Skip to content
  1. Feb 18, 2024
  2. Feb 16, 2024
    • georgepisaltu's avatar
      Add retry mechanics to `pallet-scheduler` (#3060) · 9346019d
      georgepisaltu authored
      
      
      Fixes #3014 
      
      This PR adds retry mechanics to `pallet-scheduler`, as described in the
      issue above.
      
      Users can now set a retry configuration for a task so that, in case its
      scheduled run fails, it will be retried after a number of blocks, for a
      specified number of times or until it succeeds.
      
      If a retried task runs successfully before running out of retries, its
      remaining retry counter will be reset to the initial value. If a retried
      task runs out of retries, it will be removed from the schedule.
      
      Tasks which need to be scheduled for a retry are still subject to weight
      metering and agenda space, same as a regular task. Periodic tasks will
      have their periodic schedule put on hold while the task is retrying.
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      9346019d
  3. Feb 15, 2024
  4. Feb 13, 2024
  5. Feb 09, 2024
  6. Feb 08, 2024
    • Gonçalo Pestana's avatar
      Fixes `TotalValueLocked` out of sync in nomination pools (#3052) · aac07af0
      Gonçalo Pestana authored
      The `TotalLockedValue` storage value in nomination pools pallet may get
      out of sync if the staking pallet does implicit withdrawal of unlocking
      chunks belonging to a bonded pool stash. This fix is based on a new
      method in the `OnStakingUpdate` traits, `on_withdraw`, which allows the
      nomination pools pallet to adjust the `TotalLockedValue` every time
      there is an implicit or explicit withdrawal from a bonded pool's stash.
      
      This PR also adds a migration that checks and updates the on-chain TVL
      if it got out of sync due to the bug this PR fixes.
      
      **Changes to `trait OnStakingUpdate`**
      
      In order for staking to notify the nomination pools pallet that chunks
      where withdrew, we add a new method, `on_withdraw` to the
      `OnStakingUpdate` trait. The nomination pools pallet filters the
      withdraws that are related to bonded pool accounts and updates the
      `TotalValueLocked` accordingly.
      
      **Others**
      - Adds try-state checks to the EPM/staking e2e tests
      - Adds tests for auto withdrawing in the context of nomination pools
      
      **To-do**
      - [x] check if we need a migration to fix the current `TotalValueLocked`
      (run try-runtime)
      - [x] migrations to fix the current on-chain TVL value 
      
        **Kusama**:
      ```
      TotalValueLocked: 99.4559 kKSM
      TotalValueLocked (calculated) 99.4559 kKSM
      ```
      ️ **Westend**:
      ```
      TotalValueLocked: 18.4060 kWND
      TotalValueLocked (calculated) 18.4050 kWND
      ```
      **Polkadot**: TVL not released yet.
      
      Closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3055
      
      
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarRoss Bulat <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDónal Murray <[email protected]>
      aac07af0
  7. Feb 06, 2024
  8. Jan 31, 2024
    • Branislav Kontur's avatar
      [frame] `#[pallet::composite_enum]` improved variant count handling + removed... · bb8ddc46
      Branislav Kontur authored
      [frame] `#[pallet::composite_enum]` improved variant count handling + removed `pallet_balances`'s `MaxHolds` config (#2657)
      
      I started this investigation/issue based on @liamaharon question
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1801#discussion_r1410452499).
      
      ## Problem
      
      The `pallet_balances` integrity test should correctly detect that the
      runtime has correct distinct `HoldReasons` variant count. I assume the
      same situation exists for RuntimeFreezeReason.
      
      It is not a critical problem, if we set `MaxHolds` with a sufficiently
      large value, everything should be ok. However, in this case, the
      integrity_test check becomes less useful.
      
