success = ()>;

/// The origin required to remove a member. The success value indicates the
/// maximum rank *from which* the removal may be.
type RemoveOrigin: EnsureOrigin<Self::RuntimeOrigin, Success = Rank>;
```
To achieve the backward compatibility, the users of the pallet can use
the old type via the new morph:

```
type AddOrigin = MapSuccess<Self::PromoteOrigin, Ignore>;
type RemoveOrigin = Self::DemoteOrigin;
```

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: PraetorP <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pavel Orlov <[email protected]>

Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3129

## Summary
Built on top of the tooling and ideas introduced in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2528, this PR introduces
a synthetic benchmark for measuring and assessing the performance
characteristics of the approval-voting and approval-distribution
subsystems.

Currently this allows, us to simulate the behaviours of these systems
based on the following dimensions:
```
TestConfiguration:
# Test 1
- objective: !ApprovalsTest
    last_considered_tranche: 89
    min_coalesce: 1
    max_coalesce: 6
    enable_assignments_v2: true
    send_till_tranche: 60
    stop_when_approved: false
    coalesce_tranche_diff: 12
    workdir_prefix: "/tmp"
    num_no_shows_per_candidate: 0
    approval_distribution_expected_tof: 6.0
    approval_distribution_cpu_ms: 3.0
    approval_voting_cpu_ms: 4.30
  n_validators: 500
  n_cores: 100
  n_included_candidates: 100
  min_pov_size: 1120
  max_pov_size: 5120
  peer_bandwidth: 524288000000
  bandwidth: 524288000000
  latency:
    min_latency:
      secs: 0
      nanos: 1000000
    max_latency:
      secs: 0
      nanos: 100000000
  error: 0
  num_blocks: 10
```

## The approach
1. We build a real overseer with the real implementations for
approval-voting and approval-distribution subsystems.
2. For a given network size, for each validator we pre-computed all
potential assignments and approvals it would send, because this a
computation heavy operation this will be cached on a file on disk and be
re-used if the generation parameters don't change.
3. The messages will be sent accordingly to the configured parameters
and those are split into 3 main benchmarking scenarios.

## Benchmarking scenarios

### Best case scenario *approvals_throughput_best_case.yaml*
It send to the approval-distribution only the minimum required tranche
to gathered the needed_approvals, so that a candidate is approved.

### Behaviour in the presence of no-shows *approvals_no_shows.yaml*
It sends the tranche needed to approve a candidate when we have a
maximum of *num_no_shows_per_candidate* tranches with no-shows for each
candidate.

### Maximum throughput *approvals_throughput.yaml*
It sends all the tranches for each block and measures the used CPU and
necessary network bandwidth. by the approval-voting and
approval-distribution subsystem.

## How to run it
```
cargo run -p polkadot-subsystem-bench --release -- test-sequence --path polkadot/node/subsystem-bench/examples/approvals_throughput.yaml
```

## Evaluating performance
### Use the real subsystems metrics
If you follow the steps in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/tree/master/polkadot/node/subsystem-bench#install-grafana
for installing locally prometheus and grafana, all real metrics for the
`approval-distribution`, `approval-voting` and overseer are available.
E.g:
<img width="2149" alt="Screenshot 2023-12-05 at 11 07 46"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/49718502/cb8ae2dd-178b-4922-bfa4-dc37e572ed38">

<img width="2551" alt="Screenshot 2023-12-05 at 11 09 42"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/49718502/8b4542ba-88b9-46f9-9b70-cc345366081b">

<img width="2154" alt="Screenshot 2023-12-05 at 11 10 15"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/49718502/b8874d8d-632e-443a-9840-14ad8e90c54f">

<img width="2535" alt="Screenshot 2023-12-05 at 11 10 52"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/49718502/779a439f-fd18-4985-bb80-85d5afad78e2">

### Profile with pyroscope
1. Setup pyroscope following the steps in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/tree/master/polkadot/node/subsystem-bench#install-pyroscope,
then run any of the benchmark scenario with `--profile` as the
arguments.
2. Open the pyroscope dashboard in grafana, e.g:
<img width="2544" alt="Screenshot 2024-01-09 at 17 09 58"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/49718502/58f50c99-a910-4d20-951a-8b16639303d9">



### Useful  logs
1. Network bandwidth requirements:
```
Payload bytes received from peers: 503993 KiB total, 50399 KiB/block
Payload bytes sent to peers: 629971 KiB total, 62997 KiB/block
```

2. Cpu usage by the approval-distribution/approval-voting subsystems.
```
approval-distribution CPU usage 84.061s
approval-distribution CPU usage per block 8.406s
approval-voting CPU usage 96.532s
approval-voting CPU usage per block 9.653s
```

3. Time passed until a given block is approved
```
 Chain selection approved  after 3500 ms hash=0x0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
Chain selection approved  after 4500 ms hash=0x0202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202
```

### Using benchmark to quantify improvements from
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1178 +
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1191

Using a versi-node we compare the scenarios where all new optimisations
are disabled with a scenarios where tranche0 assignments are sent in a
single message and a conservative simulation where the coalescing of
approvals gives us just 50% reduction in the number of messages we send.

Overall, what we see is a speedup of around 30-40% in the time it takes
to process the necessary messages and a 30-40% reduction in the
necessary bandwidth.

#### Best case scenario comparison(minimum required tranches sent).
Unoptimised
```
    Number of blocks: 10
    Payload bytes received from peers: 53289 KiB total, 5328 KiB/block
    Payload bytes sent to peers: 52489 KiB total, 5248 KiB/block
    approval-distribution CPU usage 6.732s
    approval-distribution CPU usage per block 0.673s
    approval-voting CPU usage 9.523s
    approval-voting CPU usage per block 0.952s
```

vs Optimisation enabled
```
   Number of blocks: 10
   Payload bytes received from peers: 32141 KiB total, 3214 KiB/block
   Payload bytes sent to peers: 37314 KiB total, 3731 KiB/block
   approval-distribution CPU usage 4.658s
   approval-distribution CPU usage per block 0.466s
   approval-voting CPU usage 6.236s
