- Mar 26, 2024
-
-
Dcompoze authored
**Update:** Pushed additional changes based on the review comments. **This pull request fixes various spelling mistakes in this repository.** Most of the changes are contained in the first **3** commits: - `Fix spelling mistakes in comments and docs` - `Fix spelling mistakes in test names` - `Fix spelling mistakes in error messages, panic messages, logs and tracing` Other source code spelling mistakes are separated into individual commits for easier reviewing: - `Fix the spelling of 'authority'` - `Fix the spelling of 'REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY'` - `Fix the spelling of 'prev_enqueud_messages'` - `Fix the spelling of 'endpoint'` - `Fix the spelling of 'children'` - `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSiblingSovereignAccount'` - `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSudoAccount'` - `Fix the spelling of 'insufficient'` - `Fix the spelling of 'PalletXcmExtrinsicsBenchmark'` - `Fix the spelling of 'subtracted'` - `Fix the spelling of 'CandidatePendingAvailability'` - `Fix the spelling of 'exclusive'` - `Fix the spelling of 'until'` - `Fix the spelling of 'discriminator'` - `Fix the spelling of 'nonexistent'` - `Fix the spelling of 'subsystem'` - `Fix the spelling of 'indices'` - `Fix the spelling of 'committed'` - `Fix the spelling of 'topology'` - `Fix the spelling of 'response'` - `Fix the spelling of 'beneficiary'` - `Fix the spelling of 'formatted'` - `Fix the spelling of 'UNKNOWN_PROOF_REQUEST'` - `Fix the spelling of 'succeeded'` - `Fix the spelling of 'reopened'` - `Fix the spelling of 'proposer'` - `Fix the spelling of 'InstantiationNonce'` - `Fix the spelling of 'depositor'` - `Fix the spelling of 'expiration'` - `Fix the spelling of 'phantom'` - `Fix the spelling of 'AggregatedKeyValue'` - `Fix the spelling of 'randomness'` - `Fix the spelling of 'defendant'` - `Fix the spelling of 'AquaticMammal'` - `Fix the spelling of 'transactions'` - `Fix the spelling of 'PassingTracingSubscriber'` - `Fix the spelling of 'TxSignaturePayload'` - `Fix the spelling of 'versioning'` - `Fix the spelling of 'descendant'` - `Fix the spelling of 'overridden'` - `Fix the spelling of 'network'` Let me know if this structure is adequate. **Note:** The usage of the words `Merkle`, `Merkelize`, `Merklization`, `Merkelization`, `Merkleization`, is somewhat inconsistent but I left it as it is. ~~**Note:** In some places the term `Receival` is used to refer to message reception, IMO `Reception` is the correct word here, but I left it as it is.~~ ~~**Note:** In some places the term `Overlayed` is used instead of the more acceptable version `Overlaid` but I also left it as it is.~~ ~~**Note:** In some places the term `Applyable` is used instead of the correct version `Applicable` but I also left it as it is.~~ **Note:** Some usage of British vs American english e.g. `judgement` vs `judgment`, `initialise` vs `initialize`, `optimise` vs `optimize` etc. are both present in different places, but I suppose that's understandable given the number of contributors. ~~**Note:** There is a spelling mistake in `.github/CODEOWNERS` but it triggers errors in CI when I make changes to it, so I left it as it is.~~
-
- Mar 15, 2024
-
-
gupnik authored
Step in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/171 This PR removes `as [disambiguation_path]` syntax from `derive_impl` usage across the polkadot-sdk as introduced in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3505
-
- Mar 13, 2024
-
-
georgepisaltu authored
Revert "FRAME: Create `TransactionExtension` as a replacement for `SignedExtension` (#2280)" (#3665) This PR reverts #2280 which introduced `TransactionExtension` to replace `SignedExtension`. As a result of the discussion [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3623#issuecomment-1986789700), the changes will be reverted for now with plans to reintroduce the concept in the future. --------- Signed-off-by:georgepisaltu <[email protected]>
-
- Mar 04, 2024
-
-
Gavin Wood authored
Closes #2160 First part of [Extrinsic Horizon](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2415) Introduces a new trait `TransactionExtension` to replace `SignedExtension`. Introduce the idea of transactions which obey the runtime's extensions and have according Extension data (né Extra data) yet do not have hard-coded signatures. Deprecate the terminology of "Unsigned" when used for transactions/extrinsics owing to there now being "proper" unsigned transactions which obey the extension framework and "old-style" unsigned which do not. Instead we have __*General*__ for the former and __*Bare*__ for the latter. (Ultimately, the latter will be phased out as a type of transaction, and Bare will only be used for Inherents.) Types of extrinsic are now therefore: - Bare (no hardcoded signature, no Extra data; used to be known as "Unsigned") - Bare transactions (deprecated): Gossiped, validated with `ValidateUnsigned` (deprecated) and the `_bare_compat` bits of `TransactionExtension` (deprecated). - Inherents: Not gossiped, validated with `ProvideInherent`. - Extended (Extra data): Gossiped, validated via `TransactionExtension`. - Signed transactions (with a hardcoded signature). - General transactions (without a hardcoded signature). `TransactionExtension` differs from `SignedExtension` because: - A signature on the underlying transaction may validly not be present. - It may alter the origin during validation. - `pre_dispatch` is renamed to `prepare` and need not contain the checks present in `validate`. - `validate` and `prepare` is passed an `Origin` rather than a `AccountId`. - `validate` may pass arbitrary information into `prepare` via a new user-specifiable type `Val`. - `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to `Implicit`/`implicit`. It is encoded *for the entire transaction* and passed in to each extension as a new argument to `validate`. This facilitates the ability of extensions to acts as underlying crypto. There is a new `DispatchTransaction` trait which contains only default function impls and is impl'ed for any `TransactionExtension` impler. It provides several utility functions which reduce some of the tedium from using `TransactionExtension` (indeed, none of its regular functions should now need to be called directly). Three transaction version discriminator ("versions") are now permissible: - 0b000000100: Bare (used to be called "Unsigned"): contains Signature or Extra (extension data). After bare transactions are no longer supported, this will strictly identify an Inherents only. - 0b100000100: Old-school "Signed" Transaction: contains Signature and Extra (extension data). - 0b010000100: New-school "General" Transaction: contains Extra (extension data), but no Signature. For the New-school General Transaction, it becomes trivial for authors to publish extensions to the mechanism for authorizing an Origin, e.g. through new kinds of key-signing schemes, ZK proofs, pallet state, mutations over pre-authenticated origins or any combination of the above. ## Code Migration ### NOW: Getting it to build Wrap your `SignedExtension`s in `AsTransactionExtension`. This should be accompanied by renaming your aggregate type in line with the new