- Nov 28, 2023
-
-
Svyatoslav Nikolsky authored
We're going to bridge Polkadot Bridge Hub with [Polkadot Bulletin chain](https://github.com/zdave-parity/polkadot-bulletin-chain) soon (and Rococo Bridge Hub with 1:1 copy of Polkadot Bulletin chain even sooner), so we need a variant for that chain in `NetworkId`. As suggested, I'm adding a new variant for it to the `NetworkId` (we may have used `ByGenesis(_)`, but decision was made to have a dedicated variant for that).
-
Ross Bulat authored
Addresses #409. This request has been raised by multiple community members - the ability for the nomination pool root role to configure permissionless commission claiming: > Would it be possible to have a claim_commission_other extrinsic for claiming commission of nomination pools permissionless? This PR does not quite introduce this additional call, but amends `do_claim_commission` to check a new `claim_permission` field in the `Commission` struct, configured by an enum: ``` enum CommissionClaimPermission { Permissionless, Account(AccountId), } ``` This can be optionally set in a bonded pool's `commission.claim_permission` field: ``` struct BondedPool { commission: { <snip> claim_permission: Option<CommissionClaimPermission<T::AccountId>>, }, <snip> } ``` This is a new field and requires a migration to add it to existing pools. This will be `None` on pool creation, falling back to the `root` role having sole access to claim commission if it is not set; this is the behaviour as it is today. Once set, the field _can_ be set to `None` again. #### Changes - [x] Add `commision.claim_permission` field. - [x] Add `can_claim_commission` and amend `do_claim_commission`. - [x] Add `set_commission_claim_permission` call. - [x] Test to cover new configs and call. - [x] Add and amend benchmarks. - [x] Generate new weights + slot into call `set_commission_claim_permission`. - [x] Add migration to introduce `commission.claim_permission`, bump storage version. - [x] Update Westend weights. - [x] Migration working. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Nov 27, 2023
-
-
Koute authored
Our executor currently only supports the WASM MVP feature set, however nowadays when compiling WASM the Rust compiler has more features enabled by default. We do set the `-C target-cpu=mvp` flag to make sure that *our* code gets compiled in a way that is compatible with our executor, however this doesn't affect Rust's standard library crates (`std`, `core` and `alloc`) which are by default precompiled and still can make use of these extra features. So in this PR we force the compiler to also compile the standard library crates for us to make sure that they also only use the MVP features. I've added the `WASM_BUILD_STD` environment variable which can be used to disable this behavior if set to `0`. Unfortunately this *will* slow down the compile times when building runtimes, but there isn't much that we can do about that. Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1755 --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
Maciej authored
**Overview:** Adding an extra malus variant focusing on disputing finalized blocks. It will: - wrap around approval-voting - listen to `OverseerSignal::BlockFinalized` and when encountered start a dispute for the `dispute_offset`th ancestor - simply pass through all other messages and signals Add zombienet tests testing various edgecases: - disputing freshly finalized blocks - disputing stale finalized blocks - disputing eagerly pruned finalized blocks (might be separate PR) **TODO:** - [x] Register new malus variant - [x] Simple pass through wrapper (approval-voting) - [x] Simple network definition - [x] Listen to block finalizations - [x] Fetch ancestor hash - [x] Fetch session index - [x] Fetch candidate - [x] Construct and send dispute message - [x] zndsl test 1 checking that disputes on fresh finalizations resolve valid Closes #1365 - [x] zndsl test 2 checking that disputes for too old finalized blocks are not possible Closes #1364 - [ ] zndsl test 3 checking that disputes for candidates with eagerly pruned relay parent state are handled correctly #1359 (deferred to a separate PR) - [x] Unit tests for new malus variant (testing cli etc) - [x] Clean/streamline error handling - [ ] ~~Ensure it tests properly on session boundaries~~ --------- Co-authored-by: Javier Viola <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Marcin S. <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tsvetomir Dimitrov <[email protected]>
-
Chevdor authored
## Overview This PR aligns the `spec_version` formatting to the [recent changes](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/26/files#diff-efa4caeb17487ecb13d8f5eb7863c3241d84afa2e73fbf25909a2ca89df0f362R142) made for the Polkadot/Kusama runtimes. It also backports the latest version `v1.4.0` bumps as `1_004_000`. ## Details During the switch from `v0.9` to `v1.x`, the format of the `spec_version` was modified from: `(M)m_ppp` for a runtime considered on version `M.m.pp`. For instance `0.9.42` had a `spec_version` of `9420`. With the transition to `v1.x`, the format was changed to a bigger number (still `u32`) formatted as `MM_mm_ppp` where `1.2.3` would be stored as `01_02_003`. This PR aligns the format with that has been introduced in the fellowship repo: `MMM_mmm_ppp`. --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 25, 2023
-
-
Marcin S. authored
-
- Nov 24, 2023
-
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
Use non-zero weight limit in benchmarking `pallet_xcm::execute()` so the given XCM actually executes.
