This PR allows _username authorities_ to issue unique usernames that
correspond with an account. It also provides two-way lookup, that is
from `AccountId` to a single, "primary" `Username` (alongside
`Registration`) and multiple unique `Username`s to an `AccountId`.

Key features:

- Username Authorities added (and removed) via privileged origin.
- Authorities have a `suffix` and an `allocation`. They can grant up to
`allocation` usernames. Their `suffix` will be appended to the usernames
that they issue. A suffix may be up to 7 characters long.
- Users can ask an authority to grant them a username. This will take
the form `myusername.suffix`. The entire name (including suffix) must be
less than or equal to 32 alphanumeric characters.
- Users can approve a username for themselves in one of two ways (that
is, authorities cannot grant them arbitrarily):
- Pre-sign the entire username (including suffix) with a secret key that
corresponds to their `AccountId` (for keyed accounts, obviously); or
- Accept the username after it has been granted by an authority (it will
be queued until accepted) (for non-keyed accounts like pure proxies or
multisigs).
- The system does not require any funds or deposits. Users without an
identity will be given a default one (presumably all fields set to
`None`). If they update this info, they will need to place the normal
storage deposit.
- If a user does not have any username, their first one will be set as
`Primary`, and their `AccountId` will map to that one. If they get
subsequent usernames, they can choose which one to be their primary via
`set_primary_username`.
- There are some state cleanup functions to remove expired usernames
that have not been accepted and dangling usernames whose owners have
called `clear_identity`.

TODO:

- [x] Add migration to runtimes
- [x] Probably do off-chain migration into People Chain genesis
- [x] Address a few TODO questions in code (please review)

---------

Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]>

Related to https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2787

Adding BEEFY support to the kitchensink chain in order to be able to
extend the current warp sync zombienet tests with BEEFY enabled

Also fixes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1417

- [x] CoreIndex -> AssignmentProvider mapping will be able to change any
time.
- [x] Implement
- [x] Provide Migrations
- [x] Add and fix tests
- [x] Implement bulk assigner logic
- [x] bulk assigner tests
- [x] Port over current assigner to use bulk designer (+ share on-demand
with bulk): top-level assigner has core ranges: legacy, bulk
- [x] Adjust migrations to reflect new assigner structure
- [x] Move migration code to Assignment code directly and make it
recursive (make it possible to skip releases) -> follow up ticket.
- [x] Test migrations
- [x] Add migration PR to runtimes repo -> follow up ticket.
- [x] Wire up with actual UMP messages
- [x] Write PR docs

---------

Co-authored-by: eskimor <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Bradley Olson <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: BradleyOlson64 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Anton Vilhelm Ásgeirsson <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: antonva <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Marcin S. <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

closes https://github.com/paritytech-secops/srlabs_findings/issues/78.

Removes `BetterUnsignedThreshold` from pallet EPM. This will essentially
mean any solution submitted by the validator that is strictly better
than the current queued solution would be accepted.

The reason for having these thresholds is to limit number of solutions
submitted on-chain. However for unsigned submissions, the number of
solutions that could be submitted on average is limited even without
thresholding (calculation shown in the corresponding issue).

This PR backports `transaction_version` bump from `1.5.0` release back
to `master`

Initial implementation for the plan discussed here: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/701
Built on top of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1178
v0: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7554,

## Overall idea

When approval-voting checks a candidate and is ready to advertise the
approval, defer it in a per-relay chain block until we either have
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT candidates to sign or a candidate has stayed
MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS in the queue, in both cases we sign what
candidates we have available.

This should allow us to reduce the number of approvals messages we have
to create/send/verify. The parameters are configurable, so we should
find some values that balance:

- Security of the network: Delaying broadcasting of an approval
shouldn't but the finality at risk and to make sure that never happens
we won't delay sending a vote if we are past 2/3 from the no-show time.
- Scalability of the network: MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT = 1 &
MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS =0, is what we have now and we know from
the measurements we did on versi, it bottlenecks
approval-distribution/approval-voting when increase significantly the
number of validators and parachains
- Block storage: In case of disputes we have to import this votes on
chain and that increase the necessary storage with
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT * CandidateHash per vote. Given that
disputes are not the normal way of the network functioning and we will
limit MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT in the single digits numbers, this
should be good enough. Alternatively, we could try to create a better
way to store this on-chain through indirection, if that's needed.

## Other fixes:
- Fixed the fact that we were sending random assignments to
non-validators, that was wrong because those won't do anything with it
and they won't gossip it either because they do not have a grid topology
set, so we would waste the random assignments.
- Added metrics to be able to debug potential no-shows and
mis-processing of approvals/assignments.

