- Apr 12, 2024
-
-
Xiliang Chen authored
Implements https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/RFCs/issues/82 Allow any parachain to have bidirectional channel with any system parachains Looking for initial feedbacks before continue finish it TODOs: - [x] docs - [x] benchmarks - [x] tests --------- Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
-
- Apr 11, 2024
-
-
Andrei Sandu authored
Same issue but about av-cores was fixed in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1403 Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>
-
- Apr 10, 2024
-
-
Matteo Muraca authored
Part of #3326 @Kianenigma @ggwpez polkadot address: 12poSUQPtcF1HUPQGY3zZu2P8emuW9YnsPduA4XG3oCEfJVp --------- Signed-off-by: Matteo Muraca <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]>
-
Egor_P authored
This PR backports `spec_version`, `node_version` bumps and reordering of the prdocs from the 1.10.0 release branch
-
- Apr 09, 2024
-
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
We are exploring [allowing this for Kusama](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/261) as well, disallowing on test chains seems unnecessarily limiting.
-
Ankan authored
closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3894 Allows Nomination Pool configuration to be set by a custom origin instead of root. In runtimes, we would set this to be `StakingAdmin`, same as for pallet-staking. --------- Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]>
-
- Apr 08, 2024
-
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
This MR contains two major changes and some maintenance cleanup. ## 1. Free Standing Pallet Benchmark Runner Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3045, depends on your runtime exposing the `GenesisBuilderApi` (like https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1492). Introduces a new binary crate: `frame-omni-bencher`. It allows to directly benchmark a WASM blob - without needing a node or chain spec. This makes it much easier to generate pallet weights and should allow us to remove bloaty code from the node. It should work for all FRAME runtimes that dont use 3rd party host calls or non `BlakeTwo256` block hashing (basically all polkadot parachains should work). It is 100% backwards compatible with the old CLI args, when the `v1` compatibility command is used. This is done to allow for forwards compatible addition of new commands. ### Example (full example in the Rust docs) Installing the CLI: ```sh cargo install --locked --path subs...
-
- Apr 05, 2024
-
-
Andrei Sandu authored
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>
-
- Apr 04, 2024
-
-
Michal Kucharczyk authored
The runtime now can provide a number of predefined presets of `RuntimeGenesisConfig` struct. This presets are intended to be used in different deployments, e.g.: `local`, `staging`, etc, and should be included into the corresponding chain-specs. Having `GenesisConfig` presets in runtime allows to fully decouple node from runtime types (the problem is described in #1984). **Summary of changes:** - The `GenesisBuilder` API was adjusted to enable this functionality (and provide better naming - #150): ```rust fn preset_names() -> Vec<PresetId>; fn get_preset(id: Option<PresetId>) -> Option<serde_json::Value>; //`None` means default fn build_state(value: serde_json::Value); pub struct PresetId(Vec<u8>); ``` - **Breaking change**: Old `create_default_config` method was removed, `build_config` was renamed to `build_state`. As a consequence a node won't be able to interact with genesis config for older runtimes. The cleanup was made for sake of API simplicity. Also IMO maintaining compatibility with old API is not so crucial. - Reference implementation was provided for `substrate-test-runtime` and `rococo` runtimes. For rococo new [`genesis_configs_presets`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/3b41d66b/polkadot/runtime/rococo/src/genesis_config_presets.rs#L530) module was added and is used in `GenesisBuilder` [_presets-related_](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/3b41d66b/polkadot/runtime/rococo/src/lib.rs#L2462-L2485) methods. - The `chain-spec-builder` util was also improved and allows to ([_doc_](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/3b41d66b/substrate/bin/utils/chain-spec-builder/src/lib.rs#L19)): - list presets provided by given runtime (`list-presets`), - display preset or default config provided by the runtime (`display-preset`), - build chain-spec using named preset (`create ... named-preset`), - The `ChainSpecBuilder` is extended with [`with_genesis_config_preset_name`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/3b41d66b/substrate/client/chain-spec/src/chain_spec.rs#L447) method which allows to build chain-spec using named preset provided by the runtime. Sample usage on the node side [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/2caffaae /polkadot/node/service/src/chain_spec.rs#L404). Implementation of #1984. fixes: #150 part of: #25 --------- Co-authored-by: Sebastian Kunert <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