-
Julian Eager authored
closes #2194 cc @mrcnski --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
Xiliang Chen authored
On extrinsics/call, ensure local XCM execution is complete/successful. Otherwise, fail the extrinsic so that state changes don't get committed to the db. Added regression tests that fail without the fix. fixes #2237 --------- Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 23, 2023
-
-
André Silva authored
Broken after #2446.
-
Bastian Köcher authored
This moves the macro related re-exports to `__private` to make it more obvious for downstream users that they are using an internal api. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Nov 22, 2023
-
-
Michal Kucharczyk authored
The out-dated version (bad tag) of [polkadot image](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/ede4a362 /.gitlab/pipeline/zombienet/cumulus.yml#L31) ([docker info](https://hub.docker.com/layers/paritypr/polkadot-debug/master/images/sha256:adb1658052cf671b50c90d5cece5c7a131efa1a95978249bd5cb85a5ad654f7a?context=explore)) was used. This PR fixes this. See also: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2411#issuecomment-1822632724 Also adds an abstraction that allows asynchronous backends to be passed to `ChainApiSubsystem` --------- Co-authored-by: Sebastian Kunert <[email protected]>
-
Marcin S. authored
-
Ross Bulat authored
Deprecates `RewardDestination::Controller` variant. - [x] `RewardDestination::Controller` annotated with `#[deprecated]`. - [x] `Controller` variant is now handled the same way as `Stash` in `payout_stakers`. - [x] `set_payee` errors if `RewardDestination::Controller` is provided. - [x] Added `update_payee` call to lazily migrate `RewardDestination::Controller` `Payee` storage entries to `RewardDestination::Account(controller)` . - [x] `payout_stakers_dead_controller` has been removed from benches & weights - was not used. - [x] Tests no longer use `RewardDestination::Controller`. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 21, 2023
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
Adding on top of the new builder pattern for creating XCM programs, I'm adding some more APIs: ```rust let paying_fees: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder() // Only allow paying for fees .withdraw_asset() // First instruction has to load the holding register .buy_execution() // Second instruction has to be `buy_execution` .build(); let paying_fees_invalid: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder() .withdraw_asset() .build(); // Invalid, need to pay for fees let not_paying_fees: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder_unpaid() .unpaid_execution() // Needed .withdraw_asset() .deposit_asset() .build(); let all_goes: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder_unsafe() // You can do anything .withdraw_asset() .deposit_asset() .build(); ``` The invalid bits are because the methods don't even exist on the types that you'd want to call them on. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
Marcin S. authored
-
Javier Viola authored
Follow up from https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2370 to add `output` positional argument to undying-collator. cc @JoshOrndorff --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
Julian Eager authored
-
- Nov 20, 2023
-
-
jserrat authored
Hey guys, as discussed I've changed the name to a more general one `PvfExecKind`, is this good or too general? Creating this as a draft, I still have to fix the tests. Closes #1585 Kusama address: FkB6QEo8VnV3oifugNj5NeVG3Mvq1zFbrUu4P5YwRoe5mQN --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Marcin S <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 19, 2023
-
-
Julian Eager authored
Co-authored-by: Marcin S <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 17, 2023
-
-
Bruno Galvao authored
The versioned migrations are already there in pallet nomination-pools: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/f6ee4781/substrate/frame/nomination-pools/src/migration.rs#L27-L48 Just updating the kitchensink runtime to point to them. This is also nice because it points the dev to an example of how to use `VersionedMigration`.