      **Situation for "any" runtime:**
      - `HoldReason` enums from different pallets:
      ```rust
              /// from pallet_nis
              #[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason {
      		NftReceipt,
      	}
      
              /// from pallet_preimage
              #[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason {
      		Preimage,
      	}
      
              // from pallet_state-trie-migration
              #[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason {
      		SlashForContinueMigrate,
      		SlashForMigrateCustomTop,
      		SlashForMigrateCustomChild,
      	}
      ```
      
      - generated `RuntimeHoldReason` enum looks like:
      ```rust
      pub enum RuntimeHoldReason {
      
          #[codec(index = 32u8)]
          Preimage(pallet_preimage::HoldReason),
      
          #[codec(index = 38u8)]
          Nis(pallet_nis::HoldReason),
      
          #[codec(index = 42u8)]
          StateTrieMigration(pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason),
      }
      ```
      
      - composite enum `RuntimeHoldReason` variant count is detected as `3`
      - we set `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>`
      - `pallet_balances::integrity_test` is ok with `3`(at least 3)
      
      However, the real problem can occur in a live runtime where some
      functionality might stop working. This is due to a total of 5 distinct
      hold reasons (for pallets with multi-instance support, it is even more),
      and not all of them can be used because of an incorrect `MaxHolds`,
      which is deemed acceptable according to the `integrity_test`:
        ```
        // pseudo-code - if we try to call all of these:
      
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_nis::HoldReason::NftReceipt.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_preimage::HoldReason::Preimage.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
      
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForContinueMigrate.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
      
        // With `type MaxHolds = ConstU32<3>` these two will fail
      
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomTop.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
      
      T::Currency::hold(&pallet_state_trie_migration::HoldReason::SlashForMigrateCustomChild.into(),
      &nft_owner, deposit)?;
        ```  
      
      
      ## Solutions
      
      A macro `#[pallet::*]` expansion is extended of `VariantCount`
      implementation for the `#[pallet::composite_enum]` enum type. This
      expansion generates the `VariantCount` implementation for pallets'
      `HoldReason`, `FreezeReason`, `LockId`, and `SlashReason`. Enum variants
      must be plain enum values without fields to ensure a deterministic
      count.
      
      The composite runtime enum, `RuntimeHoldReason` and
      `RuntimeFreezeReason`, now sets `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT` as the sum
      of pallets' enum `VariantCount::VARIANT_COUNT`:
      ```rust
      #[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)]
      mod module_single_instance {
      
      	#[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason {
      		ModuleSingleInstanceReason1,
      		ModuleSingleInstanceReason2,
      	}
      ...
      }
      
      #[frame_support::pallet(dev_mode)]
      mod module_multi_instance {
      
      	#[pallet::composite_enum]
      	pub enum HoldReason<I: 'static = ()> {
      		ModuleMultiInstanceReason1,
      		ModuleMultiInstanceReason2,
      		ModuleMultiInstanceReason3,
      	}
      ...
      }
      
      
      impl self::sp_api_hidden_includes_construct_runtime::hidden_include::traits::VariantCount
          for RuntimeHoldReason
      {
          const VARIANT_COUNT: u32 = 0
              + module_single_instance::HoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT
              + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance1>::VARIANT_COUNT
              + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance2>::VARIANT_COUNT
              + module_multi_instance::HoldReason::<module_multi_instance::Instance3>::VARIANT_COUNT;
      }
      ```
      
      In addition, `MaxHolds` is removed (as suggested
      [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2657#discussion_r1443324573))
      from `pallet_balances`, and its `Holds` are now bounded to
      `RuntimeHoldReason::VARIANT_COUNT`. Therefore, there is no need to let
      the runtime specify `MaxHolds`.
      
