Skip to content
  1. Feb 13, 2024
  3. Feb 12, 2024
  5. Feb 11, 2024
  7. Feb 09, 2024
  9. Feb 08, 2024
  11. Feb 06, 2024
    • Andrei Eres's avatar
      subsystem-bench: Prepare CI output (#3158) · 9e6298e7
      Andrei Eres authored 
      

1. Benchmark results are collected in a single struct.
2. The output of the results is prettified.
3. The result struct used to save the output as a yaml and store it in
artifacts in a CI job.

```
$ cargo run -p polkadot-subsystem-bench --release -- test-sequence --path polkadot/node/subsystem-bench/examples/availability_read.yaml | tee output.txt
$ cat output.txt

polkadot/node/subsystem-bench/examples/availability_read.yaml #1

Network usage, KiB                     total   per block
Received from peers               510796.000  170265.333
Sent to peers                        221.000      73.667

CPU usage, s                           total   per block
availability-recovery                 38.671      12.890
Test environment                       0.255       0.085


polkadot/node/subsystem-bench/examples/availability_read.yaml #2

Network usage, KiB                     total   per block
Received from peers               413633.000  137877.667
Sent to peers                        353.000     117.667

CPU usage, s                           total   per block
availability-recovery                 52.630      17.543
Test environment                       0.271       0.090


polkadot/node/subsystem-bench/examples/availability_read.yaml #3

Network usage, KiB                     total   per block
Received from peers               424379.000  141459.667
Sent to peers                        703.000     234.333

CPU usage, s                           total   per block
availability-recovery                 51.128      17.043
Test environment                       0.502       0.167

```

```
$ cargo run -p polkadot-subsystem-bench --release -- --ci test-sequence --path polkadot/node/subsystem-bench/examples/availability_read.yaml | tee output.txt
$ cat output.txt
- benchmark_name: 'polkadot/node/subsystem-bench/examples/availability_read.yaml #1'
  network:
  - resource: Received from peers
    total: 509011.0
    per_block: 169670.33333333334
  - resource: Sent to peers
    total: 220.0
    per_block: 73.33333333333333
  cpu:
  - resource: availability-recovery
    total: 31.845848445
    per_block: 10.615282815
  - resource: Test environment
    total: 0.23582828799999941
    per_block: 0.07860942933333313

- benchmark_name: 'polkadot/node/subsystem-bench/examples/availability_read.yaml #2'
  network:
  - resource: Received from peers
    total: 411738.0
    per_block: 137246.0
  - resource: Sent to peers
    total: 351.0
    per_block: 117.0
  cpu:
  - resource: availability-recovery
    total: 18.93596025099999
    per_block: 6.31198675033333
  - resource: Test environment
    total: 0.2541994199999979
    per_block: 0.0847331399999993

- benchmark_name: 'polkadot/node/subsystem-bench/examples/availability_read.yaml #3'
  network:
  - resource: Received from peers
    total: 424548.0
    per_block: 141516.0
  - resource: Sent to peers
    total: 703.0
    per_block: 234.33333333333334
  cpu:
  - resource: availability-recovery
    total: 16.54178526900001
    per_block: 5.513928423000003
  - resource: Test environment
    total: 0.43960946299999537
    per_block: 0.14653648766666513
```

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
      9e6298e7
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      [pallet_xcm] Forgotten migration to XCMv4 + added `try-state` to the `pallet_xcm` (#3228) · 8c1c99f0
      Branislav Kontur authored 
      Relates to: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3214

## TODO

- [ ] backport to the `1.7.0` release
      8c1c99f0
    • Oliver Tale-Yazdi's avatar
      Ranked collective `Add`+`Remove` origins (#3212) · c552fb54
      Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored 
      Superseeds https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1245  

This PR is a migration of the
https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/14577

.

