- Jan 22, 2024
-
-
joe petrowski authored
Clean up all the old syntax. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: gupnik <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Nikhil Gupta <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Maksym H <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 18, 2024
-
-
Tsvetomir Dimitrov authored
Backport of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1863 to master Extend candidate sanitation in paras_inherent by removing backing votes from disabled validators. Check https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1592 for more details. This change is related to the disabling strategy implementation (https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2226). --------- Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Maciej <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 17, 2024
-
-
Egor_P authored
This PR backports version bumps from release branch `release-polkadot-v1.6.0` back to `master` and also moved `prdoc` files related to the release to the appropriate folder
-
- Jan 16, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
# Note for reviewer Most changes are just syntax changes necessary for the new version. Most important files should be the ones under the `xcm` folder. # Description Added XCMv4. ## Removed `Multi` prefix The following types have been renamed: - MultiLocation -> Location - MultiAsset -> Asset - MultiAssets -> Assets - InteriorMultiLocation -> InteriorLocation - MultiAssetFilter -> AssetFilter - VersionedMultiAsset -> VersionedAsset - WildMultiAsset -> WildAsset - VersionedMultiLocation -> VersionedLocation In order to fix a name conflict, the `Assets` in `xcm-executor` were renamed to `HoldingAssets`, as they represent assets in holding. ## Removed `Abstract` asset id It was not being used anywhere and this simplifies the code. Now assets are just constructed as follows: ```rust let asset: Asset = (AssetId(Location::new(1, Here)), 100u128).into(); ``` No need for specifying `Concrete` anymore. ## Outcome is now a named fields struct Instead of ```rust pub enum Outcome { Complete(Weight), Incomplete(Weight, Error), Error(Error), } ``` we now have ```rust pub enum Outcome { Complete { used: Weight }, Incomplete { used: Weight, error: Error }, Error { error: Error }, } ``` ## Added Reanchorable trait Now both locations and assets implement this trait, making it easier to reanchor both. ## New syntax for building locations and junctions Now junctions are built using the following methods: ```rust let location = Location { parents: 1, interior: [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)].into() }; ``` or ```rust let location = Location::new(1, [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)]); ``` And they are matched like so: ```rust match location.unpack() { (1, [Parachain(id)]) => ... (0, Here) => ..., (1, [_]) => ..., } ``` This syntax is mandatory in v4, and has been also implemented for v2 and v3 for easier migration. This was needed to make all sizes smaller. # TODO - [x] Scaffold v4 - [x] Port github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7236 - [x] Remove `Multi` prefix - [x] Remove `Abstract` asset id --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Keith Yeung <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 10, 2024
-
-
joe petrowski authored
This PR allows _username authorities_ to issue unique usernames that correspond with an account. It also provides two-way lookup, that is from `AccountId` to a single, "primary" `Username` (alongside `Registration`) and multiple unique `Username`s to an `AccountId`. Key features: - Username Authorities added (and removed) via privileged origin. - Authorities have a `suffix` and an `allocation`. They can grant up to `allocation` usernames. Their `suffix` will be appended to the usernames that they issue. A suffix may be up to 7 characters long. - Users can ask an authority to grant them a username. This will take the form `myusername.suffix`. The entire name (including suffix) must be less than or equal to 32 alphanumeric characters. - Users can approve a username for themselves in one of two ways (that is, authorities cannot grant them arbitrarily): - Pre-sign the entire username (including suffix) with a secret key that corresponds to their `AccountId` (for keyed accounts, obviously); or - Accept the username after it has been granted by an authority (it will be queued until accepted) (for non-keyed accounts like pure proxies or multisigs). - The system does not require any funds or deposits. Users without an identity will be given a default one (presumably all fields set to `None`). If they update this info, they will need to place the normal storage deposit. - If a user does not have any username, their first one will be set as `Primary`, and their `AccountId` will map to that one. If they get subsequent usernames, they can choose which one to be their primary via `set_primary_username`. - There are some state cleanup functions to remove expired usernames that have not been accepted and dangling usernames whose owners have called `clear_identity`. TODO: - [x] Add migration to runtimes - [x] Probably do off-chain migration into People Chain genesis - [x] Address a few TODO questions in code (please review) --------- Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]>
-
- Jan 06, 2024
-
-
Serban Iorga authored
Related to https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2787 Adding BEEFY support to the kitchensink chain in order to be able to extend the current warp sync zombienet tests with BEEFY enabled
-
- Dec 21, 2023
-
-
eskimor authored
Also fixes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1417 - [x] CoreIndex -> AssignmentProvider mapping will be able to change any time. - [x] Implement - [x] Provide Migrations - [x] Add and fix tests - [x] Implement bulk assigner logic - [x] bulk assigner tests - [x] Port over current assigner to use bulk designer (+ share on-demand with bulk): top-level assigner has core ranges: legacy, bulk - [x] Adjust migrations to reflect new assigner structure - [x] Move migration code to Assignment code directly and make it recursive (make it possible to skip releases) -> follow up ticket. - [x] Test migrations - [x] Add migration PR to runtimes repo -> follow up ticket. - [x] Wire up with actual UMP messages - [x] Write PR docs --------- Co-authored-by: eskimor <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bradley Olson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: BradleyOlson64 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Anton Vilhelm Ásgeirsson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: antonva <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Marcin S. <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Dec 15, 2023
-
-
Ankan authored
closes https://github.com/paritytech-secops/srlabs_findings/issues/78. Removes `BetterUnsignedThreshold` from pallet EPM. This will essentially mean any solution submitted by the validator that is strictly better than the current queued solution would be accepted. The reason for having these thresholds is to limit number of solutions submitted on-chain. However for unsigned submissions, the number of solutions that could be submitted on average is limited even without thresholding (calculation shown in the corresponding issue).
