- Feb 19, 2024
-
-
Anton Vilhelm Ásgeirsson authored
Adds the coretime and on demand pallets to enable Coretime on Westend. In order for the migration to run successfully, we need the Broker/Coretime parachain to be live. TODO: - [ ] Broker parachain is live https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3272 --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
s0me0ne-unkn0wn authored
This is a follow-up for `im-online` pallet removal that is cleaning up its off-chain storage. Must be merged no earlier than #2265 is enacted. Related: #1964 --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
- Feb 18, 2024
-
-
s0me0ne-unkn0wn authored
A follow-up of #2265. Removes weights no longer needed.
-
- Feb 16, 2024
-
-
georgepisaltu authored
Fixes #3014 This PR adds retry mechanics to `pallet-scheduler`, as described in the issue above. Users can now set a retry configuration for a task so that, in case its scheduled run fails, it will be retried after a number of blocks, for a specified number of times or until it succeeds. If a retried task runs successfully before running out of retries, its remaining retry counter will be reset to the initial value. If a retried task runs out of retries, it will be removed from the schedule. Tasks which need to be scheduled for a retry are still subject to weight metering and agenda space, same as a regular task. Periodic tasks will have their periodic schedule put on hold while the task is retrying. --------- Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Feb 15, 2024
-
-
Gonçalo Pestana authored
This PR implements an (optional) cap of the era inflation that is allocated to staking rewards. The remaining is minted directly into the [`RewardRemainder`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/fb0fd3e6/substrate/frame/staking/src/pallet/mod.rs#L160) account, which is the treasury pot account in Polkadot and Kusama. The staking pallet now has a percent storage item, `MaxStakersRewards`, which defines the max percentage of the era inflation that should be allocated to staking rewards. The remaining era inflation (i.e. `remaining = max_era_payout - staking_payout.min(staking_payout * MaxStakersRewards))` is minted directly into the treasury. The `MaxStakersRewards` can be set by a privileged origin through the `set_staking_configs` extrinsic. **To finish** - [x] run benchmarks for westend-runtime Replaces https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1483 Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/403 --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Feb 13, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
I found out during the cleanup of this deprecation message in the `polkadot-fellows` repository that we deprecated `CurrencyAdapter` without making the recommended changes. ## TODO - [ ] fix `polkadot-fellows` bump to 1.6.0 https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/159 --------- Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
-
- Feb 09, 2024
-
-
Egor_P authored
This PR backports version bumps from `1.7.0` release branch and moves related prdoc files to the appropriate folder.
-
- Feb 08, 2024
-
-
Gonçalo Pestana authored
The `TotalLockedValue` storage value in nomination pools pallet may get out of sync if the staking pallet does implicit withdrawal of unlocking chunks belonging to a bonded pool stash. This fix is based on a new method in the `OnStakingUpdate` traits, `on_withdraw`, which allows the nomination pools pallet to adjust the `TotalLockedValue` every time there is an implicit or explicit withdrawal from a bonded pool's stash. This PR also adds a migration that checks and updates the on-chain TVL if it got out of sync due to the bug this PR fixes. **Changes to `trait OnStakingUpdate`** In order for staking to notify the nomination pools pallet that chunks where withdrew, we add a new method, `on_withdraw` to the `OnStakingUpdate` trait. The nomination pools pallet filters the withdraws that are related to bonded pool accounts and updates the `TotalValueLocked` accordingly. **Others** - Adds try-state checks to the EPM/staking e2e tests - Adds tests for auto withdrawing in the context of nomination pools **To-do** - [x] check if we need a migration to fix the current `TotalValueLocked` (run try-runtime) - [x] migrations to fix the current on-chain TVL value
✅ **Kusama**: ``` TotalValueLocked: 99.4559 kKSM TotalValueLocked (calculated) 99.4559 kKSM ```⚠ ️ **Westend**: ``` TotalValueLocked: 18.4060 kWND TotalValueLocked (calculated) 18.4050 kWND ``` **Polkadot**: TVL not released yet. Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3055 --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Ross Bulat <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]>
-
- Feb 06, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
Relates to: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3214 ## TODO - [ ] backport to the `1.7.0` release
-
- Jan 31, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
