- Jan 14, 2025
-
-
Muharem Ismailov authored
-
- Jan 13, 2025
-
-
polka.dom authored
As per #3326, removes pallet::getter macro usage from pallet-grandpa. The syntax `StorageItem::<T, I>::get()` should be used instead. cc @muraca --------- Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
-
PG Herveou authored
Update the current approach to attach the `ref_time`, `pov` and `deposit` parameters to an Ethereum transaction. Previously we will pass these 3 parameters along with the signed payload, and check that the fees resulting from `gas x gas_price` match the actual fees paid by the user for the extrinsic. This approach unfortunately can be attacked. A malicious actor could force such a transaction to fail by injecting low values for some of these extra parameters as they are not part of the signed payload. The new approach encodes these 3 extra parameters in the lower digits of the transaction gas, approximating the the log2 of the actual values to encode each components on 2 digits --------- Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Jan 05, 2025
-
-
thiolliere authored
Implement cumulus StorageWeightReclaim as wrapping transaction extension + frame system ReclaimWeight (#6140) (rebasing of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5234) ## Issues: * Transaction extensions have weights and refund weight. So the reclaiming of unused weight must happen last in the transaction extension pipeline. Currently it is inside `CheckWeight`. * cumulus storage weight reclaim transaction extension misses the proof size of logic happening prior to itself. ## Done: * a new storage `ExtrinsicWeightReclaimed` in frame-system. Any logic which attempts to do some reclaim must use this storage to avoid double reclaim. * a new function `reclaim_weight` in frame-system pallet: info and post info in arguments, read the already reclaimed weight, calculate the new unused weight from info and post info. do the more accurate reclaim if higher. * `CheckWeight` is unchanged and still reclaim the weight in post dispatch * `ReclaimWeight` is a new transaction extension in frame system. For s...
-
- Dec 22, 2024
-
-
Xavier Lau authored
Make pallet-recovery supports `BlockNumberProvider`. Part of #6297. --- Polkadot address: 156HGo9setPcU2qhFMVWLkcmtCEGySLwNqa3DaEiYSWtte4Y --------- Co-authored-by:
Guillaume Thiolliere <guillaume.thiolliere@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com>
-
Muharem Ismailov authored
-
- Dec 01, 2024
-
-
PG Herveou authored
* Add a bunch of differential tests to ensure that responses from eth-rpc matches the one from `geth` - These [tests](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/pg/fix-geth-diff/substrate/frame/revive/rpc/examples/js/src/geth-diff.test.ts) are not run in CI for now but can be run locally with ```bash cd revive/rpc/examples/js bun test ``` * EVM RPC server will not fail gas_estimation if no gas is specified, I updated pallet-revive to add an extra `skip_transfer` boolean check to replicate this behavior in our pallet * `eth_transact` and `bare_eth_transact` api have been updated to use `GenericTransaction` directly as this is what is used by `eth_estimateGas` and `eth_call` ## TODO - [ ] Add tests the new `skip_transfer` flag --------- Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by:
Alexander Theißen <alex.theissen@me.com>
-
- Nov 25, 2024
-
-
Muharem Ismailov authored
-
Muharem Ismailov authored
-
- Nov 22, 2024
-
-
gupnik authored
Step in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3268 This PR adds the ability for these pallets to specify their source of the block number. This is useful when these pallets are migrated from the relay chain to a parachain and vice versa. This change is backwards compatible: 1. If the `BlockNumberProvider` continues to use the system pallet's block number 2. When a pallet deployed on the relay chain is moved to a parachain, but still uses the relay chain's block number However, we would need migrations if the deployed pallets are upgraded on an existing parachain, and the `BlockNumberProvider` uses the relay chain block number. --------- Co-authored-by:
Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com>
-
- Nov 19, 2024
-
-
Maciej authored
Aims to implement Stage 3 of Validator Disbling as outlined here: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4359 Features: - [x] New Disabling Strategy (Staking level) - [x] Re-enabling logic (Session level) - [x] More generic disabling decision output - [x] New Disabling Events Testing & Security: - [x] Unit tests - [x] Mock tests - [x] Try-runtime checks - [x] Try-runtime tested on westend snap - [x] Try-runtime CI tests - [ ] Re-enabling Zombienet Test (?) - [ ] SRLabs Audit Closes #4745 Closes #2418 --------- Co-authored-by:
ordian <write@reusable.software> Co-authored-by:
