- Oct 31, 2023
-
-
Adel Arja authored
# Description The `trigger_defensive` call has been added to the `root-testing` pallet. The idea is to have this pallet running on `Rococo/Westend` and use it to verify if the runtime monitoring works end-to-end. To accomplish this, `trigger_defensive` dispatches an event when it is called. Closes #1953 # Checklist - [x] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the "Description" section above - [ ] My PR follows the [labeling requirements](CONTRIBUTING.md#Process) of this project (at minimum one label for `T` required) - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if applicable) - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if applicable) You can remove the "Checklist" section once all have been checked. Thank you for your contribution! ✄ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
-
Alexandru Gheorghe authored
We shouldn't override with their default fields that have been added in the previous version(v8), because we are going to lose whatever values have been set. Note, v8 & v9 seems to have landed at the same time on Rococo, probably they will land at the same time on westend and other chains, so functionally doesn't make much difference, but let's have this fixed for people that copy-paste :D, like me. --------- Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
-
- Oct 27, 2023
-
-
Liam Aharon authored
Closes https://github.com/paritytech/release-engineering/issues/6 Adds a new Github Workflow which on a new release being created, builds and attaches all runtimes managed in this repository in two flavours: - `dev-debug-build`: Built with the `try-runtime` feature and has logging enabled - `on-chain-release`: Built with the regular old `on-chain-release` feature The new Github Workflow could be extended in the future by the @paritytech/release-engineering team to fully automate the release process if they choose to, similar to how it is fully automated in the Fellowship repo (https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/blob/main/.github/workflows/release.yml). The `on-chain-release` did not exist for parachains, so I added it. --- Tested on my fork: - https://github.com/liamaharon/polkadot-sdk/actions/runs/6663773523 - https://github.com/liamaharon/polkadot-sdk/releases/tag/test-6 --------- Co-authored-by: Chevdor <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]>
-
- Oct 24, 2023
-
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
Adds a config file that allows to run `zepter` without any arguments in the workspace to address all issues. A secondary workflow for the CI is provided as `zepter run check`. Both the formatting and linting are now in one check for efficiancy. The latest version also detects some more things that `featalign` was already showing. Error message [in the CI](https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/3916205) now looks like this: ```pre ... crate 'test-parachains' (/Users/vados/Documents/work/polkadot-sdk/polkadot/parachain/test-parachains/Cargo.toml) feature 'std' must propagate to: parity-scale-codec Found 55 issues (run with --fix to fix). Error: Command 'lint propagate-feature' failed with exit code 1 Polkadot-SDK uses the Zepter CLI to detect abnormalities in the feature configuration. It looks like one more more checks failed; please check the console output. You can try to automatically address them by running `zepter`. Otherwise please ask directly in the Merge Request, GitHub Discussions or on Matrix Chat, thank you. For more information, see: - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1831 - https://github.com/ggwpez/zepter ``` TODO: - [x] Check that CI fails correctly --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
-
eskimor authored
it is indeed correct. Co-authored-by: eskimor <[email protected]>
-
Tsvetomir Dimitrov authored
Splits the test in multiple cases.
-
georgepisaltu authored
Fixes #179 # Description This PR makes the structure containing identity information used in `pallet-identity` generic through the pallet `Config`. Additionally, the old structure is now available in a separate module called `simple` (pending rename) and is compatible with the new interface. Another change in this PR is that while the `additional` field in `IdentityInfo` stays for backwards compatibility reasons, the associated costs are stil present in the pallet through the `additional` function in the `IdentityInformationProvider` interface. This function is marked as deprecated as it is only a temporary solution to the backwards compatibility problem we had. In short, we could have removed the additional fields in the struct and done a migration, but we chose to wait and do it off-chain through the genesis of the system parachain. After we move the identity pallet to the parachain, additional fields will be migrated into the existing fields and the `additional` key-value store will be removed. Until that happens, this interface will provide the necessary information to properly account for the associated costs. Additionally, this PR fixes an unrelated issue; the `IdentityField` enum used to represent the fields as bitflags couldn't store more than 8 fields, even though it was marked as `#[repr(u64)]`. This was because of the `derive` implementation of `TypeInfo`, which assumed `u8` semantics. The custom implementation of this trait in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/commit/0105cc03 fixes the issue. --------- Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sam Johnson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]>
-
Kian Paimani authored
closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1882 ## Breaking Changes This PR introduces a new item to `pallet_balances::Config`: ```diff trait Config { ++ type RuntimeFreezeReasons; } ``` This value is only used to check it against `type MaxFreeze`. A similar check has been added for `MaxHolds` against `RuntimeHoldReasons`, which is already given to `pallet_balances`. In all contexts, you should pass the real `RuntimeFreezeReasons` generated by `construct_runtime` to `type RuntimeFreezeReasons`. Passing `()` would also work, but it would imply that the runtime uses no freezes at all. --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
-
- Oct 23, 2023
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
Even if the host configuration is returning `0` for the `lookahead`, we should schedule at least one job on a core if the core exists.
