Skip to content
  1. Mar 27, 2024
  2. Mar 26, 2024
    • Pavel Orlov's avatar
      XCM Fee Payment Runtime API (#3607) · 3c972fc1
      Pavel Orlov authored
      
      
      The PR provides API for obtaining:
      - the weight required to execute an XCM message,
      - a list of acceptable `AssetId`s for message execution payment,
      - the cost of the weight in the specified acceptable `AssetId`.
      
      It is meant to address an issue where one has to guess how much fee to
      pay for execution. Also, at the moment, a client has to guess which
      assets are acceptable for fee execution payment.
      See the related issue
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/690.
      With this API, a client is supposed to query the list of the supported
      asset IDs (in the XCM version format the client understands), weigh the
      XCM program the client wants to execute and convert the weight into one
      of the acceptable assets. Note that the client is supposed to know what
      program will be executed on what chains. However, having a small
      companion JS library for the pallet-xcm and xtokens should be enough to
      determine what XCM programs will be executed and where (since these
      pallets compose a known small set of programs).
      ```Rust
      pub trait XcmPaymentApi<Call>
      	where
      		Call: Codec,
      	{
      		/// Returns a list of acceptable payment assets.
      		///
      		/// # Arguments
      		///
      		/// * `xcm_version`: Version.
      		fn query_acceptable_payment_assets(xcm_version: Version) -> Result<Vec<VersionedAssetId>, Error>;
      		/// Returns a weight needed to execute a XCM.
      		///
      		/// # Arguments
      		///
      		/// * `message`: `VersionedXcm`.
      		fn query_xcm_weight(message: VersionedXcm<Call>) -> Result<Weight, Error>;
      		/// Converts a weight into a fee for the specified `AssetId`.
      		///
      		/// # Arguments
      		///
      		/// * `weight`: convertible `Weight`.
      		/// * `asset`: `VersionedAssetId`.
      		fn query_weight_to_asset_fee(weight: Weight, asset: VersionedAssetId) -> Result<u128, Error>;
      		/// Get delivery fees for sending a specific `message` to a `destination`.
      		/// These always come in a specific asset, defined by the chain.
      		///
      		/// # Arguments
      		/// * `message`: The message that'll be sent, necessary because most delivery fees are based on the
      		///   size of the message.
      		/// * `destination`: The destination to send the message to. Different destinations may use
      		///   different senders that charge different fees.
      		fn query_delivery_fees(destination: VersionedLocation, message: VersionedXcm<()>) -> Result<VersionedAssets, Error>;
      	}
      ```
      An
      [example](https://gist.github.com/PraetorP/4bc323ff85401abe253897ba990ec29d)
      of a client side code.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAdrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDaniel Shiposha <[email protected]>
      3c972fc1
    • Tsvetomir Dimitrov's avatar
      Migrate parachain swaps to Coretime (#3714) · 90234543
      Tsvetomir Dimitrov authored
      This PR notifies broker pallet for any parachain slot swaps performed on
      the relay chain. This is achieved by registering an `OnSwap` for the the
      `coretime` pallet. The hook sends XCM message to the broker chain and
      invokes a new extrinsic `swap_leases` which updates `Leases` storage
      item (which keeps the legacy parachain leases).
      
      I made two assumptions in this PR:
      1.
      [`Leases`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/4987d798/substrate/frame/broker/src/lib.rs#L120)
      in `broker` pallet and
      [`Leases`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/4987d798
      
      /polkadot/runtime/common/src/slots/mod.rs#L118)
      in `slots` pallet are in sync.
      2. `swap_leases` extrinsic from `broker` pallet can be triggered only by
      root or by the XCM message from the relay chain. If not - the extrinsic
      will generate an error and do nothing.
      
      As a side effect from the changes `OnSwap` trait is moved from
      runtime/common/traits.rs to runtime/parachains. Otherwise it is not
      accessible from `broker` pallet.
      
      Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3552
      
      TODOs:
      
      - [x] Weights
      - [x] Tests
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatareskimor <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      90234543
    • Dcompoze's avatar
      Fix spelling mistakes across the whole repository (#3808) · 002d9260
      Dcompoze authored
      **Update:** Pushed additional changes based on the review comments.
      
      **This pull request fixes various spelling mistakes in this
      repository.**
      
      Most of the changes are contained in the first **3** commits:
      
      - `Fix spelling mistakes in comments and docs`
      
      - `Fix spelling mistakes in test names`
      
      - `Fix spelling mistakes in error messages, panic messages, logs and
      tracing`
      
      Other source code spelling mistakes are separated into individual
      commits for easier reviewing:
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'authority'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'prev_enqueud_messages'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'endpoint'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'children'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSiblingSovereignAccount'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSudoAccount'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'insufficient'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'PalletXcmExtrinsicsBenchmark'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'subtracted'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of '...
      002d9260
  3. Mar 23, 2024
  4. Mar 21, 2024
    • Alejandro Martinez Andres's avatar
      Revert `SendXcmOrigin` in Rococo & Westend (#2571) · 01d65f6b
      Alejandro Martinez Andres authored
      
      
      Based on issue
      [#2512](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2512), it
      seems that some ecosystem teams are using these networks to set up their
      staging environments and test certain use cases, some of them involving
      sending XCMs from the relay with origins not allowed in the current
      configuration.
      
