Skip to content
  1. Apr 26, 2024
    • Tsvetomir Dimitrov's avatar
      Implementation of the new validator disabling strategy (#2226) · 988e30f1
      Tsvetomir Dimitrov authored
      Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1966,
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1963 and
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1962.
      
      Disabling strategy specification
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2955). (Updated
      13/02/2024)
      
      Implements:
      * validator disabling for a whole era instead of just a session
      * no more than 1/3 of the validators in the active set are disabled
      Removes:
      * `DisableStrategy` enum - now each validator committing an offence is
      disabled.
      * New era is not forced if too many validators are disabled.
      
      Before this PR not all offenders were disabled. A decision was made
      based on [`enum
      DisableStrategy`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/bbb66316/substrate/primitives/staking/src/offence.rs#L54).
      Some offenders were disabled for a whole era, some just for a session,
      some were not disabled at all.
      
      This PR changes the disabling behaviour. Now a validator committing an
      offense is disabled immediately till the end of the current era.
      
      Some implementation notes:
      * `OffendingValidators` in pallet session keeps all offenders (this is
      not changed). However its type is changed from `Vec<(u32, bool)>` to
      `Vec<u32>`. The reason is simple - each offender is getting disabled so
      the bool doesn't make sense anymore.
      * When a validator is disabled it is first added to
      `OffendingValidators` and then to `DisabledValidators`. This is done in
      [`add_offending_validator`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/bbb66316/substrate/frame/staking/src/slashing.rs#L325)
      from staking pallet.
      * In
      [`rotate_session`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/bdbe9829/substrate/frame/session/src/lib.rs#L623)
      the `end_session` also calls
      [`end_era`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/bbb66316/substrate/frame/staking/src/pallet/impls.rs#L490)
      when an era ends. In this case `OffendingValidators` are cleared
      **(1)**.
      * Then in
      [`rotate_session`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/bdbe9829/substrate/frame/session/src/lib.rs#L623)
      `DisabledValidators` are cleared **(2)**
      * And finally (still in `rotate_session`) a call to
      [`start_session`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/bbb66316
      
      /substrate/frame/staking/src/pallet/impls.rs#L430)
      repopulates the disabled validators **(3)**.
      * The reason for this complication is that session pallet knows nothing
      abut eras. To overcome this on each new session the disabled list is
      repopulated (points 2 and 3). Staking pallet knows when a new era starts
      so with point 1 it ensures that the offenders list is cleared.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarordian <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarordian <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarMaciej <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarGonçalo Pestana <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarKian Paimani <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAnkan <[email protected]>
      988e30f1
  2. Apr 10, 2024
    • PG Herveou's avatar
      Update benchmarking macros (#3934) · d38f6e67
      PG Herveou authored
      
      
      Current benchmarking macro returns a closure with the captured
      benchmarked code.
      This can cause issues when the benchmarked code has complex lifetime
      requirements.
      
      This PR updates the existing macro by injecting the recording parameter
      and invoking the start / stop method around the benchmarked block
      instead of returning a closure
      
      One other added benefit is that you can write this kind of code now as
      well:
      
      ```rust
      let v;
      #[block]
      { v = func.call(); }
      dbg!(v); // or assert something on v
      ```
      
      
      [Weights compare
      link](https://weights.tasty.limo/compare?unit=weight&ignore_errors=true&threshold=10&method=asymptotic&repo=polkadot-sdk&old=pg/fix-weights&new=pg/bench_update&path_pattern=substrate/frame/**/src/weights.rs,polkadot/runtime/*/src/weights/**/*.rs,polkadot/bridges/modules/*/src/weights.rs,cumulus/**/weights/*.rs,cumulus/**/weights/xcm/*.rs,cumulus/**/src/weights.rs)
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@pari...>
      d38f6e67
  3. Apr 09, 2024
  4. Apr 08, 2024
    • Oliver Tale-Yazdi's avatar
      [FRAME] Runtime Omni Bencher (#3512) · 9543d314
      Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
      This MR contains two major changes and some maintenance cleanup.  
      
      ## 1. Free Standing Pallet Benchmark Runner
      
      Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3045, depends
      on your runtime exposing the `GenesisBuilderApi` (like
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1492).
      
      Introduces a new binary crate: `frame-omni-bencher`.  
      It allows to directly benchmark a WASM blob - without needing a node or
      chain spec.
      
      This makes it much easier to generate pallet weights and should allow us
      to remove bloaty code from the node.
      It should work for all FRAME runtimes that dont use 3rd party host calls
      or non `BlakeTwo256` block hashing (basically all polkadot parachains
      should work).
      
      It is 100% backwards compatible with the old CLI args, when the `v1`
      compatibility command is used. This is done to allow for forwards
      compatible addition of new commands.
      
      ### Example (full example in the Rust docs)
      
      Installing the CLI:
      ```sh
      cargo install --locked --path subs...
      9543d314
  5. Apr 02, 2024
    • Serban Iorga's avatar
      Align dependencies with `parity-bridges-common` (#3937) · 8e95a3e1
      Serban Iorga authored
      Working towards migrating the `parity-bridges-common` repo inside
      `polkadot-sdk`. This PR upgrades some dependencies in order to align
      them with the versions used in `parity-bridges-common`
      
      Related to
      https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2538
      8e95a3e1
  6. Mar 26, 2024
    • Bastian Köcher's avatar
      westend: `SignedPhase` is a constant (#3646) · 0c15d887
      Bastian Köcher authored
      
      
      In preparation for the merkleized metadata, we need to ensure that
      constants are actually constant. If we want to test the unsigned phase
      we could for example just disable signed voter. Or we add some extra
      mechanism to the pallet to disable the signed phase from time to time.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAnkan <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarKian Paimani <[email protected]>
      0c15d887
    • Dcompoze's avatar
      Fix spelling mistakes across the whole repository (#3808) · 002d9260
      Dcompoze authored
      **Update:** Pushed additional changes based on the review comments.
      
