Treasury Pallet Instance for the Fellowship in Westend Collectives.

In this update, we present a Treasury Pallet Instance that is under the
control of the Fellowship body, with oversight from the Root and
Treasurer origins. Here's how it is governed:
- the Root origin have the authority to reject or approve spend
proposals, with no amount limit for approvals.
- the Treasurer origin have the authority to reject or approve spend
proposals, with approval limits of up to 10,000,000 DOT.
- Voice of all Fellows ranked at 3 or above can reject or approve spend
proposals, with a maximum approval limit of 10,000 DOT.
- Voice of Fellows ranked at 4 or above can also reject or approve spend
proposals, with a maximum approval limit of 10,000,000 DOT.

Additionally, we introduce the Asset Rate Pallet Instance to establish
conversion rates from asset A to B. This is used to determine if a
proposed spend amount involving a non-native asset is permissible by the
commanding origin. The rates can be set up by the Root, Treasurer
origins, or Voice of all Fellows.

---------

Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: joepetrowski <[email protected]>

Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2641

As suggested in this thread:
https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/87#discussion_r1400237122

We already have the `IsChildSystemParachain`, which may be used at relay
chain, but it can't be used at a parachain level. So let's use
`AllSiblingSystemParachains` for that. I was thinking about
`AllSystemParachains`, but it may cause wrong impression that it can be
used at a relay chain level.

---------

Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]>

# Motivation (+testing)

### Enable easy `ForeignAssets` transfers using `pallet-xcm` 

We had just previously added capabilities to teleport fees during
reserve-based transfers, but what about reserve-transferring fees when
needing to teleport some non-fee asset?

This PR aligns everything under either explicit reserve-transfer,
explicit teleport, or this new flexible `transfer_assets()` which can
mix and match as needed with fewer artificial constraints imposed to the
user.

This will enable, for example, a (non-system) parachain to teleport
their `ForeignAssets` assets to AssetHub while using DOT to pay fees.
(the assets are teleported - as foreign assets should from their owner
chain - while DOT used for fees can only be reserve-based transferred
between said parachain and AssetHub).

Added `xcm-emulator` tests for this scenario ^.

# Description

Reverts `(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets` to only allow reserve-based
transfers for all `assets` including fees.

Similarly `(limited_)teleport_assets` only allows teleports for all
`assets` including fees.
    
For complex combinations of asset transfers where assets and fees may
have different reserves or different reserve/teleport trust
configurations, users can use the newly added `transfer_assets()`
extrinsic which is more flexible in allowing more complex scenarios.

`assets` (excluding `fees`) must have same reserve location or otherwise
be teleportable to `dest`.
No limitations imposed on `fees`.

- for local reserve: transfer assets to sovereign account of destination
chain and forward a notification XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit
reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`.
- for destination reserve: burn local assets and forward a notification
to `dest` chain to withdraw the reserve assets from this chain's
sovereign account and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
- for remote reserve: burn local assets, forward XCM to reserve chain to
move reserves from this chain's SA to `dest` chain's SA, and forward
another XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to
`beneficiary`.
- for teleports: burn local assets and forward XCM to `dest` chain to
mint/teleport assets and deposit them to `beneficiary`.

## Review notes

Only around 500 lines are prod code (see `pallet_xcm/src/lib.rs`), the
rest of the PR is new tests and improving existing tests.

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

Using taplo, fixes all our broken and inconsistent toml formatting and
adds CI to keep them tidy.

If people want we can customise the format rules as described here
https://taplo.tamasfe.dev/configuration/formatter-options.html

@ggwpez

, I suggest zepter is used only for checking features are
propagated, and leave formatting for taplo to avoid duplicate work and
conflicts.

TODO
- [x] Use `exclude = [...]` syntax in taplo file to ignore zombienet
tests instead of deleting the dir

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>

Bumps the known_good_semver group with 2 updates:
[serde](https://github.com/serde-rs/serde) and
[clap](https://github.com/clap-rs/clap).