      This change reverts the configuration of `SendXcmOrigin`.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAdrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
      01d65f6b
    • Alin Dima's avatar
      Elastic scaling: runtime dependency tracking and enactment (#3479) · 4842faf6
      Alin Dima authored
      
      
      Changes needed to implement the runtime part of elastic scaling:
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3131,
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3132,
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3202
      
      Also fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3675
      
      TODOs:
      
      - [x] storage migration
      - [x] optimise process_candidates from O(N^2)
      - [x] drop backable candidates which form cycles
      - [x] fix unit tests
      - [x] add more unit tests
      - [x] check the runtime APIs which use the pending availability storage.
      We need to expose all of them, see
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3576
      - [x] optimise the candidate selection. we're currently picking randomly
      until we satisfy the weight limit. we need to be smart about not
      breaking candidate chains while being fair to all paras -
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3573
      
      Relies on the changes made in
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3233 in terms of the
      inclusion policy and the candidate ordering
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avataralindima <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatareskimor <[email protected]>
      4842faf6
    • Egor_P's avatar
      [Backport] version bumps and prdocs reordering 1.9.0 (#3758) · 7b6b061e
      Egor_P authored
      This PR backports:
      - node version bump
      - `spec_vesion` bump
      - reordering of the `prdocs` to the appropriate folder
      from the `1.9.0` release branch
      7b6b061e
    • gupnik's avatar
      Migrates Westend to Runtime V2 (#3754) · 93b1abb2
      gupnik authored
      Step in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3688
      93b1abb2
  5. Mar 20, 2024
    • eskimor's avatar
      Fix algorithmic complexity of on-demand scheduler with regards to number of cores. (#3190) · b74353d3
      eskimor authored
      
      
      We witnessed really poor performance on Rococo, where we ended up with
      50 on-demand cores. This was due to the fact that for each core the full
      queue was processed. With this change full queue processing will happen
      way less often (most of the time complexity is O(1) or O(log(n))) and if
      it happens then only for one core (in expectation).
      
      Also spot price is now updated before each order to ensure economic back
      pressure.
      
      
      TODO:
      
      - [x] Implement
      - [x] Basic tests
      - [x] Add more tests (see todos)
      - [x] Run benchmark to confirm better performance, first results suggest
      > 100x faster.
      - [x] Write migrations
      - [x] Bump scale-info version and remove patch in Cargo.toml
      - [x] Write PR docs: on-demand performance improved, more on-demand
      cores are now non problematic anymore. If need by also the max queue
      size can be increased again. (Maybe not to 10k)
      
      Optional: Performance can be improved even more, if we called
      `pop_assignment_for_core()`, before calling `report_processed` (Avoid
      needless affinity drops). The effect gets smaller the larger the claim
      queue and I would only go for it, if it does not add complexity to the
      scheduler.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatareskimor <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarantonva <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAnton Vilhelm Ásgeirsson <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarordian <[email protected]>
      b74353d3
    • Tsvetomir Dimitrov's avatar
      Expose `ClaimQueue` via a runtime api and use it in `collation-generation` (#3580) · e58e854a
      Tsvetomir Dimitrov authored
      The PR adds two things:
      1. Runtime API exposing the whole claim queue
      2. Consumes the API in `collation-generation` to fetch the next
      scheduled `ParaEntry` for an occupied core.
      
      Related to https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1797
      e58e854a
  6. Mar 19, 2024
    • Davide Galassi's avatar
      Implement crypto byte array newtypes in term of a shared type (#3684) · 1e9fd237
      Davide Galassi authored
      Introduces `CryptoBytes` type defined as:
      
      ```rust
      pub struct CryptoBytes<const N: usize, Tag = ()>(pub [u8; N], PhantomData<fn() -> Tag>);
      ```
      
      The type implements a bunch of methods and traits which are typically
      expected from a byte array newtype
      (NOTE: some of the methods and trait implementations IMO are a bit
      redundant, but I decided to maintain them all to not change too much
      stuff in this PR)
      
      It also introduces two (generic) typical consumers of `CryptoBytes`:
      `PublicBytes` and `SignatureBytes`.
      