Ankan <10196091+Ank4n@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
Tsvetomir Dimitrov <tsvetomir@parity.io>
-
- Nov 15, 2024
-
-
PG Herveou authored
This PR update the pallet to use the EVM 18 decimal balance in contracts call and host functions instead of the native balance. It also updates the js example to add the piggy-bank solidity contract that expose the problem --------- Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com>
-
- Nov 11, 2024
-
-
Muharem Ismailov authored
-
- Nov 08, 2024
-
-
Muharem Ismailov authored
-
- Nov 07, 2024
-
-
Muharem Ismailov authored
-
Muharem Ismailov authored
-
- Nov 06, 2024
-
-
Ankan authored
closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/6358 Adds the following runtime api to pallet-nomination-pools. `pool_accounts(pool_id)`: Returns `(bonded_account, reward_account)` associated with the `pool_id`. cc: @rossbulat --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
-
- Nov 05, 2024
-
-
Nazar Mokrynskyi authored
Remove `sp_runtime::RuntimeString` and replace with `Cow<'static, str>` or `String` depending on use case (#5693) # Description As described in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4001 `RuntimeVersion` was not encoded consistently using serde. Turned out it was a remnant of old times and no longer actually needed. As such I removed it completely in this PR and replaced with `Cow<'static, str>` for spec/impl names and `String` for error cases. Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4001. ## Integration For downstream projects the upgrade will primarily consist of following two changes: ```diff #[sp_version::runtime_version] pub const VERSION: RuntimeVersion = RuntimeVersion { - spec_name: create_runtime_str!("statemine"), - impl_name: create_runtime_str!("statemine"), + spec_name: alloc::borrow::Cow::Borrowed("statemine"), + impl_name: alloc::borrow::Cow::Borrowed("statemine"), ``` ```diff fn dispatch_benchmark( config: frame_benchmarking::BenchmarkConfig - ) -> Result<Vec<frame_benchmarking::BenchmarkBatch>, sp_runtime::RuntimeString> { + ) -> Result<Vec<frame_benchmarking::BenchmarkBatch>, alloc::string::String> { ``` SCALE encoding/decoding remains the same as before, but serde encoding in runtime has changed from bytes to string (it was like this in `std` environment already), which most projects shouldn't have issues with. I consider the impact of serde encoding here low due to the type only being used in runtime version struct and mostly limited to runtime internals, where serde encoding/decoding of this data structure is quite unlikely (though we did hit exactly this edge-case ourselves
). ## Review Notes Most of the changes are trivial and mechanical, the only non-trivial change is in `substrate/primitives/version/proc-macro/src/decl_runtime_version.rs` where macro call expectation in `sp_version::runtime_version` implementation was replaced with function call expectation. # Checklist * [x] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the "Description" and its two subsections above. * [ ] My PR follows the [labeling requirements]( https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/docs/contributor/CONTRIBUTING.md#Process ) of this project (at minimum one label for `T` required) * External contributors: ask maintainers to put the right label on your PR. * [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if applicable) --------- Co-authored-by:GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by:
Guillaume Thiolliere <guillaume.thiolliere@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <info@kchr.de>
-
davidk-pt authored
Resolves https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/5930 `spend_local` from `treasury` pallet and associated types are deprecated. `spend_local` was being used before with native currency in the treasury. This PR provides a documentation on how to migrate to the `spend` call instead. ### Migration #### For users who were using only `spend_local` before To replace `spend_local` functionality configure `Paymaster` pallet configuration to be `PayFromAccount` and configure `AssetKind` to be `()` and use `spend` call instead. This way `spend` call will function as deprecated `spend_local`. Example: ``` impl pallet_treasury::Config for Runtime { .. type AssetKind = (); type Paymaster = PayFromAccount<Self::Currency, TreasuryAccount>; // convert balance 1:1 ratio with native currency type BalanceConverter = UnityAssetBalanceConversion; .. } ``` #### For users who were already using `spend` with all other assets, except the native asset Use `NativeOrWithId` type for `AssetKind` and have a `UnionOf` for native and non-native assets, then use that with `PayAssetFromAccount`. Example from `kitchensink-runtime`: ``` // Union of native currency and assets pub type NativeAndAssets = UnionOf<Balances, Assets, NativeFromLeft, NativeOrWithId<u32>, AccountId>; impl pallet_treasury::Config for Runtime { .. type AssetKind = NativeOrWithId<u32>; type Paymaster = PayAssetFromAccount<NativeAndAssets, TreasuryAccount>; type BalanceConverter = AssetRate; .. } // AssetRate pallet configuration impl pallet_asset_rate::Config for Runtime { .. type Currency = Balances; type AssetKind = NativeOrWithId<u32>; .. } ``` --------- Co-authored-by:
DavidK <davidk@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Muharem <ismailov.m.h@gmail.com>
-
- Nov 04, 2024
-
-
Cyrill Leutwiler authored
This PR removes the `transfer` syscall and changes balance transfers to make the existential deposit (ED) fully transparent for contracts. The `transfer` API is removed since there is no corresponding EVM opcode and transferring via a call introduces barely any overhead. We make the ED transparent to contracts by transferring the ED from the call origin to nonexistent accounts. Without this change, transfers to nonexistant accounts will transfer the supplied value minus the ED from the contracts viewpoint, and consequentially fail if the supplied value lies below the ED. Changing this behavior removes the need for contract code to handle this rather annoying corner case and aligns better with the EVM. The EVM charges a similar deposit from the gas meter, so transferring the ED from the call origin is practically the same as the call origin pays for gas. --------- Signed-off-by:
xermicus <cyrill@parity.io> Signed-off-by:
Cyrill Leutwiler <bigcyrill@hotmail.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by:
PG Herveou <pgherveou@gmail.com>
-
PG Herveou authored
Various fixes for the release of eth-rpc & ah-westend-runtime - Bump asset-hub westend spec version - Fix the status of the Receipt to properly report failed transactions - Fix value conversion between native and eth decimal representation --------- Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com>
-
- Nov 01, 2024
-
-
Shawn Tabrizi authored
The goal of this PR is to have the treasury pallet work on a parachain which does not produce blocks on a regular schedule, thus can use the relay chain as a block provider. Because blocks are not produced regularly, we cannot make the assumption that block number increases monotonically, and thus have new logic to handle multiple spend periods passing between blocks. --------- Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by:
Muharem <ismailov.m.h@gmail.com>
-
- Oct 29, 2024
-
-
georgepisaltu authored
This PR refactors `pallet-identity` to decouple usernames from identities. Main changes in this PR: - Separate usernames from identities in storage, allowing for correct deposit accounting - Introduce the option for username authorities to put up a deposit to issue a username - Allow authorities to remove usernames by declaring the intent to do so, then removing the username after the grace period expires - Refactor the authority storage to be keyed by suffix rather than owner account. - Introduce the concept of a system provider for a username, different from a governance allocation, allowing for usernames set by the system and not a specific authority - Implement multi-block migration to enable all of the changes described above --------- Signed-off-by:
georgepisaltu <george.pisaltu@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Ankan <10196091+Ank4n@users.noreply.github.com>
-
- Oct 28, 2024
-
-
PG Herveou authored
Redo of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5953 --------- Co-authored-by:
Alexander Theißen <alex.theissen@me.com> Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com>
-
- Oct 25, 2024
-
-
Alexander Theißen authored
Fixes #5576 This allows contracts to be used with an AccountId32 through normal extrinsics and not only through the eth compat layer. It works by adding a new extrinsic `map_account` that lets people register their AccountId32. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by:
Cyrill Leutwiler <cyrill@parity.io>
-
- Oct 22, 2024
-
-
PG Herveou authored
This PR introduces the necessary changes to pallet-revive for integrating with our Ethereum JSON-RPC. The RPC proxy itself will be added in a follow up. ## Changes - A new pallet::call `Call::eth_transact`. This is used as a wrapper to accept unsigned Ethereum transaction, valid call will be routed to `Call::call` or `Call::instantiate_with_code` - A custom UncheckedExtrinsic struct, that wraps the generic one usually and add the ability to check eth_transact calls sent from an Ethereum JSON-RPC proxy. - Generated types and traits to support implementing a JSON-RPC Ethereum proxy. ## Flow Overview: - A user submits a transaction via MetaMask or another Ethereum-compatible wallet. - The proxy dry run the transaction and add metadata to the call (gas limit in Weight, storage