Initial implementation for the plan discussed here: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/701
Built on top of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1178
v0: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7554,

## Overall idea

When approval-voting checks a candidate and is ready to advertise the
approval, defer it in a per-relay chain block until we either have
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT candidates to sign or a candidate has stayed
MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS in the queue, in both cases we sign what
candidates we have available.

This should allow us to reduce the number of approvals messages we have
to create/send/verify. The parameters are configurable, so we should
find some values that balance:

- Security of the network: Delaying broadcasting of an approval
shouldn't but the finality at risk and to make sure that never happens
we won't delay sending a vote if we are past 2/3 from the no-show time.
- Scalability of the network: MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT = 1 &
MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS =0, is what we have now and we know from
the measurements we did on versi, it bottlenecks
approval-distribution/approval-voting when increase significantly the
number of validators and parachains
- Block storage: In case of disputes we have to import this votes on
chain and that increase the necessary storage with
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT * CandidateHash per vote. Given that
disputes are not the normal way of the network functioning and we will
limit MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT in the single digits numbers, this
should be good enough. Alternatively, we could try to create a better
way to store this on-chain through indirection, if that's needed.

## Other fixes:
- Fixed the fact that we were sending random assignments to
non-validators, that was wrong because those won't do anything with it
and they won't gossip it either because they do not have a grid topology
set, so we would waste the random assignments.
- Added metrics to be able to debug potential no-shows and
mis-processing of approvals/assignments.

## TODO:
- [x] Get feedback, that this is moving in the right direction. @ordian
@sandreim @eskimor

 @burdges, let me know what you think.
- [x] More and more testing.
- [x]  Test in versi.
- [x] Make MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT &
MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_WAIT_MILLIS a parachain host configuration.
- [x] Make sure the backwards compatibility works correctly
- [x] Make sure this direction is compatible with other streams of work:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/635 &
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/742
- [x] Final versi burn-in before merging

---------

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>

This PR introduces a script and some templates to use the prdoc involved
in a release and build:
- the changelog
- a simple draft of audience documentation

Since the prdoc presence was enforced in the middle of the version
1.5.0, not all PRs did come with a `prdoc` file.
This PR creates all the missing `prdoc` files with some minimum content
allowing to properly generate the changelog.
The generated content is **not** suitable for the audience
documentation.

The audience documentation will be possible with the next version, when
all PR come with a proper `prdoc`.

## Assumptions

- the prdoc files for release `vX.Y.Z` have been moved under
`prdoc/X.Y.Z`
- the changelog requires for now for the prdoc files to contain author +
topic. Thos fields are optional.

The build script can  be called as:
```
VERSION=X.Y.Z ./scripts/release/build-changelogs.sh
```

Related:
-  #1408

---------

Co-authored-by: EgorPopelyaev <[email protected]>

This PR makes the block number provider configurable through the Config
trait in pallet-vesting, this gives parachains the option to use the
relay chain block number provider from ParachainSystem.

---------

Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>

Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2641

# Motivation (+testing)

### Enable easy `ForeignAssets` transfers using `pallet-xcm` 

We had just previously added capabilities to teleport fees during
reserve-based transfers, but what about reserve-transferring fees when
needing to teleport some non-fee asset?

This PR aligns everything under either explicit reserve-transfer,
explicit teleport, or this new flexible `transfer_assets()` which can
mix and match as needed with fewer artificial constraints imposed to the
user.

This will enable, for example, a (non-system) parachain to teleport
their `ForeignAssets` assets to AssetHub while using DOT to pay fees.
(the assets are teleported - as foreign assets should from their owner
chain - while DOT used for fees can only be reserve-based transferred
between said parachain and AssetHub).

Added `xcm-emulator` tests for this scenario ^.

# Description

Reverts `(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets` to only allow reserve-based
transfers for all `assets` including fees.

Similarly `(limited_)teleport_assets` only allows teleports for all
`assets` including fees.
    
For complex combinations of asset transfers where assets and fees may
have different reserves or different reserve/teleport trust
configurations, users can use the newly added `transfer_assets()`
extrinsic which is more flexible in allowing more complex scenarios.