Updates `serde` from 1.0.188 to 1.0.193
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/releases">serde's
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>v1.0.193</h2>
<ul>
<li>Fix field names used for the deserialization of
<code>RangeFrom</code> and <code>RangeTo</code> (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/2653">#2653</a>,
<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/2654">#2654</a>,
<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/2655">#2655</a>,
thanks <a
href="https://github.com/emilbonnek"><code>@​emilbonnek</code></a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>v1.0.192</h2>
<ul>
<li>Allow internal tag field in untagged variant (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/2646">#2646</a>,
thanks <a
href="https://github.com/robsdedude"><code>@​robsdedude</code></a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>v1.0.191</h2>
<ul>
<li>Documentation improvements</li>
</ul>
<h2>v1.0.190</h2>
<ul>
<li>Preserve NaN sign when deserializing f32 from f64 or vice versa (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/2637">#2637</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>v1.0.189</h2>
<ul>
<li>Fix &quot;cannot infer type&quot; error when internally tagged enum
contains untagged variant (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/2613">#2613</a>,
thanks <a href="https://github.com/ahl"><code>@​ahl</code></a>)</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/commit/44613c7d0190dbb5ecd2d5ec19c636f45b7488cc"><code>44613c7</code></a>
Release 1.0.193</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/commit/c706281df3c8d50dba1763f19c856df2746eba6c"><code>c706281</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/2655">#2655</a>
from dtolnay/rangestartend</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/commit/65d75b8fe3105f00ab2e01537d568d4587167582"><code>65d75b8</code></a>
Add RangeFrom and RangeTo tests</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/commit/332b0cba40bcbcc7a6b23a9706277c54791a9856"><code>332b0cb</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/2654">#2654</a>
from dtolnay/rangestartend</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/commit/8c4af412969086bc8f54fdc2a079d373632e0a03"><code>8c4af41</code></a>
Fix more RangeFrom / RangeEnd mixups</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/commit/24a78f071b22ae491eec4127be696ac255b9b5d3"><code>24a78f0</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/2653">#2653</a>
from emilbonnek/fix/range-to-from-de-mixup</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/commit/c91c33436d7aaef7472ebc18b734ddc9b5bd11fa"><code>c91c334</code></a>
Fix Range{From,To} deserialize mixup</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/commit/2083f43a287cac8302009fda5bbe41518dd83209"><code>2083f43</code></a>
Update ui test suite to nightly-2023-11-19</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/commit/4676abdc9e6bbbddfb33a00ce8d7e81e92f01120"><code>4676abd</code></a>
Release 1.0.192</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/commit/35700eb23e21d8cb198ef4a422ddad13b855ce3b"><code>35700eb</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/2646">#2646</a>
from robsdedude/fix/2643/allow-tag-field-in-untagged</li>
<li>Additional commits viewable in <a
href="https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/compare/v1.0.188...v1.0.193">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />

Updates `clap` from 4.4.6 to 4.4.10
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/releases">clap's
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>v4.4.10</h2>
<h2>[4.4.10] - 2023-11-28</h2>
<h3>Documentation</h3>
<ul>
<li>Link out to changelog</li>
<li>Cross link derive's attribute reference to derive tutorial</li>
</ul>
<h2>v4.4.9</h2>
<h2>[4.4.9] - 2023-11-27</h2>
<h3>Fixes</h3>
<ul>
<li><em>(help)</em> Show correct <code>Command::about</code> under
flattened headings</li>
<li><em>(help)</em> Respect <code>hide</code> when flattening
subcommands</li>
</ul>
<h2>v4.4.8</h2>
<h2>[4.4.8] - 2023-11-10</h2>
<h3>Features</h3>
<ul>
<li>Add <code>Command::flatten_help</code> to allow <code>git stash
-h</code> like help for subcommands</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Changelog</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md">clap's
changelog</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>[4.4.10] - 2023-11-28</h2>
<h3>Documentation</h3>
<ul>
<li>Link out to changelog</li>
<li>Cross link derive's attribute reference to derive tutorial</li>
</ul>
<h2>[4.4.9] - 2023-11-27</h2>
<h3>Fixes</h3>
<ul>
<li><em>(help)</em> Show correct <code>Command::about</code> under
flattened headings</li>
<li><em>(help)</em> Respect <code>hide</code> when flattening
subcommands</li>
</ul>
<h2>[4.4.8] - 2023-11-10</h2>
<h3>Features</h3>
<ul>
<li>Add <code>Command::flatten_help</code> to allow <code>git stash
-h</code> like help for subcommands</li>
</ul>
<h2>[4.4.7] - 2023-10-24</h2>
<h3>Performance</h3>
<ul>
<li>Reduced code size</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/commit/c0a1814d3c1d93c18faaedc95fd251846e47f4fe"><code>c0a1814</code></a>
chore: Release</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/commit/c83e681e20b05f7e128088f47f8fcfc44e8ea166"><code>c83e681</code></a>
docs: Update changelog</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/commit/91bcac4ca9d442786f554abeb7b1ed6d7a464a42"><code>91bcac4</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/clap-rs/clap/issues/5230">#5230</a>
from epage/migrate</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/commit/030d87505d150345ddd425c1df21c034d2ae7748"><code>030d875</code></a>
docs: Link out to the changelog at the relevant tag</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/commit/b661a9de04aebd1adaaafdbf7e470f07a8d8a36d"><code>b661a9d</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/clap-rs/clap/issues/5229">#5229</a>
from epage/derive</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/commit/a08587b00e347492165ded1415bad6ab339e9f0b"><code>a08587b</code></a>
docs(derive): Link to tutorial sections for attributes</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/commit/21b671f689bc0b8d790dc8c42902c22822bf6f82"><code>21b671f</code></a>
chore: Release</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/commit/93ba76dbaaf9136313a4fe2978693cc39fa467dd"><code>93ba76d</code></a>
docs: Update changelog</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/commit/c1c55b30d853446e2cab78664c0d22c1b77d4dfd"><code>c1c55b3</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/clap-rs/clap/issues/5228">#5228</a>
from epage/flat</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/commit/b13f6d98622b80ba30e63c2c6e65d218cc8a4de3"><code>b13f6d9</code></a>
fix(help): Hide 'help' if only flattened subcommand</li>
<li>Additional commits viewable in <a
href="https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/compare/v4.4.6...v4.4.10">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />


Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.

[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)

---

<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore <dependency name> major version` will close this
group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific
dependency's major version (unless you unignore this specific
dependency's major version or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore <dependency name> minor version` will close this
group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific
dependency's minor version (unless you unignore this specific
dependency's minor version or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore <dependency name>` will close this group update PR
and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency
(unless you unignore this specific dependency or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot unignore <dependency name>` will remove all of the ignore
conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot unignore <dependency name> <ignore condition>` will
remove the ignore condition of the specified dependency and ignore
conditions


</details>

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

Follow up to fix a bug from #1814 discovered in XCM emulator testing.

I mistakenly thought that checking out an asset would withdraw it from
the sender. This actually withdraws the asset before checking out.

---------

Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]>

The `BlockNumber` and `Hash` are fixed types any way.

Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Vladimir Istyufeev <[email protected]>

Addresses #409.

This request has been raised by multiple community members - the ability
for the nomination pool root role to configure permissionless commission
claiming:

> Would it be possible to have a claim_commission_other extrinsic for
claiming commission of nomination pools permissionless?

This PR does not quite introduce this additional call, but amends
`do_claim_commission` to check a new `claim_permission` field in the
`Commission` struct, configured by an enum:

```
enum CommissionClaimPermission {
   Permissionless,
   Account(AccountId),
}
```
This can be optionally set in a bonded pool's
`commission.claim_permission` field:

```
struct BondedPool {
   commission: {
      <snip>
      claim_permission: Option<CommissionClaimPermission<T::AccountId>>,
   },
   <snip>
}
```

This is a new field and requires a migration to add it to existing
pools. This will be `None` on pool creation, falling back to the `root`
role having sole access to claim commission if it is not set; this is
the behaviour as it is today. Once set, the field _can_ be set to `None`
again.

#### Changes
- [x] Add `commision.claim_permission` field.
- [x] Add `can_claim_commission` and amend `do_claim_commission`.
- [x] Add `set_commission_claim_permission` call.
- [x] Test to cover new configs and call.
- [x] Add and amend benchmarks.
- [x] Generate new weights + slot into call
`set_commission_claim_permission`.
- [x] Add migration to introduce `commission.claim_permission`, bump
storage version.
- [x] Update Westend weights.
- [x] Migration working.

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

## Overview

This PR aligns the `spec_version` formatting to the [recent
changes](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/26/files#diff-efa4caeb17487ecb13d8f5eb7863c3241d84afa2e73fbf25909a2ca89df0f362R142)
made for the Polkadot/Kusama runtimes.

It also backports the latest version `v1.4.0` bumps as `1_004_000`.

## Details

During the switch from `v0.9` to `v1.x`, the format of the
`spec_version` was modified from: `(M)m_ppp` for a runtime considered on
version `M.m.pp`. For instance `0.9.42` had a `spec_version` of `9420`.

With the transition to `v1.x`, the format was changed to a bigger number
(still `u32`) formatted as `MM_mm_ppp` where `1.2.3` would be stored as
`01_02_003`.

This PR aligns the format with that has been introduced in the
fellowship repo: `MMM_mmm_ppp`.

---------

Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>

Deprecates `RewardDestination::Controller` variant.

- [x] `RewardDestination::Controller` annotated with `#[deprecated]`.
- [x] `Controller` variant is now handled the same way as `Stash` in
`payout_stakers`.
- [x] `set_payee` errors if `RewardDestination::Controller` is provided.
- [x] Added `update_payee` call to lazily migrate
`RewardDestination::Controller` `Payee` storage entries to
`RewardDestination::Account(controller)` .
- [x] `payout_stakers_dead_controller` has been removed from benches &
weights - was not used.
- [x] Tests no longer use `RewardDestination::Controller`.

