Skip to content
  1. Jan 10, 2024
  3. Jan 09, 2024
  5. Jan 07, 2024
  7. Jan 04, 2024
  9. Dec 22, 2023
  11. Dec 21, 2023
  13. Dec 20, 2023
    • joe petrowski's avatar
      Add Authorize Upgrade Pattern to Frame System (#2682) · 280aa0b5
      joe petrowski authored 
      Adds the `authorize_upgrade` -> `enact_authorized_upgrade` pattern to
`frame-system`. This will be useful for upgrading bridged chains that
are under the governance of Polkadot without passing entire runtime Wasm
blobs over a bridge.

Notes:

- Changed `enact_authorized_upgrade` to `apply_authorized_upgrade`.
Personal opinion, "apply" more accurately expresses what it's doing. Can
change back if outvoted.
- Remove `check_version` in favor of two extrinsics, so as to make
_checked_ the default.
- Left calls in `parachain-system` and marked as deprecated to prevent
breaking the API. They just call into the `frame-system` functions.
- Updated `frame-system` benchmarks to v2 syntax.

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      280aa0b5
  15. Dec 18, 2023
  17. Dec 15, 2023
  19. Dec 14, 2023
    • Svyatoslav Nikolsky's avatar
      Add Rococo People <> Rococo Bulletin bridge support to Rococo Bridge Hub (#2540) · 097308e3
      Svyatoslav Nikolsky authored 
      This PR adds [Rococo
People](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2281) <> [Rococo
Bulletin](https://github.com/zdave-parity/polkadot-bulletin-chain) to
the Rococo Bridge Hub code. There's a couple of things left to do here:
- [x] add remaining tests - it'd need some refactoring in the
`bridge-hub-test-utils` - will do in a separate PR;
- [x] actually run benchmarks for new messaging pallet (do we have bot
nowadays?).

The reason why I'm opening it before this ^^^ is ready, is that I'd like
to hear others opinion on how to deal with hacks with that bridge.
Initially I was assuming that Rococo Bulletin will be the 1:1 copy of
the Polkadot Bulletin (to avoid maintaining multiple
runtimes/releases/...), so you can see many `PolkadotBulletin` mentions
in this PR, even though we are going to bridge with the parallel chain
(`RococoBulletin`). That's because e.g. pallet names from
`construct_runtime` are affecting runtime storage keys and bridges are
using runtime storage proofs => it is important to use names that the
Bulletin chain expects.

But in the end, this hack won't work - we can't use Polkadot Bulletin
runtime to bridge with Rococo Bridge Hub, because Polkadot Bulletin
expects Polkadot Bridge hub to use `1002` parachain id and Rococo Bridge
Hub seats on the `1013`. This also affects storage keys using in
bridging, so I had to add the [`rococo`
feature](https://github.com/svyatonik/polkadot-bulletin-chain/blob/add-bridge-pallets/runtime/Cargo.toml#L198)
to the Bulletin chain. So now we can actually alter its runtime and
adapt it for Rococo.

So the question here is - what's better for us here
- to leave everything as is (seems hacky and non-trivial);
- change Bulletin chain runtime when `rococo` feature is used - e.g. use
proper names there (`WithPolkadotGrandpa` -> `WithRococoGrandpa`, ...)
- add another set of pallets to the Bulletin chain runtime to bridge
with Rococo and never use them in production. Similar to hack that we
had in Rococo/Wococo

cc @acatangiu @bkontur @serban300 

also cc @joepetrowski

 as the main "client" of this bridge

---

A couple words on how this bridge is different from the Rococo <>
Westend bridge:
- it is a bridge with a chain that uses GRANDPA finality, not the
parachain finality (hence the tests needs to be changed);
- it is a fee-free bridge. So
`AllowExplicitUnpaidExecutionFrom<Equals<SiblingPeople>>` + we are not
paying any rewards to relayers (apart from compensating transaction
costs).

---------

Signed-off-by: default avatardependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarAdrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatardependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarEgor_P <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      097308e3
    • Francisco Aguirre's avatar
      Add FungibleAdapter (#2684) · 10a91f82
      Francisco Aguirre authored 
      In the move from the old `Currency` traits to the new `fungible/s`
family of traits, we already had the `FungiblesAdapter` and
`NonFungiblesAdapter` for multiple fungible and non fungible assets
respectively. However, for handling only one fungible asset, we were
missing a `FungibleAdapter`, and so used the old `CurrencyAdapter`
instead. This PR aims to fill in that gap, and provide the new adapter
for more updated examples.