-
- Dec 14, 2023
-
-
Egor_P authored
This PR backports `transaction_version` bump from `1.5.0` release back to `master`
-
- Dec 13, 2023
-
-
Alexandru Gheorghe authored
Initial implementation for the plan discussed here: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/701 Built on top of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1178 v0: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7554, ## Overall idea When approval-voting checks a candidate and is ready to advertise the approval, defer it in a per-relay chain block until we either have MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT candidates to sign or a candidate has stayed MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS in the queue, in both cases we sign what candidates we have available. This should allow us to reduce the number of approvals messages we have to create/send/verify. The parameters are configurable, so we should find some values that balance: - Security of the network: Delaying broadcasting of an approval shouldn't but the finality at risk and to make sure that never happens we won't delay sending a vote if we are past 2/3 from the no-show time. - Scalability of the network: MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT = 1 & MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS =0, is what we have now and we know from the measurements we did on versi, it bottlenecks approval-distribution/approval-voting when increase significantly the number of validators and parachains - Block storage: In case of disputes we have to import this votes on chain and that increase the necessary storage with MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT * CandidateHash per vote. Given that disputes are not the normal way of the network functioning and we will limit MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT in the single digits numbers, this should be good enough. Alternatively, we could try to create a better way to store this on-chain through indirection, if that's needed. ## Other fixes: - Fixed the fact that we were sending random assignments to non-validators, that was wrong because those won't do anything with it and they won't gossip it either because they do not have a grid topology set, so we would waste the random assignments. - Added metrics to be able to debug potential no-shows and mis-processing of approvals/assignments. ## TODO: - [x] Get feedback, that this is moving in the right direction. @ordian @sandreim @eskimor @burdges, let me know what you think. - [x] More and more testing. - [x] Test in versi. - [x] Make MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT & MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_WAIT_MILLIS a parachain host configuration. - [x] Make sure the backwards compatibility works correctly - [x] Make sure this direction is compatible with other streams of work: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/635 & https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/742 - [x] Final versi burn-in before merging --------- Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
-
- Dec 12, 2023
-
-
Chevdor authored
This PR introduces a script and some templates to use the prdoc involved in a release and build: - the changelog - a simple draft of audience documentation Since the prdoc presence was enforced in the middle of the version 1.5.0, not all PRs did come with a `prdoc` file. This PR creates all the missing `prdoc` files with some minimum content allowing to properly generate the changelog. The generated content is **not** suitable for the audience documentation. The audience documentation will be possible with the next version, when all PR come with a proper `prdoc`. ## Assumptions - the prdoc files for release `vX.Y.Z` have been moved under `prdoc/X.Y.Z` - the changelog requires for now for the prdoc files to contain author + topic. Thos fields are optional. The build script can be called as: ``` VERSION=X.Y.Z ./scripts/release/build-changelogs.sh ``` Related: - #1408 --------- Co-authored-by: EgorPopelyaev <[email protected]>
-
Ross Bulat authored