terminology. E.g. Before: ```rust /// The SignedExtension to the basic transaction logic. pub type SignedExtra = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension, ); /// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime. pub type UncheckedExtrinsic = generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, SignedExtra>; ``` After: ```rust /// The extension to the basic transaction logic. pub type TxExtension = ( /* snip */ AsTransactionExtension<MySpecialSignedExtension>, ); /// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime. pub type UncheckedExtrinsic = generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, TxExtension>; ``` You'll also need to alter any transaction building logic to add a `.into()` to make the conversion happen. E.g. Before: ```rust fn construct_extrinsic( /* snip */ ) -> UncheckedExtrinsic { let extra: SignedExtra = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */), ); let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), extra.clone()).unwrap(); let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e)); UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed( /* snip */ Signature::Sr25519(signature), extra, ) } ``` After: ```rust fn construct_extrinsic( /* snip */ ) -> UncheckedExtrinsic { let tx_ext: TxExtension = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */).into(), ); let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), tx_ext.clone()).unwrap(); let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e)); UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed( /* snip */ Signature::Sr25519(signature), tx_ext, ) } ``` ### SOON: Migrating to `TransactionExtension` Most `SignedExtension`s can be trivially converted to become a `TransactionExtension`. There are a few things to know. - Instead of a single trait like `SignedExtension`, you should now implement two traits individually: `TransactionExtensionBase` and `TransactionExtension`. - Weights are now a thing and must be provided via the new function `fn weight`. #### `TransactionExtensionBase` This trait takes care of anything which is not dependent on types specific to your runtime, most notably `Call`. - `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to `Implicit`/`implicit`. - Weight must be returned by implementing the `weight` function. If your extension is associated with a pallet, you'll probably want to do this via the pallet's existing benchmarking infrastructure. #### `TransactionExtension` Generally: - `pre_dispatch` is now `prepare` and you *should not reexecute the `validate` functionality in there*! - You don't get an account ID any more; you get an origin instead. If you need to presume an account ID, then you can use the trait function `AsSystemOriginSigner::as_system_origin_signer`. - You get an additional ticket, similar to `Pre`, called `Val`. This defines data which is passed from `validate` into `prepare`. This is important since you should not be duplicating logic from `validate` to `prepare`, you need a way of passing your working from the former into the latter. This is it. - This trait takes two type parameters: `Call` and `Context`. `Call` is the runtime call type which used to be an associated type; you can just move it to become a type parameter for your trait impl. `Context` is not currently used and you can safely implement over it as an unbounded type. - There's no `AccountId` associated type any more. Just remove it. Regarding `validate`: - You get three new parameters in `validate`; all can be ignored when migrating from `SignedExtension`. - `validate` returns a tuple on success; the second item in the tuple is the new ticket type `Self::Val` which gets passed in to `prepare`. If you use any information extracted during `validate` (off-chain and on-chain, non-mutating) in `prepare` (on-chain, mutating) then you can pass it through with this. For the tuple's last item, just return the `origin` argument. Regarding `prepare`: - This is renamed from `pre_dispatch`, but there is one change: - FUNCTIONALITY TO VALIDATE THE TRANSACTION NEED NOT BE DUPLICATED FROM `validate`!! - (This is different to `SignedExtension` which was required to run the same checks in `pre_dispatch` as in `validate`.) Regarding `post_dispatch`: - Since there are no unsigned transactions handled by `TransactionExtension`, `Pre` is always defined, so the first parameter is `Self::Pre` rather than `Option<Self::Pre>`. If you make use of `SignedExtension::validate_unsigned` or `SignedExtension::pre_dispatch_unsigned`, then: - Just use the regular versions of these functions instead. - Have your logic execute in the case that the `origin` is `None`. - Ensure your transaction creation logic creates a General Transaction rather than a Bare Transaction; this means having to include all `TransactionExtension`s' data. - `ValidateUnsigned` can still be used (for now) if you need to be able to construct transactions which contain none of the extension data, however these will be phased out in stage 2 of the Transactions Horizon, so you should consider moving to an extension-centric design. ## TODO - [x] Introduce `CheckSignature` impl of `TransactionExtension` to ensure it's possible to have crypto be done wholly in a `TransactionExtension`. - [x] Deprecate `SignedExtension` and move all uses in codebase to `TransactionExtension`. - [x] `ChargeTransactionPayment` - [x] `DummyExtension` - [x] `ChargeAssetTxPayment` (asset-tx-payment) - [x] `ChargeAssetTxPayment` (asset-conversion-tx-payment) - [x] `CheckWeight` - [x] `CheckTxVersion` - [x] `CheckSpecVersion` - [x] `CheckNonce` - [x] `CheckNonZeroSender` - [x] `CheckMortality` - [x] `CheckGenesis` - [x] `CheckOnlySudoAccount` - [x] `WatchDummy` - [x] `PrevalidateAttests` - [x] `GenericSignedExtension` - [x] `SignedExtension` (chain-polkadot-bulletin) - [x] `RefundSignedExtensionAdapter` - [x] Implement `fn weight` across the board. - [ ] Go through all pre-existing extensions which assume an account signer and explicitly handle the possibility of another kind of origin. - [x] `CheckNonce` should probably succeed in the case of a non-account origin. - [x] `CheckNonZeroSender` should succeed in the case of a non-account origin. - [x] `ChargeTransactionPayment` and family should fail in the case of a non-account origin. - [ ] - [x] Fix any broken tests. --------- Signed-off-by:Alexandru Vasile <[email protected]> Signed-off-by:
dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Signed-off-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by:
Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]> Signed-off-by:
Andrei Sandu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Nikhil Gupta <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
georgepisaltu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Chevdor <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Maciej <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Javier Viola <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Marcin S. <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Tsvetomir Dimitrov <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Javier Bullrich <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Koute <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Vladimir Istyufeev <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ross Bulat <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Gonçalo Pestana <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Liam Aharon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Svyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
