- Feb 26, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
## Problem During the bumping of the `polkadot-fellows` repository to `[email protected]`, I encountered a situation where the benchmarks `teleport_assets` and `reserve_transfer_assets` in AssetHubKusama started to fail. This issue arose due to a decreased ED balance for AssetHubs introduced [here](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/158/files#diff-80668ff8e793b64f36a9a3ec512df5cbca4ad448c157a5d81abda1b15f35f1daR213), and also because of a [missing CI pipeline](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/issues/197) to check the benchmarks, which went unnoticed. These benchmarks expect the `caller` to have enough: 1. balance to transfer (BTT) 2. balance for paying delivery (BFPD). So the initial balance was calculated as `ED * 100`, which seems reasonable: ``` const ED_MULTIPLIER: u32 = 100; let balance = existential_deposit.saturating_mul(ED_MULTIPLIER.into());` ``` The problem arises when the price for delivery is 100 times higher than the existential deposit. In other words, when `ED * 100` does not cover `BTT` + `BFPD`. I check AHR/AHW/AHK/AHP and this problem has only AssetHubKusama ``` ED: 3333333 calculated price to parent delivery: 1031666634 (from xcm logs from the benchmark) --- 3333333 * 100 - BTT(3333333) - BFPD(1031666634) = −701666667 ``` which results in the error; ``` 2024-02-23 09:19:42 Unable to charge fee with error Module(ModuleError { index: 31, error: [17, 0, 0, 0], message: Some("FeesNotMet") }) Error: Input("Benchmark pallet_xcm::reserve_transfer_assets failed: FeesNotMet") ``` ## Solution The benchmarks `teleport_assets` and `reserve_transfer_assets` were fixed by removing `ED * 100` and replacing it with `DeliveryHelper` logic, which calculates the (almost real) price for delivery and sets it along with the existential deposit as the initial balance for the account used in the benchmark. ## TODO - [ ] patch for 1.6 - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3466 - [ ] patch for 1.7 - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3465 - [ ] patch for 1.8 - TODO: PR --------- Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
-
- Feb 20, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
-
- Feb 16, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
-
- Feb 13, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
I found out during the cleanup of this deprecation message in the `polkadot-fellows` repository that we deprecated `CurrencyAdapter` without making the recommended changes. ## TODO - [ ] fix `polkadot-fellows` bump to 1.6.0 https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/159 --------- Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
-
s0me0ne-unkn0wn authored
It's a follow-up of #2949. It enables the lookahead collator to dynamically adjust the aura slot size, which may change during the runtime upgrade. It also addressed a couple of issues with time constants I missed in the original PR. Good news: it works. The parachain successfully switches from sync backing with 12s slots to async backing with 6s slots. Bad news: during the transitional period of a single block in which the actual runtime upgrade is performed, it still gets the old slot duration of 12s (as it gets it from the best block), resulting in a runtime panic (logs follow). That doesn't affect the following block production of the parachain. Ideas on how to improve the situation are appreciated. <details> ``` 2024-02-05 12:59:36.373 INFO tokio-runtime-worker sc_basic_authorship::basic_authorship: [Parachain]
