Skip to content
  1. Apr 25, 2024
  3. Apr 24, 2024
  5. Apr 23, 2024
  7. Apr 22, 2024
  9. Apr 18, 2024
  11. Apr 17, 2024
    • Oliver Tale-Yazdi's avatar
      Fix nostd build of several crates (#4060) · 7a2c9d4a
      Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored 
      Preparation for https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3935

Changes:
- Add some `default-features = false` for the case that a crate and that
dependency both support nostd builds.
- Shuffle files around of some benchmarking-only crates. These
conditionally disabled the `cfg_attr` for nostd and pulled in libstd.
Example [here](https://github.com/ggwpez/zepter/pull/95

). The actual
logic is moved into a `inner.rs` to preserve nostd capability of the
crate in case the benchmarking feature is disabled.
- Add some `use sp_std::vec` where needed.
- Remove some `optional = true` in cases where it was not optional.
- Removed one superfluous `cfg_attr(not(feature = "std"), no_std..`.

All in all this should be logical no-op.

---------

Signed-off-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      7a2c9d4a
    • Sergej Sakac's avatar
      XCM coretime region transfers (#3455) · e6f3106d
      Sergej Sakac authored 
      This PR introduces changes enabling the transfer of coretime regions via
XCM.

TL;DR: There are two primary issues that are resolved in this PR:

1. The `mint` and `burn` functions were not implemented for coretime
regions. These operations are essential for moving assets to and from
the XCM holding register.
2. The transfer of non-fungible assets through XCM was previously
disallowed. This was due to incorrectly benchmarking non-fungible asset
transfers via XCM, which led to assigning it a weight of `Weight::Max`,
effectively preventing its execution.

### `mint_into` and `burn` implementation

This PR addresses the issue with cross-chain transferring regions back
to the Coretime chain. Remote reserve transfers are performed by
withdrawing and depositing the asset to and from the holding registry.
This requires the asset to support burning and minting functionality.

This PR adds burning and minting; however, they work a bit differently
than usual so that the associated region record is not lost when
burning. Instead of removing all the data, burning will set the owner of
the region to `None`, and when minting it back, it will set it to an
actual value. So, when cross-chain transferring, withdrawing into the
registry will remove the region from its original owner, and when
depositing it from the registry, it will set its owner to another
account

This was originally implemented in this PR: #3455, however we decided to
move all of it to this single PR
(https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3455#discussion_r1547324892)

### Fixes made in this PR

- Update the `XcmReserveTransferFilter` on coretime chain since it is
meant as a reserve chain for coretime regions.
- Update the XCM benchmark to use `AssetTransactor` instead of assuming
`pallet-balances` for fungible transfers.
- Update the XCM benchmark to properly measure weight consumption for
nonfungible reserve asset transfers. ATM reserve transfers via the
extrinsic do not work since the weight for it is set to `Weight::max()`.

Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/865



---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarDónal Murray <[email protected]>
      e6f3106d
  13. Apr 16, 2024
  15. Apr 12, 2024
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      Remove `xcm::v3` from `assets-common` nits (#4037) · 5601f286
      Branislav Kontur authored 
      This PR mainly removes `xcm::v3` stuff from `assets-common` to make it
more generic and facilitate the transition to newer XCM versions. Some
of the implementations here used hard-coded `xcm::v3::Location`, but now
it's up to the runtime to configure according to its needs.

