- Mar 19, 2024
-
-
Matteo Muraca authored
Part of #3326 cc @Kianenigma @ggwpez @liamaharon polkadot address: 12poSUQPtcF1HUPQGY3zZu2P8emuW9YnsPduA4XG3oCEfJVp --------- Signed-off-by: Matteo Muraca <[email protected]>
-
- Mar 15, 2024
-
-
gupnik authored
Step in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/171 This PR removes `as [disambiguation_path]` syntax from `derive_impl` usage across the polkadot-sdk as introduced in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3505
-
- Mar 13, 2024
-
-
georgepisaltu authored
Revert "FRAME: Create `TransactionExtension` as a replacement for `SignedExtension` (#2280)" (#3665) This PR reverts #2280 which introduced `TransactionExtension` to replace `SignedExtension`. As a result of the discussion [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3623#issuecomment-1986789700), the changes will be reverted for now with plans to reintroduce the concept in the future. --------- Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]>
-
- Mar 04, 2024
-
-
Gavin Wood authored
Closes #2160 First part of [Extrinsic Horizon](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2415) Introduces a new trait `TransactionExtension` to replace `SignedExtension`. Introduce the idea of transactions which obey the runtime's extensions and have according Extension data (né Extra data) yet do not have hard-coded signatures. Deprecate the terminology of "Unsigned" when used for transactions/extrinsics owing to there now being "proper" unsigned transactions which obey the extension framework and "old-style" unsigned which do not. Instead we have __*General*__ for the former and __*Bare*__ for the latter. (Ultimately, the latter will be phased out as a type of transaction, and Bare will only be used for Inherents.) Types of extrinsic are now therefore: - Bare (no hardcoded signature, no Extra data; used to be known as "Unsigned") - Bare transactions (deprecated): Gossiped, validated with `ValidateUnsigned` (deprecated) and the `_bare_compat` bits of `TransactionExtension` (deprecated). - Inherents: Not gossiped, validated with `ProvideInherent`. - Extended (Extra data): Gossiped, validated via `TransactionExtension`. - Signed transactions (with a hardcoded signature). - General transactions (without a hardcoded signature). `TransactionExtension` differs from `SignedExtension` because: - A signature on the underlying transaction may validly not be present. - It may alter the origin during validation. - `pre_dispatch` is renamed to `prepare` and need not contain the checks present in `validate`. - `validate` and `prepare` is passed an `Origin` rather than a `AccountId`. - `validate` may pass arbitrary information into `prepare` via a new user-specifiable type `Val`. - `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to `Implicit`/`implicit`. It is encoded *for the entire transaction* and passed in to each extension as a new argument to `validate`. This facilitates the ability of extensions to acts as underlying crypto. There is a new `DispatchTransaction` trait which contains only default function impls and is impl'ed for any `TransactionExtension` impler. It provides several utility functions which reduce some of the tedium from using `TransactionExtension` (indeed, none of its regular functions should now need to be called directly). Three transaction version discriminator ("versions") are now permissible: - 0b000000100: Bare (used to be called "Unsigned"): contains Signature or Extra (extension data). After bare transactions are no longer supported, this will strictly identify an Inherents only. - 0b100000100: Old-school "Signed" Transaction: contains Signature and Extra (extension data). - 0b010000100: New-school "General" Transaction: contains Extra (extension data), but no Signature. For the New-school General Transaction, it becomes trivial for authors to publish extensions to the mechanism for authorizing an Origin, e.g. through new kinds of key-signing schemes, ZK proofs, pallet state, mutations over pre-authenticated origins or any combination of the above. ## Code Migration ### NOW: Getting it to build Wrap your `SignedExtension`s in `AsTransactionExtension`. This should be accompanied by renaming your aggregate type in line with the new terminology. E.g. Before: ```rust /// The SignedExtension to the basic transaction logic. pub type SignedExtra = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension, ); /// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime. pub type UncheckedExtrinsic = generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, SignedExtra>; ``` After: ```rust /// The extension to the basic transaction logic. pub type TxExtension = ( /* snip */ AsTransactionExtension<MySpecialSignedExtension>, ); /// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime. pub type UncheckedExtrinsic = generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, TxExtension>; ``` You'll also need to alter any transaction building logic to add a `.into()` to make the conversion happen. E.g. Before: ```rust fn construct_extrinsic( /* snip */ ) -> UncheckedExtrinsic { let extra: SignedExtra = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */), ); let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), extra.clone()).unwrap(); let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e)); UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed( /* snip */ Signature::Sr25519(signature), extra, ) } ``` After: ```rust fn construct_extrinsic( /* snip */ ) -> UncheckedExtrinsic { let tx_ext: TxExtension = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */).into(), ); let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), tx_ext.clone()).unwrap(); let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e)); UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed( /* snip */ Signature::Sr25519(signature), tx_ext, ) } ``` ### SOON: Migrating to `TransactionExtension` Most `SignedExtension`s can be trivially converted to become a `TransactionExtension`. There are a few things to know. - Instead of a single trait like `SignedExtension`, you should now implement two traits individually: `TransactionExtensionBase` and `TransactionExtension`. - Weights are now a thing and must be provided via the new function `fn weight`. #### `TransactionExtensionBase` This trait takes care of anything which is not dependent on types specific to your runtime, most notably `Call`. - `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to `Implicit`/`implicit`. - Weight must be returned by implementing the `weight` function. If your extension is associated with a pallet, you'll probably want to do this via the pallet's existing benchmarking infrastructure. #### `TransactionExtension` Generally: - `pre_dispatch` is now `prepare` and you *should not reexecute the `validate` functionality in there*! - You don't get an account ID any more; you get an origin instead. If you need to presume an account ID, then you can use the trait function `AsSystemOriginSigner::as_system_origin_signer`. - You get an additional ticket, similar to `Pre`, called `Val`. This defines data which is passed from `validate` into `prepare`. This