🙌 Starting consensus session on top of parent 0x6fd2d8f904f12c22531bfabf77b16dc84a6a29e45d9ae358aa6547fbf3f0438b 2024-02-05 12:59:36.373 ERROR tokio-runtime-worker runtime: [Parachain] panicked at /home/s0me0ne/wrk/parity/polkadot-sdk/cumulus/pallets/aura-ext/src/consensus_hook.rs:69:9: assertion `left == right` failed: slot number mismatch left: Slot(142261198) right: Slot(284522396) 2024-02-05 12:59:36.373 WARN tokio-runtime-worker sp_state_machine::overlayed_changes::changeset: [Parachain] 1 storage transactions are left open by the runtime. Those will be rolled back. 2024-02-05 12:59:36.373 WARN tokio-runtime-worker sp_state_machine::overlayed_changes::changeset: [Parachain] 1 storage transactions are left open by the runtime. Those will be rolled back. 2024-02-05 12:59:36.373 WARN tokio-runtime-worker basic-authorship: [Parachain]❗ Inherent extrinsic returned unexpected error: Error at calling runtime api: Execution failed: Execution aborted due to trap: wasm trap: wasm `unreachable` instruction executed WASM backtrace: error while executing at wasm backtrace: 0: 0x4e4a3b - <unknown>!rust_begin_unwind 1: 0x46cf57 - <unknown>!core::panicking::panic_fmt::h3c280dba88683724 2: 0x46d238 - <unknown>!core::panicking::assert_failed_inner::hebac5970933beb4d 3: 0x3d00fc - <unknown>!core::panicking::assert_failed::h640a47e2fb5dfb4b 4: 0xd0db3 - <unknown>!frame_support::storage::transactional::with_transaction::hcbc31515f81b2ee1 5: 0x34d654 - <unknown>!<cumulus_pallet_parachain_system::pallet::Call<T> as frame_support::traits::dispatch::UnfilteredDispatchable>::dispatch_bypass_filter::{{closure}}::hb7c2c9a11fa88301 6: 0x3547db - <unknown>!environmental::local_key::LocalKey<T>::with::h783f2605ae27d6d3 7: 0x7f454 - <unknown>!<asset_hub_rococo_runtime::RuntimeCall as frame_support::traits::dispatch::UnfilteredDispatchable>::dispatch_bypass_filter::h5e11a01ab97c06c7 8: 0x7f237 - <unknown>!<asset_hub_rococo_runtime::RuntimeCall as sp_runtime::traits::Dispatchable>::dispatch::h7f8ae4a8fede71ca 9: 0x26a0f3 - <unknown>!frame_executive::Executive<System,Block,Context,UnsignedValidator,AllPalletsWithSystem,COnRuntimeUpgrade>::apply_extrinsic::h75e524ff34738391 10: 0x282211 - <unknown>!BlockBuilder_apply_extrinsic. Dropping. 2024-02-05 12:59:36.374 ERROR tokio-runtime-worker runtime: [Parachain] panicked at /home/s0me0ne/wrk/parity/polkadot-sdk/substrate/frame/aura/src/lib.rs:416:9: assertion `left == right` failed: Timestamp slot must match `CurrentSlot` left: Slot(142261198) right: Slot(284522396) 2024-02-05 12:59:36.374 WARN tokio-runtime-worker sp_state_machine::overlayed_changes::changeset: [Parachain] 1 storage transactions are left open by the runtime. Those will be rolled back. 2024-02-05 12:59:36.374 WARN tokio-runtime-worker sp_state_machine::overlayed_changes::changeset: [Parachain] 1 storage transactions are left open by the runtime. Those will be rolled back. 2024-02-05 12:59:36.374 WARN tokio-runtime-worker basic-authorship: [Parachain]❗ Inherent extrinsic returned unexpected error: Error at calling runtime api: Execution failed: Execution aborted due to trap: wasm trap: wasm `unreachable` instruction executed WASM backtrace: error while executing at wasm backtrace: 0: 0x4e4a3b - <unknown>!rust_begin_unwind 1: 0x46cf57 - <unknown>!core::panicking::panic_fmt::h3c280dba88683724 2: 0x46d238 - <unknown>!core::panicking::assert_failed_inner::hebac5970933beb4d 3: 0x3d00fc - <unknown>!core::panicking::assert_failed::h640a47e2fb5dfb4b 4: 0x9ece6 - <unknown>!frame_support::storage::transactional::with_transaction::h26f75cb9f9462088 5: 0x356d7e - <unknown>!environmental::local_key::LocalKey<T>::with::hbcf2d4e17b48fdb5 6: 0x7f507 - <unknown>!