      
      ## For reviewers
      
      Relevant changes can be found here:
      - `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/lib.rs` 
      -  `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/parse/composite.rs`
      -  `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/pallet/expand/composite.rs`
      -
      `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/composite_helper.rs`
      -
      `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/hold_reason.rs`
      -
      `substrate/frame/support/procedural/src/construct_runtime/expand/freeze_reason.rs`
      - `substrate/frame/support/src/traits/misc.rs`
      
      And the rest of the files is just about removed `MaxHolds` from
      `pallet_balances`
      
      ## Next steps
      
      Do the same for `MaxFreezes`
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2997
      
      .
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDónal Murray <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatargupnik <[email protected]>
      bb8ddc46
  9. Jan 30, 2024
  10. Jan 24, 2024
  11. Jan 23, 2024
  12. Jan 22, 2024
  13. Jan 18, 2024
  14. Jan 17, 2024
  15. Jan 16, 2024
    • Francisco Aguirre's avatar
      XCMv4 (#1230) · 8428f678
      Francisco Aguirre authored
      
      
      # Note for reviewer
      
      Most changes are just syntax changes necessary for the new version.
      Most important files should be the ones under the `xcm` folder.
      
      # Description 
      
      Added XCMv4.
      
      ## Removed `Multi` prefix
      The following types have been renamed:
      - MultiLocation -> Location
      - MultiAsset -> Asset
      - MultiAssets -> Assets
      - InteriorMultiLocation -> InteriorLocation
      - MultiAssetFilter -> AssetFilter
      - VersionedMultiAsset -> VersionedAsset
      - WildMultiAsset -> WildAsset
      - VersionedMultiLocation -> VersionedLocation
      
      In order to fix a name conflict, the `Assets` in `xcm-executor` were
      renamed to `HoldingAssets`, as they represent assets in holding.
      
      ## Removed `Abstract` asset id
      
      It was not being used anywhere and this simplifies the code.
      
      Now assets are just constructed as follows:
      
      ```rust
      let asset: Asset = (AssetId(Location::new(1, Here)), 100u128).into();
      ```
      
      No need for specifying `Concrete` anymore.
      
      ## Outcome is now a named fields struct
      
      Instead of
      
      ```rust
      pub enum Outcome {
        Complete(Weight),
        Incomplete(Weight, Error),
        Error(Error),
      }
      ```
      
      we now have
      
      ```rust
      pub enum Outcome {
        Complete { used: Weight },
        Incomplete { used: Weight, error: Error },
        Error { error: Error },
      }
      ```
      
      ## Added Reanchorable trait
      
      Now both locations and assets implement this trait, making it easier to
      reanchor both.
      
      ## New syntax for building locations and junctions
      
      Now junctions are built using the following methods:
      
      ```rust
      let location = Location {
          parents: 1,
          interior: [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)].into()
      };
      ```
      
      or
      
      ```rust
      let location = Location::new(1, [Parachain(1000), PalletInstance(50), GeneralIndex(1984)]);
      ```
      
      And they are matched like so:
      
      ```rust
      match location.unpack() {
        (1, [Parachain(id)]) => ...
        (0, Here) => ...,
        (1, [_]) => ...,
      }
      ```
      
      This syntax is mandatory in v4, and has been also implemented for v2 and
      v3 for easier migration.
      
      This was needed to make all sizes smaller.
      
      # TODO
      - [x] Scaffold v4
      - [x] Port github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7236
      - [x] Remove `Multi` prefix
      - [x] Remove `Abstract` asset id
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarKeith Yeung <[email protected]>
      8428f678
  16. Jan 10, 2024
    • joe petrowski's avatar
      Unique Usernames in Identity Pallet (#2651) · d1f678c0
      joe petrowski authored
      
      
      This PR allows _username authorities_ to issue unique usernames that
      correspond with an account. It also provides two-way lookup, that is
      from `AccountId` to a single, "primary" `Username` (alongside
      `Registration`) and multiple unique `Username`s to an `AccountId`.
      