`assets` (excluding `fees`) must have same reserve location or otherwise
be teleportable to `dest`.
No limitations imposed on `fees`.

- for local reserve: transfer assets to sovereign account of destination
chain and forward a notification XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit
reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`.
- for destination reserve: burn local assets and forward a notification
to `dest` chain to withdraw the reserve assets from this chain's
sovereign account and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
- for remote reserve: burn local assets, forward XCM to reserve chain to
move reserves from this chain's SA to `dest` chain's SA, and forward
another XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to
`beneficiary`.
- for teleports: burn local assets and forward XCM to `dest` chain to
mint/teleport assets and deposit them to `beneficiary`.

## Review notes

Only around 500 lines are prod code (see `pallet_xcm/src/lib.rs`), the
rest of the PR is new tests and improving existing tests.

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

Follow up to fix a bug from #1814 discovered in XCM emulator testing.

I mistakenly thought that checking out an asset would withdraw it from
the sender. This actually withdraws the asset before checking out.

---------

Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]>

The `BlockNumber` and `Hash` are fixed types any way.

Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Vladimir Istyufeev <[email protected]>

## Overview

This PR aligns the `spec_version` formatting to the [recent
changes](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/26/files#diff-efa4caeb17487ecb13d8f5eb7863c3241d84afa2e73fbf25909a2ca89df0f362R142)
made for the Polkadot/Kusama runtimes.

It also backports the latest version `v1.4.0` bumps as `1_004_000`.

## Details

During the switch from `v0.9` to `v1.x`, the format of the
`spec_version` was modified from: `(M)m_ppp` for a runtime considered on
version `M.m.pp`. For instance `0.9.42` had a `spec_version` of `9420`.

With the transition to `v1.x`, the format was changed to a bigger number
(still `u32`) formatted as `MM_mm_ppp` where `1.2.3` would be stored as
`01_02_003`.

This PR aligns the format with that has been introduced in the
fellowship repo: `MMM_mmm_ppp`.

---------

Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>

Missed in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1672

The goal of this PR is to migrate Identity deposits from the Relay Chain
to a system parachain.

The problem I want to solve is that `IdentityOf` and `SubsOf` both store
an amount that's held in reserve as a storage deposit. When migrating to
a parachain, we can take a snapshot of the actual `IdentityInfo` and
sub-account mappings, but should migrate (off chain) the `deposit`s to
zero, since the chain (and by extension, accounts) won't have any funds
at genesis.

The good news is that we expect parachain deposits to be significantly
lower (possibly 100x) on the parachain. That is, a deposit of 21 DOT on
the Relay Chain would need 0.21 DOT on a parachain. This PR proposes to
migrate the deposits in the following way:

1. Introduces a new pallet with two extrinsics: 
- `reap_identity`: Has a configurable `ReapOrigin`, which would be set
to `EnsureSigned` on the Relay Chain (i.e. callable by anyone) and
`EnsureRoot` on the parachain (we don't want identities reaped from
there).
- `poke_deposit`: Checks what deposit the pallet holds (at genesis,
zero) and attempts to update the amount based on the calculated deposit
for storage data.
2. `reap_identity` clears all storage data for a `target` account and
unreserves their deposit.
3. A `ReapIdentityHandler` teleports the necessary DOT to the parachain
and calls `poke_deposit`. Since the parachain deposit is much lower, and
was just unreserved, we know we have enough.

One awkwardness I ran into was that the XCMv3 instruction set does not
provide a way for the system to teleport assets without a fee being
deducted on reception. Users shouldn't have to pay a fee for the system
to migrate their info to a more efficient location. So I wrote my own
program and did the `InitiateTeleport` accounting on my own to send a
program with `UnpaidExecution`. Have discussed an
`InitiateUnpaidTeleport` instruction with @franciscoaguirre

 . Obviously
any chain executing this would have to pass a `Barrier` for free
execution.

TODO:

- [x] Confirm People Chain ParaId
- [x] Confirm People Chain deposit rates (determined in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2281)
- [x] Add pallet to Westend

---------

Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>

Adds a `NodeFeatures` bitfield value to the runtime `HostConfiguration`,
with the purpose of coordinating the enabling of node-side features,
such as: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/628 and
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/598.
These are features that require all validators enable them at the same
time, assuming all/most nodes have upgraded their node versions.

