Skip to content
  1. Feb 26, 2024
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      [pallet-xcm] Adjust benchmarks (teleport_assets/reserve_transfer_assets) not relying on ED (#3464) · 3d9439f6
      Branislav Kontur authored
      
      
      ## Problem
      During the bumping of the `polkadot-fellows` repository to
      `[email protected]`, I encountered a situation where the benchmarks
      `teleport_assets` and `reserve_transfer_assets` in AssetHubKusama
      started to fail. This issue arose due to a decreased ED balance for
      AssetHubs introduced
      [here](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/158/files#diff-80668ff8e793b64f36a9a3ec512df5cbca4ad448c157a5d81abda1b15f35f1daR213),
      and also because of a [missing CI
      pipeline](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/issues/197) to
      check the benchmarks, which went unnoticed.
      
      These benchmarks expect the `caller` to have enough:
      1. balance to transfer (BTT)
      2. balance for paying delivery (BFPD).
       
      So the initial balance was calculated as `ED * 100`, which seems
      reasonable:
      ```
      const ED_MULTIPLIER: u32 = 100;
      let balance = existential_deposit.saturating_mul(ED_MULTIPLIER.into());`
      ```
      The problem arises when the price for delivery is 100 times higher than
      the existential deposit. In other words, when `ED * 100` does not cover
      `BTT` + `BFPD`.
      
      I check AHR/AHW/AHK/AHP and this problem has only AssetHubKusama
      ```
      ED: 3333333
      calculated price to parent delivery:  1031666634  (from xcm logs from the benchmark)
      ---
      
      3333333 * 100 - BTT(3333333) - BFPD(1031666634) = −701666667
      ```
      which results in the error;
      ```
      2024-02-23 09:19:42 Unable to charge fee with error Module(ModuleError { index: 31, error: [17, 0, 0, 0], message: Some("FeesNotMet") })
      Error: Input("Benchmark pallet_xcm::reserve_transfer_assets failed: FeesNotMet")
           
      ```
      
      ## Solution
      
      The benchmarks `teleport_assets` and `reserve_transfer_assets` were
      fixed by removing `ED * 100` and replacing it with `DeliveryHelper`
      logic, which calculates the (almost real) price for delivery and sets it
      along with the existential deposit as the initial balance for the
      account used in the benchmark.
      
      
      ## TODO
      
      - [ ] patch for 1.6 -
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3466
      - [ ] patch for 1.7 -
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3465
      - [ ] patch for 1.8 - TODO: PR
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
      3d9439f6
  2. Feb 21, 2024
    • Clara van Staden's avatar
      Snowbridge - Test pallet order (#3381) · 5a06771e
      Clara van Staden authored
      - Adds a test to check the correct digest for Snowbridge outbound
      messages. For the correct digest to be in the block, the the
      MessageQueue pallet should be configured after the EthereumOutbound
      queue pallet. The added test fails if the EthereumOutbound is configured
      after the MessageQueue pallet.
      - Adds a helper method `run_to_block_with_finalize` to simulate the
      block finalizing. The existing `run_to_block` method does not finalize
      and so it cannot successfully test this condition.
      
      Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3208
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: claravanstaden <Cats 4 life!>
      5a06771e
  3. Feb 16, 2024
  4. Feb 13, 2024
  5. Feb 09, 2024
  6. Feb 06, 2024
  7. Feb 02, 2024
  8. Jan 31, 2024
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      [frame] `#[pallet::composite_enum]` improved variant count handling + removed... · bb8ddc46
      Branislav Kontur authored
      [frame] `#[pallet::composite_enum]` improved variant count handling + removed `pallet_balances`'s `MaxHolds` config (#2657)
      
      I started this investigation/issue based on @liamaharon
      
       question
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1801#discussion_r1410452499).
      
      ## Problem
      
      The `pallet_balances` integrity test should correctly detect that the
      runtime has correct distinct `HoldReasons` variant count. I assume the
      same situation exists for RuntimeFreezeReason.
      
      It is not a critical problem, if we set `MaxHolds` with a sufficiently
      large value, everything should be ok. However, in this case, the
      integrity_test check becomes less useful.
      