[frame] `#[pallet::composite_enum]` improved variant count handling + removed `pallet_balances`'s `MaxHolds` config (#2657) I started this investigation/issue based on @liamaharon question [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1801#discussion_r1410452499). ## Problem The `pallet_balances` integrity test should correctly detect that the runtime has correct distinct `HoldReasons` variant count. I assume the same situation exists for RuntimeFreezeReason. It is not a critical problem, if we set `MaxHolds` with a sufficiently large value, everything should be ok. However, in this case, the integrity_test check becomes less useful. **Situation for "any" runtime:** - `HoldReason` enums from different pallets: ```rust /// from pallet_nis #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason { NftReceipt, } /// from pallet_preimage #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason { Preimage, } // from pallet_state-trie-migration #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason { SlashForContinueMigrate, SlashForMigrateCustomTop, SlashForMigrateCustomChild, } ``` - generated `RuntimeHoldReason` enum looks like: ```rust pub enum RuntimeHoldReason { #[codec(index = 32u8)] Preimage(pallet_preimage::HoldReason), #[codec(index = 38u8)] Nis(pallet_nis::HoldReason), #[codec(index = 42u8)] StateTrieMigration(pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason), } ``` - composite enum `RuntimeHoldReason` variant count is detected as `3` - we set `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>` - `pallet_balances::integrity_test` is ok with `3`(at least 3) However, the real problem can occur in a live runtime where some functionality might stop working. This is due to a total of 5 distinct hold reasons (for pallets with multi-instance support, it is even more), and not all of them can be used because of an incorrect `MaxHolds`, which is deemed acceptable according to the `integrity_test`: ``` // pseudo-code - if we try to call all of these: T::Currency::hold(&pallet_nis::HoldReason::NftReceipt.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; T::Currency::hold(&pallet_preimage::HoldReason::Preimage.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForContinueMigrate.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; // With `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>` these two will fail T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomTop.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomChild.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; ``` ## Solutions A macro `#[pallet::*]` expansion is extended of `VariantCount` implementation for the `#[pallet::composite_enum]` enum type. This expansion generates the `VariantCount` implementation for pallets' `HoldReason`, `FreezeReason`, `LockId`, and `SlashReason`. Enum variants must be plain enum values without fields to ensure a deterministic count. The composite runtime enum, `RuntimeHoldReason` and `RuntimeFreezeReason`, now sets `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT` as the sum of pallets' enum `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT`: ```rust #[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)] mod module_single_instance { #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason { ModuleSingleInstanceReason1, ModuleSingleInstanceReason2, } ... } #[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)] mod module_multi_instance { #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason<I: 'static = ()> { ModuleMultiInstanceReason1, ModuleMultiInstanceReason2, ModuleMultiInstanceReason3, } ... } impl self::sp_api_hidden_includes_construct_runtime::hidden_include::traits::VariantCount for RuntimeHoldReason { const VARIANT_COUNT: u32 = 0 + module_single_instance::HoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance1>::VARIANT_COUNT + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance2>::VARIANT_COUNT + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance3>::VARIANT_COUNT; } ``` In addition, `MaxHolds` is removed (as suggested [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2657#discussion_r1443324573)) from `pallet_balances`, and its `Holds` are now bounded to `RuntimeHoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT`. Therefore, there is no need to let the runtime specify `MaxHolds`. ## For reviewers Relevant changes can be found here: - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/lib.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/parse/composite.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/expand/composite.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/composite_helper.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/hold_reason.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/freeze_reason.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/src/traits/misc.rs` And the rest of the files is just about removed `MaxHolds` from `pallet_balances` ## Next steps Do the same for `MaxFreezes` https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2997. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: gupnik <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 30, 2024
-
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
Add `Balances::force_adjust_total_issuance` as preparation for fixing https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/issues/147. Important changes in `substrate/frame/balances/src/lib.rs`. TODO: - [x] Update weights --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
Robert Hambrock authored
