Skip to content
  1. Mar 26, 2024
    • Dcompoze's avatar
      Fix spelling mistakes across the whole repository (#3808) · 002d9260
      Dcompoze authored 
      **Update:** Pushed additional changes based on the review comments.

**This pull request fixes various spelling mistakes in this
repository.**

Most of the changes are contained in the first **3** commits:

- `Fix spelling mistakes in comments and docs`

- `Fix spelling mistakes in test names`

- `Fix spelling mistakes in error messages, panic messages, logs and
tracing`

Other source code spelling mistakes are separated into individual
commits for easier reviewing:

- `Fix the spelling of 'authority'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'REASONABLE_HEADERS_IN_JUSTIFICATION_ANCESTRY'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'prev_enqueud_messages'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'endpoint'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'children'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSiblingSovereignAccount'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PenpalSudoAccount'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'insufficient'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PalletXcmExtrinsicsBenchmark'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'subtracted'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'CandidatePendingAvailability'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'exclusive'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'until'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'discriminator'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'nonexistent'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'subsystem'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'indices'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'committed'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'topology'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'response'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'beneficiary'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'formatted'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'UNKNOWN_PROOF_REQUEST'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'succeeded'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'reopened'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'proposer'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'InstantiationNonce'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'depositor'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'expiration'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'phantom'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'AggregatedKeyValue'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'randomness'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'defendant'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'AquaticMammal'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'transactions'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'PassingTracingSubscriber'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'TxSignaturePayload'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'versioning'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'descendant'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'overridden'`

- `Fix the spelling of 'network'`

Let me know if this structure is adequate.

**Note:** The usage of the words `Merkle`, `Merkelize`, `Merklization`,
`Merkelization`, `Merkleization`, is somewhat inconsistent but I left it
as it is.

~~**Note:** In some places the term `Receival` is used to refer to
message reception, IMO `Reception` is the correct word here, but I left
it as it is.~~

~~**Note:** In some places the term `Overlayed` is used instead of the
more acceptable version `Overlaid` but I also left it as it is.~~

~~**Note:** In some places the term `Applyable` is used instead of the
correct version `Applicable` but I also left it as it is.~~

**Note:** Some usage of British vs American english e.g. `judgement` vs
`judgment`, `initialise` vs `initialize`, `optimise` vs `optimize` etc.
are both present in different places, but I suppose that's
understandable given the number of contributors.

~~**Note:** There is a spelling mistake in `.github/CODEOWNERS` but it
triggers errors in CI when I make changes to it, so I left it as it
is.~~
      002d9260
    • Dcompoze's avatar
      Fix formatting in Cargo.toml (#3842) · ea97863c
      Dcompoze authored 
      Fixes formatting for
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3698
      ea97863c
  3. Mar 25, 2024
  5. Mar 23, 2024
  7. Mar 22, 2024
    • girazoki's avatar
      [pallet-xcm] fix transport fees for remote reserve transfers (#3792) · 9a04ebbf
      girazoki authored 
      Currently `transfer_assets` from pallet-xcm covers 4 main different
transfer types:
- `localReserve`
- `DestinationReserve`
- `Teleport`
- `RemoteReserve`

For the first three, the local execution and the remote message sending
are separated, and fees are deducted in pallet-xcm itself:
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/3410dfb3929462da88be2da813f121d8b1cf46b3/polkadot/xcm/pallet-xcm/src/lib.rs#L1758

.

For the 4th case `RemoteReserve`, pallet-xcm is still relying on the
xcm-executor itself to send the message (through the
`initiateReserveWithdraw` instruction). In this case, if delivery fees
need to be charged, it is not possible to do so because the
`jit_withdraw` mode has not being set.

This PR proposes to still use the `initiateReserveWithdraw` but
prepending a `setFeesMode { jit_withdraw: true }` to make sure delivery
fees can be paid.

A test-case is also added to present the aforementioned case

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatarAdrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
      9a04ebbf
    • PG Herveou's avatar
      XCM remove extra QueryId types from traits (#3763) · 2f59e9ef
      PG Herveou authored 
      We do not need to make these traits generic over QueryId type, we can
just use the QueryId alias everywhere
      2f59e9ef
    • Dmitry Markin's avatar
      Make public addresses go first in authority discovery DHT records (#3757) · 9d2963c2
      Dmitry Markin authored 
      Make sure explicitly set by the operator public addresses go first in
the authority discovery DHT records.

Also update `Discovery` behavior to eliminate duplicates in the returned
addresses.

This PR should improve situation with
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3519.

Obsoletes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3657.
      9d2963c2
    • Will | Paradox | ParaNodes.io's avatar
      Adding LF's bootnodes to relay and system chains (#3514) · ea5f4e9a
      Will | Paradox | ParaNodes.io authored 
      

Good day,

I'm seeking to add the following bootnodes for Kusama and Polkadot's
relay and system chains. The following commands can be used to test
connectivity. All node keys are backed up.