Additional/consequent changes:
- `penpal` runtime uses now `xcm::latest::Location` for `pallet_assets`
as `AssetId`, because we don't care about migrations here
- it pretty much simplify xcm-emulator integration tests, where we don't
need now a lots of boilerplate conversions:
      ```
      v3::Location::try_from(...).expect("conversion works")`
      ```
- xcm-emulator tests
- split macro `impl_assets_helpers_for_parachain` to the
`impl_assets_helpers_for_parachain` and
`impl_foreign_assets_helpers_for_parachain` (avoids using hard-coded
`xcm::v3::Location`)
      5601f286
    • Adrian Catangiu's avatar
      pallet-xcm: add new extrinsic for asset transfers using explicit XCM transfer types (#3695) · 1e971b8d
      Adrian Catangiu authored 
      

# Description

Add `transfer_assets_using()` for transferring assets from local chain
to destination chain using explicit XCM transfer types such as:
- `TransferType::LocalReserve`: transfer assets to sovereign account of
destination chain and forward a notification XCM to `dest` to mint and
deposit reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`.
- `TransferType::DestinationReserve`: burn local assets and forward a
notification to `dest` chain to withdraw the reserve assets from this
chain's sovereign account and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
- `TransferType::RemoteReserve(reserve)`: burn local assets, forward XCM
to `reserve` chain to move reserves from this chain's SA to `dest`
chain's SA, and forward another XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit
reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`. Typically the remote `reserve` is
Asset Hub.
- `TransferType::Teleport`: burn local assets and forward XCM to `dest`
chain to mint/teleport assets and deposit them to `beneficiary`.

By default, an asset's reserve is its origin chain. But sometimes we may
want to explicitly use another chain as reserve (as long as allowed by
runtime `IsReserve` filter).

This is very helpful for transferring assets with multiple configured
reserves (such as Asset Hub ForeignAssets), when the transfer strictly
depends on the used reserve.

E.g. For transferring Foreign Assets over a bridge, Asset Hub must be
used as the reserve location.

# Example usage scenarios

## Transfer bridged ethereum ERC20-tokenX between ecosystem parachains.

ERC20-tokenX is registered on AssetHub as a ForeignAsset by the
Polkadot<>Ethereum bridge (Snowbridge). Its asset_id is something like
`(parents:2, (GlobalConsensus(Ethereum), Address(tokenX_contract)))`.
Its _original_ reserve is Ethereum (only we can't use Ethereum as a
reserve in local transfers); but, since tokenX is also registered on
AssetHub as a ForeignAsset, we can use AssetHub as a reserve.

With this PR we can transfer tokenX from ParaA to ParaB while using
AssetHub as a reserve.

## Transfer AssetHub ForeignAssets between parachains

AssetA created on ParaA but also registered as foreign asset on Asset
Hub. Can use AssetHub as a reserve.

And all of the above can be done while still controlling transfer type
for `fees` so mixing assets in same transfer is supported.

# Tests

Added integration tests for showcasing:
- transferring local (not bridged) assets from parachain over bridge
using local Asset Hub reserve,
- transferring foreign assets from parachain to Asset Hub,
- transferring foreign assets from Asset Hub to parachain,
- transferring foreign assets from parachain to parachain using local
Asset Hub reserve.

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      1e971b8d
  17. Apr 04, 2024
  19. Apr 03, 2024
  21. Apr 02, 2024
    • Dastan's avatar
      migrations: prevent accidentally using unversioned migrations instead of... · e5427969
      Dastan authored 
      migrations: prevent accidentally using unversioned migrations instead of `VersionedMigration` (#3835)

closes #1324 

#### Problem
Currently, it is possible to accidentally use inner unversioned
migration instead of `VersionedMigration` since both implement
`OnRuntimeUpgrade`.

#### Solution

With this change, we make it clear that value of `Inner` is not intended
to be used directly. It is achieved by bounding `Inner` to new trait
`UncheckedOnRuntimeUpgrade`, which has the same interface (except
`unchecked_` prefix) as `OnRuntimeUpgrade`.