      **Situation for "any" runtime:**
      - `HoldReason` enums from different pallets:
      ```rust
              /// from pallet_nis
              #[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason {
      		NftReceipt,
      	}
      
              /// from pallet_preimage
              #[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason {
      		Preimage,
      	}
      
              // from pallet_state-trie-migration
              #[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason {
      		SlashForContinueMigrate,
      		SlashForMigrateCustomTop,
      		SlashForMigrateCustomChild,
      	}
      ```
      
      - generated `RuntimeHoldReason` enum looks like:
      ```rust
      pub enum RuntimeHoldReason {
      
          #[codec(index = 32u8)]
          Preimage(pallet_preimage::HoldReason),
      
          #[codec(index = 38u8)]
          Nis(pallet_nis::HoldReason),
      
          #[codec(index = 42u8)]
          StateTrieMigration(pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason),
      }
      ```
      
      - composite enum `RuntimeHoldReason` variant count is detected as `3`
      - we set `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>`
      - `pallet_balances::integrity_test` is ok with `3`(at least 3)
      
      However, the real problem can occur in a live runtime where some
      functionality might stop working. This is due to a total of 5 distinct
      hold reasons (for pallets with multi-instance support, it is even more),
      and not all of them can be used because of an incorrect `MaxHolds`,
      which is deemed acceptable according to the `integrity_test`:
        ```
        // pseudo-code - if we try to call all of these:
      
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_nis::HoldReason::NftReceipt.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_preimage::HoldReason::Preimage.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
      
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForContinueMigrate.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
      
        // With `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>` these two will fail
      
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomTop.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
      
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomChild.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
        ```  
      
      
      ## Solutions
      
      A macro `#[pallet::*]` expansion is extended of `VariantCount`
      implementation for the `#[pallet::composite_enum]` enum type. This
      expansion generates the `VariantCount` implementation for pallets'
      `HoldReason`, `FreezeReason`, `LockId`, and `SlashReason`. Enum variants
      must be plain enum values without fields to ensure a deterministic
      count.
      
      The composite runtime enum, `RuntimeHoldReason` and
      `RuntimeFreezeReason`, now sets `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT` as the sum
      of pallets' enum `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT`:
      ```rust
      #[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)]
      mod module_single_instance {
      
      	#[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason {
      		ModuleSingleInstanceReason1,
      		ModuleSingleInstanceReason2,
      	}
      ...
      }
      
      #[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)]
      mod module_multi_instance {
      
      	#[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason<I: 'static = ()> {
      		ModuleMultiInstanceReason1,
      		ModuleMultiInstanceReason2,
      		ModuleMultiInstanceReason3,
      	}
      ...
      }
      
      
      impl self::sp_api_hidden_includes_construct_runtime::hidden_include::traits::VariantCount
          for RuntimeHoldReason
      {
          const VARIANT_COUNT: u32 = 0
              + module_single_instance::HoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT
              + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance1>::VARIANT_COUNT
              + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance2>::VARIANT_COUNT
              + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance3>::VARIANT_COUNT;
      }
      ```
      
      In addition, `MaxHolds` is removed (as suggested
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2657#discussion_r1443324573))
      from `pallet_balances`, and its `Holds` are now bounded to
      `RuntimeHoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT`. Therefore, there is no need to let
      the runtime specify `MaxHolds`.
      
      
      ## For reviewers
      
      Relevant changes can be found here:
      - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/lib.rs` 
      -  `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/parse/composite.rs`
      -  `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/expand/composite.rs`
      -
      `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/composite_helper.rs`
      -
      `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/hold_reason.rs`
      -
      `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/freeze_reason.rs`
      - `substrate/frame/support/src/traits/misc.rs`
      
      And the rest of the files is just about removed `MaxHolds` from
      `pallet_balances`
      
      ## Next steps
      
      Do the same for `MaxFreezes`
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2997.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDónal Murray <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatargupnik <[email protected]>
      bb8ddc46
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      [cumulus] `parachains-common` testnet constants cleaning (#3134) · 4450b615
      Branislav Kontur authored
      
      
      The `parachains-common` contains a lots of constants and type
      definitions which are used for `polkadot-sdk`'s testnet runtimes and
      also for `polkadot-fellows`'s production [SP
      runtimes](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/tree/main/system-parachains/constants).
      This PR cleans `parachains-common` module to contain only common and
      generic functionality.
      
