Skip to content
  1. Apr 12, 2024
  2. Apr 11, 2024
  3. Apr 10, 2024
  4. Apr 08, 2024
    • Oliver Tale-Yazdi's avatar
      [FRAME] Runtime Omni Bencher (#3512) · 9543d314
      Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
      This MR contains two major changes and some maintenance cleanup.  
      
      ## 1. Free Standing Pallet Benchmark Runner
      
      Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3045, depends
      on your runtime exposing the `GenesisBuilderApi` (like
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1492).
      
      Introduces a new binary crate: `frame-omni-bencher`.  
      It allows to directly benchmark a WASM blob - without needing a node or
      chain spec.
      
      This makes it much easier to generate pallet weights and should allow us
      to remove bloaty code from the node.
      It should work for all FRAME runtimes that dont use 3rd party host calls
      or non `BlakeTwo256` block hashing (basically all polkadot parachains
      should work).
      
      It is 100% backwards compatible with the old CLI args, when the `v1`
      compatibility command is used. This is done to allow for forwards
      compatible addition of new commands.
      
      ### Example (full example in the Rust docs)
      
      Installing the CLI:
      ```sh
      cargo install --locked --path subs...
      9543d314
  5. Apr 02, 2024
    • Dastan's avatar
      migrations: prevent accidentally using unversioned migrations instead of... · e5427969
      Dastan authored
      migrations: prevent accidentally using unversioned migrations instead of `VersionedMigration` (#3835)
      
      closes #1324 
      
      #### Problem
      Currently, it is possible to accidentally use inner unversioned
      migration instead of `VersionedMigration` since both implement
      `OnRuntimeUpgrade`.
      
      #### Solution
      
      With this change, we make it clear that value of `Inner` is not intended
      to be used directly. It is achieved by bounding `Inner` to new trait
      `UncheckedOnRuntimeUpgrade`, which has the same interface (except
      `unchecked_` prefix) as `OnRuntimeUpgrade`.
      
      #### `try-runtime` functions
      
      Since developers can implement `try-runtime` for `Inner` value in
      `VersionedMigration` and have custom logic for it, I added the same
      `try-runtime` functions to `UncheckedOnRuntimeUpgrade`. I looked for a
      ways to not duplicate functions, but couldn't find anything that doesn't
      significantly change the codebase. So I would appreciate If you have any
      suggestions to improve this
      
      cc @liamaharon
      
       @xlc 
      
      polkadot address: 16FqwPZ8GRC5U5D4Fu7W33nA55ZXzXGWHwmbnE1eT6pxuqcT
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarLiam Aharon <[email protected]>
      e5427969
    • Bastian Köcher's avatar
      Fix parachain upgrade scheduling when done by the owner/root (#3341) · 12eb285d
      Bastian Köcher authored
      When using `schedule_code_upgrade` to change the code of a parachain in
      the relay chain runtime, we had already fixed to not set the `GoAhead`
      signal. This was done to not brick any parachain after the upgrade,
      because they were seeing the signal without having any upgrade prepared.
      The remaining problem is that the parachain code is only upgraded after
      a parachain header was enacted, aka the parachain made some progress.
      However, this is quite complicated if the parachain is bricked (which is
      the most common scenario why to manually schedule a code upgrade). Thus,
      this pull request replaces `SetGoAhead` with `UpgradeStrategy` to signal
      to the logic kind of strategy want to use. The strategies are either
      `SetGoAheadSignal` or `ApplyAtExpectedBlock`. `SetGoAheadSignal` sets
      the go ahead signal as before and awaits a parachain block.
      `ApplyAtExpectedBlock` schedules the upgrade and applies it directly at
      the `expected_block` without waiting for the parachain to make any kind
      of progress.
      12eb285d
  6. Apr 01, 2024
  7. Mar 27, 2024
  8. Mar 26, 2024
    • Tsvetomir Dimitrov's avatar
      Migrate parachain swaps to Coretime (#3714) · 90234543
      Tsvetomir Dimitrov authored
      This PR notifies broker pallet for any parachain slot swaps performed on
      the relay chain. This is achieved by registering an `OnSwap` for the the
      `coretime` pallet. The hook sends XCM message to the broker chain and
      invokes a new extrinsic `swap_leases` which updates `Leases` storage
      item (which keeps the legacy parachain leases).
      