      **This pull request fixes various spelling mistakes in this
      repository.**
      
      Most of the changes are contained in the first **3** commits:
      
      - `Fix spelling mistakes in comments and docs`
      
      - `Fix spelling mistakes in test names`
      
      - `Fix spelling mistakes in error messages, panic messages, logs and
      tracing`
      
      Other source code spelling mistakes are separated into individual
      commits for easier reviewing:
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'authority'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'prev_enqueud_messages'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'endpoint'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'children'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSiblingSovereignAccount'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSudoAccount'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'insufficient'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'PalletXcmExtrinsicsBenchmark'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'subtracted'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'CandidatePendingAvailability'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'exclusive'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'until'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'discriminator'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'nonexistent'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'subsystem'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'indices'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'committed'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'topology'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'response'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'beneficiary'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'formatted'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'UNKNOWN_PROOF_REQUEST'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'succeeded'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'reopened'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'proposer'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'InstantiationNonce'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'depositor'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'expiration'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'phantom'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'AggregatedKeyValue'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'randomness'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'defendant'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'AquaticMammal'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'transactions'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'PassingTracingSubscriber'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'TxSignaturePayload'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'versioning'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'descendant'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'overridden'`
      
      - `Fix the spelling of 'network'`
      
      Let me know if this structure is adequate.
      
      **Note:** The usage of the words `Merkle`, `Merkelize`, `Merklization`,
      `Merkelization`, `Merkleization`, is somewhat inconsistent but I left it
      as it is.
      
      ~~**Note:** In some places the term `Receival` is used to refer to
      message reception, IMO `Reception` is the correct word here, but I left
      it as it is.~~
      
      ~~**Note:** In some places the term `Overlayed` is used instead of the
      more acceptable version `Overlaid` but I also left it as it is.~~
      
      ~~**Note:** In some places the term `Applyable` is used instead of the
      correct version `Applicable` but I also left it as it is.~~
      
      **Note:** Some usage of British vs American english e.g. `judgement` vs
      `judgment`, `initialise` vs `initialize`, `optimise` vs `optimize` etc.
      are both present in different places, but I suppose that's
      understandable given the number of contributors.
      
      ~~**Note:** There is a spelling mistake in `.github/CODEOWNERS` but it
      triggers errors in CI when I make changes to it, so I left it as it
      is.~~
      002d9260
  7. Mar 15, 2024
  8. Mar 13, 2024
    • georgepisaltu's avatar
      Revert "FRAME: Create `TransactionExtension` as a replacement for... · bbd51ce8
      georgepisaltu authored
      
      Revert "FRAME: Create `TransactionExtension` as a replacement for `SignedExtension` (#2280)" (#3665)
      
      This PR reverts #2280 which introduced `TransactionExtension` to replace
      `SignedExtension`.
      
      As a result of the discussion
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3623#issuecomment-1986789700),
      the changes will be reverted for now with plans to reintroduce the
      concept in the future.
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
      bbd51ce8
  9. Mar 04, 2024
    • Gavin Wood's avatar
      FRAME: Create `TransactionExtension` as a replacement for `SignedExtension` (#2280) · fd5f9292
      Gavin Wood authored
      
      
      Closes #2160
      
      First part of [Extrinsic
      Horizon](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2415)
      
      Introduces a new trait `TransactionExtension` to replace
      `SignedExtension`. Introduce the idea of transactions which obey the
      runtime's extensions and have according Extension data (né Extra data)
      yet do not have hard-coded signatures.
      
      Deprecate the terminology of "Unsigned" when used for
      transactions/extrinsics owing to there now being "proper" unsigned
      transactions which obey the extension framework and "old-style" unsigned
      which do not. Instead we have __*General*__ for the former and
      __*Bare*__ for the latter. (Ultimately, the latter will be phased out as
      a type of transaction, and Bare will only be used for Inherents.)
      
      Types of extrinsic are now therefore:
      - Bare (no hardcoded signature, no Extra data; used to be known as
      "Unsigned")
      - Bare transactions (deprecated): Gossiped, validated with
      `ValidateUnsigned` (deprecated) and the `_bare_compat` bits of
      `TransactionExtension` (deprecated).
        - Inherents: Not gossiped, validated with `ProvideInherent`.
      - Extended (Extra data): Gossiped, validated via `TransactionExtension`.
        - Signed transactions (with a hardcoded signature).
        - General transactions (without a hardcoded signature).
      
      `TransactionExtension` differs from `SignedExtension` because:
      - A signature on the underlying transaction may validly not be present.
      - It may alter the origin during validation.
      - `pre_dispatch` is renamed to `prepare` and need not contain the checks
      present in `validate`.
      - `validate` and `prepare` is passed an `Origin` rather than a
      `AccountId`.
      - `validate` may pass arbitrary information into `prepare` via a new
      user-specifiable type `Val`.
      - `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to
      `Implicit`/`implicit`. It is encoded *for the entire transaction* and
      passed in to each extension as a new argument to `validate`. This
      facilitates the ability of extensions to acts as underlying crypto.
      
      There is a new `DispatchTransaction` trait which contains only default
      function impls and is impl'ed for any `TransactionExtension` impler. It
      provides several utility functions which reduce some of the tedium from
      using `TransactionExtension` (indeed, none of its regular functions
      should now need to be called directly).
      
      Three transaction version discriminator ("versions") are now
      permissible:
      - 0b000000100: Bare (used to be called "Unsigned"): contains Signature
      or Extra (extension data). After bare transactions are no longer
      supported, this will strictly identify an Inherents only.
      - 0b100000100: Old-school "Signed" Transaction: contains Signature and
      Extra (extension data).
      - 0b010000100: New-school "General" Transaction: contains Extra
      (extension data), but no Signature.
      
      For the New-school General Transaction, it becomes trivial for authors
      to publish extensions to the mechanism for authorizing an Origin, e.g.
      through new kinds of key-signing schemes, ZK proofs, pallet state,
      mutations over pre-authenticated origins or any combination of the
      above.
      