## TODO:
- [x] Get feedback, that this is moving in the right direction. @ordian
@sandreim @eskimor

 @burdges, let me know what you think.
- [x] More and more testing.
- [x]  Test in versi.
- [x] Make MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT &
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_WAIT_MILLIS a parachain host configuration.
- [x] Make sure the backwards compatibility works correctly
- [x] Make sure this direction is compatible with other streams of work:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/635 &
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/742
- [x] Final versi burn-in before merging

---------

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>

This PR introduces a script and some templates to use the prdoc involved
in a release and build:
- the changelog
- a simple draft of audience documentation

Since the prdoc presence was enforced in the middle of the version
1.5.0, not all PRs did come with a `prdoc` file.
This PR creates all the missing `prdoc` files with some minimum content
allowing to properly generate the changelog.
The generated content is **not** suitable for the audience
documentation.

The audience documentation will be possible with the next version, when
all PR come with a proper `prdoc`.

## Assumptions

- the prdoc files for release `vX.Y.Z` have been moved under
`prdoc/X.Y.Z`
- the changelog requires for now for the prdoc files to contain author +
topic. Thos fields are optional.

The build script can  be called as:
```
VERSION=X.Y.Z ./scripts/release/build-changelogs.sh
```

Related:
-  #1408

---------

Co-authored-by: EgorPopelyaev <[email protected]>

Partially Addresses #2500

Adds a `deprecate_controller_batch` call to the staking pallet that is
callable by `Root` and `StakingAdmin`. To be used for controller account
deprecation and removed thereafter. Adds
`MaxControllersDeprecationBatch` pallet constant that defines max
possible deprecations per call.

- [x] Add `deprecate_controller_batch` call, and
`MaxControllersInDeprecationBatch` constant.
- [x] Add tests, benchmark, weights. Tests that weight is only consumed
if unique pair.
- [x] Adds `StakingAdmin` origin to staking's `AdminOrigin` type in
westend runtime.
- [x] Determined that worst case 5,900 deprecations does fit into
`maxBlock` `proofSize` and `refTime` in both normal and operational
thresholds, meaning we can deprecate all controllers for each network in
one call.

## Block Weights

By querying `consts.system.blockWeights` we can see that the
`deprecate_controller_batch` weights fit within the `normal` threshold
on Polkadot.

#### `controller_deprecation_batch` where i = 5900:
#### Ref time: 69,933,325,300
#### Proof size: 21,040,390

### Polkadot 

```
// consts.query.blockWeights

maxBlock: {
        refTime: 2,000,000,000,000
        proofSize: 18,446,744,073,709,551,615
}
normal: {
 maxExtrinsic: {
	refTime: 1,479,873,955,000
	proofSize: 13,650,590,614,545,068,195
 }
 maxTotal: {
	refTime: 1,500,000,000,000
	proofSize: 13,835,058,055,282,163,711
 }
}
```

### Kusama

```
// consts.query.blockWeights

  maxBlock: {
    refTime: 2,000,000,000,000
    proofSize: 18,446,744,073,709,551,615
  }
    normal: {
      maxExtrinsic: {
        refTime: 1,479,875,294,000
        proofSize: 13,650,590,614,545,068,195
      }
      maxTotal: {
        refTime: 1,500,000,000,000
        proofSize: 13,835,058,055,282,163,711
      }
}
```

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <[email protected]>

This PR makes the block number provider configurable through the Config
trait in pallet-vesting, this gives parachains the option to use the
relay chain block number provider from ParachainSystem.

---------

Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>

Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2641

# Motivation (+testing)

### Enable easy `ForeignAssets` transfers using `pallet-xcm` 

We had just previously added capabilities to teleport fees during
reserve-based transfers, but what about reserve-transferring fees when
needing to teleport some non-fee asset?

This PR aligns everything under either explicit reserve-transfer,
explicit teleport, or this new flexible `transfer_assets()` which can
mix and match as needed with fewer artificial constraints imposed to the
user.

This will enable, for example, a (non-system) parachain to teleport
their `ForeignAssets` assets to AssetHub while using DOT to pay fees.
(the assets are teleported - as foreign assets should from their owner
chain - while DOT used for fees can only be reserve-based transferred
between said parachain and AssetHub).

Added `xcm-emulator` tests for this scenario ^.

# Description

Reverts `(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets` to only allow reserve-based
transfers for all `assets` including fees.

Similarly `(limited_)teleport_assets` only allows teleports for all
`assets` including fees.
    
For complex combinations of asset transfers where assets and fees may
have different reserves or different reserve/teleport trust
configurations, users can use the newly added `transfer_assets()`
extrinsic which is more flexible in allowing more complex scenarios.