-
- Nov 16, 2023
-
-
joe petrowski authored
Missed in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1672
-
ordian authored
cc @joepetrowski
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
Westend now successfully updated to `spec: 103000`, we **have to remove** the session keys migration before the next release as it doesn't gracefully handle reapplying it.
-
- Nov 15, 2023
-
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
Refunding surplus happens anyway on xcm_executor::post_process(), automatically refunding surplus to original_origin at the end of execution. Since SovereignPaidRemoteExporter doesn't ClearOrigin, it can simply rely on the automatic mechanism. Furthermore, RefundSurplus instruction refunds _surplus_. Surplus exists only as a result of Transact, SetErrorHandler or SetAppendix instructions, none of which being part of the SovereignPaidRemoteExporter XCM program. So surplus is always zero here anyway.
-
joe petrowski authored
The goal of this PR is to migrate Identity deposits from the Relay Chain to a system parachain. The problem I want to solve is that `IdentityOf` and `SubsOf` both store an amount that's held in reserve as a storage deposit. When migrating to a parachain, we can take a snapshot of the actual `IdentityInfo` and sub-account mappings, but should migrate (off chain) the `deposit`s to zero, since the chain (and by extension, accounts) won't have any funds at genesis. The good news is that we expect parachain deposits to be significantly lower (possibly 100x) on the parachain. That is, a deposit of 21 DOT on the Relay Chain would need 0.21 DOT on a parachain. This PR proposes to migrate the deposits in the following way: 1. Introduces a new pallet with two extrinsics: - `reap_identity`: Has a configurable `ReapOrigin`, which would be set to `EnsureSigned` on the Relay Chain (i.e. callable by anyone) and `EnsureRoot` on the parachain (we don't want identities reaped from there). - `poke_deposit`: Checks what deposit the pallet holds (at genesis, zero) and attempts to update the amount based on the calculated deposit for storage data. 2. `reap_identity` clears all storage data for a `target` account and unreserves their deposit. 3. A `ReapIdentityHandler` teleports the necessary DOT to the parachain and calls `poke_deposit`. Since the parachain deposit is much lower, and was just unreserved, we know we have enough. One awkwardness I ran into was that the XCMv3 instruction set does not provide a way for the system to teleport assets without a fee being deducted on reception. Users shouldn't have to pay a fee for the system to migrate their info to a more efficient location. So I wrote my own program and did the `InitiateTeleport` accounting on my own to send a program with `UnpaidExecution`. Have discussed an `InitiateUnpaidTeleport` instruction with @franciscoaguirre . Obviously any chain executing this would have to pass a `Barrier` for free execution. TODO: - [x] Confirm People Chain ParaId - [x] Confirm People Chain deposit rates (determined in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2281) - [x] Add pallet to Westend --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
Disallow reserve transfers that use teleportable fees if `(origin, fees)` matches `XcmTeleportFilter`. Add regression tests for filtering based on `XcmTeleportFilter` for both `(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets()` and `(limited_)teleport_assets` extrinsics.