      ## Code Migration
      
      ### NOW: Getting it to build
      
      Wrap your `SignedExtension`s in `AsTransactionExtension`. This should be
      accompanied by renaming your aggregate type in line with the new
      terminology. E.g. Before:
      
      ```rust
      /// The SignedExtension to the basic transaction logic.
      pub type SignedExtra = (
      	/* snip */
      	MySpecialSignedExtension,
      );
      /// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime.
      pub type UncheckedExtrinsic =
      	generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, SignedExtra>;
      ```
      
      After:
      
      ```rust
      /// The extension to the basic transaction logic.
      pub type TxExtension = (
      	/* snip */
      	AsTransactionExtension<MySpecialSignedExtension>,
      );
      /// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime.
      pub type UncheckedExtrinsic =
      	generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, TxExtension>;
      ```
      
      You'll also need to alter any transaction building logic to add a
      `.into()` to make the conversion happen. E.g. Before:
      
      ```rust
      fn construct_extrinsic(
      		/* snip */
      ) -> UncheckedExtrinsic {
      	let extra: SignedExtra = (
      		/* snip */
      		MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */),
      	);
      	let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), extra.clone()).unwrap();
      	let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e));
      	UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed(
      		/* snip */
      		Signature::Sr25519(signature),
      		extra,
      	)
      }
      ```
      
      After:
      
      ```rust
      fn construct_extrinsic(
      		/* snip */
      ) -> UncheckedExtrinsic {
      	let tx_ext: TxExtension = (
      		/* snip */
      		MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */).into(),
      	);
      	let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), tx_ext.clone()).unwrap();
      	let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e));
      	UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed(
      		/* snip */
      		Signature::Sr25519(signature),
      		tx_ext,
      	)
      }
      ```
      
      ### SOON: Migrating to `TransactionExtension`
      
      Most `SignedExtension`s can be trivially converted to become a
      `TransactionExtension`. There are a few things to know.
      
      - Instead of a single trait like `SignedExtension`, you should now
      implement two traits individually: `TransactionExtensionBase` and
      `TransactionExtension`.
      - Weights are now a thing and must be provided via the new function `fn
      weight`.
      
      #### `TransactionExtensionBase`
      
      This trait takes care of anything which is not dependent on types
      specific to your runtime, most notably `Call`.
      
      - `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to
      `Implicit`/`implicit`.
      - Weight must be returned by implementing the `weight` function. If your
      extension is associated with a pallet, you'll probably want to do this
      via the pallet's existing benchmarking infrastructure.
      
      #### `TransactionExtension`
      
      Generally:
      - `pre_dispatch` is now `prepare` and you *should not reexecute the
      `validate` functionality in there*!
      - You don't get an account ID any more; you get an origin instead. If
      you need to presume an account ID, then you can use the trait function
      `AsSystemOriginSigner::as_system_origin_signer`.
      - You get an additional ticket, similar to `Pre`, called `Val`. This
      defines data which is passed from `validate` into `prepare`. This is
      important since you should not be duplicating logic from `validate` to
      `prepare`, you need a way of passing your working from the former into
      the latter. This is it.
      - This trait takes two type parameters: `Call` and `Context`. `Call` is
      the runtime call type which used to be an associated type; you can just
      move it to become a type parameter for your trait impl. `Context` is not
      currently used and you can safely implement over it as an unbounded
      type.
      - There's no `AccountId` associated type any more. Just remove it.
      
      Regarding `validate`:
      - You get three new parameters in `validate`; all can be ignored when
      migrating from `SignedExtension`.
      - `validate` returns a tuple on success; the second item in the tuple is
      the new ticket type `Self::Val` which gets passed in to `prepare`. If
      you use any information extracted during `validate` (off-chain and
      on-chain, non-mutating) in `prepare` (on-chain, mutating) then you can
      pass it through with this. For the tuple's last item, just return the
      `origin` argument.
      
      Regarding `prepare`:
      - This is renamed from `pre_dispatch`, but there is one change:
      - FUNCTIONALITY TO VALIDATE THE TRANSACTION NEED NOT BE DUPLICATED FROM
      `validate`!!
      - (This is different to `SignedExtension` which was required to run the
      same checks in `pre_dispatch` as in `validate`.)
      
      Regarding `post_dispatch`:
      - Since there are no unsigned transactions handled by
      `TransactionExtension`, `Pre` is always defined, so the first parameter
      is `Self::Pre` rather than `Option<Self::Pre>`.
      
      If you make use of `SignedExtension::validate_unsigned` or
      `SignedExtension::pre_dispatch_unsigned`, then:
      - Just use the regular versions of these functions instead.
      - Have your logic execute in the case that the `origin` is `None`.
      - Ensure your transaction creation logic creates a General Transaction
      rather than a Bare Transaction; this means having to include all
      `TransactionExtension`s' data.
      - `ValidateUnsigned` can still be used (for now) if you need to be able
      to construct transactions which contain none of the extension data,
      however these will be phased out in stage 2 of the Transactions Horizon,
      so you should consider moving to an extension-centric design.
      