      Key features:
      
      - Username Authorities added (and removed) via privileged origin.
      - Authorities have a `suffix` and an `allocation`. They can grant up to
      `allocation` usernames. Their `suffix` will be appended to the usernames
      that they issue. A suffix may be up to 7 characters long.
      - Users can ask an authority to grant them a username. This will take
      the form `myusername.suffix`. The entire name (including suffix) must be
      less than or equal to 32 alphanumeric characters.
      - Users can approve a username for themselves in one of two ways (that
      is, authorities cannot grant them arbitrarily):
      - Pre-sign the entire username (including suffix) with a secret key that
      corresponds to their `AccountId` (for keyed accounts, obviously); or
      - Accept the username after it has been granted by an authority (it will
      be queued until accepted) (for non-keyed accounts like pure proxies or
      multisigs).
      - The system does not require any funds or deposits. Users without an
      identity will be given a default one (presumably all fields set to
      `None`). If they update this info, they will need to place the normal
      storage deposit.
      - If a user does not have any username, their first one will be set as
      `Primary`, and their `AccountId` will map to that one. If they get
      subsequent usernames, they can choose which one to be their primary via
      `set_primary_username`.
      - There are some state cleanup functions to remove expired usernames
      that have not been accepted and dangling usernames whose owners have
      called `clear_identity`.
      
      TODO:
      
      - [x] Add migration to runtimes
      - [x] Probably do off-chain migration into People Chain genesis
      - [x] Address a few TODO questions in code (please review)
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarLiam Aharon <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarGonçalo Pestana <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarOliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarDónal Murray <[email protected]>
      d1f678c0
  17. Jan 06, 2024
  18. Dec 22, 2023
  19. Dec 21, 2023
  20. Dec 20, 2023
    • joe petrowski's avatar
      Add Authorize Upgrade Pattern to Frame System (#2682) · 280aa0b5
      joe petrowski authored
      Adds the `authorize_upgrade` -> `enact_authorized_upgrade` pattern to
      `frame-system`. This will be useful for upgrading bridged chains that
      are under the governance of Polkadot without passing entire runtime Wasm
      blobs over a bridge.
      
      Notes:
      
      - Changed `enact_authorized_upgrade` to `apply_authorized_upgrade`.
      Personal opinion, "apply" more accurately expresses what it's doing. Can
      change back if outvoted.
      - Remove `check_version` in favor of two extrinsics, so as to make
      _checked_ the default.
      - Left calls in `parachain-system` and marked as deprecated to prevent
      breaking the API. They just call into the `frame-system` functions.
      - Updated `frame-system` benchmarks to v2 syntax.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      280aa0b5
  21. Dec 15, 2023
  22. Dec 14, 2023
    • Francisco Aguirre's avatar
      Add FungibleAdapter (#2684) · 10a91f82
      Francisco Aguirre authored
      In the move from the old `Currency` traits to the new `fungible/s`
      family of traits, we already had the `FungiblesAdapter` and
      `NonFungiblesAdapter` for multiple fungible and non fungible assets
      respectively. However, for handling only one fungible asset, we were
      missing a `FungibleAdapter`, and so used the old `CurrencyAdapter`
      instead. This PR aims to fill in that gap, and provide the new adapter
      for more updated examples.
      
      I marked the old `CurrencyAdapter` as deprecated as part of this PR, and
      I'll change it to the new `FungibleAdapter` in a following PR.
      The two stages are separated so as to not bloat this PR with some name
      fixes in tests.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      10a91f82
    • Egor_P's avatar
      [Backport] txn version bump from 1.5.0 (#2709) · 3e4e8c0b
      Egor_P authored
      This PR backports `transaction_version` bump from `1.5.0` release back
      to `master`
      3e4e8c0b
  23. Dec 13, 2023
    • Alexandru Gheorghe's avatar
      Approve multiple candidates with a single signature (#1191) · a84dd0db
      Alexandru Gheorghe authored
      Initial implementation for the plan discussed here: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/701
      Built on top of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/1178
      v0: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/7554,
      
      ## Overall idea
      
      When approval-voting checks a candidate and is ready to advertise the
      approval, defer it in a per-relay chain block until we either have
      MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT candidates to sign or a candidate has stayed
      MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS in the queue, in both cases we sign what
      candidates we have available.
      
