- Mar 14, 2025
-
-
Matteo Muraca authored
-
- Mar 13, 2025
-
-
Matteo Muraca authored
-
Matteo Muraca authored
-
- Mar 10, 2025
-
-
jpserrat authored
Closes #6851 This PR adds an `EventEmitter` trait to the XCM Executor configuration, enabling event emission for XCM handling. The implementation introduces three dedicated functions to emit relevant events: - `emit_sent_event`: Emits a `Sent` event when an XCM is successfully sent. - `emit_send_failure_event`: Emits a `SendFailed` event when an XCM fails to send. - `emit_process_failure_event`: Emits a `ProcessXcmError` event when an XCM fails during processing. Kusama address: FkB6QEo8VnV3oifugNj5NeVG3Mvq1zFbrUu4P5YwRoe5mQN --------- Co-authored-by:
Raymond Cheung <178801527+raymondkfcheung@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
cmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
-
- Feb 24, 2025
-
-
Daniel Shiposha authored
# Description Fixes #7413 ## Integration This PR updates the `DryRunApi`. The signature of the `dry_run_call` is changed, and the XCM version of the return values of `dry_run_xcm` now follows the version of the input XCM program. ## Review Notes * **The `DryRunApi` is modified** * **Added the `Router::clear_messages` to `dry_run_xcm` common implementation** * **Fixed the xcmp-queue's Router's clear_messages: channels details' first_index and last_index are reset when clearing** * **The MIN_XCM_VERSION is added** * The common implementation in the `pallet-xcm` is modified accordingly * The `DryRunApi` tests are modified to account for testing old XCM versions * The implementation from the `pallet-xcm` is used where it was not used (including the `DryRunApi` tests) * All the runtime implementations are modified according to the Runtime API change --------- Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
-
- Feb 19, 2025
-
-
Serban Iorga authored
Just deriving `DecodeWithMemTracking` for the types used by the bridge, snowbridge and xcm pallets
-
- Feb 17, 2025
-
-
Pablo Andrés Dorado Suárez authored
Closes #4315 --------- Co-authored-by:
Guillaume Thiolliere <guillaume.thiolliere@parity.io>
-
- Jan 23, 2025
-
-
runcomet authored
# Derived Dev Accounts Resolves https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/6040 ## Description This update introduces support for creating an arbitrary number of developer accounts at the genesis block based on a specified derivation path. This functionality is gated by the runtime-benchmarks feature, ensuring it is only enabled during benchmarking scenarios. ### Key Features - Arbitrary Dev Accounts at Genesis: Developers can now specify any number of accounts to be generated at genesis using a hard derivation path. - Default Derivation Path: If no derivation path is provided (i.e., when `Option<dev_accounts: (..., None)>` is set to `Some` at genesis), the system will default to the path `//Sender//{}`. - No Impact on Total Token Issuance: Developer accounts are excluded from the total issuance of the token supply at genesis, ensuring they do not affect the overall balance or token distribution. polkadot address: 14SRqZTC1d8rfxL8W1tBTnfUBPU23ACFVPzp61FyGf4ftUFg --------- Co-authored-by:
Sebastian Kunert <skunert49@gmail.com>
-
- Dec 20, 2024
-
-
Xavier Lau authored
It doesn't make sense to only reorder the features array. For example: This makes it hard for me to compare the dependencies and features, especially some crates have a really really long dependencies list. ```toml [dependencies] c = "*" a = "*" b = "*" [features] std = [ "a", "b", "c", ] ``` This makes my life easier. ```toml [dependencies] a = "*" b = "*" c = "*" [features] std = [ "a", "b", "c", ] ``` --------- Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Dec 18, 2024
-
-
clangenb authored
Migrates pallet-xcm benchmarks to benchmark v2 syntax * Part of #6202
-
- Dec 12, 2024
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Dec 03, 2024
-
-
Lulu authored
-
- Nov 25, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
-
- Nov 11, 2024
-
-
jpserrat authored
Closes #2082 change send xcm to use `xcm::executor::FeeManager` to determine if the sender should be charged. I had to change the `FeeManager` of the penpal config to ensure the same test behaviour as before. For the other tests, I'm using the `FeeManager` from the `xcm::executor::FeeManager` as this one is used to check if the fee can be waived on the charge fees method. --------- Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com>
-
- Nov 06, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
# Context This PR aims to introduce XCMv5, for now it's in progress and will be updated over time. This branch will serve as a milestone branch for merging in all features we want to add to XCM, roughly outlined [here](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/xcm-format/issues/60). More features could be added. ## TODO - [x] Migrate foreign assets from v3 to v4 - [x] Setup v5 skeleton - [x] Remove XCMv2 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5390 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5585 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5420 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5876 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5971 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/6148 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/6228 Fixes #3434 Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4190 Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/5209 Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/5241 Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4284 --------- Signed-off-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Andrii <ndk@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Joseph Zhao <65984904+programskillforverification@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
Nazar Mokrynskyi <nazar@mokrynskyi.com> Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by:
Shawn Tabrizi <shawntabrizi@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by:
Serban Iorga <serban@parity.io>
-
- Oct 25, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
Relates to: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/4826 Relates to: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3214 ## Description `pallet-xcm` stores some operational data that uses `Versioned*` XCM types. When we add a new XCM version (XV), we deprecate XV-2 and remove XV-3. Without proper migration, this can lead to issues with [undecodable storage](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/actions/runs/11381324568/job/31662577532?pr=6092), as was identified on the XCMv5 branch where XCMv2 was removed. This PR extends the existing `MigrateToLatestXcmVersion` to include migration for the `Queries`, `LockedFungibles`, and `RemoteLockedFungibles` storage types. Additionally, more checks were added to `try_state` for these types. ## TODO - [x] create tracking issue for `polkadot-fellows` https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/issues/492 - [x] Add missing `MigrateToLatestXcmVersion` for westend - [x] fix pallet-xcm `Queries` - fails for Westend https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/actions/runs/11381324568/job/31662577532?pr=6092 - `V2` was removed from `Versioned*` stuff, but we have a live data with V2 e.g. Queries - e.g. Kusama or Polkadot relay chains ``` VersionNotifier: { origin: { V2: { parents: 0 interior: { X1: { Parachain: 2,124 } } } } isActive: true } ```  - [x] fix also for `RemoteLockedFungibles` - [x] fix also for `LockedFungibles` ## Follow-ups - [ ] deploy on Westend chains before XCMv5 - [ ] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/6188 --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by:
Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
-
- Oct 18, 2024
-
-
georgepisaltu authored
Original PR https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2280 reverted in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3665 This PR reintroduces the reverted functionality with additional changes, related effort [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3623). Description is copied over from the original PR First part of [Extrinsic Horizon](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2415) Introduces a new trait `TransactionExtension` to replace `SignedExtension`. Introduce the idea of transactions which obey the runtime's extensions and have according Extension data (né Extra data) yet do not have hard-coded signatures. Deprecate the terminology of "Unsigned" when used for transactions/extrinsics owing to there now being "proper" unsigned transactions which obey the extension framework and "old-style" unsigned which do not. Instead we have __*General*__ for the former and __*Bare*__ for the latter. (Ultimately, the latter will be phased out as a type of transaction, and Bare will only be used for Inherents.) Types of extrinsic are now therefore: - Bare (no hardcoded signature, no Extra data; used to be known as "Unsigned") - Bare transactions (deprecated): Gossiped, validated with `ValidateUnsigned` (deprecated) and the `_bare_compat` bits of `TransactionExtension` (deprecated). - Inherents: Not gossiped, validated with `ProvideInherent`. - Extended (Extra data): Gossiped, validated via `TransactionExtension`. - Signed transactions (with a hardcoded signature) in extrinsic v4. - General transactions (without a hardcoded signature) in extrinsic v5. `TransactionExtension` differs from `SignedExtension` because: - A signature on the underlying transaction may validly not be present. - It may alter the origin during validation. - `pre_dispatch` is renamed to `prepare` and need not contain the checks present in `validate`. - `validate` and `prepare` is passed an `Origin` rather than a `AccountId`. - `validate` may pass arbitrary information into `prepare` via a new user-specifiable type `Val`. - `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to `Implicit`/`implicit`. It is encoded *for the entire transaction* and passed in to each extension as a new argument to `validate`. This facilitates the ability of extensions to acts as underlying crypto. There is a new `DispatchTransaction` trait which contains only default function impls and is impl'ed for any `TransactionExtension` impler. It provides several utility functions which reduce some of the tedium from using `TransactionExtension` (indeed, none of its regular functions should now need to be called directly). Three transaction version discriminator ("versions") are now permissible (RFC [here](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/RFCs/pull/84)) in extrinsic version 5: - 0b00000100 or 0b00000101: Bare (used to be called "Unsigned"): contains Signature or Extra (extension data). After bare transactions are no longer supported, this will