-
Liam Aharon authored
Part of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/226 Related https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1833 - Deprecate `CurrencyAdapter` and introduce `FungibleAdapter` - Deprecate `ToStakingPot` and replace usage with `ResolveTo` - Required creating a new `StakingPotAccountId` struct that implements `TypedGet` for the staking pot account ID - Update parachain common utils `DealWithFees`, `ToAuthor` and `AssetsToBlockAuthor` implementations to use `fungible` - Update runtime XCM Weight Traders to use `ResolveTo` instead of `ToStakingPot` - Update runtime Transaction Payment pallets to use `FungibleAdapter` instead of `CurrencyAdapter` - [x] Blocked by https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1296, needs the `Unbalanced::decrease_balance` fix
-
- Apr 02, 2024
-
-
Dastan authored
migrations: prevent accidentally using unversioned migrations instead of `VersionedMigration` (#3835) closes #1324 #### Problem Currently, it is possible to accidentally use inner unversioned migration instead of `VersionedMigration` since both implement `OnRuntimeUpgrade`. #### Solution With this change, we make it clear that value of `Inner` is not intended to be used directly. It is achieved by bounding `Inner` to new trait `UncheckedOnRuntimeUpgrade`, which has the same interface (except `unchecked_` prefix) as `OnRuntimeUpgrade`. #### `try-runtime` functions Since developers can implement `try-runtime` for `Inner` value in `VersionedMigration` and have custom logic for it, I added the same `try-runtime` functions to `UncheckedOnRuntimeUpgrade`. I looked for a ways to not duplicate functions, but couldn't find anything that doesn't significantly change the codebase. So I would appreciate If you have any suggestions to improve this cc @liamaharon @xlc polkadot address: 16FqwPZ8GRC5U5D4Fu7W33nA55ZXzXGWHwmbnE1eT6pxuqcT --------- Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]>
-
Serban Iorga authored
Working towards migrating the `parity-bridges-common` repo inside `polkadot-sdk`. This PR upgrades some dependencies in order to align them with the versions used in `parity-bridges-common` Related to https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2538
-
Bastian Köcher authored
When using `schedule_code_upgrade` to change the code of a parachain in the relay chain runtime, we had already fixed to not set the `GoAhead` signal. This was done to not brick any parachain after the upgrade, because they were seeing the signal without having any upgrade prepared. The remaining problem is that the parachain code is only upgraded after a parachain header was enacted, aka the parachain made some progress. However, this is quite complicated if the parachain is bricked (which is the most common scenario why to manually schedule a code upgrade). Thus, this pull request replaces `SetGoAhead` with `UpgradeStrategy` to signal to the logic kind of strategy want to use. The strategies are either `SetGoAheadSignal` or `ApplyAtExpectedBlock`. `SetGoAheadSignal` sets the go ahead signal as before and awaits a parachain block. `ApplyAtExpectedBlock` schedules the upgrade and applies it directly at the `expected_block` without waiting for the parachain to make any kind of progress.
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
Fix "double-weights" for extrinsics, use only the ones benchmarked in the runtime. Deprecate extrinsics that don't specify WeightLimit, remove their usage across the repo. --------- Signed-off-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Apr 01, 2024
-
-
s0me0ne-unkn0wn authored
Rejoice! Rejoice! The story is nearly over. This PR removes stale migrations, auxiliary structures, and package dependencies, thus making Rococo and Westend totally free from any `im-online`-related stuff. `im-online` still stays a part of the Substrate node and its runtime: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/0d932484/substrate/bin/node/runtime/src/lib.rs#L2276-L2277 I'm not sure if it makes sense to remove it from there considering that we're not removing `im-online` from FRAME. Please share your opinion.