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]>

The versioned migrations are already there in pallet nomination-pools:

https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/f6ee4781/substrate/frame/nomination-pools/src/migration.rs#L27-L48

Just updating the kitchensink runtime to point to them.

This is also nice because it points the dev to an example of how to use
`VersionedMigration`.

Missed in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1672

Westend now successfully updated to `spec: 103000`, we **have to
remove** the session keys migration before the next release as it
doesn't gracefully handle reapplying it.

The goal of this PR is to migrate Identity deposits from the Relay Chain
to a system parachain.

The problem I want to solve is that `IdentityOf` and `SubsOf` both store
an amount that's held in reserve as a storage deposit. When migrating to
a parachain, we can take a snapshot of the actual `IdentityInfo` and
sub-account mappings, but should migrate (off chain) the `deposit`s to
zero, since the chain (and by extension, accounts) won't have any funds
at genesis.

The good news is that we expect parachain deposits to be significantly
lower (possibly 100x) on the parachain. That is, a deposit of 21 DOT on
the Relay Chain would need 0.21 DOT on a parachain. This PR proposes to
migrate the deposits in the following way:

1. Introduces a new pallet with two extrinsics: 
- `reap_identity`: Has a configurable `ReapOrigin`, which would be set
to `EnsureSigned` on the Relay Chain (i.e. callable by anyone) and
`EnsureRoot` on the parachain (we don't want identities reaped from
there).
- `poke_deposit`: Checks what deposit the pallet holds (at genesis,
zero) and attempts to update the amount based on the calculated deposit
for storage data.
2. `reap_identity` clears all storage data for a `target` account and
unreserves their deposit.
3. A `ReapIdentityHandler` teleports the necessary DOT to the parachain
and calls `poke_deposit`. Since the parachain deposit is much lower, and
was just unreserved, we know we have enough.

One awkwardness I ran into was that the XCMv3 instruction set does not
provide a way for the system to teleport assets without a fee being
deducted on reception. Users shouldn't have to pay a fee for the system
to migrate their info to a more efficient location. So I wrote my own
program and did the `InitiateTeleport` accounting on my own to send a
program with `UnpaidExecution`. Have discussed an
`InitiateUnpaidTeleport` instruction with @franciscoaguirre

 . Obviously
any chain executing this would have to pass a `Barrier` for free
execution.

TODO:

- [x] Confirm People Chain ParaId
- [x] Confirm People Chain deposit rates (determined in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2281)
- [x] Add pallet to Westend

---------

Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>

Adds a `NodeFeatures` bitfield value to the runtime `HostConfiguration`,
with the purpose of coordinating the enabling of node-side features,
such as: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/628 and
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/598.
These are features that require all validators enable them at the same
time, assuming all/most nodes have upgraded their node versions.

This PR doesn't add any feature yet. These are coming in future PRs.

Also adds a runtime API for querying the state of the client features
and an extrinsic for setting/unsetting a feature by its index in the bitfield.

Note: originally part of:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1644, but posted as
standalone to be reused by other PRs until the initial PR is merged

## Motivation

`pallet-xcm` is the main user-facing interface for XCM functionality,
including assets manipulation functions like `teleportAssets()` and
`reserve_transfer_assets()` calls.

While `teleportAsset()` works both ways, `reserve_transfer_assets()`
works only for sending reserve-based assets to a remote destination and
beneficiary when the reserve is the _local chain_.

## Solution

This PR enhances `pallet_xcm::(limited_)reserve_withdraw_assets` to
support transfers when reserves are other chains.
This will allow complete, **bi-directional** reserve-based asset
transfers user stories using `pallet-xcm`.

Enables following scenarios:
- transferring assets with local reserve (was previously supported iff
asset used as fee also had local reserve - now it works in all cases),
- transferring assets with reserve on destination,
- transferring assets with reserve on remote/third-party chain (iff
assets and fees have same remote reserve),
- transferring assets with reserve different than the reserve of the
asset to be used as fees - meaning can be used to transfer random asset
with local/dest reserve while using DOT for fees on all involved chains,
even if DOT local/dest reserve doesn't match asset reserve,
- transferring assets with any type of local/dest reserve while using
fees which can be teleported between involved chains.

All of the above is done by pallet inner logic without the user having
to specify which scenario/reserves/teleports/etc. The correct scenario
and corresponding XCM programs are identified, and respectively, built
automatically based on runtime configuration of trusted teleporters and
trusted reserves.

#### Current limitations:
- while `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CAN have different reserves (or
fees CAN be teleported), the remaining "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT, among
themselves, have different reserve locations (this is also implicitly
enforced by `MAX_ASSETS_FOR_TRANSFER=2`, but this can be safely
increased in the future).
- `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT have **different remote**
reserves (this could also be supported in the future, but adds even more
complexity while possibly not being worth it - we'll see what the future
holds).

Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1584
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2055

---------

Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>

Remove the `GRANDPA_AUTHORITIES_KEY` key and its usage. Apparently this
was used in the early days to communicate the grandpa authorities to the
node. However, we have now a runtime api that does this for us. So, this
pull request is moving from the custom managed storage item to a FRAME
managed storage item.

This pr also includes a migration for doing the switch on a running
chain.

---------

Co-authored-by: Davide Galassi <[email protected]>

We are introducing a new set of `XcmController` traits (final name yet
to be determined).
These traits are implemented by `pallet-xcm` and allows other pallets,
such as `pallet_contracts`, to rely on these traits instead of tight
coupling them to `pallet-xcm`.

Using only the existing Xcm traits would mean duplicating the logic from
`pallet-xcm` in these other pallets, which we aim to avoid. Our
objective is to ensure that when these APIs are called from
`pallet-contracts`, they produce the exact same outcomes as if called
directly from `pallet-xcm`.

The other benefits is that we can also expose return values to
`pallet-contracts` instead of just calling `pallet-xcm` dispatchable and
getting a `DispatchResult` back.

See traits integration in this PR
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1248, where the traits
are used as follow to define and implement `pallet-contracts` Config.
```rs
// Contracts config:
pub trait Config: frame_system::Config {
  // ...

  /// A type that exposes XCM APIs, allowing contracts to interact with other parachains, and
  /// execute XCM programs.
  type Xcm: xcm_executor::traits::Controller<
	  OriginFor<Self>,
	  <Self as frame_system::Config>::RuntimeCall,
	  BlockNumberFor<Self>,
  >;
}

// implementation
impl pallet_contracts::Config for Runtime {
        // ...

	type Xcm = pallet_xcm::Pallet<Self>;
}
```

---------

Co-authored-by: Alexander Theißen <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

As suggested by @ggwpez
(https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2142#discussion_r1388145872),
remove the `VersionChecked` prefix from version checked migrations (but
leave `VersionUnchecked` prefixes)

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

Changes:
- Adds a new call `remove_key` to the sudo pallet to permanently remove
the sudo key.
- Remove some clones and general maintenance

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

This PR exposes a `force_remove_vesting` through a ROOT call. 
See linked
[issue](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/269)

---------

Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]>

This PR updates the version of `serde_json` to `1.0.108` throughout the
codebase.

This PR is a follow up to #1661 

- [x] rename the `simple` module to `legacy`
- [x] fix benchmarks to disregard the number of additional fields
- [x] change the storage deposits to charge per encoded byte of the
identity information instance, removing the need for `fn
additional(&self) -> usize` in `IdentityInformationProvider`
- [x] ~add an extrinsic to rejig deposits to account for the change
above~
- [ ] ~ensure through proper configuration that the new byte-based
deposit is always lower than whatever is reserved now~
- [x] remove `IdentityFields` from the `set_fields` extrinsic signature,
as per [this
discussion](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1661#discussion_r1371703403)

> ensure through proper configuration that the new byte-based deposit is
always lower than whatever is reserved now

Not sure this is needed anymore. If the new deposits are higher than
what is currently on chain and users don't have enough funds to reserve
what is needed, the extrinisc fails and they're basically grandfathered
and frozen until they add more funds and/or make a change to their
identity. This behavior seems fine to me. Original idea
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1661#issuecomment-1779606319).

> add an extrinsic to rejig deposits to account for the change above

This was initially implemented but now removed from this PR in favor of
the implementation detailed
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2088).

---------

Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: joepetrowski <[email protected]>

helps https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/439.
closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/473.

PR link in the older substrate repository:
https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/13498.

# Context
Rewards payout is processed today in a single block and limited to
`MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator`. This number is currently 512 on both
Kusama and Polkadot.

This PR tries to scale the nominators payout to an unlimited count in a
multi-block fashion. Exposures are stored in pages, with each page
capped to a certain number (`MaxExposurePageSize`). Starting out, this
number would be the same as `MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator`, but
eventually, this number can be lowered through new runtime upgrades to
limit the rewardeable nominators per dispatched call instruction.

The changes in the PR are backward compatible.

## How payouts would work like after this change
Staking exposes two calls, 1) the existing `payout_stakers` and 2)
`payout_stakers_by_page`.

### payout_stakers
This remains backward compatible with no signature change. If for a
given era a validator has multiple pages, they can call `payout_stakers`
multiple times. The pages are executed in an ascending sequence and the
runtime takes care of preventing double claims.

### payout_stakers_by_page
Very similar to `payout_stakers` but also accepts an extra param
`page_index`. An account can choose to payout rewards only for an
explicitly passed `page_index`.