#### `try-runtime` functions

Since developers can implement `try-runtime` for `Inner` value in
`VersionedMigration` and have custom logic for it, I added the same
`try-runtime` functions to `UncheckedOnRuntimeUpgrade`. I looked for a
ways to not duplicate functions, but couldn't find anything that doesn't
significantly change the codebase. So I would appreciate If you have any
suggestions to improve this

cc @liamaharon

 @xlc 

polkadot address: 16FqwPZ8GRC5U5D4Fu7W33nA55ZXzXGWHwmbnE1eT6pxuqcT

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarLiam Aharon <[email protected]>
      e5427969
    • Serban Iorga's avatar
      Align dependencies with `parity-bridges-common` (#3937) · 8e95a3e1
      Serban Iorga authored 
      Working towards migrating the `parity-bridges-common` repo inside
`polkadot-sdk`. This PR upgrades some dependencies in order to align
them with the versions used in `parity-bridges-common`

Related to
https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2538
      8e95a3e1
    • Adrian Catangiu's avatar
      pallet-xcm: fix weights for all XTs and deprecate unlimited weight ones (#3927) · d0ebb850
      Adrian Catangiu authored 
      

Fix "double-weights" for extrinsics, use only the ones benchmarked in
the runtime.

Deprecate extrinsics that don't specify WeightLimit, remove their usage
across the repo.

---------

Signed-off-by: default avatarAdrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      d0ebb850
  23. Mar 27, 2024
  25. Mar 26, 2024
    • Pavel Orlov's avatar
      XCM Fee Payment Runtime API (#3607) · 3c972fc1
      Pavel Orlov authored 
      The PR provides API for obtaining:
- the weight required to execute an XCM message,
- a list of acceptable `AssetId`s for message execution payment,
- the cost of the weight in the specified acceptable `AssetId`.

It is meant to address an issue where one has to guess how much fee to
pay for execution. Also, at the moment, a client has to guess which
assets are acceptable for fee execution payment.
See the related issue
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/690.
With this API, a client is supposed to query the list of the supported
asset IDs (in the XCM version format the client understands), weigh the
XCM program the client wants to execute and convert the weight into one
of the acceptable assets. Note that the client is supposed to know what
program will be executed on what chains. However, having a small
companion JS library for the pallet-xcm and xtokens should be enough to
determine what XCM programs will be executed and where (since these
pallets compose a known small set of programs).
```Rust
pub trait XcmPaymentApi<Call>
	where
		Call: Codec,
	{
		/// Returns a list of acceptable payment assets.
		///
		/// # Arguments
		///
		/// * `xcm_version`: Version.
		fn query_acceptable_payment_assets(xcm_version: Version) -> Result<Vec<VersionedAssetId>, Error>;
		/// Returns a weight needed to execute a XCM.
		///
		/// # Arguments
		///
		/// * `message`: `VersionedXcm`.
		fn query_xcm_weight(message: VersionedXcm<Call>) -> Result<Weight, Error>;
		/// Converts a weight into a fee for the specified `AssetId`.
		///
		/// # Arguments
		///
		/// * `weight`: convertible `Weight`.
		/// * `asset`: `VersionedAssetId`.
		fn query_weight_to_asset_fee(weight: Weight, asset: VersionedAssetId) -> Result<u128, Error>;
		/// Get delivery fees for sending a specific `message` to a `destination`.
		/// These always come in a specific asset, defined by the chain.
		///
		/// # Arguments
		/// * `message`: The message that'll be sent, necessary because most delivery fees are based on the
		///   size of the message.
		/// * `destination`: The destination to send the message to. Different destinations may use
		///   different senders that charge different fees.
		fn query_delivery_fees(destination: VersionedLocation, message: VersionedXcm<()>) -> Result<VersionedAssets, Error>;
	}
```
An
[example](https://gist.github.com/PraetorP/4bc323ff85401abe253897ba990ec29d

)
of a client side code.

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarAdrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarDaniel Shiposha <[email protected]>
      3c972fc1
    • Dcompoze's avatar
      Fix spelling mistakes across the whole repository (#3808) · 002d9260
      Dcompoze authored 
      **Update:** Pushed additional changes based on the review comments.