-
Alexandru Gheorghe authored
Runtime release 1.2 includes bumping of the ParachainHost APIs up to v10, so let's move all the released APIs out of vstaging folder, this PR does not include any logic changes only renaming of the modules and some moving around. Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
-
Andrei Sandu authored
fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3886 --------- Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>
-
- Mar 29, 2024
-
-
s0me0ne-unkn0wn authored
Removes transient code introduced to clean up offchain database after `im-online` pallet removal. Should be merged after #2290 has been enacted.
-
- Mar 27, 2024
-
-
Gonçalo Pestana authored
This PR adds a new extrinsic `Call::restore_ledger ` gated by `StakingAdmin` origin that restores a corrupted staking ledger. This extrinsic will be used to recover ledgers that were affected by the issue discussed in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3245. The extrinsic will re-write the storage items associated with a stash account provided as input parameter. The data used to reset the ledger can be either i) fetched on-chain or ii) partially/totally set by the input parameters of the call. In order to use on-chain data to restore the staking locks, we need a way to read the current lock in the balances pallet. This PR adds a `InspectLockableCurrency` trait and implements it in the pallet balances. An alternative would be to tightly couple staking with the pallet balances but that's inelegant (an example of how it would look like in [this branch](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/tree/gpestana/ledger-badstate-clean_tightly)). More details on the type of corruptions and corresponding fixes https://hackmd.io/DLb5jEYWSmmvqXC9ae4yRg?view#/ We verified that the `Call::restore_ledger` does fix all current corrupted ledgers in Polkadot and Kusama. You can verify it here https://hackmd.io/v-XNrEoGRpe7APR-EZGhOA. **Changes introduced** - Adds `Call::restore_ledger ` extrinsic to recover a corrupted ledger; - Adds trait `frame_support::traits::currency::InspectLockableCurrency` to allow external pallets to read current locks given an account and lock ID; - Implements the `InspectLockableCurrency` in the pallet-balances. - Adds staking locks try-runtime checks (https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3751) **Todo** - [x] benchmark `Call::restore_ledger` - [x] throughout testing of all ledger recovering cases - [x] consider adding the staking locks try-runtime checks to this PR (https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3751) - [x] simulate restoring all ledgers (https://hackmd.io/Dsa2tvhISNSs7zcqriTaxQ?view) in Polkadot and Kusama using chopsticks -- https://hackmd.io/v-XNrEoGRpe7APR-EZGhOA Related to https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3245 Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3751 --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
Ermal Kaleci authored
This will make it possible to use remaining weight on idle for processing enqueued messages. More context here https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3709 --------- Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
-
Andrei Sandu authored
This works only for collators that implement the `collator_fn` allowing `collation-generation` subsystem to pull collations triggered on new heads. Also enables `request_v2::CollationFetchingResponse::CollationWithParentHeadData` for test adder/undying collators. TODO: - [x] fix tests - [x] new tests - [x] PR doc --------- Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
`execute` and `send` try to decode the xcm in the parameters before reaching the filter line. The new extrinsics decode only after the filter line. These should be used instead of the old ones. ## TODO - [x] Tests - [x] Generate weights - [x] Deprecation issue -> https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3771 - [x] PRDoc - [x] Handle error in pallet-contracts This would make writing XCMs in PJS Apps more difficult, but here's the fix for that: https://github.com/polkadot-js/apps/pull/10350. Already deployed! https://polkadot.js.org/apps/#/utilities/xcm Supersedes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1798/ --------- Co-authored-by: PG Herveou <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
-
- Mar 26, 2024
-
-
Pavel Orlov authored