-
- Nov 14, 2023
-
-
PG Herveou authored
This PR introduces: - XCM host functions `xcm_send`, `xcm_execute` - An Xcm trait into the config. that proxy these functions to to `pallet_xcm`, or disable their usage by using `()`. - A mock_network and xcm_test files to test the newly added xcm-related functions. --------- Co-authored-by: Keith Yeung <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sasha Gryaznov <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alexander Theißen <[email protected]>
-
Alin Dima authored
Adds a `NodeFeatures` bitfield value to the runtime `HostConfiguration`, with the purpose of coordinating the enabling of node-side features, such as: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/628 and https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/598. These are features that require all validators enable them at the same time, assuming all/most nodes have upgraded their node versions. This PR doesn't add any feature yet. These are coming in future PRs. Also adds a runtime API for querying the state of the client features and an extrinsic for setting/unsetting a feature by its index in the bitfield. Note: originally part of: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1644, but posted as standalone to be reused by other PRs until the initial PR is merged
-
Kristian Sosnin authored
Fixes #1437 Co-authored-by: Sophia Gold <[email protected]>
-
jserrat authored
Co-authored-by: Marcin S <[email protected]>
-
Marcin S. authored
-
Branislav Kontur authored
## Problem/Motivation The benchmark for the `ExpectPallet` XCM instruction uses a hard-coded version `4.0.0` for the `frame_system` pallet. Unfortunately, this doesn't work for the `polkadot-fellows/runtimes` repository, where we use dependencies from `crates.io`, e.g., [frame-system::23.0.0.0](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/blob/dd7f86f0d50064481ed0b7c0218494a5cfad997e/relay/kusama/Cargo.toml#L83). Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2284 ## Solution This PR fixes the benchmarks that require pallet information and enables the runtime to provide the correct/custom pallet information. The default implementation provides `frame_system::Pallet` with index `0`, where the version is not hard-coded but read from the runtime. ## Local testing Added log for `T::valid_pallet` to the benchmarks like: ``` let valid_pallet = T::valid_pallet(); log::info!( target: "frame::benchmark::pallet", "valid_pallet: {}::{}::{}::{}::{}", valid_pallet.index, valid_pallet.module_name, valid_pallet.crate_version.major, valid_pallet.crate_version.minor, valid_pallet.crate_version.patch, ); ``` Run benchmarks for `westend`: ``` cargo run --bin=polkadot --features=runtime-benchmarks -- benchmark pallet --steps=2 --repeat=1 --extrinsic=* --heap-pages=4096 --json-file=./bench.json --chain=westend-dev --template=./polkadot/xcm/pallet-xcm-benchmarks/template.hbs --pallet=pallet_xcm_benchmarks::generic --output=./polkadot/runtime/westend/src/weights/xcm ``` --- For actual `frame_system` version: ``` [package] name = "frame-system" version = "4.0.0-dev" ``` Log dump: ``` 2023-11-13 12:56:45 Starting benchmark: pallet_xcm_benchmarks::generic::query_pallet 2023-11-13 12:56:45 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::4::0::0 2023-11-13 12:56:45 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::4::0::0 2023-11-13 12:56:45 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::4::0::0 2023-11-13 12:56:45 Starting benchmark: pallet_xcm_benchmarks::generic::expect_pallet 2023-11-13 12:56:45 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::4::0::0 2023-11-13 12:56:45 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::4::0::0 2023-11-13 12:56:45 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::4::0::0 ``` For changed `frame_system` version: ``` [package] name = "frame-system" version = "5.1.3-dev" ``` Log dump: ``` 2023-11-13 12:51:51 Starting benchmark: pallet_xcm_benchmarks::generic::query_pallet 2023-11-13 12:51:51 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::5::1::3 2023-11-13 12:51:51 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::5::1::3 2023-11-13 12:51:51 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::5::1::3 2023-11-13 12:51:51 Starting benchmark: pallet_xcm_benchmarks::generic::expect_pallet 2023-11-13 12:51:51 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::5::1::3 2023-11-13 12:51:51 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::5::1::3 2023-11-13 12:51:51 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::5::1::3 ``` ## References Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2284
-
Alin Dima authored
Collators were previously reencoding the available data and checking the erasure root. Replace that with just checking the PoV hash, which consumes much less CPU and takes less time. We also don't need to check the `PersistedValidationData` hash, as collators don't use it. Reason: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/575#issuecomment-1806572230 After systematic chunks recovery is merged, collators will no longer do any reed-solomon encoding/decoding, which has proven to be a great CPU consumer. Signed-off-by: alindima <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 13, 2023