-
joe petrowski authored
Reverts https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1476 The `lock_pallet` / `unlock_pallet` additions in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1814 will result in less downtime for users than using runtime upgrades.
-
Branislav Kontur authored
## Problem This PR addresses the issue with testnet AssetHub builds, which was discovered during the execution of `bot bench`. https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/4038738 ``` Compiling asset-hub-rococo-runtime-wasm v1.0.0 (/builds/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/target/production/wbuild/asset-hub-rococo-runtime) warning: Linking globals named 'Core_version': symbol multiply defined! error: failed to load bitcode of module "rococo_runtime-8799ee884447805a.rococo_runtime.0bc572b8-cgu.0.rcgu.o": warning: `asset-hub-rococo-runtime-wasm` (lib) generated 1 warning error: could not compile `asset-hub-rococo-runtime-wasm` (lib) due to previous error; 1 warning emitted ``` https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/4038739 ``` Compiling asset-hub-westend-runtime-wasm v1.0.0 (/builds/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/target/production/wbuild/asset-hub-westend-runtime) warning: Linking globals named 'Core_version': symbol multiply defined! error: failed to load bitcode of module "westend_runtime-86d7844430f97d5c.westend_runtime.b7678d03-cgu.0.rcgu.o": warning: `asset-hub-westend-runtime-wasm` (lib) generated 1 warning error: could not compile `asset-hub-westend-runtime-wasm` (lib) due to previous error; 1 warning emitted ``` ## Solution - Removed dependencies on `rococo-runtime` and `westend-runtime` introduced by [this PR](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1234/files#diff-a86375df98e04ca3cce1ea35c40257a222e2d5087f5f528ff33307678b78dc2dR534-R550). - Replaced `<rococo_runtime::Treasury as PalletInfoAccess>::index()` with `rococo_runtime_constants::TREASURY_PALLET_ID`. - Added `check_treasury_pallet_id` to the relay runtimes to ensure that the constant is aligned with the pallet id. - Added "Rococo Treasury" to the waived locations (that will not be charged fees in the executor) for `BridgeHubRococo` (to be aligned with AssetHubs). ## References [Full element discussion here](https://matrix.to/#/!JUeaZUiYbdrvzvtwSL:parity.io/$2PnjYMsWRjR7M3oOfGuRI0XkjdoqJLtRcAPVcDLuLVg?via=parity.io&via=web3.foundation). --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
Bastian Köcher authored
The migration was missing to migrate `AvailabilityCores`. If this isn't migrated, all parachains in the availability phase would stall until the next session is started. This pull request fixes this by migrating this data. Besides that it is doing some cosmetics.
