Westend SP dmp queue pallet removal is complete.

<img width="1499" alt="Screenshot 2023-11-28 at 08 31 27"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/16665596/906246fb-3de9-4133-a827-431636a097ad">

<img width="1499" alt="Screenshot 2023-11-28 at 08 32 08"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/16665596/bde84891-b044-42c7-9a0b-59125cd24db1">

<img width="1499" alt="Screenshot 2023-11-28 at 08 31 45"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/16665596/38337484-0856-45c0-b9ff-8c785bc3c0e3">

Remove deprecated `AllPalletsXY` types.

They have been deprecated for nearly 1.5 years now, I think its fine to
remove them.
If anyone feels like we should first put a date on the deprecation as
stated in the deprecation guideline, feel free to speak up. To me it
looks like this has been forgotten and can be directly removed.

Currently gitspiegel trigger won't run if there is merge conflict. This
PR fixes it.

close https://github.com/paritytech/gitspiegel/issues/183

This commit introduces a new concept called `NotificationService` which
allows Polkadot protocols to communicate with the underlying
notification protocol implementation directly, without routing events
through `NetworkWorker`. This implies that each protocol has its own
service which it uses to communicate with remote peers and that each
`NotificationService` is unique with respect to the underlying
notification protocol, meaning `NotificationService` for the transaction
protocol can only be used to send and receive transaction-related
notifications.

The `NotificationService` concept introduces two additional benefits:
  * allow protocols to start using custom handshakes
  * allow protocols to accept/reject inbound peers

Previously the validation of inbound connections was solely the
responsibility of `ProtocolController`. This caused issues with light
peers and `SyncingEngine` as `ProtocolController` would accept more
peers than `SyncingEngine` could accept which caused peers to have
differing views of their own states. `SyncingEngine` would reject excess
peers but these rejections were not properly communicated to those peers
causing them to assume that they were accepted.

With `NotificationService`, the local handshake is not sent to remote
peer if peer is rejected which allows it to detect that it was rejected.

This commit also deprecates the use of `NetworkEventStream` for all
notification-related events and going forward only DHT events are
provided through `NetworkEventStream`. If protocols wish to follow each
other's events, they must introduce additional abtractions, as is done
for GRANDPA and transactions protocols by following the syncing protocol
through `SyncEventStream`.

Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/512
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/514
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/515
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/554
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/556

---
These changes are transferred from
https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/14197

 but there are no
functional changes compared to that PR

---------

Co-authored-by: Dmitry Markin <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alexandru Vasile <[email protected]>

The test was a bit flaky on CI. 

There was a race condition in the pov-recovery system. If the timing is
bad, it can happen that a block waits for a parent that is already
queued for import. The check if a block has children waiting happens
when we insert into the import queue. So we need to do an additional
check once we receive the import notification for the parent block.

Second issue is that `alice` was missing `--in-peers 0` and `--out-peers
0`, so alice was sometimes still fetching block via sync and the
assertion on the logs in zombienet would fail.

There is another potential issue that I saw once locally. We have a
failing pov-recovery queue that fails from time to time to check that
the retry mechanism does what it should. We now make sure that the same
candidate is never failed twice, so the tests become more predictable.

This was never used and we probably don't need it anyway.

Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Vladimir Istyufeev <[email protected]>

Followup of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2217

This PR deletes the README of the `wasm-builder` crate and moves its
docs back into the rustdoc, [as requested
here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2217#discussion_r1406401175).
(:

Step in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/171



This PR adds `derive_impl` on all `frame_system` config impls for mock
runtimes. The overridden configs are maintained as of now to ensure
minimal changes.

---------

Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>

Sets `frame_system::LastRuntimeUpgrade` after running try-runtime
migrations to better emulate real behavior.

This fixes an issue where migrations using the spec version to determine
whether to execute can incorrectly fail idempotency checks.

@s0me0ne-unkn0wn noticed this issue with the session key migration
introduced in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2265.

Currently the polkadot node will backoff from block authoring if
finality starts lagging. This PR disables this mechanism on production
networks (polkadot and kusama) and adds a flags to optionally force
enabling it.

We're going to bridge Polkadot Bridge Hub with [Polkadot Bulletin
chain](https://github.com/zdave-parity/polkadot-bulletin-chain) soon
(and Rococo Bridge Hub with 1:1 copy of Polkadot Bulletin chain even
sooner), so we need a variant for that chain in `NetworkId`. As
suggested, I'm adding a new variant for it to the `NetworkId` (we may
have used `ByGenesis(_)`, but decision was made to have a dedicated
variant for that).

Addresses #409.