      Testnet-specific constants have been moved to the separate module
      dedicated just for testnets:
      `polkadot-sdk/cumulus/parachains/runtimes/constants/`
      
      
      Part of: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3054
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
      4450b615
  9. Jan 30, 2024
  10. Jan 29, 2024
    • Oliver Tale-Yazdi's avatar
      [Runtime] Bound XCMP queue (#2302) · b8f55d1b
      Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
      
      
      Remove `without_storage_info` from the XCMP queue pallet. Part of
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/323
      
      Changes:
      - Limit the number of channels that can be suspended at the same time.
      - Limit the number of channels that can have messages or signals pending
      at the same time.
      
      A No-OP migration is put in place to ensure that all `BoundedVec`s still
      decode and not truncate after upgrade. The storage version is thereby
      bumped to 4 to have our tooling remind us to deploy that migration.
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
      b8f55d1b
  11. Jan 24, 2024
    • Just van Stam's avatar
      Transactional processing for XCM (#1222) · 50eb12cf
      Just van Stam authored
      
      
      Moved from: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6951
      
      closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/490
      
      - [x] update cumulus
      
      --- 
      This PR introduces transactional processing of certain xcm instructions.
      For the list of instructions checkout
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/490. The transactional
      processing is implemented as an xcm-executor config item. The two
      implementations in this PR are `FrameTransactionalProcessor` and `()`.
      The `()` implementation does no transactional processing. Each
      implementation of the `ProcessTransaction` trait has an
      `IS_TRANSACTIONAL` const that tells the XCVM if transactional processing
      is actually implemented. If Transactional processing is implemented,
      changes to touched registers should also be rolled back to prevent
      inconsistencies.
      
      
      Note for reviewers:
      Check out the following safety assumption:
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1222/files#diff-4effad7d8c1c9de19fd27e18661cbf2128c8718f3b2420a27d2f816e0749ea53R30
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarKeith Yeung <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      50eb12cf
  12. Jan 22, 2024
  13. Jan 19, 2024
  14. Jan 17, 2024
  15. Jan 16, 2024
    • Francisco Aguirre's avatar
      XCMv4 (#1230) · 8428f678
      Francisco Aguirre authored
      
      
      # Note for reviewer
      
      Most changes are just syntax changes necessary for the new version.
      Most important files should be the ones under the `xcm` folder.
      
      # Description 
      
      Added XCMv4.
      
      ## Removed `Multi` prefix
      The following types have been renamed:
      - MultiLocation -> Location
      - MultiAsset -> Asset
      - MultiAssets -> Assets
      - InteriorMultiLocation -> InteriorLocation
      - MultiAssetFilter -> AssetFilter
      - VersionedMultiAsset -> VersionedAsset
      - WildMultiAsset -> WildAsset
      - VersionedMultiLocation -> VersionedLocation
      
      In order to fix a name conflict, the `Assets` in `xcm-executor` were
      renamed to `HoldingAssets`, as they represent assets in holding.
      
      ## Removed `Abstract` asset id
      
      It was not being used anywhere and this simplifies the code.
      
      Now assets are just constructed as follows:
      
      ```rust
      let asset: Asset = (AssetId(Location::new(1, Here)), 100u128).into();
      ```
      
      No need for specifying `Concrete` anymore.
      
      ## Outcome is now a named fields struct
      
      Instead of
      
      ```rust
      pub enum Outcome {
        Complete(Weight),
        Incomplete(Weight, Error),
        Error(Error),
      }
      ```
      
      we now have
      
      ```rust
      pub enum Outcome {
        Complete { used: Weight },
        Incomplete { used: Weight, error: Error },
        Error { error: Error },
      }
      ```
      
      ## Added Reanchorable trait
      
      Now both locations and assets implement this trait, making it easier to
      reanchor both.
      