I marked the old `CurrencyAdapter` as deprecated as part of this PR, and
I'll change it to the new `FungibleAdapter` in a following PR.
The two stages are separated so as to not bloat this PR with some name
fixes in tests.

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      10a91f82
    • Egor_P's avatar
      [Backport] txn version bump from 1.5.0 (#2709) · 3e4e8c0b
      Egor_P authored 
      This PR backports `transaction_version` bump from `1.5.0` release back
to `master`
      3e4e8c0b
  21. Dec 13, 2023
    • Squirrel's avatar
      Set clippy lints in workspace (requires rust 1.74) (#2390) · be8e6268
      Squirrel authored 
      

We currently use a bit of a hack in `.cargo/config` to make sure that
clippy isn't too annoying by specifying the list of lints.

There is now a stable way to define lints for a workspace. The only down
side is that every crate seems to have to opt into this so there's a
*few* files modified in this PR.

Dependencies:

- [x] PR that upgrades CI to use rust 1.74 is merged.

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarjoe petrowski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarLiam Aharon <[email protected]>
      be8e6268
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      Updated benchmarks related to the Rococo/Westend bridge (#2639) · 4c4407a8
      Branislav Kontur authored 
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      4c4407a8
    • Svyatoslav Nikolsky's avatar
      Tests for BridgeHub(s) <> remote GRANDPA chain (#2692) · 9ecb2d33
      Svyatoslav Nikolsky authored 
      So far the `bridge-hub-test-utils` contained a tests set for testing
BridgeHub runtime that is bridging with the remote **parachain**. But we
have https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2540 coming, which
would add Rococo <> Bulletin chain bridge (where Bulletin = standalone
chain that is using GRANDPA finality). Then it'll be expanded to
Polkadot BH as well.

So this PR adds the same set of tests to the `bridge-hub-test-utils`,
but for the case when remote chain is the chain with GRANDPA finality.
There's a lot of changes in this PR - I'll describe some:
- I've added `BasicParachainRuntime` trait to decrease number of lines
we need to add to `where` clause. Could revert, but imo it is useful;
- `cumulus/parachains/runtimes/bridge-hubs/test-utils/src/test_data` is
a submodule for generating test data for the test sets.
`from_parachain.rs` is used in tests for the case when remote chain is a
parachain, `from_grandpa_chain.rs` - for the bridges with remote GRANDPA
chains. `mod.rs` has some code, shared by both types of tests;
- `cumulus/parachains/runtimes/bridge-hubs/test-utils/src/test_data` is
a submodule with all test cases. The `mod.rs` has tests, suitable for
all cases. There's also `wth_parachain.rs` and `with_grandpa_chain.rs`
with the same meaning as above;
- I've merged the "core" code of two previous tests -
`relayed_incoming_message_works` and `complex_relay_extrinsic_works`
into one single `relayed_incoming_message_works` test. So now we are
always constructing extrinsics and are dispatching them using executive
module (meaning all signed extensions are also tested).

New test set is used here:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2540. Once this PR is
merged, I'll merge that other PR with master to remove duplicate
changes.

I'm also planning to cleanup generic constraints + remove some
unnecessary assumptions about used chains in a follow-up PRs. But for
now I think this PR has enough changes, so don't want to complicate it
even more.

---

Breaking changes for the code that have used those tests before:
- the `construct_and_apply_extrinsic` callback now accepts the
`RuntimeCall` instead of the `pallet_utility::Call`;
- the `construct_and_apply_extrinsic` now may be called multiple times
for the single test, so make sure the `frame_system::CheckNonce` is
correctly constructed;
- all previous tests have been moved from
`bridge_hub_test_utils::test_cases` to
`bridge_hub_test_utils::test_cases::from_parachain` module;
- there are several changes in test arguments - please refer to
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/compare/sv-tests-for-bridge-with-remote-grandpa-chain?expand=1#diff-79a28d4d3e1749050341c2424f00c4c139825b1a20937767f83e58b95166735c
for details.
      9ecb2d33
  23. Dec 12, 2023
    • Francisco Aguirre's avatar
      Fix ParentOrSiblings (#2428) · 313b2c4b
      Francisco Aguirre authored 
      

We were not filtering for sibling parachains, but for sibling anything

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      313b2c4b
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      Ensure xcm versions over bridge (on sending chains) (#2481) · 575b8f8d
      Branislav Kontur authored 
      ## Summary

This pull request proposes a solution for improved control of the
versioned XCM flow over the bridge (across different consensus chains)
and resolves the situation where the sending chain/consensus has already
migrated to a higher XCM version than the receiving chain/consensus.