strictly identify an Inherents only. Available in both extrinsic versions 4 and 5. - 0b10000100: Old-school "Signed" Transaction: contains Signature, Extra (extension data) and an extension version byte, introduced as part of [RFC99](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/RFCs/blob/main/text/0099-transaction-extension-version.md). Still available as part of extrinsic v4. - 0b01000101: New-school "General" Transaction: contains Extra (extension data) and an extension version byte, as per RFC99, but no Signature. Only available in extrinsic v5. For the New-school General Transaction, it becomes trivial for authors to publish extensions to the mechanism for authorizing an Origin, e.g. through new kinds of key-signing schemes, ZK proofs, pallet state, mutations over pre-authenticated origins or any combination of the above. `UncheckedExtrinsic` still maintains encode/decode backwards compatibility with extrinsic version 4, where the first byte was encoded as: - 0b00000100 - Unsigned transactions - 0b10000100 - Old-school Signed transactions, without the extension version byte Now, `UncheckedExtrinsic` contains a `Preamble` and the actual call. The `Preamble` describes the type of extrinsic as follows: ```rust /// A "header" for extrinsics leading up to the call itself. Determines the type of extrinsic and /// holds any necessary specialized data. #[derive(Eq, PartialEq, Clone)] pub enum Preamble<Address, Signature, Extension> { /// An extrinsic without a signature or any extension. This means it's either an inherent or /// an old-school "Unsigned" (we don't use that terminology any more since it's confusable with /// the general transaction which is without a signature but does have an extension). /// /// NOTE: In the future, once we remove `ValidateUnsigned`, this will only serve Inherent /// extrinsics and thus can be renamed to `Inherent`. Bare(ExtrinsicVersion), /// An old-school transaction extrinsic which includes a signature of some hard-coded crypto. /// Available only on extrinsic version 4. Signed(Address, Signature, ExtensionVersion, Extension), /// A new-school transaction extrinsic which does not include a signature by default. The /// origin authorization, through signatures or other means, is performed by the transaction /// extension in this extrinsic. Available starting with extrinsic version 5. General(ExtensionVersion, Extension), } ``` ## Code Migration ### NOW: Getting it to build Wrap your `SignedExtension`s in `AsTransactionExtension`. This should be accompanied by renaming your aggregate type in line with the new terminology. E.g. Before: ```rust /// The SignedExtension to the basic transaction logic. pub type SignedExtra = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension, ); /// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime. pub type UncheckedExtrinsic = generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, SignedExtra>; ``` After: ```rust /// The extension to the basic transaction logic. pub type TxExtension = ( /* snip */ AsTransactionExtension<MySpecialSignedExtension>, ); /// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime. pub type UncheckedExtrinsic = generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, TxExtension>; ``` You'll also need to alter any transaction building logic to add a `.into()` to make the conversion happen. E.g. Before: ```rust fn construct_extrinsic( /* snip */ ) -> UncheckedExtrinsic { let extra: SignedExtra = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */), ); let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), extra.clone()).unwrap(); let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e)); UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed( /* snip */ Signature::Sr25519(signature), extra, ) } ``` After: ```rust fn construct_extrinsic( /* snip */ ) -> UncheckedExtrinsic { let tx_ext: TxExtension = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */).into(), ); let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), tx_ext.clone()).unwrap(); let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e)); UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed( /* snip */ Signature::Sr25519(signature), tx_ext, ) } ``` ### SOON: Migrating to `TransactionExtension` Most `SignedExtension`s can be trivially converted to become a `TransactionExtension`. There are a few things to know. - Instead of a single trait like `SignedExtension`, you should now implement two traits individually: `TransactionExtensionBase` and `TransactionExtension`. - Weights are now a thing and must be provided via the new function `fn weight`. #### `TransactionExtensionBase` This trait takes care of anything which is not dependent on types specific to your runtime, most notably `Call`. - `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to `Implicit`/`implicit`. - Weight must be returned by implementing the `weight` function. If your extension is associated with a pallet, you'll probably want to do this via the pallet's existing benchmarking infrastructure. #### `TransactionExtension` Generally: - `pre_dispatch` is now `prepare` and you *should not reexecute the `validate` functionality in there*! - You don't get an account ID any more; you get an origin instead. If you need to presume an account ID, then you can use the trait function `AsSystemOriginSigner::as_system_origin_signer`. - You get an additional ticket, similar