Moves `pallet_mmr` back behind `pallet_session` to address polkadot-fellows/runtimes#160. Opening draft for CI - should be merged or closed depending on outcome of w3f/polkadot-spec#718. --------- Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 24, 2024
-
-
Just van Stam authored
Moved from: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6951 closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/490 - [x] update cumulus --- This PR introduces transactional processing of certain xcm instructions. For the list of instructions checkout https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/490. The transactional processing is implemented as an xcm-executor config item. The two implementations in this PR are `FrameTransactionalProcessor` and `()`. The `()` implementation does no transactional processing. Each implementation of the `ProcessTransaction` trait has an `IS_TRANSACTIONAL` const that tells the XCVM if transactional processing is actually implemented. If Transactional processing is implemented, changes to touched registers should also be rolled back to prevent inconsistencies. Note for reviewers: Check out the following safety assumption: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1222/files#diff-4effad7d8c1c9de19fd27e18661cbf2128c8718f3b2420a27d2f816e0749ea53R30 --------- Co-authored-by: Keith Yeung <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Jan 23, 2024
-
-
joe petrowski authored
-
- Jan 22, 2024
-
-
joe petrowski authored
Clean up all the old syntax. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: gupnik <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Nikhil Gupta <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Maksym H <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 18, 2024
-
-
Tsvetomir Dimitrov authored
Backport of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1863 to master Extend candidate sanitation in paras_inherent by removing backing votes from disabled validators. Check https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1592 for more details. This change is related to the disabling strategy implementation (https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2226). --------- Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Maciej <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 17, 2024
-
-
Egor_P authored
This PR backports version bumps from release branch `release-polkadot-v1.6.0` back to `master` and also moved `prdoc` files related to the release to the appropriate folder
-
- Jan 16, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
# Note for reviewer Most changes are just syntax changes necessary for the new version. Most important files should be the ones under the `xcm` folder. # Description Added XCMv4. ## Removed `Multi` prefix The following types have been renamed: - MultiLocation -> Location - MultiAsset -> Asset - MultiAssets -> Assets - InteriorMultiLocation -> InteriorLocation - MultiAssetFilter -> AssetFilter - VersionedMultiAsset -> VersionedAsset - WildMultiAsset -> WildAsset - VersionedMultiLocation -> VersionedLocation In order to fix a name conflict, the `Assets` in `xcm-executor` were renamed to `HoldingAssets`, as they represent assets in holding. ## Removed `Abstract` asset id It was not being used anywhere and this simplifies the code. Now assets are just constructed as follows: ```rust let asset: Asset = (AssetId(Location::new(1, Here)), 100u128).into(); ``` No need for specifying `Concrete` anymore. ## Outcome is now a named fields struct Instead of ```rust pub enum Outcome { Complete(Weight), Incomplete(Weight, Error), Error(Error), } ``` we now have ```rust pub enum Outcome { Complete { used: Weight }, Incomplete { used: Weight, error: Error }, Error { error: Error }, } ``` ## Added Reanchorable trait Now both locations and assets implement this trait, making it easier to reanchor both. ## New syntax for building locations and junctions Now junctions are built using the following methods: ```rust let location = Location { parents: 1, interior: [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)].into() }; ``` or ```rust let location = Location::new(1, [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)]); ``` And they are matched like so: ```rust match location.unpack() { (1, [Parachain(id)]) => ... (0, Here) => ..., (1, [_]) => ..., } ``` This syntax is mandatory in v4, and has been also implemented for v2 and v3 for easier migration. This was needed to make all sizes smaller. # TODO - [x] Scaffold v4 - [x] Port github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7236 - [x] Remove `Multi` prefix - [x] Remove `Abstract` asset id --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Keith Yeung <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 10, 2024
-
-
joe petrowski authored