      I made two assumptions in this PR:
      1.
      [`Leases`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/4987d798/substrate/frame/broker/src/lib.rs#L120)
      in `broker` pallet and
      [`Leases`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/4987d798
      
      /polkadot/runtime/common/src/slots/mod.rs#L118)
      in `slots` pallet are in sync.
      2. `swap_leases` extrinsic from `broker` pallet can be triggered only by
      root or by the XCM message from the relay chain. If not - the extrinsic
      will generate an error and do nothing.
      
      As a side effect from the changes `OnSwap` trait is moved from
      runtime/common/traits.rs to runtime/parachains. Otherwise it is not
      accessible from `broker` pallet.
      
      Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3552
      
      TODOs:
      
      - [x] Weights
      - [x] Tests
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatareskimor <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      90234543
    • Dcompoze's avatar
      Fix spelling mistakes across the whole repository (#3808) · 002d9260
      Dcompoze authored
      **Update:** Pushed additional changes based on the review comments.
      
      **This pull request fixes various spelling mistakes in this
      repository.**
      
      Most of the changes are contained in the first **3** commits:
      
      - `Fix spelling mistakes in comments and docs`
      
      - `Fix spelling mistakes in test names`
      
      - `Fix spelling mistakes in error messages, panic messages, logs and
      tracing`
      
      Other source code spelling mistakes are separated into individual
      commits for easier reviewing:
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'authority'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'prev_enqueud_messages'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'endpoint'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'children'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSiblingSovereignAccount'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSudoAccount'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'insufficient'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'PalletXcmExtrinsicsBenchmark'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'subtracted'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'CandidatePendingAvailability'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'exclusive'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'until'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'discriminator'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'nonexistent'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'subsystem'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'indices'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'committed'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'topology'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'response'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'beneficiary'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'formatted'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'UNKNOWN_PROOF_REQUEST'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'succeeded'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'reopened'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'proposer'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'InstantiationNonce'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'depositor'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'expiration'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'phantom'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'AggregatedKeyValue'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'randomness'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'defendant'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'AquaticMammal'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'transactions'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'PassingTracingSubscriber'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'TxSignaturePayload'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'versioning'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'descendant'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'overridden'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'network'`
      
      Let me know if this structure is adequate.
      
      **Note:** The usage of the words `Merkle`, `Merkelize`, `Merklization`,
      `Merkelization`, `Merkleization`, is somewhat inconsistent but I left it
      as it is.
      
      ~~**Note:** In some places the term `Receival` is used to refer to
      message reception, IMO `Reception` is the correct word here, but I left
      it as it is.~~
      
      ~~**Note:** In some places the term `Overlayed` is used instead of the
      more acceptable version `Overlaid` but I also left it as it is.~~
      
      ~~**Note:** In some places the term `Applyable` is used instead of the
      correct version `Applicable` but I also left it as it is.~~
      
      **Note:** Some usage of British vs American english e.g. `judgement` vs
      `judgment`, `initialise` vs `initialize`, `optimise` vs `optimize` etc.
      are both present in different places, but I suppose that's
      understandable given the number of contributors.
      
      ~~**Note:** There is a spelling mistake in `.github/CODEOWNERS` but it
      triggers errors in CI when I make changes to it, so I left it as it
      is.~~
      002d9260
  9. Mar 21, 2024
    • Alin Dima's avatar
      Elastic scaling: runtime dependency tracking and enactment (#3479) · 4842faf6
      Alin Dima authored
      
      
      Changes needed to implement the runtime part of elastic scaling:
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3131,
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3132,
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3202
      
      Also fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3675
      
      TODOs:
      
      - [x] storage migration
      - [x] optimise process_candidates from O(N^2)
      - [x] drop backable candidates which form cycles
      - [x] fix unit tests
      - [x] add more unit tests
      - [x] check the runtime APIs which use the pending availability storage.
      We need to expose all of them, see
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3576
      - [x] optimise the candidate selection. we're currently picking randomly
      until we satisfy the weight limit. we need to be smart about not
      breaking candidate chains while being fair to all paras -
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3573
      
      Relies on the changes made in
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3233 in terms of the
      inclusion policy and the candidate ordering
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avataralindima <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatareskimor <[email protected]>
      4842faf6
  10. Mar 20, 2024
    • eskimor's avatar
      Fix algorithmic complexity of on-demand scheduler with regards to number of cores. (#3190) · b74353d3
      eskimor authored
      
      
      We witnessed really poor performance on Rococo, where we ended up with
      50 on-demand cores. This was due to the fact that for each core the full
      queue was processed. With this change full queue processing will happen
      way less often (most of the time complexity is O(1) or O(log(n))) and if
      it happens then only for one core (in expectation).
      
