- Apr 23, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
Ensure outbound XCMs are decodable with limits + add `EnsureDecodableXcm` router (for testing purposes) (#4186) This PR: - adds `EnsureDecodableXcm` (testing) router that attempts to *encode* and *decode* passed XCM `message` to ensure that the receiving side will be able to decode, at least with the same XCM version. - fixes `pallet_xcm` / `pallet_xcm_benchmarks` assets data generation Relates to investigation of https://substrate.stackexchange.com/questions/11288 and missing fix https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2129 which did not get into the fellows 1.1.X release. ## Questions/TODOs - [x] fix XCM benchmarks, which produces undecodable data - new router catched at least two cases - `BoundedVec exceeds its limit` - `Fungible asset of zero amount is not allowed` - [x] do we need to add `sort` to the `prepend_with` as we did for reanchor [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2129)? @serban300 (**created separate/follow-up PR**: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/4235) - [x] We added decoding check to `XcmpQueue` -> `validate_xcm_nesting`, why not to added to the `ParentAsUmp` or `ChildParachainRouter`? @franciscoaguirre (**created separate/follow-up PR**: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/4236) - [ ] `SendController::send_blob` replace `VersionedXcm::<()>::decode(` with `VersionedXcm::<()>::decode_with_depth_limit(MAX_XCM_DECODE_DEPTH, data)` ? --------- Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
-
- Apr 22, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
This PR: - sanitizes all `UniversalLocation`s with `GlobalConsensus` (when possible) - addressing [comment](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/4025#discussion_r1557361473) - adds `DefaultConfig` for `pallet-xcm-benchmarks` for `system`
-
- Apr 16, 2024
-
-
Muharem Ismailov authored
Introduce types to define 1:1 balance conversion for different relative asset ids/locations of native asset. Examples: native asset on Asset Hub presented as `VersionedLocatableAsset` type in the context of Relay Chain is ``` { `location`: (0, Parachain(1000)), `asset_id`: (1, Here), } ``` and it's balance should be converted 1:1 by implementations of `ConversionToAssetBalance` trait. --------- Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>
-
- Apr 12, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
This PR mainly removes `xcm::v3` stuff from `assets-common` to make it more generic and facilitate the transition to newer XCM versions. Some of the implementations here used hard-coded `xcm::v3::Location`, but now it's up to the runtime to configure according to its needs. Additional/consequent changes: - `penpal` runtime uses now `xcm::latest::Location` for `pallet_assets` as `AssetId`, because we don't care about migrations here - it pretty much simplify xcm-emulator integration tests, where we don't need now a lots of boilerplate conversions: ``` v3::Location::try_from(...).expect("conversion works")` ``` - xcm-emulator tests - split macro `impl_assets_helpers_for_parachain` to the `impl_assets_helpers_for_parachain` and `impl_foreign_assets_helpers_for_parachain` (avoids using hard-coded `xcm::v3::Location`)
-
- Apr 04, 2024
-
-
Liam Aharon authored
Part of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/226 Related https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1833 - Deprecate `CurrencyAdapter` and introduce `FungibleAdapter` - Deprecate `ToStakingPot` and replace usage with `ResolveTo` - Required creating a new `StakingPotAccountId` struct that implements `TypedGet` for the staking pot account ID - Update parachain common utils `DealWithFees`, `ToAuthor` and `AssetsToBlockAuthor` implementations to use `fungible` - Update runtime XCM Weight Traders to use `ResolveTo` instead of `ToStakingPot` - Update runtime Transaction Payment pallets to use `FungibleAdapter` instead of `CurrencyAdapter` - [x] Blocked by https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1296, needs the `Unbalanced::decrease_balance` fix
-
- Apr 03, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
Added tests for XCM barriers: `AllowSubscriptions`, `WithUniqueTopic` and `TrailingSetTopicAsId` (#3955) Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1756
-
- Apr 02, 2024
-
-
Serban Iorga authored
Working towards migrating the `parity-bridges-common` repo inside `polkadot-sdk`. This PR upgrades some dependencies in order to align them with the versions used in `parity-bridges-common` Related to https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2538
-
- Mar 27, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
`execute` and `send` try to decode the xcm in the parameters before reaching the filter line. The new extrinsics decode only after the filter line. These should be used instead of the old ones. ## TODO - [x] Tests - [x] Generate weights - [x] Deprecation issue -> https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3771 - [x] PRDoc - [x] Handle error in pallet-contracts This would make writing XCMs in PJS Apps more difficult, but here's the fix for that: https://github.com/polkadot-js/apps/pull/10350. Already deployed! https://polkadot.js.org/apps/#/utilities/xcm Supersedes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1798/ --------- Co-authored-by: PG Herveou <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
-
- Mar 26, 2024
-
-
Dcompoze authored
**Update:** Pushed additional changes based on the review comments. **This pull request fixes various spelling mistakes in this repository.** Most of the changes are contained in the first **3** commits: - `Fix spelling mistakes in comments and docs` - `Fix spelling mistakes in test names` - `Fix spelling mistakes in error messages, panic messages, logs and tracing` Other source code spelling mistakes are separated into individual commits for easier reviewing: - `Fix the spelling of 'authority'` - `Fix the spelling of 'REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY'` - `Fix the spelling of 'prev_enqueud_messages'` - `Fix the spelling of 'endpoint'` - `Fix the spelling of 'children'` - `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSiblingSovereignAccount'` - `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSudoAccount'` - `Fix the spelling of 'insufficient'` - `Fix the spelling of 'PalletXcmExtrinsicsBenchmark'` - `Fix the spelling of 'subtracted'` - `Fix the spelling of 'CandidatePendingAvailability'` - `Fix the spelling of 'exclusive'` - `Fix the spelling of 'until'` - `Fix the spelling of 'discriminator'` - `Fix the spelling of 'nonexistent'` - `Fix the spelling of 'subsystem'` - `Fix the spelling of 'indices'` - `Fix the spelling of 'committed'` - `Fix the spelling of 'topology'` - `Fix the spelling of 'response'` - `Fix the spelling of 'beneficiary'` - `Fix the spelling of 'formatted'` - `Fix the spelling of 'UNKNOWN_PROOF_REQUEST'` - `Fix the spelling of 'succeeded'` - `Fix the spelling of 'reopened'` - `Fix the spelling of 'proposer'` - `Fix the spelling of 'InstantiationNonce'` - `Fix the spelling of 'depositor'` - `Fix the spelling of 'expiration'` - `Fix the spelling of 'phantom'` - `Fix the spelling of 'AggregatedKeyValue'` - `Fix the spelling of 'randomness'` - `Fix the spelling of 'defendant'` - `Fix the spelling of 'AquaticMammal'` - `Fix the spelling of 'transactions'` - `Fix the spelling of 'PassingTracingSubscriber'` - `Fix the spelling of 'TxSignaturePayload'` - `Fix the spelling of 'versioning'` - `Fix the spelling of 'descendant'` - `Fix the spelling of 'overridden'` - `Fix the spelling of 'network'` Let me know if this structure is adequate. **Note:** The usage of the words `Merkle`, `Merkelize`, `Merklization`, `Merkelization`, `Merkleization`, is somewhat inconsistent but I left it as it is. ~~**Note:** In some places the term `Receival` is used to refer to message reception, IMO `Reception` is the correct word here, but I left it as it is.