André Silva <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
s0me0ne-unkn0wn <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
ordian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Sebastian Kunert <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Aaro Altonen <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Dmitry Markin <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Alexandru Vasile <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Alexander Samusev <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Julian Eager <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Michal Kucharczyk <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Davide Galassi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Dónal Murray <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
yjh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Tom Mi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
Will | Paradox | ParaNodes.io <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Joshy Orndorff <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Joshy Orndorff <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
PG Herveou <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Alexander Theißen <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Kian Paimani <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Juan Girini <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
bader y <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
James Wilson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
joe petrowski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
asynchronous rob <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Parth <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Andrew Jones <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Jonathan Udd <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Serban Iorga <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Egor_P <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Evgeny Snitko <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Just van Stam <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
gupnik <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
dzmitry-lahoda <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
zhiqiangxu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Nazar Mokrynskyi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Anwesh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
cheme <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Sam Johnson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
kianenigma <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Jegor Sidorenko <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Muharem <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
joepetrowski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Gabriel Facco de Arruda <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Squirrel <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Andrei Sandu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
-
- Feb 28, 2024
-
-
Liam Aharon authoredCloses https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/55 - Changes 'current storage version' terminology to less ambiguous 'in-code storage version' (suggestion by @ggwpez ) - Adds a new example pallet `pallet-example-single-block-migrations` - Adds a new reference doc to replace https://docs.substrate.io/maintain/runtime-upgrades/ (temporarily living in the pallet while we wait for developer hub PR to merge) - Adds documentation for the `storage_alias` macro - Improves `trait Hooks` docs - Improves `trait GetStorageVersion` docs - Update the suggested patterns for using `VersionedMigration`, so that version unchecked migrations are never exported - Prevents accidental usage of version unchecked migrations in runtimes https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/14421#discussion_r1255467895 - Unversioned migration code is kept inside `mod version_unchecked`, versioned code is kept in `pub mod versioned` - It is necessary to use modules to limit visibility because the inner migration must be `pub`. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/30905 and https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/lang-team-minutes-private-in-public-rules/4504/40 for more. ### todo - [x] move to reference docs to proper place within sdk-docs (now that https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2102 is merged) - [x] prdoc --------- Co-authored-by:
-
- Feb 12, 2024
-
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authoredChanges (partial https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/994): - Set log to `0.4.20` everywhere - Lift `log` to the workspace Starting with a simpler one after seeing https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2065 from @jsdw . This sets the `default-features` to `false` in the root and then overwrites that in each create to its original value. This is necessary since otherwise the `default` features are additive and its impossible to disable them in the crate again once they are enabled in the workspace. I am using a tool to do this, so its mostly a test to see that it works as expected. --------- Signed-off-by:
-
- Feb 08, 2024
-
-
Gonçalo Pestana authored
The `TotalLockedValue` storage value in nomination pools pallet may get out of sync if the staking pallet does implicit withdrawal of unlocking chunks belonging to a bonded pool stash. This fix is based on a new method in the `OnStakingUpdate` traits, `on_withdraw`, which allows the nomination pools pallet to adjust the `TotalLockedValue` every time there is an implicit or explicit withdrawal from a bonded pool's stash. This PR also adds a migration that checks and updates the on-chain TVL if it got out of sync due to the bug this PR fixes. **Changes to `trait OnStakingUpdate`** In order for staking to notify the nomination pools pallet that chunks where withdrew, we add a new method, `on_withdraw` to the `OnStakingUpdate` trait. The nomination pools pallet filters the withdraws that are related to bonded pool accounts and updates the `TotalValueLocked` accordingly. **Others** - Adds try-state checks to the EPM/staking e2e tests - Adds tests for auto withdrawing in the context of nomination pools **To-do** - [x] check if we need a migration to fix the current `TotalValueLocked` (run try-runtime) - [x] migrations to fix the current on-chain TVL value
✅ **Kusama**: ``` TotalValueLocked: 99.4559 kKSM TotalValueLocked (calculated) 99.4559 kKSM ```⚠ ️ **Westend**: ``` TotalValueLocked: 18.4060 kWND TotalValueLocked (calculated) 18.4050 kWND ``` **Polkadot**: TVL not released yet. Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3055 --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
-
- Feb 06, 2024
-
-
Squirrel authored