`assets` (excluding `fees`) must have same reserve location or otherwise
be teleportable to `dest`.
No limitations imposed on `fees`.

- for local reserve: transfer assets to sovereign account of destination
chain and forward a notification XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit
reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`.
- for destination reserve: burn local assets and forward a notification
to `dest` chain to withdraw the reserve assets from this chain's
sovereign account and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
- for remote reserve: burn local assets, forward XCM to reserve chain to
move reserves from this chain's SA to `dest` chain's SA, and forward
another XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to
`beneficiary`.
- for teleports: burn local assets and forward XCM to `dest` chain to
mint/teleport assets and deposit them to `beneficiary`.

## Review notes

Only around 500 lines are prod code (see `pallet_xcm/src/lib.rs`), the
rest of the PR is new tests and improving existing tests.

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

The `BlockNumber` and `Hash` are fixed types any way.

Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Vladimir Istyufeev <[email protected]>

Addresses #409.

This request has been raised by multiple community members - the ability
for the nomination pool root role to configure permissionless commission
claiming:

> Would it be possible to have a claim_commission_other extrinsic for
claiming commission of nomination pools permissionless?

This PR does not quite introduce this additional call, but amends
`do_claim_commission` to check a new `claim_permission` field in the
`Commission` struct, configured by an enum:

```
enum CommissionClaimPermission {
   Permissionless,
   Account(AccountId),
}
```
This can be optionally set in a bonded pool's
`commission.claim_permission` field:

```
struct BondedPool {
   commission: {
      <snip>
      claim_permission: Option<CommissionClaimPermission<T::AccountId>>,
   },
   <snip>
}
```

This is a new field and requires a migration to add it to existing
pools. This will be `None` on pool creation, falling back to the `root`
role having sole access to claim commission if it is not set; this is
the behaviour as it is today. Once set, the field _can_ be set to `None`
again.

#### Changes
- [x] Add `commision.claim_permission` field.
- [x] Add `can_claim_commission` and amend `do_claim_commission`.
- [x] Add `set_commission_claim_permission` call.
- [x] Test to cover new configs and call.
- [x] Add and amend benchmarks.
- [x] Generate new weights + slot into call
`set_commission_claim_permission`.
- [x] Add migration to introduce `commission.claim_permission`, bump
storage version.
- [x] Update Westend weights.
- [x] Migration working.

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

## Overview

This PR aligns the `spec_version` formatting to the [recent
changes](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/26/files#diff-efa4caeb17487ecb13d8f5eb7863c3241d84afa2e73fbf25909a2ca89df0f362R142)
made for the Polkadot/Kusama runtimes.

It also backports the latest version `v1.4.0` bumps as `1_004_000`.

## Details

During the switch from `v0.9` to `v1.x`, the format of the
`spec_version` was modified from: `(M)m_ppp` for a runtime considered on
version `M.m.pp`. For instance `0.9.42` had a `spec_version` of `9420`.

With the transition to `v1.x`, the format was changed to a bigger number
(still `u32`) formatted as `MM_mm_ppp` where `1.2.3` would be stored as
`01_02_003`.

This PR aligns the format with that has been introduced in the
fellowship repo: `MMM_mmm_ppp`.

---------

Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>

The versioned migrations are already there in pallet nomination-pools:

https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/f6ee4781/substrate/frame/nomination-pools/src/migration.rs#L27-L48

Just updating the kitchensink runtime to point to them.

This is also nice because it points the dev to an example of how to use
`VersionedMigration`.

Missed in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1672

Westend now successfully updated to `spec: 103000`, we **have to
remove** the session keys migration before the next release as it
doesn't gracefully handle reapplying it.

The goal of this PR is to migrate Identity deposits from the Relay Chain
to a system parachain.

The problem I want to solve is that `IdentityOf` and `SubsOf` both store
an amount that's held in reserve as a storage deposit. When migrating to
a parachain, we can take a snapshot of the actual `IdentityInfo` and
sub-account mappings, but should migrate (off chain) the `deposit`s to
zero, since the chain (and by extension, accounts) won't have any funds
at genesis.

The good news is that we expect parachain deposits to be significantly
lower (possibly 100x) on the parachain. That is, a deposit of 21 DOT on
the Relay Chain would need 0.21 DOT on a parachain. This PR proposes to
migrate the deposits in the following way:

1. Introduces a new pallet with two extrinsics: 
- `reap_identity`: Has a configurable `ReapOrigin`, which would be set
to `EnsureSigned` on the Relay Chain (i.e. callable by anyone) and
`EnsureRoot` on the parachain (we don't want identities reaped from
there).
- `poke_deposit`: Checks what deposit the pallet holds (at genesis,
zero) and attempts to update the amount based on the calculated deposit
for storage data.
2. `reap_identity` clears all storage data for a `target` account and
unreserves their deposit.
3. A `ReapIdentityHandler` teleports the necessary DOT to the parachain
and calls `poke_deposit`. Since the parachain deposit is much lower, and
was just unreserved, we know we have enough.