      ## TODO
      
      - [x] Introduce `CheckSignature` impl of `TransactionExtension` to
      ensure it's possible to have crypto be done wholly in a
      `TransactionExtension`.
      - [x] Deprecate `SignedExtension` and move all uses in codebase to
      `TransactionExtension`.
        - [x] `ChargeTransactionPayment`
        - [x] `DummyExtension`
        - [x] `ChargeAssetTxPayment` (asset-tx-payment)
        - [x] `ChargeAssetTxPayment` (asset-conversion-tx-payment)
        - [x] `CheckWeight`
        - [x] `CheckTxVersion`
        - [x] `CheckSpecVersion`
        - [x] `CheckNonce`
        - [x] `CheckNonZeroSender`
        - [x] `CheckMortality`
        - [x] `CheckGenesis`
        - [x] `CheckOnlySudoAccount`
        - [x] `WatchDummy`
        - [x] `PrevalidateAttests`
        - [x] `GenericSignedExtension`
        - [x] `SignedExtension` (chain-polkadot-bulletin)
        - [x] `RefundSignedExtensionAdapter`
      - [x] Implement `fn weight` across the board.
      - [ ] Go through all pre-existing extensions which assume an account
      signer and explicitly handle the possibility of another kind of origin.
      - [x] `CheckNonce` should probably succeed in the case of a non-account
      origin.
      - [x] `CheckNonZeroSender` should succeed in the case of a non-account
      origin.
      - [x] `ChargeTransactionPayment` and family should fail in the case of a
      non-account origin.
        - [ ] 
      - [x] Fix any broken tests.
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandru Vasile <[email protected]>
      Signed-off-by: default avatardependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarNikhil Gupta <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarChevdor <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarMaciej <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJavier Viola <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarMarcin S. <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarTsvetomir Dimitrov <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJavier Bullrich <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarKoute <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAdrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: Vladimir Istyufeev's avatarVladimir Istyufeev <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarRoss Bulat <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarGonçalo Pestana <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarLiam Aharon <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarSvyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAndré Silva <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatars0me0ne-unkn0wn <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarordian <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarSebastian Kunert <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAaro Altonen <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDmitry Markin <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexandru Vasile <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexander Samusev <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJulian Eager <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarMichal Kucharczyk <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDavide Galassi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDónal Murray <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avataryjh <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarTom Mi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatardependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarWill | Paradox | ParaNodes.io <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJoshy Orndorff <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJoshy Orndorff <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarPG Herveou <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexander Theißen <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarKian Paimani <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJuan Girini <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarbader y <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJames Wilson <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarjoe petrowski <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarasynchronous rob <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarParth <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAndrew Jones <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJonathan Udd <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarSerban Iorga <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarEgor_P <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBranislav Kontur <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarEvgeny Snitko <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJust van Stam <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatargupnik <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatardzmitry-lahoda <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarzhiqiangxu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarNazar Mokrynskyi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAnwesh <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarcheme <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarSam Johnson <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarkianenigma <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJegor Sidorenko <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarMuharem <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarjoepetrowski <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAlexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarGabriel Facco de Arruda <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarSquirrel <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarAndrei Sandu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      fd5f9292
  10. Feb 28, 2024
    • Liam Aharon's avatar
      Runtime Upgrade ref docs and Single Block Migration example pallet (#1554) · 12ce4f7d
      Liam Aharon authored
      Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/55
      
      - Changes 'current storage version' terminology to less ambiguous
      'in-code storage version' (suggestion by @ggwpez
      
      )
      - Adds a new example pallet `pallet-example-single-block-migrations`
      - Adds a new reference doc to replace
      https://docs.substrate.io/maintain/runtime-upgrades/ (temporarily living
      in the pallet while we wait for developer hub PR to merge)
      - Adds documentation for the `storage_alias` macro
      - Improves `trait Hooks` docs 
      - Improves `trait GetStorageVersion` docs
      - Update the suggested patterns for using `VersionedMigration`, so that
      version unchecked migrations are never exported
      - Prevents accidental usage of version unchecked migrations in runtimes
      
      https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/14421#discussion_r1255467895
      - Unversioned migration code is kept inside `mod version_unchecked`,
      versioned code is kept in `pub mod versioned`
      - It is necessary to use modules to limit visibility because the inner
      migration must be `pub`. See
      https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/30905 and
      
      https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/lang-team-minutes-private-in-public-rules/4504/40
      for more.
      
      ### todo
      
      - [x] move to reference docs to proper place within sdk-docs (now that
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2102 is merged)
      - [x] prdoc
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarKian Paimani <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJuan <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatargupnik <[email protected]>
      12ce4f7d
  11. Feb 12, 2024
    • Oliver Tale-Yazdi's avatar
      Lift dependencies to the workspace (Part 1) (#2070) · e80c2473
      Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
      Changes (partial https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/994):
      - Set log to `0.4.20` everywhere
      - Lift `log` to the workspace
      
      Starting with a simpler one after seeing
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2065 from @jsdw
      
      .
      This sets the `default-features` to `false` in the root and then
      overwrites that in each create to its original value. This is necessary
      since otherwise the `default` features are additive and its impossible
      to disable them in the crate again once they are enabled in the
      workspace.
      
      I am using a tool to do this, so its mostly a test to see that it works
      as expected.
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      e80c2473
  12. Feb 08, 2024
    • Gonçalo Pestana's avatar
      Fixes `TotalValueLocked` out of sync in nomination pools (#3052) · aac07af0
      Gonçalo Pestana authored
      The `TotalLockedValue` storage value in nomination pools pallet may get
      out of sync if the staking pallet does implicit withdrawal of unlocking
      chunks belonging to a bonded pool stash. This fix is based on a new
      method in the `OnStakingUpdate` traits, `on_withdraw`, which allows the
      nomination pools pallet to adjust the `TotalLockedValue` every time
      there is an implicit or explicit withdrawal from a bonded pool's stash.
      
      This PR also adds a migration that checks and updates the on-chain TVL
      if it got out of sync due to the bug this PR fixes.
      
      **Changes to `trait OnStakingUpdate`**
      
      In order for staking to notify the nomination pools pallet that chunks
      where withdrew, we add a new method, `on_withdraw` to the
      `OnStakingUpdate` trait. The nomination pools pallet filters the
      withdraws that are related to bonded pool accounts and updates the
      `TotalValueLocked` accordingly.
      
      **Others**
      - Adds try-state checks to the EPM/staking e2e tests
      - Adds tests for auto withdrawing in the context of nomination pools
      
      **To-do**
      - [x] check if we need a migration to fix the current `TotalValueLocked`
      (run try-runtime)
      - [x] migrations to fix the current on-chain TVL value 
      
        **Kusama**:
      ```
      TotalValueLocked: 99.4559 kKSM
      TotalValueLocked (calculated) 99.4559 kKSM
      ```
      
      
      ️ **Westend**:
      ```
      TotalValueLocked: 18.4060 kWND
      TotalValueLocked (calculated) 18.4050 kWND
      ```
      **Polkadot**: TVL not released yet.
      
      Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3055
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarRoss Bulat <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDónal Murray <[email protected]>
      aac07af0
  13. Feb 06, 2024
    • Squirrel's avatar
      sp-std -> core (#3199) · bc2e5e1f
      Squirrel authored
      First in a series of PRs that reduces our use of sp-std with a view to
      deprecating it.
      