First in a series of PRs that reduces our use of sp-std with a view to deprecating it. This is just looking at /substrate and moving some of the references from `sp-std` to `core`. These particular changes should be uncontroversial. Where macros are used `::core` should be used to remove any ambiguity. part of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2101
-
- Jan 31, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
[frame] `#[pallet::composite_enum]` improved variant count handling + removed `pallet_balances`'s `MaxHolds` config (#2657) I started this investigation/issue based on @liamaharon question [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1801#discussion_r1410452499). ## Problem The `pallet_balances` integrity test should correctly detect that the runtime has correct distinct `HoldReasons` variant count. I assume the same situation exists for RuntimeFreezeReason. It is not a critical problem, if we set `MaxHolds` with a sufficiently large value, everything should be ok. However, in this case, the integrity_test check becomes less useful. **Situation for "any" runtime:** - `HoldReason` enums from different pallets: ```rust /// from pallet_nis #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason { NftReceipt, } /// from pallet_preimage #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason { Preimage, } // from pallet_state-trie-migration #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason { SlashForContinueMigrate, SlashForMigrateCustomTop, SlashForMigrateCustomChild, } ``` - generated `RuntimeHoldReason` enum looks like: ```rust pub enum RuntimeHoldReason { #[codec(index = 32u8)] Preimage(pallet_preimage::HoldReason), #[codec(index = 38u8)] Nis(pallet_nis::HoldReason), #[codec(index = 42u8)] StateTrieMigration(pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason), } ``` - composite enum `RuntimeHoldReason` variant count is detected as `3` - we set `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>` - `pallet_balances::integrity_test` is ok with `3`(at least 3) However, the real problem can occur in a live runtime where some functionality might stop working. This is due to a total of 5 distinct hold reasons (for pallets with multi-instance support, it is even more), and not all of them can be used because of an incorrect `MaxHolds`, which is deemed acceptable according to the `integrity_test`: ``` // pseudo-code - if we try to call all of these: T::Currency::hold(&pallet_nis::HoldReason::NftReceipt.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; T::Currency::hold(&pallet_preimage::HoldReason::Preimage.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForContinueMigrate.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; // With `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>` these two will fail T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomTop.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomChild.into(), &nft_owner, deposit)?; ``` ## Solutions A macro `#[pallet::*]` expansion is extended of `VariantCount` implementation for the `#[pallet::composite_enum]` enum type. This expansion generates the `VariantCount` implementation for pallets' `HoldReason`, `FreezeReason`, `LockId`, and `SlashReason`. Enum variants must be plain enum values without fields to ensure a deterministic count. The composite runtime enum, `RuntimeHoldReason` and `RuntimeFreezeReason`, now sets `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT` as the sum of pallets' enum `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT`: ```rust #[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)] mod module_single_instance { #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason { ModuleSingleInstanceReason1, ModuleSingleInstanceReason2, } ... } #[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)] mod module_multi_instance { #[pallet::composite_enum] pub enum HoldReason<I: 'static = ()> { ModuleMultiInstanceReason1, ModuleMultiInstanceReason2, ModuleMultiInstanceReason3, } ... } impl self::sp_api_hidden_includes_construct_runtime::hidden_include::traits::VariantCount for RuntimeHoldReason { const VARIANT_COUNT: u32 = 0 + module_single_instance::HoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance1>::VARIANT_COUNT + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance2>::VARIANT_COUNT + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance3>::VARIANT_COUNT; } ``` In addition, `MaxHolds` is removed (as suggested [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2657#discussion_r1443324573)) from `pallet_balances`, and its `Holds` are now bounded to `RuntimeHoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT`. Therefore, there is no need to let the runtime specify `MaxHolds`. ## For reviewers Relevant changes can be found here: - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/lib.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/parse/composite.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/expand/composite.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/composite_helper.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/hold_reason.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/freeze_reason.rs` - `substrate/frame/support/src/traits/misc.rs` And the rest of the files is just about removed `MaxHolds` from `pallet_balances` ## Next steps Do the same for `MaxFreezes` https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2997. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
-
- Jan 26, 2024
-
-
Liam Aharon authored
Related https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3032 --- Using https://github.com/liamaharon/cargo-workspace-version-tools/ `cargo run -- sync --path ../polkadot-sdk` --------- Signed-off-by:
-
- Jan 22, 2024
-
-
Nikos Kontakis authored
This PR wraps the `Snapshot`, `SnapshotMetadata` and `DesiredTargets` storage items in the [EPM pallet](https://paritytech.github.io/substrate/master/pallet_election_provider_multi_phase/index.html) in order to keep them in sync throughout the election lifetime and in order to be killed together. Prior to this PR, these storage items were mutated in different places in the pallet; In addition 2 helper `fns` are introduced for chekcing if all the wrapped storage items exist or not; Fixes #413 ; --------- Co-authored-by:
-
joe petrowski authored
Clean up all the old syntax. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
Maksym H <[email protected]>
-
- Dec 18, 2023
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
This PR contains just a few clippy fixes and nits, which are, however, relaxed by workspace clippy settings here: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/Cargo.toml#L483-L506 --------- Co-authored-by:
Dmitry Sinyavin <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
-
- Dec 15, 2023
-
-
Ankan authored
closes https://github.com/paritytech-secops/srlabs_findings/issues/78. Removes `BetterUnsignedThreshold` from pallet EPM. This will essentially mean any solution submitted by the validator that is strictly better than the current queued solution would be accepted. The reason for having these thresholds is to limit number of solutions submitted on-chain. However for unsigned submissions, the number of solutions that could be submitted on average is limited even without thresholding (calculation shown in the corresponding issue).