This request has been raised by multiple community members - the ability
for the nomination pool root role to configure permissionless commission
claiming:

> Would it be possible to have a claim_commission_other extrinsic for
claiming commission of nomination pools permissionless?

This PR does not quite introduce this additional call, but amends
`do_claim_commission` to check a new `claim_permission` field in the
`Commission` struct, configured by an enum:

```
enum CommissionClaimPermission {
   Permissionless,
   Account(AccountId),
}
```
This can be optionally set in a bonded pool's
`commission.claim_permission` field:

```
struct BondedPool {
   commission: {
      <snip>
      claim_permission: Option<CommissionClaimPermission<T::AccountId>>,
   },
   <snip>
}
```

This is a new field and requires a migration to add it to existing
pools. This will be `None` on pool creation, falling back to the `root`
role having sole access to claim commission if it is not set; this is
the behaviour as it is today. Once set, the field _can_ be set to `None`
again.

#### Changes
- [x] Add `commision.claim_permission` field.
- [x] Add `can_claim_commission` and amend `do_claim_commission`.
- [x] Add `set_commission_claim_permission` call.
- [x] Test to cover new configs and call.
- [x] Add and amend benchmarks.
- [x] Generate new weights + slot into call
`set_commission_claim_permission`.
- [x] Add migration to introduce `commission.claim_permission`, bump
storage version.
- [x] Update Westend weights.
- [x] Migration working.

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

README instructions fixes to be compatible with the `polkadot-prepare`
and `polkadot-execute` binary split.

Incorporate suggestion from release team to get this workflow working.

edit: worked on this test GH release:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/releases/tag/liam-debug-ghw.
let's try it.

The `chill_other` call is the only staking call that explicitly requires
`controller` in its signature. This PR changes the controller arg to be
the stash instead, with `StakingLedger` then fetching the controller
from storage.

This is not a breaking change per se - the call types do not change, but
is noteworthy as UIs will now want to pass the stash account into
`chill_other` calls, & metadata will reflect this.

Note: This is very low impact. `chill_other` has [hardly ever been
used](https://polkadot.subscan.io/extrinsic?address=&module=staking&call=chill_other&result=all&signedChecked=signed%20only&startDate=&endDate=&startBlock=&timeType=date&version=9431&endBlock=

)
on Polkadot - notwithstanding the one called 11 days ago at block
18177457 that was a part of test I did, the last call was made 493 days
ago. Only 2 calls have ever been successful.

Addresses controller deprecation #2500

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <[email protected]>

Just adds more tests.

Our executor currently only supports the WASM MVP feature set, however
nowadays when compiling WASM the Rust compiler has more features enabled
by default.

We do set the `-C target-cpu=mvp` flag to make sure that *our* code gets
compiled in a way that is compatible with our executor, however this
doesn't affect Rust's standard library crates (`std`, `core` and
`alloc`) which are by default precompiled and still can make use of
these extra features.

So in this PR we force the compiler to also compile the standard library
crates for us to make sure that they also only use the MVP features.

I've added the `WASM_BUILD_STD` environment variable which can be used
to disable this behavior if set to `0`.

Unfortunately this *will* slow down the compile times when building
runtimes, but there isn't much that we can do about that.

Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1755



---------

Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>

This PR decomissions
[`PR-Custom-Review`](https://github.com/paritytech/pr-custom-review) in
replacement for
[`Review-bot`](https://github.com/paritytech/review-bot).

**Overview:**
Adding an extra malus variant focusing on disputing finalized blocks. It
will:
- wrap around approval-voting
- listen to `OverseerSignal::BlockFinalized` and when encountered start
a dispute for the `dispute_offset`th ancestor
- simply pass through all other messages and signals

Add zombienet tests testing various edgecases:
- disputing freshly finalized blocks
- disputing stale finalized blocks
- disputing eagerly pruned finalized blocks (might be separate PR)

**TODO:**
- [x] Register new malus variant
- [x] Simple pass through wrapper (approval-voting)
- [x] Simple network definition
- [x] Listen to block finalizations
- [x] Fetch ancestor hash
- [x] Fetch session index
- [x] Fetch candidate
- [x] Construct and send dispute message
- [x] zndsl test 1 checking that disputes on fresh finalizations resolve
valid Closes #1365
- [x] zndsl test 2 checking that disputes for too old finalized blocks
are not possible Closes #1364
- [ ] zndsl test 3 checking that disputes for candidates with eagerly
pruned relay parent state are handled correctly #1359 (deferred to a
separate PR)
- [x] Unit tests for new malus variant (testing cli etc)
- [x] Clean/streamline error handling
- [ ] ~~Ensure it tests properly on session boundaries~~

---------

Co-authored-by: Javier Viola <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Marcin S. <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Tsvetomir Dimitrov <[email protected]>

## Overview

This PR aligns the `spec_version` formatting to the [recent
changes](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/26/files#diff-efa4caeb17487ecb13d8f5eb7863c3241d84afa2e73fbf25909a2ca89df0f362R142

)
made for the Polkadot/Kusama runtimes.