Partially Addresses #2500 Adds a `deprecate_controller_batch` call to the staking pallet that is callable by `Root` and `StakingAdmin`. To be used for controller account deprecation and removed thereafter. Adds `MaxControllersDeprecationBatch` pallet constant that defines max possible deprecations per call. - [x] Add `deprecate_controller_batch` call, and `MaxControllersInDeprecationBatch` constant. - [x] Add tests, benchmark, weights. Tests that weight is only consumed if unique pair. - [x] Adds `StakingAdmin` origin to staking's `AdminOrigin` type in westend runtime. - [x] Determined that worst case 5,900 deprecations does fit into `maxBlock` `proofSize` and `refTime` in both normal and operational thresholds, meaning we can deprecate all controllers for each network in one call. ## Block Weights By querying `consts.system.blockWeights` we can see that the `deprecate_controller_batch` weights fit within the `normal` threshold on Polkadot. #### `controller_deprecation_batch` where i = 5900: #### Ref time: 69,933,325,300 #### Proof size: 21,040,390 ### Polkadot ``` // consts.query.blockWeights maxBlock: { refTime: 2,000,000,000,000 proofSize: 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 } normal: { maxExtrinsic: { refTime: 1,479,873,955,000 proofSize: 13,650,590,614,545,068,195 } maxTotal: { refTime: 1,500,000,000,000 proofSize: 13,835,058,055,282,163,711 } } ``` ### Kusama ``` // consts.query.blockWeights maxBlock: { refTime: 2,000,000,000,000 proofSize: 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 } normal: { maxExtrinsic: { refTime: 1,479,875,294,000 proofSize: 13,650,590,614,545,068,195 } maxTotal: { refTime: 1,500,000,000,000 proofSize: 13,835,058,055,282,163,711 } } ``` --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Pestana <[email protected]>
-
- Dec 11, 2023
-
-
Gabriel Facco de Arruda authored
This PR makes the block number provider configurable through the Config trait in pallet-vesting, this gives parachains the option to use the relay chain block number provider from ParachainSystem. --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
- Dec 07, 2023
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2641
-
- Dec 06, 2023
-
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
# Motivation (+testing) ### Enable easy `ForeignAssets` transfers using `pallet-xcm` We had just previously added capabilities to teleport fees during reserve-based transfers, but what about reserve-transferring fees when needing to teleport some non-fee asset? This PR aligns everything under either explicit reserve-transfer, explicit teleport, or this new flexible `transfer_assets()` which can mix and match as needed with fewer artificial constraints imposed to the user. This will enable, for example, a (non-system) parachain to teleport their `ForeignAssets` assets to AssetHub while using DOT to pay fees. (the assets are teleported - as foreign assets should from their owner chain - while DOT used for fees can only be reserve-based transferred between said parachain and AssetHub). Added `xcm-emulator` tests for this scenario ^. # Description Reverts `(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets` to only allow reserve-based transfers for all `assets` including fees. Similarly `(limited_)teleport_assets` only allows teleports for all `assets` including fees. For complex combinations of asset transfers where assets and fees may have different reserves or different reserve/teleport trust configurations, users can use the newly added `transfer_assets()` extrinsic which is more flexible in allowing more complex scenarios. `assets` (excluding `fees`) must have same reserve location or otherwise be teleportable to `dest`. No limitations imposed on `fees`. - for local reserve: transfer assets to sovereign account of destination chain and forward a notification XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`. - for destination reserve: burn local assets and forward a notification to `dest` chain to withdraw the reserve assets from this chain's sovereign account and deposit them to `beneficiary`. - for remote reserve: burn local assets, forward XCM to reserve chain to move reserves from this chain's SA to `dest` chain's SA, and forward another XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`. - for teleports: burn local assets and forward XCM to `dest` chain to mint/teleport assets and deposit them to `beneficiary`. ## Review notes Only around 500 lines are prod code (see `pallet_xcm/src/lib.rs`), the rest of the PR is new tests and improving existing tests. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Dec 05, 2023
-
-
gupnik authored
-
- Nov 29, 2023
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
The `BlockNumber` and `Hash` are fixed types any way.