This PR doesn't add any feature yet. These are coming in future PRs.

Also adds a runtime API for querying the state of the client features
and an extrinsic for setting/unsetting a feature by its index in the bitfield.

Note: originally part of:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1644, but posted as
standalone to be reused by other PRs until the initial PR is merged

## Motivation

`pallet-xcm` is the main user-facing interface for XCM functionality,
including assets manipulation functions like `teleportAssets()` and
`reserve_transfer_assets()` calls.

While `teleportAsset()` works both ways, `reserve_transfer_assets()`
works only for sending reserve-based assets to a remote destination and
beneficiary when the reserve is the _local chain_.

## Solution

This PR enhances `pallet_xcm::(limited_)reserve_withdraw_assets` to
support transfers when reserves are other chains.
This will allow complete, **bi-directional** reserve-based asset
transfers user stories using `pallet-xcm`.

Enables following scenarios:
- transferring assets with local reserve (was previously supported iff
asset used as fee also had local reserve - now it works in all cases),
- transferring assets with reserve on destination,
- transferring assets with reserve on remote/third-party chain (iff
assets and fees have same remote reserve),
- transferring assets with reserve different than the reserve of the
asset to be used as fees - meaning can be used to transfer random asset
with local/dest reserve while using DOT for fees on all involved chains,
even if DOT local/dest reserve doesn't match asset reserve,
- transferring assets with any type of local/dest reserve while using
fees which can be teleported between involved chains.

All of the above is done by pallet inner logic without the user having
to specify which scenario/reserves/teleports/etc. The correct scenario
and corresponding XCM programs are identified, and respectively, built
automatically based on runtime configuration of trusted teleporters and
trusted reserves.

#### Current limitations:
- while `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CAN have different reserves (or
fees CAN be teleported), the remaining "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT, among
themselves, have different reserve locations (this is also implicitly
enforced by `MAX_ASSETS_FOR_TRANSFER=2`, but this can be safely
increased in the future).
- `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT have **different remote**
reserves (this could also be supported in the future, but adds even more
complexity while possibly not being worth it - we'll see what the future
holds).

Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1584
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2055

---------

Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>

Remove the `GRANDPA_AUTHORITIES_KEY` key and its usage. Apparently this
was used in the early days to communicate the grandpa authorities to the
node. However, we have now a runtime api that does this for us. So, this
pull request is moving from the custom managed storage item to a FRAME
managed storage item.

This pr also includes a migration for doing the switch on a running
chain.

---------

Co-authored-by: Davide Galassi <[email protected]>

We are introducing a new set of `XcmController` traits (final name yet
to be determined).
These traits are implemented by `pallet-xcm` and allows other pallets,
such as `pallet_contracts`, to rely on these traits instead of tight
coupling them to `pallet-xcm`.

Using only the existing Xcm traits would mean duplicating the logic from
`pallet-xcm` in these other pallets, which we aim to avoid. Our
objective is to ensure that when these APIs are called from
`pallet-contracts`, they produce the exact same outcomes as if called
directly from `pallet-xcm`.

The other benefits is that we can also expose return values to
`pallet-contracts` instead of just calling `pallet-xcm` dispatchable and
getting a `DispatchResult` back.

See traits integration in this PR
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1248, where the traits
are used as follow to define and implement `pallet-contracts` Config.
```rs
// Contracts config:
pub trait Config: frame_system::Config {
  // ...

  /// A type that exposes XCM APIs, allowing contracts to interact with other parachains, and
  /// execute XCM programs.
  type Xcm: xcm_executor::traits::Controller<
	  OriginFor<Self>,
	  <Self as frame_system::Config>::RuntimeCall,
	  BlockNumberFor<Self>,
  >;
}

// implementation
impl pallet_contracts::Config for Runtime {
        // ...

	type Xcm = pallet_xcm::Pallet<Self>;
}
```

---------

Co-authored-by: Alexander Theißen <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

As suggested by @ggwpez
(https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2142#discussion_r1388145872),
remove the `VersionChecked` prefix from version checked migrations (but
leave `VersionUnchecked` prefixes)

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

One for local networks with `fast-runtime` feature activated (1 minute
sessions) and one without the feature activated that will be the default
that runs with 1 hour long sessions.

