- Nov 16, 2023
-
-
ordian authored
cc @joepetrowski
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
Westend now successfully updated to `spec: 103000`, we **have to remove** the session keys migration before the next release as it doesn't gracefully handle reapplying it.
-
- Nov 15, 2023
-
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
Refunding surplus happens anyway on xcm_executor::post_process(), automatically refunding surplus to original_origin at the end of execution. Since SovereignPaidRemoteExporter doesn't ClearOrigin, it can simply rely on the automatic mechanism. Furthermore, RefundSurplus instruction refunds _surplus_. Surplus exists only as a result of Transact, SetErrorHandler or SetAppendix instructions, none of which being part of the SovereignPaidRemoteExporter XCM program. So surplus is always zero here anyway.
-
joe petrowski authored
The goal of this PR is to migrate Identity deposits from the Relay Chain to a system parachain. The problem I want to solve is that `IdentityOf` and `SubsOf` both store an amount that's held in reserve as a storage deposit. When migrating to a parachain, we can take a snapshot of the actual `IdentityInfo` and sub-account mappings, but should migrate (off chain) the `deposit`s to zero, since the chain (and by extension, accounts) won't have any funds at genesis. The good news is that we expect parachain deposits to be significantly lower (possibly 100x) on the parachain. That is, a deposit of 21 DOT on the Relay Chain would need 0.21 DOT on a parachain. This PR proposes to migrate the deposits in the following way: 1. Introduces a new pallet with two extrinsics: - `reap_identity`: Has a configurable `ReapOrigin`, which would be set to `EnsureSigned` on the Relay Chain (i.e. callable by anyone) and `EnsureRoot` on the parachain (we don't want identities reaped from there). - `poke_deposit`: Checks what deposit the pallet holds (at genesis, zero) and attempts to update the amount based on the calculated deposit for storage data. 2. `reap_identity` clears all storage data for a `target` account and unreserves their deposit. 3. A `ReapIdentityHandler` teleports the necessary DOT to the parachain and calls `poke_deposit`. Since the parachain deposit is much lower, and was just unreserved, we know we have enough. One awkwardness I ran into was that the XCMv3 instruction set does not provide a way for the system to teleport assets without a fee being deducted on reception. Users shouldn't have to pay a fee for the system to migrate their info to a more efficient location. So I wrote my own program and did the `InitiateTeleport` accounting on my own to send a program with `UnpaidExecution`. Have discussed an `InitiateUnpaidTeleport` instruction with @franciscoaguirre . Obviously any chain executing this would have to pass a `Barrier` for free execution. TODO: - [x] Confirm People Chain ParaId - [x] Confirm People Chain deposit rates (determined in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2281) - [x] Add pallet to Westend --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
Disallow reserve transfers that use teleportable fees if `(origin, fees)` matches `XcmTeleportFilter`. Add regression tests for filtering based on `XcmTeleportFilter` for both `(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets()` and `(limited_)teleport_assets` extrinsics.
-
- Nov 14, 2023
-
-
PG Herveou authored
This PR introduces: - XCM host functions `xcm_send`, `xcm_execute` - An Xcm trait into the config. that proxy these functions to to `pallet_xcm`, or disable their usage by using `()`. - A mock_network and xcm_test files to test the newly added xcm-related functions. --------- Co-authored-by: Keith Yeung <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sasha Gryaznov <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alexander Theißen <[email protected]>
-
Alin Dima authored
Adds a `NodeFeatures` bitfield value to the runtime `HostConfiguration`, with the purpose of coordinating the enabling of node-side features, such as: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/628 and https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/598. These are features that require all validators enable them at the same time, assuming all/most nodes have upgraded their node versions. This PR doesn't add any feature yet. These are coming in future PRs. Also adds a runtime API for querying the state of the client features and an extrinsic for setting/unsetting a feature by its index in the bitfield. Note: originally part of: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1644, but posted as standalone to be reused by other PRs until the initial PR is merged
-
Kristian Sosnin authored
Fixes #1437 Co-authored-by: Sophia Gold <[email protected]>
-
jserrat authored
Co-authored-by: Marcin S <[email protected]>
-
Marcin S. authored
-
Branislav Kontur authored
## Problem/Motivation The benchmark for the `ExpectPallet` XCM instruction uses a hard-coded version `4.0.0` for the `frame_system` pallet. Unfortunately, this doesn't work for the `polkadot-fellows/runtimes` repository, where we use dependencies from `crates.io`, e.g., [frame-system::23.0.0.0](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/blob/dd7f86f0d50064481ed0b7c0218494a5cfad997e/relay/kusama/Cargo.toml#L83). Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2284 ## Solution This PR fixes the benchmarks that require pallet information and enables the runtime to provide the correct/custom pallet information. The default implementation provides `frame_system::Pallet` with index `0`, where the version is not hard-coded but read from the runtime. ## Local testing Added log for `T::valid_pallet` to the benchmarks like: ``` let valid_pallet = T::valid_pallet(); log::info!