-
- Nov 28, 2023
-
-
s0me0ne-unkn0wn authored
Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vladimir Istyufeev <[email protected]>
-
Ross Bulat authored
Addresses #409. This request has been raised by multiple community members - the ability for the nomination pool root role to configure permissionless commission claiming: > Would it be possible to have a claim_commission_other extrinsic for claiming commission of nomination pools permissionless? This PR does not quite introduce this additional call, but amends `do_claim_commission` to check a new `claim_permission` field in the `Commission` struct, configured by an enum: ``` enum CommissionClaimPermission { Permissionless, Account(AccountId), } ``` This can be optionally set in a bonded pool's `commission.claim_permission` field: ``` struct BondedPool { commission: { <snip> claim_permission: Option<CommissionClaimPermission<T::AccountId>>, }, <snip> } ``` This is a new field and requires a migration to add it to existing pools. This will be `None` on pool creation, falling back to the `root` role having sole access to claim commission if it is not set; this is the behaviour as it is today. Once set, the field _can_ be set to `None` again. #### Changes - [x] Add `commision.claim_permission` field. - [x] Add `can_claim_commission` and amend `do_claim_commission`. - [x] Add `set_commission_claim_permission` call. - [x] Test to cover new configs and call. - [x] Add and amend benchmarks. - [x] Generate new weights + slot into call `set_commission_claim_permission`. - [x] Add migration to introduce `commission.claim_permission`, bump storage version. - [x] Update Westend weights. - [x] Migration working. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Nov 27, 2023
-
-
Chevdor authored
## Overview This PR aligns the `spec_version` formatting to the [recent changes](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/26/files#diff-efa4caeb17487ecb13d8f5eb7863c3241d84afa2e73fbf25909a2ca89df0f362R142) made for the Polkadot/Kusama runtimes. It also backports the latest version `v1.4.0` bumps as `1_004_000`. ## Details During the switch from `v0.9` to `v1.x`, the format of the `spec_version` was modified from: `(M)m_ppp` for a runtime considered on version `M.m.pp`. For instance `0.9.42` had a `spec_version` of `9420`. With the transition to `v1.x`, the format was changed to a bigger number (still `u32`) formatted as `MM_mm_ppp` where `1.2.3` would be stored as `01_02_003`. This PR aligns the format with that has been introduced in the fellowship repo: `MMM_mmm_ppp`. --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 17, 2023
-
-
Bruno Galvao authored
The versioned migrations are already there in pallet nomination-pools: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/f6ee4781/substrate/frame/nomination-pools/src/migration.rs#L27-L48 Just updating the kitchensink runtime to point to them. This is also nice because it points the dev to an example of how to use `VersionedMigration`.
-
- Nov 16, 2023
-
-
joe petrowski authored
Missed in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1672
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
Westend now successfully updated to `spec: 103000`, we **have to remove** the session keys migration before the next release as it doesn't gracefully handle reapplying it.
-
- Nov 15, 2023
-
-
joe petrowski authored
The goal of this PR is to migrate Identity deposits from the Relay Chain to a system parachain. The problem I want to solve is that `IdentityOf` and `SubsOf` both store an amount that's held in reserve as a storage deposit. When migrating to a parachain, we can take a snapshot of the actual `IdentityInfo` and sub-account mappings, but should migrate (off chain) the `deposit`s to zero, since the chain (and by extension, accounts) won't have any funds at genesis. The good news is that we expect parachain deposits to be significantly lower (possibly 100x) on the parachain. That is, a deposit of 21 DOT on the Relay Chain would need 0.21 DOT on a parachain. This PR proposes to migrate the deposits in the following way: 1. Introduces a new pallet with two extrinsics: - `reap_identity`: Has a configurable `ReapOrigin`, which would be set to `EnsureSigned` on the Relay Chain (i.e. callable by anyone) and `EnsureRoot` on the parachain (we don't want identities reaped from there). - `poke_deposit`: Checks what deposit the pallet holds (at genesis, zero) and attempts to update the amount based on the calculated deposit for storage data. 2. `reap_identity` clears all storage data for a `target` account and unreserves their deposit. 3. A `ReapIdentityHandler` teleports the necessary DOT to the parachain and calls `poke_deposit`. Since the parachain deposit is much lower, and was just unreserved, we know we have enough. One awkwardness I ran into was that the XCMv3 instruction set does not provide a way for the system to teleport assets without a fee being deducted on reception. Users shouldn't have to pay a fee for the system to migrate their info to a more efficient location. So I wrote my own program and did the `InitiateTeleport` accounting on my own to send a program with `UnpaidExecution`. Have discussed an `InitiateUnpaidTeleport` instruction with @franciscoaguirre . Obviously any chain executing this would have to pass a `Barrier` for free execution. TODO: - [x] Confirm People Chain ParaId - [x] Confirm People Chain deposit rates (determined in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2281) - [x] Add pallet to Westend --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 14, 2023
-
-
Alin Dima authored
Adds a `NodeFeatures` bitfield value to the runtime `HostConfiguration`, with the purpose of coordinating the enabling of node-side features, such as: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/628 and https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/598. These are features that require all validators enable them at the same time, assuming all/most nodes have upgraded their node versions. This PR doesn't add any feature yet. These are coming in future PRs. Also adds a runtime API for querying the state of the client features and an extrinsic for setting/unsetting a feature by its index in the bitfield. Note: originally part of: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1644, but posted as standalone to be reused by other PRs until the initial PR is merged
-
- Nov 13, 2023
-
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
