Skip to content
  1. Dec 14, 2023
  3. Dec 13, 2023
    • Squirrel's avatar
      Set clippy lints in workspace (requires rust 1.74) (#2390) · be8e6268
      Squirrel authored 
      

We currently use a bit of a hack in `.cargo/config` to make sure that
clippy isn't too annoying by specifying the list of lints.

There is now a stable way to define lints for a workspace. The only down
side is that every crate seems to have to opt into this so there's a
*few* files modified in this PR.

Dependencies:

- [x] PR that upgrades CI to use rust 1.74 is merged.

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarjoe petrowski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarLiam Aharon <[email protected]>
      be8e6268
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      Updated benchmarks related to the Rococo/Westend bridge (#2639) · 4c4407a8
      Branislav Kontur authored 
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      4c4407a8
    • Svyatoslav Nikolsky's avatar
      Tests for BridgeHub(s) <> remote GRANDPA chain (#2692) · 9ecb2d33
      Svyatoslav Nikolsky authored 
      So far the `bridge-hub-test-utils` contained a tests set for testing
BridgeHub runtime that is bridging with the remote **parachain**. But we
have https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2540 coming, which
would add Rococo <> Bulletin chain bridge (where Bulletin = standalone
chain that is using GRANDPA finality). Then it'll be expanded to
Polkadot BH as well.

So this PR adds the same set of tests to the `bridge-hub-test-utils`,
but for the case when remote chain is the chain with GRANDPA finality.
There's a lot of changes in this PR - I'll describe some:
- I've added `BasicParachainRuntime` trait to decrease number of lines
we need to add to `where` clause. Could revert, but imo it is useful;
- `cumulus/parachains/runtimes/bridge-hubs/test-utils/src/test_data` is
a submodule for generating test data for the test sets.
`from_parachain.rs` is used in tests for the case when remote chain is a
parachain, `from_grandpa_chain.rs` - for the bridges with remote GRANDPA
chains. `mod.rs` has some code, shared by both types of tests;
- `cumulus/parachains/runtimes/bridge-hubs/test-utils/src/test_data` is
a submodule with all test cases. The `mod.rs` has tests, suitable for
all cases. There's also `wth_parachain.rs` and `with_grandpa_chain.rs`
with the same meaning as above;
- I've merged the "core" code of two previous tests -
`relayed_incoming_message_works` and `complex_relay_extrinsic_works`
into one single `relayed_incoming_message_works` test. So now we are
always constructing extrinsics and are dispatching them using executive
module (meaning all signed extensions are also tested).

New test set is used here:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2540. Once this PR is
merged, I'll merge that other PR with master to remove duplicate
changes.

I'm also planning to cleanup generic constraints + remove some
unnecessary assumptions about used chains in a follow-up PRs. But for
now I think this PR has enough changes, so don't want to complicate it
even more.

---

Breaking changes for the code that have used those tests before:
- the `construct_and_apply_extrinsic` callback now accepts the
`RuntimeCall` instead of the `pallet_utility::Call`;
- the `construct_and_apply_extrinsic` now may be called multiple times
for the single test, so make sure the `frame_system::CheckNonce` is
correctly constructed;
- all previous tests have been moved from
`bridge_hub_test_utils::test_cases` to
`bridge_hub_test_utils::test_cases::from_parachain` module;
- there are several changes in test arguments - please refer to
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/compare/sv-tests-for-bridge-with-remote-grandpa-chain?expand=1#diff-79a28d4d3e1749050341c2424f00c4c139825b1a20937767f83e58b95166735c
for details.
      9ecb2d33
  5. Dec 12, 2023
    • Francisco Aguirre's avatar
      Fix ParentOrSiblings (#2428) · 313b2c4b
      Francisco Aguirre authored 
      

We were not filtering for sibling parachains, but for sibling anything

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      313b2c4b
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      Ensure xcm versions over bridge (on sending chains) (#2481) · 575b8f8d
      Branislav Kontur authored 
      ## Summary

This pull request proposes a solution for improved control of the
versioned XCM flow over the bridge (across different consensus chains)
and resolves the situation where the sending chain/consensus has already
migrated to a higher XCM version than the receiving chain/consensus.

## Problem/Motivation

The current flow over the bridge involves a transfer from AssetHubRococo
(AHR) to BridgeHubRococo (BHR) to BridgeHubWestend (BHW) and finally to
AssetHubWestend (AHW), beginning with a reserve-backed transfer on AHR.