**Lets look at an example scenario**
Given an active validator on Kusama had 1100 nominators,
`MaxExposurePageSize` set to 512 for Era e. In order to pay out rewards
to all nominators, the caller would need to call `payout_stakers` 3
times.

- `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the first 512
nominators.
- `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the second set of 512
nominators.
- `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the last set of 76
nominators.
...
- `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => calling it the 4th time would
return an error `InvalidPage`.

The above calls can also be replaced by `payout_stakers_by_page` and
passing a `page_index` explicitly.

## Commission note
Validator commission is paid out in chunks across all the pages where
each commission chunk is proportional to the total stake of the current
page. This implies higher the total stake of a page, higher will be the
commission. If all the pages of a validator's single era are paid out,
the sum of commission paid to the validator across all pages should be
equal to what the commission would have been if we had a non-paged
exposure.

### Migration Note
Strictly speaking, we did not need to bump our storage version since
there is no migration of storage in this PR. But it is still useful to
mark a storage upgrade for the following reasons:

- New storage items are introduced in this PR while some older storage
items are deprecated.
- For the next `HistoryDepth` eras, the exposure would be incrementally
migrated to its corresponding paged storage item.
- Runtimes using staking pallet would strictly need to wait at least
`HistoryDepth` eras with current upgraded version (14) for the migration
to complete. At some era `E` such that `E >
era_at_which_V14_gets_into_effect + HistoryDepth`, we will upgrade to
version X which will remove the deprecated storage items.
In other words, it is a strict requirement that E<sub>x</sub> -
E<sub>14</sub> > `HistoryDepth`, where
E<sub>x</sub> = Era at which deprecated storages are removed from
runtime,
E<sub>14</sub> = Era at which runtime is upgraded to version 14.
- For Polkadot and Kusama, there is a [tracker
ticket](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/433) to clean
up the deprecated storage items.

### Storage Changes

#### Added
- ErasStakersOverview
- ClaimedRewards
- ErasStakersPaged

#### Deprecated
The following can be cleaned up after 84 eras which is tracked
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/433).

- ErasStakers.
- ErasStakersClipped.
- StakingLedger.claimed_rewards, renamed to
StakingLedger.legacy_claimed_rewards.

### Config Changes
- Renamed MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator to MaxExposurePageSize.

### TODO
- [x] Tracker ticket for cleaning up the old code after 84 eras.
- [x] Add companion.
- [x] Redo benchmarks before merge.
- [x] Add Changelog for pallet_staking.
- [x] Pallet should be configurable to enable/disable paged rewards.
- [x] Commission payouts are distributed across pages.
- [x] Review documentation thoroughly.
- [x] Rename `MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator` ->
`MaxExposurePageSize`.
- [x] NMap for `ErasStakersPaged`.
- [x] Deprecate ErasStakers.
- [x] Integrity tests.

### Followup issues
[Runtime api for deprecated ErasStakers storage
item](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/426)

---------

Co-authored-by: Javier Viola <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ross Bulat <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

# Description

The `trigger_defensive` call has been added to the `root-testing`
pallet. The idea is to have this pallet running on `Rococo/Westend` and
use it to verify if the runtime monitoring works end-to-end.

To accomplish this, `trigger_defensive` dispatches an event when it is
called.

Closes #1953

# Checklist

- [x] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the
"Description" section above
- [ ] My PR follows the [labeling requirements](CONTRIBUTING.md#Process)
of this project (at minimum one label for `T`
  required)
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if
applicable)
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works (if applicable)

You can remove the "Checklist" section once all have been checked. Thank
you for your contribution!

✄
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>

Closes https://github.com/paritytech/release-engineering/issues/6

Adds a new Github Workflow which on a new release being created, builds
and attaches all runtimes managed in this repository in two flavours:
- `dev-debug-build`: Built with the `try-runtime` feature and has
logging enabled
- `on-chain-release`: Built with the regular old `on-chain-release`
feature

The new Github Workflow could be extended in the future by the
@paritytech/release-engineering team to fully automate the release
process if they choose to, similar to how it is fully automated in the
Fellowship repo
(https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/blob/main/.github/workflows/release.yml).

The `on-chain-release` did not exist for parachains, so I added it. 

---

Tested on my fork: 
- https://github.com/liamaharon/polkadot-sdk/actions/runs/6663773523
- https://github.com/liamaharon/polkadot-sdk/releases/tag/test-6

---------

Co-authored-by: Chevdor <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]>

Fixes #179 

# Description

This PR makes the structure containing identity information used in
`pallet-identity` generic through the pallet `Config`. Additionally, the
old structure is now available in a separate module called `simple`
(pending rename) and is compatible with the new interface.

