Skip to content
  1. Jan 26, 2024
    • Svyatoslav Nikolsky's avatar
      Remove bridges zombienet tests from CI (#3071) · acd043bc
      Svyatoslav Nikolsky authored 
      closes https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2796

This partially reverts the #2439 - there are some changes (unrelated to
CI) that we still want to keep. The reason of that removal is that with
async backing enabled for Rococo AH (and for other chains in the near
future), we see a lot of issues there (because we run `14` nodes +
additional standalone process within a same container and it causes a
lot of timeouts). There's no way known to me to fix it right now, so
we're removing those tests hopefully temporarily to keep CI green
      acd043bc
  3. Jan 15, 2024
  5. Jan 12, 2024
    • Javier Viola's avatar
      Bump zombienet version `v1.3.91` (#2912) · c421b879
      Javier Viola authored 
      This version includes
- Performance improvements.
- Minor fixes.
      c421b879
    • Svyatoslav Nikolsky's avatar
      Run bridges zombienet tests on CI (#2439) · 5ed0a75f
      Svyatoslav Nikolsky authored 
      Brridges zombienet tests are non-standard - zombienet currently missing
multiple relay chains support (see e.g.
https://github.com/paritytech/zombienet/pull/796), so we need to go live
with two relay networks, their parachains + custom test runner (which
e.g. doesn't shutdown net when its tests are finished and instead waits
for both networks tests to complete). So we are stuck with native
zombienet provider => this PR is an attempt to gather everything in a
single docker container and run tests there ~Draft, because it is far
from finishing - what I want now is to see how it works on CI~
      5ed0a75f
  7. Jan 11, 2024
  9. Jan 10, 2024
    • ordian's avatar
      statement-distribution: validator disabling (#1841) · a4195326
      ordian authored 
      

Closes #1591.

The purpose of this PR is filter out backing statements from the network
signed by disabled validators. This is just an optimization, since we
will do filtering in the runtime in #1863 to avoid nodes to filter
garbage out at block production time.

- [x] Ensure it's ok to fiddle with the mask of manifests
- [x] Write more unit tests
- [x] Test locally
- [x] simple zombienet test
- [x] PRDoc

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarTsvetomir Dimitrov <[email protected]>
      a4195326
  11. Jan 08, 2024
  13. Dec 31, 2023
  15. Dec 20, 2023
    • Dónal Murray's avatar
      Fix clippy lints behind feature gates and add new CI step all features (#2569) · d68868f6
      Dónal Murray authored 
      

Many clippy lints usually enforced by `-Dcomplexity` and `-Dcorrectness`
are not caught by CI as they are gated by `features`, like
`runtime-benchmarks`, while the clippy CI job runs with only the default
features for all targets.

This PR also adds a CI step to run clippy with `--all-features` to
ensure the code quality is maintained behind feature gates from now on.

To improve local development, clippy lints are downgraded to warnings,
but they still will result in an error at CI due to the `-Dwarnings`
rustflag.

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarLiam Aharon <[email protected]>
      d68868f6
  17. Dec 19, 2023
  19. Dec 18, 2023
  21. Dec 15, 2023
  23. Dec 13, 2023
    • Squirrel's avatar
      Set clippy lints in workspace (requires rust 1.74) (#2390) · be8e6268
      Squirrel authored 
      

We currently use a bit of a hack in `.cargo/config` to make sure that
clippy isn't too annoying by specifying the list of lints.

There is now a stable way to define lints for a workspace. The only down
side is that every crate seems to have to opt into this so there's a
*few* files modified in this PR.

Dependencies:

- [x] PR that upgrades CI to use rust 1.74 is merged.

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarjoe petrowski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarLiam Aharon <[email protected]>
      be8e6268
    • Alexandru Gheorghe's avatar
      Approve multiple candidates with a single signature (#1191) · a84dd0db
      Alexandru Gheorghe authored 
      Initial implementation for the plan discussed here: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/701
Built on top of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1178
v0: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7554,

## Overall idea

When approval-voting checks a candidate and is ready to advertise the
approval, defer it in a per-relay chain block until we either have
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT candidates to sign or a candidate has stayed
MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS in the queue, in both cases we sign what
candidates we have available.