**This pull request fixes various spelling mistakes in this
repository.**

Most of the changes are contained in the first **3** commits:

- `Fix spelling mistakes in comments and docs`

- `Fix spelling mistakes in test names`

- `Fix spelling mistakes in error messages, panic messages, logs and
tracing`

Other source code spelling mistakes are separated into individual
commits for easier reviewing:

- `Fix the spelling of 'authority'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'prev_enqueud_messages'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'endpoint'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'children'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSiblingSovereignAccount'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSudoAccount'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'insufficient'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PalletXcmExtrinsicsBenchmark'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'subtracted'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'CandidatePendingAvailability'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'exclusive'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'until'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'discriminator'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'nonexistent'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'subsystem'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'indices'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'committed'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'topology'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'response'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'beneficiary'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'formatted'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'UNKNOWN_PROOF_REQUEST'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'succeeded'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'reopened'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'proposer'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'InstantiationNonce'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'depositor'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'expiration'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'phantom'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'AggregatedKeyValue'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'randomness'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'defendant'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'AquaticMammal'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'transactions'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PassingTracingSubscriber'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'TxSignaturePayload'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'versioning'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'descendant'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'overridden'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'network'`

Let me know if this structure is adequate.

**Note:** The usage of the words `Merkle`, `Merkelize`, `Merklization`,
`Merkelization`, `Merkleization`, is somewhat inconsistent but I left it
as it is.

~~**Note:** In some places the term `Receival` is used to refer to
message reception, IMO `Reception` is the correct word here, but I left
it as it is.~~

~~**Note:** In some places the term `Overlayed` is used instead of the
more acceptable version `Overlaid` but I also left it as it is.~~

~~**Note:** In some places the term `Applyable` is used instead of the
correct version `Applicable` but I also left it as it is.~~

**Note:** Some usage of British vs American english e.g. `judgement` vs
`judgment`, `initialise` vs `initialize`, `optimise` vs `optimize` etc.
are both present in different places, but I suppose that's
understandable given the number of contributors.

~~**Note:** There is a spelling mistake in `.github/CODEOWNERS` but it
triggers errors in CI when I make changes to it, so I left it as it
is.~~
      002d9260
  27. Mar 22, 2024
  29. Mar 19, 2024
    • Juan Ignacio Rios's avatar
      Add HRMP notification handlers to the xcm-executor (#3696) · 8b3bf39a
      Juan Ignacio Rios authored 
      Currently the xcm-executor returns an `Unimplemented` error if it
receives any HRMP-related instruction.
What I propose here, which is what we are currently doing in our forked
executor at polimec, is to introduce a trait implemented by the executor
which will handle those instructions.

This way, if parachains want to keep the default behavior, they just use
`()` and it will return unimplemented, but they can also implement their
own logic to establish HRMP channels with other chains in an automated
fashion, without requiring to go through governance.

Our implementation is mentioned in the [polkadot HRMP
docs](https://arc.net/l/quote/hduiivbu

), and it was suggested to us to
submit a PR to add these changes to polkadot-sdk.

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      8b3bf39a
  31. Mar 15, 2024
  33. Mar 13, 2024
  35. Mar 04, 2024
    • Gavin Wood's avatar
      FRAME: Create `TransactionExtension` as a replacement for `SignedExtension` (#2280) · fd5f9292
      Gavin Wood authored 
      Closes #2160

First part of [Extrinsic
Horizon](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2415

)

Introduces a new trait `TransactionExtension` to replace
`SignedExtension`. Introduce the idea of transactions which obey the
runtime's extensions and have according Extension data (né Extra data)
yet do not have hard-coded signatures.

Deprecate the terminology of "Unsigned" when used for
transactions/extrinsics owing to there now being "proper" unsigned
transactions which obey the extension framework and "old-style" unsigned
which do not. Instead we have __*General*__ for the former and
__*Bare*__ for the latter. (Ultimately, the latter will be phased out as
a type of transaction, and Bare will only be used for Inherents.)