This PR allows _username authorities_ to issue unique usernames that correspond with an account. It also provides two-way lookup, that is from `AccountId` to a single, "primary" `Username` (alongside `Registration`) and multiple unique `Username`s to an `AccountId`. Key features: - Username Authorities added (and removed) via privileged origin. - Authorities have a `suffix` and an `allocation`. They can grant up to `allocation` usernames. Their `suffix` will be appended to the usernames that they issue. A suffix may be up to 7 characters long. - Users can ask an authority to grant them a username. This will take the form `myusername.suffix`. The entire name (including suffix) must be less than or equal to 32 alphanumeric characters. - Users can approve a username for themselves in one of two ways (that is, authorities cannot grant them arbitrarily): - Pre-sign the entire username (including suffix) with a secret key that corresponds to their `AccountId` (for keyed accounts, obviously); or - Accept the username after it has been granted by an authority (it will be queued until accepted) (for non-keyed accounts like pure proxies or multisigs). - The system does not require any funds or deposits. Users without an identity will be given a default one (presumably all fields set to `None`). If they update this info, they will need to place the normal storage deposit. - If a user does not have any username, their first one will be set as `Primary`, and their `AccountId` will map to that one. If they get subsequent usernames, they can choose which one to be their primary via `set_primary_username`. - There are some state cleanup functions to remove expired usernames that have not been accepted and dangling usernames whose owners have called `clear_identity`. TODO: - [x] Add migration to runtimes - [x] Probably do off-chain migration into People Chain genesis - [x] Address a few TODO questions in code (please review) --------- Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 06, 2024
-
-
Serban Iorga authored
Related to https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2787 Adding BEEFY support to the kitchensink chain in order to be able to extend the current warp sync zombienet tests with BEEFY enabled
-
- Dec 22, 2023
-
-
joe petrowski authored
Rococo and Westend runtimes for the "People Chain". This chain contains the Identity pallet with plans to migrate all related data from the Relay Chain. Changes `IdentityInfo` to: - Remove `additional_fields`. - Add `github` and `discord` as first class fields. From scraping chain data, these were the only two additional fields used (for the Fellowship and Ambassador Program, respectively). - Rename `riot` to `matrix`. Note: This will use the script in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2025 to generate the genesis state. TODO: - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1814 and integration of the Identity Migrator pallet for migration. - [x] Tests: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2373 --------- Co-authored-by: Muharem <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Michal Kucharczyk <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Richard Melkonian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]>
-
- Dec 21, 2023
-
-
eskimor authored
Also fixes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1417 - [x] CoreIndex -> AssignmentProvider mapping will be able to change any time. - [x] Implement - [x] Provide Migrations - [x] Add and fix tests - [x] Implement bulk assigner logic - [x] bulk assigner tests - [x] Port over current assigner to use bulk designer (+ share on-demand with bulk): top-level assigner has core ranges: legacy, bulk - [x] Adjust migrations to reflect new assigner structure - [x] Move migration code to Assignment code directly and make it recursive (make it possible to skip releases) -> follow up ticket. - [x] Test migrations - [x] Add migration PR to runtimes repo -> follow up ticket. - [x] Wire up with actual UMP messages - [x] Write PR docs --------- Co-authored-by: eskimor <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bradley Olson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: BradleyOlson64 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Anton Vilhelm Ásgeirsson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: antonva <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Marcin S. <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Dec 20, 2023
-
-
joe petrowski authored
Adds the `authorize_upgrade` -> `enact_authorized_upgrade` pattern to `frame-system`. This will be useful for upgrading bridged chains that are under the governance of Polkadot without passing entire runtime Wasm blobs over a bridge. Notes: - Changed `enact_authorized_upgrade` to `apply_authorized_upgrade`. Personal opinion, "apply" more accurately expresses what it's doing. Can change back if outvoted. - Remove `check_version` in favor of two extrinsics, so as to make _checked_ the default. - Left calls in `parachain-system` and marked as deprecated to prevent breaking the API. They just call into the `frame-system` functions. - Updated `frame-system` benchmarks to v2 syntax. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Dec 15, 2023
-
-
Ankan authored
closes https://github.com/paritytech-secops/srlabs_findings/issues/78. Removes `BetterUnsignedThreshold` from pallet EPM. This will essentially mean any solution submitted by the validator that is strictly better than the current queued solution would be accepted. The reason for having these thresholds is to limit number of solutions submitted on-chain. However for unsigned submissions, the number of solutions that could be submitted on average is limited even without thresholding (calculation shown in the corresponding issue).