One awkwardness I ran into was that the XCMv3 instruction set does not
provide a way for the system to teleport assets without a fee being
deducted on reception. Users shouldn't have to pay a fee for the system
to migrate their info to a more efficient location. So I wrote my own
program and did the `InitiateTeleport` accounting on my own to send a
program with `UnpaidExecution`. Have discussed an
`InitiateUnpaidTeleport` instruction with @franciscoaguirre

 . Obviously
any chain executing this would have to pass a `Barrier` for free
execution.

TODO:

- [x] Confirm People Chain ParaId
- [x] Confirm People Chain deposit rates (determined in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2281)
- [x] Add pallet to Westend

---------

Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>

Adds a `NodeFeatures` bitfield value to the runtime `HostConfiguration`,
with the purpose of coordinating the enabling of node-side features,
such as: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/628 and
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/598.
These are features that require all validators enable them at the same
time, assuming all/most nodes have upgraded their node versions.

This PR doesn't add any feature yet. These are coming in future PRs.

Also adds a runtime API for querying the state of the client features
and an extrinsic for setting/unsetting a feature by its index in the bitfield.

Note: originally part of:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1644, but posted as
standalone to be reused by other PRs until the initial PR is merged

## Motivation

`pallet-xcm` is the main user-facing interface for XCM functionality,
including assets manipulation functions like `teleportAssets()` and
`reserve_transfer_assets()` calls.

While `teleportAsset()` works both ways, `reserve_transfer_assets()`
works only for sending reserve-based assets to a remote destination and
beneficiary when the reserve is the _local chain_.

## Solution

This PR enhances `pallet_xcm::(limited_)reserve_withdraw_assets` to
support transfers when reserves are other chains.
This will allow complete, **bi-directional** reserve-based asset
transfers user stories using `pallet-xcm`.

Enables following scenarios:
- transferring assets with local reserve (was previously supported iff
asset used as fee also had local reserve - now it works in all cases),
- transferring assets with reserve on destination,
- transferring assets with reserve on remote/third-party chain (iff
assets and fees have same remote reserve),
- transferring assets with reserve different than the reserve of the
asset to be used as fees - meaning can be used to transfer random asset
with local/dest reserve while using DOT for fees on all involved chains,
even if DOT local/dest reserve doesn't match asset reserve,
- transferring assets with any type of local/dest reserve while using
fees which can be teleported between involved chains.

All of the above is done by pallet inner logic without the user having
to specify which scenario/reserves/teleports/etc. The correct scenario
and corresponding XCM programs are identified, and respectively, built
automatically based on runtime configuration of trusted teleporters and
trusted reserves.

#### Current limitations:
- while `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CAN have different reserves (or
fees CAN be teleported), the remaining "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT, among
themselves, have different reserve locations (this is also implicitly
enforced by `MAX_ASSETS_FOR_TRANSFER=2`, but this can be safely
increased in the future).
- `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT have **different remote**
reserves (this could also be supported in the future, but adds even more
complexity while possibly not being worth it - we'll see what the future
holds).

Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1584
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2055

---------

Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>

Remove the `GRANDPA_AUTHORITIES_KEY` key and its usage. Apparently this
was used in the early days to communicate the grandpa authorities to the
node. However, we have now a runtime api that does this for us. So, this
pull request is moving from the custom managed storage item to a FRAME
managed storage item.

This pr also includes a migration for doing the switch on a running
chain.

---------

Co-authored-by: Davide Galassi <[email protected]>

As suggested by @ggwpez
(https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2142#discussion_r1388145872),
remove the `VersionChecked` prefix from version checked migrations (but
leave `VersionUnchecked` prefixes)

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

This PR is a follow up to #1661 

- [x] rename the `simple` module to `legacy`
- [x] fix benchmarks to disregard the number of additional fields
- [x] change the storage deposits to charge per encoded byte of the
identity information instance, removing the need for `fn
additional(&self) -> usize` in `IdentityInformationProvider`
- [x] ~add an extrinsic to rejig deposits to account for the change
above~
- [ ] ~ensure through proper configuration that the new byte-based
deposit is always lower than whatever is reserved now~
- [x] remove `IdentityFields` from the `set_fields` extrinsic signature,
as per [this
discussion](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1661#discussion_r1371703403)

> ensure through proper configuration that the new byte-based deposit is
always lower than whatever is reserved now

Not sure this is needed anymore. If the new deposits are higher than
what is currently on chain and users don't have enough funds to reserve
what is needed, the extrinisc fails and they're basically grandfathered
and frozen until they add more funds and/or make a change to their
identity. This behavior seems fine to me. Original idea
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1661#issuecomment-1779606319).

