Skip to content
  1. Nov 22, 2023
    • Ross Bulat's avatar
      Deprecate `RewardDestination::Controller` (#2380) · 7a32f4be
      Ross Bulat authored
      
      
      Deprecates `RewardDestination::Controller` variant.
      
      - [x] `RewardDestination::Controller` annotated with `#[deprecated]`.
      - [x] `Controller` variant is now handled the same way as `Stash` in
      `payout_stakers`.
      - [x] `set_payee` errors if `RewardDestination::Controller` is provided.
      - [x] Added `update_payee` call to lazily migrate
      `RewardDestination::Controller` `Payee` storage entries to
      `RewardDestination::Account(controller)` .
      - [x] `payout_stakers_dead_controller` has been removed from benches &
      weights - was not used.
      - [x] Tests no longer use `RewardDestination::Controller`.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarGonçalo Pestana <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
      7a32f4be
  2. Nov 17, 2023
    • Bruno Galvao's avatar
      add pallet nomination-pools versioned migration to kitchensink (#2167) · 596088a2
      Bruno Galvao authored
      The versioned migrations are already there in pallet nomination-pools:
      
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/f6ee4781/substrate/frame/nomination-pools/src/migration.rs#L27-L48
      
      Just updating the kitchensink runtime to point to them.
      
      This is also nice because it points the dev to an example of how to use
      `VersionedMigration`.
      596088a2
  3. Nov 16, 2023
  4. Nov 15, 2023
    • joe petrowski's avatar
      Identity Deposits Relay to Parachain Migration (#1814) · c79b234b
      joe petrowski authored
      The goal of this PR is to migrate Identity deposits from the Relay Chain
      to a system parachain.
      
      The problem I want to solve is that `IdentityOf` and `SubsOf` both store
      an amount that's held in reserve as a storage deposit. When migrating to
      a parachain, we can take a snapshot of the actual `IdentityInfo` and
      sub-account mappings, but should migrate (off chain) the `deposit`s to
      zero, since the chain (and by extension, accounts) won't have any funds
      at genesis.
      
      The good news is that we expect parachain deposits to be significantly
      lower (possibly 100x) on the parachain. That is, a deposit of 21 DOT on
      the Relay Chain would need 0.21 DOT on a parachain. This PR proposes to
      migrate the deposits in the following way:
      
      1. Introduces a new pallet with two extrinsics: 
      - `reap_identity`: Has a configurable `ReapOrigin`, which would be set
      to `EnsureSigned` on the Relay Chain (i.e. callable by anyone) and
      `EnsureRoot` on the parachain (we don't want identities reaped from
      there).
      - `poke_deposit`: Checks what deposit the pallet holds (at genesis,
      zero) and attempts to update the amount based on the calculated deposit
      for storage data.
      2. `reap_identity` clears all storage data for a `target` account and
      unreserves their deposit.
      3. A `ReapIdentityHandler` teleports the necessary DOT to the parachain
      and calls `poke_deposit`. Since the parachain deposit is much lower, and
      was just unreserved, we know we have enough.
      
      One awkwardness I ran into was that the XCMv3 instruction set does not
      provide a way for the system to teleport assets without a fee being
      deducted on reception. Users shouldn't have to pay a fee for the system
      to migrate their info to a more efficient location. So I wrote my own
      program and did the `InitiateTeleport` accounting on my own to send a
      program with `UnpaidExecution`. Have discussed an
      `InitiateUnpaidTeleport` instruction with @franciscoaguirre
      
       . Obviously
      any chain executing this would have to pass a `Barrier` for free
      execution.
      
      TODO:
      
      - [x] Confirm People Chain ParaId
      - [x] Confirm People Chain deposit rates (determined in
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2281)
      - [x] Add pallet to Westend
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      c79b234b
  5. Nov 14, 2023
    • Alin Dima's avatar
      add NodeFeatures field to HostConfiguration and runtime API (#2177) · fc12f435
      Alin Dima authored
      Adds a `NodeFeatures` bitfield value to the runtime `HostConfiguration`,
      with the purpose of coordinating the enabling of node-side features,
      such as: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/628 and
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/598.
      These are features that require all validators enable them at the same
      time, assuming all/most nodes have upgraded their node versions.
      
      This PR doesn't add any feature yet. These are coming in future PRs.
      
      Also adds a runtime API for querying the state of the client features
      and an extrinsic for setting/unsetting a feature by its index in the bitfield.
      
      Note: originally part of:
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1644, but posted as
      standalone to be reused by other PRs until the initial PR is merged
      fc12f435
  6. Nov 13, 2023
    • Adrian Catangiu's avatar
      pallet-xcm: enhance `reserve_transfer_assets` to support remote reserves (#1672) · 18257373
      Adrian Catangiu authored
      
      
      ## Motivation
      
      `pallet-xcm` is the main user-facing interface for XCM functionality,
      including assets manipulation functions like `teleportAssets()` and
      `reserve_transfer_assets()` calls.
      
      While `teleportAsset()` works both ways, `reserve_transfer_assets()`
      works only for sending reserve-based assets to a remote destination and
      beneficiary when the reserve is the _local chain_.
      
      ## Solution
      
      This PR enhances `pallet_xcm::(limited_)reserve_withdraw_assets` to
      support transfers when reserves are other chains.
      This will allow complete, **bi-directional** reserve-based asset
      transfers user stories using `pallet-xcm`.
      