      This is just looking at /substrate and moving some of the references
      from `sp-std` to `core`.
      These particular changes should be uncontroversial.
      
      Where macros are used `::core` should be used to remove any ambiguity.
      
      part of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2101
      bc2e5e1f
  14. Jan 31, 2024
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      [frame] `#[pallet::composite_enum]` improved variant count handling + removed... · bb8ddc46
      Branislav Kontur authored
      [frame] `#[pallet::composite_enum]` improved variant count handling + removed `pallet_balances`'s `MaxHolds` config (#2657)
      
      I started this investigation/issue based on @liamaharon
      
       question
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1801#discussion_r1410452499).
      
      ## Problem
      
      The `pallet_balances` integrity test should correctly detect that the
      runtime has correct distinct `HoldReasons` variant count. I assume the
      same situation exists for RuntimeFreezeReason.
      
      It is not a critical problem, if we set `MaxHolds` with a sufficiently
      large value, everything should be ok. However, in this case, the
      integrity_test check becomes less useful.
      
      **Situation for "any" runtime:**
      - `HoldReason` enums from different pallets:
      ```rust
              /// from pallet_nis
              #[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason {
      		NftReceipt,
      	}
      
              /// from pallet_preimage
              #[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason {
      		Preimage,
      	}
      
              // from pallet_state-trie-migration
              #[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason {
      		SlashForContinueMigrate,
      		SlashForMigrateCustomTop,
      		SlashForMigrateCustomChild,
      	}
      ```
      
      - generated `RuntimeHoldReason` enum looks like:
      ```rust
      pub enum RuntimeHoldReason {
      
          #[codec(index = 32u8)]
          Preimage(pallet_preimage::HoldReason),
      
          #[codec(index = 38u8)]
          Nis(pallet_nis::HoldReason),
      
          #[codec(index = 42u8)]
          StateTrieMigration(pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason),
      }
      ```
      
      - composite enum `RuntimeHoldReason` variant count is detected as `3`
      - we set `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>`
      - `pallet_balances::integrity_test` is ok with `3`(at least 3)
      
      However, the real problem can occur in a live runtime where some
      functionality might stop working. This is due to a total of 5 distinct
      hold reasons (for pallets with multi-instance support, it is even more),
      and not all of them can be used because of an incorrect `MaxHolds`,
      which is deemed acceptable according to the `integrity_test`:
        ```
        // pseudo-code - if we try to call all of these:
      
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_nis::HoldReason::NftReceipt.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_preimage::HoldReason::Preimage.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
      
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForContinueMigrate.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
      
        // With `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>` these two will fail
      
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomTop.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
      
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomChild.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
        ```  
      
      
      ## Solutions
      
      A macro `#[pallet::*]` expansion is extended of `VariantCount`
      implementation for the `#[pallet::composite_enum]` enum type. This
      expansion generates the `VariantCount` implementation for pallets'
      `HoldReason`, `FreezeReason`, `LockId`, and `SlashReason`. Enum variants
      must be plain enum values without fields to ensure a deterministic
      count.
      
      The composite runtime enum, `RuntimeHoldReason` and
      `RuntimeFreezeReason`, now sets `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT` as the sum
      of pallets' enum `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT`:
      ```rust
      #[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)]
      mod module_single_instance {
      
      	#[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason {
      		ModuleSingleInstanceReason1,
      		ModuleSingleInstanceReason2,
      	}
      ...
      }
      
      #[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)]
      mod module_multi_instance {
      
      	#[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason<I: 'static = ()> {
      		ModuleMultiInstanceReason1,
      		ModuleMultiInstanceReason2,
      		ModuleMultiInstanceReason3,
      	}
      ...
      }
      
      
      impl self::sp_api_hidden_includes_construct_runtime::hidden_include::traits::VariantCount
          for RuntimeHoldReason
      {
          const VARIANT_COUNT: u32 = 0
              + module_single_instance::HoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT
              + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance1>::VARIANT_COUNT
              + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance2>::VARIANT_COUNT
              + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance3>::VARIANT_COUNT;
      }
      ```
      
      In addition, `MaxHolds` is removed (as suggested
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2657#discussion_r1443324573))
      from `pallet_balances`, and its `Holds` are now bounded to
      `RuntimeHoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT`. Therefore, there is no need to let
      the runtime specify `MaxHolds`.
      
      
      ## For reviewers
      
      Relevant changes can be found here:
      - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/lib.rs` 
      -  `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/parse/composite.rs`
      -  `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/expand/composite.rs`
      -
      `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/composite_helper.rs`
      -
      `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/hold_reason.rs`
      -
      `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/freeze_reason.rs`
      - `substrate/frame/support/src/traits/misc.rs`
      
      And the rest of the files is just about removed `MaxHolds` from
      `pallet_balances`
      
      ## Next steps
      
      Do the same for `MaxFreezes`
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2997.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDónal Murray <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatargupnik <[email protected]>
      bb8ddc46
  15. Jan 26, 2024
  16. Jan 22, 2024
  17. Dec 18, 2023
  18. Dec 15, 2023
    • Ankan's avatar
      [NPoS] Remove better solution threshold for unsigned submissions (#2694) · ffb2125f
      Ankan authored
      closes https://github.com/paritytech-secops/srlabs_findings/issues/78.
      
      Removes `BetterUnsignedThreshold` from pallet EPM. This will essentially
      mean any solution submitted by the validator that is strictly better
      than the current queued solution would be accepted.
      
      The reason for having these thresholds is to limit number of solutions
      submitted on-chain. However for unsigned submissions, the number of
      solutions that could be submitted on average is limited even without
      thresholding (calculation shown in the corresponding issue).
      ffb2125f
  19. Dec 13, 2023
  20. Dec 12, 2023
    • Ross Bulat's avatar
      Staking: Add `deprecate_controller_batch` AdminOrigin call (#2589) · 048a9c27
      Ross Bulat authored
      
      
      Partially Addresses #2500
      
      Adds a `deprecate_controller_batch` call to the staking pallet that is
      callable by `Root` and `StakingAdmin`. To be used for controller account
      deprecation and removed thereafter. Adds
      `MaxControllersDeprecationBatch` pallet constant that defines max
      possible deprecations per call.
      