<asset_hub_rococo_runtime::RuntimeCall as frame_support::traits::dispatch::UnfilteredDispatchable>::dispatch_bypass_filter::h5e11a01ab97c06c7 7: 0x7f237 - <unknown>!<asset_hub_rococo_runtime::RuntimeCall as sp_runtime::traits::Dispatchable>::dispatch::h7f8ae4a8fede71ca 8: 0x26a0f3 - <unknown>!frame_executive::Executive<System,Block,Context,UnsignedValidator,AllPalletsWithSystem,COnRuntimeUpgrade>::apply_extrinsic::h75e524ff34738391 9: 0x282211 - <unknown>!BlockBuilder_apply_extrinsic. Dropping. 2024-02-05 12:59:36.374 DEBUG tokio-runtime-worker runtime::xcmp-queue-migration: [Parachain] Lazy migration finished: item gone 2024-02-05 12:59:36.374 ERROR tokio-runtime-worker runtime: [Parachain] panicked at /home/s0me0ne/wrk/parity/polkadot-sdk/cumulus/pallets/parachain-system/src/lib.rs:265:18: set_validation_data inherent needs to be present in every block! 2024-02-05 12:59:36.374 ERROR tokio-runtime-worker aura::cumulus: [Parachain] err=Error { inner: Proposing Caused by: 0: Error at calling runtime api: Execution failed: Execution aborted due to trap: wasm trap: wasm `unreachable` instruction executed WASM backtrace: error while executing at wasm backtrace: 0: 0x4e4a3b - <unknown>!rust_begin_unwind 1: 0x46cf57 - <unknown>!core::panicking::panic_fmt::h3c280dba88683724 2: 0x46da8b - <unknown>!core::option::expect_failed::hdf18d99c3adabca7 3: 0x2134cb - <unknown>!<cumulus_pallet_parachain_system::pallet::Pallet<T> as frame_support::traits::hooks::OnFinalize<<<<T as frame_system::pallet::Config>::Block as sp_runtime::traits::HeaderProvider>::HeaderT as sp_runtime::traits::Header>::Number>>::on_finalize::hf98aac39802896ba 4: 0x26a9d6 - <unknown>!frame_executive::Executive<System,Block,Context,UnsignedValidator,AllPalletsWithSystem,COnRuntimeUpgrade>::idle_and_finalize_hook::h32775c0df0749d92 5: 0x26ad9f - <unknown>!frame_executive::Executive<System,Block,Context,UnsignedValidator,AllPalletsWithSystem,COnRuntimeUpgrade>::finalize_block::h15e5a1a6b9ca8032 6: 0x2822bd - <unknown>!BlockBuilder_finalize_block 1: Execution failed: Execution aborted due to trap: wasm trap: wasm `unreachable` instruction executed WASM backtrace: error while executing at wasm backtrace: 0: 0x4e4a3b - <unknown>!rust_begin_unwind 1: 0x46cf57 - <unknown>!core::panicking::panic_fmt::h3c280dba88683724 2: 0x46da8b - <unknown>!core::option::expect_failed::hdf18d99c3adabca7 3: 0x2134cb - <unknown>!<cumulus_pallet_parachain_system::pallet::Pallet<T> as frame_support::traits::hooks::OnFinalize<<<<T as frame_system::pallet::Config>::Block as sp_runtime::traits::HeaderProvider>::HeaderT as sp_runtime::traits::Header>::Number>>::on_finalize::hf98aac39802896ba 4: 0x26a9d6 - <unknown>!frame_executive::Executive<System,Block,Context,UnsignedValidator,AllPalletsWithSystem,COnRuntimeUpgrade>::idle_and_finalize_hook::h32775c0df0749d92 5: 0x26ad9f - <unknown>!frame_executive::Executive<System,Block,Context,UnsignedValidator,AllPalletsWithSystem,COnRuntimeUpgrade>::finalize_block::h15e5a1a6b9ca8032 6: 0x2822bd - <unknown>!BlockBuilder_finalize_block } ``` </details> --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
- Feb 09, 2024
-
-
Egor_P authored
This PR backports version bumps from `1.7.0` release branch and moves related prdoc files to the appropriate folder.