> add an extrinsic to rejig deposits to account for the change above

This was initially implemented but now removed from this PR in favor of
the implementation detailed
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2088).

---------

Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: joepetrowski <[email protected]>

helps https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/439.
closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/473.

PR link in the older substrate repository:
https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/13498.

# Context
Rewards payout is processed today in a single block and limited to
`MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator`. This number is currently 512 on both
Kusama and Polkadot.

This PR tries to scale the nominators payout to an unlimited count in a
multi-block fashion. Exposures are stored in pages, with each page
capped to a certain number (`MaxExposurePageSize`). Starting out, this
number would be the same as `MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator`, but
eventually, this number can be lowered through new runtime upgrades to
limit the rewardeable nominators per dispatched call instruction.

The changes in the PR are backward compatible.

## How payouts would work like after this change
Staking exposes two calls, 1) the existing `payout_stakers` and 2)
`payout_stakers_by_page`.

### payout_stakers
This remains backward compatible with no signature change. If for a
given era a validator has multiple pages, they can call `payout_stakers`
multiple times. The pages are executed in an ascending sequence and the
runtime takes care of preventing double claims.

### payout_stakers_by_page
Very similar to `payout_stakers` but also accepts an extra param
`page_index`. An account can choose to payout rewards only for an
explicitly passed `page_index`.

**Lets look at an example scenario**
Given an active validator on Kusama had 1100 nominators,
`MaxExposurePageSize` set to 512 for Era e. In order to pay out rewards
to all nominators, the caller would need to call `payout_stakers` 3
times.

- `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the first 512
nominators.
- `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the second set of 512
nominators.
- `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the last set of 76
nominators.
...
- `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => calling it the 4th time would
return an error `InvalidPage`.

The above calls can also be replaced by `payout_stakers_by_page` and
passing a `page_index` explicitly.

## Commission note
Validator commission is paid out in chunks across all the pages where
each commission chunk is proportional to the total stake of the current
page. This implies higher the total stake of a page, higher will be the
commission. If all the pages of a validator's single era are paid out,
the sum of commission paid to the validator across all pages should be
equal to what the commission would have been if we had a non-paged
exposure.

### Migration Note
Strictly speaking, we did not need to bump our storage version since
there is no migration of storage in this PR. But it is still useful to
mark a storage upgrade for the following reasons:

- New storage items are introduced in this PR while some older storage
items are deprecated.
- For the next `HistoryDepth` eras, the exposure would be incrementally
migrated to its corresponding paged storage item.
- Runtimes using staking pallet would strictly need to wait at least
`HistoryDepth` eras with current upgraded version (14) for the migration
to complete. At some era `E` such that `E >
era_at_which_V14_gets_into_effect + HistoryDepth`, we will upgrade to
version X which will remove the deprecated storage items.
In other words, it is a strict requirement that E<sub>x</sub> -
E<sub>14</sub> > `HistoryDepth`, where
E<sub>x</sub> = Era at which deprecated storages are removed from
runtime,
E<sub>14</sub> = Era at which runtime is upgraded to version 14.
- For Polkadot and Kusama, there is a [tracker
ticket](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/433) to clean
up the deprecated storage items.

### Storage Changes

#### Added
- ErasStakersOverview
- ClaimedRewards
- ErasStakersPaged

#### Deprecated
The following can be cleaned up after 84 eras which is tracked
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/433).

- ErasStakers.
- ErasStakersClipped.
- StakingLedger.claimed_rewards, renamed to
StakingLedger.legacy_claimed_rewards.

### Config Changes
- Renamed MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator to MaxExposurePageSize.

### TODO
- [x] Tracker ticket for cleaning up the old code after 84 eras.
- [x] Add companion.
- [x] Redo benchmarks before merge.
- [x] Add Changelog for pallet_staking.
- [x] Pallet should be configurable to enable/disable paged rewards.
- [x] Commission payouts are distributed across pages.
- [x] Review documentation thoroughly.
- [x] Rename `MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator` ->
`MaxExposurePageSize`.
- [x] NMap for `ErasStakersPaged`.
- [x] Deprecate ErasStakers.
- [x] Integrity tests.