      - [x] Add `deprecate_controller_batch` call, and
      `MaxControllersInDeprecationBatch` constant.
      - [x] Add tests, benchmark, weights. Tests that weight is only consumed
      if unique pair.
      - [x] Adds `StakingAdmin` origin to staking's `AdminOrigin` type in
      westend runtime.
      - [x] Determined that worst case 5,900 deprecations does fit into
      `maxBlock` `proofSize` and `refTime` in both normal and operational
      thresholds, meaning we can deprecate all controllers for each network in
      one call.
      
      ## Block Weights
      
      By querying `consts.system.blockWeights` we can see that the
      `deprecate_controller_batch` weights fit within the `normal` threshold
      on Polkadot.
      
      #### `controller_deprecation_batch` where i = 5900:
      #### Ref time: 69,933,325,300
      #### Proof size: 21,040,390
      
      ### Polkadot 
      
      ```
      // consts.query.blockWeights
      
      maxBlock: {
              refTime: 2,000,000,000,000
              proofSize: 18,446,744,073,709,551,615
      }
      normal: {
       maxExtrinsic: {
      	refTime: 1,479,873,955,000
      	proofSize: 13,650,590,614,545,068,195
       }
       maxTotal: {
      	refTime: 1,500,000,000,000
      	proofSize: 13,835,058,055,282,163,711
       }
      }
      ```
      
      ### Kusama
      
      ```
      // consts.query.blockWeights
      
        maxBlock: {
          refTime: 2,000,000,000,000
          proofSize: 18,446,744,073,709,551,615
        }
          normal: {
            maxExtrinsic: {
              refTime: 1,479,875,294,000
              proofSize: 13,650,590,614,545,068,195
            }
            maxTotal: {
              refTime: 1,500,000,000,000
              proofSize: 13,835,058,055,282,163,711
            }
      }
      ```
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarGonçalo Pestana <[email protected]>
      048a9c27
  21. Dec 01, 2023
  22. Nov 30, 2023
    • Kian Paimani's avatar
      Introduce Polkadot-Sdk `developer_hub` (#2102) · eaf1bc56
      Kian Paimani authored
      
      
      This PR introduces the new crate `developer_hub` into the polkadot-sdk
      repo. The vision for the developer-hub crate is detailed in [this
      document](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XLLkFNE8v8HLvZpI2rzsa8N2IN1FcKntc8q-Sc4xBAk/edit?usp=sharing).
      
      <img width="1128" alt="Screenshot 2023-11-02 at 10 45 48"
      src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/5588131/1e12b60f-fef5-42c4-8503-a3ba234077c3">
      
      
      Other than adding the new crate, it also does the following: 
      
      * Remove the `substrate` crate, as there is now a unique umbrella crate
      for multiple things in `developer_hub::polkadot_sdk`.
      * (backport candidate) A minor change to `frame-support` macros that
      allows `T::RuntimeOrigin` to also be acceptable as the origin type.
      * (backport candidate) A minor change to `frame-system` that allows us
      to deposit events at genesis because now the real genesis config is
      generated via wasm, and we can safely assume `cfg!(feature = "std")`
      means only testing. related to #62.
      * (backport candidate) Introduces a small `read_events_for_pallet` to
      `frame_system` for easier event reading in tests.
      * From https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/31, it
      takes action on improving the `pallet::call` docs.
      * From https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/31, it
      takes action on improving the `UncheckedExtrinsic` docs.
      
      ## Way Forward
      
      First, a version of this is deployed temporarily
      [here](https://blog.kianenigma.nl/polkadot-sdk/developer_hub/index.html).
      I will keep it up to date on a daily basis.
      
      ### This Pull Request
      
      I see two ways forward: 
      
      1. We acknowledge that everything in `developer-hub` is going to be WIP,
      and merge this asap. We should not yet use links to this crate anywhere.
      2. We make this be the feature branch, make PRs against this, and either
      gradually backport it, or only merge to master once it is done.
      
      I am personally in favor of option 1. If we stick to option 2, we need a
      better way to deploy a staging version of this to gh-pages.
      
      ### Issue Tracking
      
      The main issues related to the future of `developer_hub` are: 
      
      - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/31
      - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/4
      - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/26 
      - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/32
      - https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk-docs/issues/36
      
      
      ### After This Pull Request
      
      - [ ] create a redirect for
      https://paritytech.github.io/polkadot-sdk/master/substrate/
      - [x] analytics 
      - [ ] link checker
      - [ ] the matter of publishing, and how all of these relative links for
      when we do, that is still an open question. There is section on this in
      the landing page.
      - [ ] updated https://paritytech.github.io/
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarLiam Aharon <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJuan Girini <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarbader y <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarSebastian Kunert <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJames Wilson <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarMichal Kucharczyk <[email protected]>
      eaf1bc56
  23. Nov 28, 2023
  24. Nov 01, 2023
    • Ankan's avatar
      [NPoS] Paging reward payouts in order to scale rewardable nominators (#1189) · 00b85c51
      Ankan authored
      
      
      helps https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/439.
      closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/473.
      
      PR link in the older substrate repository:
      https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/13498.
      
      # Context
      Rewards payout is processed today in a single block and limited to
      `MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator`. This number is currently 512 on both
      Kusama and Polkadot.
      
      This PR tries to scale the nominators payout to an unlimited count in a
      multi-block fashion. Exposures are stored in pages, with each page
      capped to a certain number (`MaxExposurePageSize`). Starting out, this
      number would be the same as `MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator`, but
      eventually, this number can be lowered through new runtime upgrades to
      limit the rewardeable nominators per dispatched call instruction.
      
      The changes in the PR are backward compatible.
      
      ## How payouts would work like after this change
      Staking exposes two calls, 1) the existing `payout_stakers` and 2)
      `payout_stakers_by_page`.
      
