Skip to content
  1. Oct 24, 2023
  3. Oct 23, 2023
  5. Oct 22, 2023
    • Bastian Köcher's avatar
      sc-executor: Increase maximum instance count (#1856) · e2b21d00
      Bastian Köcher authored 
      

Changes the maximum instances count for `wasmtime` to `64`. It also
allows to only pass in maximum `32` for `--max-runtime-instances` as
`256` was way too big. With `64` instances in total and `32` that can be
configured in maximum, there should be enough space to accommodate for
extra instances that are may required to be allocated adhoc.

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarKoute <[email protected]>
      e2b21d00
  7. Oct 21, 2023
  9. Oct 20, 2023
  11. Oct 19, 2023
  13. Oct 18, 2023
    • Bulat Saifullin's avatar
      Update kusama/polkadot bootnodes (#1895) · 3e980219
      Bulat Saifullin authored 
      closes: https://github.com/paritytech/devops/issues/2090

## Changes
1. Updated the list of bootnodes.
2. Merged the Connect node and bootnode into a single node.
3. Decreased the number of nodes.
4. Updated the DNS name.

## Description
The initial 8 bootnodes were planned to be replaced by community
bootnodes, the community node was added but we did not bother to reduce
the Parity managed bootnodes. Fixing it now.
      3e980219
    • Keith Yeung's avatar
      Introduce XcmFeesToAccount fee manager (#1234) · 3dece311
      Keith Yeung authored 
      

Combination of paritytech/polkadot#7005, its addon PR
paritytech/polkadot#7585 and its companion paritytech/cumulus#2433.

This PR introduces a new XcmFeesToAccount struct which implements the
`FeeManager` trait, and assigns this struct as the `FeeManager` in the
XCM config for all runtimes.

The struct simply deposits all fees handled by the XCM executor to a
specified account. In all runtimes, the specified account is configured
as the treasury account.

XCM __delivery__ fees are now being introduced (unless the root origin
is sending a message to a system parachain on behalf of the originating
chain).

# Note for reviewers

Most file changes are tests that had to be modified to account for the
new fees.
Main changes are in:
- cumulus/pallets/xcmp-queue/src/lib.rs <- To make it track the delivery
fees exponential factor
- polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/fee_handling.rs <- Added. Has the
FeeManager implementation
- All runtime xcm_config files <- To add the FeeManager to the XCM
configuration

# Important note

After this change, instructions that create and send a new XCM (Query*,
Report*, ExportMessage, InitiateReserveWithdraw, InitiateTeleport,
DepositReserveAsset, TransferReserveAsset, LockAsset and RequestUnlock)
will require the corresponding origin account in the origin register to
pay for transport delivery fees, and the onward message will fail to be
sent if the origin account does not have the required amount. This
delivery fee is on top of what we already collect as tx fees in
pallet-xcm and XCM BuyExecution fees!

Wallet UIs that want to expose the new delivery fee can do so using the
formula:

```
delivery_fee_factor * (base_fee + encoded_msg_len * per_byte_fee)
```

where the delivery fee factor can be obtained from the corresponding
pallet based on which transport you are using (UMP, HRMP or bridges),
the base fee is a constant, the encoded message length from the message
itself and the per byte fee is the same as the configured per byte fee
for txs (i.e. `TransactionByteFee`).

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarjoe petrowski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarGiles Cope <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarLiam Aharon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarKian Paimani <[email protected]>
      3dece311
    • Javyer's avatar
      upgraded review bot to v2.1.0 (#1908) · 1cf7d3aa
      Javyer authored 
      Upgraded to version 2.1.0 which has paritytech/review-bot#94, a change
in the logic of the action to overcome some problems with permissions
coming from PRs from forks

For this, we needed to divide the actions into two files:
- A first action that triggers on PRs and reviews and uploads the PR
number.
- A second action which is triggered under the completion of the first
one and runs as the action normally runs (but won't have any problems
regarding permissions because it is triggered from the master branch)
      1cf7d3aa