   approval-voting CPU usage per block 0.624s
```

#### Worst case all tranches sent, very unlikely happens when sharding
breaks.

Unoptimised
```
   Number of blocks: 10
   Payload bytes received from peers: 746393 KiB total, 74639 KiB/block
   Payload bytes sent to peers: 729151 KiB total, 72915 KiB/block
   approval-distribution CPU usage 118.681s
   approval-distribution CPU usage per block 11.868s
   approval-voting CPU usage 124.118s
   approval-voting CPU usage per block 12.412s
```

vs optimised
```
    Number of blocks: 10
    Payload bytes received from peers: 503993 KiB total, 50399 KiB/block
    Payload bytes sent to peers: 629971 KiB total, 62997 KiB/block
    approval-distribution CPU usage 84.061s
    approval-distribution CPU usage per block 8.406s
    approval-voting CPU usage 96.532s
    approval-voting CPU usage per block 9.653s
```


## TODOs
[x] Polish implementation.
[x] Use what we have so far to evaluate
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1191 before merging.
[x] List of features and additional dimensions we want to use for
benchmarking.
[x] Run benchmark on hardware similar with versi and kusama nodes.
[ ] Add benchmark to be run in CI for catching regression in
performance.
[ ] Rebase on latest changes for network emulation.

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>

This change is mainly for people running the local variants. They can
directly start with async backing.

---------

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>

The PR contains small fixes for:
* A test `HostConfig v11` storage migration - v11 was compared with
itself instead of with `v10`.
* Outdated comment for `ClaimQueue`
* Typos

Built on top of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2826/
which was a trial run.

Guide:
https://github.com/w3f/polkadot-wiki/blob/master/docs/maintain/maintain-guides-async-backing.md

---------

Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Dmitry Sinyavin <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: s0me0ne-unkn0wn <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Svyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]>

Fixes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3165

---------

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>

Fixup for https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2587 to make
the `core-fellowship` crate work with swapped members.

Adds a `MemberSwappedHandler` to the `ranked-collective` pallet that are
implemented by `core-fellowship+salary`.
There is are exhaustive tests
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/72aa7ac1/substrate/frame/core-fellowship/src/tests/integration.rs#L338)
and
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/ab3cdb05

/substrate/frame/salary/src/tests/integration.rs#L224)
to check that adding member `1` is equivalent to adding member `0` and
then swapping.

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>

This PR addresses two issues:
- It modifies `DepositAsset`'s asset filter from `All` to
`AllCounted(1)` to prevent potentially charging excessive weight/fees.
This adjustment avoids situations where fees could be calculated based
on the count of assets, as illustrated
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/cumulus/parachains/runtimes/bridge-hubs/bridge-hub-rococo/src/weights/xcm/mod.rs#L38-L46).
- It encapsulates `DepositAsset` with `SetAppendix` to ensure that
`fees` are not trapped in any case. For instance, this prevents issues
when `ExportXcm::validate` encounters an error during the processing of
`ExportMessage`.

Bumps [bounded-collections](https://github.com/paritytech/parity-common)
from 0.1.9 to 0.2.0.
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/paritytech/parity-common/commits/impl-rlp-v0.2.0">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />


[![Dependabot compatibility
score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency-name=bounded-collections&package-manager=cargo&previous-version=0.1.9&new-version=0.2.0)](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.

[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)

---

<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore <dependency name> major version` will close this
group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific
dependency's major version (unless you unignore this specific
dependency's major version or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore <dependency name> minor version` will close this
group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific
dependency's minor version (unless you unignore this specific
dependency's minor version or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore <dependency name>` will close this group update PR
and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency
(unless you unignore this specific dependency or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot unignore <dependency name>` will remove all of the ignore
conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot unignore <dependency name> <ignore condition>` will
remove the ignore condition of the specified dependency and ignore
conditions


</details>

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>

This fix aims to solve an issue in Kusama that resulted in failed
reserve asset transfers.

During multi-hop XCMs, like reserve asset transfers where the reserve is
not the sender nor the destination, but a third remote chain, the origin
is not available to pay for delivery fees out of their account directly,
so delivery fees should be paid out of transferred assets.

This commit also adds an xcm-emulator regression test that validates
this scenario is now working.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>

[frame] `#[pallet::composite_enum]` improved variant count handling + removed `pallet_balances`'s `MaxHolds` config (#2657)

I started this investigation/issue based on @liamaharon

 question
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1801#discussion_r1410452499).

## Problem

The `pallet_balances` integrity test should correctly detect that the
runtime has correct distinct `HoldReasons` variant count. I assume the
same situation exists for RuntimeFreezeReason.

It is not a critical problem, if we set `MaxHolds` with a sufficiently
large value, everything should be ok. However, in this case, the
integrity_test check becomes less useful.

**Situation for "any" runtime:**
- `HoldReason` enums from different pallets:
```rust
        /// from pallet_nis
        #[pallet::composite_enum]
	pub enum HoldReason {
		NftReceipt,
	}