Another change in this PR is that while the `additional` field in
`IdentityInfo` stays for backwards compatibility reasons, the associated
costs are stil present in the pallet through the `additional` function
in the `IdentityInformationProvider` interface. This function is marked
as deprecated as it is only a temporary solution to the backwards
compatibility problem we had. In short, we could have removed the
additional fields in the struct and done a migration, but we chose to
wait and do it off-chain through the genesis of the system parachain.
After we move the identity pallet to the parachain, additional fields
will be migrated into the existing fields and the `additional` key-value
store will be removed. Until that happens, this interface will provide
the necessary information to properly account for the associated costs.

Additionally, this PR fixes an unrelated issue; the `IdentityField` enum
used to represent the fields as bitflags couldn't store more than 8
fields, even though it was marked as `#[repr(u64)]`. This was because of
the `derive` implementation of `TypeInfo`, which assumed `u8` semantics.
The custom implementation of this trait in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/commit/0105cc03


fixes the issue.

---------

Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sam Johnson <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]>

closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1882

## Breaking Changes

This PR introduces a new item to `pallet_balances::Config`:

```diff
trait Config {
++    type RuntimeFreezeReasons;
}
```

This value is only used to check it against `type MaxFreeze`. A similar
check has been added for `MaxHolds` against `RuntimeHoldReasons`, which
is already given to `pallet_balances`.

In all contexts, you should pass the real `RuntimeFreezeReasons`
generated by `construct_runtime` to `type RuntimeFreezeReasons`. Passing
`()` would also work, but it would imply that the runtime uses no
freezes at all.

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>

Reverts https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1476

The `lock_pallet` / `unlock_pallet` additions in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1814 will result in less
downtime for users than using runtime upgrades.

## Problem

This PR addresses the issue with testnet AssetHub builds, which was
discovered during the execution of `bot bench`.

https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/4038738
```
     Compiling asset-hub-rococo-runtime-wasm v1.0.0 (/builds/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/target/production/wbuild/asset-hub-rococo-runtime)
  warning: Linking globals named 'Core_version': symbol multiply defined!
  error: failed to load bitcode of module "rococo_runtime-8799ee884447805a.rococo_runtime.0bc572b8-cgu.0.rcgu.o": 
  warning: `asset-hub-rococo-runtime-wasm` (lib) generated 1 warning
  error: could not compile `asset-hub-rococo-runtime-wasm` (lib) due to previous error; 1 warning emitted
```

https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/4038739
```
Compiling asset-hub-westend-runtime-wasm v1.0.0 (/builds/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/target/production/wbuild/asset-hub-westend-runtime)
  warning: Linking globals named 'Core_version': symbol multiply defined!
  error: failed to load bitcode of module "westend_runtime-86d7844430f97d5c.westend_runtime.b7678d03-cgu.0.rcgu.o": 
  warning: `asset-hub-westend-runtime-wasm` (lib) generated 1 warning
  error: could not compile `asset-hub-westend-runtime-wasm` (lib) due to previous error; 1 warning emitted
```

## Solution

- Removed dependencies on `rococo-runtime` and `westend-runtime`
introduced by [this
PR](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1234/files#diff-a86375df98e04ca3cce1ea35c40257a222e2d5087f5f528ff33307678b78dc2dR534-R550).
- Replaced `<rococo_runtime::Treasury as PalletInfoAccess>::index()`
with `rococo_runtime_constants::TREASURY_PALLET_ID`.
- Added `check_treasury_pallet_id` to the relay runtimes to ensure that
the constant is aligned with the pallet id.
- Added "Rococo Treasury" to the waived locations (that will not be
charged fees in the executor) for `BridgeHubRococo` (to be aligned with
AssetHubs).

## References

[Full element discussion
here](https://matrix.to/#/!JUeaZUiYbdrvzvtwSL:parity.io/$2PnjYMsWRjR7M3oOfGuRI0XkjdoqJLtRcAPVcDLuLVg?via=parity.io&via=web3.foundation).

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

The `xcm` crate was renamed to `staging-xcm` to be able to publish it to
crates.io as someone as squatted `xcm`. The problem with this rename is
that the `TypeInfo` includes the crate name which ultimately lands in
the metadata. The metadata is consumed by downstream users like
`polkadot-js` or people building on top of `polkadot-js`. These people
are using the entire `path` to find the type in the type registry. Thus,
their code would break as the type path would now be [`staging_xcm`,
`VersionedXcm`] instead of [`xcm`, `VersionedXcm`]. This pull request
fixes this by renaming the path segment `staging_xcm` to `xcm`.

This requires: https://github.com/paritytech/scale-info/pull/197

---------

Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>

Combination of paritytech/polkadot#7005, its addon PR
paritytech/polkadot#7585 and its companion paritytech/cumulus#2433.