Types of extrinsic are now therefore:
- Bare (no hardcoded signature, no Extra data; used to be known as
"Unsigned")
- Bare transactions (deprecated): Gossiped, validated with
`ValidateUnsigned` (deprecated) and the `_bare_compat` bits of
`TransactionExtension` (deprecated).
  - Inherents: Not gossiped, validated with `ProvideInherent`.
- Extended (Extra data): Gossiped, validated via `TransactionExtension`.
  - Signed transactions (with a hardcoded signature).
  - General transactions (without a hardcoded signature).

`TransactionExtension` differs from `SignedExtension` because:
- A signature on the underlying transaction may validly not be present.
- It may alter the origin during validation.
- `pre_dispatch` is renamed to `prepare` and need not contain the checks
present in `validate`.
- `validate` and `prepare` is passed an `Origin` rather than a
`AccountId`.
- `validate` may pass arbitrary information into `prepare` via a new
user-specifiable type `Val`.
- `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to
`Implicit`/`implicit`. It is encoded *for the entire transaction* and
passed in to each extension as a new argument to `validate`. This
facilitates the ability of extensions to acts as underlying crypto.

There is a new `DispatchTransaction` trait which contains only default
function impls and is impl'ed for any `TransactionExtension` impler. It
provides several utility functions which reduce some of the tedium from
using `TransactionExtension` (indeed, none of its regular functions
should now need to be called directly).

Three transaction version discriminator ("versions") are now
permissible:
- 0b000000100: Bare (used to be called "Unsigned"): contains Signature
or Extra (extension data). After bare transactions are no longer
supported, this will strictly identify an Inherents only.
- 0b100000100: Old-school "Signed" Transaction: contains Signature and
Extra (extension data).
- 0b010000100: New-school "General" Transaction: contains Extra
(extension data), but no Signature.

For the New-school General Transaction, it becomes trivial for authors
to publish extensions to the mechanism for authorizing an Origin, e.g.
through new kinds of key-signing schemes, ZK proofs, pallet state,
mutations over pre-authenticated origins or any combination of the
above.

## Code Migration

### NOW: Getting it to build

Wrap your `SignedExtension`s in `AsTransactionExtension`. This should be
accompanied by renaming your aggregate type in line with the new
terminology. E.g. Before:

```rust
/// The SignedExtension to the basic transaction logic.
pub type SignedExtra = (
	/* snip */
	MySpecialSignedExtension,
);
/// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime.
pub type UncheckedExtrinsic =
	generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, SignedExtra>;
```

After:

```rust
/// The extension to the basic transaction logic.
pub type TxExtension = (
	/* snip */
	AsTransactionExtension<MySpecialSignedExtension>,
);
/// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime.
pub type UncheckedExtrinsic =
	generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, TxExtension>;
```

You'll also need to alter any transaction building logic to add a
`.into()` to make the conversion happen. E.g. Before:

```rust
fn construct_extrinsic(
		/* snip */
) -> UncheckedExtrinsic {
	let extra: SignedExtra = (
		/* snip */
		MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */),
	);
	let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), extra.clone()).unwrap();
	let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e));
	UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed(
		/* snip */
		Signature::Sr25519(signature),
		extra,
	)
}
```

After:

```rust
fn construct_extrinsic(
		/* snip */
) -> UncheckedExtrinsic {
	let tx_ext: TxExtension = (
		/* snip */
		MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */).into(),
	);
	let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), tx_ext.clone()).unwrap();
	let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e));
	UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed(
		/* snip */
		Signature::Sr25519(signature),
		tx_ext,
	)
}
```

### SOON: Migrating to `TransactionExtension`

Most `SignedExtension`s can be trivially converted to become a
`TransactionExtension`. There are a few things to know.

- Instead of a single trait like `SignedExtension`, you should now
implement two traits individually: `TransactionExtensionBase` and
`TransactionExtension`.
- Weights are now a thing and must be provided via the new function `fn
weight`.

#### `TransactionExtensionBase`

This trait takes care of anything which is not dependent on types
specific to your runtime, most notably `Call`.