      ## New syntax for building locations and junctions
      
      Now junctions are built using the following methods:
      
      ```rust
      let location = Location {
          parents: 1,
          interior: [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)].into()
      };
      ```
      
      or
      
      ```rust
      let location = Location::new(1, [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)]);
      ```
      
      And they are matched like so:
      
      ```rust
      match location.unpack() {
        (1, [Parachain(id)]) => ...
        (0, Here) => ...,
        (1, [_]) => ...,
      }
      ```
      
      This syntax is mandatory in v4, and has been also implemented for v2 and
      v3 for easier migration.
      
      This was needed to make all sizes smaller.
      
      # TODO
      - [x] Scaffold v4
      - [x] Port github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7236
      - [x] Remove `Multi` prefix
      - [x] Remove `Abstract` asset id
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarKeith Yeung <[email protected]>
      8428f678
  16. Jan 10, 2024
  17. Jan 09, 2024
  18. Dec 22, 2023
  19. Dec 21, 2023
  20. Dec 20, 2023
    • joe petrowski's avatar
      Add Authorize Upgrade Pattern to Frame System (#2682) · 280aa0b5
      joe petrowski authored
      Adds the `authorize_upgrade` -> `enact_authorized_upgrade` pattern to
      `frame-system`. This will be useful for upgrading bridged chains that
      are under the governance of Polkadot without passing entire runtime Wasm
      blobs over a bridge.
      
      Notes:
      
      - Changed `enact_authorized_upgrade` to `apply_authorized_upgrade`.
      Personal opinion, "apply" more accurately expresses what it's doing. Can
      change back if outvoted.
      - Remove `check_version` in favor of two extrinsics, so as to make
      _checked_ the default.
      - Left calls in `parachain-system` and marked as deprecated to prevent
      breaking the API. They just call into the `frame-system` functions.
      - Updated `frame-system` benchmarks to v2 syntax.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      280aa0b5
  21. Dec 18, 2023
  22. Dec 15, 2023
  23. Dec 14, 2023
    • Svyatoslav Nikolsky's avatar
      Add Rococo People <> Rococo Bulletin bridge support to Rococo Bridge Hub (#2540) · 097308e3
      Svyatoslav Nikolsky authored
      This PR adds [Rococo
      People](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2281) <> [Rococo
      Bulletin](https://github.com/zdave-parity/polkadot-bulletin-chain) to
      the Rococo Bridge Hub code. There's a couple of things left to do here:
      - [x] add remaining tests - it'd need some refactoring in the
      `bridge-hub-test-utils` - will do in a separate PR;
      - [x] actually run benchmarks for new messaging pallet (do we have bot
      nowadays?).
      
      The reason why I'm opening it before this ^^^ is ready, is that I'd like
      to hear others opinion on how to deal with hacks with that bridge.
      Initially I was assuming that Rococo Bulletin will be the 1:1 copy of
      the Polkadot Bulletin (to avoid maintaining multiple
      runtimes/releases/...), so you can see many `PolkadotBulletin` mentions
      in this PR, even though we are going to bridge with the parallel chain
      (`RococoBulletin`). That's because e.g. pallet names from
      `construct_runtime` are affecting runtime storage keys and bridges are
      using runtime storage proofs => it is important to use names that the
      Bulletin chain expects.
      
      But in the end, this hack won't work - we can't use Polkadot Bulletin
      runtime to bridge with Rococo Bridge Hub, because Polkadot Bulletin
      expects Polkadot Bridge hub to use `1002` parachain id and Rococo Bridge
      Hub seats on the `1013`. This also affects storage keys using in
      bridging, so I had to add the [`rococo`
      feature](https://github.com/svyatonik/polkadot-bulletin-chain/blob/add-bridge-pallets/runtime/Cargo.toml#L198)
      to the Bulletin chain. So now we can actually alter its runtime and
      adapt it for Rococo.
      