The PR added associated types (`AddOrigin` & `RemoveOrigin`) to
`Config`. It allows you to decouple types and areas of responsibility,
since at the moment the same types are responsible for adding and
promoting(removing and demoting). This will improve the flexibility of
the pallet configuration.

```
/// The origin required to add a member.
type AddOrigin: EnsureOrigin<Self::RuntimeOrigin, Success = ()>;

/// The origin required to remove a member. The success value indicates the
/// maximum rank *from which* the removal may be.
type RemoveOrigin: EnsureOrigin<Self::RuntimeOrigin, Success = Rank>;
```
To achieve the backward compatibility, the users of the pallet can use
the old type via the new morph:

```
type AddOrigin = MapSuccess<Self::PromoteOrigin, Ignore>;
type RemoveOrigin = Self::DemoteOrigin;
```

---------

Signed-off-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarPraetorP <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarPavel Orlov <[email protected]>
      c552fb54
    • Alin Dima's avatar
      prospective-parachains: respond with multiple backable candidates (#3160) · 7df1ae3b
      Alin Dima authored 
      Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3129
      7df1ae3b
  13. Feb 05, 2024
    • Alexandru Gheorghe's avatar
      Introduce approval-voting/distribution benchmark (#2621) · f9f88688
      Alexandru Gheorghe authored 
      ## Summary
Built on top of the tooling and ideas introduced in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2528, this PR introduces
a synthetic benchmark for measuring and assessing the performance
characteristics of the approval-voting and approval-distribution
subsystems.

Currently this allows, us to simulate the behaviours of these systems
based on the following dimensions:
```
TestConfiguration:
# Test 1
- objective: !ApprovalsTest
    last_considered_tranche: 89
    min_coalesce: 1
    max_coalesce: 6
    enable_assignments_v2: true
    send_till_tranche: 60
    stop_when_approved: false
    coalesce_tranche_diff: 12
    workdir_prefix: "/tmp"
    num_no_shows_per_candidate: 0
    approval_distribution_expected_tof: 6.0
    approval_distribution_cpu_ms: 3.0
    approval_voting_cpu_ms: 4.30
  n_validators: 500
  n_cores: 100
  n_included_candidates: 100
  min_pov_size: 1120
  max_pov_size: 5120
  peer_bandwidth: 524288000000
  bandwidth: 524288000000
  latency:
    min_latency:
      secs: 0
      nanos: 1000000
    max_latency:
      secs: 0
      nanos: 100000000
  error: 0
  num_blocks: 10
```

## The approach
1. We build a real overseer with the real implementations for
approval-voting and approval-distribution subsystems.
2. For a given network size, for each validator we pre-computed all
potential assignments and approvals it would send, because this a
computation heavy operation this will be cached on a file on disk and be
re-used if the generation parameters don't change.
3. The messages will be sent accordingly to the configured parameters
and those are split into 3 main benchmarking scenarios.

## Benchmarking scenarios

### Best case scenario *approvals_throughput_best_case.yaml*
It send to the approval-distribution only the minimum required tranche
to gathered the needed_approvals, so that a candidate is approved.

### Behaviour in the presence of no-shows *approvals_no_shows.yaml*
It sends the tranche needed to approve a candidate when we have a
maximum of *num_no_shows_per_candidate* tranches with no-shows for each
candidate.

### Maximum throughput *approvals_throughput.yaml*
It sends all the tranches for each block and measures the used CPU and
necessary network bandwidth. by the approval-voting and
approval-distribution subsystem.

## How to run it
```
cargo run -p polkadot-subsystem-bench --release -- test-sequence --path polkadot/node/subsystem-bench/examples/approvals_throughput.yaml
```

## Evaluating performance
### Use the real subsystems metrics
If you follow the steps in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/tree/master/polkadot/node/subsystem-bench#install-grafana
for installing locally prometheus and grafana, all real metrics for the
`approval-distribution`, `approval-voting` and overseer are available.
E.g:
<img width="2149" alt="Screenshot 2023-12-05 at 11 07 46"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/49718502/cb8ae2dd-178b-4922-bfa4-dc37e572ed38">

<img width="2551" alt="Screenshot 2023-12-05 at 11 09 42"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/49718502/8b4542ba-88b9-46f9-9b70-cc345366081b">

<img width="2154" alt="Screenshot 2023-12-05 at 11 10 15"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/49718502/b8874d8d-632e-443a-9840-14ad8e90c54f">

<img width="2535" alt="Screenshot 2023-12-05 at 11 10 52"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/49718502/779a439f-fd18-4985-bb80-85d5afad78e2">

