Oliver Tale-Yazdi
authored
There are some accounts that do not have a consumer ref while having a
reserve.
This adds a fail-safe mechanism to trigger in the case that
`does_consume` is true, but the assumption of `consumer>0` is not.
This should prevent those accounts from loosing balance and the TI from
getting messed up even more, but is not an "ideal" fix. TBH an ideal fix
is not possible, since on-chain data is in an invalid state.
---------
Signed-off-by: 
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>| Name | Last commit | Last update |
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| tests | ||
| benchmarking.rs | ||
| impl_currency.rs | ||
| impl_fungible.rs | ||
| lib.rs | ||
| migration.rs | ||
| types.rs | ||
| weights.rs | ||