      Enables following scenarios:
      - transferring assets with local reserve (was previously supported iff
      asset used as fee also had local reserve - now it works in all cases),
      - transferring assets with reserve on destination,
      - transferring assets with reserve on remote/third-party chain (iff
      assets and fees have same remote reserve),
      - transferring assets with reserve different than the reserve of the
      asset to be used as fees - meaning can be used to transfer random asset
      with local/dest reserve while using DOT for fees on all involved chains,
      even if DOT local/dest reserve doesn't match asset reserve,
      - transferring assets with any type of local/dest reserve while using
      fees which can be teleported between involved chains.
      
      All of the above is done by pallet inner logic without the user having
      to specify which scenario/reserves/teleports/etc. The correct scenario
      and corresponding XCM programs are identified, and respectively, built
      automatically based on runtime configuration of trusted teleporters and
      trusted reserves.
      
      #### Current limitations:
      - while `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CAN have different reserves (or
      fees CAN be teleported), the remaining "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT, among
      themselves, have different reserve locations (this is also implicitly
      enforced by `MAX_ASSETS_FOR_TRANSFER=2`, but this can be safely
      increased in the future).
      - `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT have **different remote**
      reserves (this could also be supported in the future, but adds even more
      complexity while possibly not being worth it - we'll see what the future
      holds).
      
      Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1584
      Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2055
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
      18257373
    • Bastian Köcher's avatar
      pallet-grandpa: Remove `GRANDPA_AUTHORITIES_KEY` (#2181) · ebcf0a0f
      Bastian Köcher authored
      
      
      Remove the `GRANDPA_AUTHORITIES_KEY` key and its usage. Apparently this
      was used in the early days to communicate the grandpa authorities to the
      node. However, we have now a runtime api that does this for us. So, this
      pull request is moving from the custom managed storage item to a FRAME
      managed storage item.
      
      This pr also includes a migration for doing the switch on a running
      chain.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDavide Galassi <[email protected]>
      ebcf0a0f
  7. Nov 10, 2023
    • PG Herveou's avatar
      Contracts: Add XCM traits to interface with contracts (#2086) · 6b7be115
      PG Herveou authored
      
      
      We are introducing a new set of `XcmController` traits (final name yet
      to be determined).
      These traits are implemented by `pallet-xcm` and allows other pallets,
      such as `pallet_contracts`, to rely on these traits instead of tight
      coupling them to `pallet-xcm`.
      
      Using only the existing Xcm traits would mean duplicating the logic from
      `pallet-xcm` in these other pallets, which we aim to avoid. Our
      objective is to ensure that when these APIs are called from
      `pallet-contracts`, they produce the exact same outcomes as if called
      directly from `pallet-xcm`.
      
      The other benefits is that we can also expose return values to
      `pallet-contracts` instead of just calling `pallet-xcm` dispatchable and
      getting a `DispatchResult` back.
      
      See traits integration in this PR
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1248, where the traits
      are used as follow to define and implement `pallet-contracts` Config.
      ```rs
      // Contracts config:
      pub trait Config: frame_system::Config {
        // ...
      
        /// A type that exposes XCM APIs, allowing contracts to interact with other parachains, and
        /// execute XCM programs.
        type Xcm: xcm_executor::traits::Controller<
      	  OriginFor<Self>,
      	  <Self as frame_system::Config>::RuntimeCall,
      	  BlockNumberFor<Self>,
        >;
      }
      
      // implementation
      impl pallet_contracts::Config for Runtime {
              // ...
      
      	type Xcm = pallet_xcm::Pallet<Self>;
      }
      ```
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexander Theißen <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      6b7be115
    • Liam Aharon's avatar
      Improve `VersionedMigration` naming conventions (#2264) · 84ddbaf6
      Liam Aharon authored
      As suggested by @ggwpez
      (https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2142#discussion_r1388145872),
      remove the `VersionChecked` prefix from version checked migrations (but
      leave `VersionUnchecked` prefixes)
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      84ddbaf6
  8. Nov 08, 2023
  9. Nov 06, 2023
  10. Nov 03, 2023
    • georgepisaltu's avatar
      Identity pallet improvements (#2048) · 21fbc00d
      georgepisaltu authored
      
      
      This PR is a follow up to #1661 
      
      - [x] rename the `simple` module to `legacy`
      - [x] fix benchmarks to disregard the number of additional fields
      - [x] change the storage deposits to charge per encoded byte of the
      identity information instance, removing the need for `fn
      additional(&self) -> usize` in `IdentityInformationProvider`
      - [x] ~add an extrinsic to rejig deposits to account for the change
      above~
      - [ ] ~ensure through proper configuration that the new byte-based
      deposit is always lower than whatever is reserved now~
      - [x] remove `IdentityFields` from the `set_fields` extrinsic signature,
      as per [this
      discussion](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1661#discussion_r1371703403)
      
      > ensure through proper configuration that the new byte-based deposit is
      always lower than whatever is reserved now
      
      Not sure this is needed anymore. If the new deposits are higher than
      what is currently on chain and users don't have enough funds to reserve
      what is needed, the extrinisc fails and they're basically grandfathered
      and frozen until they add more funds and/or make a change to their
      identity. This behavior seems fine to me. Original idea
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1661#issuecomment-1779606319).
      
      > add an extrinsic to rejig deposits to account for the change above
      
      This was initially implemented but now removed from this PR in favor of
      the implementation detailed
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2088).
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarjoepetrowski <[email protected]>
      21fbc00d
  11. Nov 01, 2023
    • Serban Iorga's avatar
    • Ankan's avatar
      [NPoS] Paging reward payouts in order to scale rewardable nominators (#1189) · 00b85c51
      Ankan authored
      
      
      helps https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/439.
      closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/473.
      