-
- Dec 13, 2023
-
-
Gonçalo Pestana authored
This PR adds a round check to the `Call::submit` extrinsic to make sure that the solution submission has been prepared for the current election round and avoid penalties for delayed submissions. Related to https://github.com/paritytech-secops/srlabs_findings/issues/329 --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
Squirrel authored
We currently use a bit of a hack in `.cargo/config` to make sure that clippy isn't too annoying by specifying the list of lints. There is now a stable way to define lints for a workspace. The only down side is that every crate seems to have to opt into this so there's a *few* files modified in this PR. Dependencies: - [x] PR that upgrades CI to use rust 1.74 is merged. --------- Co-authored-by:
-
- Dec 12, 2023
-
-
Ross Bulat authored
Partially Addresses #2500 Adds a `deprecate_controller_batch` call to the staking pallet that is callable by `Root` and `StakingAdmin`. To be used for controller account deprecation and removed thereafter. Adds `MaxControllersDeprecationBatch` pallet constant that defines max possible deprecations per call. - [x] Add `deprecate_controller_batch` call, and `MaxControllersInDeprecationBatch` constant. - [x] Add tests, benchmark, weights. Tests that weight is only consumed if unique pair. - [x] Adds `StakingAdmin` origin to staking's `AdminOrigin` type in westend runtime. - [x] Determined that worst case 5,900 deprecations does fit into `maxBlock` `proofSize` and `refTime` in both normal and operational thresholds, meaning we can deprecate all controllers for each network in one call. ## Block Weights By querying `consts.system.blockWeights` we can see that the `deprecate_controller_batch` weights fit within the `normal` threshold on Polkadot. #### `controller_deprecation_batch` where i = 5900: #### Ref time: 69,933,325,300 #### Proof size: 21,040,390 ### Polkadot ``` // consts.query.blockWeights maxBlock: { refTime: 2,000,000,000,000 proofSize: 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 } normal: { maxExtrinsic: { refTime: 1,479,873,955,000 proofSize: 13,650,590,614,545,068,195 } maxTotal: { refTime: 1,500,000,000,000 proofSize: 13,835,058,055,282,163,711 } } ``` ### Kusama ``` // consts.query.blockWeights maxBlock: { refTime: 2,000,000,000,000 proofSize: 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 } normal: { maxExtrinsic: { refTime: 1,479,875,294,000 proofSize: 13,650,590,614,545,068,195 } maxTotal: { refTime: 1,500,000,000,000 proofSize: 13,835,058,055,282,163,711 } } ``` --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
-
- Dec 01, 2023
-
-
Liam Aharon authored
Using taplo, fixes all our broken and inconsistent toml formatting and adds CI to keep them tidy. If people want we can customise the format rules as described here https://taplo.tamasfe.dev/configuration/formatter-options.html @ggwpez , I suggest zepter is used only for checking features are propagated, and leave formatting for taplo to avoid duplicate work and conflicts. TODO - [x] Use `exclude = [...]` syntax in taplo file to ignore zombienet tests instead of deleting the dir --------- Signed-off-by:
-
- Nov 30, 2023
-
-
Kian Paimani authored
This PR introduces the new crate `developer_hub` into the polkadot-sdk repo. The vision for the developer-hub crate is detailed in [this document](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XLLkFNE8v8HLvZpI2rzsa8N2IN1FcKntc8q-Sc4xBAk/edit?usp=sharing). <img width="1128" alt="Screenshot 2023-11-02 at 10 45 48" src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/5588131/1e12b60f-fef5-42c4-8503-a3ba234077c3"> Other than adding the new crate, it also does the following: * Remove the `substrate` crate, as there is now a unique umbrella crate for multiple things in `developer_hub::polkadot_sdk`. * (backport candidate) A minor change to `frame-support` macros that allows `T::RuntimeOrigin` to also be acceptable as the origin type. * (backport candidate) A minor change to `frame-system` that allows us to deposit events at genesis because now the real genesis config is generated via wasm, and we can safely assume `cfg!(feature = "std")` means only testing. related to #62. * (backport candidate) Introduces a small `read_events_for_pallet` to `frame_system` for easier event reading in tests. * From https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/31, it takes action on improving the `pallet::call` docs. * From https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/31, it takes action on improving the `UncheckedExtrinsic` docs. ## Way Forward First, a version of this is deployed temporarily [here](https://blog.kianenigma.nl/polkadot-sdk/developer_hub/index.html). I will keep it up to date on a daily basis. ### This Pull Request I see two ways forward: 1. We acknowledge that everything in `developer-hub` is going to be WIP, and merge this asap. We should not yet use links to this crate anywhere. 2. We make this be the feature branch, make PRs against this, and either gradually backport it, or only merge to master once it is done. I am personally in favor of option 1. If we stick to option 2, we need a better way to deploy a staging version of this to gh-pages. ### Issue Tracking The main issues related to the future of `developer_hub` are: - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/31 - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/4 - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/26 - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/32 - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/36 ### After This Pull Request - [ ] create a redirect for https://paritytech.github.io/polkadot-sdk/master/substrate/ - [x] analytics - [ ] link checker - [ ] the matter of publishing, and how all of these relative links for when we do, that is still an open question. There is section on this in the landing page. - [ ] updated https://paritytech.github.io/ --------- Co-authored-by:
-
- Nov 28, 2023
-
-
gupnik authored
Step in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/171 This PR adds `derive_impl` on all `frame_system` config impls for mock runtimes. The overridden configs are maintained as of now to ensure minimal changes. --------- Co-authored-by:
-
- Nov 01, 2023
-
-
Ankan authored
helps https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/439. closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/473. PR link in the older substrate repository: https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/13498. # Context Rewards payout is processed today in a single block and limited to `MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator`. This number is currently 512 on both Kusama and Polkadot. This PR tries to scale the nominators payout to an unlimited count in a multi-block fashion. Exposures are stored in pages, with each page capped to a certain number (`MaxExposurePageSize`). Starting out, this number would be the same as `MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator`, but eventually, this number can be lowered through new runtime upgrades to limit the rewardeable nominators per dispatched call instruction. The changes in the PR are backward compatible. ## How payouts would work like after this change Staking exposes two calls, 1) the existing `payout_stakers` and 2) `payout_stakers_by_page`. ### payout_stakers This remains backward compatible with no signature change. If for a given era a validator has multiple pages, they can call `payout_stakers` multiple times. The pages are executed in an ascending sequence and the runtime takes care of preventing double claims. ### payout_stakers_by_page Very similar to `payout_stakers` but also accepts an extra param `page_index`. An account can choose to payout rewards only for an explicitly passed `page_index`. **Lets look at an example scenario** Given an active validator on Kusama had 1100 nominators, `MaxExposurePageSize` set to 512 for Era e. In order to pay out rewards to all nominators, the caller would need to call `payout_stakers` 3 times. - `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the first 512 nominators. - `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the second set of 512 nominators. - `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the last set of 76 nominators. ... - `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => calling it the 4th time would return an error `InvalidPage`. The above calls can also be replaced by `payout_stakers_by_page` and passing a `page_index` explicitly. ## Commission note Validator commission is paid out in chunks across all the pages where each commission chunk is proportional to the total stake of the current page. This implies higher the total stake of a page, higher will be the commission. If all the pages of a validator's single era are paid out, the sum of commission paid to the validator across all pages should be equal to what the commission would have been if we had a non-paged exposure. ### Migration Note Strictly speaking, we did not need to bump our storage version since there is no migration of storage in this PR. But it is still useful to mark a storage upgrade for the following reasons: - New storage items are introduced in this PR while some older storage items are deprecated. - For the next `HistoryDepth` eras, the exposure would be incrementally migrated to its corresponding paged storage item. - Runtimes using staking pallet would strictly need to wait at least `HistoryDepth` eras with current upgraded version (14) for the migration to complete. At some era `E` such that `E > era_at_which_V14_gets_into_effect + HistoryDepth`, we will upgrade to version X which will remove the deprecated storage items. In other words, it is a strict requirement that E<sub>x</sub> - E<sub>14</sub> > `HistoryDepth`, where E<sub>x</sub> = Era at which deprecated storages are removed from runtime, E<sub>14</sub> = Era at which runtime is upgraded to version 14. - For Polkadot and Kusama, there is a [tracker ticket](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/433) to clean up the deprecated storage items. ### Storage Changes #### Added - ErasStakersOverview - ClaimedRewards - ErasStakersPaged #### Deprecated The following can be cleaned up after 84 eras which is tracked [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/433). - ErasStakers. - ErasStakersClipped. - StakingLedger.claimed_rewards, renamed to StakingLedger.legacy_claimed_rewards. ### Config Changes - Renamed MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator to MaxExposurePageSize. ### TODO - [x] Tracker ticket for cleaning up the old code after 84 eras. - [x] Add companion. - [x] Redo benchmarks before merge. - [x] Add Changelog for pallet_staking. - [x] Pallet should be configurable to enable/disable paged rewards. - [x] Commission payouts are distributed across pages. - [x] Review documentation thoroughly. - [x] Rename `MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator` -> `MaxExposurePageSize`. - [x] NMap for `ErasStakersPaged`. - [x] Deprecate ErasStakers. - [x] Integrity tests. ### Followup issues [Runtime api for deprecated ErasStakers storage item](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/426) --------- Co-authored-by:
-
- Oct 24, 2023
-
-
Kian Paimani authored
closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1882 ## Breaking Changes This PR introduces a new item to `pallet_balances::Config`: ```diff trait Config { ++ type RuntimeFreezeReasons; } ``` This value is only used to check it against `type MaxFreeze`. A similar check has been added for `MaxHolds` against `RuntimeHoldReasons`, which is already given to `pallet_balances`. In all contexts, you should pass the real `RuntimeFreezeReasons` generated by `construct_runtime` to `type RuntimeFreezeReasons`. Passing `()` would also work, but it would imply that the runtime uses no freezes at all. --------- Signed-off-by:
-
- Oct 20, 2023
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
The `xcm` crate was renamed to `staging-xcm` to be able to publish it to crates.io as someone as squatted `xcm`. The problem with this rename is that the `TypeInfo` includes the crate name which ultimately lands in the metadata. The metadata is consumed by downstream users like `polkadot-js` or people building on top of `polkadot-js`. These people are using the entire `path` to find the type in the type registry. Thus, their code would break as the type path would now be [`staging_xcm`, `VersionedXcm`] instead of [`xcm`, `VersionedXcm`]. This pull request fixes this by renaming the path segment `staging_xcm` to `xcm`. This requires: https://github.com/paritytech/scale-info/pull/197 --------- Co-authored-by:
-
- Oct 15, 2023
-
-
Gonçalo Pestana authored
This PR refactors the staking ledger logic to encapsulate all reads and mutations of `Ledger`, `Bonded`, `Payee` and stake locks within the `StakingLedger` struct implementation. With these changes, all the reads and mutations to the `Ledger`, `Payee` and `Bonded` storage map should be done through the methods exposed by StakingLedger to ensure the data and lock consistency of the operations. The new introduced methods that mutate and read Ledger are: - `ledger.update()`: inserts/updates a staking ledger in storage; updates staking locks accordingly (and ledger.bond(), which is synthatic sugar for ledger.update()) - `ledger.kill()`: removes all Bonded and StakingLedger related data for a given ledger; updates staking locks accordingly; `StakingLedger::get(account)`: queries both the `Bonded` and `Ledger` storages and returns a `Option<StakingLedger>`. The pallet impl exposes fn ledger(account) as synthatic sugar for `StakingLedger::get(account)`. Retrieving a ledger with `StakingLedger::get()` can be done by providing either a stash or controller account. The input must be wrapped in a `StakingAccount` variant (Stash or Controller) which is treated accordingly. This simplifies the caller API but will eventually be deprecated once we completely get rid of the controller account in staking. However, this refactor will help with the work necessary when completely removing the controller. Other goals: - No logical changes have been introduced in this PR; - No breaking changes or updates in wallets required; - No new storage items or need to perform storage migrations; - Centralise the changes to bonds and ledger updates to simplify the OnStakingUpdate updates to the target list (related to https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/443) Note: it would be great to prevent or at least raise a warning if `Ledger<T>`, `Payee<T>` and `Bonded<T>` storage types are accessed outside the `StakingLedger` implementation. This PR should not get blocked by that feature, but there's a tracking issue here https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/149 Related and step towards https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/443
-
- Oct 01, 2023
-
-
Kian Paimani authored
Moving a few pallets to the latest and greatest `derive_impl` to give it a try. Part of #171 --------- Co-authored-by:
Keith Yeung <[email protected]>
-
- Sep 22, 2023
-
-
Niklas Adolfsson authored
For tools such that is using the `Miner` it's useful to know whether a solution was trimmed or not and also how much that was trimmed. --------- Co-authored-by:
-
- Sep 18, 2023
-
-
Gonçalo Pestana authored
**Note**: This is a lift-and-shift PR from the old substrate and polkadot repos, both PRs have been reviewed and audited (https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/13983, https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7140) --- This PR implements a generic `BaseDeposit` calculation for signed submissions, based on the size of the submission queue. It adds a new associated type to EPM's config, `type SignedDepositBase`, that implements `Convert<usize, BalanceOf<T>>`, which is used to calculate the base deposit for signed submissions based on the size of the signed submissions queue. `struct GeometricDepositBase<Balance, Fixed, Inc>` implements the convert trait so that the deposit value increases as a geometric progression. The deposit base is calculated by `deposit_base = fixed_deposit_base * (1 + increase_factor)^n`, where `n` is the term of the progression (i.e. the number of signed submissions in the queue). `Fixed` and `Inc` generic params are getters for `Balance` and `IncreaseFactor` to compute the geometric progression. If `IncreaseFactor = 0`, then the signed deposit is constant and equal to `Fixed` regardless of the size of the queue. ### Runtime configs In Kusama, the progression with 10% increase without changing the current signed fixed deposit is: (term == size of the queue) Term 1: `1,333,333,332,000` Term 2: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10 = 1,466,666,665,200` Term 3: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^2 = 1,613,333,331,200` Term 4: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^3 = 1,774,666,664,320` Term 5: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^4 = 1,952,133,330,752` Term 6: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^5 = 2,147,346,663,827.20` Term 7: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^6 = 2,362,081,330,210.92` Term 8: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^7 = 2,598,289,463,231.01` Term 9: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^8 = 2,858,118,409,554.11` Term 10: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^9 = 3,143,930,250,509.52` Westend: Term 1: `2,000,000,000,000` Term 2: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10 = 2,200,000,000,000` Term 