~~ ~~**Note:** In some places the term `Overlayed` is used instead of the more acceptable version `Overlaid` but I also left it as it is.~~ ~~**Note:** In some places the term `Applyable` is used instead of the correct version `Applicable` but I also left it as it is.~~ **Note:** Some usage of British vs American english e.g. `judgement` vs `judgment`, `initialise` vs `initialize`, `optimise` vs `optimize` etc. are both present in different places, but I suppose that's understandable given the number of contributors. ~~**Note:** There is a spelling mistake in `.github/CODEOWNERS` but it triggers errors in CI when I make changes to it, so I left it as it is.~~
-
- Mar 22, 2024
-
-
PG Herveou authored
We do not need to make these traits generic over QueryId type, we can just use the QueryId alias everywhere
-
- Mar 19, 2024
-
-
Juan Ignacio Rios authored
Currently the xcm-executor returns an `Unimplemented` error if it receives any HRMP-related instruction. What I propose here, which is what we are currently doing in our forked executor at polimec, is to introduce a trait implemented by the executor which will handle those instructions. This way, if parachains want to keep the default behavior, they just use `()` and it will return unimplemented, but they can also implement their own logic to establish HRMP channels with other chains in an automated fashion, without requiring to go through governance. Our implementation is mentioned in the [polkadot HRMP docs](https://arc.net/l/quote/hduiivbu), and it was suggested to us to submit a PR to add these changes to polkadot-sdk. --------- Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Mar 15, 2024
-
-
gupnik authored
Step in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/171 This PR removes `as [disambiguation_path]` syntax from `derive_impl` usage across the polkadot-sdk as introduced in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3505
-
- Mar 13, 2024
-
-
georgepisaltu authored
Revert "FRAME: Create `TransactionExtension` as a replacement for `SignedExtension` (#2280)" (#3665) This PR reverts #2280 which introduced `TransactionExtension` to replace `SignedExtension`. As a result of the discussion [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3623#issuecomment-1986789700), the changes will be reverted for now with plans to reintroduce the concept in the future. --------- Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]>
-
- Mar 04, 2024
-
-
Gavin Wood authored
Closes #2160 First part of [Extrinsic Horizon](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2415) Introduces a new trait `TransactionExtension` to replace `SignedExtension`. Introduce the idea of transactions which obey the runtime's extensions and have according Extension data (né Extra data) yet do not have hard-coded signatures. Deprecate the terminology of "Unsigned" when used for transactions/extrinsics owing to there now being "proper" unsigned transactions which obey the extension framework and "old-style" unsigned which do not. Instead we have __*General*__ for the former and __*Bare*__ for the latter. (Ultimately, the latter will be phased out as a type of transaction, and Bare will only be used for Inherents.) Types of extrinsic are now therefore: - Bare (no hardcoded signature, no Extra data; used to be known as "Unsigned") - Bare transactions (deprecated): Gossiped, validated with `ValidateUnsigned` (deprecated) and the `_bare_compat` bits of `TransactionExtension` (deprecated). - Inherents: Not gossiped, validated with `ProvideInherent`. - Extended (Extra data): Gossiped, validated via `TransactionExtension`. - Signed transactions (with a hardcoded signature). - General transactions (without a hardcoded signature). `TransactionExtension` differs from `SignedExtension` because: - A signature on the underlying transaction may validly not be present. - It may alter the origin during validation. - `pre_dispatch` is renamed to `prepare` and need not contain the checks present in `validate`. - `validate` and `prepare` is passed an `Origin` rather than a `AccountId`. - `validate` may pass arbitrary information into `prepare` via a new user-specifiable type `Val`. - `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to `Implicit`/`implicit`. It is encoded *for the entire transaction* and passed in to each extension as a new argument to `validate`. This facilitates the ability of extensions to acts as underlying crypto. There is a new `DispatchTransaction` trait which contains only default function impls and is impl'ed for any `TransactionExtension` impler. It provides several utility functions which reduce some of the tedium from using `TransactionExtension` (indeed, none of its regular functions should now need to be called directly). Three transaction version discriminator ("versions") are now permissible: - 0b000000100: Bare (used to be called "Unsigned"): contains Signature or Extra (extension data). After bare transactions are no longer supported, this will strictly identify an Inherents only. - 0b100000100: Old-school "Signed" Transaction: contains Signature and Extra (extension data). - 0b010000100: New-school "General" Transaction: contains Extra (extension data), but no Signature. For the New-school General Transaction, it becomes trivial for authors to publish extensions to the mechanism for authorizing an Origin, e.g. through new kinds of key-signing schemes, ZK proofs, pallet state, mutations over pre-authenticated origins or any combination of the above. ## Code Migration ### NOW: Getting it to build Wrap your `SignedExtension`s in `AsTransactionExtension`. This should be accompanied by renaming your aggregate type in line with the new terminology. E.g. Before: ```rust /// The SignedExtension to the basic transaction logic. pub type SignedExtra = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension, ); /// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime. pub type UncheckedExtrinsic = generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, SignedExtra>; ``` After: ```rust /// The extension to the basic transaction logic. pub type TxExtension = ( /* snip */ AsTransactionExtension<MySpecialSignedExtension>, ); /// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime. pub type UncheckedExtrinsic = generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, TxExtension>; ``` You'll also need to alter any transaction building logic to add a `.into()` to make the conversion happen. E.g. Before: ```rust fn construct_extrinsic( /* snip */ ) -> UncheckedExtrinsic { let