This PR introduces a new XcmFeesToAccount struct which implements the
`FeeManager` trait, and assigns this struct as the `FeeManager` in the
XCM config for all runtimes.

The struct simply deposits all fees handled by the XCM executor to a
specified account. In all runtimes, the specified account is configured
as the treasury account.

XCM __delivery__ fees are now being introduced (unless the root origin
is sending a message to a system parachain on behalf of the originating
chain).

# Note for reviewers

Most file changes are tests that had to be modified to account for the
new fees.
Main changes are in:
- cumulus/pallets/xcmp-queue/src/lib.rs <- To make it track the delivery
fees exponential factor
- polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/fee_handling.rs <- Added. Has the
FeeManager implementation
- All runtime xcm_config files <- To add the FeeManager to the XCM
configuration

# Important note

After this change, instructions that create and send a new XCM (Query*,
Report*, ExportMessage, InitiateReserveWithdraw, InitiateTeleport,
DepositReserveAsset, TransferReserveAsset, LockAsset and RequestUnlock)
will require the corresponding origin account in the origin register to
pay for transport delivery fees, and the onward message will fail to be
sent if the origin account does not have the required amount. This
delivery fee is on top of what we already collect as tx fees in
pallet-xcm and XCM BuyExecution fees!

Wallet UIs that want to expose the new delivery fee can do so using the
formula:

```
delivery_fee_factor * (base_fee + encoded_msg_len * per_byte_fee)
```

where the delivery fee factor can be obtained from the corresponding
pallet based on which transport you are using (UMP, HRMP or bridges),
the base fee is a constant, the encoded message length from the message
itself and the per byte fee is the same as the configured per byte fee
for txs (i.e. `TransactionByteFee`).

---------

Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Giles Cope <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <[email protected]>

Adds descriptions needed for publishing to crates.io.

cumulus: add asset-hub-rococo runtime based on asset-hub-kusama and add asset-bridging support to it (#1215)

This commit adds Rococo Asset Hub dedicated runtime so we can test new
features here, before merging them in Kusama Asset Hub.
Also adds one such feature: asset transfer over bridge (Rococo AssetHub
<> Wococo AssetHub)

- clone `asset-hub-kusama-runtime` -> `asset-hub-rococo-runtime`
- make it use Rococo primitives, names, assets, constants, etc
- add asset-transfer-over-bridge support to Rococo AssetHub <> Wococo
AssetHub

Fixes #1128

---------

Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>

Exposes disabled validators list via a runtime API.

---------

Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]>

[xcm] Use `Weight::MAX` for `reserve_asset_deposited`, `receive_teleported_asset` benchmarks (#1726)

# Description

## Summary

Previously, the `pallet_xcm::do_reserve_transfer_assets` and
`pallet_xcm::do_teleport_assets` functions relied on weight estimation
for remote chain execution, which was based on guesswork derived from
the local chain. This approach led to complications for runtimes that
did not provide or support specific [XCM
configurations](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76/polkadot/xcm/xcm-executor/src/config.rs#L43-L47)
for `IsReserve` or `IsTeleporter`. Consequently, such runtimes had to
resort to implementing hard-coded weights for XCM instructions like
`reserve_asset_deposited` or `receive_teleported_asset` to support
extrinsics such as `pallet_xcm::reserve_transfer_assets` and
`pallet_xcm::teleport_assets`, which depended on remote weight
estimation.

The issue of remote weight estimation was addressed and resolved by
[Pull Request
#1645](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1645), which
removed the need for remote weight estimation.

## Solution

As a continuation of this improvement, the current PR proposes further
cleanup by removing unnecessary hard-coded values and rectifying
benchmark results with `Weight::MAX` that previously used
`T::BlockWeights::get().max_block` as an override for unsupported XCM
instructions like `ReserveAssetDeposited` and `ReceiveTeleportedAsset`.


## Questions

- [x] Can we remove now also `Hardcoded till the XCM pallet is fixed`
for `deposit_asset`? E.g. for AssetHubKusama
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76/cumulus/parachains/runtimes/assets/asset-hub-kusama/src/weights/xcm/mod.rs#L129-L134)
- [x] Are comments like
[this](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76/polkadot/runtime/kusama/src/weights/xcm/mod.rs#L94)
`// Kusama doesn't support ReserveAssetDeposited, so this benchmark has
a default weight` still relevant? Shouldnt be removed/changed?


## TODO

- [x] `bench bot` regenerate xcm weights for all runtimes
- [x] remove hard-coded stuff from system parachain weight files
- [ ] when merged, open `polkadot-fellow/runtimes` PR

## References

Fixes #1132
Closes #1132
Old polkadot repo [PR](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7546)

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>