      ```rust
      pub struct PublicTag;
      pub PublicBytes<const N: usize, CryptoTag> = CryptoBytes<N, (PublicTag, CryptoTag)>;
      
      pub struct SignatureTag;
      pub SignatureBytes<const N: usize, CryptoTag> = CryptoBytes<N, (SignatureTag, CryptoTag)>;
      ```
      
      Both of them use a tag to differentiate the two types at a higher level.
      Downstream specializations will further specialize using a dedicated
      crypto tag. For example in ECDSA:
      
      
      ```rust
      pub struct EcdsaTag;
      
      pub type Public = PublicBytes<PUBLIC_KEY_SERIALIZED_SIZE, EcdsaTag>;
      pub type Signature = PublicBytes<PUBLIC_KEY_SERIALIZED_SIZE, EcdsaTag>;
      ```
      
      Overall we have a cleaner and most importantly **consistent** code for
      all the types involved
      
      All these details are opaque to the end user which can use `Public` and
      `Signature` for the cryptos as before
      1e9fd237
    • Matteo Muraca's avatar
      Removed `pallet::getter` usage from Beefy and MMR pallets (#3740) · 817870e3
      Matteo Muraca authored
      Part of #3326 
      
      cc @Kianenigma @ggwpez @liamaharon
      
       
      
      polkadot address: 12poSUQPtcF1HUPQGY3zZu2P8emuW9YnsPduA4XG3oCEfJVp
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMatteo Muraca <[email protected]>
      817870e3
    • Juan Ignacio Rios's avatar
      Add HRMP notification handlers to the xcm-executor (#3696) · 8b3bf39a
      Juan Ignacio Rios authored
      
      
      Currently the xcm-executor returns an `Unimplemented` error if it
      receives any HRMP-related instruction.
      What I propose here, which is what we are currently doing in our forked
      executor at polimec, is to introduce a trait implemented by the executor
      which will handle those instructions.
      
      This way, if parachains want to keep the default behavior, they just use
      `()` and it will return unimplemented, but they can also implement their
      own logic to establish HRMP channels with other chains in an automated
      fashion, without requiring to go through governance.
      
      Our implementation is mentioned in the [polkadot HRMP
      docs](https://arc.net/l/quote/hduiivbu), and it was suggested to us to
      submit a PR to add these changes to polkadot-sdk.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      8b3bf39a
  7. Mar 17, 2024
  8. Mar 15, 2024
  9. Mar 14, 2024
  10. Mar 13, 2024
    • georgepisaltu's avatar
      Revert "FRAME: Create `TransactionExtension` as a replacement for... · bbd51ce8
      georgepisaltu authored
      
      Revert "FRAME: Create `TransactionExtension` as a replacement for `SignedExtension` (#2280)" (#3665)
      
      This PR reverts #2280 which introduced `TransactionExtension` to replace
      `SignedExtension`.
      
      As a result of the discussion
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3623#issuecomment-1986789700),
      the changes will be reverted for now with plans to reintroduce the
      concept in the future.
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
      bbd51ce8
  11. Mar 11, 2024
  12. Mar 08, 2024
  13. Mar 07, 2024
    • Pablo Andrés Dorado Suárez's avatar
      fix(pallet-benchmarking): split test functions in v2 (#3574) · f4fbddec
      Pablo Andrés Dorado Suárez authored
      Closes #376
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      f4fbddec
    • Muharem Ismailov's avatar
      Deprecate xcm::body::TREASURER_INDEX constant, use standard Treasury varian instead (#3608) · 629506ce
      Muharem Ismailov authored
      Deprecate the `xcm::body::TREASURER_INDEX` constant and use the standard
      Treasury variant from the `xcm::BodyId` type instead.
      
      To align with the production runtimes:
      https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/149
      629506ce
    • Andrei Sandu's avatar
      ParaInherent create: update `apply_weight_limit` wrt elastic scaling (#3573) · c16fcc47
      Andrei Sandu authored
      
      
      Changes the way we perform the random selection of backed candidates
      when there isn't enough room for all of them. Instead of picking
      individual backed candidates `apply_weight` now operates on chains of
      candidates. This is fully backwards compatible and relies on the node
      side (provisioner/prospective parachains) doing the heavy lifting and
      providing the candidates in the order they form a chain.
      
      The same approach can be implemented for bitfields random selection once
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3479 is merged.
      
      The approach taken in this PR aims for reduced additional complexity at
      the cost of being less fair wrt how many backed candidates from each
      chain are picked. It favors elastic scaling parachains vs parachains not
      using elastic scaling, but from my perspective it should be fine as this
      should happen under exceptional circumstances like dispute storms.
      
      Note: to make things more fair we can consider specializing `random_sel`
      such that it will try to pick candidates one by one in the order
      provided by the provisioner such that non elastic scaling parachains
      have the same chance of getting a candidate backed.
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
      c16fcc47
  14. Mar 04, 2024
    • Gavin Wood's avatar
      FRAME: Create `TransactionExtension` as a replacement for `SignedExtension` (#2280) · fd5f9292
      Gavin Wood authored
      
      
      Closes #2160
      
      First part of [Extrinsic
      Horizon](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2415)
      
      Introduces a new trait `TransactionExtension` to replace
      `SignedExtension`. Introduce the idea of transactions which obey the
      runtime's extensions and have according Extension data (né Extra data)
      yet do not have hard-coded signatures.
      