is important since you should not be duplicating logic from `validate` to `prepare`, you need a way of passing your working from the former into the latter. This is it. - This trait takes two type parameters: `Call` and `Context`. `Call` is the runtime call type which used to be an associated type; you can just move it to become a type parameter for your trait impl. `Context` is not currently used and you can safely implement over it as an unbounded type. - There's no `AccountId` associated type any more. Just remove it. Regarding `validate`: - You get three new parameters in `validate`; all can be ignored when migrating from `SignedExtension`. - `validate` returns a tuple on success; the second item in the tuple is the new ticket type `Self::Val` which gets passed in to `prepare`. If you use any information extracted during `validate` (off-chain and on-chain, non-mutating) in `prepare` (on-chain, mutating) then you can pass it through with this. For the tuple's last item, just return the `origin` argument. Regarding `prepare`: - This is renamed from `pre_dispatch`, but there is one change: - FUNCTIONALITY TO VALIDATE THE TRANSACTION NEED NOT BE DUPLICATED FROM `validate`!! - (This is different to `SignedExtension` which was required to run the same checks in `pre_dispatch` as in `validate`.) Regarding `post_dispatch`: - Since there are no unsigned transactions handled by `TransactionExtension`, `Pre` is always defined, so the first parameter is `Self::Pre` rather than `Option<Self::Pre>`. If you make use of `SignedExtension::validate_unsigned` or `SignedExtension::pre_dispatch_unsigned`, then: - Just use the regular versions of these functions instead. - Have your logic execute in the case that the `origin` is `None`. - Ensure your transaction creation logic creates a General Transaction rather than a Bare Transaction; this means having to include all `TransactionExtension`s' data. - `ValidateUnsigned` can still be used (for now) if you need to be able to construct transactions which contain none of the extension data, however these will be phased out in stage 2 of the Transactions Horizon, so you should consider moving to an extension-centric design. ## TODO - [x] Introduce `CheckSignature` impl of `TransactionExtension` to ensure it's possible to have crypto be done wholly in a `TransactionExtension`. - [x] Deprecate `SignedExtension` and move all uses in codebase to `TransactionExtension`. - [x] `ChargeTransactionPayment` - [x] `DummyExtension` - [x] `ChargeAssetTxPayment` (asset-tx-payment) - [x] `ChargeAssetTxPayment` (asset-conversion-tx-payment) - [x] `CheckWeight` - [x] `CheckTxVersion` - [x] `CheckSpecVersion` - [x] `CheckNonce` - [x] `CheckNonZeroSender` - [x] `CheckMortality` - [x] `CheckGenesis` - [x] `CheckOnlySudoAccount` - [x] `WatchDummy` - [x] `PrevalidateAttests` - [x] `GenericSignedExtension` - [x] `SignedExtension` (chain-polkadot-bulletin) - [x] `RefundSignedExtensionAdapter` - [x] Implement `fn weight` across the board. - [ ] Go through all pre-existing extensions which assume an account signer and explicitly handle the possibility of another kind of origin. - [x] `CheckNonce` should probably succeed in the case of a non-account origin. - [x] `CheckNonZeroSender` should succeed in the case of a non-account origin. - [x] `ChargeTransactionPayment` and family should fail in the case of a non-account origin. - [ ] - [x] Fix any broken tests. --------- Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Vasile <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Nikhil Gupta <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Chevdor <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Maciej <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Javier Viola <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Marcin S. <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tsvetomir Dimitrov <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Javier Bullrich <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Koute <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vladimir Istyufeev <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ross Bulat <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Svyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: André Silva <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: s0me0ne-unkn0wn <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sebastian Kunert <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Aaro Altonen <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dmitry Markin <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alexandru Vasile <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alexander Samusev <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Julian Eager <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Michal Kucharczyk <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Davide Galassi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: yjh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tom Mi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Will | Paradox | ParaNodes.io <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Joshy Orndorff <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Joshy Orndorff <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: PG Herveou <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alexander Theißen <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Juan Girini <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: bader y <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: James Wilson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: asynchronous rob <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Parth <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Andrew Jones <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jonathan Udd <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Serban Iorga <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Egor_P <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Evgeny Snitko <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Just van Stam <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: gupnik <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dzmitry-lahoda <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: zhiqiangxu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Nazar Mokrynskyi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Anwesh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: cheme <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sam Johnson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: kianenigma <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jegor Sidorenko <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Muharem <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: joepetrowski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Gabriel Facco de Arruda <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Squirrel <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Mar 01, 2024
-
-
Egor_P authored
This PR backports Node version and `spec_version` bumps to `1.8.0` from the latest release and orders prdoc files related to it.