( target: "frame::benchmark::pallet", "valid_pallet: {}::{}::{}::{}::{}", valid_pallet.index, valid_pallet.module_name, valid_pallet.crate_version.major, valid_pallet.crate_version.minor, valid_pallet.crate_version.patch, ); ``` Run benchmarks for `westend`: ``` cargo run --bin=polkadot --features=runtime-benchmarks -- benchmark pallet --steps=2 --repeat=1 --extrinsic=* --heap-pages=4096 --json-file=./bench.json --chain=westend-dev --template=./polkadot/xcm/pallet-xcm-benchmarks/template.hbs --pallet=pallet_xcm_benchmarks::generic --output=./polkadot/runtime/westend/src/weights/xcm ``` --- For actual `frame_system` version: ``` [package] name = "frame-system" version = "4.0.0-dev" ``` Log dump: ``` 2023-11-13 12:56:45 Starting benchmark: pallet_xcm_benchmarks::generic::query_pallet 2023-11-13 12:56:45 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::4::0::0 2023-11-13 12:56:45 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::4::0::0 2023-11-13 12:56:45 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::4::0::0 2023-11-13 12:56:45 Starting benchmark: pallet_xcm_benchmarks::generic::expect_pallet 2023-11-13 12:56:45 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::4::0::0 2023-11-13 12:56:45 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::4::0::0 2023-11-13 12:56:45 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::4::0::0 ``` For changed `frame_system` version: ``` [package] name = "frame-system" version = "5.1.3-dev" ``` Log dump: ``` 2023-11-13 12:51:51 Starting benchmark: pallet_xcm_benchmarks::generic::query_pallet 2023-11-13 12:51:51 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::5::1::3 2023-11-13 12:51:51 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::5::1::3 2023-11-13 12:51:51 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::5::1::3 2023-11-13 12:51:51 Starting benchmark: pallet_xcm_benchmarks::generic::expect_pallet 2023-11-13 12:51:51 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::5::1::3 2023-11-13 12:51:51 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::5::1::3 2023-11-13 12:51:51 valid_pallet: 0::frame_system::5::1::3 ``` ## References Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2284
-
Alin Dima authored
Collators were previously reencoding the available data and checking the erasure root. Replace that with just checking the PoV hash, which consumes much less CPU and takes less time. We also don't need to check the `PersistedValidationData` hash, as collators don't use it. Reason: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/575#issuecomment-1806572230 After systematic chunks recovery is merged, collators will no longer do any reed-solomon encoding/decoding, which has proven to be a great CPU consumer. Signed-off-by: alindima <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 13, 2023
-
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
## Motivation `pallet-xcm` is the main user-facing interface for XCM functionality, including assets manipulation functions like `teleportAssets()` and `reserve_transfer_assets()` calls. While `teleportAsset()` works both ways, `reserve_transfer_assets()` works only for sending reserve-based assets to a remote destination and beneficiary when the reserve is the _local chain_. ## Solution This PR enhances `pallet_xcm::(limited_)reserve_withdraw_assets` to support transfers when reserves are other chains. This will allow complete, **bi-directional** reserve-based asset transfers user stories using `pallet-xcm`. Enables following scenarios: - transferring assets with local reserve (was previously supported iff asset used as fee also had local reserve - now it works in all cases), - transferring assets with reserve on destination, - transferring assets with reserve on remote/third-party chain (iff assets and fees have same remote reserve), - transferring assets with reserve different than the reserve of the asset to be used as fees - meaning can be used to transfer random asset with local/dest reserve while using DOT for fees on all involved chains, even if DOT local/dest reserve doesn't match asset reserve, - transferring assets with any type of local/dest reserve while using fees which can be teleported between involved chains. All of the above is done by pallet inner logic without the user having to specify which scenario/reserves/teleports/etc. The correct scenario and corresponding XCM programs are identified, and respectively, built automatically based on runtime configuration of trusted teleporters and trusted reserves. #### Current limitations: - while `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CAN have different reserves (or fees CAN be teleported), the remaining "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT, among themselves, have different reserve locations (this is also implicitly enforced by `MAX_ASSETS_FOR_TRANSFER=2`, but this can be safely increased in the future). - `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT have **different remote** reserves (this could also be supported in the future, but adds even more complexity while possibly not being worth it - we'll see what the future holds). Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1584 Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2055 --------- Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>
-
Bastian Köcher authored
Remove the `GRANDPA_AUTHORITIES_KEY` key and its usage. Apparently this was used in the early days to communicate the grandpa authorities to the node. However, we have now a runtime api that does this for us. So, this pull request is moving from the custom managed storage item to a FRAME managed storage item. This pr also includes a migration for doing the switch on a running chain. --------- Co-authored-by: Davide Galassi <[email protected]>
