- Jan 05, 2025
-
-
thiolliere authored
Implement cumulus StorageWeightReclaim as wrapping transaction extension + frame system ReclaimWeight (#6140) (rebasing of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5234) ## Issues: * Transaction extensions have weights and refund weight. So the reclaiming of unused weight must happen last in the transaction extension pipeline. Currently it is inside `CheckWeight`. * cumulus storage weight reclaim transaction extension misses the proof size of logic happening prior to itself. ## Done: * a new storage `ExtrinsicWeightReclaimed` in frame-system. Any logic which attempts to do some reclaim must use this storage to avoid double reclaim. * a new function `reclaim_weight` in frame-system pallet: info and post info in arguments, read the already reclaimed weight, calculate the new unused weight from info and post info. do the more accurate reclaim if higher. * `CheckWeight` is unchanged and still reclaim the weight in post dispatch * `ReclaimWeight` is a new transaction extension in frame system. For solo chains it must be used last in the transactino extension pipeline. It does the final most accurate reclaim * `StorageWeightReclaim` is moved from cumulus primitives into its own pallet (in order to define benchmark) and is changed into a wrapping transaction extension. It does the recording of proof size and does the reclaim using this recording and the info and post info. So parachains don't need to use `ReclaimWeight`. But also if they use it, there is no bug. ```rust /// The TransactionExtension to the basic transaction logic. pub type TxExtension = cumulus_pallet_weight_reclaim::StorageWeightReclaim< Runtime, ( frame_system::CheckNonZeroSender<Runtime>, frame_system::CheckSpecVersion<Runtime>, frame_system::CheckTxVersion<Runtime>, frame_system::CheckGenesis<Runtime>, frame_system::CheckEra<Runtime>, frame_system::CheckNonce<Runtime>, frame_system::CheckWeight<Runtime>, pallet_transaction_payment::ChargeTransactionPayment<Runtime>, BridgeRejectObsoleteHeadersAndMessages, (bridge_to_rococo_config::OnBridgeHubWestendRefundBridgeHubRococoMessages,), frame_metadata_hash_extension::CheckMetadataHash<Runtime>, ), >; ``` --------- Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by:
georgepisaltu <52418509+georgepisaltu@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Sebastian Kunert <skunert49@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Jan 03, 2025
-
-
Utkarsh Bhardwaj authored
# Description Migrate pallet-mixnet to use umbrella crate whilst adding a few types and traits in the frame prelude that are used by other pallets as well. ## Review Notes * This PR migrates `pallet-mixnet` to use the umbrella crate. * Note that some imports like `use sp_application_crypto::RuntimeAppPublic;` and imports from `sp_mixnet::types::` have not been migrated to the umbrella crate as they are not used in any / many other places and are relevant only to the `pallet-mixnet`. * Transaction related helpers to submit transactions from `frame-system` have been added to the main `prelude` as they have usage across various pallets. ```Rust pub use frame_system::offchain::*; ``` * Exporting `arithmetic` module in the main `prelude` since this is used a lot throughout various pallets. * Nightly formatting has been applied using `cargo fmt` * Benchmarking dependencies have been removed from`palet-mixnet` as there is no benchmarking.rs present for `pallet-mixnet`. For the same reason, `"pallet-mixnet?/runtime-benchmarks"` has been removed from `umbrella/Cargo.toml`. --------- Co-authored-by:
Dónal Murray <donalm@seadanda.dev>
-
- Dec 20, 2024
-
-
Xavier Lau authored
It doesn't make sense to only reorder the features array. For example: This makes it hard for me to compare the dependencies and features, especially some crates have a really really long dependencies list. ```toml [dependencies] c = "*" a = "*" b = "*" [features] std = [ "a", "b", "c", ] ``` This makes my life easier. ```toml [dependencies] a = "*" b = "*" c = "*" [features] std = [ "a", "b", "c", ] ``` --------- Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Dec 12, 2024
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
Iulian Barbu authored
# Description Get runtime's metadata, parse it and verify pallets list for a pallet named `ParachainSystem` (for now), and block number to be the same for both node and runtime. Ideally we'll add other pallets checks too, at least a small set of pallets we think right away as mandatory for parachain compatibility. Closes: #5565 ## Integration Runtime devs must be made aware that to be fully compatible with Omni Node, certain naming conventions should be respected when defining pallets (e.g we verify parachain-system pallet existence by searching for a pallet with `name` `ParachainSystem` in runtime's metadata). Not finding such a pallet will not influence the functionality yet, but by doing these checks we could provide useful feedback for runtimes that are clearly not implementing what's required for full parachain compatibility with Omni Node. ## Review Notes - [x] parachain system check - [x] check frame_system's metadata to ensure the block number in there is the same as the one in the node side - [x] add tests for the previous checking logic - [x] update omni node polkadot-sdk docs to make these conventions visible. - [ ] add more pallets checks? --------- Signed-off-by:
Iulian Barbu <iulian.barbu@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Alexandru Vasile <60601340+lexnv@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
