1. Dec 12, 2023
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      Ensure xcm versions over bridge (on sending chains) (#2481) · 575b8f8d
      Branislav Kontur authored
      ## Summary
      
      This pull request proposes a solution for improved control of the
      versioned XCM flow over the bridge (across different consensus chains)
      and resolves the situation where the sending chain/consensus has already
      migrated to a higher XCM version than the receiving chain/consensus.
      
      ## Problem/Motivation
      
      The current flow over the bridge involves a transfer from AssetHubRococo
      (AHR) to BridgeHubRococo (BHR) to BridgeHubWestend (BHW) and finally to
      AssetHubWestend (AHW), beginning with a reserve-backed transfer on AHR.
      
      In this process:
      1. AHR sends XCM `ExportMessage` through `XcmpQueue`, incorporating XCM
      version checks using the `WrapVersion` feature, influenced by
      `pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion` (managed by
      `pallet_xcm::force_xcm_version` or version discovery).
      
      2. BHR handles the `ExportMessage` instruction, utilizing the latest XCM
      version. The `HaulBlobExporter` converts the inner XCM to
      [`VersionedXcm::from`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/63ac2471aa0210f0ac9903bdd7d8f9351f9a635f/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/universal_exports.rs#L465-L467),
      also using the latest XCM version.
      
      However, challenges arise:
      - Incompatibility when BHW uses a different version than BHR. For
      instance, if BHR migrates to **XCMv4** while BHW remains on **XCMv3**,
      BHR's `VersionedXcm::from` uses `VersionedXcm::V4` variant, causing
      encoding issues for BHW.
        ```
      	/// Just a simulation of possible error, which could happen on BHW
      	/// (this code is based on actual master without XCMv4)
      	let encoded = hex_literal::hex!("0400");
      	println!("{:?}", VersionedXcm::<()>::decode(&mut &encoded[..]));
      
      Err(Error { cause: None, desc: "Could not decode `VersionedXcm`, variant
      doesn't exist" })
        ``` 
      - Similar compatibility issues exist between AHR and AHW.
      
      ## Solution
      
      This pull request introduces the following solutions:
      
      1. **New trait `CheckVersion`** - added to the `xcm` module and exposing
      `pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion`. This enhancement allows checking the
      actual XCM version for desired destinations outside of the `pallet_xcm`
      module.
      
      2. **Version Check in `HaulBlobExporter`** uses `CheckVersion` to check
      known/configured destination versions, ensuring compatibility. For
      example, in the scenario mentioned, BHR can store the version `3` for
      BHW. If BHR is on XCMv4, it will attempt to downgrade the message to
      version `3` instead of using the latest version `4`.
      
      3. **Version Check in `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router`** - this check
      ensures compatibility with the real destination's XCM version,
      preventing the unnecessary sending of messages to the local bridge hub
      if versions are incompatible.
      
      These additions aim to improve the control and compatibility of XCM
      flows over the bridge and addressing issues related to version
      mismatches.
      
      ## Possible alternative solution
      
      _(More investigation is needed, and at the very least, it should extend
      to XCMv4/5. If this proves to be a viable option, I can open an RFC for
      XCM.)._
      
      Add the `XcmVersion` attribute to the `ExportMessage` so that the
      sending chain can determine, based on what is stored in
      `pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion`, the version the destination is using.
      This way, we may not need to handle the version in `HaulBlobExporter`.
      
      ```
      ExportMessage {
      	network: NetworkId,
      	destination: InteriorMultiLocation,
      	xcm: Xcm<()>
      	destination_xcm_version: Version, // <- new attritbute
      },
      ```
      
      ```
      pub trait ExportXcm {
              fn validate(
      		network: NetworkId,
      		channel: u32,
      		universal_source: &mut Option<InteriorMultiLocation>,
      		destination: &mut Option<InteriorMultiLocation>,
      		message: &mut Option<Xcm<()>>,
                      destination_xcm_version: Version, , // <- new attritbute
      	) -> SendResult<Self::Ticket>;
      ```
      
      ## Future Directions
      
      This PR does not fix version discovery over bridge, further
      investigation will be conducted here:
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2417.
      