      PR link in the older substrate repository:
      https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/13498.
      
      # Context
      Rewards payout is processed today in a single block and limited to
      `MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator`. This number is currently 512 on both
      Kusama and Polkadot.
      
      This PR tries to scale the nominators payout to an unlimited count in a
      multi-block fashion. Exposures are stored in pages, with each page
      capped to a certain number (`MaxExposurePageSize`). Starting out, this
      number would be the same as `MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator`, but
      eventually, this number can be lowered through new runtime upgrades to
      limit the rewardeable nominators per dispatched call instruction.
      
      The changes in the PR are backward compatible.
      
      ## How payouts would work like after this change
      Staking exposes two calls, 1) the existing `payout_stakers` and 2)
      `payout_stakers_by_page`.
      
      ### payout_stakers
      This remains backward compatible with no signature change. If for a
      given era a validator has multiple pages, they can call `payout_stakers`
      multiple times. The pages are executed in an ascending sequence and the
      runtime takes care of preventing double claims.
      
      ### payout_stakers_by_page
      Very similar to `payout_stakers` but also accepts an extra param
      `page_index`. An account can choose to payout rewards only for an
      explicitly passed `page_index`.
      
      **Lets look at an example scenario**
      Given an active validator on Kusama had 1100 nominators,
      `MaxExposurePageSize` set to 512 for Era e. In order to pay out rewards
      to all nominators, the caller would need to call `payout_stakers` 3
      times.
      
      - `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the first 512
      nominators.
      - `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the second set of 512
      nominators.
      - `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the last set of 76
      nominators.
      ...
      - `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => calling it the 4th time would
      return an error `InvalidPage`.
      
      The above calls can also be replaced by `payout_stakers_by_page` and
      passing a `page_index` explicitly.
      
      ## Commission note
      Validator commission is paid out in chunks across all the pages where
      each commission chunk is proportional to the total stake of the current
      page. This implies higher the total stake of a page, higher will be the
      commission. If all the pages of a validator's single era are paid out,
      the sum of commission paid to the validator across all pages should be
      equal to what the commission would have been if we had a non-paged
      exposure.
      
      ### Migration Note
      Strictly speaking, we did not need to bump our storage version since
      there is no migration of storage in this PR. But it is still useful to
      mark a storage upgrade for the following reasons:
      
      - New storage items are introduced in this PR while some older storage
      items are deprecated.
      - For the next `HistoryDepth` eras, the exposure would be incrementally
      migrated to its corresponding paged storage item.
      - Runtimes using staking pallet would strictly need to wait at least
      `HistoryDepth` eras with current upgraded version (14) for the migration
      to complete. At some era `E` such that `E >
      era_at_which_V14_gets_into_effect + HistoryDepth`, we will upgrade to
      version X which will remove the deprecated storage items.
      In other words, it is a strict requirement that E<sub>x</sub> -
      E<sub>14</sub> > `HistoryDepth`, where
      E<sub>x</sub> = Era at which deprecated storages are removed from
      runtime,
      E<sub>14</sub> = Era at which runtime is upgraded to version 14.
      - For Polkadot and Kusama, there is a [tracker
      ticket](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/433) to clean
      up the deprecated storage items.
      
      ### Storage Changes
      
      #### Added
      - ErasStakersOverview
      - ClaimedRewards
      - ErasStakersPaged
      
      #### Deprecated
      The following can be cleaned up after 84 eras which is tracked
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/433).
      
      - ErasStakers.
      - ErasStakersClipped.
      - StakingLedger.claimed_rewards, renamed to
      StakingLedger.legacy_claimed_rewards.
      
      ### Config Changes
      - Renamed MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator to MaxExposurePageSize.
      
      ### TODO
      - [x] Tracker ticket for cleaning up the old code after 84 eras.
      - [x] Add companion.
      - [x] Redo benchmarks before merge.
      - [x] Add Changelog for pallet_staking.
      - [x] Pallet should be configurable to enable/disable paged rewards.
      - [x] Commission payouts are distributed across pages.
      - [x] Review documentation thoroughly.
      - [x] Rename `MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator` ->
      `MaxExposurePageSize`.
      - [x] NMap for `ErasStakersPaged`.
      - [x] Deprecate ErasStakers.
      - [x] Integrity tests.
      
      ### Followup issues
      [Runtime api for deprecated ErasStakers storage
      item](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/426)
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJavier Viola <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarRoss Bulat <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      00b85c51
  12. Oct 31, 2023
    • Adel Arja's avatar
      1953 defensive testing extrinsic (#1998) · 6e2f94f8
      Adel Arja authored
      
      
      # Description
      
      The `trigger_defensive` call has been added to the `root-testing`
      pallet. The idea is to have this pallet running on `Rococo/Westend` and
      use it to verify if the runtime monitoring works end-to-end.
      
      To accomplish this, `trigger_defensive` dispatches an event when it is
      called.
      
      Closes #1953
      
      # Checklist
      
      - [x] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the
      "Description" section above
      - [ ] My PR follows the [labeling requirements](CONTRIBUTING.md#Process)
      of this project (at minimum one label for `T`
        required)
      - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if
      applicable)
      - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
      feature works (if applicable)
      
      You can remove the "Checklist" section once all have been checked. Thank
      you for your contribution!
      
      ✄
      -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      6e2f94f8
  13. Oct 24, 2023
    • georgepisaltu's avatar
      Make `IdentityInfo` generic in `pallet-identity` (#1661) · 91851951
      georgepisaltu authored
      Fixes #179 
      
      # Description
      
      This PR makes the structure containing identity information used in
      `pallet-identity` generic through the pallet `Config`. Additionally, the
      old structure is now available in a separate module called `simple`
      (pending rename) and is compatible with the new interface.
      