Michal Kucharczyk <1728078+michalkucharczyk@users.noreply.github.com>
-
- Dec 04, 2024
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
No need to have them in the umbrella crate also by having them in the umbrella crate they are bleeding into the normal build. --------- Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by:
Alexander Theißen <alex.theissen@me.com>
-
- Dec 03, 2024
-
-
Lulu authored
-
- Oct 31, 2024
-
-
Alexander Theißen authored
Since https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/6266 we no longer require a custom toolchain to build the `pallet-revive-fixtures`. Hence we no longer have to guard the build behind a feature flag. --------- Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com>
-
- Oct 28, 2024
-
-
PG Herveou authored
Redo of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5953 --------- Co-authored-by:
Alexander Theißen <alex.theissen@me.com> Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com>
-
- Oct 22, 2024
-
-
PG Herveou authored
This PR introduces the necessary changes to pallet-revive for integrating with our Ethereum JSON-RPC. The RPC proxy itself will be added in a follow up. ## Changes - A new pallet::call `Call::eth_transact`. This is used as a wrapper to accept unsigned Ethereum transaction, valid call will be routed to `Call::call` or `Call::instantiate_with_code` - A custom UncheckedExtrinsic struct, that wraps the generic one usually and add the ability to check eth_transact calls sent from an Ethereum JSON-RPC proxy. - Generated types and traits to support implementing a JSON-RPC Ethereum proxy. ## Flow Overview: - A user submits a transaction via MetaMask or another Ethereum-compatible wallet. - The proxy dry run the transaction and add metadata to the call (gas limit in Weight, storage deposit limit, and length of bytecode and constructor input for contract instantiation) - The raw transaction, along with the additional metadata, is submitted to the node as an unsigned e...
-
- Oct 18, 2024
-
-
georgepisaltu authored
Original PR https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2280 reverted in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3665 This PR reintroduces the reverted functionality with additional changes, related effort [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3623). Description is copied over from the original PR First part of [Extrinsic Horizon](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2415) Introduces a new trait `TransactionExtension` to replace `SignedExtension`. Introduce the idea of transactions which obey the runtime's extensions and have according Extension data (né Extra data) yet do not have hard-coded signatures. Deprecate the terminology of "Unsigned" when used for transactions/extrinsics owing to there now being "proper" unsigned transactions which obey the extension framework and "old-style" unsigned which do not. Instead we have __*General*__ for the former and __*Bare*__ for the latter. (Ultimately, the latter will be phased out as a type of transaction, and Bare will only be used for Inherents.) Types of extrinsic are now therefore: - Bare (no hardcoded signature, no Extra data; used to be known as "Unsigned") - Bare transactions (deprecated): Gossiped, validated with `ValidateUnsigned` (deprecated) and the `_bare_compat` bits of `TransactionExtension` (deprecated). - Inherents: Not gossiped, validated with `ProvideInherent`. - Extended (Extra data): Gossiped, validated via `TransactionExtension`. - Signed transactions (with a hardcoded signature) in extrinsic v4. - General transactions (without a hardcoded signature) in extrinsic v5. `TransactionExtension` differs from `SignedExtension` because: - A signature on the underlying transaction may validly not be present. - It may alter the origin during validation. - `pre_dispatch` is renamed to `prepare` and need not contain the checks present in `validate`. - `validate` and `prepare` is passed an `Origin` rather than a `AccountId`. - `validate` may pass arbitrary information into `prepare` via a new user-specifiable type `Val`. - `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to `Implicit`/`implicit`. It is encoded *for the entire transaction* and passed in to each extension as a new argument to `validate`. This facilitates the ability of extensions to acts as underlying crypto. There is a new `DispatchTransaction` trait which contains only default function impls and is impl'ed