-
- Feb 06, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
Relates to: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3214 ## TODO - [ ] backport to the `1.7.0` release
-
- Feb 02, 2024
-
-
Marcin S. authored
Built on top of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2826/ which was a trial run. Guide: https://github.com/w3f/polkadot-wiki/blob/master/docs/maintain/maintain-guides-async-backing.md --------- Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dmitry Sinyavin <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: s0me0ne-unkn0wn <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Svyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 31, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
[frame] `#[pallet::composite_enum]` improved variant count handling + removed `pallet_balances`'s `MaxHolds` config (#2657) I started this investigation/issue based on @liamaharon question [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1801#discussion_r1410452499). ## Problem The `pallet_balances` integrity test should correctly detect that the runtime has correct distinct `HoldReasons` variant count. I assume the same situation exists for RuntimeFreezeReason. It is not a critical problem, if we set `MaxHolds` with a sufficiently large value, everything should be ok. However, in this case, the integrity_test check becomes less useful. **Situation for "any" runtime:** - `HoldReason` enums from different pallets: ```rust /// from pallet_nis #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason { NftReceipt, } /// from pallet_preimage #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason { Preimage, } // from pallet_state-trie-migration #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason { SlashForContinueMigrate, SlashForMigrateCustomTop, SlashForMigrateCustomChild, } ``` - generated `RuntimeHoldReason` enum looks like: ```rust pub enum RuntimeHoldReason { #[codec(index = 32u8)] Preimage(pallet_preimage::HoldReason), #[codec(index = 38u8)] Nis(pallet_nis::HoldReason), #[codec(index = 42u8)] StateTrieMigration(pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason), } ``` - composite enum `RuntimeHoldReason` variant count is detected as `3` - we set `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>` - `pallet_balances::integrity_test` is ok with `3`(at least 3) However, the real problem can occur in a live runtime where some functionality might stop working. This is due to a total of 5 distinct hold reasons (for pallets with multi-instance support, it is even more), and not all of them can be used because of an incorrect `MaxHolds`, which is deemed acceptable according to the `integrity_test`: ``` // pseudo-code - if we try to call all of these: T::Currency::hold(&pallet_nis::HoldReason::NftReceipt.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; T::Currency::hold(&pallet_preimage::HoldReason::Preimage.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForContinueMigrate.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; // With `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>` these two will fail T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomTop.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomChild.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; ``` ## Solutions A macro `#[pallet::*]` expansion is extended of `VariantCount` implementation for the `#[pallet::composite_enum]` enum type. This expansion generates the `VariantCount` implementation for pallets' `HoldReason`, `FreezeReason`, `LockId`, and `SlashReason`. Enum variants must be plain enum values without fields to ensure a deterministic count. The composite runtime enum, `RuntimeHoldReason` and `RuntimeFreezeReason`, now sets `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT` as the sum of pallets' enum `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT`: ```rust #[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)] mod module_single_instance { #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason { ModuleSingleInstanceReason1, ModuleSingleInstanceReason2, } ... } #[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)] mod module_multi_instance { #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason<I: 'static = ()> { ModuleMultiInstanceReason1, ModuleMultiInstanceReason2, ModuleMultiInstanceReason3, } ... } impl self::sp_api_hidden_includes_construct_runtime::hidden_include::traits::VariantCount for RuntimeHoldReason { const VARIANT_COUNT: u32 = 0 + module_single_instance::HoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance1>::VARIANT_COUNT + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance2>::VARIANT_COUNT + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance3>::VARIANT_COUNT; } ``` In addition, `MaxHolds` is removed (as suggested [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2657#discussion_r1443324573)) from `pallet_balances`, and its `Holds` are now bounded to `RuntimeHoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT`. Therefore, there is no need to let the runtime specify `MaxHolds`. ## For reviewers Relevant changes can be found here: - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/lib.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/parse/composite.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/expand/composite.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/composite_helper.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/hold_reason.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/freeze_reason.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/src/traits/misc.rs` And the rest of the files is just about removed `MaxHolds` from `pallet_balances` ## Next steps Do the same for `MaxFreezes` https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2997. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: gupnik <[email protected]>
-
Branislav Kontur authored
The `parachains-common` contains a lots of constants and type definitions which are used for `polkadot-sdk`'s testnet runtimes and also for `polkadot-fellows`'s production [SP runtimes](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/tree/main/system-parachains/constants). This PR cleans `parachains-common` module to contain only common and generic functionality. Testnet-specific constants have been moved to the separate module dedicated just for testnets: `polkadot-sdk/cumulus/parachains/runtimes/constants/` Part of: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3054 --------- Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 30, 2024
-
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
Add `Balances::force_adjust_total_issuance` as preparation for fixing https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/issues/147. Important changes in `substrate/frame/balances/src/lib.rs`. TODO: - [x] Update weights --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
Reverts paritytech/polkadot-sdk#2302.