-
- Dec 14, 2023
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
In the move from the old `Currency` traits to the new `fungible/s` family of traits, we already had the `FungiblesAdapter` and `NonFungiblesAdapter` for multiple fungible and non fungible assets respectively. However, for handling only one fungible asset, we were missing a `FungibleAdapter`, and so used the old `CurrencyAdapter` instead. This PR aims to fill in that gap, and provide the new adapter for more updated examples. I marked the old `CurrencyAdapter` as deprecated as part of this PR, and I'll change it to the new `FungibleAdapter` in a following PR. The two stages are separated so as to not bloat this PR with some name fixes in tests. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
Egor_P authored
This PR backports `transaction_version` bump from `1.5.0` release back to `master`
-
- Dec 13, 2023
-
-
Alexandru Gheorghe authored
Initial implementation for the plan discussed here: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/701 Built on top of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1178 v0: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7554, ## Overall idea When approval-voting checks a candidate and is ready to advertise the approval, defer it in a per-relay chain block until we either have MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT candidates to sign or a candidate has stayed MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS in the queue, in both cases we sign what candidates we have available. This should allow us to reduce the number of approvals messages we have to create/send/verify. The parameters are configurable, so we should find some values that balance: - Security of the network: Delaying broadcasting of an approval shouldn't but the finality at risk and to make sure that never happens we won't delay sending a vote if we are past 2/3 from the no-show time. - Scalability of the network: MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT = 1 & MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS =0, is what we have now and we know from the measurements we did on versi, it bottlenecks approval-distribution/approval-voting when increase significantly the number of validators and parachains - Block storage: In case of disputes we have to import this votes on chain and that increase the necessary storage with MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT * CandidateHash per vote. Given that disputes are not the normal way of the network functioning and we will limit MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT in the single digits numbers, this should be good enough. Alternatively, we could try to create a better way to store this on-chain through indirection, if that's needed. ## Other fixes: - Fixed the fact that we were sending random assignments to non-validators, that was wrong because those won't do anything with it and they won't gossip it either because they do not have a grid topology set, so we would waste the random assignments. - Added metrics to be able to debug potential no-shows and mis-processing of approvals/assignments. ## TODO: - [x] Get feedback, that this is moving in the right direction. @ordian @sandreim @eskimor @burdges, let me know what you think. - [x] More and more testing. - [x] Test in versi. - [x] Make MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT & MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_WAIT_MILLIS a parachain host configuration. - [x] Make sure the backwards compatibility works correctly - [x] Make sure this direction is compatible with other streams of work: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/635 & https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/742 - [x] Final versi burn-in before merging --------- Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
-
- Dec 12, 2023
-
-
Chevdor authored
This PR introduces a script and some templates to use the prdoc involved in a release and build: - the changelog - a simple draft of audience documentation Since the prdoc presence was enforced in the middle of the version 1.5.0, not all PRs did come with a `prdoc` file. This PR creates all the missing `prdoc` files with some minimum content allowing to properly generate the changelog. The generated content is **not** suitable for the audience documentation. The audience documentation will be possible with the next version, when all PR come with a proper `prdoc`. ## Assumptions - the prdoc files for release `vX.Y.Z` have been moved under `prdoc/X.Y.Z` - the changelog requires for now for the prdoc files to contain author + topic. Thos fields are optional. The build script can be called as: ``` VERSION=X.Y.Z ./scripts/release/build-changelogs.sh ``` Related: - #1408 --------- Co-authored-by: EgorPopelyaev <[email protected]>
-
Ross Bulat authored