### Profile with pyroscope
1. Setup pyroscope following the steps in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/tree/master/polkadot/node/subsystem-bench#install-pyroscope,
then run any of the benchmark scenario with `--profile` as the
arguments.
2. Open the pyroscope dashboard in grafana, e.g:
<img width="2544" alt="Screenshot 2024-01-09 at 17 09 58"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/49718502/58f50c99-a910-4d20-951a-8b16639303d9">



### Useful  logs
1. Network bandwidth requirements:
```
Payload bytes received from peers: 503993 KiB total, 50399 KiB/block
Payload bytes sent to peers: 629971 KiB total, 62997 KiB/block
```

2. Cpu usage by the approval-distribution/approval-voting subsystems.
```
approval-distribution CPU usage 84.061s
approval-distribution CPU usage per block 8.406s
approval-voting CPU usage 96.532s
approval-voting CPU usage per block 9.653s
```

3. Time passed until a given block is approved
```
 Chain selection approved  after 3500 ms hash=0x0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
Chain selection approved  after 4500 ms hash=0x0202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202
```

### Using benchmark to quantify improvements from
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1178 +
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1191

Using a versi-node we compare the scenarios where all new optimisations
are disabled with a scenarios where tranche0 assignments are sent in a
single message and a conservative simulation where the coalescing of
approvals gives us just 50% reduction in the number of messages we send.

Overall, what we see is a speedup of around 30-40% in the time it takes
to process the necessary messages and a 30-40% reduction in the
necessary bandwidth.

#### Best case scenario comparison(minimum required tranches sent).
Unoptimised
```
    Number of blocks: 10
    Payload bytes received from peers: 53289 KiB total, 5328 KiB/block
    Payload bytes sent to peers: 52489 KiB total, 5248 KiB/block
    approval-distribution CPU usage 6.732s
    approval-distribution CPU usage per block 0.673s
    approval-voting CPU usage 9.523s
    approval-voting CPU usage per block 0.952s
```

vs Optimisation enabled
```
   Number of blocks: 10
   Payload bytes received from peers: 32141 KiB total, 3214 KiB/block
   Payload bytes sent to peers: 37314 KiB total, 3731 KiB/block
   approval-distribution CPU usage 4.658s
   approval-distribution CPU usage per block 0.466s
   approval-voting CPU usage 6.236s
   approval-voting CPU usage per block 0.624s
```

#### Worst case all tranches sent, very unlikely happens when sharding
breaks.

Unoptimised
```
   Number of blocks: 10
   Payload bytes received from peers: 746393 KiB total, 74639 KiB/block
   Payload bytes sent to peers: 729151 KiB total, 72915 KiB/block
   approval-distribution CPU usage 118.681s
   approval-distribution CPU usage per block 11.868s
   approval-voting CPU usage 124.118s
   approval-voting CPU usage per block 12.412s
```

vs optimised
```
    Number of blocks: 10
    Payload bytes received from peers: 503993 KiB total, 50399 KiB/block
    Payload bytes sent to peers: 629971 KiB total, 62997 KiB/block
    approval-distribution CPU usage 84.061s
    approval-distribution CPU usage per block 8.406s
    approval-voting CPU usage 96.532s
    approval-voting CPU usage per block 9.653s
```


## TODOs
[x] Polish implementation.
[x] Use what we have so far to evaluate
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1191

 before merging.
[x] List of features and additional dimensions we want to use for
benchmarking.
[x] Run benchmark on hardware similar with versi and kusama nodes.
[ ] Add benchmark to be run in CI for catching regression in
performance.
[ ] Rebase on latest changes for network emulation.

---------

Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
      f9f88688
  15. Feb 02, 2024
  17. Jan 31, 2024
    • Oliver Tale-Yazdi's avatar
      [FRAME] Make `core-fellowship` ans `salary` work for swapped members (#3156) · 07e55006
      Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored 
      Fixup for https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2587 to make
the `core-fellowship` crate work with swapped members.