      Deprecate the terminology of "Unsigned" when used for
      transactions/extrinsics owing to there now being "proper" unsigned
      transactions which obey the extension framework and "old-style" unsigned
      which do not. Instead we have __*General*__ for the former and
      __*Bare*__ for the latter. (Ultimately, the latter will be phased out as
      a type of transaction, and Bare will only be used for Inherents.)
      
      Types of extrinsic are now therefore:
      - Bare (no hardcoded signature, no Extra data; used to be known as
      "Unsigned")
      - Bare transactions (deprecated): Gossiped, validated with
      `ValidateUnsigned` (deprecated) and the `_bare_compat` bits of
      `TransactionExtension` (deprecated).
        - Inherents: Not gossiped, validated with `ProvideInherent`.
      - Extended (Extra data): Gossiped, validated via `TransactionExtension`.
        - Signed transactions (with a hardcoded signature).
        - General transactions (without a hardcoded signature).
      
      `TransactionExtension` differs from `SignedExtension` because:
      - A signature on the underlying transaction may validly not be present.
      - It may alter the origin during validation.
      - `pre_dispatch` is renamed to `prepare` and need not contain the checks
      present in `validate`.
      - `validate` and `prepare` is passed an `Origin` rather than a
      `AccountId`.
      - `validate` may pass arbitrary information into `prepare` via a new
      user-specifiable type `Val`.
      - `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to
      `Implicit`/`implicit`. It is encoded *for the entire transaction* and
      passed in to each extension as a new argument to `validate`. This
      facilitates the ability of extensions to acts as underlying crypto.
      
      There is a new `DispatchTransaction` trait which contains only default
      function impls and is impl'ed for any `TransactionExtension` impler. It
      provides several utility functions which reduce some of the tedium from
      using `TransactionExtension` (indeed, none of its regular functions
      should now need to be called directly).
      
      Three transaction version discriminator ("versions") are now
      permissible:
      - 0b000000100: Bare (used to be called "Unsigned"): contains Signature
      or Extra (extension data). After bare transactions are no longer
      supported, this will strictly identify an Inherents only.
      - 0b100000100: Old-school "Signed" Transaction: contains Signature and
      Extra (extension data).
      - 0b010000100: New-school "General" Transaction: contains Extra
      (extension data), but no Signature.
      
      For the New-school General Transaction, it becomes trivial for authors
      to publish extensions to the mechanism for authorizing an Origin, e.g.
      through new kinds of key-signing schemes, ZK proofs, pallet state,
      mutations over pre-authenticated origins or any combination of the
      above.
      
      ## Code Migration
      
      ### NOW: Getting it to build
      
      Wrap your `SignedExtension`s in `AsTransactionExtension`. This should be
      accompanied by renaming your aggregate type in line with the new
      terminology. E.g. Before:
      
      ```rust
      /// The SignedExtension to the basic transaction logic.
      pub type SignedExtra = (
      	/* snip */
      	MySpecialSignedExtension,
      );
      /// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime.
      pub type UncheckedExtrinsic =
      	generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, SignedExtra>;
      ```
      
      After:
      
      ```rust
      /// The extension to the basic transaction logic.
      pub type TxExtension = (
      	/* snip */
      	AsTransactionExtension<MySpecialSignedExtension>,
      );
      /// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime.
      pub type UncheckedExtrinsic =
      	generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, TxExtension>;
      ```
      
      You'll also need to alter any transaction building logic to add a
      `.into()` to make the conversion happen. E.g. Before:
      
      ```rust
      fn construct_extrinsic(
      		/* snip */
      ) -> UncheckedExtrinsic {
      	let extra: SignedExtra = (
      		/* snip */
      		MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */),
      	);
      	let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), extra.clone()).unwrap();
      	let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e));
      	UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed(
      		/* snip */
      		Signature::Sr25519(signature),
      		extra,
      	)
      }
      ```
      
      After:
      
      ```rust
      fn construct_extrinsic(
      		/* snip */
      ) -> UncheckedExtrinsic {
      	let tx_ext: TxExtension = (
      		/* snip */
      		MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */).into(),
      	);
      	let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), tx_ext.clone()).unwrap();
      	let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e));
      	UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed(
      		/* snip */
      		Signature::Sr25519(signature),
      		tx_ext,
      	)
      }
      ```
      
      ### SOON: Migrating to `TransactionExtension`
      
      Most `SignedExtension`s can be trivially converted to become a
      `TransactionExtension`. There are a few things to know.
      