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
If an XCM execution fails or ends with leftover assets, these will be trapped. In order to claim them, a custom XCM has to be executed, with the `ClaimAsset` instruction. However, arbitrary XCM execution is not allowed everywhere yet and XCM itself is still not easy enough to use for users out there with trapped assets. This new extrinsic in `pallet-xcm` will allow these users to easily claim their assets, without concerning themselves with writing arbitrary XCMs. Part of fixing https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3495 --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
-
- Feb 29, 2024
-
-
Tsvetomir Dimitrov authored
This PR removes `AssignmentProviderConfig` and uses the corresponding ondemand parameters from `HostConfiguration` instead. Additionally `scheduling_lookahead` and all coretime/ondemand related parameters are extracted in a separate struct - `SchedulerParams`. The most relevant commit from the PR is [this one](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3181/commits/830bc0f5). Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2268 --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Feb 28, 2024
-
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
This MR is the merge of https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/14414 and https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/14275. It implements [RFC#13](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/RFCs/pull/13), closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/198. ----- This Merge request introduces three major topicals: 1. Multi-Block-Migrations 1. New pallet `poll` hook for periodic service work 1. Replacement hooks for `on_initialize` and `on_finalize` in cases where `poll` cannot be used and some more general changes to FRAME. The changes for each topical span over multiple crates. They are listed in topical order below. # 1.) Multi-Block-Migrations Multi-Block-Migrations are facilitated by creating `pallet_migrations` and configuring `System::Config::MultiBlockMigrator` to point to it. Executive picks this up and triggers one step of the migrations pallet per block. The chain is in lockdown mode for as long as an MBM is ongoing. Executive does this by polling `MultiBlockMigrator::ongoing` and not allowing any transaction in a block, if true. A MBM is defined through trait `SteppedMigration`. A condensed version looks like this: ```rust /// A migration that can proceed in multiple steps. pub trait SteppedMigration { type Cursor: FullCodec + MaxEncodedLen; type Identifier: FullCodec + MaxEncodedLen; fn id() -> Self::Identifier; fn max_steps() -> Option<u32>; fn step( cursor: Option<Self::Cursor>, meter: &mut WeightMeter, ) -> Result<Option<Self::Cursor>, SteppedMigrationError>; } ``` `pallet_migrations` can be configured with an aggregated tuple of these migrations. It then starts to migrate them one-by-one on the next runtime upgrade. Two things are important here: - 1. Doing another runtime upgrade while MBMs are ongoing is not a good idea and can lead to messed up state. - 2. **Pallet Migrations MUST BE CONFIGURED IN `System::Config`, otherwise it is not used.** The pallet supports an `UpgradeStatusHandler` that can be used to notify external logic of upgrade start/finish (for example to pause XCM dispatch). Error recovery is very limited in the case that a migration errors or times out (exceeds its `max_steps`). Currently the runtime dev can decide in `FailedMigrationHandler::failed` how to handle this. One follow-up would be to pair this with the `SafeMode` pallet and enact safe mode when an upgrade fails, to allow governance to rescue the chain. This is currently not possible, since governance is not `Mandatory`. ## Runtime API - `Core`: `initialize_block` now returns `ExtrinsicInclusionMode` to inform the Block Author whether they can push transactions. ### Integration Add it to your runtime implementation of `Core` and `BlockBuilder`: ```patch diff --git a/runtime/src/lib.rs b/runtime/src/lib.rs @@ impl_runtime_apis! { impl sp_block_builder::Core<Block> for Runtime { - fn initialize_block(header: &<Block as BlockT>::Header) { + fn initialize_block(header: &<Block as BlockT>::Header) -> RuntimeExecutiveMode { Executive::initialize_block(header) } ... } ``` # 2.) `poll` hook A new pallet hook is introduced: `poll`. `Poll` is intended to replace mostly all usage of `on_initialize`. The reason for this is that any code that can be called from `on_initialize` cannot be migrated through an MBM. Currently there is no way to statically check this; the implication is to use `on_initialize` as rarely as possible. Failing to do so can result in broken storage invariants. The implementation of the poll hook depends on the `Runtime API` changes that are explained above. # 3.) Hard-Deadline callbacks Three new callbacks are introduced and configured on `System::Config`: `PreInherents`, `PostInherents` and `PostTransactions`. These hooks are meant as replacement for `on_initialize` and `on_finalize` in cases where the code that runs cannot be moved to `poll`. The reason for this is to make the usage of HD-code (hard deadline) more explicit - again to prevent broken invariants by MBMs. # 4.) FRAME (general