Partially Addresses #2500 Adds a `deprecate_controller_batch` call to the staking pallet that is callable by `Root` and `StakingAdmin`. To be used for controller account deprecation and removed thereafter. Adds `MaxControllersDeprecationBatch` pallet constant that defines max possible deprecations per call. - [x] Add `deprecate_controller_batch` call, and `MaxControllersInDeprecationBatch` constant. - [x] Add tests, benchmark, weights. Tests that weight is only consumed if unique pair. - [x] Adds `StakingAdmin` origin to staking's `AdminOrigin` type in westend runtime. - [x] Determined that worst case 5,900 deprecations does fit into `maxBlock` `proofSize` and `refTime` in both normal and operational thresholds, meaning we can deprecate all controllers for each network in one call. ## Block Weights By querying `consts.system.blockWeights` we can see that the `deprecate_controller_batch` weights fit within the `normal` threshold on Polkadot. #### `controller_deprecation_batch` where i = 5900: #### Ref time: 69,933,325,300 #### Proof size: 21,040,390 ### Polkadot ``` // consts.query.blockWeights maxBlock: { refTime: 2,000,000,000,000 proofSize: 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 } normal: { maxExtrinsic: { refTime: 1,479,873,955,000 proofSize: 13,650,590,614,545,068,195 } maxTotal: { refTime: 1,500,000,000,000 proofSize: 13,835,058,055,282,163,711 } } ``` ### Kusama ``` // consts.query.blockWeights maxBlock: { refTime: 2,000,000,000,000 proofSize: 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 } normal: { maxExtrinsic: { refTime: 1,479,875,294,000 proofSize: 13,650,590,614,545,068,195 } maxTotal: { refTime: 1,500,000,000,000 proofSize: 13,835,058,055,282,163,711 } } ``` --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <[email protected]>
-
- Dec 11, 2023
-
-
Gabriel Facco de Arruda authored
This PR makes the block number provider configurable through the Config trait in pallet-vesting, this gives parachains the option to use the relay chain block number provider from ParachainSystem. --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
- Dec 08, 2023
-
-
Muharem Ismailov authored
Treasury Pallet Instance for the Fellowship in Westend Collectives. In this update, we present a Treasury Pallet Instance that is under the control of the Fellowship body, with oversight from the Root and Treasurer origins. Here's how it is governed: - the Root origin have the authority to reject or approve spend proposals, with no amount limit for approvals. - the Treasurer origin have the authority to reject or approve spend proposals, with approval limits of up to 10,000,000 DOT. - Voice of all Fellows ranked at 3 or above can reject or approve spend proposals, with a maximum approval limit of 10,000 DOT. - Voice of Fellows ranked at 4 or above can also reject or approve spend proposals, with a maximum approval limit of 10,000,000 DOT. Additionally, we introduce the Asset Rate Pallet Instance to establish conversion rates from asset A to B. This is used to determine if a proposed spend amount involving a non-native asset is permissible by the commanding origin. The rates can be set up by the Root, Treasurer origins, or Voice of all Fellows. --------- Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: joepetrowski <[email protected]>
-
- Dec 07, 2023
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2641
-
- Dec 06, 2023
-
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
# Motivation (+testing) ### Enable easy `ForeignAssets` transfers using `pallet-xcm` We had just previously added capabilities to teleport fees during reserve-based transfers, but what about reserve-transferring fees when needing to teleport some non-fee asset? This PR aligns everything under either explicit reserve-transfer, explicit teleport, or this new flexible `transfer_assets()` which can mix and match as needed with fewer artificial constraints imposed to the user. This will enable, for example, a (non-system) parachain to teleport their `ForeignAssets` assets to AssetHub while using DOT to pay fees. (the assets are teleported - as foreign assets should from their owner chain - while DOT used for fees can only be reserve-based transferred between said parachain and AssetHub). Added `xcm-emulator` tests for this scenario ^. # Description Reverts `(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets` to only allow reserve-based transfers for all `assets` including fees. Similarly `(limited_)teleport_assets` only allows teleports for all `assets` including fees. For complex combinations of asset transfers where assets and fees may have different reserves or different reserve/teleport trust configurations, users can use the newly added `transfer_assets()` extrinsic which is more flexible in allowing more complex scenarios. `assets` (excluding `fees`) must have same reserve location or otherwise be teleportable to `dest`. No limitations imposed on `fees`. - for local reserve: transfer assets to sovereign account of destination chain and forward a notification XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`. - for destination reserve: burn local assets and forward a notification to `dest` chain to withdraw the reserve assets from this chain's sovereign account and deposit them to `beneficiary`. - for remote reserve: burn local assets, forward XCM to reserve chain to move reserves from this chain's SA to `dest` chain's SA, and forward another XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`. - for teleports: burn local assets and forward XCM to `dest` chain to mint/teleport assets and deposit them to `beneficiary`. ## Review notes Only around 500 lines are prod code (see `pallet_xcm/src/lib.rs`), the rest of the PR is new tests and improving existing tests. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Dec 05, 2023
-
-
gupnik authored
-
- Nov 30, 2023
-
-
joe petrowski authored
Follow up to fix a bug from #1814 discovered in XCM emulator testing. I mistakenly thought that checking out an asset would withdraw it from the sender. This actually withdraws the asset before checking out. --------- Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 29, 2023
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
The `BlockNumber` and `Hash` are fixed types any way.