      Also spot price is now updated before each order to ensure economic back
      pressure.
      
      
      TODO:
      
      - [x] Implement
      - [x] Basic tests
      - [x] Add more tests (see todos)
      - [x] Run benchmark to confirm better performance, first results suggest
      > 100x faster.
      - [x] Write migrations
      - [x] Bump scale-info version and remove patch in Cargo.toml
      - [x] Write PR docs: on-demand performance improved, more on-demand
      cores are now non problematic anymore. If need by also the max queue
      size can be increased again. (Maybe not to 10k)
      
      Optional: Performance can be improved even more, if we called
      `pop_assignment_for_core()`, before calling `report_processed` (Avoid
      needless affinity drops). The effect gets smaller the larger the claim
      queue and I would only go for it, if it does not add complexity to the
      scheduler.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatareskimor <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarantonva <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAnton Vilhelm Ásgeirsson <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarordian <[email protected]>
      b74353d3
    • Tsvetomir Dimitrov's avatar
      Expose `ClaimQueue` via a runtime api and use it in `collation-generation` (#3580) · e58e854a
      Tsvetomir Dimitrov authored
      The PR adds two things:
      1. Runtime API exposing the whole claim queue
      2. Consumes the API in `collation-generation` to fetch the next
      scheduled `ParaEntry` for an occupied core.
      
      Related to https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1797
      e58e854a
  11. Mar 19, 2024
    • Davide Galassi's avatar
      Implement crypto byte array newtypes in term of a shared type (#3684) · 1e9fd237
      Davide Galassi authored
      Introduces `CryptoBytes` type defined as:
      
      ```rust
      pub struct CryptoBytes<const N: usize, Tag = ()>(pub [u8; N], PhantomData<fn() -> Tag>);
      ```
      
      The type implements a bunch of methods and traits which are typically
      expected from a byte array newtype
      (NOTE: some of the methods and trait implementations IMO are a bit
      redundant, but I decided to maintain them all to not change too much
      stuff in this PR)
      
      It also introduces two (generic) typical consumers of `CryptoBytes`:
      `PublicBytes` and `SignatureBytes`.
      
      ```rust
      pub struct PublicTag;
      pub PublicBytes<const N: usize, CryptoTag> = CryptoBytes<N, (PublicTag, CryptoTag)>;
      
      pub struct SignatureTag;
      pub SignatureBytes<const N: usize, CryptoTag> = CryptoBytes<N, (SignatureTag, CryptoTag)>;
      ```
      
      Both of them use a tag to differentiate the two types at a higher level.
      Downstream specializations will further specialize using a dedicated
      crypto tag. For example in ECDSA:
      
      
      ```rust
      pub struct EcdsaTag;
      
      pub type Public = PublicBytes<PUBLIC_KEY_SERIALIZED_SIZE, EcdsaTag>;
      pub type Signature = PublicBytes<PUBLIC_KEY_SERIALIZED_SIZE, EcdsaTag>;
      ```
      
      Overall we have a cleaner and most importantly **consistent** code for
      all the types involved
      
      All these details are opaque to the end user which can use `Public` and
      `Signature` for the cryptos as before
      1e9fd237
  12. Mar 15, 2024
  13. Mar 11, 2024
  14. Mar 08, 2024
  15. Mar 07, 2024
    • Pablo Andrés Dorado Suárez's avatar
      fix(pallet-benchmarking): split test functions in v2 (#3574) · f4fbddec
      Pablo Andrés Dorado Suárez authored
      Closes #376
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      f4fbddec
    • Andrei Sandu's avatar
      ParaInherent create: update `apply_weight_limit` wrt elastic scaling (#3573) · c16fcc47
      Andrei Sandu authored
      
      
      Changes the way we perform the random selection of backed candidates
      when there isn't enough room for all of them. Instead of picking
      individual backed candidates `apply_weight` now operates on chains of
      candidates. This is fully backwards compatible and relies on the node
      side (provisioner/prospective parachains) doing the heavy lifting and
      providing the candidates in the order they form a chain.
      
      The same approach can be implemented for bitfields random selection once
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3479 is merged.
      