Changes:
- Adds a new call `remove_key` to the sudo pallet to permanently remove
the sudo key.
- Remove some clones and general maintenance

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

This PR exposes a `force_remove_vesting` through a ROOT call. 
See linked
[issue](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/269)

---------

Co-authored-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <[email protected]>

This PR is a follow up to #1661 

- [x] rename the `simple` module to `legacy`
- [x] fix benchmarks to disregard the number of additional fields
- [x] change the storage deposits to charge per encoded byte of the
identity information instance, removing the need for `fn
additional(&self) -> usize` in `IdentityInformationProvider`
- [x] ~add an extrinsic to rejig deposits to account for the change
above~
- [ ] ~ensure through proper configuration that the new byte-based
deposit is always lower than whatever is reserved now~
- [x] remove `IdentityFields` from the `set_fields` extrinsic signature,
as per [this
discussion](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1661#discussion_r1371703403)

> ensure through proper configuration that the new byte-based deposit is
always lower than whatever is reserved now

Not sure this is needed anymore. If the new deposits are higher than
what is currently on chain and users don't have enough funds to reserve
what is needed, the extrinisc fails and they're basically grandfathered
and frozen until they add more funds and/or make a change to their
identity. This behavior seems fine to me. Original idea
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1661#issuecomment-1779606319).

> add an extrinsic to rejig deposits to account for the change above

This was initially implemented but now removed from this PR in favor of
the implementation detailed
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2088).

---------

Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: joepetrowski <[email protected]>

# Description

The `trigger_defensive` call has been added to the `root-testing`
pallet. The idea is to have this pallet running on `Rococo/Westend` and
use it to verify if the runtime monitoring works end-to-end.

To accomplish this, `trigger_defensive` dispatches an event when it is
called.

Closes #1953

# Checklist

- [x] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the
"Description" section above
- [ ] My PR follows the [labeling requirements](CONTRIBUTING.md#Process)
of this project (at minimum one label for `T`
  required)
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if
applicable)
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works (if applicable)

You can remove the "Checklist" section once all have been checked. Thank
you for your contribution!

✄
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>

Fixes #179 

# Description

This PR makes the structure containing identity information used in
`pallet-identity` generic through the pallet `Config`. Additionally, the
old structure is now available in a separate module called `simple`
(pending rename) and is compatible with the new interface.

Another change in this PR is that while the `additional` field in
`IdentityInfo` stays for backwards compatibility reasons, the associated
costs are stil present in the pallet through the `additional` function
in the `IdentityInformationProvider` interface. This function is marked
as deprecated as it is only a temporary solution to the backwards
compatibility problem we had. In short, we could have removed the
additional fields in the struct and done a migration, but we chose to
wait and do it off-chain through the genesis of the system parachain.
After we move the identity pallet to the parachain, additional fields
will be migrated into the existing fields and the `additional` key-value
store will be removed. Until that happens, this interface will provide
the necessary information to properly account for the associated costs.

Additionally, this PR fixes an unrelated issue; the `IdentityField` enum
used to represent the fields as bitflags couldn't store more than 8
fields, even though it was marked as `#[repr(u64)]`. This was because of
the `derive` implementation of `TypeInfo`, which assumed `u8` semantics.
The custom implementation of this trait in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/commit/0105cc03


fixes the issue.

---------

Signed-off-by: georgepisaltu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sam Johnson <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]>

closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1882

## Breaking Changes

This PR introduces a new item to `pallet_balances::Config`:

```diff
trait Config {
++    type RuntimeFreezeReasons;
}
```

This value is only used to check it against `type MaxFreeze`. A similar
check has been added for `MaxHolds` against `RuntimeHoldReasons`, which
is already given to `pallet_balances`.

In all contexts, you should pass the real `RuntimeFreezeReasons`
generated by `construct_runtime` to `type RuntimeFreezeReasons`. Passing
`()` would also work, but it would imply that the runtime uses no
freezes at all.