-
- Oct 20, 2023
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
The `xcm` crate was renamed to `staging-xcm` to be able to publish it to crates.io as someone as squatted `xcm`. The problem with this rename is that the `TypeInfo` includes the crate name which ultimately lands in the metadata. The metadata is consumed by downstream users like `polkadot-js` or people building on top of `polkadot-js`. These people are using the entire `path` to find the type in the type registry. Thus, their code would break as the type path would now be [`staging_xcm`, `VersionedXcm`] instead of [`xcm`, `VersionedXcm`]. This pull request fixes this by renaming the path segment `staging_xcm` to `xcm`. This requires: https://github.com/paritytech/scale-info/pull/197 --------- Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
-
- Oct 18, 2023
-
-
Keith Yeung authored
Combination of paritytech/polkadot#7005, its addon PR paritytech/polkadot#7585 and its companion paritytech/cumulus#2433. This PR introduces a new XcmFeesToAccount struct which implements the `FeeManager` trait, and assigns this struct as the `FeeManager` in the XCM config for all runtimes. The struct simply deposits all fees handled by the XCM executor to a specified account. In all runtimes, the specified account is configured as the treasury account. XCM __delivery__ fees are now being introduced (unless the root origin is sending a message to a system parachain on behalf of the originating chain). # Note for reviewers Most file changes are tests that had to be modified to account for the new fees. Main changes are in: - cumulus/pallets/xcmp-queue/src/lib.rs <- To make it track the delivery fees exponential factor - polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/fee_handling.rs <- Added. Has the FeeManager implementation - All runtime xcm_config files <- To add the FeeManager to the XCM configuration # Important note After this change, instructions that create and send a new XCM (Query*, Report*, ExportMessage, InitiateReserveWithdraw, InitiateTeleport, DepositReserveAsset, TransferReserveAsset, LockAsset and RequestUnlock) will require the corresponding origin account in the origin register to pay for transport delivery fees, and the onward message will fail to be sent if the origin account does not have the required amount. This delivery fee is on top of what we already collect as tx fees in pallet-xcm and XCM BuyExecution fees! Wallet UIs that want to expose the new delivery fee can do so using the formula: ``` delivery_fee_factor * (base_fee + encoded_msg_len * per_byte_fee) ``` where the delivery fee factor can be obtained from the corresponding pallet based on which transport you are using (UMP, HRMP or bridges), the base fee is a constant, the encoded message length from the message itself and the per byte fee is the same as the configured per byte fee for txs (i.e. `TransactionByteFee`). --------- Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Giles Cope <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <[email protected]>
-
joe petrowski authored
Adds descriptions needed for publishing to crates.io.
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
cumulus: add asset-hub-rococo runtime based on asset-hub-kusama and add asset-bridging support to it (#1215) This commit adds Rococo Asset Hub dedicated runtime so we can test new features here, before merging them in Kusama Asset Hub. Also adds one such feature: asset transfer over bridge (Rococo AssetHub <> Wococo AssetHub) - clone `asset-hub-kusama-runtime` -> `asset-hub-rococo-runtime` - make it use Rococo primitives, names, assets, constants, etc - add asset-transfer-over-bridge support to Rococo AssetHub <> Wococo AssetHub Fixes #1128 --------- Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
-
- Oct 17, 2023
-
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1916 Changes: - Trivially wrap the migration into a version migration to enforce idempotency. - Opinionated logging nits @liamaharon maybe we can add a check to the `try-runtime-cli` that migrations are idempotent? It should be possible to check that the storage root is identical after executing a second time (and that it does not panic like it did here
😆 ). --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
-
- Oct 16, 2023
-
-
Alejandro Martinez Andres authored
Following [polkadot#7314](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7314) and after merging https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1177 this PR solves https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1618 The following is a summary of the outcome of the migration. | Module | Total Accounts | Total stake to unlock | Total deposit to unreserve | | ------- | --------------- | --------------------- | -------------------------- | | Elections Phragmen | 27 | 1,132.821063320441 ROC | 1.465386531600 ROC | | Democracy | 69 | 2733.923509345613 ROC | 0.166666665000 ROC | | Tips | 4 | N/A | 0.015099999849 ROC | The migrations will also remove the following amount of keys 103 Democracy keys 🧹 5 Council keys 🧹 1 TechnicalCommittee keys 🧹 25 PhragmenElection keys 🧹 1 TechnicalMembership keys 🧹 9 Tips keys 🧹
-
- Oct 15, 2023
-
-
Daan van der Plas authored