      Another change in this PR is that while the `additional` field in
      `IdentityInfo` stays for backwards compatibility reasons, the associated
      costs are stil present in the pallet through the `additional` function
      in the `IdentityInformationProvider` interface. This function is marked
      as deprecated as it is only a temporary solution to the backwards
      compatibility problem we had. In short, we could have removed the
      additional fields in the struct and done a migration, but we chose to
      wait and do it off-chain through the genesis of the system parachain.
      After we move the identity pallet to the parachain, additional fields
      will be migrated into the existing fields and the `additional` key-value
      store will be removed. Until that happens, this interface will provide
      the necessary information to properly account for the associated costs.
      
      Additionally, this PR fixes an unrelated issue; the `IdentityField` enum
      used to represent the fields as bitflags couldn't store more than 8
      fields, even though it was marked as `#[repr(u64)]`. This was because of
      the `derive` implementation of `TypeInfo`, which assumed `u8` semantics.
      The custom implementation of this trait in
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/commit/0105cc03
      
      
      fixes the issue.
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarSam Johnson <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarjoe petrowski <[email protected]>
      91851951
    • Kian Paimani's avatar
      Ensure correct variant count in `Runtime[Hold/Freeze]Reason` (#1900) · 35eb133b
      Kian Paimani authored
      
      
      closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1882
      
      ## Breaking Changes
      
      This PR introduces a new item to `pallet_balances::Config`:
      
      ```diff
      trait Config {
      ++    type RuntimeFreezeReasons;
      }
      ```
      
      This value is only used to check it against `type MaxFreeze`. A similar
      check has been added for `MaxHolds` against `RuntimeHoldReasons`, which
      is already given to `pallet_balances`.
      
      In all contexts, you should pass the real `RuntimeFreezeReasons`
      generated by `construct_runtime` to `type RuntimeFreezeReasons`. Passing
      `()` would also work, but it would imply that the runtime uses no
      freezes at all.
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      35eb133b
  14. Oct 23, 2023
    • joe petrowski's avatar
      Re-enable Identity on Westend and Rococo (#1901) · 95052437
      joe petrowski authored
      Reverts https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1476
      
      The `lock_pallet` / `unlock_pallet` additions in
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1814 will result in less
      downtime for users than using runtime upgrades.
      95052437
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      Remove `(rococo/westend)-runtime` deps from testnet AssetHubs (#1979) · c284a931
      Branislav Kontur authored
      ## Problem
      
      This PR addresses the issue with testnet AssetHub builds, which was
      discovered during the execution of `bot bench`.
      
      https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/4038738
      ```
           Compiling asset-hub-rococo-runtime-wasm v1.0.0 (/builds/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/target/production/wbuild/asset-hub-rococo-runtime)
        warning: Linking globals named 'Core_version': symbol multiply defined!
        error: failed to load bitcode of module "rococo_runtime-8799ee884447805a.rococo_runtime.0bc572b8-cgu.0.rcgu.o": 
        warning: `asset-hub-rococo-runtime-wasm` (lib) generated 1 warning
        error: could not compile `asset-hub-rococo-runtime-wasm` (lib) due to previous error; 1 warning emitted
      ```
      
      https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/4038739
      ```
      Compiling asset-hub-westend-runtime-wasm v1.0.0 (/builds/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/target/production/wbuild/asset-hub-westend-runtime)
        warning: Linking globals named 'Core_version': symbol multiply defined!
        error: failed to load bitcode of module "westend_runtime-86d7844430f97d5c.westend_runtime.b7678d03-cgu.0.rcgu.o": 
        warning: `asset-hub-westend-runtime-wasm` (lib) generated 1 warning
        error: could not compile `asset-hub-westend-runtime-wasm` (lib) due to previous error; 1 warning emitted
      ```
      
      ## Solution
      
      - Removed dependencies on `rococo-runtime` and `westend-runtime`
      introduced by [this
      PR](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1234/files#diff-a86375df98e04ca3cce1ea35c40257a222e2d5087f5f528ff33307678b78dc2dR534-R550).
      - Replaced `<rococo_runtime::Treasury as PalletInfoAccess>::index()`
      with `rococo_runtime_constants::TREASURY_PALLET_ID`.
      - Added `check_treasury_pallet_id` to the relay runtimes to ensure that
      the constant is aligned with the pallet id.
      - Added "Rococo Treasury" to the waived locations (that will not be
      charged fees in the executor) for `BridgeHubRococo` (to be aligned with
      AssetHubs).
      
      ## References
      
      [Full element discussion
      here](https://matrix.to/#/!JUeaZUiYbdrvzvtwSL:parity.io/$2PnjYMsWRjR7M3oOfGuRI0XkjdoqJLtRcAPVcDLuLVg?via=parity.io&via=web3.foundation).
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      c284a931
  15. Oct 18, 2023
    • Keith Yeung's avatar
      Introduce XcmFeesToAccount fee manager (#1234) · 3dece311
      Keith Yeung authored
      
      
      Combination of paritytech/polkadot#7005, its addon PR
      paritytech/polkadot#7585 and its companion paritytech/cumulus#2433.
      
      This PR introduces a new XcmFeesToAccount struct which implements the
      `FeeManager` trait, and assigns this struct as the `FeeManager` in the
      XCM config for all runtimes.
      
      The struct simply deposits all fees handled by the XCM executor to a
      specified account. In all runtimes, the specified account is configured
      as the treasury account.
      