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>

Reverts https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1476

The `lock_pallet` / `unlock_pallet` additions in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1814 will result in less
downtime for users than using runtime upgrades.

## Problem

This PR addresses the issue with testnet AssetHub builds, which was
discovered during the execution of `bot bench`.

https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/4038738
```
     Compiling asset-hub-rococo-runtime-wasm v1.0.0 (/builds/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/target/production/wbuild/asset-hub-rococo-runtime)
  warning: Linking globals named 'Core_version': symbol multiply defined!
  error: failed to load bitcode of module "rococo_runtime-8799ee884447805a.rococo_runtime.0bc572b8-cgu.0.rcgu.o": 
  warning: `asset-hub-rococo-runtime-wasm` (lib) generated 1 warning
  error: could not compile `asset-hub-rococo-runtime-wasm` (lib) due to previous error; 1 warning emitted
```

https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/4038739
```
Compiling asset-hub-westend-runtime-wasm v1.0.0 (/builds/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/target/production/wbuild/asset-hub-westend-runtime)
  warning: Linking globals named 'Core_version': symbol multiply defined!
  error: failed to load bitcode of module "westend_runtime-86d7844430f97d5c.westend_runtime.b7678d03-cgu.0.rcgu.o": 
  warning: `asset-hub-westend-runtime-wasm` (lib) generated 1 warning
  error: could not compile `asset-hub-westend-runtime-wasm` (lib) due to previous error; 1 warning emitted
```

## Solution

- Removed dependencies on `rococo-runtime` and `westend-runtime`
introduced by [this
PR](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1234/files#diff-a86375df98e04ca3cce1ea35c40257a222e2d5087f5f528ff33307678b78dc2dR534-R550).
- Replaced `<rococo_runtime::Treasury as PalletInfoAccess>::index()`
with `rococo_runtime_constants::TREASURY_PALLET_ID`.
- Added `check_treasury_pallet_id` to the relay runtimes to ensure that
the constant is aligned with the pallet id.
- Added "Rococo Treasury" to the waived locations (that will not be
charged fees in the executor) for `BridgeHubRococo` (to be aligned with
AssetHubs).

## References

[Full element discussion
here](https://matrix.to/#/!JUeaZUiYbdrvzvtwSL:parity.io/$2PnjYMsWRjR7M3oOfGuRI0XkjdoqJLtRcAPVcDLuLVg?via=parity.io&via=web3.foundation).

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

Combination of paritytech/polkadot#7005, its addon PR
paritytech/polkadot#7585 and its companion paritytech/cumulus#2433.

This PR introduces a new XcmFeesToAccount struct which implements the
`FeeManager` trait, and assigns this struct as the `FeeManager` in the
XCM config for all runtimes.

The struct simply deposits all fees handled by the XCM executor to a
specified account. In all runtimes, the specified account is configured
as the treasury account.

XCM __delivery__ fees are now being introduced (unless the root origin
is sending a message to a system parachain on behalf of the originating
chain).

# Note for reviewers

Most file changes are tests that had to be modified to account for the
new fees.
Main changes are in:
- cumulus/pallets/xcmp-queue/src/lib.rs <- To make it track the delivery
fees exponential factor
- polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/fee_handling.rs <- Added. Has the
FeeManager implementation
- All runtime xcm_config files <- To add the FeeManager to the XCM
configuration

# Important note

After this change, instructions that create and send a new XCM (Query*,
Report*, ExportMessage, InitiateReserveWithdraw, InitiateTeleport,
DepositReserveAsset, TransferReserveAsset, LockAsset and RequestUnlock)
will require the corresponding origin account in the origin register to
pay for transport delivery fees, and the onward message will fail to be
sent if the origin account does not have the required amount. This
delivery fee is on top of what we already collect as tx fees in
pallet-xcm and XCM BuyExecution fees!