      The approach taken in this PR aims for reduced additional complexity at
      the cost of being less fair wrt how many backed candidates from each
      chain are picked. It favors elastic scaling parachains vs parachains not
      using elastic scaling, but from my perspective it should be fine as this
      should happen under exceptional circumstances like dispute storms.
      
      Note: to make things more fair we can consider specializing `random_sel`
      such that it will try to pick candidates one by one in the order
      provided by the provisioner such that non elastic scaling parachains
      have the same chance of getting a candidate backed.
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
      c16fcc47
  16. Feb 29, 2024
  17. Feb 28, 2024
    • Liam Aharon's avatar
      Runtime Upgrade ref docs and Single Block Migration example pallet (#1554) · 12ce4f7d
      Liam Aharon authored
      Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/55
      
      - Changes 'current storage version' terminology to less ambiguous
      'in-code storage version' (suggestion by @ggwpez
      
      )
      - Adds a new example pallet `pallet-example-single-block-migrations`
      - Adds a new reference doc to replace
      https://docs.substrate.io/maintain/runtime-upgrades/ (temporarily living
      in the pallet while we wait for developer hub PR to merge)
      - Adds documentation for the `storage_alias` macro
      - Improves `trait Hooks` docs 
      - Improves `trait GetStorageVersion` docs
      - Update the suggested patterns for using `VersionedMigration`, so that
      version unchecked migrations are never exported
      - Prevents accidental usage of version unchecked migrations in runtimes
      
      https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/14421#discussion_r1255467895
      - Unversioned migration code is kept inside `mod version_unchecked`,
      versioned code is kept in `pub mod versioned`
      - It is necessary to use modules to limit visibility because the inner
      migration must be `pub`. See
      https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/30905 and
      
      https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/lang-team-minutes-private-in-public-rules/4504/40
      for more.
      
      ### todo
      
      - [x] move to reference docs to proper place within sdk-docs (now that
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2102 is merged)
      - [x] prdoc
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarKian Paimani <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJuan <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatargupnik <[email protected]>
      12ce4f7d
  18. Feb 23, 2024
    • Andrei Sandu's avatar
      Runtime: allow backing multiple candidates of same parachain on different cores (#3231) · 2431001e
      Andrei Sandu authored
      
      
      Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3144
      
      Builds on top of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3229
      
      ### Summary
      Some preparations for Runtime to support elastic scaling, guarded by
      config node features bit `FeatureIndex::ElasticScalingMVP`. This PR
      introduces a per-candidate `CoreIndex` but does it in a hacky way to
      avoid changing `CandidateCommitments`, `CandidateReceipts` primitives
      and networking protocols.
      
      #### Including `CoreIndex` in `BackedCandidate`
      If the `ElasticScalingMVP` feature bit is enabled then
      `BackedCandidate::validator_indices` is extended by 8 bits.
      The value stored in these bits represents the assumed core index for the
      candidate.
      
      It is temporary solution which works by creating a mapping from
      `BackedCandidate` to `CoreIndex` by assuming the `CoreIndex` can be
      discovered by checking in which validator group the validator that
      signed the statement is.
      
      TODO:
      - [x] fix tests
      - [x] add new tests
      - [x] Bump runtime API for Kusama, so we have that node features thing!
      -> https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/194
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
      Signed-off-by: default avataralindima <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avataralindima <[email protected]>
      2431001e
  19. Feb 14, 2024
  20. Feb 02, 2024
  21. Jan 31, 2024
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      [frame] `#[pallet::composite_enum]` improved variant count handling + removed... · bb8ddc46
      Branislav Kontur authored
      [frame] `#[pallet::composite_enum]` improved variant count handling + removed `pallet_balances`'s `MaxHolds` config (#2657)
      
      I started this investigation/issue based on @liamaharon
      
       question
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1801#discussion_r1410452499).
      
      ## Problem
      
      The `pallet_balances` integrity test should correctly detect that the
      runtime has correct distinct `HoldReasons` variant count. I assume the
      same situation exists for RuntimeFreezeReason.
      
      It is not a critical problem, if we set `MaxHolds` with a sufficiently
      large value, everything should be ok. However, in this case, the
      integrity_test check becomes less useful.
      
