Skip to content
  1. Dec 13, 2023
    • Alexandru Gheorghe's avatar
      Approve multiple candidates with a single signature (#1191) · a84dd0db
      Alexandru Gheorghe authored
      Initial implementation for the plan discussed here: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/701
      Built on top of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1178
      v0: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7554,
      
      ## Overall idea
      
      When approval-voting checks a candidate and is ready to advertise the
      approval, defer it in a per-relay chain block until we either have
      MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT candidates to sign or a candidate has stayed
      MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS in the queue, in both cases we sign what
      candidates we have available.
      
      This should allow us to reduce the number of approvals messages we have
      to create/send/verify. The parameters are configurable, so we should
      find some values that balance:
      
      - Security of the network: Delaying broadcasting of an approval
      shouldn't but the finality at risk and to make sure that never happens
      we won't delay sending a vote if we are past 2/3 from the no-show time.
      - Scalability of the network: MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT = 1 &
      MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS =0, is what we have now and we know from
      the measurements we did on versi, it bottlenecks
      approval-distribution/approval-voting when increase significantly the
      number of validators and parachains
      - Block storage: In case of disputes we have to import this votes on
      chain and that increase the necessary storage with
      MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT * CandidateHash per vote. Given that
      disputes are not the normal way of the network functioning and we will
      limit MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT in the single digits numbers, this
      should be good enough. Alternatively, we could try to create a better
      way to store this on-chain through indirection, if that's needed.
      
      ## Other fixes:
      - Fixed the fact that we were sending random assignments to
      non-validators, that was wrong because those won't do anything with it
      and they won't gossip it either because they do not have a grid topology
      set, so we would waste the random assignments.
      - Added metrics to be able to debug potential no-shows and
      mis-processing of approvals/assignments.
      
      ## TODO:
      - [x] Get feedback, that this is moving in the right direction. @ordian
      @sandreim @eskimor @burdges, let me know what you think.
      - [x] More and more testing.
      - [x]  Test in versi.
      - [x] Make MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT &
      MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_WAIT_MILLIS a parachain host configuration.
      - [x] Make sure the backwards compatibility works correctly
      - [x] Make sure this direction is compatible with other streams of work:
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/635 &
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/742
      
      
      - [x] Final versi burn-in before merging
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
      a84dd0db
  2. Dec 12, 2023
    • Chevdor's avatar
      Changelogs local generation (#1411) · 42a3afba
      Chevdor authored
      
      
      This PR introduces a script and some templates to use the prdoc involved
      in a release and build:
      - the changelog
      - a simple draft of audience documentation
      
      Since the prdoc presence was enforced in the middle of the version
      1.5.0, not all PRs did come with a `prdoc` file.
      This PR creates all the missing `prdoc` files with some minimum content
      allowing to properly generate the changelog.
      The generated content is **not** suitable for the audience
      documentation.
      
      The audience documentation will be possible with the next version, when
      all PR come with a proper `prdoc`.
      
      ## Assumptions
      
      - the prdoc files for release `vX.Y.Z` have been moved under
      `prdoc/X.Y.Z`
      - the changelog requires for now for the prdoc files to contain author +
      topic. Thos fields are optional.
      
      The build script can  be called as:
      ```
      VERSION=X.Y.Z ./scripts/release/build-changelogs.sh
      ```
      
      Related:
      -  #1408
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarEgorPopelyaev <[email protected]>
      42a3afba
  3. Dec 11, 2023
  4. Dec 08, 2023
  5. Dec 07, 2023
  6. Dec 06, 2023
  7. Dec 05, 2023
  8. Dec 01, 2023
  9. Nov 30, 2023
  10. Nov 29, 2023
    • Will | Paradox | ParaNodes.io's avatar
      Adding LuckyFriday's Bootnodes per IBP Application (#2538) · 2858cbc2
      Will | Paradox | ParaNodes.io authored
      Good day,
      
      This PR requests the inclusion of two bootnode entries for Polkadot,
      Kusama and Westend as part of LuckyFriday's IBP application. The nodes
      are hosted on self-owned hardware in a co-located facility. We've
      undertaken connectivity tests ourselves and also from members of the
      IBP.
      