3: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^2 = 2,420,000,000,000` Term 4: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^3 = 2,662,000,000,000` Term 5: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^4 = 2,928,200,000,000` Term 6: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^5 = 3,221,020,000,000` Term 7: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^6 = 3,543,122,000,000` Term 8: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^7 = 3,897,434,200,000` Term 9: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^8 = 4,287,177,620,000` Term 10: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^9 = 4,715,895,382,000` and in Polkadot, the deposit increase is disabled in the current state of the PR, as the increase factor is 0% -- so nothing changes from the current behaviour. Closes https://github.com/paritytech-secops/srlabs_findings/issues/189
-
- Sep 11, 2023
-
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
* Delete staking miner New repo should be used instead https://github.com/paritytech/staking-miner-v2 Signed-off-by:
-
- Aug 31, 2023
-
-
juangirini authored
* restructure dispatch macro related exports * moved Dispatchable to lib.rs * fix .gitignore final newline * ".git/.scripts/commands/fmt/fmt.sh" * fix rustdocs * wip --------- Co-authored-by:
-
- Aug 30, 2023
-
-
Przemek Rzad authored
* Add missing Cumulus licenses * Typo * Add missing Substrate licenses * Single job checking the sub-repos in steps * Remove dates * Remove dates * Add missing (C) * Update FRAME UI tests Signed-off-by:
-
- Aug 29, 2023
-
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
* Fix build profiles Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1155 Signed-off-by:
-
- Aug 28, 2023
-
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
* Manually fix conflicting ? Signed-off-by:
🤦 Signed-off-by:
-
- Aug 25, 2023
-
-
Alexander authoredSigned-off-by:alvicsam <[email protected]>
-
- Aug 24, 2023
-
-
juangirini authored
* make reexports private * make reexports private 2 * make reexports private for runtime-benchmarking * make reexports private for try-runtime * fix for try-runtime * make reexports private for tests * fmt * make reexports private for tests * make reexports private for experimental * fix beefy * fix ui test * fix ui test * fix benches * ".git/.scripts/commands/fmt/fmt.sh" * fix contracts use * wip * wip * do not reexport sp_api::metadata_ir * fix CI checks * fix support tests * ".git/.scripts/commands/fmt/fmt.sh" * Update frame/support/src/lib.rs Co-authored-by:
-
- Aug 23, 2023
-
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
* CI: Add feature sorting check Signed-off-by:
-
juangirini authored
* make reexports private * make reexports private 2 * make reexports private for runtime-benchmarking * make reexports private for try-runtime * fix for try-runtime * make reexports private for tests * fmt * make reexports private for tests * make reexports private for experimental * fix beefy * fix ui test * fix ui test * fix benches * ".git/.scripts/commands/fmt/fmt.sh" * fix contracts use * wip * wip * do not reexport sp_api::metadata_ir * fix CI checks * fix support tests * ".git/.scripts/commands/fmt/fmt.sh" * Update frame/support/src/lib.rs Co-authored-by:
-
- Aug 10, 2023
-
-
Gonçalo Pestana authored
* Implements dynamic nominations per nominator * Adds SnapshotBounds and ElectionSizeTracker * Changes the ElectionDataProvider interface to receive ElectionBounds as input * Implements get_npos_voters with ElectionBounds * Implements get_npos_targets with ElectionBounds * Adds comments * tests * Truncates nomninations that exceed nominations quota; Old tests passing * Uses DataProviderBounds and ElectionBounds (to continue) * Finishes conversions - tests passing * Refactor staking in babe mocks * Replaces MaxElectableTargets and MaxElectingVoters with ElectionBounds; Adds more tests * Fixes nits; node compiling * bechmarks * removes nomination_quota extrinsic to request the nomination quota * Lazy quota check, ie. at nominate time only * remove non-working test (for now) * tests lazy nominations quota when quota is lower than current number of nominated targets * Adds runtime API and custom RPC call for clients to query the nominations quota for a given balance * removes old rpc * Cosmetic touches * All mocks working * Fixes benchmarking mocks * nits * more tests * renames trait methods * nit * ".git/.scripts/commands/fmt/fmt.sh" * Fix V2 PoV benchmarking (#13485) * Bump default 'additional_trie_layers' to two The default here only works for extremely small runtimes, which have no more than 16 storage prefices. This is changed to a "sane" default of 2, which is save for runtimes with up to 4096 storage prefices (eg StorageValue). Signed-off-by:
Anthony Lazam <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Piotr Mikołajczyk <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
-
- Aug 01, 2023
-
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
* Fix std, runtime-benchmarks and try-runtime features zepter lint propagate-feature --feature try-runtime --left-side-feature-missing=ignore --workspace --fix --feature-enables-dep="try-runtime:frame-try-runtime" zepter lint propagate-feature --feature runtime-benchmarks --left-side-feature-missing=ignore --workspace --fix --feature-enables-dep="runtime-benchmarks:frame-benchmarking" zepter lint propagate-feature --feature std --left-side-feature-missing=ignore --workspace --fix Signed-off-by:
-
- Jul 24, 2023
-
-
Gonçalo Pestana authored
Co-authored-by: parity-processbot <>
-
- Jul 18, 2023
-
-
Gonçalo Pestana authored
* Staking e2e test - case when ledger active balance falls below ED * Update frame/election-provider-multi-phase/test-staking-e2e/src/lib.rs Co-authored-by:
Ankan <[email protected]> * Simplifies test assertions; tests events --------- Co-authored-by:
-