to `Pre`, called `Val`. This defines data which is passed from `validate` into `prepare`. This is important since you should not be duplicating logic from `validate` to `prepare`, you need a way of passing your working from the former into the latter. This is it. - This trait takes a `Call` type parameter. `Call` is the runtime call type which used to be an associated type; you can just move it to become a type parameter for your trait impl. - There's no `AccountId` associated type any more. Just remove it. Regarding `validate`: - You get three new parameters in `validate`; all can be ignored when migrating from `SignedExtension`. - `validate` returns a tuple on success; the second item in the tuple is the new ticket type `Self::Val` which gets passed in to `prepare`. If you use any information extracted during `validate` (off-chain and on-chain, non-mutating) in `prepare` (on-chain, mutating) then you can pass it through with this. For the tuple's last item, just return the `origin` argument. Regarding `prepare`: - This is renamed from `pre_dispatch`, but there is one change: - FUNCTIONALITY TO VALIDATE THE TRANSACTION NEED NOT BE DUPLICATED FROM `validate`!! - (This is different to `SignedExtension` which was required to run the same checks in `pre_dispatch` as in `validate`.) Regarding `post_dispatch`: - Since there are no unsigned transactions handled by `TransactionExtension`, `Pre` is always defined, so the first parameter is `Self::Pre` rather than `Option<Self::Pre>`. If you make use of `SignedExtension::validate_unsigned` or `SignedExtension::pre_dispatch_unsigned`, then: - Just use the regular versions of these functions instead. - Have your logic execute in the case that the `origin` is `None`. - Ensure your transaction creation logic creates a General Transaction rather than a Bare Transaction; this means having to include all `TransactionExtension`s' data. - `ValidateUnsigned` can still be used (for now) if you need to be able to construct transactions which contain none of the extension data, however these will be phased out in stage 2 of the Transactions Horizon, so you should consider moving to an extension-centric design. --------- Signed-off-by:
georgepisaltu <george.pisaltu@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Guillaume Thiolliere <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
-
- Oct 17, 2024
-
-
Andrii authored
Implemented is_trusted_reserve and is_trusted_teleporter API methods. Tested them with regular and chopstick tests. Fixes #97 --------- Co-authored-by:
Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
-
- Oct 15, 2024
-
-
Ayevbeosa Iyamu authored
Added error logs in pallet-xcm to help in debugging, fixes #2408 ## TODO - [x] change `log::error` to `tracing::error` format for `xcm-executor` - [x] check existing logs, e.g. this one can be extended with more info `tracing::error!(target: "xcm::reanchor", ?error, "Failed reanchoring with error");` - [x] use `tracing` instead of `log` for `pallet-xcm/src/lib.rs` --------- Co-authored-by:
Ayevbeosa Iyamu <aiyamu@vatebra.com> Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
-
- Sep 25, 2024
-
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
This change adds the required validation for stronger UX guarantees when using `InitiateReserveWithdraw` or `InitiateTeleport` XCM instructions. Execution of the instructions will fail if the local chain is not configured to trust the "destination" or "reserve" chain as a reserve/trusted-teleporter for the provided "assets". With this change, misuse of `InitiateReserveWithdraw`/`InitiateTeleport` fails on origin with no overall side-effects, rather than failing on destination (with side-effects to origin's assets issuance). The commit also makes the same validations for pallet-xcm transfers, and adds regression tests. --------- Signed-off-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
-
- Sep 05, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
The dry-run shows in `forwarded_xcms` all the messages in the queues at the time of calling the API. Each time the API is called, the result could be different. You could get messages even if you dry-run something that doesn't send a message, like a `System::remark`. This PR fixes this by clearing the message queues before doing the dry-run, so the only messages left are the ones the users of the API actually care about. --------- Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
-
- Jul 19, 2024
-
-
Özgün Özerk authored
Fixes #4960 Configuring `FeeManager` enforces the boundary `Into<[u8; 32]>` for the `AccountId` type. Here is how it works currently: Configuration: ```rust type FeeManager = XcmFeeManagerFromComponents< IsChildSystemParachain<primitives::Id>, XcmFeeToAccount<Self::AssetTransactor, AccountId, TreasuryAccount>, >; ``` `XcmToFeeAccount` struct: ```rust /// A `HandleFee` implementation that simply deposits the fees into a specific on-chain /// `ReceiverAccount`. /// /// It reuses the `AssetTransactor` configured on the XCM executor to deposit fee assets. If /// the `AssetTransactor` returns an error while calling `deposit_asset`, then a warning will be /// logged and the fee burned. pub struct XcmFeeToAccount<AssetTransactor, AccountId, ReceiverAccount>( PhantomData<(AssetTransactor, AccountId, ReceiverAccount)>, ); impl< AssetTransactor: TransactAsset, AccountId: Clone + Into<[u8; 32]>, ReceiverAccount: Get<Acco...