### Followup issues
[Runtime api for deprecated ErasStakers storage
item](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/426)

---------

Co-authored-by: Javier Viola <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ross Bulat <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

# Description

The `trigger_defensive` call has been added to the `root-testing`
pallet. The idea is to have this pallet running on `Rococo/Westend` and
use it to verify if the runtime monitoring works end-to-end.

To accomplish this, `trigger_defensive` dispatches an event when it is
called.

Closes #1953

# Checklist

- [x] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the
"Description" section above
- [ ] My PR follows the [labeling requirements](CONTRIBUTING.md#Process)
of this project (at minimum one label for `T`
  required)
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if
applicable)
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works (if applicable)

You can remove the "Checklist" section once all have been checked. Thank
you for your contribution!

✄
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>

Fixes #179 

# Description

This PR makes the structure containing identity information used in
`pallet-identity` generic through the pallet `Config`. Additionally, the
old structure is now available in a separate module called `simple`
(pending rename) and is compatible with the new interface.

Another change in this PR is that while the `additional` field in
`IdentityInfo` stays for backwards compatibility reasons, the associated
costs are stil present in the pallet through the `additional` function
in the `IdentityInformationProvider` interface. This function is marked
as deprecated as it is only a temporary solution to the backwards
compatibility problem we had. In short, we could have removed the
additional fields in the struct and done a migration, but we chose to
wait and do it off-chain through the genesis of the system parachain.
After we move the identity pallet to the parachain, additional fields
will be migrated into the existing fields and the `additional` key-value
store will be removed. Until that happens, this interface will provide
the necessary information to properly account for the associated costs.

Additionally, this PR fixes an unrelated issue; the `IdentityField` enum
used to represent the fields as bitflags couldn't store more than 8
fields, even though it was marked as `#[repr(u64)]`. This was because of
the `derive` implementation of `TypeInfo`, which assumed `u8` semantics.
The custom implementation of this trait in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/commit/0105cc03


fixes the issue.

---------

Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sam Johnson <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]>

closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1882

## Breaking Changes

This PR introduces a new item to `pallet_balances::Config`:

```diff
trait Config {
++    type RuntimeFreezeReasons;
}
```

This value is only used to check it against `type MaxFreeze`. A similar
check has been added for `MaxHolds` against `RuntimeHoldReasons`, which
is already given to `pallet_balances`.

In all contexts, you should pass the real `RuntimeFreezeReasons`
generated by `construct_runtime` to `type RuntimeFreezeReasons`. Passing
`()` would also work, but it would imply that the runtime uses no
freezes at all.

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>

Reverts https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1476

The `lock_pallet` / `unlock_pallet` additions in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1814 will result in less
downtime for users than using runtime upgrades.

Combination of paritytech/polkadot#7005, its addon PR
paritytech/polkadot#7585 and its companion paritytech/cumulus#2433.

This PR introduces a new XcmFeesToAccount struct which implements the
`FeeManager` trait, and assigns this struct as the `FeeManager` in the
XCM config for all runtimes.

The struct simply deposits all fees handled by the XCM executor to a
specified account. In all runtimes, the specified account is configured
as the treasury account.

XCM __delivery__ fees are now being introduced (unless the root origin
is sending a message to a system parachain on behalf of the originating
chain).

# Note for reviewers

Most file changes are tests that had to be modified to account for the
new fees.
Main changes are in:
- cumulus/pallets/xcmp-queue/src/lib.rs <- To make it track the delivery
fees exponential factor
- polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/fee_handling.rs <- Added. Has the
FeeManager implementation
- All runtime xcm_config files <- To add the FeeManager to the XCM
configuration

# Important note

After this change, instructions that create and send a new XCM (Query*,
Report*, ExportMessage, InitiateReserveWithdraw, InitiateTeleport,
DepositReserveAsset, TransferReserveAsset, LockAsset and RequestUnlock)
will require the corresponding origin account in the origin register to
pay for transport delivery fees, and the onward message will fail to be
sent if the origin account does not have the required amount. This
delivery fee is on top of what we already collect as tx fees in
pallet-xcm and XCM BuyExecution fees!

Wallet UIs that want to expose the new delivery fee can do so using the
formula:

```
delivery_fee_factor * (base_fee + encoded_msg_len * per_byte_fee)
```

where the delivery fee factor can be obtained from the corresponding
pallet based on which transport you are using (UMP, HRMP or bridges),
the base fee is a constant, the encoded message length from the message
itself and the per byte fee is the same as the configured per byte fee
for txs (i.e. `TransactionByteFee`).

---------

Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Giles Cope <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <[email protected]>

Exposes disabled validators list via a runtime API.

---------

Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]>

### Summary 

This PR introduces new dispatchables to the treasury pallet, allowing
spends of various asset types. The enhanced features of the treasury
pallet, in conjunction with the asset-rate pallet, are set up and
enabled for Westend and Rococo.