        /// from pallet_preimage
        #[pallet::composite_enum]
	pub enum HoldReason {
		Preimage,
	}

        // from pallet_state-trie-migration
        #[pallet::composite_enum]
	pub enum HoldReason {
		SlashForContinueMigrate,
		SlashForMigrateCustomTop,
		SlashForMigrateCustomChild,
	}
```

- generated `RuntimeHoldReason` enum looks like:
```rust
pub enum RuntimeHoldReason {

    #[codec(index = 32u8)]
    Preimage(pallet_preimage::HoldReason),

    #[codec(index = 38u8)]
    Nis(pallet_nis::HoldReason),

    #[codec(index = 42u8)]
    StateTrieMigration(pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason),
}
```

- composite enum `RuntimeHoldReason` variant count is detected as `3`
- we set `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>`
- `pallet_balances::integrity_test` is ok with `3`(at least 3)

However, the real problem can occur in a live runtime where some
functionality might stop working. This is due to a total of 5 distinct
hold reasons (for pallets with multi-instance support, it is even more),
and not all of them can be used because of an incorrect `MaxHolds`,
which is deemed acceptable according to the `integrity_test`:
  ```
  // pseudo-code - if we try to call all of these:

T::Currency::hold(&pallet_nis::HoldReason::NftReceipt.into(),
&nft_owner, deposit)?;
T::Currency::hold(&pallet_preimage::HoldReason::Preimage.into(),
&nft_owner, deposit)?;

T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForContinueMigrate.into(),
&nft_owner, deposit)?;