      XCM __delivery__ fees are now being introduced (unless the root origin
      is sending a message to a system parachain on behalf of the originating
      chain).
      
      # Note for reviewers
      
      Most file changes are tests that had to be modified to account for the
      new fees.
      Main changes are in:
      - cumulus/pallets/xcmp-queue/src/lib.rs <- To make it track the delivery
      fees exponential factor
      - polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/fee_handling.rs <- Added. Has the
      FeeManager implementation
      - All runtime xcm_config files <- To add the FeeManager to the XCM
      configuration
      
      # Important note
      
      After this change, instructions that create and send a new XCM (Query*,
      Report*, ExportMessage, InitiateReserveWithdraw, InitiateTeleport,
      DepositReserveAsset, TransferReserveAsset, LockAsset and RequestUnlock)
      will require the corresponding origin account in the origin register to
      pay for transport delivery fees, and the onward message will fail to be
      sent if the origin account does not have the required amount. This
      delivery fee is on top of what we already collect as tx fees in
      pallet-xcm and XCM BuyExecution fees!
      
      Wallet UIs that want to expose the new delivery fee can do so using the
      formula:
      
      ```
      delivery_fee_factor * (base_fee + encoded_msg_len * per_byte_fee)
      ```
      
      where the delivery fee factor can be obtained from the corresponding
      pallet based on which transport you are using (UMP, HRMP or bridges),
      the base fee is a constant, the encoded message length from the message
      itself and the per byte fee is the same as the configured per byte fee
      for txs (i.e. `TransactionByteFee`).
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarjoe petrowski <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarGiles Cope <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarLiam Aharon <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarKian Paimani <[email protected]>
      3dece311
    • Adrian Catangiu's avatar
      cumulus: add asset-hub-rococo runtime based on asset-hub-kusama and add... · 8b3905d2
      Adrian Catangiu authored
      
      cumulus: add asset-hub-rococo runtime based on asset-hub-kusama and add asset-bridging support to it (#1215)
      
      This commit adds Rococo Asset Hub dedicated runtime so we can test new
      features here, before merging them in Kusama Asset Hub.
      Also adds one such feature: asset transfer over bridge (Rococo AssetHub
      <> Wococo AssetHub)
      
      - clone `asset-hub-kusama-runtime` -> `asset-hub-rococo-runtime`
      - make it use Rococo primitives, names, assets, constants, etc
      - add asset-transfer-over-bridge support to Rococo AssetHub <> Wococo
      AssetHub
      
      Fixes #1128
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarjoe petrowski <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
      8b3905d2
  16. Oct 12, 2023
  17. Oct 10, 2023
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      [xcm] Use `Weight::MAX` for `reserve_asset_deposited`,... · e3c97e48
      Branislav Kontur authored
      [xcm] Use `Weight::MAX` for `reserve_asset_deposited`, `receive_teleported_asset` benchmarks (#1726)
      
      # Description
      
      ## Summary
      
      Previously, the `pallet_xcm::do_reserve_transfer_assets` and
      `pallet_xcm::do_teleport_assets` functions relied on weight estimation
      for remote chain execution, which was based on guesswork derived from
      the local chain. This approach led to complications for runtimes that
      did not provide or support specific [XCM
      configurations](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76/polkadot/xcm/xcm-executor/src/config.rs#L43-L47)
      for `IsReserve` or `IsTeleporter`. Consequently, such runtimes had to
      resort to implementing hard-coded weights for XCM instructions like
      `reserve_asset_deposited` or `receive_teleported_asset` to support
      extrinsics such as `pallet_xcm::reserve_transfer_assets` and
      `pallet_xcm::teleport_assets`, which depended on remote weight
      estimation.
      
      The issue of remote weight estimation was addressed and resolved by
      [Pull Request
      #1645](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1645), which
      removed the need for remote weight estimation.
      
      ## Solution
      
      As a continuation of this improvement, the current PR proposes further
      cleanup by removing unnecessary hard-coded values and rectifying
      benchmark results with `Weight::MAX` that previously used
      `T::BlockWeights::get().max_block` as an override for unsupported XCM
      instructions like `ReserveAssetDeposited` and `ReceiveTeleportedAsset`.
      
      
      ## Questions
      
      - [x] Can we remove now also `Hardcoded till the XCM pallet is fixed`
      for `deposit_asset`? E.g. for AssetHubKusama
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76/cumulus/parachains/runtimes/assets/asset-hub-kusama/src/weights/xcm/mod.rs#L129-L134)
      - [x] Are comments like
      [this](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76/polkadot/runtime/kusama/src/weights/xcm/mod.rs#L94)
      `// Kusama doesn't support ReserveAssetDeposited, so this benchmark has
      a default weight` still relevant? Shouldnt be removed/changed?
      
      
      ## TODO
      
      - [x] `bench bot` regenerate xcm weights for all runtimes
      - [x] remove hard-coded stuff from system parachain weight files
      - [ ] when merged, open `polkadot-fellow/runtimes` PR
      
      ## References
      
      Fixes #1132
      Closes #1132
      Old polkadot repo [PR](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7546)
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      e3c97e48
  18. Oct 07, 2023
    • Muharem Ismailov's avatar
      Treasury spends various asset kinds (#1333) · cb944dc5
      Muharem Ismailov authored
      
      
      ### Summary 
      
      This PR introduces new dispatchables to the treasury pallet, allowing
      spends of various asset types. The enhanced features of the treasury
      pallet, in conjunction with the asset-rate pallet, are set up and
      enabled for Westend and Rococo.
      