Adds a `MemberSwappedHandler` to the `ranked-collective` pallet that are
implemented by `core-fellowship+salary`.
There is are exhaustive tests
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/72aa7ac17a0e5b16faab5d2992aa2db2e01b05d0/substrate/frame/core-fellowship/src/tests/integration.rs#L338)
and
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/ab3cdb05a5ebc1ff841f8dda67edef0ea40bbba5/substrate/frame/salary/src/tests/integration.rs#L224

)
to check that adding member `1` is equivalent to adding member `0` and
then swapping.

---------

Signed-off-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      07e55006
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      [xcm] Fix `SovereignPaidRemoteExporter` and `DepositAsset` handling (#3157) · 6ea472ad
      Branislav Kontur authored 
      This PR addresses two issues:
- It modifies `DepositAsset`'s asset filter from `All` to
`AllCounted(1)` to prevent potentially charging excessive weight/fees.
This adjustment avoids situations where fees could be calculated based
on the count of assets, as illustrated
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/cumulus/parachains/runtimes/bridge-hubs/bridge-hub-rococo/src/weights/xcm/mod.rs#L38-L46).
- It encapsulates `DepositAsset` with `SetAppendix` to ensure that
`fees` are not trapped in any case. For instance, this prevents issues
when `ExportXcm::validate` encounters an error during the processing of
`ExportMessage`.
      6ea472ad
    • dependabot[bot]'s avatar
      Bump bounded-collections from 0.1.9 to 0.2.0 (#3118) · 2adf499a
      dependabot[bot] authored 
      Bumps [bounded-collections](https://github.com/paritytech/parity-common)
from 0.1.9 to 0.2.0.
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/paritytech/parity-common/commits/impl-rlp-v0.2.0">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />


[![Dependabot compatibility
score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency-name=bounded-collections&package-manager=cargo&previous-version=0.1.9&new-version=0.2.0)](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores

)

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.

[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)

---

<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore <dependency name> major version` will close this
group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific
dependency's major version (unless you unignore this specific
dependency's major version or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore <dependency name> minor version` will close this
group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific
dependency's minor version (unless you unignore this specific
dependency's minor version or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore <dependency name>` will close this group update PR
and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency
(unless you unignore this specific dependency or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot unignore <dependency name>` will remove all of the ignore
conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot unignore <dependency name> <ignore condition>` will
remove the ignore condition of the specified dependency and ignore
conditions


</details>

Signed-off-by: default avatardependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatardependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: default avatarLiam Aharon <[email protected]>
      2adf499a
    • Alexandru Gheorghe's avatar
      Fail early at obviously invalid approvals (#3152) · 261f4b71
      Alexandru Gheorghe authored 
      

Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
      261f4b71
    • Adrian Catangiu's avatar
      xcm-executor: DepositReserveAsset charges delivery fees from inner assets (#3142) · 5354097a
      Adrian Catangiu authored 
      

This fix aims to solve an issue in Kusama that resulted in failed
reserve asset transfers.

During multi-hop XCMs, like reserve asset transfers where the reserve is
not the sender nor the destination, but a third remote chain, the origin
is not available to pay for delivery fees out of their account directly,
so delivery fees should be paid out of transferred assets.

This commit also adds an xcm-emulator regression test that validates
this scenario is now working.

Signed-off-by: default avatarAdrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
      5354097a
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      [frame] `#[pallet::composite_enum]` improved variant count handling + removed... · bb8ddc46
      Branislav Kontur authored 
      [frame] `#[pallet::composite_enum]` improved variant count handling + removed `pallet_balances`'s `MaxHolds` config (#2657)

I started this investigation/issue based on @liamaharon question
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1801#discussion_r1410452499).

## Problem

The `pallet_balances` integrity test should correctly detect that the
runtime has correct distinct `HoldReasons` variant count. I assume the
same situation exists for RuntimeFreezeReason.

It is not a critical problem, if we set `MaxHolds` with a sufficiently
large value, everything should be ok. However, in this case, the
integrity_test check becomes less useful.