extra: SignedExtra = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */), ); let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), extra.clone()).unwrap(); let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e)); UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed( /* snip */ Signature::Sr25519(signature), extra, ) } ``` After: ```rust fn construct_extrinsic( /* snip */ ) -> UncheckedExtrinsic { let tx_ext: TxExtension = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */).into(), ); let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), tx_ext.clone()).unwrap(); let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e)); UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed( /* snip */ Signature::Sr25519(signature), tx_ext, ) } ``` ### SOON: Migrating to `TransactionExtension` Most `SignedExtension`s can be trivially converted to become a `TransactionExtension`. There are a few things to know. - Instead of a single trait like `SignedExtension`, you should now implement two traits individually: `TransactionExtensionBase` and `TransactionExtension`. - Weights are now a thing and must be provided via the new function `fn weight`. #### `TransactionExtensionBase` This trait takes care of anything which is not dependent on types specific to your runtime, most notably `Call`. - `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to `Implicit`/`implicit`. - Weight must be returned by implementing the `weight` function. If your extension is associated with a pallet, you'll probably want to do this via the pallet's existing benchmarking infrastructure. #### `TransactionExtension` Generally: - `pre_dispatch` is now `prepare` and you *should not reexecute the `validate` functionality in there*! - You don't get an account ID any more; you get an origin instead. If you need to presume an account ID, then you can use the trait function `AsSystemOriginSigner::as_system_origin_signer`. - You get an additional ticket, similar to `Pre`, called `Val`. This defines data which is passed from `validate` into `prepare`. This is important since you should not be duplicating logic from `validate` to `prepare`, you need a way of passing your working from the former into the latter. This is it. - This trait takes two type parameters: `Call` and `Context`. `Call` is the runtime call type which used to be an associated type; you can just move it to become a type parameter for your trait impl. `Context` is not currently used and you can safely implement over it as an unbounded type. - There's no `AccountId` associated type any more. Just remove it. Regarding `validate`: - You get three new parameters in `validate`; all can be ignored when migrating from `SignedExtension`. - `validate` returns a tuple on success; the second item in the tuple is the new ticket type `Self::Val` which gets passed in to `prepare`. If you use any information extracted during `validate` (off-chain and on-chain, non-mutating) in `prepare` (on-chain, mutating) then you can pass it through with this. For the tuple's last item, just return the `origin` argument. Regarding `prepare`: - This is renamed from `pre_dispatch`, but there is one change: - FUNCTIONALITY TO VALIDATE THE TRANSACTION NEED NOT BE DUPLICATED FROM `validate`!! - (This is different to `SignedExtension` which was required to run the same checks in `pre_dispatch` as in `validate`.) Regarding `post_dispatch`: - Since there are no unsigned transactions handled by `TransactionExtension`, `Pre` is always defined, so the first parameter is `Self::Pre` rather than `Option<Self::Pre>`. If you make use of `SignedExtension::validate_unsigned` or `SignedExtension::pre_dispatch_unsigned`, then: - Just use the regular versions of these functions instead. - Have your logic execute in the case that the `origin` is `None`. - Ensure your transaction creation logic creates a General Transaction rather than a Bare Transaction; this means having to include all `TransactionExtension`s' data. - `ValidateUnsigned` can still be used (for now) if you need to be able to construct transactions which contain none of the extension data, however these will be phased out in stage 2 of the Transactions Horizon, so you should consider moving to an extension-centric design. ## TODO - [x] Introduce `CheckSignature` impl of `TransactionExtension` to ensure it's possible to have crypto be done wholly in a `TransactionExtension`. - [x] Deprecate `SignedExtension` and move all uses in codebase to `TransactionExtension`. - [x] `ChargeTransactionPayment` - [x] `DummyExtension` - [x] `ChargeAssetTxPayment` (asset-tx-payment) - [x] `ChargeAssetTxPayment` (asset-conversion-tx-payment) - [x] `CheckWeight` - [x] `CheckTxVersion` - [x] `CheckSpecVersion` - [x] `CheckNonce` - [x] `CheckNonZeroSender` - [x] `CheckMortality` - [x] `CheckGenesis` - [x] `CheckOnlySudoAccount` - [x] `WatchDummy` - [x] `PrevalidateAttests` - [x] `GenericSignedExtension` - [x] `SignedExtension` (chain-polkadot-bulletin) - [x] `RefundSignedExtensionAdapter` - [x] Implement `fn weight` across the board. - [ ] Go through all pre-existing extensions which assume an account signer and explicitly handle the possibility of another kind of origin. - [x] `CheckNonce` should probably succeed in the case of a non-account origin. - [x] `CheckNonZeroSender` should succeed in the case of a non-account origin. - [x] `ChargeTransactionPayment` and family should fail in the case of a non-account origin. - [ ] - [x] Fix any broken tests. --------- Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Vasile <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Nikhil Gupta <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Chevdor <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Maciej <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Javier Viola <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Marcin S. <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tsvetomir Dimitrov <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Javier Bullrich <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Koute <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vladimir Istyufeev <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ross Bulat <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Svyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: André Silva <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: s0me0ne-unkn0wn <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sebastian Kunert <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Aaro Altonen <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dmitry Markin <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alexandru Vasile <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alexander Samusev <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Julian Eager <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Michal Kucharczyk <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Davide Galassi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: yjh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tom Mi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Will | Paradox | ParaNodes.io <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Joshy Orndorff <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Joshy