It also backports the latest version `v1.4.0` bumps as `1_004_000`.

## Details

During the switch from `v0.9` to `v1.x`, the format of the
`spec_version` was modified from: `(M)m_ppp` for a runtime considered on
version `M.m.pp`. For instance `0.9.42` had a `spec_version` of `9420`.

With the transition to `v1.x`, the format was changed to a bigger number
(still `u32`) formatted as `MM_mm_ppp` where `1.2.3` would be stored as
`01_02_003`.

This PR aligns the format with that has been introduced in the
fellowship repo: `MMM_mmm_ppp`.

---------

Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>

# Description

Documentation for the TxPause and SafeMode pallets.

Based on reading and the notes from the following related PRs:
- https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/12092



I believe this also completes the checklist to be able to close the
related PRs:
- Close #302 
- Close #274

---------

Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]>

This PR removes some `ChainSpec` types which are not necessary
(left-overs from #1256). Currently `ChainSpec` does not have to be
generic over the specific `RuntimeGenesisConfig`, it is enough to use
single type for all:

https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/9f787018857660440182142adc806954d7d07709/cumulus/polkadot-parachain/src/chain_spec/mod.rs#L53-L54


related to: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/25

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

Add `build-push-image-polkadot-debug` job to needs since we changed to
use the polkadot-debug image from the current branch for cumulus test
and we need to be sure that the image is ready. Fix issues like
https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/4481059

cc: @bkchr



Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>

Otherwise the user may runs into weird errors if there is already a db.

Include fix for `0002-parachains-upgrade-smoke-test` test.

The following members have been added:

```pre
cumulus/parachains/integration-tests/emulated/chains/parachains/testing/penpal
cumulus/parachains/testnets-common
polkadot/node/tracking-allocator
substrate/frame/examples/frame-crate
```

CI check can be added after
https://github.com/paritytech/pipeline-scripts/pull/105

 is merged.

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>

The last issue blocking the removal of the Polkadot and Kusama system
parachains from the repo in #1737 is the dependency on the runtime code
through the RuntimeApi in `polkadot-parachain`.

This PR introduces two fake runtimes to satisfy the build requirements
and changes the `new_partial` function to make it not be generic over
the runtimes.
The reason for the second runtime is the different Aura keys used in
Polkadot Asset Hub, as the impl for AuraApi depends on this type.
If this changes the `RuntimeApi` generic could be removed completely
from all functions in `services.rs` and and generic type parameters in
`services.rs` and specified as a concrete type to TFullClient`.

---------

Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>

The FastUnstake pallet tests were previously directly modifying storage
items in the pallet-staking to alter exposure. However, due to the
introduction of the [new paged exposure
feature](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1189) these
tests were not testing against correct storage items. This issue
resulted in a bug that I didn't catch, which has been addressed in [this
fix](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2369).

This PR introduces a modification to how the pallet-fast-unstake handles
exposure. It now utilizes `pallet-staking::EraInfo` to set or mutate
Exposures.

Use non-zero weight limit in benchmarking `pallet_xcm::execute()` so the
given XCM actually executes.

# Description

Needed this in my code as part of the larger data structure.

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

Printing the `unpin_worker_sender` included the entire stacktrace and
that is a little bit too verbose.

After #2001 the `fork_choice` strategy may remain uninitialized in the
block import pipeline which uses relay-chain verifier.
Refer to
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2430#issuecomment-1823979813
for some further discussion.

DMP queue migration is complete and the pallet should be removed to fix
the check runtime upgrade CI.

<img width="1501" alt="Screenshot 2023-11-24 at 16 05 37"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/16665596/ee1da6bb-2756-4423-8085-1e4c73553ad5">

<img width="1501" alt="Screenshot 2023-11-24 at 16 06 44"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/16665596/03f3e88f-aed8-4eaa-aab6-7998f72258be">

I noticed that this test broke at some point. The parachain nodes should
only acquire their blocks from the relay chain. But they were connecting
to their peers and started fetching blocks from there.

In this test I now take additional measures so we check that each nodes
really uses pov-recovery to get the blocks.

closes #2194 

cc @mrcnski



---------

Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>