### Westend and Rococo runtimes.

Polkadot/Kusams/Rococo Treasury can accept proposals for `spends` of
various asset kinds by specifying the asset's location and ID.

#### Treasury Instance New Dispatchables:
- `spend(AssetKind, AssetBalance, Beneficiary, Option<ValidFrom>)` -
propose and approve a spend;
- `payout(SpendIndex)` - payout an approved spend or retry a failed
payout
- `check_payment(SpendIndex)` - check the status of a payout;
- `void_spend(SpendIndex)` - void previously approved spend;
> existing spend dispatchable renamed to spend_local

in this context, the `AssetKind` parameter contains the asset's location
and it's corresponding `asset_id`, for example:
`USDT` on `AssetHub`,
``` rust
location = MultiLocation(0, X1(Parachain(1000)))
asset_id = MultiLocation(0, X2(PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)))
```

the `Beneficiary` parameter is a `MultiLocation` in the context of the
asset's location, for example
``` rust
// the Fellowship salary pallet's location / account
FellowshipSalaryPallet = MultiLocation(1, X2(Parachain(1001), PalletInstance(64)))
// or custom `AccountId`
Alice = MultiLocation(0, AccountId32(network: None, id: [1,...]))
```

the `AssetBalance` represents the amount of the `AssetKind` to be
transferred to the `Beneficiary`. For permission checks, the asset
amount is converted to the native amount and compared against the
maximum spendable amount determined by the commanding spend origin.

the `spend` dispatchable allows for batching spends with different
`ValidFrom` arguments, enabling milestone-based spending. If the
expectations tied to an approved spend are not met, it is possible to
void the spend later using the `void_spend` dispatchable.

Asset Rate Pallet provides the conversion rate from the `AssetKind` to
the native balance.

#### Asset Rate Instance Dispatchables:
- `create(AssetKind, Rate)` - initialize a conversion rate to the native
balance for the given asset
- `update(AssetKind, Rate)` - update the conversion rate to the native
balance for the given asset
- `remove(AssetKind)` - remove an existing conversion rate to the native
balance for the given asset

the pallet's dispatchables can be executed by the Root or Treasurer
origins.

### Treasury Pallet

Treasury Pallet can accept proposals for `spends` of various asset kinds
and pay them out through the implementation of the `Pay` trait.

New Dispatchables:
- `spend(Config::AssetKind, AssetBalance, Config::Beneficiary,
Option<ValidFrom>)` - propose and approve a spend;
- `payout(SpendIndex)` - payout an approved spend or retry a failed
payout;
- `check_payment(SpendIndex)` - check the status of a payout;
- `void_spend(SpendIndex)` - void previously approved spend;
> existing spend dispatchable renamed to spend_local

The parameters' types of the `spend` dispatchable exposed via the
pallet's `Config` and allows to propose and accept a spend of a certain
amount.

An approved spend can be claimed via the `payout` within the
`Config::SpendPeriod`. Clients provide an implementation of the `Pay`
trait which can pay an asset of the `AssetKind` to the `Beneficiary` in
`AssetBalance` units.

The implementation of the Pay trait might not have an immediate final
payment status, for example if implemented over `XCM` and the actual
transfer happens on a remote chain.

The `check_status` dispatchable can be executed to update the spend's
payment state and retry the `payout` if the payment has failed.

---------

Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

What does this PR do?
- Introduced the TotalValueLocked storage for nomination-pools. 
- introduced a slashing api in mock.rs 
- additional test for tracking a slashing event towards a pool without
sub-pools
- migration for the nomination-pools (V6 to V7) with
`VersionedMigration`

Why are these changes needed?
this is the continuation of the work by @Kianenigma

 in this
[PR](https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/13319)

How were these changes implemented and what do they affect?
- It's an extra StorageValue that's modified whenever funds flow in or
out of staking for any of the `bonded_account` of `BondedPools`
- The `PoolSlashed`event is now emitted even when no `SubPools` are
found

Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/155
KSM: HHEEgVzcqL3kCXgsxSfJMbsTy8dxoTctuXtpY94n4s8F4pS

---------

Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ankan <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ankan <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/158.
partially addresses
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/226.

Instead of fragile calculation of current balance by looking at `free
balance - ED`, Nomination Pool now freezes ED in the pool reward account
to restrict an account from going below minimum balance. This also has a
nice side effect that if ED changes, we know how much is the imbalance
in ED frozen in the pool and the current required ED. A pool operator
can diligently top up the pool with the deficit in ED or vice versa,
withdraw the excess they transferred to the pool.