      ## TODO
      
      - [x] `pallet_xcm` mock for tests uses hard-coded XCM version `2` -
      change to 3 or lastest?
      - [x] fix `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router`
      - [x] fix HaulBlobExporter with version determination
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/2183669d05f9b510f979a0cc3c7847707bacba2e/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/universal_exports.rs#L465)
      - [x] add unit-tests to the runtimes
      - [x] run benchmarks for `ExportMessage`
      - [x] extend local run scripts about `force_xcm_version(dest, version)`
      - [ ] when merged, prepare governance calls for Rococo/Westend
      - [ ] add PRDoc
      
      Part of: https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2719
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      575b8f8d
    • Chevdor's avatar
      Changelogs local generation (#1411) · 42a3afba
      Chevdor authored
      
      
      This PR introduces a script and some templates to use the prdoc involved
      in a release and build:
      - the changelog
      - a simple draft of audience documentation
      
      Since the prdoc presence was enforced in the middle of the version
      1.5.0, not all PRs did come with a `prdoc` file.
      This PR creates all the missing `prdoc` files with some minimum content
      allowing to properly generate the changelog.
      The generated content is **not** suitable for the audience
      documentation.
      
      The audience documentation will be possible with the next version, when
      all PR come with a proper `prdoc`.
      
      ## Assumptions
      
      - the prdoc files for release `vX.Y.Z` have been moved under
      `prdoc/X.Y.Z`
      - the changelog requires for now for the prdoc files to contain author +
      topic. Thos fields are optional.
      
      The build script can  be called as:
      ```
      VERSION=X.Y.Z ./scripts/release/build-changelogs.sh
      ```
      
      Related:
      -  #1408
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarEgorPopelyaev <[email protected]>
      42a3afba
    • Ross Bulat's avatar
      Staking: Add `deprecate_controller_batch` AdminOrigin call (#2589) · 048a9c27
      Ross Bulat authored
      
      
      Partially Addresses #2500
      
      Adds a `deprecate_controller_batch` call to the staking pallet that is
      callable by `Root` and `StakingAdmin`. To be used for controller account
      deprecation and removed thereafter. Adds
      `MaxControllersDeprecationBatch` pallet constant that defines max
      possible deprecations per call.
      
      - [x] Add `deprecate_controller_batch` call, and
      `MaxControllersInDeprecationBatch` constant.
      - [x] Add tests, benchmark, weights. Tests that weight is only consumed
      if unique pair.
      - [x] Adds `StakingAdmin` origin to staking's `AdminOrigin` type in
      westend runtime.
      - [x] Determined that worst case 5,900 deprecations does fit into
      `maxBlock` `proofSize` and `refTime` in both normal and operational
      thresholds, meaning we can deprecate all controllers for each network in
      one call.
      
      ## Block Weights
      
      By querying `consts.system.blockWeights` we can see that the
      `deprecate_controller_batch` weights fit within the `normal` threshold
      on Polkadot.
      
      #### `controller_deprecation_batch` where i = 5900:
      #### Ref time: 69,933,325,300
      #### Proof size: 21,040,390
      
      ### Polkadot 
      
      ```
      // consts.query.blockWeights
      
      maxBlock: {
              refTime: 2,000,000,000,000
              proofSize: 18,446,744,073,709,551,615
      }
      normal: {
       maxExtrinsic: {
      	refTime: 1,479,873,955,000
      	proofSize: 13,650,590,614,545,068,195
       }
       maxTotal: {
      	refTime: 1,500,000,000,000
      	proofSize: 13,835,058,055,282,163,711
       }
      }
      ```
      
      ### Kusama
      
      ```
      // consts.query.blockWeights
      
        maxBlock: {
          refTime: 2,000,000,000,000
          proofSize: 18,446,744,073,709,551,615
        }
          normal: {
            maxExtrinsic: {
              refTime: 1,479,875,294,000
              proofSize: 13,650,590,614,545,068,195
            }
            maxTotal: {
              refTime: 1,500,000,000,000
              proofSize: 13,835,058,055,282,163,711
            }
      }
      ```
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarGonçalo Pestana <[email protected]>
      048a9c27
  2. Dec 11, 2023
  3. Dec 08, 2023
    • Bastian Köcher's avatar
      Update proc-macro-crate (#2660) · f6ae1458
      Bastian Köcher authored
      f6ae1458
    • Muharem Ismailov's avatar
      Westend: Fellowship Treasury (#2532) · da40d97a
      Muharem Ismailov authored
      
      
      Treasury Pallet Instance for the Fellowship in Westend Collectives.
      