      ### payout_stakers
      This remains backward compatible with no signature change. If for a
      given era a validator has multiple pages, they can call `payout_stakers`
      multiple times. The pages are executed in an ascending sequence and the
      runtime takes care of preventing double claims.
      
      ### payout_stakers_by_page
      Very similar to `payout_stakers` but also accepts an extra param
      `page_index`. An account can choose to payout rewards only for an
      explicitly passed `page_index`.
      
      **Lets look at an example scenario**
      Given an active validator on Kusama had 1100 nominators,
      `MaxExposurePageSize` set to 512 for Era e. In order to pay out rewards
      to all nominators, the caller would need to call `payout_stakers` 3
      times.
      
      - `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the first 512
      nominators.
      - `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the second set of 512
      nominators.
      - `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => will pay the last set of 76
      nominators.
      ...
      - `payout_stakers(origin, stash, e)` => calling it the 4th time would
      return an error `InvalidPage`.
      
      The above calls can also be replaced by `payout_stakers_by_page` and
      passing a `page_index` explicitly.
      
      ## Commission note
      Validator commission is paid out in chunks across all the pages where
      each commission chunk is proportional to the total stake of the current
      page. This implies higher the total stake of a page, higher will be the
      commission. If all the pages of a validator's single era are paid out,
      the sum of commission paid to the validator across all pages should be
      equal to what the commission would have been if we had a non-paged
      exposure.
      
      ### Migration Note
      Strictly speaking, we did not need to bump our storage version since
      there is no migration of storage in this PR. But it is still useful to
      mark a storage upgrade for the following reasons:
      
      - New storage items are introduced in this PR while some older storage
      items are deprecated.
      - For the next `HistoryDepth` eras, the exposure would be incrementally
      migrated to its corresponding paged storage item.
      - Runtimes using staking pallet would strictly need to wait at least
      `HistoryDepth` eras with current upgraded version (14) for the migration
      to complete. At some era `E` such that `E >
      era_at_which_V14_gets_into_effect + HistoryDepth`, we will upgrade to
      version X which will remove the deprecated storage items.
      In other words, it is a strict requirement that E<sub>x</sub> -
      E<sub>14</sub> > `HistoryDepth`, where
      E<sub>x</sub> = Era at which deprecated storages are removed from
      runtime,
      E<sub>14</sub> = Era at which runtime is upgraded to version 14.
      - For Polkadot and Kusama, there is a [tracker
      ticket](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/433) to clean
      up the deprecated storage items.
      
      ### Storage Changes
      
      #### Added
      - ErasStakersOverview
      - ClaimedRewards
      - ErasStakersPaged
      
      #### Deprecated
      The following can be cleaned up after 84 eras which is tracked
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/433).
      
      - ErasStakers.
      - ErasStakersClipped.
      - StakingLedger.claimed_rewards, renamed to
      StakingLedger.legacy_claimed_rewards.
      
      ### Config Changes
      - Renamed MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator to MaxExposurePageSize.
      
      ### TODO
      - [x] Tracker ticket for cleaning up the old code after 84 eras.
      - [x] Add companion.
      - [x] Redo benchmarks before merge.
      - [x] Add Changelog for pallet_staking.
      - [x] Pallet should be configurable to enable/disable paged rewards.
      - [x] Commission payouts are distributed across pages.
      - [x] Review documentation thoroughly.
      - [x] Rename `MaxNominatorRewardedPerValidator` ->
      `MaxExposurePageSize`.
      - [x] NMap for `ErasStakersPaged`.
      - [x] Deprecate ErasStakers.
      - [x] Integrity tests.
      
      ### Followup issues
      [Runtime api for deprecated ErasStakers storage
      item](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/426)
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJavier Viola <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarRoss Bulat <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      00b85c51
  25. Oct 24, 2023
    • Kian Paimani's avatar
      Ensure correct variant count in `Runtime[Hold/Freeze]Reason` (#1900) · 35eb133b
      Kian Paimani authored
      
      
      closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1882
      
      ## Breaking Changes
      
      This PR introduces a new item to `pallet_balances::Config`:
      
      ```diff
      trait Config {
      ++    type RuntimeFreezeReasons;
      }
      ```
      
      This value is only used to check it against `type MaxFreeze`. A similar
      check has been added for `MaxHolds` against `RuntimeHoldReasons`, which
      is already given to `pallet_balances`.
      
      In all contexts, you should pass the real `RuntimeFreezeReasons`
      generated by `construct_runtime` to `type RuntimeFreezeReasons`. Passing
      `()` would also work, but it would imply that the runtime uses no
      freezes at all.
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      35eb133b
  26. Oct 20, 2023
    • Bastian Köcher's avatar
      `xcm`: Change `TypeInfo::path` to not include `staging` (#1948) · f3bf5c1a
      Bastian Köcher authored
      
      
      The `xcm` crate was renamed to `staging-xcm` to be able to publish it to
      crates.io as someone as squatted `xcm`. The problem with this rename is
      that the `TypeInfo` includes the crate name which ultimately lands in
      the metadata. The metadata is consumed by downstream users like
      `polkadot-js` or people building on top of `polkadot-js`. These people
      are using the entire `path` to find the type in the type registry. Thus,
      their code would break as the type path would now be [`staging_xcm`,
      `VersionedXcm`] instead of [`xcm`, `VersionedXcm`]. This pull request
      fixes this by renaming the path segment `staging_xcm` to `xcm`.
      
      This requires: https://github.com/paritytech/scale-info/pull/197
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarFrancisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
      f3bf5c1a
  27. Oct 15, 2023
    • Gonçalo Pestana's avatar
      Refactor staking ledger (#1484) · 8ee4042c
      Gonçalo Pestana authored
      This PR refactors the staking ledger logic to encapsulate all reads and
      mutations of `Ledger`, `Bonded`, `Payee` and stake locks within the
      `StakingLedger` struct implementation.
      