      This should allow us to reduce the number of approvals messages we have
      to create/send/verify. The parameters are configurable, so we should
      find some values that balance:
      
      - Security of the network: Delaying broadcasting of an approval
      shouldn't but the finality at risk and to make sure that never happens
      we won't delay sending a vote if we are past 2/3 from the no-show time.
      - Scalability of the network: MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT = 1 &
      MAX_APPROVALS_COALESCE_TICKS =0, is what we have now and we know from
      the measurements we did on versi, it bottlenecks
      approval-distribution/approval-voting when increase significantly the
      number of validators and parachains
      - Block storage: In case of disputes we have to import this votes on
      chain and that increase the necessary storage with
      MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT * CandidateHash per vote. Given that
      disputes are not the normal way of the network functioning and we will
      limit MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT in the single digits numbers, this
      should be good enough. Alternatively, we could try to create a better
      way to store this on-chain through indirection, if that's needed.
      
      ## Other fixes:
      - Fixed the fact that we were sending random assignments to
      non-validators, that was wrong because those won't do anything with it
      and they won't gossip it either because they do not have a grid topology
      set, so we would waste the random assignments.
      - Added metrics to be able to debug potential no-shows and
      mis-processing of approvals/assignments.
      
      ## TODO:
      - [x] Get feedback, that this is moving in the right direction. @ordian
      @sandreim @eskimor @burdges, let me know what you think.
      - [x] More and more testing.
      - [x]  Test in versi.
      - [x] Make MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_COUNT &
      MAX_APPROVAL_COALESCE_WAIT_MILLIS a parachain host configuration.
      - [x] Make sure the backwards compatibility works correctly
      - [x] Make sure this direction is compatible with other streams of work:
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/635 &
      https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/742
      
      
      - [x] Final versi burn-in before merging
      
      ---------
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
      a84dd0db
  24. Dec 12, 2023
    • Chevdor's avatar
      Changelogs local generation (#1411) · 42a3afba
      Chevdor authored
      
      
      This PR introduces a script and some templates to use the prdoc involved
      in a release and build:
      - the changelog
      - a simple draft of audience documentation
      
      Since the prdoc presence was enforced in the middle of the version
      1.5.0, not all PRs did come with a `prdoc` file.
      This PR creates all the missing `prdoc` files with some minimum content
      allowing to properly generate the changelog.
      The generated content is **not** suitable for the audience
      documentation.
      
      The audience documentation will be possible with the next version, when
      all PR come with a proper `prdoc`.
      
      ## Assumptions
      
      - the prdoc files for release `vX.Y.Z` have been moved under
      `prdoc/X.Y.Z`
      - the changelog requires for now for the prdoc files to contain author +
      topic. Thos fields are optional.
      
      The build script can  be called as:
      ```
      VERSION=X.Y.Z ./scripts/release/build-changelogs.sh
      ```
      
      Related:
      -  #1408
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarEgorPopelyaev <[email protected]>
      42a3afba
    • Ross Bulat's avatar
      Staking: Add `deprecate_controller_batch` AdminOrigin call (#2589) · 048a9c27
      Ross Bulat authored
      
      
      Partially Addresses #2500
      
      Adds a `deprecate_controller_batch` call to the staking pallet that is
      callable by `Root` and `StakingAdmin`. To be used for controller account
      deprecation and removed thereafter. Adds
      `MaxControllersDeprecationBatch` pallet constant that defines max
      possible deprecations per call.
      
      - [x] Add `deprecate_controller_batch` call, and
      `MaxControllersInDeprecationBatch` constant.
      - [x] Add tests, benchmark, weights. Tests that weight is only consumed
      if unique pair.
      - [x] Adds `StakingAdmin` origin to staking's `AdminOrigin` type in
      westend runtime.
      - [x] Determined that worst case 5,900 deprecations does fit into
      `maxBlock` `proofSize` and `refTime` in both normal and operational
      thresholds, meaning we can deprecate all controllers for each network in
      one call.
      
      ## Block Weights
      
      By querying `consts.system.blockWeights` we can see that the
      `deprecate_controller_batch` weights fit within the `normal` threshold
      on Polkadot.
      