      In this update, we present a Treasury Pallet Instance that is under the
      control of the Fellowship body, with oversight from the Root and
      Treasurer origins. Here's how it is governed:
      - the Root origin have the authority to reject or approve spend
      proposals, with no amount limit for approvals.
      - the Treasurer origin have the authority to reject or approve spend
      proposals, with approval limits of up to 10,000,000 DOT.
      - Voice of all Fellows ranked at 3 or above can reject or approve spend
      proposals, with a maximum approval limit of 10,000 DOT.
      - Voice of Fellows ranked at 4 or above can also reject or approve spend
      proposals, with a maximum approval limit of 10,000,000 DOT.
      
      Additionally, we introduce the Asset Rate Pallet Instance to establish
      conversion rates from asset A to B. This is used to determine if a
      proposed spend amount involving a non-native asset is permissible by the
      commanding origin. The rates can be set up by the Root, Treasurer
      origins, or Voice of all Fellows.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarjoe petrowski <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarjoepetrowski <[email protected]>
      da40d97a
  4. Dec 07, 2023
  5. Dec 06, 2023
  6. Dec 05, 2023
  7. Dec 04, 2023
  8. Dec 02, 2023
  9. Dec 01, 2023
  10. Nov 30, 2023
  11. Nov 29, 2023
    • Will | Paradox | ParaNodes.io's avatar
      Adding LuckyFriday's Bootnodes per IBP Application (#2538) · 2858cbc2
      Will | Paradox | ParaNodes.io authored
      Good day,
      
      This PR requests the inclusion of two bootnode entries for Polkadot,
      Kusama and Westend as part of LuckyFriday's IBP application. The nodes
      are hosted on self-owned hardware in a co-located facility. We've
      undertaken connectivity tests ourselves and also from members of the
      IBP.
      
      The test commands used are as follows:
      
      ```
      polkadot --chain westend --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-westend.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30334/wss/p2p/12D3KooWDg1YEytdwFFNWroFj6gio4YFsMB3miSbHKgdpJteUMB9" --no-hardware-benchmarks
      
      polkadot --chain westend --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-westend.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30333/p2p/12D3KooWDg1YEytdwFFNWroFj6gio4YFsMB3miSbHKgdpJteUMB9" --no-hardware-benchmarks
      
      polkadot --chain kusama --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-kusama.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30334/wss/p2p/12D3KooW9vu1GWHBuxyhm7rZgD3fhGZpNajPXFexadvhujWMgwfT" --no-hardware-benchmarks
      
      polkadot --chain kusama --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-kusama.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30333/p2p/12D3KooW9vu1GWHBuxyhm7rZgD3fhGZpNajPXFexadvhujWMgwfT" --no-hardware-benchmarks
      
      polkadot --chain polkadot --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-polkadot.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30334/wss/p2p/12D3KooWEjk6QXrZJ26fLpaajisJGHiz6WiQsR8k7mkM9GmWKnRZ" --no-hardware-benchmarks
      
      polkadot --chain polkadot --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-polkadot.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30333/p2p/12D3KooWEjk6QXrZJ26fLpaajisJGHiz6WiQsR8k7mkM9GmWKnRZ" --no-hardware-benchmarks
      ```
      
      All tests yielded syncing with 1 peer, a positive result. We have also
      backed up our node-key in the event that restoration is required.
      
      I hope that the aforementioned meets the requirement for inclusion and
      look forward to a speedy turnaround.
      
      Kind Regards,
      Will | Paradox
      2858cbc2
    • Bastian Köcher's avatar
      ParachainHost: No need to be generic over the block or hash type (#2537) · d3d301fa
      Bastian Köcher authored
      The `BlockNumber` and `Hash` are fixed types any way.
      d3d301fa
  12. Nov 28, 2023
    • Aaro Altonen's avatar
      Rework the event system of `sc-network` (#1370) · e71c484d
      Aaro Altonen authored
      This commit introduces a new concept called `NotificationService` which
      allows Polkadot protocols to communicate with the underlying
      notification protocol implementation directly, without routing events
      through `NetworkWorker`. This implies that each protocol has its own
      service which it uses to communicate with remote peers and that each
      `NotificationService` is unique with respect to the underlying
      notification protocol, meaning `NotificationService` for the transaction
      protocol can only be used to send and receive transaction-related
      notifications.
      
