Skip to content
  1. Oct 24, 2023
    • Oliver Tale-Yazdi's avatar
      Improve features dev-ex (#1831) · 4a443567
      Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored 
      Adds a config file that allows to run `zepter` without any arguments in
the workspace to address all issues.
A secondary workflow for the CI is provided as `zepter run check`. Both
the formatting and linting are now in one check for efficiancy.

The latest version also detects some more things that `featalign` was
already showing.

Error message [in the
CI](https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/3916205)
now looks like this:
```pre
...
crate 'test-parachains' (/Users/vados/Documents/work/polkadot-sdk/polkadot/parachain/test-parachains/Cargo.toml)
  feature 'std'
    must propagate to:
      parity-scale-codec
Found 55 issues (run with --fix to fix).
Error: Command 'lint propagate-feature' failed with exit code 1

Polkadot-SDK uses the Zepter CLI to detect abnormalities in the feature configuration.
It looks like one more more checks failed; please check the console output. You can try to automatically address them by running `zepter`.
Otherwise please ask directly in the Merge Request, GitHub Discussions or on Matrix Chat, thank you.

For more information, see:
  - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1831
  - https://github.com/ggwpez/zepter


```

TODO:
- [x] Check that CI fails correctly

---------

Signed-off-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      4a443567
    • Bastian Köcher's avatar
      `CheckWeight`: Add more logging (#1996) · a5a2432d
      Bastian Köcher authored 
      This adds more logging to `CheckWeight` to get a better understanding
why a transaction exhausts resources.
      a5a2432d
  3. Oct 20, 2023
  5. Oct 16, 2023
  7. Oct 15, 2023
    • Gonçalo Pestana's avatar
      Refactor staking ledger (#1484) · 8ee4042c
      Gonçalo Pestana authored 
      This PR refactors the staking ledger logic to encapsulate all reads and
mutations of `Ledger`, `Bonded`, `Payee` and stake locks within the
`StakingLedger` struct implementation.

With these changes, all the reads and mutations to the `Ledger`, `Payee`
and `Bonded` storage map should be done through the methods exposed by
StakingLedger to ensure the data and lock consistency of the operations.
The new introduced methods that mutate and read Ledger are:

- `ledger.update()`: inserts/updates a staking ledger in storage;
updates staking locks accordingly (and ledger.bond(), which is synthatic
sugar for ledger.update())
- `ledger.kill()`: removes all Bonded and StakingLedger related data for
a given ledger; updates staking locks accordingly;
`StakingLedger::get(account)`: queries both the `Bonded` and `Ledger`
storages and returns a `Option<StakingLedger>`. The pallet impl exposes
fn ledger(account) as synthatic sugar for `StakingLedger::get(account)`.

Retrieving a ledger with `StakingLedger::get()` can be done by providing
either a stash or controller account. The input must be wrapped in a
`StakingAccount` variant (Stash or Controller) which is treated
accordingly. This simplifies the caller API but will eventually be
deprecated once we completely get rid of the controller account in
staking. However, this refactor will help with the work necessary when
completely removing the controller.

Other goals:

- No logical changes have been introduced in this PR;
- No breaking changes or updates in wallets required;
- No new storage items or need to perform storage migrations;
- Centralise the changes to bonds and ledger updates to simplify the
OnStakingUpdate updates to the target list (related to
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/443)

Note: it would be great to prevent or at least raise a warning if
`Ledger<T>`, `Payee<T>` and `Bonded<T>` storage types are accessed
outside the `StakingLedger` implementation. This PR should not get
blocked by that feature, but there's a tracking issue here
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/149

Related and step towards
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/443
      8ee4042c
    • drskalman's avatar
      Paired-key Crypto Scheme (#1705) · 1b34571c
      drskalman authored 
      

BEEFY needs two cryptographic keys at the same time. Validators should
sign BEEFY payload using both ECDSA and BLS key. The network will gossip
a payload which contains a valid ECDSA key. The prover nodes aggregate
the BLS keys if aggregation fails to verifies the validator which
provided a valid ECDSA signature but an invalid BLS signature is subject
to slashing.

As such BEEFY session should be initiated with both key. Currently there
is no straight forward way of doing so, beside having a session with
RuntimeApp corresponding to a crypto scheme contains both keys.

This pull request implement a generic paired_crypto scheme as well as
implementing it for (ECDSA, BLS) pair.

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarDavide Galassi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarRobert Hambrock <[email protected]>
      1b34571c
  9. Oct 11, 2023
  11. Oct 09, 2023
    • David Emett's avatar
      Mixnet integration (#1346) · a808a3a0
      David Emett authored 
      See #1345, <https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/14207

>.