**Situation for "any" runtime:**
- `HoldReason` enums from different pallets:
```rust
        /// from pallet_nis
        #[pallet::composite_enum]
	pub enum HoldReason {
		NftReceipt,
	}

        /// from pallet_preimage
        #[pallet::composite_enum]
	pub enum HoldReason {
		Preimage,
	}

        // from pallet_state-trie-migration
        #[pallet::composite_enum]
	pub enum HoldReason {
		SlashForContinueMigrate,
		SlashForMigrateCustomTop,
		SlashForMigrateCustomChild,
	}
```

- generated `RuntimeHoldReason` enum looks like:
```rust
pub enum RuntimeHoldReason {

    #[codec(index = 32u8)]
    Preimage(pallet_preimage::HoldReason),

    #[codec(index = 38u8)]
    Nis(pallet_nis::HoldReason),

    #[codec(index = 42u8)]
    StateTrieMigration(pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason),
}
```

- composite enum `RuntimeHoldReason` variant count is detected as `3`
- we set `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>`
- `pallet_balances::integrity_test` is ok with `3`(at least 3)

However, the real problem can occur in a live runtime where some
functionality might stop working. This is due to a total of 5 distinct
hold reasons (for pallets with multi-instance support, it is even more),
and not all of them can be used because of an incorrect `MaxHolds`,
which is deemed acceptable according to the `integrity_test`:
  ```
  // pseudo-code - if we try to call all of these:

T::Currency::hold(&pallet_nis::HoldReason::NftReceipt.into(),
&nft_owner, deposit)?;
T::Currency::hold(&pallet_preimage::HoldReason::Preimage.into(),
&nft_owner, deposit)?;

T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForContinueMigrate.into(),
&nft_owner, deposit)?;

  // With `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>` these two will fail

T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomTop.into(),
&nft_owner, deposit)?;

T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomChild.into(),
&nft_owner, deposit)?;
  ```  


## Solutions

A macro `#[pallet::*]` expansion is extended of `VariantCount`
implementation for the `#[pallet::composite_enum]` enum type. This
expansion generates the `VariantCount` implementation for pallets'
`HoldReason`, `FreezeReason`, `LockId`, and `SlashReason`. Enum variants
must be plain enum values without fields to ensure a deterministic
count.

The composite runtime enum, `RuntimeHoldReason` and
`RuntimeFreezeReason`, now sets `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT` as the sum
of pallets' enum `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT`:
```rust
#[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)]
mod module_single_instance {

	#[pallet::composite_enum]
	pub enum HoldReason {
		ModuleSingleInstanceReason1,
		ModuleSingleInstanceReason2,
	}
...
}

#[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)]
mod module_multi_instance {

	#[pallet::composite_enum]
	pub enum HoldReason<I: 'static = ()> {
		ModuleMultiInstanceReason1,
		ModuleMultiInstanceReason2,
		ModuleMultiInstanceReason3,
	}
...
}


impl self::sp_api_hidden_includes_construct_runtime::hidden_include::traits::VariantCount
    for RuntimeHoldReason
{
    const VARIANT_COUNT: u32 = 0
        + module_single_instance::HoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT
        + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance1>::VARIANT_COUNT
        + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance2>::VARIANT_COUNT
        + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance3>::VARIANT_COUNT;
}
```

In addition, `MaxHolds` is removed (as suggested
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2657#discussion_r1443324573))
from `pallet_balances`, and its `Holds` are now bounded to
`RuntimeHoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT`. Therefore, there is no need to let
the runtime specify `MaxHolds`.


## For reviewers

Relevant changes can be found here:
- `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/lib.rs` 
-  `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/parse/composite.rs`
-  `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/expand/composite.rs`
-
`substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/composite_helper.rs`
-
`substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/hold_reason.rs`
-
`substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/freeze_reason.rs`
- `substrate/frame/support/src/traits/misc.rs`

And the rest of the files is just about removed `MaxHolds` from
`pallet_balances`

## Next steps

Do the same for `MaxFreezes`
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2997

.

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarDónal Murray <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatargupnik <[email protected]>
      bb8ddc46
    • Francisco Aguirre's avatar
      Add limits to XCMv4 (#3114) · cc4805b5
      Francisco Aguirre authored 
      

Some more work regarding XCMv4. Two limits from v3 were not transferred
over, those are:
- The instructions limit
- The number of assets limit
Both of these are now in v4.

For some reason `AssetInstance` increased in size, don't know why CI
didn't catch that before.

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      cc4805b5
  19. Jan 30, 2024
  21. Jan 29, 2024