The runtime code of a parachain can be replaced on the relay-chain via: [cumulus]: [enact_authorized_upgrade](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/1a38d6d6/cumulus/pallets/parachain-system/src/lib.rs#L661); this is used for a runtime upgrade when a parachain is not bricked. [polkadot] (these are used when a parachain is bricked): - [force_set_current_code](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/1a38d6d6/polkadot/runtime/parachains/src/paras/mod.rs#L823): immediately changes the runtime code of a given para without a pvf check (root). - [force_schedule_code_upgrade](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/1a38d6d6/polkadot/runtime/parachains/src/paras/mod.rs#L864): schedules a change to the runtime code of a given para including a pvf check of the new code (root). - [schedule_code_upgrade](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/1a38d6d6/polkadot/runtime/common/src/paras_registrar.rs#L395): schedules a change to the runtime code of a given para including a pvf check of the new code. Besides root, the parachain or parachain manager can call this extrinsic given that the parachain is unlocked. Polkadot signals a parachain to be ready for a runtime upgrade through the [GoAhead](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/e4949344 /polkadot/primitives/src/v5/mod.rs#L1229) signal. When in cumulus `enact_authorized_upgrade` is executed, the same underlying helper function of `force_schedule_code_upgrade` & `schedule_code_upgrade`: [schedule_code_upgrade](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/blob/09b61286da11921a3dda0a8e4015ceb9ef9cffca/runtime/parachains/src/paras/mod.rs#L1778), is called on the relay-chain, which sets the `GoAhead` signal (if the pvf is accepted). If Cumulus receives the `GoAhead` signal from polkadot without having the `PendingValidationCode` ready, it will panic ([ref](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7412)). For `enact_authorized_upgrade` we know for sure the `PendingValidationCode` is set. On the contrary, for `force_schedule_code_upgrade` & `schedule_code_upgrade` this is not the case. This PR includes a flag such that the `GoAhead` signal will only be set when a runtime upgrade is enacted by the parachain (`enact_authorized_upgrade`). additional info: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7412 Closes #641 --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
Gonçalo Pestana authored
This PR refactors the staking ledger logic to encapsulate all reads and mutations of `Ledger`, `Bonded`, `Payee` and stake locks within the `StakingLedger` struct implementation. With these changes, all the reads and mutations to the `Ledger`, `Payee` and `Bonded` storage map should be done through the methods exposed by StakingLedger to ensure the data and lock consistency of the operations. The new introduced methods that mutate and read Ledger are: - `ledger.update()`: inserts/updates a staking ledger in storage; updates staking locks accordingly (and ledger.bond(), which is synthatic sugar for ledger.update()) - `ledger.kill()`: removes all Bonded and StakingLedger related data for a given ledger; updates staking locks accordingly; `StakingLedger::get(account)`: queries both the `Bonded` and `Ledger` storages and returns a `Option<StakingLedger>`. The pallet impl exposes fn ledger(account) as synthatic sugar for `StakingLedger::get(account)`. Retrieving a ledger with `StakingLedger::get()` can be done by providing either a stash or controller account. The input must be wrapped in a `StakingAccount` variant (Stash or Controller) which is treated accordingly. This simplifies the caller API but will eventually be deprecated once we completely get rid of the controller account in staking. However, this refactor will help with the work necessary when completely removing the controller. Other goals: - No logical changes have been introduced in this PR; - No breaking changes or updates in wallets required; - No new storage items or need to perform storage migrations; - Centralise the changes to bonds and ledger updates to simplify the OnStakingUpdate updates to the target list (related to https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/443) Note: it would be great to prevent or at least raise a warning if `Ledger<T>`, `Payee<T>` and `Bonded<T>` storage types are accessed outside the `StakingLedger` implementation. This PR should not get blocked by that feature, but there's a tracking issue here https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/149 Related and step towards https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/443
-
- Oct 13, 2023
-
-
Julian Eager authored
Co-authored-by: Marcin S <[email protected]>
-
- Oct 12, 2023
-
-
Anton Vilhelm Ásgeirsson authored
# Description In a couple of cases, there were links pointing to the w3f github pages domain. In other instances, there were links pointing to the old polkadot repo's github pages. Both of these are now pointing to the relevant links in https://paritytech.github.io/polkadot-sdk/book/index.html. These changes were made specifically because the w3f github pages returns a 404, and while fixing the links, the old polkadot repo links were touched up as well even if they do redirect properly. This shouldn't affect anything as these are documentation link changes only.