  // With `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>` these two will fail

T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomTop.into(),
&nft_owner, deposit)?;

T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomChild.into(),
&nft_owner, deposit)?;
  ```  


## Solutions

A macro `#[pallet::*]` expansion is extended of `VariantCount`
implementation for the `#[pallet::composite_enum]` enum type. This
expansion generates the `VariantCount` implementation for pallets'
`HoldReason`, `FreezeReason`, `LockId`, and `SlashReason`. Enum variants
must be plain enum values without fields to ensure a deterministic
count.

The composite runtime enum, `RuntimeHoldReason` and
`RuntimeFreezeReason`, now sets `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT` as the sum
of pallets' enum `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT`:
```rust
#[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)]
mod module_single_instance {

	#[pallet::composite_enum]
	pub enum HoldReason {
		ModuleSingleInstanceReason1,
		ModuleSingleInstanceReason2,
	}
...
}

#[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)]
mod module_multi_instance {

	#[pallet::composite_enum]
	pub enum HoldReason<I: 'static = ()> {
		ModuleMultiInstanceReason1,
		ModuleMultiInstanceReason2,
		ModuleMultiInstanceReason3,
	}
...
}


impl self::sp_api_hidden_includes_construct_runtime::hidden_include::traits::VariantCount
    for RuntimeHoldReason
{
    const VARIANT_COUNT: u32 = 0
        + module_single_instance::HoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT
        + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance1>::VARIANT_COUNT
        + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance2>::VARIANT_COUNT
        + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance3>::VARIANT_COUNT;
}
```

In addition, `MaxHolds` is removed (as suggested
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2657#discussion_r1443324573))
from `pallet_balances`, and its `Holds` are now bounded to
`RuntimeHoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT`. Therefore, there is no need to let
the runtime specify `MaxHolds`.


## For reviewers

Relevant changes can be found here:
- `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/lib.rs` 
-  `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/parse/composite.rs`
-  `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/expand/composite.rs`
-
`substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/composite_helper.rs`
-
`substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/hold_reason.rs`
-
`substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/freeze_reason.rs`
- `substrate/frame/support/src/traits/misc.rs`

And the rest of the files is just about removed `MaxHolds` from
`pallet_balances`

## Next steps

Do the same for `MaxFreezes`
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2997.

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: gupnik <[email protected]>

Some more work regarding XCMv4. Two limits from v3 were not transferred
over, those are:
- The instructions limit
- The number of assets limit
Both of these are now in v4.

For some reason `AssetInstance` increased in size, don't know why CI
didn't catch that before.

---------

Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

cc https://github.com/paritytech/ci_cd/issues/926

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Vladimir Istyufeev <[email protected]>

Add `Balances::force_adjust_total_issuance` as preparation for fixing
https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/issues/147.
Important changes in `substrate/frame/balances/src/lib.rs`.

TODO:
- [x] Update weights

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>

fixes #675

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>

closes https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/help-center/issues/1

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>

Moves `pallet_mmr` back behind `pallet_session` to address
polkadot-fellows/runtimes#160.

Opening draft for CI - should be merged or closed depending on outcome
of w3f/polkadot-spec#718.

---------

Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>

Reverts paritytech/polkadot-sdk#2302. 🤦‍♂️ should have checked the
migration CI first.

We either need to reduce the `max_message_size` for the open HRMP
channels on the failing chains or increase the `PageSize` of the XCMP
queue.
Both would be fine on a test-net, but i assume this will also fail
before the next SP runtime upgrade so first need to think what best to
do.
AFAIK its not possible currently to change the `max_message_size` of an
open HRMP channel.

Candidate validation has a lot of operations that are cpu bound on its
main loop things, like:
```
validation_code.hash()
sp_maybe_compressed_blob::decompress(
		&validation_code.0,
		VALIDATION_CODE_BOMB_LIMIT,
)