      So the question here is - what's better for us here
      - to leave everything as is (seems hacky and non-trivial);
      - change Bulletin chain runtime when `rococo` feature is used - e.g. use
      proper names there (`WithPolkadotGrandpa` -> `WithRococoGrandpa`, ...)
      - add another set of pallets to the Bulletin chain runtime to bridge
      with Rococo and never use them in production. Similar to hack that we
      had in Rococo/Wococo
      
      cc @acatangiu @bkontur @serban300 
      
      also cc @joepetrowski
      
       as the main "client" of this bridge
      
      ---
      
      A couple words on how this bridge is different from the Rococo <>
      Westend bridge:
      - it is a bridge with a chain that uses GRANDPA finality, not the
      parachain finality (hence the tests needs to be changed);
      - it is a fee-free bridge. So
      `AllowExplicitUnpaidExecutionFrom<Equals<SiblingPeople>>` + we are not
      paying any rewards to relayers (apart from compensating transaction
      costs).
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatardependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAdrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatardependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarEgor_P <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      097308e3
    • Francisco Aguirre's avatar
      Add FungibleAdapter (#2684) · 10a91f82
      Francisco Aguirre authored
      In the move from the old `Currency` traits to the new `fungible/s`
      family of traits, we already had the `FungiblesAdapter` and
      `NonFungiblesAdapter` for multiple fungible and non fungible assets
      respectively. However, for handling only one fungible asset, we were
      missing a `FungibleAdapter`, and so used the old `CurrencyAdapter`
      instead. This PR aims to fill in that gap, and provide the new adapter
      for more updated examples.
      
      I marked the old `CurrencyAdapter` as deprecated as part of this PR, and
      I'll change it to the new `FungibleAdapter` in a following PR.
      The two stages are separated so as to not bloat this PR with some name
      fixes in tests.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      10a91f82
    • Egor_P's avatar
      [Backport] txn version bump from 1.5.0 (#2709) · 3e4e8c0b
      Egor_P authored
      This PR backports `transaction_version` bump from `1.5.0` release back
      to `master`
      3e4e8c0b
  24. Dec 13, 2023
  25. Dec 12, 2023
    • Francisco Aguirre's avatar
      Fix ParentOrSiblings (#2428) · 313b2c4b
      Francisco Aguirre authored
      
      
      We were not filtering for sibling parachains, but for sibling anything
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      313b2c4b
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      Ensure xcm versions over bridge (on sending chains) (#2481) · 575b8f8d
      Branislav Kontur authored
      ## Summary
      
      This pull request proposes a solution for improved control of the
      versioned XCM flow over the bridge (across different consensus chains)
      and resolves the situation where the sending chain/consensus has already
      migrated to a higher XCM version than the receiving chain/consensus.
      
      ## Problem/Motivation
      
      The current flow over the bridge involves a transfer from AssetHubRococo
      (AHR) to BridgeHubRococo (BHR) to BridgeHubWestend (BHW) and finally to
      AssetHubWestend (AHW), beginning with a reserve-backed transfer on AHR.
      
      In this process:
      1. AHR sends XCM `ExportMessage` through `XcmpQueue`, incorporating XCM
      version checks using the `WrapVersion` feature, influenced by
      `pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion` (managed by
      `pallet_xcm::force_xcm_version` or version discovery).
      
      2. BHR handles the `ExportMessage` instruction, utilizing the latest XCM
      version. The `HaulBlobExporter` converts the inner XCM to
      [`VersionedXcm::from`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/63ac2471/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/universal_exports.rs#L465-L467),
      also using the latest XCM version.
      
      However, challenges arise:
      - Incompatibility when BHW uses a different version than BHR. For
      instance, if BHR migrates to **XCMv4** while BHW remains on **XCMv3**,
      BHR's `VersionedXcm::from` uses `VersionedXcm::V4` variant, causing
      encoding issues for BHW.
        ```
      	/// Just a simulation of possible error, which could happen on BHW
      	/// (this code is based on actual master without XCMv4)
      	let encoded = hex_literal::hex!("0400");
      	println!("{:?}", VersionedXcm::<()>::decode(&mut &encoded[..]));
      
      Err(Error { cause: None, desc: "Could not decode `VersionedXcm`, variant
      doesn't exist" })
        ``` 
      - Similar compatibility issues exist between AHR and AHW.
      
      ## Solution
      
      This pull request introduces the following solutions:
      
      1. **New trait `CheckVersion`** - added to the `xcm` module and exposing
      `pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion`. This enhancement allows checking the
      actual XCM version for desired destinations outside of the `pallet_xcm`
      module.
      