-
Tsvetomir Dimitrov authored
Exposes disabled validators list via a runtime API. --------- Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]>
-
- Oct 10, 2023
-
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
Adds a warning to FRAME pallets when a function argument that starts with `_` is used in the weight formula. This is in most cases an error since the weight witness needs to be checked. Example: ```rust #[pallet::call_index(0)] #[pallet::weight(T::SystemWeightInfo::remark(_remark.len() as u32))] pub fn remark(_origin: OriginFor<T>, _remark: Vec<u8>) -> DispatchResultWithPostInfo { Ok(().into()) } ``` Produces this warning: ```pre warning: use of deprecated constant `pallet::warnings::UncheckedWeightWitness_0::_w`: It is deprecated to not check weight witness data. Please instead ensure that all witness data for weight calculation is checked before usage. For more info see: <https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1818> --> substrate/frame/system/src/lib.rs:424:40 | 424 | pub fn remark(_origin: OriginFor<T>, _remark: Vec<u8>) -> DispatchResultWithPostInfo { | ^^^^^^^ | = note: `#[warn(deprecated)]` on by default ``` Can be suppressed like this, since in this case it is legit: ```rust #[pallet::call_index(0)] #[pallet::weight(T::SystemWeightInfo::remark(remark.len() as u32))] pub fn remark(_origin: OriginFor<T>, remark: Vec<u8>) -> DispatchResultWithPostInfo { let _ = remark; // We dont need to check the weight witness. Ok(().into()) } ``` Changes: - Add warning on uncheded weight witness - Respect `subkeys` limit in `System::kill_prefix` - Fix HRMP pallet and other warnings - Update`proc_macro_warning` dependency - Delete random folder `substrate/src/src`
🙈 - Adding Prdoc --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]> -
Branislav Kontur authored
[xcm] Use `Weight::MAX` for `reserve_asset_deposited`, `receive_teleported_asset` benchmarks (#1726) # Description ## Summary Previously, the `pallet_xcm::do_reserve_transfer_assets` and `pallet_xcm::do_teleport_assets` functions relied on weight estimation for remote chain execution, which was based on guesswork derived from the local chain. This approach led to complications for runtimes that did not provide or support specific [XCM configurations](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76/polkadot/xcm/xcm-executor/src/config.rs#L43-L47) for `IsReserve` or `IsTeleporter`. Consequently, such runtimes had to resort to implementing hard-coded weights for XCM instructions like `reserve_asset_deposited` or `receive_teleported_asset` to support extrinsics such as `pallet_xcm::reserve_transfer_assets` and `pallet_xcm::teleport_assets`, which depended on remote weight estimation. The issue of remote weight estimation was addressed and resolved by [Pull Request #1645](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1645), which removed the need for remote weight estimation. ## Solution As a continuation of this improvement, the current PR proposes further cleanup by removing unnecessary hard-coded values and rectifying benchmark results with `Weight::MAX` that previously used `T::BlockWeights::get().max_block` as an override for unsupported XCM instructions like `ReserveAssetDeposited` and `ReceiveTeleportedAsset`. ## Questions - [x] Can we remove now also `Hardcoded till the XCM pallet is fixed` for `deposit_asset`? E.g. for AssetHubKusama [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76/cumulus/parachains/runtimes/assets/asset-hub-kusama/src/weights/xcm/mod.rs#L129-L134) - [x] Are comments like [this](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76/polkadot/runtime/kusama/src/weights/xcm/mod.rs#L94) `// Kusama doesn't support ReserveAssetDeposited, so this benchmark has a default weight` still relevant? Shouldnt be removed/changed? ## TODO - [x] `bench bot` regenerate xcm weights for all runtimes - [x] remove hard-coded stuff from system parachain weight files - [ ] when merged, open `polkadot-fellow/runtimes` PR ## References Fixes #1132 Closes #1132 Old polkadot repo [PR](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7546) --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Oct 07, 2023
-
-
Muharem Ismailov authored
### Summary This PR introduces new dispatchables to the treasury pallet, allowing spends of various asset types. The enhanced features of the treasury pallet, in conjunction with the asset-rate pallet, are set up and enabled for Westend and Rococo. ### Westend and Rococo runtimes. Polkadot/Kusams/Rococo Treasury can accept proposals for `spends` of various asset kinds by specifying the asset's location and ID. #### Treasury Instance New Dispatchables: - `spend(AssetKind, AssetBalance, Beneficiary, Option<ValidFrom>)` - propose and approve a spend; - `payout(SpendIndex)` - payout an approved spend or retry a failed payout - `check_payment(SpendIndex)` - check the status of a payout; - `void_spend(SpendIndex)` - void previously approved spend; > existing spend dispatchable renamed to spend_local in this context, the `AssetKind` parameter contains the asset's location and it's corresponding `asset_id`, for example: `USDT` on `AssetHub`, ``` rust location = MultiLocation(0, X1(Parachain(1000))) asset_id = MultiLocation(0, X2(PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984))) ``` the `Beneficiary` parameter is a `MultiLocation` in the context of