      The `NotificationService` concept introduces two additional benefits:
        * allow protocols to start using custom handshakes
        * allow protocols to accept/reject inbound peers
      
      Previously the validation of inbound connections was solely the
      responsibility of `ProtocolController`. This caused issues with light
      peers and `SyncingEngine` as `ProtocolController` would accept more
      peers than `SyncingEngine` could accept which caused peers to have
      differing views of their own states. `SyncingEngine` would reject excess
      peers but these rejections were not properly communicated to those peers
      causing them to assume that they were accepted.
      
      With `NotificationService`, the local handshake is not sent to remote
      peer if peer is rejected which allows it to detect that it was rejected.
      
      This commit also deprecates the use of `NetworkEventStream` for all
      notification-related events and going forward only DHT events are
      provided through `NetworkEventStream`. If protocols wish to follow each
      other's events, they must introduce additional abtractions, as is done
      for GRANDPA and transactions protocols by following the syncing protocol
      through `SyncEventStream`.
      
      Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/512
      Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/514
      Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/515
      Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/554
      Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/556
      
      ---
      These changes are transferred from
      https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/14197
      
       but there are no
      functional changes compared to that PR
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDmitry Markin <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexandru Vasile <[email protected]>
      e71c484d
    • André Silva's avatar
      polkadot: remove grandpa pause support (#2511) · b0b4451f
      André Silva authored
      This was never used and we probably don't need it anyway.
      b0b4451f
    • s0me0ne-unkn0wn's avatar
    • Marcin S.'s avatar
      PVF: Add test instructions (#2058) · dbd8d20b
      Marcin S. authored
      dbd8d20b
    • gupnik's avatar
      Moves all test runtimes to use `derive_impl` (#2409) · cd8741c8
      gupnik authored
      Step in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/171
      
      
      
      This PR adds `derive_impl` on all `frame_system` config impls for mock
      runtimes. The overridden configs are maintained as of now to ensure
      minimal changes.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      cd8741c8
    • André Silva's avatar
      polkadot: disable block authoring backoff on production networks (#2510) · 58a1f9c5
      André Silva authored
      Currently the polkadot node will backoff from block authoring if
      finality starts lagging. This PR disables this mechanism on production
      networks (polkadot and kusama) and adds a flags to optionally force
      enabling it.
      58a1f9c5
    • Svyatoslav Nikolsky's avatar
      Added NetworkId::PolkadotBulletin variant (#2517) · 0f7ffc66
      Svyatoslav Nikolsky authored
      We're going to bridge Polkadot Bridge Hub with [Polkadot Bulletin
      chain](https://github.com/zdave-parity/polkadot-bulletin-chain) soon
      (and Rococo Bridge Hub with 1:1 copy of Polkadot Bulletin chain even
      sooner), so we need a variant for that chain in `NetworkId`. As
      suggested, I'm adding a new variant for it to the `NetworkId` (we may
      have used `ByGenesis(_)`, but decision was made to have a dedicated
      variant for that).
      0f7ffc66
    • Ross Bulat's avatar
      Pools: Add ability to configure commission claiming permissions (#2474) · 75062717
      Ross Bulat authored
      Addresses #409.
      
      This request has been raised by multiple community members - the ability
      for the nomination pool root role to configure permissionless commission
      claiming:
      
      > Would it be possible to have a claim_commission_other extrinsic for
      claiming commission of nomination pools permissionless?
      
      This PR does not quite introduce this additional call, but amends
      `do_claim_commission` to check a new `claim_permission` field in the
      `Commission` struct, configured by an enum:
      
      ```
      enum CommissionClaimPermission {
         Permissionless,
         Account(AccountId),
      }
      ```
      This can be optionally set in a bonded pool's
      `commission.claim_permission` field:
      
      ```
      struct BondedPool {
         commission: {
            <snip>
            claim_permission: Option<CommissionClaimPermission<T::AccountId>>,
         },
         <snip>
      }
      ```
      
      This is a new field and requires a migration to add it to existing
      pools. This will be `None` on pool creation, falling back to the `root`
      role having sole access to claim commission if it is not set; this is
      the behaviour as it is today. Once set, the field _can_ be set to `None`
      again.
      
      #### Changes
      - [x] Add `commision.claim_permission` field.
      - [x] Add `can_claim_commission` and amend `do_claim_commission`.
      - [x] Add `set_commission_claim_permission` call.
      - [x] Test to cover new configs and call.
      - [x] Add and amend benchmarks.
      - [x] Generate new weights + slot into call
      `set_commission_claim_permission`.
      - [x] Add migration to introduce `commission.claim_permission`, bump
      storage version.
      - [x] Update Westend weights.
      - [x] Migration working.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      75062717