Wallet UIs that want to expose the new delivery fee can do so using the
formula:

```
delivery_fee_factor * (base_fee + encoded_msg_len * per_byte_fee)
```

where the delivery fee factor can be obtained from the corresponding
pallet based on which transport you are using (UMP, HRMP or bridges),
the base fee is a constant, the encoded message length from the message
itself and the per byte fee is the same as the configured per byte fee
for txs (i.e. `TransactionByteFee`).

---------

Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Giles Cope <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <[email protected]>

cumulus: add asset-hub-rococo runtime based on asset-hub-kusama and add asset-bridging support to it (#1215)

This commit adds Rococo Asset Hub dedicated runtime so we can test new
features here, before merging them in Kusama Asset Hub.
Also adds one such feature: asset transfer over bridge (Rococo AssetHub
<> Wococo AssetHub)

- clone `asset-hub-kusama-runtime` -> `asset-hub-rococo-runtime`
- make it use Rococo primitives, names, assets, constants, etc
- add asset-transfer-over-bridge support to Rococo AssetHub <> Wococo
AssetHub

Fixes #1128

---------

Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>

Following
[polkadot#7314](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7314) and
after merging https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1177 this
PR solves https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1618

The following is a summary of the outcome of the migration.

| Module | Total Accounts | Total stake to unlock | Total deposit to
unreserve |
| ------- | --------------- | --------------------- |
-------------------------- |
| Elections Phragmen | 27 | 1,132.821063320441 ROC | 1.465386531600 ROC
|
| Democracy | 69 | 2733.923509345613 ROC | 0.166666665000 ROC |
| Tips | 4 | N/A | 0.015099999849 ROC |

The migrations will also remove the following amount of keys

103 Democracy keys 🧹
5 Council keys 🧹
1 TechnicalCommittee keys 🧹
25 PhragmenElection keys 🧹
1 TechnicalMembership keys 🧹
9 Tips keys 🧹

Exposes disabled validators list via a runtime API.

---------

Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]>

[xcm] Use `Weight::MAX` for `reserve_asset_deposited`, `receive_teleported_asset` benchmarks (#1726)

# Description

## Summary

Previously, the `pallet_xcm::do_reserve_transfer_assets` and
`pallet_xcm::do_teleport_assets` functions relied on weight estimation
for remote chain execution, which was based on guesswork derived from
the local chain. This approach led to complications for runtimes that
did not provide or support specific [XCM
configurations](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76/polkadot/xcm/xcm-executor/src/config.rs#L43-L47)
for `IsReserve` or `IsTeleporter`. Consequently, such runtimes had to
resort to implementing hard-coded weights for XCM instructions like
`reserve_asset_deposited` or `receive_teleported_asset` to support
extrinsics such as `pallet_xcm::reserve_transfer_assets` and
`pallet_xcm::teleport_assets`, which depended on remote weight
estimation.

The issue of remote weight estimation was addressed and resolved by
[Pull Request
#1645](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1645), which
removed the need for remote weight estimation.

## Solution

As a continuation of this improvement, the current PR proposes further
cleanup by removing unnecessary hard-coded values and rectifying
benchmark results with `Weight::MAX` that previously used
`T::BlockWeights::get().max_block` as an override for unsupported XCM
instructions like `ReserveAssetDeposited` and `ReceiveTeleportedAsset`.


## Questions

- [x] Can we remove now also `Hardcoded till the XCM pallet is fixed`
for `deposit_asset`? E.g. for AssetHubKusama
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76/cumulus/parachains/runtimes/assets/asset-hub-kusama/src/weights/xcm/mod.rs#L129-L134)
- [x] Are comments like
[this](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76/polkadot/runtime/kusama/src/weights/xcm/mod.rs#L94)
`// Kusama doesn't support ReserveAssetDeposited, so this benchmark has
a default weight` still relevant? Shouldnt be removed/changed?


## TODO

- [x] `bench bot` regenerate xcm weights for all runtimes
- [x] remove hard-coded stuff from system parachain weight files
- [ ] when merged, open `polkadot-fellow/runtimes` PR

## References

Fixes #1132
Closes #1132
Old polkadot repo [PR](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7546)

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

### Summary 

This PR introduces new dispatchables to the treasury pallet, allowing
spends of various asset types. The enhanced features of the treasury
pallet, in conjunction with the asset-rate pallet, are set up and
enabled for Westend and Rococo.