sp_maybe_compressed_blob::decompress(&pov.block_data.0, POV_BOMB_LIMIT) 
let code_hash = sp_crypto_hashing::blake2_256(&code).into();
```

When you add all that you for large POV and CODE it is going to take in
the order of 10s of ms and because these are cpu bound operation it is
going to hog the executor thread and negatively affect other subsystems
around it, so it is better to just move the subsystem on the blocking
pool to make sure such unexpected behaviour is avoided.

Note! In practice this subsystem does not have a high number of work to
be done, so probably the impact of it is really low, but better safe
than sorry.

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>

Remove `without_storage_info` from the XCMP queue pallet. Part of
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/323

Changes:
- Limit the number of channels that can be suspended at the same time.
- Limit the number of channels that can have messages or signals pending
at the same time.

A No-OP migration is put in place to ensure that all `BoundedVec`s still
decode and not truncate after upgrade. The storage version is thereby
bumped to 4 to have our tooling remind us to deploy that migration.

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>

Pulls: https://github.com/paritytech/orchestra/pull/71

---------

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>

After some conversations around the topic of launching a community
staging network ( [forum post
1](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/a-new-test-network-for-polkadot/4325),
[forum post
2](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/the-new-polkadot-community-testnet/4956)
). And Erin having introduced the community testnet in the [last episode
of AAG](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzJEGVG78_E&t=1612s).

I would like to include the `paseo` options as one of the chains
available for launching using the polkadot node.

Note that the chain spec implementation is not yet included at this
stage.

UPDATE:

Merged master with rebase enabled and introduced quite some noise in
this PR.
Relevant changes are in:
- `polkadot/node/service/chain-specs/paseo.json`
- `polkadot/node/service/src/chain_spec.rs`
- `polkadot/cli/src/command.rs`

---------

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jegor Sidorenko <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Theißen <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sergej Sakac <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Adel Arja <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ross Bulat <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Gamundi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>

Currently, collators and their alongside nodes spin up a full-scale
overseer running a bunch of subsystems that are not needed if the node
is not a validator. That was considered to be harmless; however, we've
got problems with unused subsystems getting stalled for a reason not
currently known, resulting in the overseer exiting and bringing down the
whole node.

This PR aims to only run needed subsystems on such nodes, replacing the
rest with `DummySubsystem`.

It also enables collator-optimized availability recovery subsystem
implementation.

Partially solves #1730.

Topology is coming only at the beginning of each session, so we might
lose it if prospective parachains was not enabled at the begining of the
session, so cache it for later use.

Fixes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3058

---------

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>

Continues the work of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7312.
`MultiLocation` was modified to implement serialize in no-std in that
PR, but not the assets types.
This PR does the same for assets, and this also allows to inject them in
pallets that require them in genesis.

Related https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3032

---

Using https://github.com/liamaharon/cargo-workspace-version-tools/ 

`cargo run -- sync --path ../polkadot-sdk`

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>

🤦🏼



---------

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>

also remove some dead code and deduplicate some error handling

the new release brings performance improvements and support for
systematic chunk recovery, needed in:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1644

This PR introduces a new `NonFungibleAdapter`.

It will be useful for enabling cross-chain Coretime region transfers, as
the existing `NonFungiblesAdapter` is unsuitable for this purpose. This
is due to the fact that there is only one class of items within the
`pallet-broker`, i.e., the Coretime regions.

---------

Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]>

Add subsystem benchmarks for `availability-distribution` and `biftield-distribution` (availability write) (#2970)

Introduce a new test objective : `DataAvailabilityWrite`.

The new benchmark measures the network and cpu usage of
`availability-distribution`, `biftield-distribution` and
`availability-store` subsystems from the perspective of a validator node
during the process when candidates are made available.

Additionally I refactored the networking emulation to support bandwidth
acounting and limits of incoming and outgoing requests.

Screenshot of succesful run


<img width="1293" alt="Screenshot 2024-01-17 at 19 17 44"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/54316454/fde11280-e25b-4dc3-9dc9-d4b9752f9b7a">

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>

Fixes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2138.

Especially on restart AuthorithyDiscovery cache is not populated so we
create an invalid topology and messages won't be routed correctly for
the entire session. This PR proposes to try to fix this by updating the
topology as soon as we now the Authority/PeerId mapping, that should
impact the situation dramatically.


[This issue was hit
yesterday](https://grafana.teleport.parity.io/goto/o9q2625Sg?orgId=1),
on Westend and resulted in stalling the finality.


# TODO

- [x] Unit tests
- [x] Test impact on versi

---------

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>