Orndorff <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: PG Herveou <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alexander Theißen <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Juan Girini <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: bader y <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: James Wilson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: asynchronous rob <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Parth <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Andrew Jones <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jonathan Udd <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Serban Iorga <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Egor_P <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Evgeny Snitko <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Just van Stam <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: gupnik <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dzmitry-lahoda <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: zhiqiangxu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Nazar Mokrynskyi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Anwesh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: cheme <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sam Johnson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: kianenigma <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jegor Sidorenko <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Muharem <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: joepetrowski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Gabriel Facco de Arruda <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Squirrel <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Feb 26, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
## Problem During the bumping of the `polkadot-fellows` repository to `[email protected]`, I encountered a situation where the benchmarks `teleport_assets` and `reserve_transfer_assets` in AssetHubKusama started to fail. This issue arose due to a decreased ED balance for AssetHubs introduced [here](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/158/files#diff-80668ff8e793b64f36a9a3ec512df5cbca4ad448c157a5d81abda1b15f35f1daR213), and also because of a [missing CI pipeline](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/issues/197) to check the benchmarks, which went unnoticed. These benchmarks expect the `caller` to have enough: 1. balance to transfer (BTT) 2. balance for paying delivery (BFPD). So the initial balance was calculated as `ED * 100`, which seems reasonable: ``` const ED_MULTIPLIER: u32 = 100; let balance = existential_deposit.saturating_mul(ED_MULTIPLIER.into());` ``` The problem arises when the price for delivery is 100 times higher than the existential deposit. In other words, when `ED * 100` does not cover `BTT` + `BFPD`. I check AHR/AHW/AHK/AHP and this problem has only AssetHubKusama ``` ED: 3333333 calculated price to parent delivery: 1031666634 (from xcm logs from the benchmark) --- 3333333 * 100 - BTT(3333333) - BFPD(1031666634) = −701666667 ``` which results in the error; ``` 2024-02-23 09:19:42 Unable to charge fee with error Module(ModuleError { index: 31, error: [17, 0, 0, 0], message: Some("FeesNotMet") }) Error: Input("Benchmark pallet_xcm::reserve_transfer_assets failed: FeesNotMet") ``` ## Solution The benchmarks `teleport_assets` and `reserve_transfer_assets` were fixed by removing `ED * 100` and replacing it with `DeliveryHelper` logic, which calculates the (almost real) price for delivery and sets it along with the existential deposit as the initial balance for the account used in the benchmark. ## TODO - [ ] patch for 1.6 - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3466 - [ ] patch for 1.7 - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3465 - [ ] patch for 1.8 - TODO: PR --------- Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
-
- Feb 19, 2024
-
-
PG Herveou authored
## Xcm changes: - Fix `pallet_xcm::execute`, move the logic into The `ExecuteController` so it can be shared with anything that implement that trait. - Make `ExecuteController::execute` retursn `DispatchErrorWithPostInfo` instead of `DispatchError`, so that we don't charge the full `max_weight` provided if the execution is incomplete (useful for force_batch or contracts calls) - Fix docstring for `pallet_xcm::execute`, to reflect the changes from #2405 - Update the signature for `ExecuteController::execute`, we don't need to return the `Outcome` anymore since we only care about `Outcome::Complete` ## Contracts changes: - Update host fn `xcm_exexute`, we don't need to write the `Outcome` to the sandbox memory anymore. This was also not charged as well before so it if fixes this too. - One of the issue was that the dry_run of a contract that call `xcm_execute` would exhaust the `gas_limit`. This is because `XcmExecuteController::execute` takes a `max_weight` argument, and since we don't want the user to specify it manually we were passing everything left by pre-charghing `ctx.ext.gas_meter().gas_left()` - To fix it I added a `fn influence_lowest_limit` on the `Token` trait and make it return false for `RuntimeCost::XcmExecute`. - Got rid of the `RuntimeToken` indirection, we can just use `RuntimeCost` directly. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Feb 13, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
I found out during the cleanup of this deprecation message in the `polkadot-fellows` repository that we deprecated `CurrencyAdapter` without making the recommended changes. ## TODO - [ ] fix `polkadot-fellows` bump to 1.6.0 https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/159 --------- Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
-
- Feb 12, 2024
-
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
Changes (partial https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/994): - Set log to `0.4.20` everywhere - Lift `log` to the workspace Starting with a simpler one after seeing https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2065 from @jsdw . This sets the `default-features` to `false` in the root and then overwrites that in each create to its original value. This is necessary since otherwise the `default` features are additive and its impossible to disable them in the crate again once they are enabled in the workspace. I am using a tool to do this, so its mostly a test to see that it works as expected. --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 31, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
This PR addresses two issues: - It modifies `DepositAsset`'s asset filter from `All` to `AllCounted(1)` to prevent potentially charging excessive weight/fees. This adjustment avoids situations where fees could be calculated based on the count of assets, as illustrated [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/cumulus/parachains/runtimes/bridge-hubs/bridge-hub-rococo/src/weights/xcm/mod.rs#L38-L46). - It encapsulates `DepositAsset` with `SetAppendix` to ensure that `fees` are not trapped in any case. For instance, this prevents issues when `ExportXcm::validate` encounters an error during the processing of `ExportMessage`.