-
- Jul 15, 2024
-
-
Jun Jiang authored
This should remove nearly all usage of `sp-std` except: - bridge and bridge-hubs - a few of frames re-export `sp-std`, keep them for now - there is a usage of `sp_std::Writer`, I don't have an idea how to move it Please review proc-macro carefully. I'm not sure I'm doing it the right way. Note: need `/bot fmt` --------- Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Jun 26, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4298 This PR also merges `xcm-fee-payment-runtime-api` module to the `xcm-runtime-api`. ## TODO - [x] rename `convert` to `convert_location` and add new one `convert_account` (opposite direction) - [x] add to the all testnet runtimes - [x] check polkadot-js if supports that automatically or if needs to be added manually https://github.com/polkadot-js/api/pull/5917 - [ ] backport/patch for fellows and release (asap) ## Open questions - [x] should we merge `xcm-runtime-api` and `xcm-fee-payment-runtime-api` to the one module `xcm-runtime-api` ? ## Usage Input: - `location: VersionedLocation` Output: - account_id bytes  --------- Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
-
- Jun 24, 2024
-
-
dashangcun authored
Signed-off-by:
dashangcun <jchaodaohang@foxmail.com> Co-authored-by:
dashangcun <jchaodaohang@foxmail.com>
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
After preparing in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/4633, we can lift also all internal dependencies up to the workspace. This does not actually change anything, but uses `workspace = true` for all dependencies. You can check it with: ```bash git checkout -q $(git merge-base oty-lift-all-deps origin/master) cargo tree -e features > master.out git checkout -q oty-lift-all-deps cargo tree -e features > new.out diff master.out new.out ``` It did not yet lift 100% of dependencies, some inside of `target.*` or some that had conflicting aliases introduced recently. But i will do these together in a follow-up with CI checks. Can be reproduced with [zepter](https://github.com/ggwpez/zepter/): `zepter transpose d lift-to-workspace "regex:.*" --version-resolver highest --skip-package "polkadot-sdk" --ignore-errors --fix`. --------- Signed-off-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
-
- Jun 13, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
This PR aligns the settings for `MaxFreezes`, `RuntimeFreezeReason`, and `FreezeIdentifier`. #### Future work and improvements https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2997 (remove `MaxFreezes` and `FreezeIdentifier`)
-
- May 31, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
Depends on https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/4621. Implemented the [`XcmPaymentApi`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3607) and [`DryRunApi`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3872) on all system parachains. More scenarios can be tested on both rococo and westend if all system parachains implement this APIs. The objective is for all XCM-enabled runtimes to implement them. After demonstrating fee estimation in a UI on the testnets, come the fellowship runtimes. Step towards https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/690.
-
- May 29, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
Follow-up to the new `XcmDryRunApi` runtime API introduced in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3872. Taking an extrinsic means the frontend has to sign first to dry-run and once again to submit. This is bad UX which is solved by taking an `origin` and a `call`. This also has the benefit of being able to dry-run as any account, since it needs no signature. This is a breaking change since I changed `dry_run_extrinsic` to `dry_run_call`, however, this API is still only on testnets. The crates are bumped accordingly. As a part of this PR, I changed the name of the API from `XcmDryRunApi` to just `DryRunApi`, since it can be used for general dry-running :) Step towards https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/690. Example of calling the API with PAPI, not the best code, just testing :) ```ts // We just build a call, the arguments make it look very big though. const call = localApi.tx.XcmPallet.transfer_assets({ dest: XcmVersionedLocation.V4({ parents: 0, interior: XcmV4Junctions.X1(XcmV4Junction.Parachain(1000)) }), beneficiary: XcmVersionedLocation.V4({ parents: 0, interior: XcmV4Junctions.X1(XcmV4Junction.AccountId32({ network: undefined, id: Binary.fromBytes(encodeAccount(account.address)) })) }), weight_limit: XcmV3WeightLimit.Unlimited(), assets: XcmVersionedAssets.V4([{ id: { parents: 0, interior: XcmV4Junctions.Here() }, fun: XcmV3MultiassetFungibility.Fungible(1_000_000_000_000n) } ]), fee_asset_item: 0, }); // We call the API passing in a signed origin const result = await localApi.apis.XcmDryRunApi.dry_run_call( WestendRuntimeOriginCaller.system(DispatchRawOrigin.Signed(account.address)), call.decodedCall ); if (result.success && result.value.execution_result.success) { // We find the forwarded XCM we want. The first one going to AssetHub in this case. const xcmsToAssetHub = result.value.forwarded_xcms.find(([location, _]) => ( location.type === "V4" && location.value.parents === 0 && location.value.interior.type === "X1" && location.value.interior.value.type === "Parachain" && location.value.interior.value.value === 1000 ))!; // We can even find the delivery fees for that forwarded XCM. const deliveryFeesQuery = await localApi.apis.XcmPaymentApi.query_delivery_fees(xcmsToAssetHub[0], xcmsToAssetHub[1][0]); if (deliveryFeesQuery.success) { const amount = deliveryFeesQuery.value.type === "V4" && deliveryFeesQuery.value.value[0].fun.type === "Fungible" && deliveryFeesQuery.value.value[0].fun.value.valueOf() || 0n; // We store them in state somewhere. setDeliveryFees(formatAmount(BigInt(amount))); } } ``` --------- Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
-
- May 27, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
Marked XCMv2 as deprecated now that we have XCMv4. It will be removed sometime around June 2024. --------- Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
-
- May 24, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
Attempt to avoid specifying `BlockHashCount` for different `mocking::{MockBlock, MockBlockU32, MockBlockU128}` (#4543) While doing some migration/rebase I came in to the situation, where I needed to change `mocking::MockBlock` to `mocking::MockBlockU32`: ``` #[derive_impl(frame_system::config_preludes::TestDefaultConfig)] impl frame_system::Config for TestRuntime { type Block = frame_system::mocking::MockBlockU32<TestRuntime>; type AccountData = pallet_balances::AccountData<ThisChainBalance>; } ``` But actual `TestDefaultConfig` for `frame_system` is using `ConstU64` for `type BlockHashCount = frame_support::traits::ConstU64<10>;` [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/substrate/frame/system/src/lib.rs#L303). Because of this, it force me to specify and add override for `type BlockHashCount = ConstU32<10>`. This PR tries to fix this with `TestBlockHashCount` implementation for `TestDefaultConfig` which supports `u32`, `u64` and `u128` as a `BlockNumber`. ### How to simulate error Just by removing `type BlockHashCount = ConstU32<250>;` [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/substrate/frame/multisig/src/tests.rs#L44) ``` :~/parity/olkadot-sdk$ cargo test -p pallet-multisig Compiling pallet-multisig v28.0.0 (/home/bparity/parity/aaa/polkadot-sdk/substrate/frame/multisig) error[E0277]: the trait bound `ConstU64<10>: frame_support::traits::Get<u32>` is not satisfied --> substrate/frame/multisig/src/tests.rs:41:1 | 41 | #[derive_impl(frame_system::config_preludes::TestDefaultConfig)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `frame_support::traits::Get<u32>` is not implemented for `ConstU64<10>` | = help: the following other types implement trait `frame_support::traits::Get<T>`: <ConstU64<T> as frame_support::traits::Get<u64>> <ConstU64<T> as frame_support::traits::Get<std::option::Option<u64>>> note: required by a bound in `frame_system::Config::BlockHashCount` --> /home/bparity/parity/aaa/polkadot-sdk/substrate/frame/system/src/lib.rs:535:24 | 535 | type BlockHashCount: Get<BlockNumberFor<Self>>; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `Config::BlockHashCount` = note: this error originates in the attribute macro `derive_impl` which comes from the expansion of the macro `frame_support::macro_magic::forward_tokens_verbatim` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0277`. error: could not compile `pallet-multisig` (lib test) due to 1 previous error ``` ## For reviewers: (If there is a better solution, please let me know!) The first commit contains actual attempt to fix the problem: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/commit/3c5499e5 . The second commit is just removal of `BlockHashCount` from all other places where not needed by default. Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1657 --------- Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
-
- May 15, 2024
-
-
Alexandru Gheorghe authored
This bump of versions: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/4409/files#diff-13ee4b2252c9e516a0547f2891aa2105c3ca71c6d7a1e682c69be97998dfc87eR11936 reintroduced a dependency to proc-macro-crate 2.0.0 which is suffering from: https://github.com/bkchr/proc-macro-crate/pull/42 this, so bump parity-scale-codec to a newer version to eliminate the bad proc-macro-crate 2.0.0 dependency. --------- Signed-off-by:
Alexandru Gheorghe <alexandru.gheorghe@parity.io> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- May 08, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