## Problem/Motivation

The current flow over the bridge involves a transfer from AssetHubRococo
(AHR) to BridgeHubRococo (BHR) to BridgeHubWestend (BHW) and finally to
AssetHubWestend (AHW), beginning with a reserve-backed transfer on AHR.

In this process:
1. AHR sends XCM `ExportMessage` through `XcmpQueue`, incorporating XCM
version checks using the `WrapVersion` feature, influenced by
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion` (managed by
`pallet_xcm::force_xcm_version` or version discovery).

2. BHR handles the `ExportMessage` instruction, utilizing the latest XCM
version. The `HaulBlobExporter` converts the inner XCM to
[`VersionedXcm::from`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/63ac2471aa0210f0ac9903bdd7d8f9351f9a635f/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/universal_exports.rs#L465-L467),
also using the latest XCM version.

However, challenges arise:
- Incompatibility when BHW uses a different version than BHR. For
instance, if BHR migrates to **XCMv4** while BHW remains on **XCMv3**,
BHR's `VersionedXcm::from` uses `VersionedXcm::V4` variant, causing
encoding issues for BHW.
  ```
	/// Just a simulation of possible error, which could happen on BHW
	/// (this code is based on actual master without XCMv4)
	let encoded = hex_literal::hex!("0400");
	println!("{:?}", VersionedXcm::<()>::decode(&mut &encoded[..]));

Err(Error { cause: None, desc: "Could not decode `VersionedXcm`, variant
doesn't exist" })
  ``` 
- Similar compatibility issues exist between AHR and AHW.

## Solution

This pull request introduces the following solutions:

1. **New trait `CheckVersion`** - added to the `xcm` module and exposing
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion`. This enhancement allows checking the
actual XCM version for desired destinations outside of the `pallet_xcm`
module.

2. **Version Check in `HaulBlobExporter`** uses `CheckVersion` to check
known/configured destination versions, ensuring compatibility. For
example, in the scenario mentioned, BHR can store the version `3` for
BHW. If BHR is on XCMv4, it will attempt to downgrade the message to
version `3` instead of using the latest version `4`.

3. **Version Check in `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router`** - this check
ensures compatibility with the real destination's XCM version,
preventing the unnecessary sending of messages to the local bridge hub
if versions are incompatible.

These additions aim to improve the control and compatibility of XCM
flows over the bridge and addressing issues related to version
mismatches.

## Possible alternative solution

_(More investigation is needed, and at the very least, it should extend
to XCMv4/5. If this proves to be a viable option, I can open an RFC for
XCM.)._

Add the `XcmVersion` attribute to the `ExportMessage` so that the
sending chain can determine, based on what is stored in
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion`, the version the destination is using.
This way, we may not need to handle the version in `HaulBlobExporter`.

```
ExportMessage {
	network: NetworkId,
	destination: InteriorMultiLocation,
	xcm: Xcm<()>
	destination_xcm_version: Version, // <- new attritbute
},
```

```
pub trait ExportXcm {
        fn validate(
		network: NetworkId,
		channel: u32,
		universal_source: &mut Option<InteriorMultiLocation>,
		destination: &mut Option<InteriorMultiLocation>,
		message: &mut Option<Xcm<()>>,
                destination_xcm_version: Version, , // <- new attritbute
	) -> SendResult<Self::Ticket>;
```

## Future Directions

This PR does not fix version discovery over bridge, further
investigation will be conducted here:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2417.