In this process:
1. AHR sends XCM `ExportMessage` through `XcmpQueue`, incorporating XCM
version checks using the `WrapVersion` feature, influenced by
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion` (managed by
`pallet_xcm::force_xcm_version` or version discovery).

2. BHR handles the `ExportMessage` instruction, utilizing the latest XCM
version. The `HaulBlobExporter` converts the inner XCM to
[`VersionedXcm::from`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/63ac2471aa0210f0ac9903bdd7d8f9351f9a635f/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/universal_exports.rs#L465-L467),
also using the latest XCM version.

However, challenges arise:
- Incompatibility when BHW uses a different version than BHR. For
instance, if BHR migrates to **XCMv4** while BHW remains on **XCMv3**,
BHR's `VersionedXcm::from` uses `VersionedXcm::V4` variant, causing
encoding issues for BHW.
  ```
	/// Just a simulation of possible error, which could happen on BHW
	/// (this code is based on actual master without XCMv4)
	let encoded = hex_literal::hex!("0400");
	println!("{:?}", VersionedXcm::<()>::decode(&mut &encoded[..]));

Err(Error { cause: None, desc: "Could not decode `VersionedXcm`, variant
doesn't exist" })
  ``` 
- Similar compatibility issues exist between AHR and AHW.

## Solution

This pull request introduces the following solutions:

1. **New trait `CheckVersion`** - added to the `xcm` module and exposing
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion`. This enhancement allows checking the
actual XCM version for desired destinations outside of the `pallet_xcm`
module.

2. **Version Check in `HaulBlobExporter`** uses `CheckVersion` to check
known/configured destination versions, ensuring compatibility. For
example, in the scenario mentioned, BHR can store the version `3` for
BHW. If BHR is on XCMv4, it will attempt to downgrade the message to
version `3` instead of using the latest version `4`.

3. **Version Check in `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router`** - this check
ensures compatibility with the real destination's XCM version,
preventing the unnecessary sending of messages to the local bridge hub
if versions are incompatible.

These additions aim to improve the control and compatibility of XCM
flows over the bridge and addressing issues related to version
mismatches.

## Possible alternative solution

_(More investigation is needed, and at the very least, it should extend
to XCMv4/5. If this proves to be a viable option, I can open an RFC for
XCM.)._

Add the `XcmVersion` attribute to the `ExportMessage` so that the
sending chain can determine, based on what is stored in
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion`, the version the destination is using.
This way, we may not need to handle the version in `HaulBlobExporter`.

```
ExportMessage {
	network: NetworkId,
	destination: InteriorMultiLocation,
	xcm: Xcm<()>
	destination_xcm_version: Version, // <- new attritbute
},
```

```
pub trait ExportXcm {
        fn validate(
		network: NetworkId,
		channel: u32,
		universal_source: &mut Option<InteriorMultiLocation>,
		destination: &mut Option<InteriorMultiLocation>,
		message: &mut Option<Xcm<()>>,
                destination_xcm_version: Version, , // <- new attritbute
	) -> SendResult<Self::Ticket>;
```

## Future Directions

This PR does not fix version discovery over bridge, further
investigation will be conducted here:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2417.

## TODO

- [x] `pallet_xcm` mock for tests uses hard-coded XCM version `2` -
change to 3 or lastest?
- [x] fix `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router`
- [x] fix HaulBlobExporter with version determination
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/2183669d05f9b510f979a0cc3c7847707bacba2e/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/universal_exports.rs#L465)
- [x] add unit-tests to the runtimes
- [x] run benchmarks for `ExportMessage`
- [x] extend local run scripts about `force_xcm_version(dest, version)`
- [ ] when merged, prepare governance calls for Rococo/Westend
- [ ] add PRDoc

Part of: https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2719

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      575b8f8d
    • Chevdor's avatar
      Changelogs local generation (#1411) · 42a3afba
      Chevdor authored 
      

This PR introduces a script and some templates to use the prdoc involved
in a release and build:
- the changelog
- a simple draft of audience documentation

Since the prdoc presence was enforced in the middle of the version
1.5.0, not all PRs did come with a `prdoc` file.
This PR creates all the missing `prdoc` files with some minimum content
allowing to properly generate the changelog.
The generated content is **not** suitable for the audience
documentation.

The audience documentation will be possible with the next version, when
all PR come with a proper `prdoc`.