deposit limit, and length of bytecode and constructor input for contract instantiation) - The raw transaction, along with the additional metadata, is submitted to the node as an unsigned extrinsic. - On the runtime, our custom UncheckedExtrinsic define a custom Checkable implementation that converts the unsigned extrinsics into checked one - It recovers the signer - validates the payload, and injects signed extensions, allowing the system to increment the nonce and charge the appropriate fees. - re-route the call to pallet-revive::Call::call or pallet-revive::Call::instantiateWithCode ## Dependencies - https://github.com/koute/polkavm/pull/188 ## Follow up PRs - #5926 - #6147 (previously #5953) - #5502 --------- Co-authored-by:
Alexander Theißen <alex.theissen@me.com> Co-authored-by:
Cyrill Leutwiler <cyrill@parity.io>
-
- Oct 18, 2024
-
-
georgepisaltu authored
Original PR https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2280 reverted in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3665 This PR reintroduces the reverted functionality with additional changes, related effort [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3623). Description is copied over from the original PR First part of [Extrinsic Horizon](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2415) Introduces a new trait `TransactionExtension` to replace `SignedExtension`. Introduce the idea of transactions which obey the runtime's extensions and have according Extension data (né Extra data) yet do not have hard-coded signatures. Deprecate the terminology of "Unsigned" when used for transactions/extrinsics owing to there now being "proper" unsigned transactions which obey the extension framework and "old-style" unsigned which do not. Instead we have __*General*__ for the former and __*Bare*__ for the latter. (Ultimately, the latter will be phased out as a type of transaction, and Bare will only be used for Inherents.) Types of extrinsic are now therefore: - Bare (no hardcoded signature, no Extra data; used to be known as "Unsigned") - Bare transactions (deprecated): Gossiped, validated with `ValidateUnsigned` (deprecated) and the `_bare_compat` bits of `TransactionExtension` (deprecated). - Inherents: Not gossiped, validated with `ProvideInherent`. - Extended (Extra data): Gossiped, validated via `TransactionExtension`. - Signed transactions (with a hardcoded signature) in extrinsic v4. - General transactions (without a hardcoded signature) in extrinsic v5. `TransactionExtension` differs from `SignedExtension` because: - A signature on the underlying transaction may validly not be present. - It may alter the origin during validation. - `pre_dispatch` is renamed to `prepare` and need not contain the checks present in `validate`. - `validate` and `prepare` is passed an `Origin` rather than a `AccountId`. - `validate` may pass arbitrary information into `prepare` via a new user-specifiable type `Val`. - `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to `Implicit`/`implicit`. It is encoded *for the entire transaction* and passed in to each extension as a new argument to `validate`. This facilitates the ability of extensions to acts as underlying crypto. There is a new `DispatchTransaction` trait which contains only default function impls and is impl'ed for any `TransactionExtension` impler. It provides several utility functions which reduce some of the tedium from using `TransactionExtension` (indeed, none of its regular functions should now need to be called directly). Three transaction version discriminator ("versions") are now permissible (RFC [here](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/RFCs/pull/84)) in extrinsic version 5: - 0b00000100 or 0b00000101: Bare (used to be called "Unsigned"): contains Signature or Extra (extension data). After bare transactions are no longer supported, this will strictly identify an Inherents only. Available in both extrinsic versions 4 and 5. - 0b10000100: Old-school "Signed" Transaction: contains Signature, Extra (extension data) and an extension version byte, introduced as part of [RFC99](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/RFCs/blob/main/text/0099-transaction-extension-version.md). Still available as part of extrinsic v4. - 0b01000101: New-school "General" Transaction: contains Extra (extension data) and an extension version byte, as per RFC99, but no Signature. Only available in extrinsic v5. For the New-school General Transaction, it becomes trivial for authors to publish extensions to the mechanism for authorizing an Origin, e.g. through new kinds of key-signing schemes, ZK proofs, pallet state, mutations over pre-authenticated origins or any combination of the above. `UncheckedExtrinsic` still maintains encode/decode backwards compatibility with extrinsic version 4, where the