🤦 ♂️ should have checked the migration CI first. We either need to reduce the `max_message_size` for the open HRMP channels on the failing chains or increase the `PageSize` of the XCMP queue. Both would be fine on a test-net, but i assume this will also fail before the next SP runtime upgrade so first need to think what best to do. AFAIK its not possible currently to change the `max_message_size` of an open HRMP channel.
-
- Jan 29, 2024
-
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
Remove `without_storage_info` from the XCMP queue pallet. Part of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/323 Changes: - Limit the number of channels that can be suspended at the same time. - Limit the number of channels that can have messages or signals pending at the same time. A No-OP migration is put in place to ensure that all `BoundedVec`s still decode and not truncate after upgrade. The storage version is thereby bumped to 4 to have our tooling remind us to deploy that migration. --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 24, 2024
-
-
Just van Stam authored
Moved from: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6951 closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/490 - [x] update cumulus --- This PR introduces transactional processing of certain xcm instructions. For the list of instructions checkout https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/490. The transactional processing is implemented as an xcm-executor config item. The two implementations in this PR are `FrameTransactionalProcessor` and `()`. The `()` implementation does no transactional processing. Each implementation of the `ProcessTransaction` trait has an `IS_TRANSACTIONAL` const that tells the XCVM if transactional processing is actually implemented. If Transactional processing is implemented, changes to touched registers should also be rolled back to prevent inconsistencies. Note for reviewers: Check out the following safety assumption: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1222/files#diff-4effad7d8c1c9de19fd27e18661cbf2128c8718f3b2420a27d2f816e0749ea53R30 --------- Co-authored-by: Keith Yeung <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Jan 23, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
There were several improvements and PRs that didn't apply to all runtimes, so this PR attempts to align those small differences. In addition, the PR eliminates unused dependencies across multiple modules. Relates to PR for `polkadot-fellows`: https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/154
-
- Jan 22, 2024
-
-
joe petrowski authored
Clean up all the old syntax. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: gupnik <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Nikhil Gupta <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Maksym H <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 18, 2024
-
-
joe petrowski authored
Order: - [x] Start People Chain - [RPC node](https://polkadot.js.org/apps/?rpc=wss%3A%2F%2Frococo-people-rpc.polkadot.io#/explorer) - [x] Upgrade Rococo Relay (`EnsureRoot` -> `EnsureSigned`) (v1,006,002) - Done [here](https://rococo.subscan.io/extrinsic/0xef07e0f9dbb2b9e829305f132e6ce45d291239286e409177e20895e6687daa6c) - [x] Migrate all identities - Done, see extrinsics from [this account](https://rococo.subscan.io/account/5FyNYrBwndvBttTkGUqGGCRAXtBH4Mh8xELDaxaFywTsjDKb) - [x] Upgrade Rococo People (remove call filter) (v1,006,002) - Authorized [here](https://rococo.subscan.io/extrinsic/0xedf6a80229bd411b7ed8d3a489a767b0f773bed5c49239987a294c293a35b98b) With added: - [x] Upgrade Rococo People to fix `poke_deposit` bug (v1,006,001) - Authorized [here](https://rococo.subscan.io/extrinsic/0xd1dc3cd6e8274bd0196f8d9f13ed09f6e9c76e6a40f9786a1629f4cb22cf948d) Note: It's also possible to remove the Identity Migrator pallet from both the Relay Chain and the parachain at this time. I will leave them in for now to preserve the test cases until we run them on Kusama/Polkadot. We will also want a follow up to remove all Identity-related state from the Relay Chain.
-
- Jan 17, 2024
-
-
Egor_P authored
This PR backports version bumps from release branch `release-polkadot-v1.6.0` back to `master` and also moved `prdoc` files related to the release to the appropriate folder
-
Ignacio Palacios authored
After People Rococo deployment, we noticed that `safeXcmVersion` wasn't initialised. I think it is due to `Storage` missing in the pallet's declaration. This PR should fix it.