      With these changes, all the reads and mutations to the `Ledger`, `Payee`
      and `Bonded` storage map should be done through the methods exposed by
      StakingLedger to ensure the data and lock consistency of the operations.
      The new introduced methods that mutate and read Ledger are:
      
      - `ledger.update()`: inserts/updates a staking ledger in storage;
      updates staking locks accordingly (and ledger.bond(), which is synthatic
      sugar for ledger.update())
      - `ledger.kill()`: removes all Bonded and StakingLedger related data for
      a given ledger; updates staking locks accordingly;
      `StakingLedger::get(account)`: queries both the `Bonded` and `Ledger`
      storages and returns a `Option<StakingLedger>`. The pallet impl exposes
      fn ledger(account) as synthatic sugar for `StakingLedger::get(account)`.
      
      Retrieving a ledger with `StakingLedger::get()` can be done by providing
      either a stash or controller account. The input must be wrapped in a
      `StakingAccount` variant (Stash or Controller) which is treated
      accordingly. This simplifies the caller API but will eventually be
      deprecated once we completely get rid of the controller account in
      staking. However, this refactor will help with the work necessary when
      completely removing the controller.
      
      Other goals:
      
      - No logical changes have been introduced in this PR;
      - No breaking changes or updates in wallets required;
      - No new storage items or need to perform storage migrations;
      - Centralise the changes to bonds and ledger updates to simplify the
      OnStakingUpdate updates to the target list (related to
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/443)
      
      Note: it would be great to prevent or at least raise a warning if
      `Ledger<T>`, `Payee<T>` and `Bonded<T>` storage types are accessed
      outside the `StakingLedger` implementation. This PR should not get
      blocked by that feature, but there's a tracking issue here
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/149
      
      Related and step towards
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/443
      8ee4042c
  28. Oct 01, 2023
  29. Sep 22, 2023
  30. Sep 18, 2023
    • Gonçalo Pestana's avatar
      Implements a variable deposit base calculation for EPM signed submissions (#1547) · 614aa31b
      Gonçalo Pestana authored
      **Note**: This is a lift-and-shift PR from the old substrate and
      polkadot repos, both PRs have been reviewed and audited
      (https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/13983,
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7140)
      
      ---
      
      This PR implements a generic `BaseDeposit` calculation for signed
      submissions, based on the size of the submission queue.
      
      It adds a new associated type to EPM's config, `type SignedDepositBase`,
      that implements `Convert<usize, BalanceOf<T>>`, which is used to
      calculate the base deposit for signed submissions based on the size of
      the signed submissions queue.
      
      `struct GeometricDepositBase<Balance, Fixed, Inc>` implements the
      convert trait so that the deposit value increases as a geometric
      progression. The deposit base is calculated by `deposit_base =
      fixed_deposit_base * (1 + increase_factor)^n`, where `n` is the term of
      the progression (i.e. the number of signed submissions in the queue).
      `Fixed` and `Inc` generic params are getters for `Balance` and
      `IncreaseFactor` to compute the geometric progression. If
      `IncreaseFactor = 0`, then the signed deposit is constant and equal to
      `Fixed` regardless of the size of the queue.
      
      ### Runtime configs
      
      In Kusama, the progression with 10% increase without changing the
      current signed fixed deposit is: (term == size of the queue)
      
      Term 1: `1,333,333,332,000`
      Term 2: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10 = 1,466,666,665,200`
      Term 3: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^2 = 1,613,333,331,200`
      Term 4: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^3 = 1,774,666,664,320`
      Term 5: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^4 = 1,952,133,330,752`
      Term 6: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^5 = 2,147,346,663,827.20`
      Term 7: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^6 = 2,362,081,330,210.92`
      Term 8: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^7 = 2,598,289,463,231.01`
      Term 9: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^8 = 2,858,118,409,554.11`
      Term 10: `1,333,333,332,000 * 1.10^9 = 3,143,930,250,509.52`
      
      Westend:
      
      Term 1: `2,000,000,000,000`
      Term 2: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10 = 2,200,000,000,000`
      Term 3: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^2 = 2,420,000,000,000`
      Term 4: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^3 = 2,662,000,000,000`
      Term 5: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^4 = 2,928,200,000,000`
      Term 6: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^5 = 3,221,020,000,000`
      Term 7: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^6 = 3,543,122,000,000`
      Term 8: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^7 = 3,897,434,200,000`
      Term 9: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^8 = 4,287,177,620,000`
      Term 10: `2,000,000,000,000 * 1.10^9 = 4,715,895,382,000`
      
      and in Polkadot, the deposit increase is disabled in the current state
      of the PR, as the increase factor is 0% -- so nothing changes from the
      current behaviour.
      
      Closes https://github.com/paritytech-secops/srlabs_findings/issues/189
      614aa31b
  31. Sep 11, 2023
  32. Aug 31, 2023
  33. Aug 30, 2023
  34. Aug 29, 2023
  35. Aug 28, 2023
  36. Aug 25, 2023
  37. Aug 24, 2023
    • juangirini's avatar
      Restructure `frame_benchmarking` macro related exports (#14787) · bc2b3d9d
      juangirini authored
      
      
      * make reexports private
      
      * make reexports private 2
      
      * make reexports private for runtime-benchmarking
      
      * make reexports private for try-runtime
      
      * fix for try-runtime
      
      * make reexports private for tests
      
      * fmt
      
      * make reexports private for tests
      
      * make reexports private for experimental
      
      * fix beefy
      
      * fix ui test
      
      * fix ui test
      
      * fix benches
      
      * ".git/.scripts/commands/fmt/fmt.sh"
      
      * fix contracts use
      
      * wip
      
      * wip
      
      * do not reexport sp_api::metadata_ir
      
      * fix CI checks
      
      * fix support tests
      
      * ".git/.scripts/commands/fmt/fmt.sh"
      
      * Update frame/support/src/lib.rs
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      
      * import codec directly
      
      * fmt
      
      * wip
      
      * wip
      
      * remove benchmarking private exports
      
      * fix zepter warning
      
      * fix imports
      
      * partially fix node-cli tests
      
      * fix node-cli tests
      
      * fix node-cli build
      
      * fix zepter warning
      
      * fix test
      
      * fix ui test
      
      * fix ci
      
      * remove unnecessary imports
      
      * add import back
      
      * add import back
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      bc2b3d9d