first byte was encoded as: - 0b00000100 - Unsigned transactions - 0b10000100 - Old-school Signed transactions, without the extension version byte Now, `UncheckedExtrinsic` contains a `Preamble` and the actual call. The `Preamble` describes the type of extrinsic as follows: ```rust /// A "header" for extrinsics leading up to the call itself. Determines the type of extrinsic and /// holds any necessary specialized data. #[derive(Eq, PartialEq, Clone)] pub enum Preamble<Address, Signature, Extension> { /// An extrinsic without a signature or any extension. This means it's either an inherent or /// an old-school "Unsigned" (we don't use that terminology any more since it's confusable with /// the general transaction which is without a signature but does have an extension). /// /// NOTE: In the future, once we remove `ValidateUnsigned`, this will only serve Inherent /// extrinsics and thus can be renamed to `Inherent`. Bare(ExtrinsicVersion), /// An old-school transaction extrinsic which includes a signature of some hard-coded crypto. /// Available only on extrinsic version 4. Signed(Address, Signature, ExtensionVersion, Extension), /// A new-school transaction extrinsic which does not include a signature by default. The /// origin authorization, through signatures or other means, is performed by the transaction /// extension in this extrinsic. Available starting with extrinsic version 5. General(ExtensionVersion, Extension), } ``` ## Code Migration ### NOW: Getting it to build Wrap your `SignedExtension`s in `AsTransactionExtension`. This should be accompanied by renaming your aggregate type in line with the new terminology. E.g. Before: ```rust /// The SignedExtension to the basic transaction logic. pub type SignedExtra = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension, ); /// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime. pub type UncheckedExtrinsic = generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, SignedExtra>; ``` After: ```rust /// The extension to the basic transaction logic. pub type TxExtension = ( /* snip */ AsTransactionExtension<MySpecialSignedExtension>, ); /// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime. pub type UncheckedExtrinsic = generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, TxExtension>; ``` You'll also need to alter any transaction building logic to add a `.into()` to make the conversion happen. E.g. Before: ```rust fn construct_extrinsic( /* snip */ ) -> UncheckedExtrinsic { let extra: SignedExtra = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */), ); let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), extra.clone()).unwrap(); let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e)); UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed( /* snip */ Signature::Sr25519(signature), extra, ) } ``` After: ```rust fn construct_extrinsic( /* snip */ ) -> UncheckedExtrinsic { let tx_ext: TxExtension = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */).into(), ); let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), tx_ext.clone()).unwrap(); let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e)); UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed( /* snip */ Signature::Sr25519(signature), tx_ext, ) } ``` ### SOON: Migrating to `TransactionExtension` Most `SignedExtension`s can be trivially converted to become a `TransactionExtension`. There are a few things to know. - Instead of a single trait like `SignedExtension`, you should now implement two traits individually: `TransactionExtensionBase` and `TransactionExtension`. - Weights are now a thing and must be provided via the new function `fn weight`. #### `TransactionExtensionBase` This trait takes care of anything which is not dependent on types specific to your runtime, most notably `Call`. - `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to `Implicit`/`implicit`. - Weight must be returned by implementing the `weight` function. If your extension is associated with a pallet, you'll probably want to do this via the pallet's existing benchmarking infrastructure. #### `TransactionExtension` Generally: - `pre_dispatch` is now `prepare` and you *should not reexecute the `validate` functionality in there*! - You don't get an account ID any more; you get an origin instead. If you need to presume an account ID, then you can use the trait function `AsSystemOriginSigner::as_system_origin_signer`. - You get an additional ticket, similar to `Pre`, called `Val`. This defines data which is passed from `validate` into `prepare`. This is important since you should not be duplicating logic from `validate` to `prepare`, you need a way of passing your working from the former into the latter. This is it. - This trait takes a `Call` type parameter. `Call` is the runtime call type which used to be an associated