      2. **Version Check in `HaulBlobExporter`** uses `CheckVersion` to check
      known/configured destination versions, ensuring compatibility. For
      example, in the scenario mentioned, BHR can store the version `3` for
      BHW. If BHR is on XCMv4, it will attempt to downgrade the message to
      version `3` instead of using the latest version `4`.
      
      3. **Version Check in `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router`** - this check
      ensures compatibility with the real destination's XCM version,
      preventing the unnecessary sending of messages to the local bridge hub
      if versions are incompatible.
      
      These additions aim to improve the control and compatibility of XCM
      flows over the bridge and addressing issues related to version
      mismatches.
      
      ## Possible alternative solution
      
      _(More investigation is needed, and at the very least, it should extend
      to XCMv4/5. If this proves to be a viable option, I can open an RFC for
      XCM.)._
      
      Add the `XcmVersion` attribute to the `ExportMessage` so that the
      sending chain can determine, based on what is stored in
      `pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion`, the version the destination is using.
      This way, we may not need to handle the version in `HaulBlobExporter`.
      
      ```
      ExportMessage {
      	network: NetworkId,
      	destination: InteriorMultiLocation,
      	xcm: Xcm<()>
      	destination_xcm_version: Version, // <- new attritbute
      },
      ```
      
      ```
      pub trait ExportXcm {
              fn validate(
      		network: NetworkId,
      		channel: u32,
      		universal_source: &mut Option<InteriorMultiLocation>,
      		destination: &mut Option<InteriorMultiLocation>,
      		message: &mut Option<Xcm<()>>,
                      destination_xcm_version: Version, , // <- new attritbute
      	) -> SendResult<Self::Ticket>;
      ```
      
      ## Future Directions
      
      This PR does not fix version discovery over bridge, further
      investigation will be conducted here:
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2417.
      
      ## TODO
      
      - [x] `pallet_xcm` mock for tests uses hard-coded XCM version `2` -
      change to 3 or lastest?
      - [x] fix `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router`
      - [x] fix HaulBlobExporter with version determination
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/2183669d/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/universal_exports.rs#L465)
      - [x] add unit-tests to the runtimes
      - [x] run benchmarks for `ExportMessage`
      - [x] extend local run scripts about `force_xcm_version(dest, version)`
      - [ ] when merged, prepare governance calls for Rococo/Westend
      - [ ] add PRDoc
      
      Part of: https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2719
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      575b8f8d
    • Chevdor's avatar
      Changelogs local generation (#1411) · 42a3afba
      Chevdor authored
      
      
      This PR introduces a script and some templates to use the prdoc involved
      in a release and build:
      - the changelog
      - a simple draft of audience documentation
      
      Since the prdoc presence was enforced in the middle of the version
      1.5.0, not all PRs did come with a `prdoc` file.
      This PR creates all the missing `prdoc` files with some minimum content
      allowing to properly generate the changelog.
      The generated content is **not** suitable for the audience
      documentation.
      
      The audience documentation will be possible with the next version, when
      all PR come with a proper `prdoc`.
      
      ## Assumptions
      
      - the prdoc files for release `vX.Y.Z` have been moved under
      `prdoc/X.Y.Z`
      - the changelog requires for now for the prdoc files to contain author +
      topic. Thos fields are optional.
      
      The build script can  be called as:
      ```
      VERSION=X.Y.Z ./scripts/release/build-changelogs.sh
      ```
      
      Related:
      -  #1408
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarEgorPopelyaev <[email protected]>
      42a3afba
  26. Dec 06, 2023
    • Svyatoslav Nikolsky's avatar
      Added AllSiblingSystemParachains matcher to be used at a parachain level (#2422) · 0b3d0677
      Svyatoslav Nikolsky authored
      
      
      As suggested in this thread:
      https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/87#discussion_r1400237122
      
      We already have the `IsChildSystemParachain`, which may be used at relay
      chain, but it can't be used at a parachain level. So let's use
      `AllSiblingSystemParachains` for that. I was thinking about
      `AllSystemParachains`, but it may cause wrong impression that it can be
      used at a relay chain level.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarjoe petrowski <[email protected]>
      0b3d0677
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      Bridges subtree update (#2602) · be500fc2
      Branislav Kontur authored
      ## Summary
      