      #### `controller_deprecation_batch` where i = 5900:
      #### Ref time: 69,933,325,300
      #### Proof size: 21,040,390
      
      ### Polkadot 
      
      ```
      // consts.query.blockWeights
      
      maxBlock: {
              refTime: 2,000,000,000,000
              proofSize: 18,446,744,073,709,551,615
      }
      normal: {
       maxExtrinsic: {
      	refTime: 1,479,873,955,000
      	proofSize: 13,650,590,614,545,068,195
       }
       maxTotal: {
      	refTime: 1,500,000,000,000
      	proofSize: 13,835,058,055,282,163,711
       }
      }
      ```
      
      ### Kusama
      
      ```
      // consts.query.blockWeights
      
        maxBlock: {
          refTime: 2,000,000,000,000
          proofSize: 18,446,744,073,709,551,615
        }
          normal: {
            maxExtrinsic: {
              refTime: 1,479,875,294,000
              proofSize: 13,650,590,614,545,068,195
            }
            maxTotal: {
              refTime: 1,500,000,000,000
              proofSize: 13,835,058,055,282,163,711
            }
      }
      ```
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarGonçalo Pestana <[email protected]>
      048a9c27
  25. Dec 11, 2023
  26. Dec 08, 2023
    • Muharem Ismailov's avatar
      Westend: Fellowship Treasury (#2532) · da40d97a
      Muharem Ismailov authored
      
      
      Treasury Pallet Instance for the Fellowship in Westend Collectives.
      
      In this update, we present a Treasury Pallet Instance that is under the
      control of the Fellowship body, with oversight from the Root and
      Treasurer origins. Here's how it is governed:
      - the Root origin have the authority to reject or approve spend
      proposals, with no amount limit for approvals.
      - the Treasurer origin have the authority to reject or approve spend
      proposals, with approval limits of up to 10,000,000 DOT.
      - Voice of all Fellows ranked at 3 or above can reject or approve spend
      proposals, with a maximum approval limit of 10,000 DOT.
      - Voice of Fellows ranked at 4 or above can also reject or approve spend
      proposals, with a maximum approval limit of 10,000,000 DOT.
      
      Additionally, we introduce the Asset Rate Pallet Instance to establish
      conversion rates from asset A to B. This is used to determine if a
      proposed spend amount involving a non-native asset is permissible by the
      commanding origin. The rates can be set up by the Root, Treasurer
      origins, or Voice of all Fellows.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarjoe petrowski <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarjoepetrowski <[email protected]>
      da40d97a
  27. Dec 07, 2023
  28. Dec 06, 2023
    • Adrian Catangiu's avatar
      pallet-xcm: add new flexible `transfer_assets()` call/extrinsic (#2388) · e7651cf4
      Adrian Catangiu authored
      # Motivation (+testing)
      
      ### Enable easy `ForeignAssets` transfers using `pallet-xcm` 
      
      We had just previously added capabilities to teleport fees during
      reserve-based transfers, but what about reserve-transferring fees when
      needing to teleport some non-fee asset?
      
      This PR aligns everything under either explicit reserve-transfer,
      explicit teleport, or this new flexible `transfer_assets()` which can
      mix and match as needed with fewer artificial constraints imposed to the
      user.
      
      This will enable, for example, a (non-system) parachain to teleport
      their `ForeignAssets` assets to AssetHub while using DOT to pay fees.
      (the assets are teleported - as foreign assets should from their owner
      chain - while DOT used for fees can only be reserve-based transferred
      between said parachain and AssetHub).
      
      Added `xcm-emulator` tests for this scenario ^.
      
      # Description
      
      Reverts `(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets` to only allow reserve-based
      transfers for all `assets` including fees.
      
      Similarly `(limited_)teleport_assets` only allows teleports for all
      `assets` including fees.
          
      For complex combinations of asset transfers where assets and fees may
      have different reserves or different reserve/teleport trust
      configurations, users can use the newly added `transfer_assets()`
      extrinsic which is more flexible in allowing more complex scenarios.
      