## Notable changes
- New call `adjust_pool_deposit`: Allows to top up the deficit or
withdraw the excess deposited funds to the pool.
- Uses Fungible trait (instead of Currency trait). Since NP was not
doing any locking/reserving previously, no migration is needed for this.
- One time migration of freezing ED from each of the existing pools (not
very PoV friendly but fine for relay chain).

Migrating [PR from the archived polkadot
repo](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7272)

As per
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7272#issuecomment-1559240466,
the changes in this MR include the following pallets into [x] Rococo and
[x] Westend runtimes:

    pallet_conviction_voting
    pallet_referenda
    pallet_ranked_collective
    pallet_custom_origins
    pallet_whitelist

And only for westend-runtime:

    pallet_treasury

Following [Kusama runtime
config](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/tree/dbae30efe080a1d41fe54ef4da8af47614c9ca93/runtime/kusama/src)
as a baseline.

Benchmarking of the following pallets done for both Rococo and Westend:

    pallet_conviction_voting
    pallet_referenda
    pallet_ranked_collective (only on Rococo)
    pallet_whitelist

And only for Westend:

    pallet_treasury

Removed Gov1 from Rococo as in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6701

Rococo Gov1 storage will be cleaned in a different PR - [issue ](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1618)

---------

Co-authored-by: Giles Cope <[email protected]>

- Async-backing related primitives are stable `primitives::v6`
- Async-backing API is now part of `api_version(7)`
- It's enabled on Rococo and Westend runtimes

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>

This PR implements [`GenesisBuilder`
API](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/a414ea75

/substrate/primitives/genesis-builder/src/lib.rs#L38)
for all the runtimes in polkadot repo.

Step towards: paritytech/polkadot-sdk#25

---------

Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]>

This PR filters calls from the Identity pallet from all Relay Chain
runtimes as preparation to move the identity state and logic to a system
parachain within each network.

After this change is deployed to a runtime, no more changes such as
adding new sub-identities will be possible. The frozen state will be
part of the genesis state of the system chain. After the system chain
launches, the pallet and all state will be removed from each Relay
Chain.

Applications and UIs that render display information from this pallet
will need to read from the system chain when it launches.

**Note**: This is a lift-and-shift PR from the old substrate and
polkadot repos, both PRs have been reviewed and audited
(https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/13983,
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7140)

---

This PR implements a generic `BaseDeposit` calculation for signed
submissions, based on the size of the submission queue.

It adds a new associated type to EPM's config, `type SignedDepositBase`,
that implements `Convert<usize, BalanceOf<T>>`, which is used to
calculate the base deposit for signed submissions based on the size of
the signed submissions queue.

`struct GeometricDepositBase<Balance, Fixed, Inc>` implements the
convert trait so that the deposit value increases as a geometric
progression. The deposit base is calculated by `deposit_base =
fixed_deposit_base * (1 + increase_factor)^n`, where `n` is the term of
the progression (i.e. the number of signed submissions in the queue).
`Fixed` and `Inc` generic params are getters for `Balance` and
`IncreaseFactor` to compute the geometric progression. If
`IncreaseFactor = 0`, then the signed deposit is constant and equal to
`Fixed` regardless of the size of the queue.

### Runtime configs

In Kusama, the progression with 10% increase without changing the
current signed fixed deposit is: (term == size of the queue)

Term 1: `1,333,333,332,000`
Term 2: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10 = 1,466,666,665,200`
Term 3: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^2 = 1,613,333,331,200`
Term 4: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^3 = 1,774,666,664,320`
Term 5: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^4 = 1,952,133,330,752`
Term 6: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^5 = 2,147,346,663,827.20`
Term 7: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^6 = 2,362,081,330,210.92`
Term 8: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^7 = 2,598,289,463,231.01`
Term 9: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^8 = 2,858,118,409,554.11`
Term 10: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^9 = 3,143,930,250,509.52`

Westend:

Term 1: `2,000,000,000,000`
Term 2: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10 = 2,200,000,000,000`
Term 3: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^2 = 2,420,000,000,000`
Term 4: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^3 = 2,662,000,000,000`
Term 5: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^4 = 2,928,200,000,000`
Term 6: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^5 = 3,221,020,000,000`
Term 7: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^6 = 3,543,122,000,000`
Term 8: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^7 = 3,897,434,200,000`
Term 9: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^8 = 4,287,177,620,000`
Term 10: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^9 = 4,715,895,382,000`

and in Polkadot, the deposit increase is disabled in the current state
of the PR, as the increase factor is 0% -- so nothing changes from the
current behaviour.

Closes https://github.com/paritytech-secops/srlabs_findings/issues/189