This adds all the necessary mixnet components, and puts them together in
the "kitchen-sink" node/runtime. The components added are:

- A pallet (`frame/mixnet`). This is responsible for determining the
current mixnet session and phase, and the mixnodes to use in each
session. It provides a function that validators can call to register a
mixnode for the next session. The logic of this pallet is very similar
to that of the `im-online` pallet.
- A service (`client/mixnet`). This implements the core mixnet logic,
building on the `mixnet` crate. The service communicates with other
nodes using notifications sent over the "mixnet" protocol.
- An RPC interface. This currently only supports sending transactions
over the mixnet.

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarDavid Emett <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarJavier Viola <[email protected]>
      a808a3a0
  13. Oct 07, 2023
    • Muharem Ismailov's avatar
      Treasury spends various asset kinds (#1333) · cb944dc5
      Muharem Ismailov authored 
      

### Summary 

This PR introduces new dispatchables to the treasury pallet, allowing
spends of various asset types. The enhanced features of the treasury
pallet, in conjunction with the asset-rate pallet, are set up and
enabled for Westend and Rococo.

### Westend and Rococo runtimes.

Polkadot/Kusams/Rococo Treasury can accept proposals for `spends` of
various asset kinds by specifying the asset's location and ID.

#### Treasury Instance New Dispatchables:
- `spend(AssetKind, AssetBalance, Beneficiary, Option<ValidFrom>)` -
propose and approve a spend;
- `payout(SpendIndex)` - payout an approved spend or retry a failed
payout
- `check_payment(SpendIndex)` - check the status of a payout;
- `void_spend(SpendIndex)` - void previously approved spend;
> existing spend dispatchable renamed to spend_local

in this context, the `AssetKind` parameter contains the asset's location
and it's corresponding `asset_id`, for example:
`USDT` on `AssetHub`,
``` rust
location = MultiLocation(0, X1(Parachain(1000)))
asset_id = MultiLocation(0, X2(PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)))
```

the `Beneficiary` parameter is a `MultiLocation` in the context of the
asset's location, for example
``` rust
// the Fellowship salary pallet's location / account
FellowshipSalaryPallet = MultiLocation(1, X2(Parachain(1001), PalletInstance(64)))
// or custom `AccountId`
Alice = MultiLocation(0, AccountId32(network: None, id: [1,...]))
```

the `AssetBalance` represents the amount of the `AssetKind` to be
transferred to the `Beneficiary`. For permission checks, the asset
amount is converted to the native amount and compared against the
maximum spendable amount determined by the commanding spend origin.

the `spend` dispatchable allows for batching spends with different
`ValidFrom` arguments, enabling milestone-based spending. If the
expectations tied to an approved spend are not met, it is possible to
void the spend later using the `void_spend` dispatchable.

Asset Rate Pallet provides the conversion rate from the `AssetKind` to
the native balance.

#### Asset Rate Instance Dispatchables:
- `create(AssetKind, Rate)` - initialize a conversion rate to the native
balance for the given asset
- `update(AssetKind, Rate)` - update the conversion rate to the native
balance for the given asset
- `remove(AssetKind)` - remove an existing conversion rate to the native
balance for the given asset

the pallet's dispatchables can be executed by the Root or Treasurer
origins.

### Treasury Pallet

Treasury Pallet can accept proposals for `spends` of various asset kinds
and pay them out through the implementation of the `Pay` trait.

New Dispatchables:
- `spend(Config::AssetKind, AssetBalance, Config::Beneficiary,
Option<ValidFrom>)` - propose and approve a spend;
- `payout(SpendIndex)` - payout an approved spend or retry a failed
payout;
- `check_payment(SpendIndex)` - check the status of a payout;
- `void_spend(SpendIndex)` - void previously approved spend;
> existing spend dispatchable renamed to spend_local

The parameters' types of the `spend` dispatchable exposed via the
pallet's `Config` and allows to propose and accept a spend of a certain
amount.

An approved spend can be claimed via the `payout` within the
`Config::SpendPeriod`. Clients provide an implementation of the `Pay`
trait which can pay an asset of the `AssetKind` to the `Beneficiary` in
`AssetBalance` units.

The implementation of the Pay trait might not have an immediate final
payment status, for example if implemented over `XCM` and the actual
transfer happens on a remote chain.

The `check_status` dispatchable can be executed to update the spend's
payment state and retry the `payout` if the payment has failed.

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarjoe petrowski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      cb944dc5
  15. Oct 06, 2023
  17. Oct 05, 2023
  19. Oct 01, 2023
  21. Sep 29, 2023
  23. Sep 25, 2023
  25. Sep 20, 2023
  27. Sep 18, 2023
  29. Sep 15, 2023
  31. Sep 13, 2023
  33. Sep 11, 2023
  35. Sep 08, 2023
  37. Sep 05, 2023
  39. Sep 04, 2023
  41. Sep 01, 2023
  43. Aug 31, 2023