The PR provides API for obtaining: - the weight required to execute an XCM message, - a list of acceptable `AssetId`s for message execution payment, - the cost of the weight in the specified acceptable `AssetId`. It is meant to address an issue where one has to guess how much fee to pay for execution. Also, at the moment, a client has to guess which assets are acceptable for fee execution payment. See the related issue https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/690. With this API, a client is supposed to query the list of the supported asset IDs (in the XCM version format the client understands), weigh the XCM program the client wants to execute and convert the weight into one of the acceptable assets. Note that the client is supposed to know what program will be executed on what chains. However, having a small companion JS library for the pallet-xcm and xtokens should be enough to determine what XCM programs will be executed and where (since these pallets compose a known small set of programs). ```Rust pub trait XcmPaymentApi<Call> where Call: Codec, { /// Returns a list of acceptable payment assets. /// /// # Arguments /// /// * `xcm_version`: Version. fn query_acceptable_payment_assets(xcm_version: Version) -> Result<Vec<VersionedAssetId>, Error>; /// Returns a weight needed to execute a XCM. /// /// # Arguments /// /// * `message`: `VersionedXcm`. fn query_xcm_weight(message: VersionedXcm<Call>) -> Result<Weight, Error>; /// Converts a weight into a fee for the specified `AssetId`. /// /// # Arguments /// /// * `weight`: convertible `Weight`. /// * `asset`: `VersionedAssetId`. fn query_weight_to_asset_fee(weight: Weight, asset: VersionedAssetId) -> Result<u128, Error>; /// Get delivery fees for sending a specific `message` to a `destination`. /// These always come in a specific asset, defined by the chain. /// /// # Arguments /// * `message`: The message that'll be sent, necessary because most delivery fees are based on the /// size of the message. /// * `destination`: The destination to send the message to. Different destinations may use /// different senders that charge different fees. fn query_delivery_fees(destination: VersionedLocation, message: VersionedXcm<()>) -> Result<VersionedAssets, Error>; } ``` An [example](https://gist.github.com/PraetorP/4bc323ff85401abe253897ba990ec29d) of a client side code. --------- Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Daniel Shiposha <[email protected]>
-
Tsvetomir Dimitrov authored
This PR notifies broker pallet for any parachain slot swaps performed on the relay chain. This is achieved by registering an `OnSwap` for the the `coretime` pallet. The hook sends XCM message to the broker chain and invokes a new extrinsic `swap_leases` which updates `Leases` storage item (which keeps the legacy parachain leases). I made two assumptions in this PR: 1. [`Leases`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/4987d798/substrate/frame/broker/src/lib.rs#L120) in `broker` pallet and [`Leases`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/4987d798 /polkadot/runtime/common/src/slots/mod.rs#L118) in `slots` pallet are in sync. 2. `swap_leases` extrinsic from `broker` pallet can be triggered only by root or by the XCM message from the relay chain. If not - the extrinsic will generate an error and do nothing. As a side effect from the changes `OnSwap` trait is moved from runtime/common/traits.rs to runtime/parachains. Otherwise it is not accessible from `broker` pallet. Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3552 TODOs: - [x] Weights - [x] Tests --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: eskimor <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
Dcompoze authored
**Update:** Pushed additional changes based on the review comments. **This pull request fixes various spelling mistakes in this repository.** Most of the changes are contained in the first **3** commits: - `Fix spelling mistakes in comments and docs` - `Fix spelling mistakes in test names` - `Fix spelling mistakes in error messages, panic messages, logs and tracing` Other source code spelling mistakes are separated into individual commits for easier reviewing: - `Fix the spelling of 'authority'` - `Fix the spelling of 'REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY'` - `Fix the spelling of 'prev_enqueud_messages'` - `Fix the spelling of 'endpoint'` - `Fix the spelling of 'children'` - `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSiblingSovereignAccount'` - `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSudoAccount'` - `Fix the spelling of 'insufficient'` - `Fix the spelling of 'PalletXcmExtrinsicsBenchmark'` - `Fix the spelling of 'subtracted'` - `Fix the spelling of 'CandidatePendingAvailability'` - `Fix the spelling of 'exclusive'` - `Fix the spelling of 'until'` - `Fix the spelling of 'discriminator'` - `Fix the spelling of 'nonexistent'` - `Fix the spelling of 'subsystem'` - `Fix the spelling of 'indices'` - `Fix the spelling of 'committed'` - `Fix the spelling of 'topology'` - `Fix the spelling of 'response'` - `Fix the spelling of 'beneficiary'` - `Fix