## Summary

This pull request proposes a solution for improved control of the
versioned XCM flow over the bridge (across different consensus chains)
and resolves the situation where the sending chain/consensus has already
migrated to a higher XCM version than the receiving chain/consensus.

## Problem/Motivation

The current flow over the bridge involves a transfer from AssetHubRococo
(AHR) to BridgeHubRococo (BHR) to BridgeHubWestend (BHW) and finally to
AssetHubWestend (AHW), beginning with a reserve-backed transfer on AHR.

In this process:
1. AHR sends XCM `ExportMessage` through `XcmpQueue`, incorporating XCM
version checks using the `WrapVersion` feature, influenced by
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion` (managed by
`pallet_xcm::force_xcm_version` or version discovery).

2. BHR handles the `ExportMessage` instruction, utilizing the latest XCM
version. The `HaulBlobExporter` converts the inner XCM to
[`VersionedXcm::from`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/63ac2471/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/universal_exports.rs#L465-L467),
also using the latest XCM version.

However, challenges arise:
- Incompatibility when BHW uses a different version than BHR. For
instance, if BHR migrates to **XCMv4** while BHW remains on **XCMv3**,
BHR's `VersionedXcm::from` uses `VersionedXcm::V4` variant, causing
encoding issues for BHW.
  ```
	/// Just a simulation of possible error, which could happen on BHW
	/// (this code is based on actual master without XCMv4)
	let encoded = hex_literal::hex!("0400");
	println!("{:?}", VersionedXcm::<()>::decode(&mut &encoded[..]));

Err(Error { cause: None, desc: "Could not decode `VersionedXcm`, variant
doesn't exist" })
  ``` 
- Similar compatibility issues exist between AHR and AHW.

## Solution

This pull request introduces the following solutions:

1. **New trait `CheckVersion`** - added to the `xcm` module and exposing
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion`. This enhancement allows checking the
actual XCM version for desired destinations outside of the `pallet_xcm`
module.

2. **Version Check in `HaulBlobExporter`** uses `CheckVersion` to check
known/configured destination versions, ensuring compatibility. For
example, in the scenario mentioned, BHR can store the version `3` for
BHW. If BHR is on XCMv4, it will attempt to downgrade the message to
version `3` instead of using the latest version `4`.

3. **Version Check in `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router`** - this check
ensures compatibility with the real destination's XCM version,
preventing the unnecessary sending of messages to the local bridge hub
if versions are incompatible.

These additions aim to improve the control and compatibility of XCM
flows over the bridge and addressing issues related to version
mismatches.

## Possible alternative solution

_(More investigation is needed, and at the very least, it should extend
to XCMv4/5. If this proves to be a viable option, I can open an RFC for
XCM.)._

Add the `XcmVersion` attribute to the `ExportMessage` so that the
sending chain can determine, based on what is stored in
`pallet_xcm::SupportedVersion`, the version the destination is using.
This way, we may not need to handle the version in `HaulBlobExporter`.

```
ExportMessage {
	network: NetworkId,
	destination: InteriorMultiLocation,
	xcm: Xcm<()>
	destination_xcm_version: Version, // <- new attritbute
},
```

```
pub trait ExportXcm {
        fn validate(
		network: NetworkId,
		channel: u32,
		universal_source: &mut Option<InteriorMultiLocation>,
		destination: &mut Option<InteriorMultiLocation>,
		message: &mut Option<Xcm<()>>,
                destination_xcm_version: Version, , // <- new attritbute
	) -> SendResult<Self::Ticket>;
```

## Future Directions

This PR does not fix version discovery over bridge, further
investigation will be conducted here:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2417.

## TODO

- [x] `pallet_xcm` mock for tests uses hard-coded XCM version `2` -
change to 3 or lastest?
- [x] fix `pallet-xcm-bridge-hub-router`
- [x] fix HaulBlobExporter with version determination
[here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/2183669d/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/universal_exports.rs#L465)
- [x] add unit-tests to the runtimes
- [x] run benchmarks for `ExportMessage`
- [x] extend local run scripts about `force_xcm_version(dest, version)`
- [ ] when merged, prepare governance calls for Rococo/Westend
- [ ] add PRDoc

Part of: https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/issues/2719

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

For some reason original PR passed CI - when it shouldn't have. Fix
`pallet-xcm` test benchmarks.