for any `TransactionExtension` impler. It provides several utility functions which reduce some of the tedium from using `TransactionExtension` (indeed, none of its regular functions should now need to be called directly). Three transaction version discriminator ("versions") are now permissible (RFC [here](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/RFCs/pull/84)) in extrinsic version 5: - 0b00000100 or 0b00000101: Bare (used to be called "Unsigned"): contains Signature or Extra (extension data). After bare transactions are no longer supported, this will strictly identify an Inherents only. Available in both extrinsic versions 4 and 5. - 0b10000100: Old-school "Signed" Transaction: contains Signature, Extra (extension data) and an extension version byte, introduced as part of [RFC99](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/RFCs/blob/main/text/0099-transaction-extension-version.md). Still available as part of extrinsic v4. - 0b01000101: New-school "General" Transaction: contains Extra (extension data) and an extension version byte, as per RFC99, but no Signature. Only available in extrinsic v5. For the New-school General Transaction, it becomes trivial for authors to publish extensions to the mechanism for authorizing an Origin, e.g. through new kinds of key-signing schemes, ZK proofs, pallet state, mutations over pre-authenticated origins or any combination of the above. `UncheckedExtrinsic` still maintains encode/decode backwards compatibility with extrinsic version 4, where the first byte was encoded as: - 0b00000100 - Unsigned transactions - 0b10000100 - Old-school Signed transactions, without the extension version byte Now, `UncheckedExtrinsic` contains a `Preamble` and the actual call. The `Preamble` describes the type of extrinsic as follows: ```rust /// A "header" for extrinsics leading up to the call itself. Determines the type of extrinsic and /// holds any necessary specialized data. #[derive(Eq, PartialEq, Clone)] pub enum Preamble<Address, Signature, Extension> { /// An extrinsic without a signature or any extension. This means it's either an inherent or /// an old-school "Unsigned" (we don't use that terminology any more since it's confusable with /// the general transaction which is without a signature but does have an extension). /// /// NOTE: In the future, once we remove `ValidateUnsigned`, this will only serve Inherent /// extrinsics and thus can be renamed to `Inherent`. Bare(ExtrinsicVersion), /// An old-school transaction extrinsic which includes a signature of some hard-coded crypto. /// Available only on extrinsic version 4. Signed(Address, Signature, ExtensionVersion, Extension), /// A new-school transaction extrinsic which does not include a signature by default. The /// origin authorization, through signatures or other means, is performed by the transaction /// extension in this extrinsic. Available starting with extrinsic version 5. General(ExtensionVersion, Extension), } ``` ## Code Migration ### NOW: Getting it to build Wrap your `SignedExtension`s in `AsTransactionExtension`. This should be accompanied by renaming your aggregate type in line with the new terminology. E.g. Before: ```rust /// The SignedExtension to the basic transaction logic. pub type SignedExtra = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension, ); /// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime. pub type UncheckedExtrinsic = generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, SignedExtra>; ``` After: ```rust /// The extension to the basic transaction logic. pub type TxExtension = ( /* snip */ AsTransactionExtension<MySpecialSignedExtension>, ); /// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime. pub type UncheckedExtrinsic = generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, TxExtension>; ``` You'll also need to alter any transaction building logic to add a `.into()` to make the conversion happen. E.g. Before: ```rust fn construct_extrinsic( /* snip */ ) -> UncheckedExtrinsic { let extra: SignedExtra = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */), ); let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), extra.clone()).unwrap(); let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e)); UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed( /* snip */ Signature::Sr25519(signature), extra, ) } ``` After: ```rust fn construct_extrinsic( /* snip */ ) -> UncheckedExtrinsic { let tx_ext: TxExtension = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */).into(), ); let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), tx_ext.clone()).unwrap(); let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e)); UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed( /* snip */ Signature::Sr25519(signature), tx_ext, ) } ``` ### SOON: Migrating to `TransactionExtension` Most `SignedExtension`s can be trivially converted to become a `TransactionExtension`. There are a few things to know. - Instead of a single trait like `SignedExtension`, you