the asset's location, for example ``` rust // the Fellowship salary pallet's location / account FellowshipSalaryPallet = MultiLocation(1, X2(Parachain(1001), PalletInstance(64))) // or custom `AccountId` Alice = MultiLocation(0, AccountId32(network: None, id: [1,...])) ``` the `AssetBalance` represents the amount of the `AssetKind` to be transferred to the `Beneficiary`. For permission checks, the asset amount is converted to the native amount and compared against the maximum spendable amount determined by the commanding spend origin. the `spend` dispatchable allows for batching spends with different `ValidFrom` arguments, enabling milestone-based spending. If the expectations tied to an approved spend are not met, it is possible to void the spend later using the `void_spend` dispatchable. Asset Rate Pallet provides the conversion rate from the `AssetKind` to the native balance. #### Asset Rate Instance Dispatchables: - `create(AssetKind, Rate)` - initialize a conversion rate to the native balance for the given asset - `update(AssetKind, Rate)` - update the conversion rate to the native balance for the given asset - `remove(AssetKind)` - remove an existing conversion rate to the native balance for the given asset the pallet's dispatchables can be executed by the Root or Treasurer origins. ### Treasury Pallet Treasury Pallet can accept proposals for `spends` of various asset kinds and pay them out through the implementation of the `Pay` trait. New Dispatchables: - `spend(Config::AssetKind, AssetBalance, Config::Beneficiary, Option<ValidFrom>)` - propose and approve a spend; - `payout(SpendIndex)` - payout an approved spend or retry a failed payout; - `check_payment(SpendIndex)` - check the status of a payout; - `void_spend(SpendIndex)` - void previously approved spend; > existing spend dispatchable renamed to spend_local The parameters' types of the `spend` dispatchable exposed via the pallet's `Config` and allows to propose and accept a spend of a certain amount. An approved spend can be claimed via the `payout` within the `Config::SpendPeriod`. Clients provide an implementation of the `Pay` trait which can pay an asset of the `AssetKind` to the `Beneficiary` in `AssetBalance` units. The implementation of the Pay trait might not have an immediate final payment status, for example if implemented over `XCM` and the actual transfer happens on a remote chain. The `check_status` dispatchable can be executed to update the spend's payment state and retry the `payout` if the payment has failed. --------- Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Oct 01, 2023
-
-
Piet authored
What does this PR do? - Introduced the TotalValueLocked storage for nomination-pools. - introduced a slashing api in mock.rs - additional test for tracking a slashing event towards a pool without sub-pools - migration for the nomination-pools (V6 to V7) with `VersionedMigration` Why are these changes needed? this is the continuation of the work by @Kianenigma in this [PR](https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/13319) How were these changes implemented and what do they affect? - It's an extra StorageValue that's modified whenever funds flow in or out of staking for any of the `bonded_account` of `BondedPools` - The `PoolSlashed`event is now emitted even when no `SubPools` are found Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/155 KSM: HHEEgVzcqL3kCXgsxSfJMbsTy8dxoTctuXtpY94n4s8F4pS --------- Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ankan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ankan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Sep 29, 2023
-
-
Ankan authored
closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/158. partially addresses https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/226. Instead of fragile calculation of current balance by looking at `free balance - ED`, Nomination Pool now freezes ED in the pool reward account to restrict an account from going below minimum balance. This also has a nice side effect that if ED changes, we know how much is the imbalance in ED frozen in the pool and the current required ED. A pool operator can diligently top up the pool with the deficit in ED or vice versa, withdraw the excess they transferred to the pool. ## Notable changes - New call `adjust_pool_deposit`: Allows to top up the deficit or withdraw the excess deposited funds to the pool. - Uses Fungible trait (instead of Currency trait). Since NP was not doing any locking/reserving previously, no migration is needed for this. - One time migration of freezing ED from each of the existing pools (not very PoV friendly but fine for relay chain).
-
Bastian Köcher authored
This pull request is removing the Kusama and Polkadot runtime crates. As still some crates dependent on the runtime crates, this pull request is doing some more changes. - It removes the `hostperfcheck` CLI command. This CLI command could compare the current node against the standard hardware by doing some checks. Later we added the hardware benchmark feature to Substrate. This hardware benchmark is running on every node startup and prints a warning if the current node is too slow. This makes this CLI command a duplicate that was also depending on the kusama runtime. - The pull request is removing the emulated integration tests that were requiring the Kusama or Polkadot runtime crates.