      ### Westend and Rococo runtimes.
      
      Polkadot/Kusams/Rococo Treasury can accept proposals for `spends` of
      various asset kinds by specifying the asset's location and ID.
      
      #### Treasury Instance New Dispatchables:
      - `spend(AssetKind, AssetBalance, Beneficiary, Option<ValidFrom>)` -
      propose and approve a spend;
      - `payout(SpendIndex)` - payout an approved spend or retry a failed
      payout
      - `check_payment(SpendIndex)` - check the status of a payout;
      - `void_spend(SpendIndex)` - void previously approved spend;
      > existing spend dispatchable renamed to spend_local
      
      in this context, the `AssetKind` parameter contains the asset's location
      and it's corresponding `asset_id`, for example:
      `USDT` on `AssetHub`,
      ``` rust
      location = MultiLocation(0, X1(Parachain(1000)))
      asset_id = MultiLocation(0, X2(PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)))
      ```
      
      the `Beneficiary` parameter is a `MultiLocation` in the context of the
      asset's location, for example
      ``` rust
      // the Fellowship salary pallet's location / account
      FellowshipSalaryPallet = MultiLocation(1, X2(Parachain(1001), PalletInstance(64)))
      // or custom `AccountId`
      Alice = MultiLocation(0, AccountId32(network: None, id: [1,...]))
      ```
      
      the `AssetBalance` represents the amount of the `AssetKind` to be
      transferred to the `Beneficiary`. For permission checks, the asset
      amount is converted to the native amount and compared against the
      maximum spendable amount determined by the commanding spend origin.
      
      the `spend` dispatchable allows for batching spends with different
      `ValidFrom` arguments, enabling milestone-based spending. If the
      expectations tied to an approved spend are not met, it is possible to
      void the spend later using the `void_spend` dispatchable.
      
      Asset Rate Pallet provides the conversion rate from the `AssetKind` to
      the native balance.
      
      #### Asset Rate Instance Dispatchables:
      - `create(AssetKind, Rate)` - initialize a conversion rate to the native
      balance for the given asset
      - `update(AssetKind, Rate)` - update the conversion rate to the native
      balance for the given asset
      - `remove(AssetKind)` - remove an existing conversion rate to the native
      balance for the given asset
      
      the pallet's dispatchables can be executed by the Root or Treasurer
      origins.
      
      ### Treasury Pallet
      
      Treasury Pallet can accept proposals for `spends` of various asset kinds
      and pay them out through the implementation of the `Pay` trait.
      
      New Dispatchables:
      - `spend(Config::AssetKind, AssetBalance, Config::Beneficiary,
      Option<ValidFrom>)` - propose and approve a spend;
      - `payout(SpendIndex)` - payout an approved spend or retry a failed
      payout;
      - `check_payment(SpendIndex)` - check the status of a payout;
      - `void_spend(SpendIndex)` - void previously approved spend;
      > existing spend dispatchable renamed to spend_local
      
      The parameters' types of the `spend` dispatchable exposed via the
      pallet's `Config` and allows to propose and accept a spend of a certain
      amount.
      
      An approved spend can be claimed via the `payout` within the
      `Config::SpendPeriod`. Clients provide an implementation of the `Pay`
      trait which can pay an asset of the `AssetKind` to the `Beneficiary` in
      `AssetBalance` units.
      
      The implementation of the Pay trait might not have an immediate final
      payment status, for example if implemented over `XCM` and the actual
      transfer happens on a remote chain.
      
      The `check_status` dispatchable can be executed to update the spend's
      payment state and retry the `payout` if the payment has failed.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarjoe petrowski <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      cb944dc5
  19. Oct 01, 2023
    • Piet's avatar
      Tvl pool staking (#1322) · e8baac78
      Piet authored
      What does this PR do?
      - Introduced the TotalValueLocked storage for nomination-pools. 
      - introduced a slashing api in mock.rs 
      - additional test for tracking a slashing event towards a pool without
      sub-pools
      - migration for the nomination-pools (V6 to V7) with
      `VersionedMigration`
      
      Why are these changes needed?
      this is the continuation of the work by @Kianenigma
      
       in this
      [PR](https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/13319)
      
      How were these changes implemented and what do they affect?
      - It's an extra StorageValue that's modified whenever funds flow in or
      out of staking for any of the `bonded_account` of `BondedPools`
      - The `PoolSlashed`event is now emitted even when no `SubPools` are
      found
      
      Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/155
      KSM: HHEEgVzcqL3kCXgsxSfJMbsTy8dxoTctuXtpY94n4s8F4pS
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarLiam Aharon <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarKian Paimani <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAnkan <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAnkan <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      e8baac78
  20. Sep 29, 2023
    • Ankan's avatar
      [NPoS] Fix for Reward Deficit in the pool (#1255) · f820dc0a
      Ankan authored
      closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/158.
      partially addresses
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/226.
      
      Instead of fragile calculation of current balance by looking at `free
      balance - ED`, Nomination Pool now freezes ED in the pool reward account
      to restrict an account from going below minimum balance. This also has a
      nice side effect that if ED changes, we know how much is the imbalance
      in ED frozen in the pool and the current required ED. A pool operator
      can diligently top up the pool with the deficit in ED or vice versa,
      withdraw the excess they transferred to the pool.
      