type; you can just move it to become a type parameter for your trait impl. - There's no `AccountId` associated type any more. Just remove it. Regarding `validate`: - You get three new parameters in `validate`; all can be ignored when migrating from `SignedExtension`. - `validate` returns a tuple on success; the second item in the tuple is the new ticket type `Self::Val` which gets passed in to `prepare`. If you use any information extracted during `validate` (off-chain and on-chain, non-mutating) in `prepare` (on-chain, mutating) then you can pass it through with this. For the tuple's last item, just return the `origin` argument. Regarding `prepare`: - This is renamed from `pre_dispatch`, but there is one change: - FUNCTIONALITY TO VALIDATE THE TRANSACTION NEED NOT BE DUPLICATED FROM `validate`!! - (This is different to `SignedExtension` which was required to run the same checks in `pre_dispatch` as in `validate`.) Regarding `post_dispatch`: - Since there are no unsigned transactions handled by `TransactionExtension`, `Pre` is always defined, so the first parameter is `Self::Pre` rather than `Option<Self::Pre>`. If you make use of `SignedExtension::validate_unsigned` or `SignedExtension::pre_dispatch_unsigned`, then: - Just use the regular versions of these functions instead. - Have your logic execute in the case that the `origin` is `None`. - Ensure your transaction creation logic creates a General Transaction rather than a Bare Transaction; this means having to include all `TransactionExtension`s' data. - `ValidateUnsigned` can still be used (for now) if you need to be able to construct transactions which contain none of the extension data, however these will be phased out in stage 2 of the Transactions Horizon, so you should consider moving to an extension-centric design. --------- Signed-off-by:
georgepisaltu <george.pisaltu@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Guillaume Thiolliere <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
-
- Oct 11, 2024
-
-
Maksym H authored
### Improved devx of running many pallets simultaneously Changes to /cmd: - Replace (flip) `--continue-on-fail` with `--fail-fast`, but only for `bench`. This makes all pallets/runtimes run non-stop by default, as it was primary use-case during tests - The list of successful/failed pallets was hard to find within tons of logs, so decided to write only needed logs in a file, and output as a summary in the workflow and in the comment - Side fix: updated `tasks_example` to `pallet_example_tasks` to make compliant with standard naming <img width="1006" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/14896041-7018-4a0d-92b7-4508e81913c2"> + added command results to workflow summary: <img width="1275" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b4a8afdb-dc9f-4ff9-9720-28a88956035f"> --------- Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com>
-
- Oct 07, 2024
-
-
Juan Ignacio Rios authored
# Description ## What? Make it possible for other pallets to implement their own logic when a slash on a balance occurs. ## Why? In the [introduction of holds](https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/12951) @gavofyork said: > Since Holds are designed to be infallibly slashed, this means that any logic using a Freeze must handle the possibility of the frozen amount being reduced, potentially to zero. A permissionless function should be provided in order to allow bookkeeping to be updated in this instance. At Polimec we needed to find a way to reduce the vesting schedules of our users after a slash was made, and after talking to @Kianenigma at the Web3Summit, we realized there was no easy way to implement this with the current traits, so we came up with this solution. ## How? - First we abstract the `done_slash` function of holds::Balanced to it's own trait that any pallet can implement. - Then we add a config type in pallet-balances that accepts a callback tuple of all the pallets that implement this trait. - Finally implement done_slash for pallet-balances such that it calls the config type. ## Integration The default implementation of done_slash is still an empty function, and the new config type of pallet-balances can be set to an empty tuple, so nothing changes by default. ## Review Notes - I suggest to focus on the first commit which contains the main logic changes. - I also have a working implementation of done_slash for pallet_vesting, should I add it to this PR? - If I run `cargo +nightly fmt --all` then I get changes to a lot of unrelated crates, so not sure if I should run it to avoid the fmt failure of the CI - Should I hunt down references to fungible/fungibles documentation and update it accordingly? **Polkadot address:** `15fj1UhQp8Xes7y7LSmDYTy349mXvUwrbNmLaP5tQKBxsQY1` # Checklist * [x] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the "Description" and its two subsections above. * [x] My PR follows the [labeling requirements]( https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/docs/contributor/CONTRIBUTING.md#Process ) of this project (at minimum one label for `T` required) * External contributors: ask maintainers to put the right label on your PR. * [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if applicable) --------- Co-authored-by:
Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