- `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to
`Implicit`/`implicit`.
- Weight must be returned by implementing the `weight` function. If your
extension is associated with a pallet, you'll probably want to do this
via the pallet's existing benchmarking infrastructure.

#### `TransactionExtension`

Generally:
- `pre_dispatch` is now `prepare` and you *should not reexecute the
`validate` functionality in there*!
- You don't get an account ID any more; you get an origin instead. If
you need to presume an account ID, then you can use the trait function
`AsSystemOriginSigner::as_system_origin_signer`.
- You get an additional ticket, similar to `Pre`, called `Val`. This
defines data which is passed from `validate` into `prepare`. This is
important since you should not be duplicating logic from `validate` to
`prepare`, you need a way of passing your working from the former into
the latter. This is it.
- This trait takes two type parameters: `Call` and `Context`. `Call` is
the runtime call type which used to be an associated type; you can just
move it to become a type parameter for your trait impl. `Context` is not
currently used and you can safely implement over it as an unbounded
type.
- There's no `AccountId` associated type any more. Just remove it.

Regarding `validate`:
- You get three new parameters in `validate`; all can be ignored when
migrating from `SignedExtension`.
- `validate` returns a tuple on success; the second item in the tuple is
the new ticket type `Self::Val` which gets passed in to `prepare`. If
you use any information extracted during `validate` (off-chain and
on-chain, non-mutating) in `prepare` (on-chain, mutating) then you can
pass it through with this. For the tuple's last item, just return the
`origin` argument.

Regarding `prepare`:
- This is renamed from `pre_dispatch`, but there is one change:
- FUNCTIONALITY TO VALIDATE THE TRANSACTION NEED NOT BE DUPLICATED FROM
`validate`!!
- (This is different to `SignedExtension` which was required to run the
same checks in `pre_dispatch` as in `validate`.)

Regarding `post_dispatch`:
- Since there are no unsigned transactions handled by
`TransactionExtension`, `Pre` is always defined, so the first parameter
is `Self::Pre` rather than `Option<Self::Pre>`.

If you make use of `SignedExtension::validate_unsigned` or
`SignedExtension::pre_dispatch_unsigned`, then:
- Just use the regular versions of these functions instead.
- Have your logic execute in the case that the `origin` is `None`.
- Ensure your transaction creation logic creates a General Transaction
rather than a Bare Transaction; this means having to include all
`TransactionExtension`s' data.
- `ValidateUnsigned` can still be used (for now) if you need to be able
to construct transactions which contain none of the extension data,
however these will be phased out in stage 2 of the Transactions Horizon,
so you should consider moving to an extension-centric design.

## TODO

- [x] Introduce `CheckSignature` impl of `TransactionExtension` to
ensure it's possible to have crypto be done wholly in a
`TransactionExtension`.
- [x] Deprecate `SignedExtension` and move all uses in codebase to
`TransactionExtension`.
  - [x] `ChargeTransactionPayment`
  - [x] `DummyExtension`
  - [x] `ChargeAssetTxPayment` (asset-tx-payment)
  - [x] `ChargeAssetTxPayment` (asset-conversion-tx-payment)
  - [x] `CheckWeight`
  - [x] `CheckTxVersion`
  - [x] `CheckSpecVersion`
  - [x] `CheckNonce`
  - [x] `CheckNonZeroSender`
  - [x] `CheckMortality`
  - [x] `CheckGenesis`
  - [x] `CheckOnlySudoAccount`
  - [x] `WatchDummy`
  - [x] `PrevalidateAttests`
  - [x] `GenericSignedExtension`
  - [x] `SignedExtension` (chain-polkadot-bulletin)
  - [x] `RefundSignedExtensionAdapter`
- [x] Implement `fn weight` across the board.
- [ ] Go through all pre-existing extensions which assume an account
signer and explicitly handle the possibility of another kind of origin.
- [x] `CheckNonce` should probably succeed in the case of a non-account
origin.
- [x] `CheckNonZeroSender` should succeed in the case of a non-account
origin.
- [x] `ChargeTransactionPayment` and family should fail in the case of a
non-account origin.
  - [ ] 
- [x] Fix any broken tests.