changes) ## `frame_system` pallet A new memorize storage item `InherentsApplied` is added. It is used by executive to track whether inherents have already been applied. Executive and can then execute the MBMs directly between inherents and transactions. The `Config` gets five new items: - `SingleBlockMigrations` this is the new way of configuring migrations that run in a single block. Previously they were defined as last generic argument of `Executive`. This shift is brings all central configuration about migrations closer into view of the developer (migrations that are configured in `Executive` will still work for now but is deprecated). - `MultiBlockMigrator` this can be configured to an engine that drives MBMs. One example would be the `pallet_migrations`. Note that this is only the engine; the exact MBMs are injected into the engine. - `PreInherents` a callback that executes after `on_initialize` but before inherents. - `PostInherents` a callback that executes after all inherents ran (including MBMs and `poll`). - `PostTransactions` in symmetry to `PreInherents`, this one is called before `on_finalize` but after all transactions. A sane default is to set all of these to `()`. Example diff suitable for any chain: ```patch @@ impl frame_system::Config for Test { type MaxConsumers = ConstU32<16>; + type SingleBlockMigrations = (); + type MultiBlockMigrator = (); + type PreInherents = (); + type PostInherents = (); + type PostTransactions = (); } ``` An overview of how the block execution now looks like is here. The same graph is also in the rust doc. <details><summary>Block Execution Flow</summary> <p> ![Screenshot 2023-12-04 at 19 11 29](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/10380170/e88a80c4-ef11-4faa-8df5-8b33a724c054) </p> </details> ## Inherent Order Moved to https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2154 --------------- ## TODO - [ ] Check that `try-runtime` still works - [ ] Ensure backwards compatibility with old Runtime APIs - [x] Consume weight correctly - [x] Cleanup --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Juan Girini <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Gavin Wood <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
- Feb 26, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
## Problem During the bumping of the `polkadot-fellows` repository to `[email protected]`, I encountered a situation where the benchmarks `teleport_assets` and `reserve_transfer_assets` in AssetHubKusama started to fail. This issue arose due to a decreased ED balance for AssetHubs introduced [here](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/158/files#diff-80668ff8e793b64f36a9a3ec512df5cbca4ad448c157a5d81abda1b15f35f1daR213), and also because of a [missing CI pipeline](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/issues/197) to check the benchmarks, which went unnoticed. These benchmarks expect the `caller` to have enough: 1. balance to transfer (BTT) 2. balance for paying delivery (BFPD). So the initial balance was calculated as `ED * 100`, which seems reasonable: ``` const ED_MULTIPLIER: u32 = 100; let balance = existential_deposit.saturating_mul(ED_MULTIPLIER.into());` ``` The problem arises when the price for delivery is 100 times higher than the existential deposit. In other words, when `ED * 100` does not cover `BTT` + `BFPD`. I check AHR/AHW/AHK/AHP and this problem has only AssetHubKusama ``` ED: 3333333 calculated price to parent delivery: 1031666634 (from xcm logs from the benchmark) --- 3333333 * 100 - BTT(3333333) - BFPD(1031666634) = −701666667 ``` which results in the error; ``` 2024-02-23 09:19:42 Unable to charge fee with error Module(ModuleError { index: 31, error: [17, 0, 0, 0], message: Some("FeesNotMet") }) Error: Input("Benchmark pallet_xcm::reserve_transfer_assets failed: FeesNotMet") ``` ## Solution The benchmarks `teleport_assets` and `reserve_transfer_assets` were fixed by removing `ED * 100` and replacing it with `DeliveryHelper` logic, which calculates the (almost real) price for delivery and sets it along with the existential deposit as the initial balance for the account used in the benchmark. ## TODO - [ ] patch for 1.6 - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3466 - [ ] patch for 1.7 - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3465 - [ ] patch for 1.8 - TODO: PR --------- Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
-
eskimor authored
from Westend and Rococo. --------- Co-authored-by: eskimor <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Feb 19, 2024
-
-
Anton Vilhelm Ásgeirsson authored
Adds the coretime and on demand pallets to enable Coretime on Westend. In order for the migration to run successfully, we need the Broker/Coretime parachain to be live. TODO: - [ ] Broker parachain is live https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3272 --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
s0me0ne-unkn0wn authored
This is a follow-up for `im-online` pallet removal that is cleaning up its off-chain storage. Must be merged no earlier than #2265 is enacted. Related: #1964 --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
- Feb 09, 2024
-
-
Egor_P authored
This PR backports version bumps from `1.7.0` release branch and moves related prdoc files to the appropriate folder.