## Assumptions

- the prdoc files for release `vX.Y.Z` have been moved under
`prdoc/X.Y.Z`
- the changelog requires for now for the prdoc files to contain author +
topic. Thos fields are optional.

The build script can  be called as:
```
VERSION=X.Y.Z ./scripts/release/build-changelogs.sh
```

Related:
-  #1408

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarEgorPopelyaev <[email protected]>
      42a3afba
  7. Dec 08, 2023
    • Muharem Ismailov's avatar
      Westend: Fellowship Treasury (#2532) · da40d97a
      Muharem Ismailov authored 
      

Treasury Pallet Instance for the Fellowship in Westend Collectives.

In this update, we present a Treasury Pallet Instance that is under the
control of the Fellowship body, with oversight from the Root and
Treasurer origins. Here's how it is governed:
- the Root origin have the authority to reject or approve spend
proposals, with no amount limit for approvals.
- the Treasurer origin have the authority to reject or approve spend
proposals, with approval limits of up to 10,000,000 DOT.
- Voice of all Fellows ranked at 3 or above can reject or approve spend
proposals, with a maximum approval limit of 10,000 DOT.
- Voice of Fellows ranked at 4 or above can also reject or approve spend
proposals, with a maximum approval limit of 10,000,000 DOT.

Additionally, we introduce the Asset Rate Pallet Instance to establish
conversion rates from asset A to B. This is used to determine if a
proposed spend amount involving a non-native asset is permissible by the
commanding origin. The rates can be set up by the Root, Treasurer
origins, or Voice of all Fellows.

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarjoe petrowski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarjoepetrowski <[email protected]>
      da40d97a
  9. Dec 07, 2023
  11. Dec 06, 2023
    • Svyatoslav Nikolsky's avatar
      Added AllSiblingSystemParachains matcher to be used at a parachain level (#2422) · 0b3d0677
      Svyatoslav Nikolsky authored 
      As suggested in this thread:
https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/87#discussion_r1400237122



We already have the `IsChildSystemParachain`, which may be used at relay
chain, but it can't be used at a parachain level. So let's use
`AllSiblingSystemParachains` for that. I was thinking about
`AllSystemParachains`, but it may cause wrong impression that it can be
used at a relay chain level.

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarjoe petrowski <[email protected]>
      0b3d0677
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      Bridges subtree update (#2602) · be500fc2
      Branislav Kontur authored 
      ## Summary

This PR aligns Rococo/Westend bridge with latest Bridges repo
development:
- https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/pull/2727
- https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/pull/2728
- https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/pull/2729




Part of: https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2452
      be500fc2
    • Adrian Catangiu's avatar
      pallet-xcm: add new flexible `transfer_assets()` call/extrinsic (#2388) · e7651cf4
      Adrian Catangiu authored 
      # Motivation (+testing)

### Enable easy `ForeignAssets` transfers using `pallet-xcm` 

We had just previously added capabilities to teleport fees during
reserve-based transfers, but what about reserve-transferring fees when
needing to teleport some non-fee asset?

This PR aligns everything under either explicit reserve-transfer,
explicit teleport, or this new flexible `transfer_assets()` which can
mix and match as needed with fewer artificial constraints imposed to the
user.

This will enable, for example, a (non-system) parachain to teleport
their `ForeignAssets` assets to AssetHub while using DOT to pay fees.
(the assets are teleported - as foreign assets should from their owner
chain - while DOT used for fees can only be reserve-based transferred
between said parachain and AssetHub).

Added `xcm-emulator` tests for this scenario ^.

# Description

Reverts `(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets` to only allow reserve-based
transfers for all `assets` including fees.

Similarly `(limited_)teleport_assets` only allows teleports for all
`assets` including fees.
    
For complex combinations of asset transfers where assets and fees may
have different reserves or different reserve/teleport trust
configurations, users can use the newly added `transfer_assets()`
extrinsic which is more flexible in allowing more complex scenarios.

`assets` (excluding `fees`) must have same reserve location or otherwise
be teleportable to `dest`.
No limitations imposed on `fees`.

- for local reserve: transfer assets to sovereign account of destination
chain and forward a notification XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit
reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`.
- for destination reserve: burn local assets and forward a notification
to `dest` chain to withdraw the reserve assets from this chain's
sovereign account and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
- for remote reserve: burn local assets, forward XCM to reserve chain to
move reserves from this chain's SA to `dest` chain's SA, and forward
another XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to
`beneficiary`.
- for teleports: burn local assets and forward XCM to `dest` chain to
mint/teleport assets and deposit them to `beneficiary`.