      - Instead of a single trait like `SignedExtension`, you should now
      implement two traits individually: `TransactionExtensionBase` and
      `TransactionExtension`.
      - Weights are now a thing and must be provided via the new function `fn
      weight`.
      
      #### `TransactionExtensionBase`
      
      This trait takes care of anything which is not dependent on types
      specific to your runtime, most notably `Call`.
      
      - `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to
      `Implicit`/`implicit`.
      - Weight must be returned by implementing the `weight` function. If your
      extension is associated with a pallet, you'll probably want to do this
      via the pallet's existing benchmarking infrastructure.
      
      #### `TransactionExtension`
      
      Generally:
      - `pre_dispatch` is now `prepare` and you *should not reexecute the
      `validate` functionality in there*!
      - You don't get an account ID any more; you get an origin instead. If
      you need to presume an account ID, then you can use the trait function
      `AsSystemOriginSigner::as_system_origin_signer`.
      - You get an additional ticket, similar to `Pre`, called `Val`. This
      defines data which is passed from `validate` into `prepare`. This is
      important since you should not be duplicating logic from `validate` to
      `prepare`, you need a way of passing your working from the former into
      the latter. This is it.
      - This trait takes two type parameters: `Call` and `Context`. `Call` is
      the runtime call type which used to be an associated type; you can just
      move it to become a type parameter for your trait impl. `Context` is not
      currently used and you can safely implement over it as an unbounded
      type.
      - There's no `AccountId` associated type any more. Just remove it.
      
      Regarding `validate`:
      - You get three new parameters in `validate`; all can be ignored when
      migrating from `SignedExtension`.
      - `validate` returns a tuple on success; the second item in the tuple is
      the new ticket type `Self::Val` which gets passed in to `prepare`. If
      you use any information extracted during `validate` (off-chain and
      on-chain, non-mutating) in `prepare` (on-chain, mutating) then you can
      pass it through with this. For the tuple's last item, just return the
      `origin` argument.
      
      Regarding `prepare`:
      - This is renamed from `pre_dispatch`, but there is one change:
      - FUNCTIONALITY TO VALIDATE THE TRANSACTION NEED NOT BE DUPLICATED FROM
      `validate`!!
      - (This is different to `SignedExtension` which was required to run the
      same checks in `pre_dispatch` as in `validate`.)
      
      Regarding `post_dispatch`:
      - Since there are no unsigned transactions handled by
      `TransactionExtension`, `Pre` is always defined, so the first parameter
      is `Self::Pre` rather than `Option<Self::Pre>`.
      
      If you make use of `SignedExtension::validate_unsigned` or
      `SignedExtension::pre_dispatch_unsigned`, then:
      - Just use the regular versions of these functions instead.
      - Have your logic execute in the case that the `origin` is `None`.
      - Ensure your transaction creation logic creates a General Transaction
      rather than a Bare Transaction; this means having to include all
      `TransactionExtension`s' data.
      - `ValidateUnsigned` can still be used (for now) if you need to be able
      to construct transactions which contain none of the extension data,
      however these will be phased out in stage 2 of the Transactions Horizon,
      so you should consider moving to an extension-centric design.
      
      ## TODO
      
      - [x] Introduce `CheckSignature` impl of `TransactionExtension` to
      ensure it's possible to have crypto be done wholly in a
      `TransactionExtension`.
      - [x] Deprecate `SignedExtension` and move all uses in codebase to
      `TransactionExtension`.
        - [x] `ChargeTransactionPayment`
        - [x] `DummyExtension`
        - [x] `ChargeAssetTxPayment` (asset-tx-payment)
        - [x] `ChargeAssetTxPayment` (asset-conversion-tx-payment)
        - [x] `CheckWeight`
        - [x] `CheckTxVersion`
        - [x] `CheckSpecVersion`
        - [x] `CheckNonce`
        - [x] `CheckNonZeroSender`
        - [x] `CheckMortality`
        - [x] `CheckGenesis`
        - [x] `CheckOnlySudoAccount`
        - [x] `WatchDummy`
        - [x] `PrevalidateAttests`
        - [x] `GenericSignedExtension`
        - [x] `SignedExtension` (chain-polkadot-bulletin)
        - [x] `RefundSignedExtensionAdapter`
      - [x] Implement `fn weight` across the board.
      - [ ] Go through all pre-existing extensions which assume an account
      signer and explicitly handle the possibility of another kind of origin.
      - [x] `CheckNonce` should probably succeed in the case of a non-account
      origin.
      - [x] `CheckNonZeroSender` should succeed in the case of a non-account
      origin.
      - [x] `ChargeTransactionPayment` and family should fail in the case of a
      non-account origin.
        - [ ] 
      - [x] Fix any broken tests.
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandru Vasile <[email protected]>
      Signed-off-by: default avatardependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarNikhil Gupta <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarChevdor <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarMaciej <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJavier Viola <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarMarcin S. <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarTsvetomir Dimitrov <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJavier Bullrich <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarKoute <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAdrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: Vladimir Istyufeev's avatarVladimir Istyufeev <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarRoss Bulat <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarGonçalo Pestana <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarLiam Aharon <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarSvyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAndré Silva <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatars0me0ne-unkn0wn <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarordian <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarSebastian Kunert <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAaro Altonen <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDmitry Markin <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexandru Vasile <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexander Samusev <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJulian Eager <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarMichal Kucharczyk <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDavide Galassi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDónal Murray <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avataryjh <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarTom Mi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatardependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarWill | Paradox | ParaNodes.io <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJoshy Orndorff <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJoshy Orndorff <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarPG Herveou <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexander Theißen <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarKian Paimani <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJuan Girini <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarbader y <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJames Wilson <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarjoe petrowski <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarasynchronous rob <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarParth <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAndrew Jones <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJonathan Udd <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarSerban Iorga <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarEgor_P <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarEvgeny Snitko <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJust van Stam <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatargupnik <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatardzmitry-lahoda <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarzhiqiangxu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarNazar Mokrynskyi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAnwesh <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarcheme <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarSam Johnson <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarkianenigma <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJegor Sidorenko <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarMuharem <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarjoepetrowski <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarGabriel Facco de Arruda <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarSquirrel <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      fd5f9292
  15. Mar 01, 2024
  16. Feb 29, 2024
  17. Feb 28, 2024
    • Oliver Tale-Yazdi's avatar
      Multi-Block-Migrations, `poll` hook and new System callbacks (#1781) · eefd5fe4
      Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
      