-
- Feb 08, 2024
-
-
Gonçalo Pestana authored
The `TotalLockedValue` storage value in nomination pools pallet may get out of sync if the staking pallet does implicit withdrawal of unlocking chunks belonging to a bonded pool stash. This fix is based on a new method in the `OnStakingUpdate` traits, `on_withdraw`, which allows the nomination pools pallet to adjust the `TotalLockedValue` every time there is an implicit or explicit withdrawal from a bonded pool's stash. This PR also adds a migration that checks and updates the on-chain TVL if it got out of sync due to the bug this PR fixes. **Changes to `trait OnStakingUpdate`** In order for staking to notify the nomination pools pallet that chunks where withdrew, we add a new method, `on_withdraw` to the `OnStakingUpdate` trait. The nomination pools pallet filters the withdraws that are related to bonded pool accounts and updates the `TotalValueLocked` accordingly. **Others** - Adds try-state checks to the EPM/staking e2e tests - Adds tests for auto withdrawing in the context of nomination pools **To-do** - [x] check if we need a migration to fix the current `TotalValueLocked` (run try-runtime) - [x] migrations to fix the current on-chain TVL value
✅ **Kusama**: ``` TotalValueLocked: 99.4559 kKSM TotalValueLocked (calculated) 99.4559 kKSM ```⚠ ️ **Westend**: ``` TotalValueLocked: 18.4060 kWND TotalValueLocked (calculated) 18.4050 kWND ``` **Polkadot**: TVL not released yet. Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3055 --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Ross Bulat <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]>
-
- Feb 06, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
Relates to: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3214 ## TODO - [ ] backport to the `1.7.0` release
-
- Jan 31, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
[frame] `#[pallet::composite_enum]` improved variant count handling + removed `pallet_balances`'s `MaxHolds` config (#2657) I started this investigation/issue based on @liamaharon question [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1801#discussion_r1410452499). ## Problem The `pallet_balances` integrity test should correctly detect that the runtime has correct distinct `HoldReasons` variant count. I assume the same situation exists for RuntimeFreezeReason. It is not a critical problem, if we set `MaxHolds` with a sufficiently large value, everything should be ok. However, in this case, the integrity_test check becomes less useful. **Situation for "any" runtime:** - `HoldReason` enums from different pallets: ```rust /// from pallet_nis #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason { NftReceipt, } /// from pallet_preimage #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason { Preimage, } // from pallet_state-trie-migration #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason { SlashForContinueMigrate, SlashForMigrateCustomTop, SlashForMigrateCustomChild, } ``` - generated `RuntimeHoldReason` enum looks like: ```rust pub enum RuntimeHoldReason { #[codec(index = 32u8)] Preimage(pallet_preimage::HoldReason), #[codec(index = 38u8)] Nis(pallet_nis::HoldReason), #[codec(index = 42u8)] StateTrieMigration(pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason), } ``` - composite enum `RuntimeHoldReason` variant count is detected as `3` - we set `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>` - `pallet_balances::integrity_test` is ok with `3`(at least 3) However, the real problem can occur in a live runtime where some functionality might stop working. This is due to a total of 5 distinct hold reasons (for pallets with multi-instance support, it is even more), and not all of them can be used because of an incorrect `MaxHolds`, which is deemed acceptable according to the `integrity_test`: ``` // pseudo-code - if we try to call all of these: T::Currency::hold(&pallet_nis::HoldReason::NftReceipt.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; T::Currency::hold(&pallet_preimage::HoldReason::Preimage.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForContinueMigrate.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; // With `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>` these two will fail T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomTop.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomChild.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; ``` ## Solutions A macro `#[pallet::*]` expansion is extended of `VariantCount` implementation for the `#[pallet::composite_enum]` enum type. This expansion generates the `VariantCount` implementation for pallets' `HoldReason`, `FreezeReason`, `LockId`, and `SlashReason`. Enum variants must be plain enum values without fields to ensure a deterministic count. The composite runtime enum, `RuntimeHoldReason` and `RuntimeFreezeReason`, now sets `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT` as the sum of pallets' enum `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT`: ```rust #[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)] mod module_single_instance { #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason { ModuleSingleInstanceReason1, ModuleSingleInstanceReason2, } ... } #[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)] mod module_multi_instance { #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason<I: 'static = ()> { ModuleMultiInstanceReason1, ModuleMultiInstanceReason2, ModuleMultiInstanceReason3, } ... } impl self::sp_api_hidden_includes_construct_runtime::hidden_include::traits::VariantCount for RuntimeHoldReason { const VARIANT_COUNT: u32 = 0 + module_single_instance::HoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance1>::VARIANT_COUNT + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance2>::VARIANT_COUNT + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance3>::VARIANT_COUNT; } ``` In addition, `MaxHolds` is removed (as suggested [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2657#discussion_r1443324573)) from `pallet_balances`, and its `Holds` are now bounded to `RuntimeHoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT`. Therefore, there is no need to let the runtime specify `MaxHolds`. ## For reviewers Relevant changes can be found here: - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/lib.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/parse/composite.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/expand/composite.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/composite_helper.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/hold_reason.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/freeze_reason.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/src/traits/misc.rs` And the rest of the files is just about removed `MaxHolds` from `pallet_balances` ## Next steps Do the same for `MaxFreezes` https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2997. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: gupnik <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 30, 2024
-
-
Robert Hambrock authored
Moves `pallet_mmr` back behind `pallet_session` to address polkadot-fellows/runtimes#160. Opening draft for CI - should be merged or closed depending on outcome of w3f/polkadot-spec#718. --------- Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 24, 2024
-
-
Just van Stam authored
Moved from: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6951 closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/490 - [x] update cumulus --- This PR introduces transactional processing of certain xcm instructions. For the list of instructions checkout https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/490. The transactional processing is implemented as an xcm-executor config item. The two implementations in this PR are `FrameTransactionalProcessor` and `()`. The `()` implementation does no transactional processing. Each implementation of the `ProcessTransaction` trait has an `IS_TRANSACTIONAL` const that tells the XCVM if transactional processing is actually implemented. If Transactional processing is implemented, changes to touched registers should also be rolled back to prevent inconsistencies. Note for reviewers: Check out the following safety assumption: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1222/files#diff-4effad7d8c1c9de19fd27e18661cbf2128c8718f3b2420a27d2f816e0749ea53R30 --------- Co-authored-by: Keith Yeung <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Jan 23, 2024