-
- Sep 28, 2023
-
-
Michal Kucharczyk authored
[`RococoGenesisExt`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/a414ea75 /polkadot/node/service/src/chain_spec.rs#L152-L171) is removed. It was the hack to allow overwriting `EpochDurationInBlocks`. Removal of `RococGenesisExt` prevents from manipulating the state to change the runtime constants. Changes: - Environment variable which controls the `time::EpochDurationInBlocks` value was added: `ROCOCO_EPOCH_DURATION` (epoch duration will be set to the value of env), - `10,100,600` versions of rococo-runtime are built in CI and put into `polkadot-debug` docker image. `rococo-runtime` building examples: - to build runtime for `versi_staging_testnet` which had EpochDurationInBlocks set to 100: ``` ROCOCO_EPOCH_DURATION=100 cargo build --features=fast-runtime -p rococo-runtime ``` - to build runtime for `wococo_development` ``` ROCOCO_EPOCH_DURATION=10 cargo build --features=fast-runtime -p rococo-runtime ``` - to build `versi-staging` chain spec: ``` ROCOCO_EPOCH_DURATION=100 cargo run -p polkadot --features=fast-runtime -- build-spec --chain versi-staging --raw ``` - to build `wococo-dev` chain spec: ``` ROCOCO_EPOCH_DURATION=10 cargo run -p polkadot --features=fast-runtime -- build-spec --chain wococo-dev --raw ``` It is also possible to change the epoch duration by replacing the `code` field in the chain spec with the hex dump of pre-built runtime wasm blob (because the epoch duration is hard-coded into wasm blob). --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
Dónal Murray authored
Update the HRMP pallet to use field names for Event variants to improve metadata for a better client experience. Event variants are now structs instead of unnamed tuples. Partially implements Substrate issue [9903](https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/issues/9903) which doesn't appear to have been moved to the monorepo.
-
- Sep 27, 2023
-
-
Alejandro Martinez Andres authored
Migrating [PR from the archived polkadot repo](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7272) As per https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7272#issuecomment-1559240466, the changes in this MR include the following pallets into [x] Rococo and [x] Westend runtimes: pallet_conviction_voting pallet_referenda pallet_ranked_collective pallet_custom_origins pallet_whitelist And only for westend-runtime: pallet_treasury Following [Kusama runtime config](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/tree/dbae30efe080a1d41fe54ef4da8af47614c9ca93/runtime/kusama/src) as a baseline. Benchmarking of the following pallets done for both Rococo and Westend: pallet_conviction_voting pallet_referenda pallet_ranked_collective (only on Rococo) pallet_whitelist And only for Westend: pallet_treasury Removed Gov1 from Rococo as in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6701 Rococo Gov1 storage will be cleaned in a different PR - [issue ](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1618) --------- Co-authored-by: Giles Cope <[email protected]>
-
Chris Sosnin authored
- Async-backing related primitives are stable `primitives::v6` - Async-backing API is now part of `api_version(7)` - It's enabled on Rococo and Westend runtimes --------- Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>
-
Michal Kucharczyk authored
This PR implements [`GenesisBuilder` API](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/a414ea75 /substrate/primitives/genesis-builder/src/lib.rs#L38) for all the runtimes in polkadot repo. Step towards: paritytech/polkadot-sdk#25 --------- Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]>
-
- Sep 22, 2023
-
-
Dónal Murray authored
Updates the HRMP pallet benchmarks to Benchmarks v2 and fixes a small misconfiguration in one benchmark. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Sep 20, 2023
-
-
joe petrowski authored
This PR filters calls from the Identity pallet from all Relay Chain runtimes as preparation to move the identity state and logic to a system parachain within each network. After this change is deployed to a runtime, no more changes such as adding new sub-identities will be possible. The frozen state will be part of the genesis state of the system chain. After the system chain launches, the pallet and all state will be removed from each Relay Chain. Applications and UIs that render display information from this pallet will need to read from the system chain when it launches.