Polkadot:
```
polkadot --chain polkadot --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/boot-polkadot.luckyfriday.io/tcp/443/wss/p2p/12D3KooWAdyiVAaeGdtBt6vn5zVetwA4z4qfm9Fi2QCSykN1wTBJ" --no-hardware-benchmarks
```


Assethub-Polkadot:

```
polkadot-parachain --chain asset-hub-polkadot --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/boot-polkadot-assethub.luckyfriday.io/tcp/443/wss/p2p/12D3KooWDR9M7CjV1xdjCRbRwkFn1E7sjMaL4oYxGyDWxuLrFc2J" --no-hardware-benchmarks

```

Bridgehub-Polkadot:

```
polkadot-parachain --chain bridge-hub-polkadot --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/boot-polkadot-bridgehub.luckyfriday.io/tcp/443/wss/p2p/12D3KooWKf3mBXHjLbwtPqv1BdbQuwbFNcQQYxASS7iQ25264AXH" --no-hardware-benchmarks

```
Collectives-Polkadot

```
polkadot-parachain --chain collectives-polkadot --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/boot-polkadot-collectives.luckyfriday.io/tcp/443/wss/p2p/12D3KooWCzifnPooTt4kvTnXT7FTKTymVL7xn7DURQLsS2AKpf6w" --no-hardware-benchmarks

```
Kusama:

```
polkadot --chain kusama --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/boot-kusama.luckyfriday.io/tcp/443/wss/p2p/12D3KooWS1Lu6DmK8YHSvkErpxpcXmk14vG6y4KVEFEkd9g62PP8" --no-hardware-benchmarks

```
Assethub-Kusama:

```
polkadot-parachain --chain asset-hub-kusama --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/boot-kusama-assethub.luckyfriday.io/tcp/443/wss/p2p/12D3KooWSwaeFs6FNgpgh54fdoxSDAA4nJNaPE3PAcse2GRrG7b3" --no-hardware-benchmarks
```

Bridgehub-Kusama:

```
polkadot-parachain --chain bridge-hub-kusama --base-path /tmp/node --name "Boot" --reserved-only --reserved-nodes "/dns/boot-kusama-bridgehub.luckyfriday.io/tcp/443/wss/p2p/12D3KooWQybw6AFmAvrFfwUQnNxUpS12RovapD6oorh2mAJr4xyd" --no-hardware-benchmarks
```

Co-authored-by: default avatarBastian Köcher <[email protected]>
      ea5f4e9a
  9. Mar 21, 2024
  11. Mar 20, 2024
    • eskimor's avatar
      Fix algorithmic complexity of on-demand scheduler with regards to number of cores. (#3190) · b74353d3
      eskimor authored 
      

We witnessed really poor performance on Rococo, where we ended up with
50 on-demand cores. This was due to the fact that for each core the full
queue was processed. With this change full queue processing will happen
way less often (most of the time complexity is O(1) or O(log(n))) and if
it happens then only for one core (in expectation).

Also spot price is now updated before each order to ensure economic back
pressure.


TODO:

- [x] Implement
- [x] Basic tests
- [x] Add more tests (see todos)
- [x] Run benchmark to confirm better performance, first results suggest
> 100x faster.
- [x] Write migrations
- [x] Bump scale-info version and remove patch in Cargo.toml
- [x] Write PR docs: on-demand performance improved, more on-demand
cores are now non problematic anymore. If need by also the max queue
size can be increased again. (Maybe not to 10k)

Optional: Performance can be improved even more, if we called
`pop_assignment_for_core()`, before calling `report_processed` (Avoid
needless affinity drops). The effect gets smaller the larger the claim
queue and I would only go for it, if it does not add complexity to the
scheduler.

---------

Co-authored-by: default avatareskimor <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarantonva <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: default avatarAnton Vilhelm Ásgeirsson <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: default avatarordian <[email protected]>
      b74353d3
    • Tsvetomir Dimitrov's avatar
      Expose `ClaimQueue` via a runtime api and use it in `collation-generation` (#3580) · e58e854a
      Tsvetomir Dimitrov authored 
      The PR adds two things:
1. Runtime API exposing the whole claim queue
2. Consumes the API in `collation-generation` to fetch the next
scheduled `ParaEntry` for an occupied core.

Related to https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1797
      e58e854a
  13. Mar 19, 2024
  15. Mar 18, 2024
  17. Mar 17, 2024
  19. Mar 15, 2024
  21. Mar 14, 2024
  23. Mar 13, 2024
  25. Mar 12, 2024
    • Alexandru Gheorghe's avatar
      Add api-name in `cannot query the runtime API version` warning (#3653) · 1ead5977
      Alexandru Gheorghe authored 
      

Sometimes we see nodes printing this warning:
```
cannot query the runtime API version: Api called for an unknown Block: State already discarded for
```

The log is harmless, but let's print the api we got this for, so that we
can track its call site and truly confirm it is harmless or fix it.

Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandru Gheorghe <[email protected]>
      1ead5977
    • Koute's avatar
      Add a PolkaVM-based executor (#3458) · b0f34e4b
      Koute authored 
      This PR adds a new PolkaVM-based executor to Substrate.

- The executor can now be used to actually run a PolkaVM-based runtime,
and successfully produces blocks.
- The executor is always compiled-in, but is disabled by default.
- The `SUBSTRATE_ENABLE_POLKAVM` environment variable must be set to `1`
to enable the executor, in which case the node will accept both WASM and
PolkaVM program blobs (otherwise it'll default to WASM-only). This is
deliberately undocumented and not explicitly exposed anywhere (e.g. in
the command line arguments, or in the API) to disincentivize anyone from
enabling it in production. If/when we'll move this into production usage
I'll remove the environment variable and do it "properly".
- I did not use our legacy runtime allocator for the PolkaVM executor,
so currently every allocation inside of the runtime will leak guest
memory until that particular instance is destroyed. The idea here is
that I will work on the https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/RFCs/pull/4
which will remove the need for the legacy allocator under WASM, and that
will also allow us to use a proper non-leaking allocator under PolkaVM.
- I also did some minor cleanups of the WASM executor and deleted some
dead code.

No prdocs included since this is not intended to be an end-user feature,
but an unofficial experiment, and shouldn't affect any current
production user. Once this is production-ready a full Polkadot
Fellowship RFC will be necessary anyway.
      b0f34e4b
  27. Mar 11, 2024
  29. Mar 08, 2024