-
Marcin S. authored
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 10, 2023
-
-
PG Herveou authored
We are introducing a new set of `XcmController` traits (final name yet to be determined). These traits are implemented by `pallet-xcm` and allows other pallets, such as `pallet_contracts`, to rely on these traits instead of tight coupling them to `pallet-xcm`. Using only the existing Xcm traits would mean duplicating the logic from `pallet-xcm` in these other pallets, which we aim to avoid. Our objective is to ensure that when these APIs are called from `pallet-contracts`, they produce the exact same outcomes as if called directly from `pallet-xcm`. The other benefits is that we can also expose return values to `pallet-contracts` instead of just calling `pallet-xcm` dispatchable and getting a `DispatchResult` back. See traits integration in this PR https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1248, where the traits are used as follow to define and implement `pallet-contracts` Config. ```rs // Contracts config: pub trait Config: frame_system::Config { // ... /// A type that exposes XCM APIs, allowing contracts to interact with other parachains, and /// execute XCM programs. type Xcm: xcm_executor::traits::Controller< OriginFor<Self>, <Self as frame_system::Config>::RuntimeCall, BlockNumberFor<Self>, >; } // implementation impl pallet_contracts::Config for Runtime { // ... type Xcm = pallet_xcm::Pallet<Self>; } ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Alexander Theißen <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
Liam Aharon authored
As suggested by @ggwpez (https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2142#discussion_r1388145872), remove the `VersionChecked` prefix from version checked migrations (but leave `VersionUnchecked` prefixes) --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Nov 09, 2023
-
-
Lulu authored
The staging- rename commit was missing from the last PR for some reason.
-
Lulu authored
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
Missing descriptions (47): - [x] `cumulus/client/collator/Cargo.toml` - [x] `cumulus/client/relay-chain-inprocess-interface/Cargo.toml` - [x] `cumulus/client/cli/Cargo.toml` - [x] `cumulus/client/service/Cargo.toml` - [x] `cumulus/client/relay-chain-rpc-interface/Cargo.toml` - [x] `cumulus/client/relay-chain-interface/Cargo.toml` - [x] `cumulus/client/relay-chain-minimal-node/Cargo.toml` - [x] `cumulus/parachains/pallets/parachain-info/Cargo.toml` - [x] `cumulus/parachains/pallets/ping/Cargo.toml` - [x] `cumulus/primitives/utility/Cargo.toml` - [x] `cumulus/primitives/aura/Cargo.toml` - [x] `cumulus/primitives/core/Cargo.toml` - [x] `cumulus/primitives/parachain-inherent/Cargo.toml` - [x] `cumulus/test/relay-sproof-builder/Cargo.toml` - [x] `cumulus/pallets/xcmp-queue/Cargo.toml` - [x] `cumulus/pallets/dmp-queue/Cargo.toml` - [x] `cumulus/pallets/xcm/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/erasure-coding/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/statement-table/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/primitives/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/rpc/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/service/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/core/parachains-inherent/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/core/approval-voting/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/core/dispute-coordinator/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/core/av-store/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/core/chain-api/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/core/prospective-parachains/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/core/backing/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/core/provisioner/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/core/runtime-api/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/core/bitfield-signing/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/network/dispute-distribution/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/network/bridge/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/network/collator-protocol/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/network/approval-distribution/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/network/availability-distribution/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/network/bitfield-distribution/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/network/gossip-support/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/network/availability-recovery/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/collation-generation/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/node/overseer/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/runtime/parachains/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/runtime/common/slot_range_helper/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/runtime/metrics/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/xcm/pallet-xcm-benchmarks/Cargo.toml` - [x] `polkadot/utils/generate-bags/Cargo.toml` - [x] `substrate/bin/minimal/runtime/Cargo.toml` --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: alindima <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tsvetomir Dimitrov <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Marcin S <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: alindima <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sebastian Kunert <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dmitry Markin <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]>
-
Keith Yeung authored
This was discovered during a debugging session, and it only served to mask the underlying error, which was not great.