the spelling of 'formatted'` - `Fix the spelling of 'UNKNOWN_PROOF_REQUEST'` - `Fix the spelling of 'succeeded'` - `Fix the spelling of 'reopened'` - `Fix the spelling of 'proposer'` - `Fix the spelling of 'InstantiationNonce'` - `Fix the spelling of 'depositor'` - `Fix the spelling of 'expiration'` - `Fix the spelling of 'phantom'` - `Fix the spelling of 'AggregatedKeyValue'` - `Fix the spelling of 'randomness'` - `Fix the spelling of 'defendant'` - `Fix the spelling of 'AquaticMammal'` - `Fix the spelling of 'transactions'` - `Fix the spelling of 'PassingTracingSubscriber'` - `Fix the spelling of 'TxSignaturePayload'` - `Fix the spelling of 'versioning'` - `Fix the spelling of 'descendant'` - `Fix the spelling of 'overridden'` - `Fix the spelling of 'network'` Let me know if this structure is adequate. **Note:** The usage of the words `Merkle`, `Merkelize`, `Merklization`, `Merkelization`, `Merkleization`, is somewhat inconsistent but I left it as it is. ~~**Note:** In some places the term `Receival` is used to refer to message reception, IMO `Reception` is the correct word here, but I left it as it is.~~ ~~**Note:** In some places the term `Overlayed` is used instead of the more acceptable version `Overlaid` but I also left it as it is.~~ ~~**Note:** In some places the term `Applyable` is used instead of the correct version `Applicable` but I also left it as it is.~~ **Note:** Some usage of British vs American english e.g. `judgement` vs `judgment`, `initialise` vs `initialize`, `optimise` vs `optimize` etc. are both present in different places, but I suppose that's understandable given the number of contributors. ~~**Note:** There is a spelling mistake in `.github/CODEOWNERS` but it triggers errors in CI when I make changes to it, so I left it as it is.~~
-
- Mar 23, 2024
-
-
eskimor authored
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3762 . --------- Co-authored-by: eskimor <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
-
- Mar 21, 2024
-
-
Alejandro Martinez Andres authored
Based on issue [#2512](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2512), it seems that some ecosystem teams are using these networks to set up their staging environments and test certain use cases, some of them involving sending XCMs from the relay with origins not allowed in the current configuration. This change reverts the configuration of `SendXcmOrigin`. --------- Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
-
Alin Dima authored
Changes needed to implement the runtime part of elastic scaling: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3131, https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3132, https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3202 Also fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3675 TODOs: - [x] storage migration - [x] optimise process_candidates from O(N^2) - [x] drop backable candidates which form cycles - [x] fix unit tests - [x] add more unit tests - [x] check the runtime APIs which use the pending availability storage. We need to expose all of them, see https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3576 - [x] optimise the candidate selection. we're currently picking randomly until we satisfy the weight limit. we need to be smart about not breaking candidate chains while being fair to all paras - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3573 Relies on the changes made in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3233 in terms of the inclusion policy and the candidate ordering --------- Signed-off-by: alindima <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: eskimor <[email protected]>
-
Egor_P authored
This PR backports: - node version bump - `spec_vesion` bump - reordering of the `prdocs` to the appropriate folder from the `1.9.0` release branch
-
gupnik authored
Step in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3688
-
- Mar 20, 2024
-
-
eskimor authored
We witnessed really poor performance on Rococo, where we ended up with 50 on-demand cores. This was due to the fact that for each core the full queue was processed. With this change full queue processing will happen way less often (most of the time complexity is O(1) or O(log(n))) and if it happens then only for one core (in expectation). Also spot price is now updated before each order to ensure economic back pressure. TODO: - [x] Implement - [x] Basic tests - [x] Add more tests (see todos) - [x] Run benchmark to confirm better performance, first results suggest > 100x faster. - [x] Write migrations - [x] Bump scale-info version and remove patch in Cargo.toml - [x] Write PR docs: on-demand performance improved, more on-demand cores are now non problematic anymore. If need by also the max queue size can be increased again. (Maybe not to 10k) Optional: Performance can be improved even more, if we called `pop_assignment_for_core()`, before calling `report_processed` (Avoid needless affinity drops). The effect gets smaller the larger the claim queue and I would only go for it, if it does not add complexity to the scheduler. --------- Co-authored-by: eskimor <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: antonva <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Anton Vilhelm Ásgeirsson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]>