      **Situation for "any" runtime:**
      - `HoldReason` enums from different pallets:
      ```rust
              /// from pallet_nis
              #[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason {
      		NftReceipt,
      	}
      
              /// from pallet_preimage
              #[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason {
      		Preimage,
      	}
      
              // from pallet_state-trie-migration
              #[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason {
      		SlashForContinueMigrate,
      		SlashForMigrateCustomTop,
      		SlashForMigrateCustomChild,
      	}
      ```
      
      - generated `RuntimeHoldReason` enum looks like:
      ```rust
      pub enum RuntimeHoldReason {
      
          #[codec(index = 32u8)]
          Preimage(pallet_preimage::HoldReason),
      
          #[codec(index = 38u8)]
          Nis(pallet_nis::HoldReason),
      
          #[codec(index = 42u8)]
          StateTrieMigration(pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason),
      }
      ```
      
      - composite enum `RuntimeHoldReason` variant count is detected as `3`
      - we set `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>`
      - `pallet_balances::integrity_test` is ok with `3`(at least 3)
      
      However, the real problem can occur in a live runtime where some
      functionality might stop working. This is due to a total of 5 distinct
      hold reasons (for pallets with multi-instance support, it is even more),
      and not all of them can be used because of an incorrect `MaxHolds`,
      which is deemed acceptable according to the `integrity_test`:
        ```
        // pseudo-code - if we try to call all of these:
      
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_nis::HoldReason::NftReceipt.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_preimage::HoldReason::Preimage.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
      
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForContinueMigrate.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
      
        // With `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>` these two will fail
      
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomTop.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
      
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomChild.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
        ```  
      
      
      ## Solutions
      
      A macro `#[pallet::*]` expansion is extended of `VariantCount`
      implementation for the `#[pallet::composite_enum]` enum type. This
      expansion generates the `VariantCount` implementation for pallets'
      `HoldReason`, `FreezeReason`, `LockId`, and `SlashReason`. Enum variants
      must be plain enum values without fields to ensure a deterministic
      count.
      
      The composite runtime enum, `RuntimeHoldReason` and
      `RuntimeFreezeReason`, now sets `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT` as the sum
      of pallets' enum `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT`:
      ```rust
      #[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)]
      mod module_single_instance {
      
      	#[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason {
      		ModuleSingleInstanceReason1,
      		ModuleSingleInstanceReason2,
      	}
      ...
      }
      
      #[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)]
      mod module_multi_instance {
      
      	#[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason<I: 'static = ()> {
      		ModuleMultiInstanceReason1,
      		ModuleMultiInstanceReason2,
      		ModuleMultiInstanceReason3,
      	}
      ...
      }
      
      
      impl self::sp_api_hidden_includes_construct_runtime::hidden_include::traits::VariantCount
          for RuntimeHoldReason
      {
          const VARIANT_COUNT: u32 = 0
              + module_single_instance::HoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT
              + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance1>::VARIANT_COUNT
              + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance2>::VARIANT_COUNT
              + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance3>::VARIANT_COUNT;
      }
      ```
      
      In addition, `MaxHolds` is removed (as suggested
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2657#discussion_r1443324573))
      from `pallet_balances`, and its `Holds` are now bounded to
      `RuntimeHoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT`. Therefore, there is no need to let
      the runtime specify `MaxHolds`.
      
      
      ## For reviewers
      
      Relevant changes can be found here:
      - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/lib.rs` 
      -  `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/parse/composite.rs`
      -  `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/expand/composite.rs`
      -
      `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/composite_helper.rs`
      -
      `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/hold_reason.rs`
      -
      `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/freeze_reason.rs`
      - `substrate/frame/support/src/traits/misc.rs`
      
      And the rest of the files is just about removed `MaxHolds` from
      `pallet_balances`
      
      ## Next steps
      
      Do the same for `MaxFreezes`
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2997.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDónal Murray <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatargupnik <[email protected]>
      bb8ddc46
  22. Jan 22, 2024
    • Davide Galassi's avatar
      Move cryptographic hashing procedures to crypto folder. (#2306) · 4c10fd2a
      Davide Galassi authored
      
      
      Step towards https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1975
      
      As reported
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1975#issuecomment-1774534225
      I'd like to encapsulate crypto related stuff in a dedicated folder.
      
      Currently all cryptographic primitive wrappers are all sparsed in
      `substrate/core` which contains "misc core" stuff.
      
      To simplify the process, as the first step with this PR I propose to
      move the cryptographic hashing there.
      
      The `substrate/crypto` folder was already created to contains `ec-utils`
      crate.
      