# Context Estimating fees for XCM execution and sending has been an area with bad UX. The addition of the [XcmPaymentApi](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3607) exposed the necessary components to be able to estimate XCM fees correctly, however, that was not the full story. The `XcmPaymentApi` works for estimating fees only if you know the specific XCM you want to execute or send. This is necessary but most UIs want to estimate the fees for extrinsics, they don't necessarily know the XCM program that's executed by them. # Main addition A new runtime API is introduced, the `XcmDryRunApi`, that given an extrinsic, or an XCM program, returns its effects: - Execution result - Local XCM (in the case of an extrinsic) - Forwarded XCMs - List of events This API can be used on its own for dry-running purposes, for double-checking or testing, but it mainly shines when used in conjunction with the `XcmPaymentApi`. UIs can use these two APIs to estimate transfers. # How it works New tests are added to exemplify how to incorporate both APIs. There's a mock test just to make sure everything works under `xcm-fee-payment-runtime-api`. There's a real-world test using Westend and AssetHubWestend under `cumulus/parachains/integration-tests/emulated/tests/assets/asset-hub-westend/src/tests/xcm_fee_estimation.rs`. Added both a test for a simple teleport between chains and a reserve transfer asset between two parachains going through a reserve. The steps to follow: - Use `XcmDryRunApi::dry_run_extrinsic` to get local XCM program and forwarded messages - For each forwarded message - Use `XcmPaymentApi::query_delivery_fee` LOCALLY to get the delivery fees - Use `XcmPaymentApi::query_xcm_weight` ON THE DESTINATION to get the remote execution weight - (optional) Use `XcmPaymentApi::query_acceptable_payment_assets` ON THE DESTINATION to know on which assets the execution fees can be paid - Use `XcmPaymentApi::query_weight_to_asset_fee` ON THE DESTINATION to convert weight to the actual remote execution fees - Use `XcmDryRunApi::dry_run_xcm` ON THE DESTINATION to know if a new message will be forwarded, if so, continue # Dear reviewer The changes in this PR are grouped as follows, and in order of importance: - Addition of new runtime API - Definition, mock and simple tests: polkadot/xcm/xcm-fee-payment-runtime-api/* - Implemented on Westend, Asset Hub Westend and Penpal, will implement on every runtime in a following PR - Addition of a new config item to the XCM executor for recording xcms about to be executed - Definition: polkadot/xcm/xcm-executor/* - Implementation: polkadot/xcm/pallet-xcm/* - had to update all runtime xcm_config.rs files with `type XcmRecorder = XcmPallet;` - Addition of a new trait for inspecting the messages in queues - Definition: polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/routing.rs - Implemented it on all routers: - ChildParachainRouter: polkadot/runtime/common/src/xcm_sender.rs - ParentAsUmp: cumulus/primitives/utility/src/lib.rs (piggybacked on implementation in cumulus/pallets/parachain-system/src/lib.rs) - XcmpQueue: cumulus/pallets/xcmp-queue/src/lib.rs - Bridge: bridges/modules/xcm-bridge-hub-router/src/lib.rs - More complicated and useful tests: - cumulus/parachains/integration-tests/emulated/tests/assets/asset-hub-westend/src/tests/xcm_fee_estimation.rs ## Next steps With this PR, Westend, AssetHubWestend, Rococo and AssetHubRococo have the new API. UIs can test on these runtimes to create better experiences around cross-chain operations. Next: - Add XcmDryRunApi to all system parachains - Integrate xcm fee estimation in all emulated tests - Get this on the fellowship runtimes --------- Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
-
- Apr 29, 2024
-
-
Tin Chung authored
# ISSUE - Link to issue: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4237 # DESCRIPTION Remove all ModuleError with hard-coded indices to pallet Error. For example: ```rs Err(DispatchError::Module(ModuleError { index: 4, error: [2, 0, 0, 0], message: Some("Filtered") })) ``` To ```rs let expected_result = Err(crate::Error::<Test>::Filtered.into()); assert_eq!(result, expected_result); ``` # TEST OUTCOME ``` test result: ok. 74 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.02s ``` --------- Co-authored-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
-
- Apr 24, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
Revert "pallet-xcm: Deprecate `execute` and `send` in favor of `execute_blob` and `send_blob` (#3749)" This reverts commit feee773d . --------- Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Javier Bullrich <javier@bullrich.dev>
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