# Motivation (+testing)

### Enable easy `ForeignAssets` transfers using `pallet-xcm` 

We had just previously added capabilities to teleport fees during
reserve-based transfers, but what about reserve-transferring fees when
needing to teleport some non-fee asset?

This PR aligns everything under either explicit reserve-transfer,
explicit teleport, or this new flexible `transfer_assets()` which can
mix and match as needed with fewer artificial constraints imposed to the
user.

This will enable, for example, a (non-system) parachain to teleport
their `ForeignAssets` assets to AssetHub while using DOT to pay fees.
(the assets are teleported - as foreign assets should from their owner
chain - while DOT used for fees can only be reserve-based transferred
between said parachain and AssetHub).

Added `xcm-emulator` tests for this scenario ^.

# Description

Reverts `(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets` to only allow reserve-based
transfers for all `assets` including fees.

Similarly `(limited_)teleport_assets` only allows teleports for all
`assets` including fees.
    
For complex combinations of asset transfers where assets and fees may
have different reserves or different reserve/teleport trust
configurations, users can use the newly added `transfer_assets()`
extrinsic which is more flexible in allowing more complex scenarios.

`assets` (excluding `fees`) must have same reserve location or otherwise
be teleportable to `dest`.
No limitations imposed on `fees`.

- for local reserve: transfer assets to sovereign account of destination
chain and forward a notification XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit
reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`.
- for destination reserve: burn local assets and forward a notification
to `dest` chain to withdraw the reserve assets from this chain's
sovereign account and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
- for remote reserve: burn local assets, forward XCM to reserve chain to
move reserves from this chain's SA to `dest` chain's SA, and forward
another XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to
`beneficiary`.
- for teleports: burn local assets and forward XCM to `dest` chain to
mint/teleport assets and deposit them to `beneficiary`.

## Review notes

Only around 500 lines are prod code (see `pallet_xcm/src/lib.rs`), the
rest of the PR is new tests and improving existing tests.

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>

On extrinsics/call, ensure local XCM execution is complete/successful.
Otherwise, fail the extrinsic so that state changes don't get committed
to the db.

Added regression tests that fail without the fix.

fixes #2237

---------

Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>

Disallow reserve transfers that use teleportable fees if `(origin,
fees)` matches `XcmTeleportFilter`.

Add regression tests for filtering based on `XcmTeleportFilter` for both
`(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets()` and `(limited_)teleport_assets`
extrinsics.

## Motivation

`pallet-xcm` is the main user-facing interface for XCM functionality,
including assets manipulation functions like `teleportAssets()` and
`reserve_transfer_assets()` calls.

While `teleportAsset()` works both ways, `reserve_transfer_assets()`
works only for sending reserve-based assets to a remote destination and
beneficiary when the reserve is the _local chain_.

## Solution

This PR enhances `pallet_xcm::(limited_)reserve_withdraw_assets` to
support transfers when reserves are other chains.
This will allow complete, **bi-directional** reserve-based asset
transfers user stories using `pallet-xcm`.

Enables following scenarios:
- transferring assets with local reserve (was previously supported iff
asset used as fee also had local reserve - now it works in all cases),
- transferring assets with reserve on destination,
- transferring assets with reserve on remote/third-party chain (iff
assets and fees have same remote reserve),
- transferring assets with reserve different than the reserve of the
asset to be used as fees - meaning can be used to transfer random asset
with local/dest reserve while using DOT for fees on all involved chains,
even if DOT local/dest reserve doesn't match asset reserve,
- transferring assets with any type of local/dest reserve while using
fees which can be teleported between involved chains.

All of the above is done by pallet inner logic without the user having
to specify which scenario/reserves/teleports/etc. The correct scenario
and corresponding XCM programs are identified, and respectively, built
automatically based on runtime configuration of trusted teleporters and
trusted reserves.

#### Current limitations:
- while `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CAN have different reserves (or
fees CAN be teleported), the remaining "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT, among
themselves, have different reserve locations (this is also implicitly
enforced by `MAX_ASSETS_FOR_TRANSFER=2`, but this can be safely
increased in the future).
- `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT have **different remote**
reserves (this could also be supported in the future, but adds even more
complexity while possibly not being worth it - we'll see what the future
holds).

Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1584
Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2055

---------

Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>