- Dec 08, 2023
-
-
Muharem Ismailov authored
Treasury Pallet Instance for the Fellowship in Westend Collectives. In this update, we present a Treasury Pallet Instance that is under the control of the Fellowship body, with oversight from the Root and Treasurer origins. Here's how it is governed: - the Root origin have the authority to reject or approve spend proposals, with no amount limit for approvals. - the Treasurer origin have the authority to reject or approve spend proposals, with approval limits of up to 10,000,000 DOT. - Voice of all Fellows ranked at 3 or above can reject or approve spend proposals, with a maximum approval limit of 10,000 DOT. - Voice of Fellows ranked at 4 or above can also reject or approve spend proposals, with a maximum approval limit of 10,000,000 DOT. Additionally, we introduce the Asset Rate Pallet Instance to establish conversion rates from asset A to B. This is used to determine if a proposed spend amount involving a non-native asset is permissible by the commanding origin. The rates can be set up by the Root, Treasurer origins, or Voice of all Fellows. --------- Co-authored-by:
joe petrowski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
joepetrowski <[email protected]>
-
- Dec 06, 2023
-
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
# Motivation (+testing) ### Enable easy `ForeignAssets` transfers using `pallet-xcm` We had just previously added capabilities to teleport fees during reserve-based transfers, but what about reserve-transferring fees when needing to teleport some non-fee asset? This PR aligns everything under either explicit reserve-transfer, explicit teleport, or this new flexible `transfer_assets()` which can mix and match as needed with fewer artificial constraints imposed to the user. This will enable, for example, a (non-system) parachain to teleport their `ForeignAssets` assets to AssetHub while using DOT to pay fees. (the assets are teleported - as foreign assets should from their owner chain - while DOT used for fees can only be reserve-based transferred between said parachain and AssetHub). Added `xcm-emulator` tests for this scenario ^. # Description Reverts `(limited_)reserve_transfer_assets` to only allow reserve-based transfers for all `assets` including fees. Similarly `(limited_)teleport_assets` only allows teleports for all `assets` including fees. For complex combinations of asset transfers where assets and fees may have different reserves or different reserve/teleport trust configurations, users can use the newly added `transfer_assets()` extrinsic which is more flexible in allowing more complex scenarios. `assets` (excluding `fees`) must have same reserve location or otherwise be teleportable to `dest`. No limitations imposed on `fees`. - for local reserve: transfer assets to sovereign account of destination chain and forward a notification XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`. - for destination reserve: burn local assets and forward a notification to `dest` chain to withdraw the reserve assets from this chain's sovereign account and deposit them to `beneficiary`. - for remote reserve: burn local assets, forward XCM to reserve chain to move reserves from this chain's SA to `dest` chain's SA, and forward another XCM to `dest` to mint and deposit reserve-based assets to `beneficiary`. - for teleports: burn local assets and forward XCM to `dest` chain to mint/teleport assets and deposit them to `beneficiary`. ## Review notes Only around 500 lines are prod code (see `pallet_xcm/src/lib.rs`), the rest of the PR is new tests and improving existing tests. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Dec 01, 2023
-
-
Liam Aharon authored
Using taplo, fixes all our broken and inconsistent toml formatting and adds CI to keep them tidy. If people want we can customise the format rules as described here https://taplo.tamasfe.dev/configuration/formatter-options.html @ggwpez , I suggest zepter is used only for checking features are propagated, and leave formatting for taplo to avoid duplicate work and conflicts. TODO - [x] Use `exclude = [...]` syntax in taplo file to ignore zombienet tests instead of deleting the dir --------- Signed-off-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 27, 2023
-
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
Just adds more tests.
-
- Nov 13, 2023
-
-
Adrian Catangiu authored
## Motivation `pallet-xcm` is the main user-facing interface for XCM functionality, including assets manipulation functions like `teleportAssets()` and `reserve_transfer_assets()` calls. While `teleportAsset()` works both ways, `reserve_transfer_assets()` works only for sending reserve-based assets to a remote destination and beneficiary when the reserve is the _local chain_. ## Solution This PR enhances `pallet_xcm::(limited_)reserve_withdraw_assets` to support transfers when reserves are other chains. This will allow complete, **bi-directional** reserve-based asset transfers user stories using `pallet-xcm`. Enables following scenarios: - transferring assets with local reserve (was previously supported iff asset used as fee also had local reserve - now it works in all cases), - transferring assets with reserve on destination, - transferring assets with reserve on remote/third-party chain (iff assets and fees have same remote reserve), - transferring assets with reserve different than the reserve of the asset to be used as fees - meaning can be used to transfer random asset with local/dest reserve while using DOT for fees on all involved chains, even if DOT local/dest reserve doesn't match asset reserve, - transferring assets with any type of local/dest reserve while using fees which can be teleported between involved chains. All of the above is done by pallet inner logic without the user having to specify which scenario/reserves/teleports/etc. The correct scenario and corresponding XCM programs are identified, and respectively, built automatically based on runtime configuration of trusted teleporters and trusted reserves. #### Current limitations: - while `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CAN have different reserves (or fees CAN be teleported), the remaining "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT, among themselves, have different reserve locations (this is also implicitly enforced by `MAX_ASSETS_FOR_TRANSFER=2`, but this can be safely increased in the future). - `fees` and "non-fee" `assets` CANNOT have **different remote** reserves (this could also be supported in the future, but adds even more complexity while possibly not being worth it - we'll see what the future holds). Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/1584 Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2055 --------- Co-authored-by:
Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <[email protected]>
-
- Nov 08, 2023
-
-
Ignacio Palacios authored
Closes: - #1383 - Declared chains can be now be imported and reused in a different crate. - Chain declaration are now generic over a generic type `N` (the Network) - #1389 - Solved #1383, chains and networks declarations can be restructure to avoid having to compile all chains when running integrations tests where are not needed. - Chains are now declared on its own crate (removed from `integration-tests-common`) - Networks are now declared on its own crate (removed from `integration-tests-common`) - Integration tests will import only the relevant Network crate - `integration-tests-common` is renamed to `emulated-integration-tests-common` All this is necessary to be able to implement what is described here: https://github.com/paritytech/roadmap/issues/56#issuecomment-1777010553 --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-