      
      This MR is the merge of
      https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/14414 and
      https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/14275. It implements
      [RFC#13](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/RFCs/pull/13), closes
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/198.
      
      ----- 
      
      This Merge request introduces three major topicals:
      
      1. Multi-Block-Migrations
      1. New pallet `poll` hook for periodic service work
      1. Replacement hooks for `on_initialize` and `on_finalize` in cases
      where `poll` cannot be used
      
      and some more general changes to FRAME.  
      The changes for each topical span over multiple crates. They are listed
      in topical order below.
      
      # 1.) Multi-Block-Migrations
      
      Multi-Block-Migrations are facilitated by creating `pallet_migrations`
      and configuring `System::Config::MultiBlockMigrator` to point to it.
      Executive picks this up and triggers one step of the migrations pallet
      per block.
      The chain is in lockdown mode for as long as an MBM is ongoing.
      Executive does this by polling `MultiBlockMigrator::ongoing` and not
      allowing any transaction in a block, if true.
      
      A MBM is defined through trait `SteppedMigration`. A condensed version
      looks like this:
      ```rust
      /// A migration that can proceed in multiple steps.
      pub trait SteppedMigration {
      	type Cursor: FullCodec + MaxEncodedLen;
      	type Identifier: FullCodec + MaxEncodedLen;
      
      	fn id() -> Self::Identifier;
      
      	fn max_steps() -> Option<u32>;
      
      	fn step(
      		cursor: Option<Self::Cursor>,
      		meter: &mut WeightMeter,
      	) -> Result<Option<Self::Cursor>, SteppedMigrationError>;
      }
      ```
      
      `pallet_migrations` can be configured with an aggregated tuple of these
      migrations. It then starts to migrate them one-by-one on the next
      runtime upgrade.
      Two things are important here:
      - 1. Doing another runtime upgrade while MBMs are ongoing is not a good
      idea and can lead to messed up state.
      - 2. **Pallet Migrations MUST BE CONFIGURED IN `System::Config`,
      otherwise it is not used.**
      
      The pallet supports an `UpgradeStatusHandler` that can be used to notify
      external logic of upgrade start/finish (for example to pause XCM
      dispatch).
      
      Error recovery is very limited in the case that a migration errors or
      times out (exceeds its `max_steps`). Currently the runtime dev can
      decide in `FailedMigrationHandler::failed` how to handle this. One
      follow-up would be to pair this with the `SafeMode` pallet and enact
      safe mode when an upgrade fails, to allow governance to rescue the
      chain. This is currently not possible, since governance is not
      `Mandatory`.
      
      ## Runtime API
      
      - `Core`: `initialize_block` now returns `ExtrinsicInclusionMode` to
      inform the Block Author whether they can push transactions.
      
      ### Integration
      
      Add it to your runtime implementation of `Core` and `BlockBuilder`:
      ```patch
      diff --git a/runtime/src/lib.rs b/runtime/src/lib.rs
      @@ impl_runtime_apis! {
      	impl sp_block_builder::Core<Block> for Runtime {
      -		fn initialize_block(header: &<Block as BlockT>::Header) {
      +		fn initialize_block(header: &<Block as BlockT>::Header) -> RuntimeExecutiveMode {
      			Executive::initialize_block(header)
      		}
      
      		...
      	}
      ```
      
      # 2.) `poll` hook
      
      A new pallet hook is introduced: `poll`. `Poll` is intended to replace
      mostly all usage of `on_initialize`.
      The reason for this is that any code that can be called from
      `on_initialize` cannot be migrated through an MBM. Currently there is no
      way to statically check this; the implication is to use `on_initialize`
      as rarely as possible.
      Failing to do so can result in broken storage invariants.
      