-
- Nov 08, 2023
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
One for local networks with `fast-runtime` feature activated (1 minute sessions) and one without the feature activated that will be the default that runs with 1 hour long sessions.
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
PalletInfo fields were private, preventing a user from actually using the QueryPallet instruction in a meaningful way since they couldn't read the received data.
-
s0me0ne-unkn0wn authored
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
Changes: - Adds a new call `remove_key` to the sudo pallet to permanently remove the sudo key. - Remove some clones and general maintenance --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
Added a proc macro to be able to write XCMs using the builder pattern. This means we go from having to do this: ```rust let message: Xcm<()> = Xcm(vec![ WithdrawAsset(assets), BuyExecution { fees: asset, weight_limit: Unlimited }, DepositAsset { assets, beneficiary }, ]); ``` to this: ```rust let message: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder() .withdraw_asset(assets) .buy_execution(asset, Unlimited), .deposit_asset(assets, beneficiary) .build(); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Keith Yeung <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Nov 07, 2023
-
-
vuittont60 authored
-
Xiliang Chen authored
Part of #2186 The only usage of pallet-asset-rate is guarded by `runtime-benchmarks` feature. I don't want ORML to be forced to include this pallet in deps for no good reason.
-
Alexandru Gheorghe authored
There was a race in merging between https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1256 and https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1178, so this newly added tests wasn't updated with the new path for the configuration, so fix that. Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 06, 2023
-
-
Alin Dima authored
availability-distribution subsystem is not sending availability-recovery messages. Update the overseer declaration to reflect this
-
Andrei Sandu authored
**_PR migrated from https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6782_** This PR will upgrade the network protocol to version 3 -> VStaging which will later be renamed to V3. This version introduces a new kind of assignment certificate that will be used for tranche0 assignments. Instead of issuing/importing one tranche0 assignment per candidate, there will be just one certificate per relay chain block per validator. However, we will not be sending out the new assignment certificates, yet. So everything should work exactly as before. Once the majority of the validators have been upgraded to the new protocol version we will enable the new certificates (starting at a specific relay chain block) with a new client update. There are still a few things that need to be done: - [x] Use bitfield instead of Vec<CandidateIndex>: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6802 - [x] Fix existing approval-distribution and approval-voting tests - [x] Fix bitfield-distribution and statement-distribution tests - [x] Fix network bridge tests - [x] Implement todos in the code - [x] Add tests to cover new code - [x] Update metrics - [x] Remove the approval distribution aggression levels: TBD PR - [x] Parachains DB migration - [x] Test network protocol upgrade on Versi - [x] Versi Load test - [x] Add Zombienet test - [x] Documentation updates - [x] Fix for sending DistributeAssignment for each candidate claimed by a v2 assignment (warning: Importing locally an already known assignment) - [x] Fix AcceptedDuplicate - [x] Fix DB migration so that we can still keep old data. - [x] Final Versi burn in --------- Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
-
Richard Melkonian authored
This PR exposes a `force_remove_vesting` through a ROOT call. See linked [issue](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/269) --------- Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]>
-
Alexandru Gheorghe authored
... see https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2138 for why is not good, until we fix it let's add a warning to understand if this is happening in the wild. --------- Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
Michal Kucharczyk authored
This PR updates the version of `serde_json` to `1.0.108` throughout the codebase.