-
- Sep 19, 2023
-
-
Xiliang Chen authored
The goal is to allow Fellowship on Collective chain to have a sovereign account on Polkadot so that we can add it as an identity registrar. This will allow Fellows origin to be able to provide judgements for Fellowship members. This currently allow any body on any parachain including non system parachains to have sovereign account. I cannot think of any reason why that may be an issue but let me know if I should change it to filter only system parachains. [This](https://gist.github.com/xlc/ec61bfa4e9f6d62da27d30141ad2c72b) is the testing script. Original PR: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7518
-
joe petrowski authored
Solution to establish HRMP channels between system parachains. --------- Co-authored-by: Muharem Ismailov <[email protected]>
-
- Sep 18, 2023
-
-
Gonçalo Pestana authored
**Note**: This is a lift-and-shift PR from the old substrate and polkadot repos, both PRs have been reviewed and audited (https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/13983, https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7140) --- This PR implements a generic `BaseDeposit` calculation for signed submissions, based on the size of the submission queue. It adds a new associated type to EPM's config, `type SignedDepositBase`, that implements `Convert<usize, BalanceOf<T>>`, which is used to calculate the base deposit for signed submissions based on the size of the signed submissions queue. `struct GeometricDepositBase<Balance, Fixed, Inc>` implements the convert trait so that the deposit value increases as a geometric progression. The deposit base is calculated by `deposit_base = fixed_deposit_base * (1 + increase_factor)^n`, where `n` is the term of the progression (i.e. the number of signed submissions in the queue). `Fixed` and `Inc` generic params are getters for `Balance` and `IncreaseFactor` to compute the geometric progression. If `IncreaseFactor = 0`, then the signed deposit is constant and equal to `Fixed` regardless of the size of the queue. ### Runtime configs In Kusama, the progression with 10% increase without changing the current signed fixed deposit is: (term == size of the queue) Term 1: `1,333,333,332,000` Term 2: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10 = 1,466,666,665,200` Term 3: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^2 = 1,613,333,331,200` Term 4: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^3 = 1,774,666,664,320` Term 5: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^4 = 1,952,133,330,752` Term 6: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^5 = 2,147,346,663,827.20` Term 7: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^6 = 2,362,081,330,210.92` Term 8: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^7 = 2,598,289,463,231.01` Term 9: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^8 = 2,858,118,409,554.11` Term 10: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^9 = 3,143,930,250,509.52` Westend: Term 1: `2,000,000,000,000` Term 2: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10 = 2,200,000,000,000` Term 3: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^2 = 2,420,000,000,000` Term 4: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^3 = 2,662,000,000,000` Term 5: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^4 = 2,928,200,000,000` Term 6: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^5 = 3,221,020,000,000` Term 7: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^6 = 3,543,122,000,000` Term 8: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^7 = 3,897,434,200,000` Term 9: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^8 = 4,287,177,620,000` Term 10: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^9 = 4,715,895,382,000` and in Polkadot, the deposit increase is disabled in the current state of the PR, as the increase factor is 0% -- so nothing changes from the current behaviour. Closes https://github.com/paritytech-secops/srlabs_findings/issues/189
-
Branislav Kontur authored
## Summary The term "common good parachain" has been abandoned in favor of "system parachain" - e.g. [Joe's speech at Decoded2023](https://youtu.be/CSO-ERHK2gY?t=456). This pull request tries to fix and align code with this vision. ## Impact The important change is implementation of `trait IsSystem` for `Id` [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1406/files#diff-0b7b4f5b962a18ce980354592b55ab2a27b5a2e9f6f8089ec803ca73853e8583R225-R229) where we changed condition from `< 1000` to `<= 1999`, which means that all parachain IDs bellow 1999 (included) are considered as "system parachain" IDs. This change has a direct impact on the following components: #### [ChildSystemParachainAsSuperuser](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/origin_conversion.rs#L72-L88) This origin converter is used for allowing to process XCM `Transact` from "system parachain" on the relay chain - e.g. see [configuration for Kusama](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/polkadot/runtime/kusama/src/xcm_config.rs#L92-L101). Only configured for Kusama, Westend, Rococo runtimes. **No need for this feature anymore.** See [comment](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1406#issuecomment-1708218715). #### [IsChildSystemParachain](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/barriers.rs#L310-L317) `IsChildSystemParachain` is used with `AllowExplicitUnpaidExecutionFrom` barrier for checking XCM programs (they have to start with `UnpaidExecution` instruction). Only configured for Kusama, Westend, Rococo runtimes. **Overall the impact is low or mostly ok because it only allows unpaid execution for "system parachains" (e.g. AssetHub, BridgeHub...) on the relay chain.** #### [SiblingSystemParachainAsSuperuser](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/origin_conversion.rs#L94-L114) Not used anywhere in `polkadot-sdk` repo. ## Unresolved Questions - [ ] constants `LOWEST_USER_ID` and `LOWEST_PUBLIC_ID` seem to express the same thing now, do we want to keep them both or deprecated one of them? If so, which one? - [x] determine impact for `ChildSystemParachainAsSuperuser` ## TODO - [ ] when merged here, open PR to the `polkadot-fellows` ## Related Material https://youtu.be/CSO-ERHK2gY?t=456 https://forum.polkadot.network/t/polkadot-protocol-and-common-good-parachains/866 https://wiki.polkadot.network/docs/learn-system-chains
-