should now implement two traits individually: `TransactionExtensionBase` and `TransactionExtension`. - Weights are now a thing and must be provided via the new function `fn weight`. #### `TransactionExtensionBase` This trait takes care of anything which is not dependent on types specific to your runtime, most notably `Call`. - `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to `Implicit`/`implicit`. - Weight must be returned by implementing the `weight` function. If your extension is associated with a pallet, you'll probably want to do this via the pallet's existing benchmarking infrastructure. #### `TransactionExtension` Generally: - `pre_dispatch` is now `prepare` and you *should not reexecute the `validate` functionality in there*! - You don't get an account ID any more; you get an origin instead. If you need to presume an account ID, then you can use the trait function `AsSystemOriginSigner::as_system_origin_signer`. - You get an additional ticket, similar to `Pre`, called `Val`. This defines data which is passed from `validate` into `prepare`. This is important since you should not be duplicating logic from `validate` to `prepare`, you need a way of passing your working from the former into the latter. This is it. - This trait takes a `Call` type parameter. `Call` is the runtime call type which used to be an associated type; you can just move it to become a type parameter for your trait impl. - There's no `AccountId` associated type any more. Just remove it. Regarding `validate`: - You get three new parameters in `validate`; all can be ignored when migrating from `SignedExtension`. - `validate` returns a tuple on success; the second item in the tuple is the new ticket type `Self::Val` which gets passed in to `prepare`. If you use any information extracted during `validate` (off-chain and on-chain, non-mutating) in `prepare` (on-chain, mutating) then you can pass it through with this. For the tuple's last item, just return the `origin` argument. Regarding `prepare`: - This is renamed from `pre_dispatch`, but there is one change: - FUNCTIONALITY TO VALIDATE THE TRANSACTION NEED NOT BE DUPLICATED FROM `validate`!! - (This is different to `SignedExtension` which was required to run the same checks in `pre_dispatch` as in `validate`.) Regarding `post_dispatch`: - Since there are no unsigned transactions handled by `TransactionExtension`, `Pre` is always defined, so the first parameter is `Self::Pre` rather than `Option<Self::Pre>`. If you make use of `SignedExtension::validate_unsigned` or `SignedExtension::pre_dispatch_unsigned`, then: - Just use the regular versions of these functions instead. - Have your logic execute in the case that the `origin` is `None`. - Ensure your transaction creation logic creates a General Transaction rather than a Bare Transaction; this means having to include all `TransactionExtension`s' data. - `ValidateUnsigned` can still be used (for now) if you need to be able to construct transactions which contain none of the extension data, however these will be phased out in stage 2 of the Transactions Horizon, so you should consider moving to an extension-centric design. --------- Signed-off-by:
georgepisaltu <george.pisaltu@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Guillaume Thiolliere <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
-
- Oct 08, 2024
-
-
Serban Iorga authored
- moved the omni-node lib from `cumulus/polkadot-parachain/polkadot-parachain-lib` to `cumulus/polkadot-omni-node/lib` - renamed `polkadot-parachain-lib` to `polkadot-omni-node-lib` - added `polkadot-omni-node` binary Related to https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/5566
-
- Oct 04, 2024
-
-
Alexandru Gheorghe authored
Jaeger tracing went mostly unused and it created bigger problems like wasting CPU or memory leaks, so remove it entirely. Fixes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4995 --------- Signed-off-by:
Alexandru Gheorghe <alexandru.gheorghe@parity.io>
-
- Sep 26, 2024
-
-
Alexandru Gheorghe authored
This is the implementation of the approach described here: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1617#issuecomment-2150321612 & https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1617#issuecomment-2154357547 & https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1617#issuecomment-2154721395. ## Description of changes The end goal is to have an architecture where we have single subsystem(`approval-voting-parallel`) and multiple worker types that would full-fill the work that currently is fulfilled by the `approval-distribution` and `approval-voting` subsystems. The main loop of the new subsystem would do just the distribution of work to the workers. The new subsystem will have: - N approval-distribution workers: This would do the work that is currently being done by the approval-distribution subsystem and in addition to that will also perform the crypto-checks that an assignment is valid and that a vote is correctly signed. Work is assigned via ...