      ## Notable changes
      - New call `adjust_pool_deposit`: Allows to top up the deficit or
      withdraw the excess deposited funds to the pool.
      - Uses Fungible trait (instead of Currency trait). Since NP was not
      doing any locking/reserving previously, no migration is needed for this.
      - One time migration of freezing ED from each of the existing pools (not
      very PoV friendly but fine for relay chain).
      f820dc0a
  21. Sep 27, 2023
    • Alejandro Martinez Andres's avatar
      OpenGov in Westend and Rococo (#1177) · 69ed3087
      Alejandro Martinez Andres authored
      
      
      Migrating [PR from the archived polkadot
      repo](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7272)
      
      As per
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7272#issuecomment-1559240466,
      the changes in this MR include the following pallets into [x] Rococo and
      [x] Westend runtimes:
      
          pallet_conviction_voting
          pallet_referenda
          pallet_ranked_collective
          pallet_custom_origins
          pallet_whitelist
      
      And only for westend-runtime:
      
          pallet_treasury
      
      Following [Kusama runtime
      config](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/tree/dbae30efe080a1d41fe54ef4da8af47614c9ca93/runtime/kusama/src)
      as a baseline.
      
      Benchmarking of the following pallets done for both Rococo and Westend:
      
          pallet_conviction_voting
          pallet_referenda
          pallet_ranked_collective (only on Rococo)
          pallet_whitelist
      
      And only for Westend:
      
          pallet_treasury
      
      Removed Gov1 from Rococo as in
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6701
      
      Rococo Gov1 storage will be cleaned in a different PR - [issue ](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1618)
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarGiles Cope <[email protected]>
      69ed3087
    • Chris Sosnin's avatar
      Migrate polkadot-primitives to v6 (#1543) · 7cbe0c76
      Chris Sosnin authored
      
      
      - Async-backing related primitives are stable `primitives::v6`
      - Async-backing API is now part of `api_version(7)`
      - It's enabled on Rococo and Westend runtimes
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
      7cbe0c76
    • Michal Kucharczyk's avatar
      genesis-builder: implemented for all runtimes (#1492) · 5a2833cc
      Michal Kucharczyk authored
      This PR implements [`GenesisBuilder`
      API](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/a414ea75
      
      /substrate/primitives/genesis-builder/src/lib.rs#L38)
      for all the runtimes in polkadot repo.
      
      Step towards: paritytech/polkadot-sdk#25
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarordian <[email protected]>
      5a2833cc
  22. Sep 20, 2023
    • joe petrowski's avatar
      Disable Calls to Identity Pallet (#1476) · 771c3fbd
      joe petrowski authored
      This PR filters calls from the Identity pallet from all Relay Chain
      runtimes as preparation to move the identity state and logic to a system
      parachain within each network.
      
      After this change is deployed to a runtime, no more changes such as
      adding new sub-identities will be possible. The frozen state will be
      part of the genesis state of the system chain. After the system chain
      launches, the pallet and all state will be removed from each Relay
      Chain.
      
      Applications and UIs that render display information from this pallet
      will need to read from the system chain when it launches.
      771c3fbd
  23. Sep 19, 2023
    • Xiliang Chen's avatar
      allow governance body on parachain to have sovereign account (#1291) · cdbdbc75
      Xiliang Chen authored
      The goal is to allow Fellowship on Collective chain to have a sovereign
      account on Polkadot so that we can add it as an identity registrar. This
      will allow Fellows origin to be able to provide judgements for
      Fellowship members.
      
      This currently allow any body on any parachain including non system
      parachains to have sovereign account. I cannot think of any reason why
      that may be an issue but let me know if I should change it to filter
      only system parachains.
      
      [This](https://gist.github.com/xlc/ec61bfa4e9f6d62da27d30141ad2c72b) is
      the testing script.
      
      Original PR: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7518
      cdbdbc75
    • joe petrowski's avatar
      Add Method to Establish HRMP Channels Among System Parachains (#1473) · 2d96c8d2
      joe petrowski authored
      
      
      Solution to establish HRMP channels between system parachains.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarMuharem Ismailov <[email protected]>
      2d96c8d2
  24. Sep 18, 2023
    • Gonçalo Pestana's avatar
      Implements a variable deposit base calculation for EPM signed submissions (#1547) · 614aa31b
      Gonçalo Pestana authored
      **Note**: This is a lift-and-shift PR from the old substrate and
      polkadot repos, both PRs have been reviewed and audited
      (https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/13983,
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7140)
      
      ---
      
      This PR implements a generic `BaseDeposit` calculation for signed
      submissions, based on the size of the submission queue.
      
      It adds a new associated type to EPM's config, `type SignedDepositBase`,
      that implements `Convert<usize, BalanceOf<T>>`, which is used to
      calculate the base deposit for signed submissions based on the size of
      the signed submissions queue.
      
      `struct GeometricDepositBase<Balance, Fixed, Inc>` implements the
      convert trait so that the deposit value increases as a geometric
      progression. The deposit base is calculated by `deposit_base =
      fixed_deposit_base * (1 + increase_factor)^n`, where `n` is the term of
      the progression (i.e. the number of signed submissions in the queue).
      `Fixed` and `Inc` generic params are getters for `Balance` and
      `IncreaseFactor` to compute the geometric progression. If
      `IncreaseFactor = 0`, then the signed deposit is constant and equal to
      `Fixed` regardless of the size of the queue.
      