## TODO

- [x] `pallet_xcm` mock for tests uses hard-coded XCM version `2` -
change to 3 or lastest?
- [x] fix `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router`
- [x] fix HaulBlobExporter with version determination
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/2183669d05f9b510f979a0cc3c7847707bacba2e/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/universal_exports.rs#L465)
- [x] add unit-tests to the runtimes
- [x] run benchmarks for `ExportMessage`
- [x] extend local run scripts about `force_xcm_version(dest, version)`
- [ ] when merged, prepare governance calls for Rococo/Westend
- [ ] add PRDoc

Part of: https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2719

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      575b8f8d
    • Chevdor's avatar
      Changelogs local generation (#1411) · 42a3afba
      Chevdor authored 
      

This PR introduces a script and some templates to use the prdoc involved
in a release and build:
- the changelog
- a simple draft of audience documentation

Since the prdoc presence was enforced in the middle of the version
1.5.0, not all PRs did come with a `prdoc` file.
This PR creates all the missing `prdoc` files with some minimum content
allowing to properly generate the changelog.
The generated content is **not** suitable for the audience
documentation.

The audience documentation will be possible with the next version, when
all PR come with a proper `prdoc`.

## Assumptions

- the prdoc files for release `vX.Y.Z` have been moved under
`prdoc/X.Y.Z`
- the changelog requires for now for the prdoc files to contain author +
topic. Thos fields are optional.

The build script can  be called as:
```
VERSION=X.Y.Z ./scripts/release/build-changelogs.sh
```

Related:
-  #1408

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarEgorPopelyaev <[email protected]>
      42a3afba
  25. Dec 06, 2023
    • Svyatoslav Nikolsky's avatar
      Added AllSiblingSystemParachains matcher to be used at a parachain level (#2422) · 0b3d0677
      Svyatoslav Nikolsky authored 
      As suggested in this thread:
https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/87#discussion_r1400237122



We already have the `IsChildSystemParachain`, which may be used at relay
chain, but it can't be used at a parachain level. So let's use
`AllSiblingSystemParachains` for that. I was thinking about
`AllSystemParachains`, but it may cause wrong impression that it can be
used at a relay chain level.

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarjoe petrowski <[email protected]>
      0b3d0677
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      Bridges subtree update (#2602) · be500fc2
      Branislav Kontur authored 
      ## Summary

This PR aligns Rococo/Westend bridge with latest Bridges repo
development:
- https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/pull/2727
- https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/pull/2728
- https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/pull/2729




Part of: https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2452
      be500fc2
    • Adrian Catangiu's avatar
      pallet-xcm: add new flexible `transfer_assets()` call/extrinsic (#2388) · e7651cf4
      Adrian Catangiu authored 
      # Motivation (+testing)

### Enable easy `ForeignAssets` transfers using `pallet-xcm` 

We had just previously added capabilities to teleport fees during
reserve-based transfers, but what about reserve-transferring fees when
needing to teleport some non-fee asset?

This PR aligns everything under either explicit reserve-transfer,
explicit teleport, or this new flexible `transfer_assets()` which can
mix and match as needed with fewer artificial constraints imposed to the
user.

This will enable, for example, a (non-system) parachain to teleport
their `ForeignAssets` assets to AssetHub while using DOT to pay fees.
(the assets are teleported - as foreign assets should from their owner
chain - while DOT used for fees can only be reserve-based transferred
between said parachain and AssetHub).

Added `xcm-emulator` tests for this scenario ^.

# Description

Reverts `(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets` to only allow reserve-based
transfers for all `assets` including fees.

Similarly `(limited_)teleport_assets` only allows teleports for all
`assets` including fees.
    
For complex combinations of asset transfers where assets and fees may
have different reserves or different reserve/teleport trust
configurations, users can use the newly added `transfer_assets()`
extrinsic which is more flexible in allowing more complex scenarios.

`assets` (excluding `fees`) must have same reserve location or otherwise
be teleportable to `dest`.
No limitations imposed on `fees`.

- for local reserve: transfer assets to sovereign account of destination
chain and forward a notification XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit
reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`.
- for destination reserve: burn local assets and forward a notification
to `dest` chain to withdraw the reserve assets from this chain's
sovereign account and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
- for remote reserve: burn local assets, forward XCM to reserve chain to
move reserves from this chain's SA to `dest` chain's SA, and forward
another XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to
`beneficiary`.
- for teleports: burn local assets and forward XCM to `dest` chain to
mint/teleport assets and deposit them to `beneficiary`.

## Review notes

Only around 500 lines are prod code (see `pallet_xcm/src/lib.rs`), the
rest of the PR is new tests and improving existing tests.