## Review notes

Only around 500 lines are prod code (see `pallet_xcm/src/lib.rs`), the
rest of the PR is new tests and improving existing tests.

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      e7651cf4
  13. Dec 05, 2023
  15. Dec 04, 2023
  17. Dec 01, 2023
  19. Nov 30, 2023
  21. Nov 29, 2023
  23. Nov 28, 2023
  25. Nov 27, 2023
  27. Nov 24, 2023
  29. Nov 23, 2023
  31. Nov 21, 2023
  33. Nov 17, 2023
  35. Nov 16, 2023
  37. Nov 15, 2023
  39. Nov 14, 2023
  41. Nov 13, 2023
    • Adrian Catangiu's avatar
      pallet-xcm: enhance `reserve_transfer_assets` to support remote reserves (#1672) · 18257373
      Adrian Catangiu authored 
      ## Motivation

`pallet-xcm` is the main user-facing interface for XCM functionality,
including assets manipulation functions like `teleportAssets()` and
`reserve_transfer_assets()` calls.

While `teleportAsset()` works both ways, `reserve_transfer_assets()`
works only for sending reserve-based assets to a remote destination and
beneficiary when the reserve is the _local chain_.

## Solution

This PR enhances `pallet_xcm::(limited_)reserve_withdraw_assets` to
support transfers when reserves are other chains.
This will allow complete, **bi-directional** reserve-based asset
transfers user stories using `pallet-xcm`.

Enables following scenarios:
- transferring assets with local reserve (was previously supported iff
asset used as fee also had local reserve - now it works in all cases),
- transferring assets with reserve on destination,
- transferring assets with reserve on remote/third-party chain (iff
assets and fees have same remote reserve),
- transferring assets with reserve different than the reserve of the
asset to be used as fees - meaning can be used to transfer random asset
with local/dest reserve while using DOT for fees on all involved chains,
even if DOT local/dest reserve doesn't match asset reserve,
- transferring assets with any type of local/dest reserve while using
fees which can be teleported between involved chains.

All of the above is done by pallet inner logic without the user having
to specify which scenario/reserves/teleports/etc. The correct scenario
and corresponding XCM programs are identified, and respectively, built
automatically based on runtime configuration of trusted teleporters and
trusted reserves.

#### Current limitations:
- while `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CAN have different reserves (or
fees CAN be teleported), the remaining "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT, among
themselves, have different reserve locations (this is also implicitly
enforced by `MAX_ASSETS_FOR_TRANSFER=2`, but this can be safely
increased in the future).
- `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT have **different remote**
reserves (this could also be supported in the future, but adds even more
complexity while possibly not being worth it - we'll see what the future
holds).

Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1584
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2055



---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
      18257373
  43. Nov 10, 2023
    • PG Herveou's avatar
      Contracts: Add XCM traits to interface with contracts (#2086) · 6b7be115
      PG Herveou authored 
      We are introducing a new set of `XcmController` traits (final name yet
to be determined).
These traits are implemented by `pallet-xcm` and allows other pallets,
such as `pallet_contracts`, to rely on these traits instead of tight
coupling them to `pallet-xcm`.

Using only the existing Xcm traits would mean duplicating the logic from
`pallet-xcm` in these other pallets, which we aim to avoid. Our
objective is to ensure that when these APIs are called from
`pallet-contracts`, they produce the exact same outcomes as if called
directly from `pallet-xcm`.

The other benefits is that we can also expose return values to
`pallet-contracts` instead of just calling `pallet-xcm` dispatchable and
getting a `DispatchResult` back.

See traits integration in this PR
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1248

, where the traits
are used as follow to define and implement `pallet-contracts` Config.
```rs
// Contracts config:
pub trait Config: frame_system::Config {
  // ...

  /// A type that exposes XCM APIs, allowing contracts to interact with other parachains, and
  /// execute XCM programs.
  type Xcm: xcm_executor::traits::Controller<
	  OriginFor<Self>,
	  <Self as frame_system::Config>::RuntimeCall,
	  BlockNumberFor<Self>,
  >;
}

// implementation
impl pallet_contracts::Config for Runtime {
        // ...

	type Xcm = pallet_xcm::Pallet<Self>;
}
```

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexander Theißen <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      6b7be115
  45. Nov 08, 2023