### Westend and Rococo runtimes.

Polkadot/Kusams/Rococo Treasury can accept proposals for `spends` of
various asset kinds by specifying the asset's location and ID.

#### Treasury Instance New Dispatchables:
- `spend(AssetKind, AssetBalance, Beneficiary, Option<ValidFrom>)` -
propose and approve a spend;
- `payout(SpendIndex)` - payout an approved spend or retry a failed
payout
- `check_payment(SpendIndex)` - check the status of a payout;
- `void_spend(SpendIndex)` - void previously approved spend;
> existing spend dispatchable renamed to spend_local

in this context, the `AssetKind` parameter contains the asset's location
and it's corresponding `asset_id`, for example:
`USDT` on `AssetHub`,
``` rust
location = MultiLocation(0, X1(Parachain(1000)))
asset_id = MultiLocation(0, X2(PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)))
```

the `Beneficiary` parameter is a `MultiLocation` in the context of the
asset's location, for example
``` rust
// the Fellowship salary pallet's location / account
FellowshipSalaryPallet = MultiLocation(1, X2(Parachain(1001), PalletInstance(64)))
// or custom `AccountId`
Alice = MultiLocation(0, AccountId32(network: None, id: [1,...]))
```

the `AssetBalance` represents the amount of the `AssetKind` to be
transferred to the `Beneficiary`. For permission checks, the asset
amount is converted to the native amount and compared against the
maximum spendable amount determined by the commanding spend origin.

the `spend` dispatchable allows for batching spends with different
`ValidFrom` arguments, enabling milestone-based spending. If the
expectations tied to an approved spend are not met, it is possible to
void the spend later using the `void_spend` dispatchable.

Asset Rate Pallet provides the conversion rate from the `AssetKind` to
the native balance.

#### Asset Rate Instance Dispatchables:
- `create(AssetKind, Rate)` - initialize a conversion rate to the native
balance for the given asset
- `update(AssetKind, Rate)` - update the conversion rate to the native
balance for the given asset
- `remove(AssetKind)` - remove an existing conversion rate to the native
balance for the given asset

the pallet's dispatchables can be executed by the Root or Treasurer
origins.

### Treasury Pallet

Treasury Pallet can accept proposals for `spends` of various asset kinds
and pay them out through the implementation of the `Pay` trait.

New Dispatchables:
- `spend(Config::AssetKind, AssetBalance, Config::Beneficiary,
Option<ValidFrom>)` - propose and approve a spend;
- `payout(SpendIndex)` - payout an approved spend or retry a failed
payout;
- `check_payment(SpendIndex)` - check the status of a payout;
- `void_spend(SpendIndex)` - void previously approved spend;
> existing spend dispatchable renamed to spend_local

The parameters' types of the `spend` dispatchable exposed via the
pallet's `Config` and allows to propose and accept a spend of a certain
amount.

An approved spend can be claimed via the `payout` within the
`Config::SpendPeriod`. Clients provide an implementation of the `Pay`
trait which can pay an asset of the `AssetKind` to the `Beneficiary` in
`AssetBalance` units.

The implementation of the Pay trait might not have an immediate final
payment status, for example if implemented over `XCM` and the actual
transfer happens on a remote chain.

The `check_status` dispatchable can be executed to update the spend's
payment state and retry the `payout` if the payment has failed.

---------

Co-authored-by: joe petrowski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

Migrating [PR from the archived polkadot
repo](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7272)

As per
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7272#issuecomment-1559240466,
the changes in this MR include the following pallets into [x] Rococo and
[x] Westend runtimes:

    pallet_conviction_voting
    pallet_referenda
    pallet_ranked_collective
    pallet_custom_origins
    pallet_whitelist

And only for westend-runtime:

    pallet_treasury

Following [Kusama runtime
config](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/tree/dbae30efe080a1d41fe54ef4da8af47614c9ca93/runtime/kusama/src)
as a baseline.