      This PR aligns Rococo/Westend bridge with latest Bridges repo
      development:
      - https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/pull/2727
      - https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/pull/2728
      - https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/pull/2729
      
      
      
      
      Part of: https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2452
      be500fc2
    • Adrian Catangiu's avatar
      pallet-xcm: add new flexible `transfer_assets()` call/extrinsic (#2388) · e7651cf4
      Adrian Catangiu authored
      # Motivation (+testing)
      
      ### Enable easy `ForeignAssets` transfers using `pallet-xcm` 
      
      We had just previously added capabilities to teleport fees during
      reserve-based transfers, but what about reserve-transferring fees when
      needing to teleport some non-fee asset?
      
      This PR aligns everything under either explicit reserve-transfer,
      explicit teleport, or this new flexible `transfer_assets()` which can
      mix and match as needed with fewer artificial constraints imposed to the
      user.
      
      This will enable, for example, a (non-system) parachain to teleport
      their `ForeignAssets` assets to AssetHub while using DOT to pay fees.
      (the assets are teleported - as foreign assets should from their owner
      chain - while DOT used for fees can only be reserve-based transferred
      between said parachain and AssetHub).
      
      Added `xcm-emulator` tests for this scenario ^.
      
      # Description
      
      Reverts `(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets` to only allow reserve-based
      transfers for all `assets` including fees.
      
      Similarly `(limited_)teleport_assets` only allows teleports for all
      `assets` including fees.
          
      For complex combinations of asset transfers where assets and fees may
      have different reserves or different reserve/teleport trust
      configurations, users can use the newly added `transfer_assets()`
      extrinsic which is more flexible in allowing more complex scenarios.
      
      `assets` (excluding `fees`) must have same reserve location or otherwise
      be teleportable to `dest`.
      No limitations imposed on `fees`.
      
      - for local reserve: transfer assets to sovereign account of destination
      chain and forward a notification XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit
      reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`.
      - for destination reserve: burn local assets and forward a notification
      to `dest` chain to withdraw the reserve assets from this chain's
      sovereign account and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
      - for remote reserve: burn local assets, forward XCM to reserve chain to
      move reserves from this chain's SA to `dest` chain's SA, and forward
      another XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to
      `beneficiary`.
      - for teleports: burn local assets and forward XCM to `dest` chain to
      mint/teleport assets and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
      
      ## Review notes
      
      Only around 500 lines are prod code (see `pallet_xcm/src/lib.rs`), the
      rest of the PR is new tests and improving existing tests.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      e7651cf4
  27. Dec 05, 2023
  28. Dec 04, 2023
    • Serban Iorga's avatar
      Cleanup XCMP `QueueConfigData` (#2142) · 1266de39
      Serban Iorga authored
      Removes obsolete fields from the `QueueConfigData` structure. For the
      remaining fields, if they use the old defaults, we replace them with the
      new defaults.
      
      Resolves: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1795
      1266de39
  29. Nov 27, 2023
    • Chevdor's avatar
      New runtime `spec_version` format + backport of the bump to 1.4.0 (#2468) · 4f8048b9
      Chevdor authored
      
      
      ## Overview
      
      This PR aligns the `spec_version` formatting to the [recent
      changes](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/26/files#diff-efa4caeb17487ecb13d8f5eb7863c3241d84afa2e73fbf25909a2ca89df0f362R142)
      made for the Polkadot/Kusama runtimes.
      
      It also backports the latest version `v1.4.0` bumps as `1_004_000`.
      
      ## Details
      
      During the switch from `v0.9` to `v1.x`, the format of the
      `spec_version` was modified from: `(M)m_ppp` for a runtime considered on
      version `M.m.pp`. For instance `0.9.42` had a `spec_version` of `9420`.
      
      With the transition to `v1.x`, the format was changed to a bigger number
      (still `u32`) formatted as `MM_mm_ppp` where `1.2.3` would be stored as
      `01_02_003`.
      
      This PR aligns the format with that has been introduced in the
      fellowship repo: `MMM_mmm_ppp`.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      4f8048b9