## Motivation `pallet-xcm` is the main user-facing interface for XCM functionality, including assets manipulation functions like `teleportAssets()` and `reserve_transfer_assets()` calls. While `teleportAsset()` works both ways, `reserve_transfer_assets()` works only for sending reserve-based assets to a remote destination and beneficiary when the reserve is the _local chain_. ## Solution This PR enhances `pallet_xcm::(limited_)reserve_withdraw_assets` to support transfers when reserves are other chains. This will allow complete, **bi-directional** reserve-based asset transfers user stories using `pallet-xcm`. Enables following scenarios: - transferring assets with local reserve (was previously supported iff asset used as fee also had local reserve - now it works in all cases), - transferring assets with reserve on destination, - transferring assets with reserve on remote/third-party chain (iff assets and fees have same remote reserve), - transferring assets with reserve different than the reserve of the asset to be used as fees - meaning can be used to transfer random asset with local/dest reserve while using DOT for fees on all involved chains, even if DOT local/dest reserve doesn't match asset reserve, - transferring assets with any type of local/dest reserve while using fees which can be teleported between involved chains. All of the above is done by pallet inner logic without the user having to specify which scenario/reserves/teleports/etc. The correct scenario and corresponding XCM programs are identified, and respectively, built automatically based on runtime configuration of trusted teleporters and trusted reserves. #### Current limitations: - while `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CAN have different reserves (or fees CAN be teleported), the remaining "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT, among themselves, have different reserve locations (this is also implicitly enforced by `MAX_ASSETS_FOR_TRANSFER=2`, but this can be safely increased in the future). - `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT have **different remote** reserves (this could also be supported in the future, but adds even more complexity while possibly not being worth it - we'll see what the future holds). Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1584 Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2055 --------- Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>
-
Bastian Köcher authored
Remove the `GRANDPA_AUTHORITIES_KEY` key and its usage. Apparently this was used in the early days to communicate the grandpa authorities to the node. However, we have now a runtime api that does this for us. So, this pull request is moving from the custom managed storage item to a FRAME managed storage item. This pr also includes a migration for doing the switch on a running chain. --------- Co-authored-by: Davide Galassi <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 10, 2023
-
-
Liam Aharon authored
As suggested by @ggwpez (https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2142#discussion_r1388145872), remove the `VersionChecked` prefix from version checked migrations (but leave `VersionUnchecked` prefixes) --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Nov 03, 2023
-
-
georgepisaltu authored
This PR is a follow up to #1661 - [x] rename the `simple` module to `legacy` - [x] fix benchmarks to disregard the number of additional fields - [x] change the storage deposits to charge per encoded byte of the identity information instance, removing the need for `fn additional(&self) -> usize` in `IdentityInformationProvider` - [x] ~add an extrinsic to rejig deposits to account for the change above~ - [ ] ~ensure through proper configuration that the new byte-based deposit is always lower than whatever is reserved now~ - [x] remove `IdentityFields` from the `set_fields` extrinsic signature, as per [this discussion](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1661#discussion_r1371703403) > ensure through proper configuration that the new byte-based deposit is always lower than whatever is reserved now Not sure this is needed anymore. If the new deposits are higher than what is currently on chain and users don't have enough funds to reserve what is needed, the extrinisc fails and they're basically grandfathered and frozen until they add more funds and/or make a change to their identity. This behavior seems fine to me. Original idea [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1661#issuecomment-1779606319). > add an extrinsic to rejig deposits to account for the change above This was initially implemented but now removed from this PR in favor of the implementation detailed [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2088). --------- Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: joepetrowski <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 01, 2023
-
-
Ankan authored
helps https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/439. closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/473. PR link in the older substrate repository: https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/13498. # Context Rewards payout is processed today in a single block and limited to `MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator`. This number is currently 512 on both Kusama and Polkadot. This PR tries to scale the nominators payout to an unlimited count in a multi-block fashion. Exposures are stored in pages, with each page capped to a certain number (`MaxExposurePageSize`). Starting out, this number would be the same as `MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator`, but eventually, this number can be lowered through new runtime upgrades to limit the rewardeable nominators per dispatched call instruction. The changes in the PR are backward compatible. ## How payouts would work like after this change Staking exposes two calls, 1) the existing `payout_stakers` and 2) `payout_stakers_by_page`. ### payout_stakers This remains backward compatible with no signature change. If for a given era a validator has multiple pages, they can call `payout_stakers` multiple times. The pages are executed in an ascending sequence and the runtime takes care of preventing double claims. ### payout_stakers_by_page Very similar to `payout_stakers` but also accepts an extra param `page_index`. An account can choose to payout rewards only for an explicitly passed `page_index`. **Lets look at an example scenario** Given an active validator on Kusama had 1100 nominators, `MaxExposurePageSize` set to 512 for Era e. In order to pay out rewards to all nominators, the caller would need to call `payout_stakers` 3 times. - `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the first 512 nominators. - `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the second set of 512 nominators. - `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the