Change `transfer_assets_using_type()` to not assume `DepositAssets` as the intended use of the assets on the destination. Instead provides the caller with the ability to specify custom XCM that be executed on `dest` chain as the last step of the transfer, thus allowing custom usecases for the transferred assets. E.g. some are used/swapped/etc there, while some are sent further to yet another chain. Note: this is a follow-up on https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3695, bringing in an API change for `transfer_assets_using_type()`. This is ok as the previous version has not been yet released. Thus, its first release will include the new API proposed by this PR. This allows usecases such as: https://forum.polkadot.network/t/managing-sas-on-multiple-reserve-chains-for-same-asset/7538/4 BTW: all this pallet-xcm asset transfers code will be massively reduced once we have https://github.com/paritytech/xcm-format/pull/54 --------- Signed-off-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
-
- Apr 23, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
Ensure outbound XCMs are decodable with limits + add `EnsureDecodableXcm` router (for testing purposes) (#4186) This PR: - adds `EnsureDecodableXcm` (testing) router that attempts to *encode* and *decode* passed XCM `message` to ensure that the receiving side will be able to decode, at least with the same XCM version. - fixes `pallet_xcm` / `pallet_xcm_benchmarks` assets data generation Relates to investigation of https://substrate.stackexchange.com/questions/11288 and missing fix https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2129 which did not get into the fellows 1.1.X release. ## Questions/TODOs - [x] fix XCM benchmarks, which produces undecodable data - new router catched at least two cases - `BoundedVec exceeds its limit` - `Fungible asset of zero amount is not allowed` - [x] do we need to add `sort` to the `prepend_with` as we did for reanchor [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2129)? @serban300 (**created separate/follow-up PR**: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/4235) - [x] We added decoding check to `XcmpQueue` -> `validate_xcm_nesting`, why not to added to the `ParentAsUmp` or `ChildParachainRouter`? @franciscoaguirre (**created separate/follow-up PR**: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/4236) - [ ] `SendController::send_blob` replace `VersionedXcm::<()>::decode(` with `VersionedXcm::<()>::decode_with_depth_limit(MAX_XCM_DECODE_DEPTH, data)` ? --------- Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
-
- Apr 22, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
This PR: - sanitizes all `UniversalLocation`s with `GlobalConsensus` (when possible) - addressing [comment](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/4025#discussion_r1557361473) - adds `DefaultConfig` for `pallet-xcm-benchmarks` for `system`
-
- Apr 18, 2024
-
-
Tin Chung authored
# Description - Link to issue: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3651 polkadot address: 19nSqFQorfF2HxD3oBzWM3oCh4SaCRKWt1yvmgaPYGCo71J
-
- Apr 17, 2024
-
-
Sergej Sakac authored
This PR introduces changes enabling the transfer of coretime regions via XCM. TL;DR: There are two primary issues that are resolved in this PR: 1. The `mint` and `burn` functions were not implemented for coretime regions. These operations are essential for moving assets to and from the XCM holding register. 2. The transfer of non-fungible assets through XCM was previously disallowed. This was due to incorrectly benchmarking non-fungible asset transfers via XCM, which led to assigning it a weight of `Weight::Max`, effectively preventing its execution. ### `mint_into` and `burn` implementation This PR addresses the issue with cross-chain transferring regions back to the Coretime chain. Remote reserve transfers are performed by withdrawing and depositing the asset to and from the holding registry. This requires the asset to support burning and minting functionality. This PR adds burning and minting; however, they work a bit differently than usual so that the associated region record is not lost when burning. Instead of removing all the data, burning will set the owner of the region to `None`, and when minting it back, it will set it to an actual value. So, when cross-chain transferring, withdrawing into the registry will remove the region from its original owner, and when depositing it from the registry, it will set its owner to another account This was originally implemented in this PR: #3455, however we decided to move all of it to this single PR (https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3455#discussion_r1547324892) ### Fixes made in this PR - Update the `XcmReserveTransferFilter` on coretime chain since it is meant as a reserve chain for coretime regions. - Update the XCM benchmark to use `AssetTransactor` instead of assuming `pallet-balances` for fungible transfers. - Update the XCM benchmark to properly measure weight consumption for nonfungible reserve asset transfers. ATM reserve transfers via the extrinsic do not work since the weight for it is set to `Weight::max()`. Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/865 --------- Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Dónal Murray <donalm@seadanda.dev>
-