-
- Sep 23, 2024
-
-
Cyrill Leutwiler authored
This PR adds the EVM chain ID to Config as well as a corresponding runtime API so contracts can query it. Related issue: https://github.com/paritytech/revive/issues/44 --------- Signed-off-by:
xermicus <cyrill@parity.io> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Sep 18, 2024
-
-
Alexander Theißen authored
This will make sure that when uploading new code that the declared static memory fits within a defined limit. We apply different limits to code and data. Reason is that code will consume much more memory per byte once decoded during lazy execution. This PR: 1) Remove the MaxCodeLen from the `Config` to we maintain tight control over it. 2) Defines a single `STATIC_MEMORY_BYTES` knob that limits the maximum decoded size. 3) Enforces them only on upload but not on execution so we can raise them later. 4) Adapt the worst case calculation in `integrity_check`. 5) Bumps the max stack depth from 5 to 10 as this will still fit within our memory envelope. 6) The memory limit per contract is now a cool 1MB that can be spent on data or code. 7) Bump PolkaVM for good measure 8) The blob is limited to 256kb which is just a sanity check to not even try parsing very big inputs. --------- Co-authored-by:
Cyrill Leutwiler <cyrill@parity.io>
-
- Sep 10, 2024
-
-
Vedhavyas Singareddi authored
Update `RuntimeVerison` type and use `system_version` to derive extrinsics root `StateVersion` instead of `V0` (#4257) This PR - Renames `RuntimeVersion::state_version` to `system_version` - Uses `Runtime::system_version` to derive extrinsics root `StateVersion` instead of default `StateVersion::V0` This PR should not be breaking any existing chains so long as they use same `RuntimeVersion::state_version` for `Runtime::system_version` Using `RuntimeVersion::system_version = 2` will make the extrinsics root to use `StateVersion::V1` instead of `V0` RFC for this change - https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/RFCs/pull/42 --------- Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by:
Koute <koute@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
Nazar Mokrynskyi <nazar@mokrynskyi.com>
-
- Sep 08, 2024
-
-
PG Herveou authored
fix #5574 - Use U256 instead of BalanceOf<T> and MomentOf<T> in Ext trait - Enforce H256 for T::Hash The Ext trait still depends on the associated type `T: Config`, we can look into refactoring it even more later but even in the current state it should not influence how the data is encoded / decoded between the contract and the host ``` fn caller(&self) -> Origin<Self::T>; -> only use to extract the address of the caller fn account_id(&self) -> &AccountIdOf<Self::T>; -> only used to expose the address or access the account_id internally fn gas_meter(&self) -> &GasMeter<Self::T>; fn gas_meter_mut(&mut self) -> &mut GasMeter<Self::T>; -> encoding does not depend on T fn call_runtime(&self, call: <Self::T as Config>::RuntimeCall) -> DispatchResultWithPostInfo; -> Substrate specific, just an opaque blob of bytes from the contract's perspective fn contract_info(&mut self) -> &mut ContractInfo<Self::T>; fn transient_storage(&mut self) -> &mut TransientStorage<Self::T>; -> gated by #[cfg(any(test, feature = "runtime-benchmarks"))] ``` --------- Co-authored-by:
Alexander Theißen <alex.theissen@me.com>
-
- Sep 05, 2024
-
-
Eugen Snitko authored
Jobs for coverage collections and upload to codecov for github PR's Uses same test suit as test-linux-stable, splits tests into 5 parallel jobs, uploads to codecov, generates report comment and status checks (can be made required) | | | | --- | --- | | <img width="640" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3790f255-27d1-46b9-8d25-2e40b3dcd844"> | <img width="764" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9e0c8cc7-3278-4b4e-9e28-d76cd57b9163"> | Codecov behavior (required coverage, thresholds, comment info etc.) is highly customizable via `.github/codecov.yaml` ([reference](https://docs.codecov.com/docs/codecovyml-reference)) Unfortunately, some tests are excluded because with `-C instrument-coverage` they run very slowly, flaky, or fail (see [nextest filter expression](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5148/files#diff-b19504a9520a2498d03020108344d8e6d93d254d812bfa26247faaa7f55263d6R80) of test-linux-stable-coverage). S...