last set of 76 nominators. ... - `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => calling it the 4th time would return an error `InvalidPage`. The above calls can also be replaced by `payout_stakers_by_page` and passing a `page_index` explicitly. ## Commission note Validator commission is paid out in chunks across all the pages where each commission chunk is proportional to the total stake of the current page. This implies higher the total stake of a page, higher will be the commission. If all the pages of a validator's single era are paid out, the sum of commission paid to the validator across all pages should be equal to what the commission would have been if we had a non-paged exposure. ### Migration Note Strictly speaking, we did not need to bump our storage version since there is no migration of storage in this PR. But it is still useful to mark a storage upgrade for the following reasons: - New storage items are introduced in this PR while some older storage items are deprecated. - For the next `HistoryDepth` eras, the exposure would be incrementally migrated to its corresponding paged storage item. - Runtimes using staking pallet would strictly need to wait at least `HistoryDepth` eras with current upgraded version (14) for the migration to complete. At some era `E` such that `E > era_at_which_V14_gets_into_effect + HistoryDepth`, we will upgrade to version X which will remove the deprecated storage items. In other words, it is a strict requirement that E<sub>x</sub> - E<sub>14</sub> > `HistoryDepth`, where E<sub>x</sub> = Era at which deprecated storages are removed from runtime, E<sub>14</sub> = Era at which runtime is upgraded to version 14. - For Polkadot and Kusama, there is a [tracker ticket](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/433) to clean up the deprecated storage items. ### Storage Changes #### Added - ErasStakersOverview - ClaimedRewards - ErasStakersPaged #### Deprecated The following can be cleaned up after 84 eras which is tracked [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/433). - ErasStakers. - ErasStakersClipped. - StakingLedger.claimed_rewards, renamed to StakingLedger.legacy_claimed_rewards. ### Config Changes - Renamed MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator to MaxExposurePageSize. ### TODO - [x] Tracker ticket for cleaning up the old code after 84 eras. - [x] Add companion. - [x] Redo benchmarks before merge. - [x] Add Changelog for pallet_staking. - [x] Pallet should be configurable to enable/disable paged rewards. - [x] Commission payouts are distributed across pages. - [x] Review documentation thoroughly. - [x] Rename `MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator` -> `MaxExposurePageSize`. - [x] NMap for `ErasStakersPaged`. - [x] Deprecate ErasStakers. - [x] Integrity tests. ### Followup issues [Runtime api for deprecated ErasStakers storage item](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/426) --------- Co-authored-by: Javier Viola <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ross Bulat <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Oct 31, 2023
-
-
Adel Arja authored
# Description The `trigger_defensive` call has been added to the `root-testing` pallet. The idea is to have this pallet running on `Rococo/Westend` and use it to verify if the runtime monitoring works end-to-end. To accomplish this, `trigger_defensive` dispatches an event when it is called. Closes #1953 # Checklist - [x] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the "Description" section above - [ ] My PR follows the [labeling requirements](CONTRIBUTING.md#Process) of this project (at minimum one label for `T` required) - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if applicable) - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if applicable) You can remove the "Checklist" section once all have been checked. Thank you for your contribution! ✄ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
-
- Oct 24, 2023
-
-
georgepisaltu authored
Fixes #179 # Description This PR makes the structure containing identity information used in `pallet-identity` generic through the pallet `Config`. Additionally, the old structure is now available in a separate module called `simple` (pending rename) and is compatible with the new interface. Another change in this PR is that while the `additional` field in `IdentityInfo` stays for backwards compatibility reasons, the associated costs are stil present in the pallet through the `additional` function in the `IdentityInformationProvider` interface. This function is marked as deprecated as it is only a temporary solution to the backwards compatibility problem we had. In short, we could have removed the additional fields in the struct and done a migration, but we chose to wait and do it off-chain through the genesis of the system parachain. After we move the identity pallet to the parachain, additional fields will be migrated into the existing fields and the `additional` key-value store will be removed. Until that happens, this interface will provide the necessary information to properly account for the associated costs. Additionally, this PR fixes an unrelated issue; the `IdentityField` enum used to represent the fields as bitflags couldn't store more than 8 fields, even though it was marked as `#[repr(u64)]`. This was because of the `derive` implementation of `TypeInfo`, which assumed `u8` semantics. The custom implementation of this trait in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/commit/0105cc03 fixes the issue. --------- Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sam Johnson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]>
-
Kian Paimani authored
closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1882 ## Breaking Changes This PR introduces a new item to `pallet_balances::Config`: ```diff trait Config { ++ type RuntimeFreezeReasons; } ``` This value is only used to check it against `type MaxFreeze`. A similar check has been added for `MaxHolds` against `RuntimeHoldReasons`, which is already given to `pallet_balances`. In all contexts, you should pass the real `RuntimeFreezeReasons` generated by `construct_runtime` to `type RuntimeFreezeReasons`. Passing `()` would also work, but it would imply that the runtime uses no freezes at all. --------- Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
-
- Oct 23, 2023
-
-
joe petrowski authored
Reverts https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1476 The `lock_pallet` / `unlock_pallet` additions in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1814 will result in less downtime for users than using runtime upgrades.