-
Branislav Kontur authored
[frame] `#[pallet::composite_enum]` improved variant count handling + removed `pallet_balances`'s `MaxHolds` config (#2657) I started this investigation/issue based on @liamaharon question [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1801#discussion_r1410452499). ## Problem The `pallet_balances` integrity test should correctly detect that the runtime has correct distinct `HoldReasons` variant count. I assume the same situation exists for RuntimeFreezeReason. It is not a critical problem, if we set `MaxHolds` with a sufficiently large value, everything should be ok. However, in this case, the integrity_test check becomes less useful. **Situation for "any" runtime:** - `HoldReason` enums from different pallets: ```rust /// from pallet_nis #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason { NftReceipt, } /// from pallet_preimage #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason { Preimage, } // from pallet_state-trie-migration #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason { SlashForContinueMigrate, SlashForMigrateCustomTop, SlashForMigrateCustomChild, } ``` - generated `RuntimeHoldReason` enum looks like: ```rust pub enum RuntimeHoldReason { #[codec(index = 32u8)] Preimage(pallet_preimage::HoldReason), #[codec(index = 38u8)] Nis(pallet_nis::HoldReason), #[codec(index = 42u8)] StateTrieMigration(pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason), } ``` - composite enum `RuntimeHoldReason` variant count is detected as `3` - we set `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>` - `pallet_balances::integrity_test` is ok with `3`(at least 3) However, the real problem can occur in a live runtime where some functionality might stop working. This is due to a total of 5 distinct hold reasons (for pallets with multi-instance support, it is even more), and not all of them can be used because of an incorrect `MaxHolds`, which is deemed acceptable according to the `integrity_test`: ``` // pseudo-code - if we try to call all of these: T::Currency::hold(&pallet_nis::HoldReason::NftReceipt.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; T::Currency::hold(&pallet_preimage::HoldReason::Preimage.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForContinueMigrate.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; // With `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>` these two will fail T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomTop.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomChild.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; ``` ## Solutions A macro `#[pallet::*]` expansion is extended of `VariantCount` implementation for the `#[pallet::composite_enum]` enum type. This expansion generates the `VariantCount` implementation for pallets' `HoldReason`, `FreezeReason`, `LockId`, and `SlashReason`. Enum variants must be plain enum values without fields to ensure a deterministic count. The composite runtime enum, `RuntimeHoldReason` and `RuntimeFreezeReason`, now sets `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT` as the sum of pallets' enum `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT`: ```rust #[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)] mod module_single_instance { #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason { ModuleSingleInstanceReason1, ModuleSingleInstanceReason2, } ... } #[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)] mod module_multi_instance { #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason<I: 'static = ()> { ModuleMultiInstanceReason1, ModuleMultiInstanceReason2, ModuleMultiInstanceReason3, } ... } impl self::sp_api_hidden_includes_construct_runtime::hidden_include::traits::VariantCount for RuntimeHoldReason { const VARIANT_COUNT: u32 = 0 + module_single_instance::HoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance1>::VARIANT_COUNT + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance2>::VARIANT_COUNT + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance3>::VARIANT_COUNT; } ``` In addition, `MaxHolds` is removed (as suggested [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2657#discussion_r1443324573)) from `pallet_balances`, and its `Holds` are now bounded to `RuntimeHoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT`. Therefore, there is no need to let the runtime specify `MaxHolds`. ## For reviewers Relevant changes can be found here: - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/lib.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/parse/composite.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/expand/composite.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/composite_helper.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/hold_reason.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/freeze_reason.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/src/traits/misc.rs` And the rest of the files is just about removed `MaxHolds` from `pallet_balances` ## Next steps Do the same for `MaxFreezes` https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2997. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: gupnik <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 26, 2024
-
-
Liam Aharon authored
Related https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3032 --- Using https://github.com/liamaharon/cargo-workspace-version-tools/ `cargo run -- sync --path ../polkadot-sdk` --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
-
Sergej Sakac authored
This PR introduces a new `NonFungibleAdapter`. It will be useful for enabling cross-chain Coretime region transfers, as the existing `NonFungiblesAdapter` is unsuitable for this purpose. This is due to the fact that there is only one class of items within the `pallet-broker`, i.e., the Coretime regions. --------- Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 24, 2024
-
-
Just van Stam authored
Moved from: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6951 closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/490 - [x] update cumulus --- This PR introduces transactional processing of certain xcm instructions. For the list of instructions checkout https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/490. The transactional processing is implemented as an xcm-executor config item. The two implementations in this PR are `FrameTransactionalProcessor` and `()`. The `()` implementation does no transactional processing. Each implementation of the `ProcessTransaction` trait has an `IS_TRANSACTIONAL` const that tells the XCVM if transactional processing is actually implemented. If Transactional processing is implemented, changes to touched registers should also be rolled back to prevent inconsistencies. Note for reviewers: Check out the following safety assumption: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1222/files#diff-4effad7d8c1c9de19fd27e18661cbf2128c8718f3b2420a27d2f816e0749ea53R30 --------- Co-authored-by: Keith Yeung <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Jan 23, 2024
-
-
Niklas Adolfsson authored
This is a rather big change in jsonrpsee, the major things in this bump are: - Server backpressure (the subscription impls are modified to deal with that) - Allow custom error types / return types (remove jsonrpsee::core::Error and jsonrpee::core::CallError) - Bug fixes (graceful shutdown in particular not used by substrate anyway) - Less dependencies for the clients in particular - Return type requires Clone in method call responses - Moved to tokio channels - Async subscription API (not used in this PR) Major changes in this PR: - The subscriptions are now bounded and if subscription can't keep up with the server it is dropped - CLI: add parameter to configure the jsonrpc server bounded message buffer (default is 64) - Add our own subscription helper to deal with the unbounded streams in substrate The most important things in this PR to review is the added helpers functions in `substrate/client/rpc/src/utils.rs` and the rest is pretty much chore. Regarding the "bounded buffer limit" it may cause the server to handle the JSON-RPC calls slower than before. The message size limit is bounded by "--rpc-response-size" thus "by default 10MB * 64 = 640MB" but the subscription message size is not covered by this limit and could be capped as well. Hopefully the last release prior to 1.0, sorry in advance for a big PR Previous attempt: https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/13992 Resolves https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/748, resolves https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/627