      Notes:
      - rename `sp-core-hashing` to `sp-crypto-hashing`
      - rename `sp-core-hashing-proc-macro` to `sp-crypto-hashing-proc-macro`
      - As the crates name is changed I took the freedom to restart fresh from
      version 0.1.0 for both crates
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarRobert Hambrock <[email protected]>
      4c10fd2a
  23. Jan 18, 2024
  24. Jan 16, 2024
    • Francisco Aguirre's avatar
      XCMv4 (#1230) · 8428f678
      Francisco Aguirre authored
      
      
      # Note for reviewer
      
      Most changes are just syntax changes necessary for the new version.
      Most important files should be the ones under the `xcm` folder.
      
      # Description 
      
      Added XCMv4.
      
      ## Removed `Multi` prefix
      The following types have been renamed:
      - MultiLocation -> Location
      - MultiAsset -> Asset
      - MultiAssets -> Assets
      - InteriorMultiLocation -> InteriorLocation
      - MultiAssetFilter -> AssetFilter
      - VersionedMultiAsset -> VersionedAsset
      - WildMultiAsset -> WildAsset
      - VersionedMultiLocation -> VersionedLocation
      
      In order to fix a name conflict, the `Assets` in `xcm-executor` were
      renamed to `HoldingAssets`, as they represent assets in holding.
      
      ## Removed `Abstract` asset id
      
      It was not being used anywhere and this simplifies the code.
      
      Now assets are just constructed as follows:
      
      ```rust
      let asset: Asset = (AssetId(Location::new(1, Here)), 100u128).into();
      ```
      
      No need for specifying `Concrete` anymore.
      
      ## Outcome is now a named fields struct
      
      Instead of
      
      ```rust
      pub enum Outcome {
        Complete(Weight),
        Incomplete(Weight, Error),
        Error(Error),
      }
      ```
      
      we now have
      
      ```rust
      pub enum Outcome {
        Complete { used: Weight },
        Incomplete { used: Weight, error: Error },
        Error { error: Error },
      }
      ```
      
      ## Added Reanchorable trait
      
      Now both locations and assets implement this trait, making it easier to
      reanchor both.
      
      ## New syntax for building locations and junctions
      
      Now junctions are built using the following methods:
      
      ```rust
      let location = Location {
          parents: 1,
          interior: [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)].into()
      };
      ```
      
      or
      
      ```rust
      let location = Location::new(1, [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)]);
      ```
      
      And they are matched like so:
      
      ```rust
      match location.unpack() {
        (1, [Parachain(id)]) => ...
        (0, Here) => ...,
        (1, [_]) => ...,
      }
      ```
      
      This syntax is mandatory in v4, and has been also implemented for v2 and
      v3 for easier migration.
      
      This was needed to make all sizes smaller.
      
      # TODO
      - [x] Scaffold v4
      - [x] Port github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7236
      - [x] Remove `Multi` prefix
      - [x] Remove `Abstract` asset id
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarKeith Yeung <[email protected]>
      8428f678
  25. Jan 12, 2024
    • joe petrowski's avatar
      Add More HRMP Channel Opening Tests (#2915) · f7306d32
      joe petrowski authored
      A recent referendum failed because the parachain's sovereign account had
      enough funds for the deposit (the runtime at the time required a
      deposit) but not enough left over for the existential deposit, which
      must remain free.
      
      The current logic does not require a deposit for channels with system
      chains, and the current tests check that none is taken. This new test
      simply ensures that even without any balance in a parachain's sovereign
      account, opening a channel with a system chain will be successful.
      f7306d32
  26. Jan 11, 2024
  27. Jan 08, 2024
  28. Dec 27, 2023
  29. Dec 22, 2023
  30. Dec 21, 2023
  31. Dec 20, 2023
    • Dónal Murray's avatar
      Fix clippy lints behind feature gates and add new CI step all features (#2569) · d68868f6
      Dónal Murray authored
      
      
      Many clippy lints usually enforced by `-Dcomplexity` and `-Dcorrectness`
      are not caught by CI as they are gated by `features`, like
      `runtime-benchmarks`, while the clippy CI job runs with only the default
      features for all targets.
      
      This PR also adds a CI step to run clippy with `--all-features` to
      ensure the code quality is maintained behind feature gates from now on.
      
      To improve local development, clippy lints are downgraded to warnings,
      but they still will result in an error at CI due to the `-Dwarnings`
      rustflag.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarLiam Aharon <[email protected]>
      d68868f6