-
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
## Motivation `pallet-xcm` is the main user-facing interface for XCM functionality, including assets manipulation functions like `teleportAssets()` and `reserve_transfer_assets()` calls. While `teleportAsset()` works both ways, `reserve_transfer_assets()` works only for sending reserve-based assets to a remote destination and beneficiary when the reserve is the _local chain_. ## Solution This PR enhances `pallet_xcm::(limited_)reserve_withdraw_assets` to support transfers when reserves are other chains. This will allow complete, **bi-directional** reserve-based asset transfers user stories using `pallet-xcm`. Enables following scenarios: - transferring assets with local reserve (was previously supported iff asset used as fee also had local reserve - now it works in all cases), - transferring assets with reserve on destination, - transferring assets with reserve on remote/third-party chain (iff assets and fees have same remote reserve), - transferring assets with reserve different than the reserve of the asset to be used as fees - meaning can be used to transfer random asset with local/dest reserve while using DOT for fees on all involved chains, even if DOT local/dest reserve doesn't match asset reserve, - transferring assets with any type of local/dest reserve while using fees which can be teleported between involved chains. All of the above is done by pallet inner logic without the user having to specify which scenario/reserves/teleports/etc. The correct scenario and corresponding XCM programs are identified, and respectively, built automatically based on runtime configuration of trusted teleporters and trusted reserves. #### Current limitations: - while `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CAN have different reserves (or fees CAN be teleported), the remaining "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT, among themselves, have different reserve locations (this is also implicitly enforced by `MAX_ASSETS_FOR_TRANSFER=2`, but this can be safely increased in the future). - `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT have **different remote** reserves (this could also be supported in the future, but adds even more complexity while possibly not being worth it - we'll see what the future holds). Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1584 Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2055 --------- Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>
-
Bastian Köcher authored
Remove the `GRANDPA_AUTHORITIES_KEY` key and its usage. Apparently this was used in the early days to communicate the grandpa authorities to the node. However, we have now a runtime api that does this for us. So, this pull request is moving from the custom managed storage item to a FRAME managed storage item. This pr also includes a migration for doing the switch on a running chain. --------- Co-authored-by: Davide Galassi <[email protected]>
-
Marcin S. authored
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 10, 2023
-
-
PG Herveou authored
We are introducing a new set of `XcmController` traits (final name yet to be determined). These traits are implemented by `pallet-xcm` and allows other pallets, such as `pallet_contracts`, to rely on these traits instead of tight coupling them to `pallet-xcm`. Using only the existing Xcm traits would mean duplicating the logic from `pallet-xcm` in these other pallets, which we aim to avoid. Our objective is to ensure that when these APIs are called from `pallet-contracts`, they produce the exact same outcomes as if called directly from `pallet-xcm`. The other benefits is that we can also expose return values to `pallet-contracts` instead of just calling `pallet-xcm` dispatchable and getting a `DispatchResult` back. See traits integration in this PR https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1248, where the traits are used as follow to define and implement `pallet-contracts` Config. ```rs // Contracts config: pub trait Config: frame_system::Config { // ... /// A type that exposes XCM APIs, allowing contracts to interact with other parachains, and /// execute XCM programs. type Xcm: xcm_executor::traits::Controller< OriginFor<Self>, <Self as frame_system::Config>::RuntimeCall, BlockNumberFor<Self>, >; } // implementation impl pallet_contracts::Config for Runtime { // ... type Xcm = pallet_xcm::Pallet<Self>; } ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Alexander Theißen <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
Liam Aharon authored
As suggested by @ggwpez (https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2142#discussion_r1388145872), remove the `VersionChecked` prefix from version checked migrations (but leave `VersionUnchecked` prefixes) --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Nov 09, 2023
-
-
Lulu authored
The staging- rename commit was missing from the last PR for some reason.
-