supersedes https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/pull/2873

Draft because of couple of TODOs:
- [x] fix remaining TODOs;
- [x] double check that all changes from
https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/pull/2873 are
correctly ported;
- [x] create a separate PR (on top of that one or a follow up?) for
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/tree/sv-try-new-bridge-fees;


- [x] fix compilation issues (haven't checked, but there should be
many).

---------

Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>

This PR adds [Rococo
People](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2281) <> [Rococo
Bulletin](https://github.com/zdave-parity/polkadot-bulletin-chain) to
the Rococo Bridge Hub code. There's a couple of things left to do here:
- [x] add remaining tests - it'd need some refactoring in the
`bridge-hub-test-utils` - will do in a separate PR;
- [x] actually run benchmarks for new messaging pallet (do we have bot
nowadays?).

The reason why I'm opening it before this ^^^ is ready, is that I'd like
to hear others opinion on how to deal with hacks with that bridge.
Initially I was assuming that Rococo Bulletin will be the 1:1 copy of
the Polkadot Bulletin (to avoid maintaining multiple
runtimes/releases/...), so you can see many `PolkadotBulletin` mentions
in this PR, even though we are going to bridge with the parallel chain
(`RococoBulletin`). That's because e.g. pallet names from
`construct_runtime` are affecting runtime storage keys and bridges are
using runtime storage proofs => it is important to use names that the
Bulletin chain expects.

But in the end, this hack won't work - we can't use Polkadot Bulletin
runtime to bridge with Rococo Bridge Hub, because Polkadot Bulletin
expects Polkadot Bridge hub to use `1002` parachain id and Rococo Bridge
Hub seats on the `1013`. This also affects storage keys using in
bridging, so I had to add the [`rococo`
feature](https://github.com/svyatonik/polkadot-bulletin-chain/blob/add-bridge-pallets/runtime/Cargo.toml#L198)
to the Bulletin chain. So now we can actually alter its runtime and
adapt it for Rococo.

So the question here is - what's better for us here
- to leave everything as is (seems hacky and non-trivial);
- change Bulletin chain runtime when `rococo` feature is used - e.g. use
proper names there (`WithPolkadotGrandpa` -> `WithRococoGrandpa`, ...)
- add another set of pallets to the Bulletin chain runtime to bridge
with Rococo and never use them in production. Similar to hack that we
had in Rococo/Wococo

cc @acatangiu @bkontur @serban300 

also cc @joepetrowski

 as the main "client" of this bridge

---

A couple words on how this bridge is different from the Rococo <>
Westend bridge:
- it is a bridge with a chain that uses GRANDPA finality, not the
parachain finality (hence the tests needs to be changed);
- it is a fee-free bridge. So
`AllowExplicitUnpaidExecutionFrom<Equals<SiblingPeople>>` + we are not
paying any rewards to relayers (apart from compensating transaction
costs).

---------

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Egor_P <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

Rococo<>Wococo bridge is replaced by Rococo<Westend bridge, so this PR
removes unneeded code.

- [x] update bridges subtree after
https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/pull/2692



---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Svyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]>

## Summary

Asset bridging support for AssetHub**Rococo** <-> AssetHub**Wococo** was
added [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1215), so
now we aim to bridge AssetHub**Rococo** and AssetHub**Westend**. (And
perhaps retire AssetHubWococo and the Wococo chains).

## Solution

**bridge-hub-westend-runtime**
- added new runtime as a copy of `bridge-hub-rococo-runtime`
- added support for bridging to `BridgeHubRococo`
- added tests and benchmarks

**bridge-hub-rococo-runtime**
- added support for bridging to `BridgeHubWestend`
- added tests and benchmarks
- internal refactoring by splitting bridge configuration per network,
e.g., `bridge_to_whatevernetwork_config.rs`.

**asset-hub-rococo-runtime**
- added support for asset bridging to `AssetHubWestend` (allows to
receive only WNDs)
- added new xcm router for `Westend`
- added tests and benchmarks

**asset-hub-westend-runtime**
- added support for asset bridging to `AssetHubRococo` (allows to
receive only ROCs)
- added new xcm router for `Rococo`
- added tests and benchmarks

## Deployment

All changes will be deployed as a part of
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1988.

## TODO

- [x] benchmarks for all pallet instances
- [x] integration tests
- [x] local run scripts


Relates to:
https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2602
Relates to: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1988



---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]>

This PR does not introduce any functional changes to the existing code,
it merely addresses several minor refactors:
- Moving bridging pallets to separate files.
- Improving the readability and naming of weight files for bridging
pallets and bridging pallet instances.

The reason for this refactor is to facilitate easier plugin integration
for the upcoming bridge between Rococo and Westend.

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>