-
- Sep 04, 2024
-
-
Muharem Ismailov authored
Introduce a dynamic proposal deposit mechanism influenced by the total number of active proposals, with the option to set the deposit to none. The potential cost (e.g., balance hold) for proposal submission and storage is determined by the implementation of the `Consideration` trait. The footprint is defined as `proposal_count`, representing the total number of active proposals in the system, excluding the one currently being proposed. This cost may vary based on the proposal count. The pallet also offers various types to define a cost strategy based on the number of proposals. Two new calls are introduced: - kill(origin, proposal_hash): the cancellation of a proposal, accompanied by the burning of the associated cost/consideration ticket. - release_proposal_cost(origin, proposal_hash): the release of the cost for a non-active proposal. Additionally change: - benchmarks have been upgraded to benchmarks::v2 for collective pallet; - `ensure_successful` function added to the `Consideration` under `runtime-benchmarks` feature. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com>
-
- Sep 03, 2024
-
-
Alexander Theißen authored
Before we only supported CREATE2 semantics for contract address derivations. In order to be compatible we also want to allow CREATE1 semantics. We accomplish this to make the salt an `Option` in all places where it is used. Supplying `None` will use CREATE1 semantics by just using the deployers account nonce. ## Todo - [x] Add new tests specific for CREATE1
-
- Sep 02, 2024
-
-
PG Herveou authored
Co-authored-by:
Alexander Theißen <alex.theissen@me.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Aug 23, 2024
-
-
Alexander Theißen authored
This is a heavily modified and stripped down version of `pallet_contracts`. We decided to fork instead of extend the old pallet. Reasons for that are: - There is no benefit of supporting both on the same pallet as the intended payload for the new pallet (recompiled YUL) will be using a different ABI. - It is much easier since it allows us to remove all the code that was necessary to support Wasm and focus fully on running cross compiled YUL contracts. **The code is reviewable but can't be merged because it depends on an unreleased version of PolkaVM via git.** ## Current state All tests are passing and the code is not quick and dirty but written to last. The work is not finished, though. It is included in the `kitchensink-runtime` and a node can be built. However, we merge early in order to be able to start testing other components as early as possible. Outstanding changes are tracked here and will be merged separately: https://github.com/paritytech/polk...
-
- Aug 14, 2024
-
-
Ankan authored
## Context Pool members using the old `TransferStake` strategy were able to transfer all their funds to the pool. With `DelegateStake` changes, we want to ensure similar behaviour by allowing members to delegate all their stake to the pool. ## Changes - Ensure all the balance including ED of an account can be delegated (and used in the pool) by adding a provider for delegators. - Gates calls that mutates the pool or pool member if they are in unmigrated state. Closes https://github.com/paritytech-secops/srlabs_findings/issues/409. - Adds remote test to migrate all pools and members to `DelegateStake` which can be used with `Kusama` and `Polkadot` runtime state. closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4629. - Add new runtime apis to read pool and member balance. ## Addressing possible migration errors Pool members migrating can run into two types of errors: - Already Staking: If the pool member is already staking, we cannot migrate them to `DelegateStake` since this may mean they are able to use the same staked funds in the pool. Users would need to withdraw all their funds from staking, in order to migrate their pool funds. - Pool contribution below ED: For these cases transfer from pool account to member account would fail. The affected users can top up their accounts and redo migration. Another error that was earlier possible was when member's free balance is below ED. This PR adds a provider to delegator allowing all user balance including ED can be contributed towards the pool. This helps `1095` accounts in Polkadot and `41` accounts in Kusama to migrate now which would have earlier failed. ## Results from RemoteExternalities Tests. ### Kusama `Migration stats: success: 3017, direct_stakers: 361, unexpected_errors: 0` ### Polkadot `Migration stats: success: 42859, direct_stakers: 643, unexpected_errors: 0` ## TODO - [x] Add runtime api for member total balance. - [x] New [issue](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/5009) to reap pool members with contribution below ED. - [x] Add provider for delegators so whole balance including ED can be held while contributing to pools. - [x] Gate all pool extrinsics if pool/member is in non-migrated state. --------- Co-authored-by:
Gonçalo Pestana <g6pestana@gmail.com>
-
Serban Iorga authored
Related to #4523 This PR adds benchmarks for `report_fork_voting()`. **Important: Even though the benchmarks are now available, we still use `Weight::MAX`. That's because I realized while working on this PR that there's still one missing piece. We should also check that the ancestry proof is optimal. I plan to do this in a future PR, hopefully the last one related to #4523.** --------- Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-