-
-
joe petrowski authored
-
- Jan 22, 2024
-
-
joe petrowski authored
Clean up all the old syntax. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: gupnik <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Nikhil Gupta <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Maksym H <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 18, 2024
-
-
Tsvetomir Dimitrov authored
Backport of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1863 to master Extend candidate sanitation in paras_inherent by removing backing votes from disabled validators. Check https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1592 for more details. This change is related to the disabling strategy implementation (https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2226). --------- Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Maciej <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 17, 2024
-
-
Egor_P authored
This PR backports version bumps from release branch `release-polkadot-v1.6.0` back to `master` and also moved `prdoc` files related to the release to the appropriate folder
-
- Jan 16, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
# Note for reviewer Most changes are just syntax changes necessary for the new version. Most important files should be the ones under the `xcm` folder. # Description Added XCMv4. ## Removed `Multi` prefix The following types have been renamed: - MultiLocation -> Location - MultiAsset -> Asset - MultiAssets -> Assets - InteriorMultiLocation -> InteriorLocation - MultiAssetFilter -> AssetFilter - VersionedMultiAsset -> VersionedAsset - WildMultiAsset -> WildAsset - VersionedMultiLocation -> VersionedLocation In order to fix a name conflict, the `Assets` in `xcm-executor` were renamed to `HoldingAssets`, as they represent assets in holding. ## Removed `Abstract` asset id It was not being used anywhere and this simplifies the code. Now assets are just constructed as follows: ```rust let asset: Asset = (AssetId(Location::new(1, Here)), 100u128).into(); ``` No need for specifying `Concrete` anymore. ## Outcome is now a named fields struct Instead of ```rust pub enum Outcome { Complete(Weight), Incomplete(Weight, Error), Error(Error), } ``` we now have ```rust pub enum Outcome { Complete { used: Weight }, Incomplete { used: Weight, error: Error }, Error { error: Error }, } ``` ## Added Reanchorable trait Now both locations and assets implement this trait, making it easier to reanchor both. ## New syntax for building locations and junctions Now junctions are built using the following methods: ```rust let location = Location { parents: 1, interior: [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)].into() }; ``` or ```rust let location = Location::new(1, [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)]); ``` And they are matched like so: ```rust match location.unpack() { (1, [Parachain(id)]) => ... (0, Here) => ..., (1, [_]) => ..., } ``` This syntax is mandatory in v4, and has been also implemented for v2 and v3 for easier migration. This was needed to make all sizes smaller. # TODO - [x] Scaffold v4 - [x] Port github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7236 - [x] Remove `Multi` prefix - [x] Remove `Abstract` asset id --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Keith Yeung <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 10, 2024
-
-
joe petrowski authored
This PR allows _username authorities_ to issue unique usernames that correspond with an account. It also provides two-way lookup, that is from `AccountId` to a single, "primary" `Username` (alongside `Registration`) and multiple unique `Username`s to an `AccountId`. Key features: - Username Authorities added (and removed) via privileged origin. - Authorities have a `suffix` and an `allocation`. They can grant up to `allocation` usernames. Their `suffix` will be appended to the usernames that they issue. A suffix may be up to 7 characters long. - Users can ask an authority to grant them a username. This will take the form `myusername.suffix`. The entire name (including suffix) must be less than or equal to 32 alphanumeric characters. - Users can approve a username for themselves in one of two ways (that is, authorities cannot grant them arbitrarily): - Pre-sign the entire username (including suffix) with a secret key that corresponds to their `AccountId` (for keyed accounts, obviously); or - Accept the username after it has been granted by an authority (it will be queued until accepted) (for non-keyed accounts like pure proxies or multisigs). - The system does not require any funds or deposits. Users without an identity will be given a default one (presumably all fields set to `None`). If they update this info, they will need to place the normal storage deposit. - If a user does not have any username, their first one will be set as `Primary`, and their `AccountId` will map to that one. If they get subsequent usernames, they can choose which one to be their primary via `set_primary_username`. - There are some state cleanup functions to remove expired usernames that have not been accepted and dangling usernames whose owners have called `clear_identity`. TODO: - [x] Add migration to runtimes - [x] Probably do off-chain migration into People Chain genesis - [x] Address a few TODO questions in code (please review) --------- Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 06, 2024
-
-
Serban Iorga authored
Related to https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2787 Adding BEEFY support to the kitchensink chain in order to be able to extend the current warp sync zombienet tests with BEEFY enabled
-
- Dec 21, 2023
-
-
eskimor authored
Also fixes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1417 - [x] CoreIndex -> AssignmentProvider mapping will be able to change any time. - [x] Implement - [x] Provide Migrations - [x] Add and fix tests - [x] Implement bulk assigner logic - [x] bulk assigner tests - [x] Port over current assigner to use bulk designer (+ share on-demand with bulk): top-level assigner has core ranges: legacy, bulk - [x] Adjust migrations to reflect new assigner structure - [x] Move migration code to Assignment code directly and make it recursive (make it possible to skip releases) -> follow up ticket. - [x] Test migrations - [x] Add migration PR to runtimes repo -> follow up ticket. - [x] Wire up with actual UMP messages - [x] Write PR docs --------- Co-authored-by: eskimor <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bradley Olson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: BradleyOlson64 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Anton Vilhelm Ásgeirsson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: antonva <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Marcin S. <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Dec 15, 2023
-
-
Ankan authored
closes https://github.com/paritytech-secops/srlabs_findings/issues/78. Removes `BetterUnsignedThreshold` from pallet EPM. This will essentially mean any solution submitted by the validator that is strictly better than the current queued solution would be accepted. The reason for having these thresholds is to limit number of solutions submitted on-chain. However for unsigned submissions, the number of solutions that could be submitted on average is limited even without thresholding (calculation shown in the corresponding issue).