      ### Runtime configs
      
      In Kusama, the progression with 10% increase without changing the
      current signed fixed deposit is: (term == size of the queue)
      
      Term 1: `1,333,333,332,000`
      Term 2: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10 = 1,466,666,665,200`
      Term 3: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^2 = 1,613,333,331,200`
      Term 4: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^3 = 1,774,666,664,320`
      Term 5: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^4 = 1,952,133,330,752`
      Term 6: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^5 = 2,147,346,663,827.20`
      Term 7: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^6 = 2,362,081,330,210.92`
      Term 8: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^7 = 2,598,289,463,231.01`
      Term 9: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^8 = 2,858,118,409,554.11`
      Term 10: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^9 = 3,143,930,250,509.52`
      
      Westend:
      
      Term 1: `2,000,000,000,000`
      Term 2: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10 = 2,200,000,000,000`
      Term 3: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^2 = 2,420,000,000,000`
      Term 4: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^3 = 2,662,000,000,000`
      Term 5: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^4 = 2,928,200,000,000`
      Term 6: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^5 = 3,221,020,000,000`
      Term 7: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^6 = 3,543,122,000,000`
      Term 8: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^7 = 3,897,434,200,000`
      Term 9: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^8 = 4,287,177,620,000`
      Term 10: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^9 = 4,715,895,382,000`
      
      and in Polkadot, the deposit increase is disabled in the current state
      of the PR, as the increase factor is 0% -- so nothing changes from the
      current behaviour.
      
      Closes https://github.com/paritytech-secops/srlabs_findings/issues/189
      614aa31b
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      "Common good" vs "System" parachain clean up (#1406) · d569e728
      Branislav Kontur authored
      ## Summary 
      The term "common good parachain" has been abandoned in favor of "system
      parachain" - e.g. [Joe's speech at
      Decoded2023](https://youtu.be/CSO-ERHK2gY?t=456). This pull request
      tries to fix and align code with this vision.
      
      ## Impact
      
      The important change is implementation of `trait IsSystem` for `Id`
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1406/files#diff-0b7b4f5b962a18ce980354592b55ab2a27b5a2e9f6f8089ec803ca73853e8583R225-R229)
      where we changed condition from `< 1000` to `<= 1999`, which means that
      all parachain IDs bellow 1999 (included) are considered as "system
      parachain" IDs. This change has a direct impact on the following
      components:
      
      ####
      [ChildSystemParachainAsSuperuser](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/origin_conversion.rs#L72-L88)
      This origin converter is used for allowing to process XCM `Transact`
      from "system parachain" on the relay chain - e.g. see [configuration for
      Kusama](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/polkadot/runtime/kusama/src/xcm_config.rs#L92-L101).
      Only configured for Kusama, Westend, Rococo runtimes.
      
      **No need for this feature anymore.** See
      [comment](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1406#issuecomment-1708218715).
      
      ####
      [IsChildSystemParachain](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/barriers.rs#L310-L317)
      `IsChildSystemParachain` is used with `AllowExplicitUnpaidExecutionFrom`
      barrier for checking XCM programs (they have to start with
      `UnpaidExecution` instruction).
      Only configured for Kusama, Westend, Rococo runtimes.
      
      **Overall the impact is low or mostly ok because it only allows unpaid
      execution for "system parachains" (e.g. AssetHub, BridgeHub...) on the
      relay chain.**
      
      ####
      [SiblingSystemParachainAsSuperuser](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/origin_conversion.rs#L94-L114)
      
      Not used anywhere in `polkadot-sdk` repo.
      
      
      ## Unresolved Questions
      - [ ] constants `LOWEST_USER_ID` and `LOWEST_PUBLIC_ID` seem to express
      the same thing now, do we want to keep them both or deprecated one of
      them? If so, which one?
      - [x] determine impact for `ChildSystemParachainAsSuperuser`
      
      ## TODO
      
      - [ ] when merged here, open PR to the `polkadot-fellows`
      
      ## Related Material
      https://youtu.be/CSO-ERHK2gY?t=456
      
      https://forum.polkadot.network/t/polkadot-protocol-and-common-good-parachains/866
      https://wiki.polkadot.network/docs/learn-system-chains
      d569e728
  25. Sep 17, 2023
  26. Sep 09, 2023
  27. Sep 06, 2023
  28. Aug 31, 2023
    • Alin Dima's avatar
      backing: move the min votes threshold to the runtime (#1200) · d6af073a
      Alin Dima authored
      
      
      * move min backing votes const to runtime
      
      also cache it per-session in the backing subsystem
      
      Signed-off-by: default avataralindima <[email protected]>
      
      * add runtime migration
      
      * introduce api versioning for min_backing votes
      
      also enable it for rococo/versi for testing
      
      * also add min_backing_votes runtime calls to statement-distribution
      
      this dependency has been recently introduced by async backing
      
      * remove explicit version runtime API call
      
      this is not needed, as the RuntimeAPISubsystem already takes care
      of versioning and will return NotSupported if the version is not
      right.
      
      * address review comments
      
      - parametrise backing votes runtime API with session index
      - remove RuntimeInfo usage in backing subsystem, as runtime API
      caches the min backing votes by session index anyway.
      - move the logic for adjusting the configured needed backing votes with the size of the backing group
      to a primitives helper.
      - move the legacy min backing votes value to a primitives helper.
      - mark JoinMultiple error as fatal, since the Canceled (non-multiple) counterpart is also fatal.
      - make backing subsystem handle fatal errors for new leaves update.
      - add HostConfiguration consistency check for zeroed backing votes threshold
      - add cumulus accompanying change
      
      * fix cumulus test compilation
      
      * fix tests
      
      * more small fixes
      
      * fix merge
      
      * bump runtime api version for westend and rollback version for rococo
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avataralindima <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJavier Viola <[email protected]>
      d6af073a
    • Ignacio Palacios's avatar
      remove disable-runtime-api (#1328) · 80a19bec
      Ignacio Palacios authored
      80a19bec