-
- Oct 18, 2023
-
-
Keith Yeung authored
Combination of paritytech/polkadot#7005, its addon PR paritytech/polkadot#7585 and its companion paritytech/cumulus#2433. This PR introduces a new XcmFeesToAccount struct which implements the `FeeManager` trait, and assigns this struct as the `FeeManager` in the XCM config for all runtimes. The struct simply deposits all fees handled by the XCM executor to a specified account. In all runtimes, the specified account is configured as the treasury account. XCM __delivery__ fees are now being introduced (unless the root origin is sending a message to a system parachain on behalf of the originating chain). # Note for reviewers Most file changes are tests that had to be modified to account for the new fees. Main changes are in: - cumulus/pallets/xcmp-queue/src/lib.rs <- To make it track the delivery fees exponential factor - polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/fee_handling.rs <- Added. Has the FeeManager implementation - All runtime xcm_config files <- To add the FeeManager to the XCM configuration # Important note After this change, instructions that create and send a new XCM (Query*, Report*, ExportMessage, InitiateReserveWithdraw, InitiateTeleport, DepositReserveAsset, TransferReserveAsset, LockAsset and RequestUnlock) will require the corresponding origin account in the origin register to pay for transport delivery fees, and the onward message will fail to be sent if the origin account does not have the required amount. This delivery fee is on top of what we already collect as tx fees in pallet-xcm and XCM BuyExecution fees! Wallet UIs that want to expose the new delivery fee can do so using the formula: ``` delivery_fee_factor * (base_fee + encoded_msg_len * per_byte_fee) ``` where the delivery fee factor can be obtained from the corresponding pallet based on which transport you are using (UMP, HRMP or bridges), the base fee is a constant, the encoded message length from the message itself and the per byte fee is the same as the configured per byte fee for txs (i.e. `TransactionByteFee`). --------- Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Giles Cope <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <[email protected]>
-
- Oct 12, 2023
-
-
Tsvetomir Dimitrov authored
Exposes disabled validators list via a runtime API. --------- Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]>
-
- Oct 07, 2023
-
-
Muharem Ismailov authored
### Summary This PR introduces new dispatchables to the treasury pallet, allowing spends of various asset types. The enhanced features of the treasury pallet, in conjunction with the asset-rate pallet, are set up and enabled for Westend and Rococo. ### Westend and Rococo runtimes. Polkadot/Kusams/Rococo Treasury can accept proposals for `spends` of various asset kinds by specifying the asset's location and ID. #### Treasury Instance New Dispatchables: - `spend(AssetKind, AssetBalance, Beneficiary, Option<ValidFrom>)` - propose and approve a spend; - `payout(SpendIndex)` - payout an approved spend or retry a failed payout - `check_payment(SpendIndex)` - check the status of a payout; - `void_spend(SpendIndex)` - void previously approved spend; > existing spend dispatchable renamed to spend_local in this context, the `AssetKind` parameter contains the asset's location and it's corresponding `asset_id`, for example: `USDT` on `AssetHub`, ``` rust location = MultiLocation(0, X1(Parachain(1000))) asset_id = MultiLocation(0, X2(PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984))) ``` the `Beneficiary` parameter is a `MultiLocation` in the context of the asset's location, for example ``` rust // the Fellowship salary pallet's location / account FellowshipSalaryPallet = MultiLocation(1, X2(Parachain(1001), PalletInstance(64))) // or custom `AccountId` Alice = MultiLocation(0, AccountId32(network: None, id: [1,...])) ``` the `AssetBalance` represents the amount of the `AssetKind` to be transferred to the `Beneficiary`. For permission checks, the asset amount is converted to the native amount and compared against the maximum spendable amount determined by the commanding spend origin. the `spend` dispatchable allows for batching spends with different `ValidFrom` arguments, enabling milestone-based spending. If the expectations tied to an approved spend are not met, it is possible to void the spend later using the `void_spend` dispatchable. Asset Rate Pallet provides the conversion rate from the `AssetKind` to the native balance. #### Asset Rate Instance Dispatchables: - `create(AssetKind, Rate)` - initialize a conversion rate to the native balance for the given asset - `update(AssetKind, Rate)` - update the conversion rate to the native