-
- Dec 14, 2023
-
-
Egor_P authored
This PR backports `transaction_version` bump from `1.5.0` release back to `master`
-
- Dec 13, 2023
-
-
Alexandru Gheorghe authored
Initial implementation for the plan discussed here: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/701 Built on top of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1178 v0: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7554, ## Overall idea When approval-voting checks a candidate and is ready to advertise the approval, defer it in a per-relay chain block until we either have MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT candidates to sign or a candidate has stayed MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS in the queue, in both cases we sign what candidates we have available. This should allow us to reduce the number of approvals messages we have to create/send/verify. The parameters are configurable, so we should find some values that balance: - Security of the network: Delaying broadcasting of an approval shouldn't but the finality at risk and to make sure that never happens we won't delay sending a vote if we are past 2/3 from the no-show time. - Scalability of the network: MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT = 1 & MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS =0, is what we have now and we know from the measurements we did on versi, it bottlenecks approval-distribution/approval-voting when increase significantly the number of validators and parachains - Block storage: In case of disputes we have to import this votes on chain and that increase the necessary storage with MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT * CandidateHash per vote. Given that disputes are not the normal way of the network functioning and we will limit MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT in the single digits numbers, this should be good enough. Alternatively, we could try to create a better way to store this on-chain through indirection, if that's needed. ## Other fixes: - Fixed the fact that we were sending random assignments to non-validators, that was wrong because those won't do anything with it and they won't gossip it either because they do not have a grid topology set, so we would waste the random assignments. - Added metrics to be able to debug potential no-shows and mis-processing of approvals/assignments. ## TODO: - [x] Get feedback, that this is moving in the right direction. @ordian @sandreim @eskimor @burdges, let me know what you think. - [x] More and more testing. - [x] Test in versi. - [x] Make MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT & MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_WAIT_MILLIS a parachain host configuration. - [x] Make sure the backwards compatibility works correctly - [x] Make sure this direction is compatible with other streams of work: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/635 & https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/742 - [x] Final versi burn-in before merging --------- Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
-
- Dec 12, 2023
-
-
Chevdor authored
This PR introduces a script and some templates to use the prdoc involved in a release and build: - the changelog - a simple draft of audience documentation Since the prdoc presence was enforced in the middle of the version 1.5.0, not all PRs did come with a `prdoc` file. This PR creates all the missing `prdoc` files with some minimum content allowing to properly generate the changelog. The generated content is **not** suitable for the audience documentation. The audience documentation will be possible with the next version, when all PR come with a proper `prdoc`. ## Assumptions - the prdoc files for release `vX.Y.Z` have been moved under `prdoc/X.Y.Z` - the changelog requires for now for the prdoc files to contain author + topic. Thos fields are optional. The build script can be called as: ``` VERSION=X.Y.Z ./scripts/release/build-changelogs.sh ``` Related: - #1408 --------- Co-authored-by: EgorPopelyaev <[email protected]>
-
Ross Bulat authored
Partially Addresses #2500 Adds a `deprecate_controller_batch` call to the staking pallet that is callable by `Root` and `StakingAdmin`. To be used for controller account deprecation and removed thereafter. Adds `MaxControllersDeprecationBatch` pallet constant that defines max possible deprecations per call. - [x] Add `deprecate_controller_batch` call, and `MaxControllersInDeprecationBatch` constant. - [x] Add tests, benchmark, weights. Tests that weight is only consumed if unique pair. - [x] Adds `StakingAdmin` origin to staking's `AdminOrigin` type in westend runtime. - [x] Determined that worst case 5,900 deprecations does fit into `maxBlock` `proofSize` and `refTime` in both normal and operational thresholds, meaning we can deprecate all controllers for each network in one call. ## Block Weights By querying `consts.system.blockWeights` we can see that the `deprecate_controller_batch` weights fit within the `normal` threshold on Polkadot. #### `controller_deprecation_batch` where i = 5900: #### Ref time: 69,933,325,300 #### Proof size: 21,040,390 ### Polkadot ``` // consts.query.blockWeights maxBlock: { refTime: 2,000,000,000,000 proofSize: 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 } normal: { maxExtrinsic: { refTime: 1,479,873,955,000 proofSize: 13,650,590,614,545,068,195 } maxTotal: { refTime: 1,500,000,000,000 proofSize: 13,835,058,055,282,163,711 } } ``` ### Kusama ``` // consts.query.blockWeights maxBlock: { refTime: 2,000,000,000,000 proofSize: 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 } normal: { maxExtrinsic: { refTime: 1,479,875,294,000 proofSize: 13,650,590,614,545,068,195 } maxTotal: { refTime: 1,500,000,000,000 proofSize: 13,835,058,055,282,163,711 } } ``` --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <[email protected]>
-
- Dec 11, 2023
-
-