-
- Nov 28, 2023
-
-
s0me0ne-unkn0wn authored
Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vladimir Istyufeev <[email protected]>
-
Ross Bulat authored
Addresses #409. This request has been raised by multiple community members - the ability for the nomination pool root role to configure permissionless commission claiming: > Would it be possible to have a claim_commission_other extrinsic for claiming commission of nomination pools permissionless? This PR does not quite introduce this additional call, but amends `do_claim_commission` to check a new `claim_permission` field in the `Commission` struct, configured by an enum: ``` enum CommissionClaimPermission { Permissionless, Account(AccountId), } ``` This can be optionally set in a bonded pool's `commission.claim_permission` field: ``` struct BondedPool { commission: { <snip> claim_permission: Option<CommissionClaimPermission<T::AccountId>>, }, <snip> } ``` This is a new field and requires a migration to add it to existing pools. This will be `None` on pool creation, falling back to the `root` role having sole access to claim commission if it is not set; this is the behaviour as it is today. Once set, the field _can_ be set to `None` again. #### Changes - [x] Add `commision.claim_permission` field. - [x] Add `can_claim_commission` and amend `do_claim_commission`. - [x] Add `set_commission_claim_permission` call. - [x] Test to cover new configs and call. - [x] Add and amend benchmarks. - [x] Generate new weights + slot into call `set_commission_claim_permission`. - [x] Add migration to introduce `commission.claim_permission`, bump storage version. - [x] Update Westend weights. - [x] Migration working. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Nov 27, 2023
-
-
Chevdor authored
## Overview This PR aligns the `spec_version` formatting to the [recent changes](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/26/files#diff-efa4caeb17487ecb13d8f5eb7863c3241d84afa2e73fbf25909a2ca89df0f362R142) made for the Polkadot/Kusama runtimes. It also backports the latest version `v1.4.0` bumps as `1_004_000`. ## Details During the switch from `v0.9` to `v1.x`, the format of the `spec_version` was modified from: `(M)m_ppp` for a runtime considered on version `M.m.pp`. For instance `0.9.42` had a `spec_version` of `9420`. With the transition to `v1.x`, the format was changed to a bigger number (still `u32`) formatted as `MM_mm_ppp` where `1.2.3` would be stored as `01_02_003`. This PR aligns the format with that has been introduced in the fellowship repo: `MMM_mmm_ppp`. --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 22, 2023
-
-
Ross Bulat authored
Deprecates `RewardDestination::Controller` variant. - [x] `RewardDestination::Controller` annotated with `#[deprecated]`. - [x] `Controller` variant is now handled the same way as `Stash` in `payout_stakers`. - [x] `set_payee` errors if `RewardDestination::Controller` is provided. - [x] Added `update_payee` call to lazily migrate `RewardDestination::Controller` `Payee` storage entries to `RewardDestination::Account(controller)` . - [x] `payout_stakers_dead_controller` has been removed from benches & weights - was not used. - [x] Tests no longer use `RewardDestination::Controller`. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]>
-