      `assets` (excluding `fees`) must have same reserve location or otherwise
      be teleportable to `dest`.
      No limitations imposed on `fees`.
      
      - for local reserve: transfer assets to sovereign account of destination
      chain and forward a notification XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit
      reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`.
      - for destination reserve: burn local assets and forward a notification
      to `dest` chain to withdraw the reserve assets from this chain's
      sovereign account and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
      - for remote reserve: burn local assets, forward XCM to reserve chain to
      move reserves from this chain's SA to `dest` chain's SA, and forward
      another XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to
      `beneficiary`.
      - for teleports: burn local assets and forward XCM to `dest` chain to
      mint/teleport assets and deposit them to `beneficiary`.
      
      ## Review notes
      
      Only around 500 lines are prod code (see `pallet_xcm/src/lib.rs`), the
      rest of the PR is new tests and improving existing tests.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      e7651cf4
  29. Dec 05, 2023
  30. Nov 30, 2023
  31. Nov 29, 2023
  32. Nov 28, 2023
    • s0me0ne-unkn0wn's avatar
    • Ross Bulat's avatar
      Pools: Add ability to configure commission claiming permissions (#2474) · 75062717
      Ross Bulat authored
      Addresses #409.
      
      This request has been raised by multiple community members - the ability
      for the nomination pool root role to configure permissionless commission
      claiming:
      
      > Would it be possible to have a claim_commission_other extrinsic for
      claiming commission of nomination pools permissionless?
      
      This PR does not quite introduce this additional call, but amends
      `do_claim_commission` to check a new `claim_permission` field in the
      `Commission` struct, configured by an enum:
      
      ```
      enum CommissionClaimPermission {
         Permissionless,
         Account(AccountId),
      }
      ```
      This can be optionally set in a bonded pool's
      `commission.claim_permission` field:
      
      ```
      struct BondedPool {
         commission: {
            <snip>
            claim_permission: Option<CommissionClaimPermission<T::AccountId>>,
         },
         <snip>
      }
      ```
      
      This is a new field and requires a migration to add it to existing
      pools. This will be `None` on pool creation, falling back to the `root`
      role having sole access to claim commission if it is not set; this is
      the behaviour as it is today. Once set, the field _can_ be set to `None`
      again.
      
      #### Changes
      - [x] Add `commision.claim_permission` field.
      - [x] Add `can_claim_commission` and amend `do_claim_commission`.
      - [x] Add `set_commission_claim_permission` call.
      - [x] Test to cover new configs and call.
      - [x] Add and amend benchmarks.
      - [x] Generate new weights + slot into call
      `set_commission_claim_permission`.
      - [x] Add migration to introduce `commission.claim_permission`, bump
      storage version.
      - [x] Update Westend weights.
      - [x] Migration working.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      75062717
  33. Nov 27, 2023
  34. Nov 22, 2023
    • Ross Bulat's avatar
      Deprecate `RewardDestination::Controller` (#2380) · 7a32f4be
      Ross Bulat authored
      
      
      Deprecates `RewardDestination::Controller` variant.
      
      - [x] `RewardDestination::Controller` annotated with `#[deprecated]`.
      - [x] `Controller` variant is now handled the same way as `Stash` in
      `payout_stakers`.
      - [x] `set_payee` errors if `RewardDestination::Controller` is provided.
      - [x] Added `update_payee` call to lazily migrate
      `RewardDestination::Controller` `Payee` storage entries to
      `RewardDestination::Account(controller)` .
      - [x] `payout_stakers_dead_controller` has been removed from benches &
      weights - was not used.
      - [x] Tests no longer use `RewardDestination::Controller`.
      
      ---------
      
      Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarGonçalo Pestana <[email protected]>
      Co-authored-by: default avatargeorgepisaltu <[email protected]>
      7a32f4be
  35. Nov 17, 2023
  36. Nov 16, 2023