-
- Jan 22, 2024
-
-
joe petrowski authored
Clean up all the old syntax. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: gupnik <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Nikhil Gupta <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Maksym H <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 18, 2024
-
-
Tsvetomir Dimitrov authored
Backport of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1863 to master Extend candidate sanitation in paras_inherent by removing backing votes from disabled validators. Check https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1592 for more details. This change is related to the disabling strategy implementation (https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2226). --------- Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Maciej <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 16, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
# Note for reviewer Most changes are just syntax changes necessary for the new version. Most important files should be the ones under the `xcm` folder. # Description Added XCMv4. ## Removed `Multi` prefix The following types have been renamed: - MultiLocation -> Location - MultiAsset -> Asset - MultiAssets -> Assets - InteriorMultiLocation -> InteriorLocation - MultiAssetFilter -> AssetFilter - VersionedMultiAsset -> VersionedAsset - WildMultiAsset -> WildAsset - VersionedMultiLocation -> VersionedLocation In order to fix a name conflict, the `Assets` in `xcm-executor` were renamed to `HoldingAssets`, as they represent assets in holding. ## Removed `Abstract` asset id It was not being used anywhere and this simplifies the code. Now assets are just constructed as follows: ```rust let asset: Asset = (AssetId(Location::new(1, Here)), 100u128).into(); ``` No need for specifying `Concrete` anymore. ## Outcome is now a named fields struct Instead of ```rust pub enum Outcome { Complete(Weight), Incomplete(Weight, Error), Error(Error), } ``` we now have ```rust pub enum Outcome { Complete { used: Weight }, Incomplete { used: Weight, error: Error }, Error { error: Error }, } ``` ## Added Reanchorable trait Now both locations and assets implement this trait, making it easier to reanchor both. ## New syntax for building locations and junctions Now junctions are built using the following methods: ```rust let location = Location { parents: 1, interior: [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)].into() }; ``` or ```rust let location = Location::new(1, [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)]); ``` And they are matched like so: ```rust match location.unpack() { (1, [Parachain(id)]) => ... (0, Here) => ..., (1, [_]) => ..., } ``` This syntax is mandatory in v4, and has been also implemented for v2 and v3 for easier migration. This was needed to make all sizes smaller. # TODO - [x] Scaffold v4 - [x] Port github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7236 - [x] Remove `Multi` prefix - [x] Remove `Abstract` asset id --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Keith Yeung <[email protected]>
-
- Dec 26, 2023
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
Adds more logging to the XCM execution for better debugging.
-
- Dec 18, 2023
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
This PR contains just a few clippy fixes and nits, which are, however, relaxed by workspace clippy settings here: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/Cargo.toml#L483-L506 --------- Co-authored-by: Dmitry Sinyavin <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
- Dec 14, 2023
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
In the move from the old `Currency` traits to the new `fungible/s` family of traits, we already had the `FungiblesAdapter` and `NonFungiblesAdapter` for multiple fungible and non fungible assets respectively. However, for handling only one fungible asset, we were missing a `FungibleAdapter`, and so used the old `CurrencyAdapter` instead. This PR aims to fill in that gap, and provide the new adapter for more updated examples. I marked the old `CurrencyAdapter` as deprecated as part of this PR, and I'll change it to the new `FungibleAdapter` in a following PR. The two stages are separated so as to not bloat this PR with some name fixes in tests. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Dec 13, 2023
-
-
Squirrel authored
We currently use a bit of a hack in `.cargo/config` to make sure that clippy isn't too annoying by specifying the list of lints. There is now a stable way to define lints for a workspace. The only down side is that every crate seems to have to opt into this so there's a *few* files modified in this PR. Dependencies: - [x] PR that upgrades CI to use rust 1.74 is merged. --------- Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]>
-
- Dec 12, 2023
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
## Summary This pull request proposes a solution for improved control of the versioned XCM flow over the bridge (across different consensus chains) and resolves the situation where the sending chain/consensus has already migrated to a higher XCM version than the receiving chain/consensus. ## Problem/Motivation The current flow over the bridge involves a transfer from AssetHubRococo (AHR) to BridgeHubRococo (BHR) to BridgeHubWestend (BHW) and finally to AssetHubWestend (AHW), beginning with a reserve-backed transfer on AHR. In this process: 1. AHR sends XCM `ExportMessage` through `XcmpQueue`, incorporating XCM version checks using the `WrapVersion` feature, influenced by `pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion` (managed by `pallet_xcm::force_xcm_version` or version discovery). 2. BHR handles the `ExportMessage` instruction, utilizing the latest XCM version. The `HaulBlobExporter` converts the inner XCM to [`VersionedXcm::from`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/63ac2471/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/universal_exports.rs#L465-L467), also using the latest XCM version. However, challenges arise: - Incompatibility when BHW uses a different version than BHR. For instance, if BHR migrates to **XCMv4** while BHW remains on **XCMv3**, BHR's `VersionedXcm::from` uses `VersionedXcm::V4` variant, causing encoding issues for BHW. ``` /// Just a simulation of possible error, which could happen on BHW /// (this code is based on actual master without XCMv4) let encoded = hex_literal::hex!("0400"); println!("{:?}", VersionedXcm::<()>::decode(&mut &encoded[..])); Err(Error { cause: None, desc: "Could not decode `VersionedXcm`, variant doesn't exist" }) ``` - Similar compatibility issues exist between AHR and AHW. ## Solution This pull request introduces the following solutions: 1. **New trait `CheckVersion`** - added to the `xcm` module and exposing `pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion`. This enhancement allows checking the actual XCM version for desired destinations outside of the `pallet_xcm` module. 2. **Version Check in `HaulBlobExporter`** uses `CheckVersion` to check known/configured destination versions, ensuring compatibility. For example, in the scenario mentioned, BHR can store the version `3` for BHW. If BHR is on XCMv4, it will attempt to downgrade the message to version `3` instead of using the latest version `4`. 