      The implementation of the poll hook depends on the `Runtime API` changes
      that are explained above.
      
      # 3.) Hard-Deadline callbacks
      
      Three new callbacks are introduced and configured on `System::Config`:
      `PreInherents`, `PostInherents` and `PostTransactions`.
      These hooks are meant as replacement for `on_initialize` and
      `on_finalize` in cases where the code that runs cannot be moved to
      `poll`.
      The reason for this is to make the usage of HD-code (hard deadline) more
      explicit - again to prevent broken invariants by MBMs.
      
      # 4.) FRAME (general changes)
      
      ## `frame_system` pallet
      
      A new memorize storage item `InherentsApplied` is added. It is used by
      executive to track whether inherents have already been applied.
      Executive and can then execute the MBMs directly between inherents and
      transactions.
      
      The `Config` gets five new items:
      - `SingleBlockMigrations` this is the new way of configuring migrations
      that run in a single block. Previously they were defined as last generic
      argument of `Executive`. This shift is brings all central configuration
      about migrations closer into view of the developer (migrations that are
      configured in `Executive` will still work for now but is deprecated).
      - `MultiBlockMigrator` this can be configured to an engine that drives
      MBMs. One example would be the `pallet_migrations`. Note that this is
      only the engine; the exact MBMs are injected into the engine.
      - `PreInherents` a callback that executes after `on_initialize` but
      before inherents.
      - `PostInherents` a callback that executes after all inherents ran
      (including MBMs and `poll`).
      - `PostTransactions` in symmetry to `PreInherents`, this one is called
      before `on_finalize` but after all transactions.
      
      A sane default is to set all of these to `()`. Example diff suitable for
      any chain:
      ```patch
      @@ impl frame_system::Config for Test {
       	type MaxConsumers = ConstU32<16>;
      +	type SingleBlockMigrations = ();
      +	type MultiBlockMigrator = ();
      +	type PreInherents = ();
      +	type PostInherents = ();
      +	type PostTransactions = ();
       }
      ```
      
      An overview of how the block execution now looks like is here. The same
      graph is also in the rust doc.
      
      <details><summary>Block Execution Flow</summary>
      <p>
      
      ![Screenshot 2023-12-04 at 19 11
      29](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/10380170/e88a80c4-ef11-4faa-8df5-8b33a724c054)
      
      </p>
      </details> 
      
      ## Inherent Order
      
      Moved to https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2154
      
      ---------------
      
      
      ## TODO
      
      - [ ] Check that `try-runtime` still works
      - [ ] Ensure backwards compatibility with old Runtime APIs
      - [x] Consume weight correctly
      - [x] Cleanup
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarLiam Aharon <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJuan Girini <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarGavin Wood <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      eefd5fe4
    • Liam Aharon's avatar
      Runtime Upgrade ref docs and Single Block Migration example pallet (#1554) · 12ce4f7d
      Liam Aharon authored
      Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/55
      
      - Changes 'current storage version' terminology to less ambiguous
      'in-code storage version' (suggestion by @ggwpez
      
      )
      - Adds a new example pallet `pallet-example-single-block-migrations`
      - Adds a new reference doc to replace
      https://docs.substrate.io/maintain/runtime-upgrades/ (temporarily living
      in the pallet while we wait for developer hub PR to merge)
      - Adds documentation for the `storage_alias` macro
      - Improves `trait Hooks` docs 
      - Improves `trait GetStorageVersion` docs
      - Update the suggested patterns for using `VersionedMigration`, so that
      version unchecked migrations are never exported
      - Prevents accidental usage of version unchecked migrations in runtimes
      
      https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/14421#discussion_r1255467895
      - Unversioned migration code is kept inside `mod version_unchecked`,
      versioned code is kept in `pub mod versioned`
      - It is necessary to use modules to limit visibility because the inner
      migration must be `pub`. See
      https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/30905 and
      
      https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/lang-team-minutes-private-in-public-rules/4504/40
      for more.
      