-
Tsvetomir Dimitrov authored
The PR adds two things: 1. Runtime API exposing the whole claim queue 2. Consumes the API in `collation-generation` to fetch the next scheduled `ParaEntry` for an occupied core. Related to https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1797
-
- Mar 19, 2024
-
-
Davide Galassi authored
Introduces `CryptoBytes` type defined as: ```rust pub struct CryptoBytes<const N: usize, Tag = ()>(pub [u8; N], PhantomData<fn() -> Tag>); ``` The type implements a bunch of methods and traits which are typically expected from a byte array newtype (NOTE: some of the methods and trait implementations IMO are a bit redundant, but I decided to maintain them all to not change too much stuff in this PR) It also introduces two (generic) typical consumers of `CryptoBytes`: `PublicBytes` and `SignatureBytes`. ```rust pub struct PublicTag; pub PublicBytes<const N: usize, CryptoTag> = CryptoBytes<N, (PublicTag, CryptoTag)>; pub struct SignatureTag; pub SignatureBytes<const N: usize, CryptoTag> = CryptoBytes<N, (SignatureTag, CryptoTag)>; ``` Both of them use a tag to differentiate the two types at a higher level. Downstream specializations will further specialize using a dedicated crypto tag. For example in ECDSA: ```rust pub struct EcdsaTag; pub type Public = PublicBytes<PUBLIC_KEY_SERIALIZED_SIZE, EcdsaTag>; pub type Signature = PublicBytes<PUBLIC_KEY_SERIALIZED_SIZE, EcdsaTag>; ``` Overall we have a cleaner and most importantly **consistent** code for all the types involved All these details are opaque to the end user which can use `Public` and `Signature` for the cryptos as before
-
Matteo Muraca authored
Part of #3326 cc @Kianenigma @ggwpez @liamaharon polkadot address: 12poSUQPtcF1HUPQGY3zZu2P8emuW9YnsPduA4XG3oCEfJVp --------- Signed-off-by: Matteo Muraca <[email protected]>
-
Juan Ignacio Rios authored
Currently the xcm-executor returns an `Unimplemented` error if it receives any HRMP-related instruction. What I propose here, which is what we are currently doing in our forked executor at polimec, is to introduce a trait implemented by the executor which will handle those instructions. This way, if parachains want to keep the default behavior, they just use `()` and it will return unimplemented, but they can also implement their own logic to establish HRMP channels with other chains in an automated fashion, without requiring to go through governance. Our implementation is mentioned in the [polkadot HRMP docs](https://arc.net/l/quote/hduiivbu), and it was suggested to us to submit a PR to add these changes to polkadot-sdk. --------- Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Mar 17, 2024
-
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
Crowdloan account should burn all funds after a crowd loan got dissolved to ensure that the account is reaped correctly. --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
-
- Mar 15, 2024
-
-
Andrei Sandu authored
Extracted Benchbuilder enhancements used in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3644 . Might still require some work to fully support all scenarios when disputing elastic scaling parachains, but it should be useful in writing elastic scaling runtime tests. --------- Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>
-
gupnik authored
Step in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/171 This PR removes `as [disambiguation_path]` syntax from `derive_impl` usage across the polkadot-sdk as introduced in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3505
-
- Mar 14, 2024
-
-
Dino Pačandi authored
Make Rococo & Westend XCM's location converter `HashedDescription` more in line with Polkadot/Kusama runtimes. Co-authored-by: Muharem <[email protected]>
-
- Mar 13, 2024
-
-
georgepisaltu authored
Revert "FRAME: Create `TransactionExtension` as a replacement for `SignedExtension` (#2280)" (#3665) This PR reverts #2280 which introduced `TransactionExtension` to replace `SignedExtension`. As a result of the discussion [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3623#issuecomment-1986789700), the changes will be reverted for now with plans to reintroduce the concept in the future. --------- Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]>
-