3. **Version Check in `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router`** - this check ensures compatibility with the real destination's XCM version, preventing the unnecessary sending of messages to the local bridge hub if versions are incompatible. These additions aim to improve the control and compatibility of XCM flows over the bridge and addressing issues related to version mismatches. ## Possible alternative solution _(More investigation is needed, and at the very least, it should extend to XCMv4/5. If this proves to be a viable option, I can open an RFC for XCM.)._ Add the `XcmVersion` attribute to the `ExportMessage` so that the sending chain can determine, based on what is stored in `pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion`, the version the destination is using. This way, we may not need to handle the version in `HaulBlobExporter`. ``` ExportMessage { network: NetworkId, destination: InteriorMultiLocation, xcm: Xcm<()> destination_xcm_version: Version, // <- new attritbute }, ``` ``` pub trait ExportXcm { fn validate( network: NetworkId, channel: u32, universal_source: &mut Option<InteriorMultiLocation>, destination: &mut Option<InteriorMultiLocation>, message: &mut Option<Xcm<()>>, destination_xcm_version: Version, , // <- new attritbute ) -> SendResult<Self::Ticket>; ``` ## Future Directions This PR does not fix version discovery over bridge, further investigation will be conducted here: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2417. ## TODO - [x] `pallet_xcm` mock for tests uses hard-coded XCM version `2` - change to 3 or lastest? - [x] fix `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router` - [x] fix HaulBlobExporter with version determination [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/2183669d/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/universal_exports.rs#L465) - [x] add unit-tests to the runtimes - [x] run benchmarks for `ExportMessage` - [x] extend local run scripts about `force_xcm_version(dest, version)` - [ ] when merged, prepare governance calls for Rococo/Westend - [ ] add PRDoc Part of: https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2719 --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Dec 01, 2023
-
-
Liam Aharon authored
Using taplo, fixes all our broken and inconsistent toml formatting and adds CI to keep them tidy. If people want we can customise the format rules as described here https://taplo.tamasfe.dev/configuration/formatter-options.html @ggwpez , I suggest zepter is used only for checking features are propagated, and leave formatting for taplo to avoid duplicate work and conflicts. TODO - [x] Use `exclude = [...]` syntax in taplo file to ignore zombienet tests instead of deleting the dir --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 28, 2023
-
-
gupnik authored
Step in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/171 This PR adds `derive_impl` on all `frame_system` config impls for mock runtimes. The overridden configs are maintained as of now to ensure minimal changes. --------- Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 15, 2023
-
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
Refunding surplus happens anyway on xcm_executor::post_process(), automatically refunding surplus to original_origin at the end of execution. Since SovereignPaidRemoteExporter doesn't ClearOrigin, it can simply rely on the automatic mechanism. Furthermore, RefundSurplus instruction refunds _surplus_. Surplus exists only as a result of Transact, SetErrorHandler or SetAppendix instructions, none of which being part of the SovereignPaidRemoteExporter XCM program. So surplus is always zero here anyway.
-
- Nov 14, 2023
-
-
PG Herveou authored
This PR introduces: - XCM host functions `xcm_send`, `xcm_execute` - An Xcm trait into the config. that proxy these functions to to `pallet_xcm`, or disable their usage by using `()`. - A mock_network and xcm_test files to test the newly added xcm-related functions. --------- Co-authored-by: Keith Yeung <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sasha Gryaznov <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alexander Theißen <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 13, 2023
-
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
## Motivation `pallet-xcm` is the main user-facing interface for XCM functionality, including assets manipulation functions like `teleportAssets()` and `reserve_transfer_assets()` calls. While `teleportAsset()` works both ways, `reserve_transfer_assets()` works only for sending reserve-based assets to a remote destination and beneficiary when the reserve is the _local chain_. ## Solution This PR enhances `pallet_xcm::(limited_)reserve_withdraw_assets` to support transfers when reserves are other chains. This will allow complete, **bi-directional** reserve-based asset transfers user stories using `pallet-xcm`. Enables following scenarios: - transferring assets with local reserve (was previously supported iff asset used as fee also had local reserve - now it works in all cases), - transferring assets with reserve on destination, - transferring assets with reserve on remote/third-party chain (iff assets and fees have same remote reserve), - transferring assets with reserve different than the reserve of the asset to be used as fees - meaning can be used to transfer random asset with local/dest reserve while using DOT for fees on all involved chains, even if DOT local/dest reserve doesn't match asset reserve, - transferring assets with any type of local/dest reserve while using fees which can be teleported between involved chains. All of the above is done by pallet inner logic without the user having to specify which scenario/reserves/teleports/etc. The correct scenario and corresponding XCM programs are identified, and respectively, built automatically based on runtime configuration of trusted teleporters and trusted reserves. #### Current limitations: - while `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CAN have different reserves (or fees CAN be teleported), the remaining "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT, among themselves, have different reserve locations (this is also implicitly enforced by `MAX_ASSETS_FOR_TRANSFER=2`, but this can be safely increased in the future). - `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT have **different remote** reserves (this could also be supported in the future, but adds even more complexity while possibly not being worth it - we'll see what the future holds). Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1584 Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2055 --------- Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 10, 2023
-
-
PG Herveou authored
We are introducing a new set of `XcmController` traits (final name yet to be determined). These traits are implemented by `pallet-xcm` and allows other pallets, such as `pallet_contracts`, to rely on these traits instead of tight coupling them to `pallet-xcm`. Using only the existing Xcm traits would mean duplicating the logic from `pallet-xcm` in these other pallets, which we aim to avoid. Our objective is to ensure that when these APIs are called from `pallet-contracts`, they produce the exact same outcomes as if called directly from `pallet-xcm`. The other benefits is that we can also expose return values to `pallet-contracts` instead of just calling `pallet-xcm` dispatchable and getting a `DispatchResult` back. See traits integration in this PR https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1248, where the traits are used as follow to define and implement `pallet-contracts` Config. ```rs // Contracts config: pub trait Config: frame_system::Config { // ... /// A type that exposes XCM APIs, allowing contracts to interact with other parachains, and /// execute XCM programs. type Xcm: xcm_executor::traits::Controller< OriginFor<Self>, <Self as frame_system::Config>::RuntimeCall, BlockNumberFor<Self>, >; } // implementation impl pallet_contracts::Config for Runtime { // ... type Xcm = pallet_xcm::Pallet<Self>; } ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Alexander Theißen <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Nov 09, 2023
-
-
Keith Yeung authored
This was discovered during a debugging session, and it only served to mask the underlying error, which was not great.