-
- Nov 05, 2023
-
-
Michal Kucharczyk authored
This PR prepares chains specs for _native-runtime-free_ world. This PR has following changes: - `substrate`: - adds support for: - JSON based `GenesisConfig` to `ChainSpec` allowing interaction with runtime `GenesisBuilder` API. - interacting with arbitrary runtime wasm blob to[ `chain-spec-builder`](https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/blob/3ef576eaeb3f42610e85daecc464961cf1295570/bin/utils/chain-spec-builder/src/lib.rs#L46) command line util, - removes [`code`](https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/blob/3ef576eaeb3f42610e85daecc464961cf1295570/frame/system/src/lib.rs#L660) from `system_pallet` - adds `code` to the `ChainSpec` - deprecates [`ChainSpec::from_genesis`](https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/blob/3ef576eaeb3f42610e85daecc464961cf1295570/client/chain-spec/src/chain_spec.rs#L263), but also changes the signature of this method extending it with `code` argument. [`ChainSpec::builder()`](https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/blob/20bee680ed098be7239cf7a6b804cd4de267983e/client/chain-spec/src/chain_spec.rs#L507) should be used instead. - `polkadot`: - all references to `RuntimeGenesisConfig` in `node/service` are removed, - all `(kusama|polkadot|versi|rococo|wococo)_(staging|dev)_genesis_config` functions now return the JSON patch for default runtime `GenesisConfig`, - `ChainSpecBuilder` is used, `ChainSpec::from_genesis` is removed, - `cumulus`: - `ChainSpecBuilder` is used, `ChainSpec::from_genesis` is removed, - _JSON_ patch configuration used instead of `RuntimeGenesisConfig struct` in all chain specs. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Javier Viola <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Davide Galassi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Kevin Krone <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
s0me0ne-unkn0wn authored
-
Bulat Saifullin authored
# Description Update the bootnode of kusama parachains before decommissioning the nodes. This will avoid connecting to non-existing bootnodes.
-
- Nov 03, 2023
-
-
georgepisaltu authored
This PR is a follow up to #1661 - [x] rename the `simple` module to `legacy` - [x] fix benchmarks to disregard the number of additional fields - [x] change the storage deposits to charge per encoded byte of the identity information instance, removing the need for `fn additional(&self) -> usize` in `IdentityInformationProvider` - [x] ~add an extrinsic to rejig deposits to account for the change above~ - [ ] ~ensure through proper configuration that the new byte-based deposit is always lower than whatever is reserved now~ - [x] remove `IdentityFields` from the `set_fields` extrinsic signature, as per [this discussion](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1661#discussion_r1371703403) > ensure through proper configuration that the new byte-based deposit is always lower than whatever is reserved now Not sure this is needed anymore. If the new deposits are higher than what is currently on chain and users don't have enough funds to reserve what is needed, the extrinisc fails and they're basically grandfathered and frozen until they add more funds and/or make a change to their identity. This behavior seems fine to me. Original idea [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1661#issuecomment-1779606319). > add an extrinsic to rejig deposits to account for the change above This was initially implemented but now removed from this PR in favor of the implementation detailed [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2088). --------- Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: joepetrowski <[email protected]>
-
Bastian Köcher authored
The `BlockBuilderProvider` was a trait that was defined in `sc-block-builder`. The trait was implemented for `Client`. This basically meant that you needed to import `sc-block-builder` any way to have access to the block builder. So, this trait was not providing any real value. This pull request is removing the said trait. Instead of the trait it introduces a builder for creating a `BlockBuilder`. The builder currently has the quite fabulous name `BlockBuilderBuilder` (I'm open to any better name
😅 ). The rest of the pull request is about replacing the old trait with the new builder. # Downstream code changes If you used `new_block` or `new_block_at` before you now need to switch it over to the new `BlockBuilderBuilder` pattern: ```rust // `new` requires a type that implements `CallApiAt`. let mut block_builder = BlockBuilderBuilder::new(client) // Then you need to specify the hash of the parent block the block will be build on top of .on_parent_block(at) // The block builder also needs the block number of the parent block. // Here it is fetched from the given `client` using the `HeaderBackend` // However, there also exists `with_parent_block_number` for directly passing the number .fetch_parent_block_number(client) .unwrap() // Enable proof recording if required. This call is optional. .enable_proof_recording() // Pass the digests. This call is optional. .with_inherent_digests(digests) .build() .expect("Creates new block builder"); ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Sebastian Kunert <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> -
s0me0ne-unkn0wn authored
-