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      e7651cf4
  27. Dec 05, 2023
  29. Dec 04, 2023
  31. Dec 01, 2023
  33. Nov 30, 2023
  35. Nov 29, 2023
  37. Nov 27, 2023
  39. Nov 24, 2023
  41. Nov 17, 2023
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      Relax `force_default_xcm_version` for testnet system parachains (#2385) · 0385902c
      Branislav Kontur authored 
      This PR fixes two things:
- relax `force_default_xcm_version` for testnet system parachains (e.g.
BridgeHubWestend has now 2 and there is no way to change it to 3, so we
need to call `force_xcm_version(3)` for every parachain that it is
connected to, because we send XCMv3 messages)
- add `Storage` item to `PolkadotXcm` pallet definition (now we cannot
see storage items for `pallet_xcm` in PJS)


## TODO

- [ ] when merged open PR to `polkadot-fellows/runtimes` repo
      0385902c
  43. Nov 16, 2023
  45. Nov 15, 2023
  47. Nov 14, 2023
    • georgepisaltu's avatar
      Add simple collator election mechanism (#1340) · 7d735fc8
      georgepisaltu authored 
      Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/106

Port of cumulus PR https://github.com/paritytech/cumulus/pull/2960

This PR adds the ability to bid for collator slots even after the max
number of collators have already registered. This eliminates the first
come, first served mechanism that was in place before.

Key changes:
- added `update_bond` extrinsic to allow registered candidates to adjust
their bonds in order to dynamically control their bids
- added `take_candidate_slot` extrinsic to try to replace an already
existing candidate by bidding more than them
- candidates are now kept in a sorted list in the pallet storage, where
the top `DesiredCandidates` out of `MaxCandidates` candidates in the
list will be selected by the session pallet as collators
- if the candidacy bond is increased through a `set_candidacy_bond`
call, candidates which don't meet the new bond requirements are kicked


# Checklist

- [ ] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the
"Description" section above
- [ ] My PR follows the [labeling
requirements](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md#process

)
of this project (at minimum one label for `T` required)
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if
applicable)
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works (if applicable)
- [ ] If this PR alters any external APIs or interfaces used by
Polkadot, the corresponding Polkadot PR is ready as well as the
corresponding Cumulus PR (optional)

---------

Signed-off-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
      7d735fc8
  49. Nov 13, 2023
    • Adrian Catangiu's avatar
      pallet-xcm: enhance `reserve_transfer_assets` to support remote reserves (#1672) · 18257373
      Adrian Catangiu authored 
      ## Motivation

`pallet-xcm` is the main user-facing interface for XCM functionality,
including assets manipulation functions like `teleportAssets()` and
`reserve_transfer_assets()` calls.

While `teleportAsset()` works both ways, `reserve_transfer_assets()`
works only for sending reserve-based assets to a remote destination and
beneficiary when the reserve is the _local chain_.

## Solution

This PR enhances `pallet_xcm::(limited_)reserve_withdraw_assets` to
support transfers when reserves are other chains.
This will allow complete, **bi-directional** reserve-based asset
transfers user stories using `pallet-xcm`.

Enables following scenarios:
- transferring assets with local reserve (was previously supported iff
asset used as fee also had local reserve - now it works in all cases),
- transferring assets with reserve on destination,
- transferring assets with reserve on remote/third-party chain (iff
assets and fees have same remote reserve),
- transferring assets with reserve different than the reserve of the
asset to be used as fees - meaning can be used to transfer random asset
with local/dest reserve while using DOT for fees on all involved chains,
even if DOT local/dest reserve doesn't match asset reserve,
- transferring assets with any type of local/dest reserve while using
fees which can be teleported between involved chains.

All of the above is done by pallet inner logic without the user having
to specify which scenario/reserves/teleports/etc. The correct scenario
and corresponding XCM programs are identified, and respectively, built
automatically based on runtime configuration of trusted teleporters and
trusted reserves.

#### Current limitations:
- while `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CAN have different reserves (or
fees CAN be teleported), the remaining "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT, among
themselves, have different reserve locations (this is also implicitly
enforced by `MAX_ASSETS_FOR_TRANSFER=2`, but this can be safely
increased in the future).
- `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT have **different remote**
reserves (this could also be supported in the future, but adds even more
complexity while possibly not being worth it - we'll see what the future
holds).

Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1584
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2055



---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
      18257373