---------

Signed-off-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandru Vasile <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: default avatardependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarNikhil Gupta <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarChevdor <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarMaciej <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarJavier Viola <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarMarcin S. <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarTsvetomir Dimitrov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarJavier Bullrich <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarKoute <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarAdrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Vladimir Istyufeev's avatarVladimir Istyufeev <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarRoss Bulat <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarGonçalo Pestana <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarLiam Aharon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarSvyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarAndré Silva <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatars0me0ne-unkn0wn <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarordian <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarSebastian Kunert <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarAaro Altonen <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarDmitry Markin <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexandru Vasile <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexander Samusev <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarJulian Eager <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarMichal Kucharczyk <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarDavide Galassi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarDónal Murray <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avataryjh <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarTom Mi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatardependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: default avatarWill | Paradox | ParaNodes.io <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarJoshy Orndorff <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarJoshy Orndorff <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarPG Herveou <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexander Theißen <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarKian Paimani <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarJuan Girini <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarbader y <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarJames Wilson <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarjoe petrowski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarasynchronous rob <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarParth <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarAndrew Jones <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarJonathan Udd <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarSerban Iorga <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarEgor_P <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarEvgeny Snitko <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarJust van Stam <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatargupnik <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatardzmitry-lahoda <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarzhiqiangxu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarNazar Mokrynskyi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarAnwesh <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarcheme <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarSam Johnson <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarkianenigma <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarJegor Sidorenko <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarMuharem <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarjoepetrowski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarGabriel Facco de Arruda <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarSquirrel <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      fd5f9292
  37. Mar 01, 2024
  39. Feb 26, 2024
  41. Feb 23, 2024
  43. Feb 20, 2024
  45. Feb 19, 2024
    • PG Herveou's avatar
      Contracts: xcm host fn fixes (#3086) · ca382f32
      PG Herveou authored 
      ## Xcm changes:
- Fix `pallet_xcm::execute`, move the logic into The `ExecuteController`
so it can be shared with anything that implement that trait.
- Make `ExecuteController::execute` retursn `DispatchErrorWithPostInfo`
instead of `DispatchError`, so that we don't charge the full
`max_weight` provided if the execution is incomplete (useful for
force_batch or contracts calls)
- Fix docstring for `pallet_xcm::execute`, to reflect the changes from
#2405
- Update the signature for `ExecuteController::execute`, we don't need
to return the `Outcome` anymore since we only care about
`Outcome::Complete`

## Contracts changes:

- Update host fn `xcm_exexute`, we don't need to write the `Outcome` to
the sandbox memory anymore. This was also not charged as well before so
it if fixes this too.
- One of the issue was that the dry_run of a contract that call
`xcm_execute` would exhaust the `gas_limit`.

This is because `XcmExecuteController::execute` takes a `max_weight`
argument, and since we don't want the user to specify it manually we
were passing everything left by pre-charghing
`ctx.ext.gas_meter().gas_left()`

- To fix it I added a `fn influence_lowest_limit` on the `Token` trait
and make it return false for `RuntimeCost::XcmExecute`.
- Got rid of the `RuntimeToken` indirection, we can just use
`RuntimeCost` directly.

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      ca382f32
    • Anton Vilhelm Ásgeirsson's avatar
      Add Coretime to Westend (#3319) · 320863a8
      Anton Vilhelm Ásgeirsson authored 
      Adds the coretime and on demand pallets to enable Coretime on Westend. 
In order for the migration to run successfully, we need the
Broker/Coretime parachain to be live.

TODO:
- [ ] Broker parachain is live
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3272



---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      320863a8
  47. Feb 16, 2024
  49. Feb 13, 2024
  51. Feb 12, 2024