-
- Jan 16, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
# Note for reviewer Most changes are just syntax changes necessary for the new version. Most important files should be the ones under the `xcm` folder. # Description Added XCMv4. ## Removed `Multi` prefix The following types have been renamed: - MultiLocation -> Location - MultiAsset -> Asset - MultiAssets -> Assets - InteriorMultiLocation -> InteriorLocation - MultiAssetFilter -> AssetFilter - VersionedMultiAsset -> VersionedAsset - WildMultiAsset -> WildAsset - VersionedMultiLocation -> VersionedLocation In order to fix a name conflict, the `Assets` in `xcm-executor` were renamed to `HoldingAssets`, as they represent assets in holding. ## Removed `Abstract` asset id It was not being used anywhere and this simplifies the code. Now assets are just constructed as follows: ```rust let asset: Asset = (AssetId(Location::new(1, Here)), 100u128).into(); ``` No need for specifying `Concrete` anymore. ## Outcome is now a named fields struct Instead of ```rust pub enum Outcome { Complete(Weight), Incomplete(Weight, Error), Error(Error), } ``` we now have ```rust pub enum Outcome { Complete { used: Weight }, Incomplete { used: Weight, error: Error }, Error { error: Error }, } ``` ## Added Reanchorable trait Now both locations and assets implement this trait, making it easier to reanchor both. ## New syntax for building locations and junctions Now junctions are built using the following methods: ```rust let location = Location { parents: 1, interior: [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)].into() }; ``` or ```rust let location = Location::new(1, [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)]); ``` And they are matched like so: ```rust match location.unpack() { (1, [Parachain(id)]) => ... (0, Here) => ..., (1, [_]) => ..., } ``` This syntax is mandatory in v4, and has been also implemented for v2 and v3 for easier migration. This was needed to make all sizes smaller. # TODO - [x] Scaffold v4 - [x] Port github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7236 - [x] Remove `Multi` prefix - [x] Remove `Abstract` asset id --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Keith Yeung <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 10, 2024
-
-
joe petrowski authored
This PR allows _username authorities_ to issue unique usernames that correspond with an account. It also provides two-way lookup, that is from `AccountId` to a single, "primary" `Username` (alongside `Registration`) and multiple unique `Username`s to an `AccountId`. Key features: - Username Authorities added (and removed) via privileged origin. - Authorities have a `suffix` and an `allocation`. They can grant up to `allocation` usernames. Their `suffix` will be appended to the usernames that they issue. A suffix may be up to 7 characters long. - Users can ask an authority to grant them a username. This will take the form `myusername.suffix`. The entire name (including suffix) must be less than or equal to 32 alphanumeric characters. - Users can approve a username for themselves in one of two ways (that is, authorities cannot grant them arbitrarily): - Pre-sign the entire username (including suffix) with a secret key that corresponds to their `AccountId` (for keyed accounts, obviously); or - Accept the username after it has been granted by an authority (it will be queued until accepted) (for non-keyed accounts like pure proxies or multisigs). - The system does not require any funds or deposits. Users without an identity will be given a default one (presumably all fields set to `None`). If they update this info, they will need to place the normal storage deposit. - If a user does not have any username, their first one will be set as `Primary`, and their `AccountId` will map to that one. If they get subsequent usernames, they can choose which one to be their primary via `set_primary_username`. - There are some state cleanup functions to remove expired usernames that have not been accepted and dangling usernames whose owners have called `clear_identity`. TODO: - [x] Add migration to runtimes - [x] Probably do off-chain migration into People Chain genesis - [x] Address a few TODO questions in code (please review) --------- Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 05, 2024
-
-
Tsvetomir Dimitrov authored
Fix some issues reported by clippy
-
- Jan 04, 2024
-
-
Dónal Murray authored
-
- Dec 22, 2023
-
-
joe petrowski authored
Rococo and Westend runtimes for the "People Chain". This chain contains the Identity pallet with plans to migrate all related data from the Relay Chain. Changes `IdentityInfo` to: - Remove `additional_fields`. - Add `github` and `discord` as first class fields. From scraping chain data, these were the only two additional fields used (for the Fellowship and Ambassador Program, respectively). - Rename `riot` to `matrix`. Note: This will use the script in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2025 to generate the genesis state. TODO: - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1814 and integration of the Identity Migrator pallet for migration. - [x] Tests: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2373 --------- Co-authored-by: Muharem <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Michal Kucharczyk <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Richard Melkonian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]>
-