Skip to content
  1. Apr 24, 2024
  2. Apr 23, 2024
  3. Apr 22, 2024
  4. Apr 20, 2024
    • thiolliere's avatar
      Fix case in type in macro generation (#4223) · f3c3ebb6
      thiolliere authored
      Generated type is not camel case this generate some warnings from IDE
      
      label should be R0
      f3c3ebb6
    • Ankan's avatar
      Allow privileged virtual bond in Staking pallet (#3889) · e504c41a
      Ankan authored
      This is the first PR in preparation for
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/454.
      
      ## Follow ups:
      - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3904.
      - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3905.
      
      Overall changes are documented here (lot more visual 😍):
      https://hackmd.io/@ak0n/454-np-governance
      
      [Maybe followup](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4217)
      with migration of storage item `VirtualStakers` as a bool or enum in
      `Ledger`.
      
      ## Context
      We want to achieve a way for a user (`Delegator`) to delegate their
      funds to another account (`Agent`). Delegate implies the funds are
      locked in delegator account itself. Agent can act on behalf of delegator
      to stake directly on Staking pallet.
      
      The delegation feature is added to Staking via another pallet
      `delegated-staking` worked on
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3904).
      
      ## Introduces:
      ### StakingUnchecked Trait
      As the name implies, this trait allows unchecked (non-locked) mutation
      of staking ledger. These apis are only meant to be used by other pallets
      in the runtime and should not be exposed directly to user code path.
      Also related: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3888.
      
      ### Virtual Bond
      Allows other pallets to stake via staking pallet while managing the
      locks on these accounts themselves. Introduces another storage
      `VirtualStakers` that whitelist these accounts.
      
      We also restrict virtual stakers to set reward account as themselves.
      Since the account has no locks, we cannot support compounding of
      rewards. Conservatively, we require them to set a separate account
      different from the staker. Since these are code managed, it should be
      easy for another pallet to redistribute reward and rebond them.
      
      ### Slashes
      Since there is no actual lock maintained by staking-pallet for virtual
      stakers, this pallet does not apply any slashes. It is then important
      for pallets managing virtual stakers to listen to slashing events and
      apply necessary slashes.
      e504c41a
  5. Apr 19, 2024
  6. Apr 18, 2024