Gabriel Facco de Arruda authored
This PR makes the block number provider configurable through the Config trait in pallet-vesting, this gives parachains the option to use the relay chain block number provider from ParachainSystem. --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
- Dec 07, 2023
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2641
-
- Dec 06, 2023
-
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
# Motivation (+testing) ### Enable easy `ForeignAssets` transfers using `pallet-xcm` We had just previously added capabilities to teleport fees during reserve-based transfers, but what about reserve-transferring fees when needing to teleport some non-fee asset? This PR aligns everything under either explicit reserve-transfer, explicit teleport, or this new flexible `transfer_assets()` which can mix and match as needed with fewer artificial constraints imposed to the user. This will enable, for example, a (non-system) parachain to teleport their `ForeignAssets` assets to AssetHub while using DOT to pay fees. (the assets are teleported - as foreign assets should from their owner chain - while DOT used for fees can only be reserve-based transferred between said parachain and AssetHub). Added `xcm-emulator` tests for this scenario ^. # Description Reverts `(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets` to only allow reserve-based transfers for all `assets` including fees. Similarly `(limited_)teleport_assets` only allows teleports for all `assets` including fees. For complex combinations of asset transfers where assets and fees may have different reserves or different reserve/teleport trust configurations, users can use the newly added `transfer_assets()` extrinsic which is more flexible in allowing more complex scenarios. `assets` (excluding `fees`) must have same reserve location or otherwise be teleportable to `dest`. No limitations imposed on `fees`. - for local reserve: transfer assets to sovereign account of destination chain and forward a notification XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`. - for destination reserve: burn local assets and forward a notification to `dest` chain to withdraw the reserve assets from this chain's sovereign account and deposit them to `beneficiary`. - for remote reserve: burn local assets, forward XCM to reserve chain to move reserves from this chain's SA to `dest` chain's SA, and forward another XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`. - for teleports: burn local assets and forward XCM to `dest` chain to mint/teleport assets and deposit them to `beneficiary`. ## Review notes Only around 500 lines are prod code (see `pallet_xcm/src/lib.rs`), the rest of the PR is new tests and improving existing tests. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Dec 05, 2023
-
-
gupnik authored
-
- Nov 29, 2023
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
The `BlockNumber` and `Hash` are fixed types any way.
-
- Nov 28, 2023
-
-
s0me0ne-unkn0wn authored
Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vladimir Istyufeev <[email protected]>
-
Ross Bulat authored
Addresses #409. This request has been raised by multiple community members - the ability for the nomination pool root role to configure permissionless commission claiming: > Would it be possible to have a claim_commission_other extrinsic for claiming commission of nomination pools permissionless? This PR does not quite introduce this additional call, but amends `do_claim_commission` to check a new `claim_permission` field in the `Commission` struct, configured by an enum: ``` enum CommissionClaimPermission { Permissionless, Account(AccountId), } ``` This can be optionally set in a bonded pool's `commission.claim_permission` field: ``` struct BondedPool { commission: { <snip> claim_permission: Option<CommissionClaimPermission<T::AccountId>>, }, <snip> } ``` This is a new field and requires a migration to add it to existing pools. This will be `None` on pool creation, falling back to the `root` role having sole access to claim commission if it is not set; this is the behaviour as it is today. Once set, the field _can_ be set to `None` again. #### Changes - [x] Add `commision.claim_permission` field. - [x] Add `can_claim_commission` and amend `do_claim_commission`. - [x] Add `set_commission_claim_permission` call. - [x] Test to cover new configs and call. - [x] Add and amend benchmarks. - [x] Generate new weights + slot into call `set_commission_claim_permission`. - [x] Add migration to introduce `commission.claim_permission`, bump storage version. - [x] Update Westend weights. - [x] Migration working. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Nov 27, 2023
-
-
Chevdor authored
## Overview This PR aligns the `spec_version` formatting to the [recent changes](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/26/files#diff-efa4caeb17487ecb13d8f5eb7863c3241d84afa2e73fbf25909a2ca89df0f362R142) made for the Polkadot/Kusama runtimes. It also backports the latest version `v1.4.0` bumps as `1_004_000`. ## Details During the switch from `v0.9` to `v1.x`, the format of the `spec_version` was modified from: `(M)m_ppp` for a runtime considered on version `M.m.pp`. For instance `0.9.42` had a `spec_version` of `9420`. With the transition to `v1.x`, the format was changed to a bigger number (still `u32`) formatted as `MM_mm_ppp` where `1.2.3` would be stored as `01_02_003`. This PR aligns the format with that has been introduced in the fellowship repo: `MMM_mmm_ppp`. --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 17, 2023
-
-
Bruno Galvao authored
The versioned migrations are already there in pallet nomination-pools: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/f6ee4781/substrate/frame/nomination-pools/src/migration.rs#L27-L48 Just updating the kitchensink runtime to point to them. This is also nice because it points the dev to an example of how to use `VersionedMigration`.
-