balance for the given asset - `remove(AssetKind)` - remove an existing conversion rate to the native balance for the given asset the pallet's dispatchables can be executed by the Root or Treasurer origins. ### Treasury Pallet Treasury Pallet can accept proposals for `spends` of various asset kinds and pay them out through the implementation of the `Pay` trait. New Dispatchables: - `spend(Config::AssetKind, AssetBalance, Config::Beneficiary, Option<ValidFrom>)` - propose and approve a spend; - `payout(SpendIndex)` - payout an approved spend or retry a failed payout; - `check_payment(SpendIndex)` - check the status of a payout; - `void_spend(SpendIndex)` - void previously approved spend; > existing spend dispatchable renamed to spend_local The parameters' types of the `spend` dispatchable exposed via the pallet's `Config` and allows to propose and accept a spend of a certain amount. An approved spend can be claimed via the `payout` within the `Config::SpendPeriod`. Clients provide an implementation of the `Pay` trait which can pay an asset of the `AssetKind` to the `Beneficiary` in `AssetBalance` units. The implementation of the Pay trait might not have an immediate final payment status, for example if implemented over `XCM` and the actual transfer happens on a remote chain. The `check_status` dispatchable can be executed to update the spend's payment state and retry the `payout` if the payment has failed. --------- Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Oct 01, 2023
-
-
Piet authored
What does this PR do? - Introduced the TotalValueLocked storage for nomination-pools. - introduced a slashing api in mock.rs - additional test for tracking a slashing event towards a pool without sub-pools - migration for the nomination-pools (V6 to V7) with `VersionedMigration` Why are these changes needed? this is the continuation of the work by @Kianenigma in this [PR](https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/13319) How were these changes implemented and what do they affect? - It's an extra StorageValue that's modified whenever funds flow in or out of staking for any of the `bonded_account` of `BondedPools` - The `PoolSlashed`event is now emitted even when no `SubPools` are found Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/155 KSM: HHEEgVzcqL3kCXgsxSfJMbsTy8dxoTctuXtpY94n4s8F4pS --------- Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ankan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ankan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Sep 29, 2023
-
-
Ankan authored
closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/158. partially addresses https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/226. Instead of fragile calculation of current balance by looking at `free balance - ED`, Nomination Pool now freezes ED in the pool reward account to restrict an account from going below minimum balance. This also has a nice side effect that if ED changes, we know how much is the imbalance in ED frozen in the pool and the current required ED. A pool operator can diligently top up the pool with the deficit in ED or vice versa, withdraw the excess they transferred to the pool. ## Notable changes - New call `adjust_pool_deposit`: Allows to top up the deficit or withdraw the excess deposited funds to the pool. - Uses Fungible trait (instead of Currency trait). Since NP was not doing any locking/reserving previously, no migration is needed for this. - One time migration of freezing ED from each of the existing pools (not very PoV friendly but fine for relay chain).
-
- Sep 27, 2023
-
-
Alejandro Martinez Andres authored
Migrating [PR from the archived polkadot repo](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7272) As per https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7272#issuecomment-1559240466, the changes in this MR include the following pallets into [x] Rococo and [x] Westend runtimes: pallet_conviction_voting pallet_referenda pallet_ranked_collective pallet_custom_origins pallet_whitelist And only for westend-runtime: pallet_treasury Following [Kusama runtime config](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/tree/dbae30efe080a1d41fe54ef4da8af47614c9ca93/runtime/kusama/src) as a baseline. Benchmarking of the following pallets done for both Rococo and Westend: pallet_conviction_voting pallet_referenda pallet_ranked_collective (only on Rococo) pallet_whitelist And only for Westend: pallet_treasury Removed Gov1 from Rococo as in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6701 Rococo Gov1 storage will be cleaned in a different PR - [issue ](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1618) --------- Co-authored-by: Giles Cope <[email protected]>
-