Benchmarking of the following pallets done for both Rococo and Westend:

    pallet_conviction_voting
    pallet_referenda
    pallet_ranked_collective (only on Rococo)
    pallet_whitelist

And only for Westend:

    pallet_treasury

Removed Gov1 from Rococo as in
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6701

Rococo Gov1 storage will be cleaned in a different PR - [issue ](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1618)

---------

Co-authored-by: Giles Cope <[email protected]>

- Async-backing related primitives are stable `primitives::v6`
- Async-backing API is now part of `api_version(7)`
- It's enabled on Rococo and Westend runtimes

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andrei Sandu <[email protected]>

This PR implements [`GenesisBuilder`
API](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/a414ea75

/substrate/primitives/genesis-builder/src/lib.rs#L38)
for all the runtimes in polkadot repo.

Step towards: paritytech/polkadot-sdk#25

---------

Co-authored-by: ordian <[email protected]>

This PR filters calls from the Identity pallet from all Relay Chain
runtimes as preparation to move the identity state and logic to a system
parachain within each network.

After this change is deployed to a runtime, no more changes such as
adding new sub-identities will be possible. The frozen state will be
part of the genesis state of the system chain. After the system chain
launches, the pallet and all state will be removed from each Relay
Chain.

Applications and UIs that render display information from this pallet
will need to read from the system chain when it launches.

The goal is to allow Fellowship on Collective chain to have a sovereign
account on Polkadot so that we can add it as an identity registrar. This
will allow Fellows origin to be able to provide judgements for
Fellowship members.

This currently allow any body on any parachain including non system
parachains to have sovereign account. I cannot think of any reason why
that may be an issue but let me know if I should change it to filter
only system parachains.

[This](https://gist.github.com/xlc/ec61bfa4e9f6d62da27d30141ad2c72b) is
the testing script.

Original PR: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7518

Solution to establish HRMP channels between system parachains.

---------

Co-authored-by: Muharem Ismailov <[email protected]>

## Summary 
The term "common good parachain" has been abandoned in favor of "system
parachain" - e.g. [Joe's speech at
Decoded2023](https://youtu.be/CSO-ERHK2gY?t=456). This pull request
tries to fix and align code with this vision.

## Impact

The important change is implementation of `trait IsSystem` for `Id`
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1406/files#diff-0b7b4f5b962a18ce980354592b55ab2a27b5a2e9f6f8089ec803ca73853e8583R225-R229)
where we changed condition from `< 1000` to `<= 1999`, which means that
all parachain IDs bellow 1999 (included) are considered as "system
parachain" IDs. This change has a direct impact on the following
components:

####
[ChildSystemParachainAsSuperuser](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/origin_conversion.rs#L72-L88)
This origin converter is used for allowing to process XCM `Transact`
from "system parachain" on the relay chain - e.g. see [configuration for
Kusama](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/polkadot/runtime/kusama/src/xcm_config.rs#L92-L101).
Only configured for Kusama, Westend, Rococo runtimes.

**No need for this feature anymore.** See
[comment](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1406#issuecomment-1708218715).

####
[IsChildSystemParachain](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/barriers.rs#L310-L317)
`IsChildSystemParachain` is used with `AllowExplicitUnpaidExecutionFrom`
barrier for checking XCM programs (they have to start with
`UnpaidExecution` instruction).
Only configured for Kusama, Westend, Rococo runtimes.

**Overall the impact is low or mostly ok because it only allows unpaid
execution for "system parachains" (e.g. AssetHub, BridgeHub...) on the
relay chain.**

####
[SiblingSystemParachainAsSuperuser](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/origin_conversion.rs#L94-L114)

Not used anywhere in `polkadot-sdk` repo.


## Unresolved Questions
- [ ] constants `LOWEST_USER_ID` and `LOWEST_PUBLIC_ID` seem to express
the same thing now, do we want to keep them both or deprecated one of
them? If so, which one?
- [x] determine impact for `ChildSystemParachainAsSuperuser`

## TODO

- [ ] when merged here, open PR to the `polkadot-fellows`

## Related Material
https://youtu.be/CSO-ERHK2gY?t=456

https://forum.polkadot.network/t/polkadot-protocol-and-common-good-parachains/866
https://wiki.polkadot.network/docs/learn-system-chains