This should allow us to reduce the number of approvals messages we have
to create/send/verify. The parameters are configurable, so we should
find some values that balance:

- Security of the network: Delaying broadcasting of an approval
shouldn't but the finality at risk and to make sure that never happens
we won't delay sending a vote if we are past 2/3 from the no-show time.
- Scalability of the network: MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT = 1 &
MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS =0, is what we have now and we know from
the measurements we did on versi, it bottlenecks
approval-distribution/approval-voting when increase significantly the
number of validators and parachains
- Block storage: In case of disputes we have to import this votes on
chain and that increase the necessary storage with
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT * CandidateHash per vote. Given that
disputes are not the normal way of the network functioning and we will
limit MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT in the single digits numbers, this
should be good enough. Alternatively, we could try to create a better
way to store this on-chain through indirection, if that's needed.

## Other fixes:
- Fixed the fact that we were sending random assignments to
non-validators, that was wrong because those won't do anything with it
and they won't gossip it either because they do not have a grid topology
set, so we would waste the random assignments.
- Added metrics to be able to debug potential no-shows and
mis-processing of approvals/assignments.

## TODO:
- [x] Get feedback, that this is moving in the right direction. @ordian
@sandreim @eskimor @burdges, let me know what you think.
- [x] More and more testing.
- [x]  Test in versi.
- [x] Make MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT &
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_WAIT_MILLIS a parachain host configuration.
- [x] Make sure the backwards compatibility works correctly
- [x] Make sure this direction is compatible with other streams of work:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/635 &
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/742


- [x] Final versi burn-in before merging

---------

Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
      a84dd0db
  25. Dec 12, 2023
  27. Dec 06, 2023
  29. Dec 05, 2023
  31. Dec 01, 2023
  33. Nov 30, 2023
  35. Nov 29, 2023
  37. Nov 28, 2023
  39. Nov 27, 2023
    • Maciej's avatar
      Zombienet tests - disputes on finalized blocks (#2184) · dc69dbba
      Maciej authored 
      

**Overview:**
Adding an extra malus variant focusing on disputing finalized blocks. It
will:
- wrap around approval-voting
- listen to `OverseerSignal::BlockFinalized` and when encountered start
a dispute for the `dispute_offset`th ancestor
- simply pass through all other messages and signals

Add zombienet tests testing various edgecases:
- disputing freshly finalized blocks
- disputing stale finalized blocks
- disputing eagerly pruned finalized blocks (might be separate PR)

**TODO:**
- [x] Register new malus variant
- [x] Simple pass through wrapper (approval-voting)
- [x] Simple network definition
- [x] Listen to block finalizations
- [x] Fetch ancestor hash
- [x] Fetch session index
- [x] Fetch candidate
- [x] Construct and send dispute message
- [x] zndsl test 1 checking that disputes on fresh finalizations resolve
valid Closes #1365
- [x] zndsl test 2 checking that disputes for too old finalized blocks
are not possible Closes #1364
- [ ] zndsl test 3 checking that disputes for candidates with eagerly
pruned relay parent state are handled correctly #1359 (deferred to a
separate PR)
- [x] Unit tests for new malus variant (testing cli etc)
- [x] Clean/streamline error handling
- [ ] ~~Ensure it tests properly on session boundaries~~

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarJavier Viola <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarMarcin S. <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarTsvetomir Dimitrov <[email protected]>
      dc69dbba
  41. Nov 25, 2023
  43. Nov 24, 2023
  45. Nov 23, 2023
  47. Nov 22, 2023
  49. Nov 21, 2023
  51. Nov 17, 2023
  53. Nov 16, 2023
  55. Nov 15, 2023