      The test commands used are as follows:
      
      ```
      polkadot --chain westend --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-westend.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30334/wss/p2p/12D3KooWDg1YEytdwFFNWroFj6gio4YFsMB3miSbHKgdpJteUMB9" --no-hardware-benchmarks
      
      polkadot --chain westend --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-westend.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30333/p2p/12D3KooWDg1YEytdwFFNWroFj6gio4YFsMB3miSbHKgdpJteUMB9" --no-hardware-benchmarks
      
      polkadot --chain kusama --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-kusama.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30334/wss/p2p/12D3KooW9vu1GWHBuxyhm7rZgD3fhGZpNajPXFexadvhujWMgwfT" --no-hardware-benchmarks
      
      polkadot --chain kusama --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-kusama.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30333/p2p/12D3KooW9vu1GWHBuxyhm7rZgD3fhGZpNajPXFexadvhujWMgwfT" --no-hardware-benchmarks
      
      polkadot --chain polkadot --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-polkadot.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30334/wss/p2p/12D3KooWEjk6QXrZJ26fLpaajisJGHiz6WiQsR8k7mkM9GmWKnRZ" --no-hardware-benchmarks
      
      polkadot --chain polkadot --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/ibp-boot-polkadot.luckyfriday.io/tcp/30333/p2p/12D3KooWEjk6QXrZJ26fLpaajisJGHiz6WiQsR8k7mkM9GmWKnRZ" --no-hardware-benchmarks
      ```
      
      All tests yielded syncing with 1 peer, a positive result. We have also
      backed up our node-key in the event that restoration is required.
      
      I hope that the aforementioned meets the requirement for inclusion and
      look forward to a speedy turnaround.
      
      Kind Regards,
      Will | Paradox
      2858cbc2
    • Bastian Köcher's avatar
      ParachainHost: No need to be generic over the block or hash type (#2537) · d3d301fa
      Bastian Köcher authored
      The `BlockNumber` and `Hash` are fixed types any way.
      d3d301fa
  11. Nov 28, 2023
  12. Nov 27, 2023
    • Maciej's avatar
      Zombienet tests - disputes on finalized blocks (#2184) · dc69dbba
      Maciej authored
      
      
      **Overview:**
      Adding an extra malus variant focusing on disputing finalized blocks. It
      will:
      - wrap around approval-voting
      - listen to `OverseerSignal::BlockFinalized` and when encountered start
      a dispute for the `dispute_offset`th ancestor
      - simply pass through all other messages and signals
      
      Add zombienet tests testing various edgecases:
      - disputing freshly finalized blocks
      - disputing stale finalized blocks
      - disputing eagerly pruned finalized blocks (might be separate PR)
      
      **TODO:**
      - [x] Register new malus variant
      - [x] Simple pass through wrapper (approval-voting)
      - [x] Simple network definition
      - [x] Listen to block finalizations
      - [x] Fetch ancestor hash
      - [x] Fetch session index
      - [x] Fetch candidate
      - [x] Construct and send dispute message
      - [x] zndsl test 1 checking that disputes on fresh finalizations resolve
      valid Closes #1365
      - [x] zndsl test 2 checking that disputes for too old finalized blocks
      are not possible Closes #1364
      - [ ] zndsl test 3 checking that disputes for candidates with eagerly
      pruned relay parent state are handled correctly #1359 (deferred to a
      separate PR)
      - [x] Unit tests for new malus variant (testing cli etc)
      - [x] Clean/streamline error handling
      - [ ] ~~Ensure it tests properly on session boundaries~~
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarJavier Viola <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarMarcin S. <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarTsvetomir Dimitrov <[email protected]>
      dc69dbba
  13. Nov 25, 2023
  14. Nov 24, 2023
  15. Nov 23, 2023
  16. Nov 22, 2023
  17. Nov 21, 2023
  18. Nov 20, 2023
  19. Nov 19, 2023
  20. Nov 14, 2023
  21. Nov 13, 2023