-
- Sep 12, 2024
-
-
PG Herveou authored
fix https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/5683
-
- Aug 28, 2024
-
-
PG Herveou authored
Co-authored-by:
kianenigma <kian@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com>
-
- Aug 23, 2024
-
-
Alexander Theißen authored
This is a heavily modified and stripped down version of `pallet_contracts`. We decided to fork instead of extend the old pallet. Reasons for that are: - There is no benefit of supporting both on the same pallet as the intended payload for the new pallet (recompiled YUL) will be using a different ABI. - It is much easier since it allows us to remove all the code that was necessary to support Wasm and focus fully on running cross compiled YUL contracts. **The code is reviewable but can't be merged because it depends on an unreleased version of PolkaVM via git.** ## Current state All tests are passing and the code is not quick and dirty but written to last. The work is not finished, though. It is included in the `kitchensink-runtime` and a node can be built. However, we merge early in order to be able to start testing other components as early as possible. Outstanding changes are tracked here and will be merged separately: https://github.com/paritytech/polk...
-
- Aug 21, 2024
-
-
Serban Iorga authored
Related to https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/5210
-
- Aug 07, 2024
-
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
Uses custom metadata to exclude chain-specific crates. The only concern is that devs who want to use chain-specific crates, still need to select matching versions numbers. Could possibly be addresses with chain-specific umbrella crates, but currently it should be possible to use [psvm](https://github.com/paritytech/psvm). --------- Signed-off-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
-
- Jul 26, 2024
-
-
PG Herveou authored
This should make it possible to use the umbrella crate alone for templates/*/runtime crate of the repo
-
- Jul 19, 2024
-
-
ordian authored
Short-term addresses https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4737. - [x] Resolve benchmarking I've digged into benchmarking mentioned https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4737#issuecomment-2155084660, but it seemed to me that this code is different proof/path. @acatangiu could you confirm? (btw, in this [bench](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/b65313e8 /bridges/modules/parachains/src/benchmarking.rs#L57), where do you actually set the `fn parachains()` to a reasonable number? i've only seen 1) - [ ] Communicate to Snowfork team: This seems to be the relevant code: https://github.com/Snowfork/snowbridge/blob/1e18e010331777042aa7e8fff3c118094af856ba/relayer/cmd/parachain_head_proof.go#L95-L120 - [x] Is it preferred to iter() in some random order as suggested in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4737#issuecomment-2155084660 or take lowest para ids instead as implemented here currently? - [x] PRDoc ## Updating Polkadot and Kusama runtimes: New weights need to be generated (`pallet_mmr`) and configs updated similar to Rococo/Westend: ```patch diff --git a/polkadot/runtime/rococo/src/lib.rs b/polkadot/runtime/rococo/src/lib.rs index 5adffbd7422..c7da339b981 100644 --- a/polkadot/runtime/rococo/src/lib.rs +++ b/polkadot/runtime/rococo/src/lib.rs @@ -1307,9 +1307,11 @@ impl pallet_mmr::Config for Runtime { const INDEXING_PREFIX: &'static [u8] = mmr::INDEXING_PREFIX; type Hashing = Keccak256; type OnNewRoot = pallet_beefy_mmr::DepositBeefyDigest<Runtime>; - type WeightInfo = (); type LeafData = pallet_beefy_mmr::Pallet<Runtime>; type BlockHashProvider = pallet_mmr::DefaultBlockHashProvider<Runtime>; + type WeightInfo = weights::pallet_mmr::WeightInfo<Runtime>; + #[cfg(feature = "runtime-benchmarks")] + type BenchmarkHelper = parachains_paras::benchmarking::mmr_setup::MmrSetup<Runtime>; } parameter_types! { @@ -1319,13 +1321,8 @@ parameter_types! { pub struct ParaHeadsRootProvider; impl BeefyDataProvider<H256> for ParaHeadsRootProvider { fn extra_data() -> H256 { - let mut para_heads: Vec<(u32, Vec<u8>)> = parachains_paras::Parachains::<Runtime>::get() - .into_iter() - .filter_map(|id| { - parachains_paras::Heads::<Runtime>::get(&id).map(|head| (id.into(), head.0)) - }) - .collect(); - para_heads.sort(); + let para_heads: Vec<(u32, Vec<u8>)> = + parachains_paras::Pallet::<Runtime>::sorted_para_heads(); binary_merkle_tree::merkle_root::<mmr::Hashing, _>( para_heads.into_iter().map(|pair| pair.encode()), ) @@ -1746,6 +1743,7 @@ mod benches { [pallet_identity, Identity] [pallet_indices, Indices] [pallet_message_queue, MessageQueue] + [pallet_mmr, Mmr] [pallet_multisig, Multisig] [pallet_parameters, Parameters] [pallet_preimage, Preimage] ``` --------- Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
-
- Jun 26, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4298 This PR also merges `xcm-fee-payment-runtime-api` module to the `xcm-runtime-api`. ## TODO - [x] rename `convert` to `convert_location` and add new one `convert_account` (opposite direction) - [x] add to the all testnet runtimes - [x] check polkadot-js if supports that automatically or if needs to be added manually https://github.com/polkadot-js/api/pull/5917 - [ ] backport/patch for fellows and release (asap) ## Open questions - [x] should we merge `xcm-runtime-api` and `xcm-fee-payment-runtime-api` to the one module `xcm-runtime-api` ? ## Usage Input: - `location: VersionedLocation` Output: - account_id bytes  --------- Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
-
- Jun 21, 2024
-
-
Pablo Andrés Dorado Suárez authored
Closes #3342 cc/ @liamaharon TODO: - [x] Improve docs. - [x] Define public interface (See #3342). In case we define public calls to the pallet implementation: - Implement public calls. - Benchmarks. polkadot address: 12gMhxHw8QjEwLQvnqsmMVY1z5gFa54vND74aMUbhhwN6mJR --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
-
- Jun 03, 2024
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
-
- May 24, 2024
-
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
# Umbrella Crate The Polkadot-SDK "umbrella" is a crate that re-exports all other published crates. This makes it possible to have a very small `Cargo.toml` file that only has one dependency, the umbrella crate. This helps with selecting the right combination of crate versions, since otherwise 3rd party tools are needed to select a compatible set of versions. ## Features The umbrella crate supports no-std builds and can therefore be used in the runtime and node. There are two main features: `runtime` and `node`. The `runtime` feature enables all `no-std` crates, while the `node` feature enables all `std` crates. It should be used like any other crate in the repo, with `default-features = false`. For more fine-grained control, additionally, each crate can be enabled selectively. The umbrella exposes one feature per dependency. For example, if you only want to use the `frame-support` crate, you can enable the `frame-support` feature. The umbrella exposes a few more g...
-