      ### todo
      
      - [x] move to reference docs to proper place within sdk-docs (now that
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2102 is merged)
      - [x] prdoc
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarKian Paimani <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJuan <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatargupnik <[email protected]>
      12ce4f7d
  18. Feb 26, 2024
    • brenzi's avatar
      add Encointer as trusted teleporter for Westend (#3411) · 49266f10
      brenzi authored
      with the deprecation of Rococo, Encointer needs a new staging
      environment. Paseo will be Polkadot-focused and westend Kusama-focused,
      so we propose to use Westend
      49266f10
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      [pallet-xcm] Adjust benchmarks (teleport_assets/reserve_transfer_assets) not relying on ED (#3464) · 3d9439f6
      Branislav Kontur authored
      
      
      ## Problem
      During the bumping of the `polkadot-fellows` repository to
      `[email protected]`, I encountered a situation where the benchmarks
      `teleport_assets` and `reserve_transfer_assets` in AssetHubKusama
      started to fail. This issue arose due to a decreased ED balance for
      AssetHubs introduced
      [here](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/158/files#diff-80668ff8e793b64f36a9a3ec512df5cbca4ad448c157a5d81abda1b15f35f1daR213),
      and also because of a [missing CI
      pipeline](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/issues/197) to
      check the benchmarks, which went unnoticed.
      
      These benchmarks expect the `caller` to have enough:
      1. balance to transfer (BTT)
      2. balance for paying delivery (BFPD).
       
      So the initial balance was calculated as `ED * 100`, which seems
      reasonable:
      ```
      const ED_MULTIPLIER: u32 = 100;
      let balance = existential_deposit.saturating_mul(ED_MULTIPLIER.into());`
      ```
      The problem arises when the price for delivery is 100 times higher than
      the existential deposit. In other words, when `ED * 100` does not cover
      `BTT` + `BFPD`.
      
      I check AHR/AHW/AHK/AHP and this problem has only AssetHubKusama
      ```
      ED: 3333333
      calculated price to parent delivery:  1031666634  (from xcm logs from the benchmark)
      ---
      
      3333333 * 100 - BTT(3333333) - BFPD(1031666634) = −701666667
      ```
      which results in the error;
      ```
      2024-02-23 09:19:42 Unable to charge fee with error Module(ModuleError { index: 31, error: [17, 0, 0, 0], message: Some("FeesNotMet") })
      Error: Input("Benchmark pallet_xcm::reserve_transfer_assets failed: FeesNotMet")
           
      ```
      
      ## Solution
      
      The benchmarks `teleport_assets` and `reserve_transfer_assets` were
      fixed by removing `ED * 100` and replacing it with `DeliveryHelper`
      logic, which calculates the (almost real) price for delivery and sets it
      along with the existential deposit as the initial balance for the
      account used in the benchmark.
      
      
      ## TODO
      
      - [ ] patch for 1.6 -
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3466
      - [ ] patch for 1.7 -
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3465
      - [ ] patch for 1.8 - TODO: PR
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
      3d9439f6
    • eskimor's avatar
      Remove redundant parachains assigner pallet. (#3457) · ce5de995
      eskimor authored
      
      
      from Westend and Rococo.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatareskimor <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      ce5de995
  19. Feb 23, 2024
    • Andrei Sandu's avatar
      Runtime: allow backing multiple candidates of same parachain on different cores (#3231) · 2431001e
      Andrei Sandu authored
      
      
      Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3144
      
      Builds on top of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3229
      
      ### Summary
      Some preparations for Runtime to support elastic scaling, guarded by
      config node features bit `FeatureIndex::ElasticScalingMVP`. This PR
      introduces a per-candidate `CoreIndex` but does it in a hacky way to
      avoid changing `CandidateCommitments`, `CandidateReceipts` primitives
      and networking protocols.
      
      #### Including `CoreIndex` in `BackedCandidate`
      If the `ElasticScalingMVP` feature bit is enabled then
      `BackedCandidate::validator_indices` is extended by 8 bits.
      The value stored in these bits represents the assumed core index for the
      candidate.
      
      It is temporary solution which works by creating a mapping from
      `BackedCandidate` to `CoreIndex` by assuming the `CoreIndex` can be
      discovered by checking in which validator group the validator that
      signed the statement is.
      
      TODO:
      - [x] fix tests
      - [x] add new tests
      - [x] Bump runtime API for Kusama, so we have that node features thing!
      -> https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/194
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
      Signed-off-by: default avataralindima <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avataralindima <[email protected]>
      2431001e
    • Ignacio Palacios's avatar
      Fix `DepositReserveAsset` fees payment (#3340) · 11b5354f
      Ignacio Palacios authored
      The `fee` should be calculated with the reanchored asset, otherwise it
      could lead to a failure where the set aside fee ends up not being
      enough.
      
      @acatangiu
      
      
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAdrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
      11b5354f
  20. Feb 20, 2024
  21. Feb 19, 2024
    • Anton Vilhelm Ásgeirsson's avatar
      Add Coretime to Westend (#3319) · 320863a8
      Anton Vilhelm Ásgeirsson authored
      
      
      Adds the coretime and on demand pallets to enable Coretime on Westend. 
      In order for the migration to run successfully, we need the
      Broker/Coretime parachain to be live.
      
      TODO:
      - [ ] Broker parachain is live
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3272
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      320863a8