-
- Nov 02, 2023
-
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
(imported from https://github.com/paritytech/cumulus/pull/2157) ## Changes This MR refactores the XCMP, Parachains System and DMP pallets to use the [MessageQueue](https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/12485) for delayed execution of incoming messages. The DMP pallet is entirely replaced by the MQ and thereby removed. This allows for PoV-bounded execution and resolves a number of issues that stem from the current work-around. All System Parachains adopt this change. The most important changes are in `primitives/core/src/lib.rs`, `parachains/common/src/process_xcm_message.rs`, `pallets/parachain-system/src/lib.rs`, `pallets/xcmp-queue/src/lib.rs` and the runtime configs. ### DMP Queue Pallet The pallet got removed and its logic refactored into parachain-system. Overweight message management can be done directly through the MQ pallet. Final undeployment migrations are provided by `cumulus_pallet_dmp_queue::UndeployDmpQueue` and `DeleteDmpQueue` that can be configured with an aux config trait like: ```rust parameter_types! { pub const DmpQueuePalletName: &'static str = \"DmpQueue\" < CHANGE ME; pub const RelayOrigin: AggregateMessageOrigin = AggregateMessageOrigin::Parent; } impl cumulus_pallet_dmp_queue::MigrationConfig for Runtime { type PalletName = DmpQueuePalletName; type DmpHandler = frame_support::traits::EnqueueWithOrigin<MessageQueue, RelayOrigin>; type DbWeight = <Runtime as frame_system::Config>::DbWeight; } // And adding them to your Migrations tuple: pub type Migrations = ( ... cumulus_pallet_dmp_queue::UndeployDmpQueue<Runtime>, cumulus_pallet_dmp_queue::DeleteDmpQueue<Runtime>, ); ``` ### XCMP Queue pallet Removed all dispatch queue functionality. Incoming XCMP messages are now either: Immediately handled if they are Signals, enqueued into the MQ pallet otherwise. New config items for the XCMP queue pallet: ```rust /// The actual queue implementation that retains the messages for later processing. type XcmpQueue: EnqueueMessage<ParaId>; /// How a XCM over HRMP from a sibling parachain should be processed. type XcmpProcessor: ProcessMessage<Origin = ParaId>; /// The maximal number of suspended XCMP channels at the same time. #[pallet::constant] type MaxInboundSuspended: Get<u32>; ``` How to configure those: ```rust // Use the MessageQueue pallet to store messages for later processing. The `TransformOrigin` is needed since // the MQ pallet itself operators on `AggregateMessageOrigin` but we want to enqueue `ParaId`s. type XcmpQueue = TransformOrigin<MessageQueue, AggregateMessageOrigin, ParaId, ParaIdToSibling>; // Process XCMP messages from siblings. This is type-safe to only accept `ParaId`s. They will be dispatched // with origin `Junction::Sibling(…)`. type XcmpProcessor = ProcessFromSibling< ProcessXcmMessage< AggregateMessageOrigin, xcm_executor::XcmExecutor<xcm_config::XcmConfig>, RuntimeCall, >, >; // Not really important what to choose here. Just something larger than the maximal number of channels. type MaxInboundSuspended = sp_core::ConstU32<1_000>; ``` The `InboundXcmpStatus` storage item was replaced by `InboundXcmpSuspended` since it now only tracks inbound queue suspension and no message indices anymore. Now only sends the most recent channel `Signals`, as all prio ones are out-dated anyway. ### Parachain System pallet For `DMP` messages instead of forwarding them to the `DMP` pallet, it now pushes them to the configured `DmpQueue`. The message processing which was triggered in `set_validation_data` is now being done by the MQ pallet `on_initialize`. XCMP messages are still handed off to the `XcmpMessageHandler` (XCMP-Queue pallet) - no change here. New config items for the parachain system pallet: ```rust /// Queues inbound downward messages for delayed processing. /// /// Analogous to the `XcmpQueue` of the XCMP queue pallet. type DmpQueue: EnqueueMessage<AggregateMessageOrigin>; ``` How to configure: ```rust /// Use the MQ pallet to store DMP messages for delayed processing. type DmpQueue = MessageQueue; ``` ## Message Flow The flow of messages on the parachain side. Messages come in from the left via the `Validation Data` and finally end up at the `Xcm Executor` on the right. ![Untitled (1)](https://github.com/paritytech/cumulus/assets/10380170/6cf8b377-88c9-4aed-96df-baace266e04d) ## Further changes - Bumped the default suspension, drop and resume thresholds in `QueueConfigData::default()`. - `XcmpQueue::{suspend_xcm_execution, resume_xcm_execution}` errors when they would be a noop. - Properly validate the `QueueConfigData` before setting it. - Marked weight files as auto-generated so they wont auto-expand in the MR files view. - Move the `hypothetical` asserts to `frame_support` under the name `experimental_hypothetically` Questions: - [ ] What about the ugly `#[cfg(feature = \"runtime-benchmarks\")]` in the runtimes? Not sure how to best fix. Just having them like this makes tests fail that rely on the real message processor when the feature is enabled. - [ ] Need a good weight for `MessageQueueServiceWeight`. The scheduler already takes 80% so I put it to 10% but that is quite low. TODO: - [x] Remove c&p code after https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6271 - [x] Use `HandleMessage` once it is public in Substrate - [x] fix `runtime-benchmarks` feature https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6966 - [x] Benchmarks - [x] Tests - [ ] Migrate `InboundXcmpStatus` to `InboundXcmpSuspended` - [x] Possibly cleanup Migrations (DMP+XCMP) - [x] optional: create `TransformProcessMessageOrigin` in Substrate and replace `ProcessFromSibling` - [ ] Rerun weights on ref HW --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-