- Mar 10, 2025
-
-
jpserrat authored
Closes #6851 This PR adds an `EventEmitter` trait to the XCM Executor configuration, enabling event emission for XCM handling. The implementation introduces three dedicated functions to emit relevant events: - `emit_sent_event`: Emits a `Sent` event when an XCM is successfully sent. - `emit_send_failure_event`: Emits a `SendFailed` event when an XCM fails to send. - `emit_process_failure_event`: Emits a `ProcessXcmError` event when an XCM fails during processing. Kusama address: FkB6QEo8VnV3oifugNj5NeVG3Mvq1zFbrUu4P5YwRoe5mQN --------- Co-authored-by:
Raymond Cheung <178801527+raymondkfcheung@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
cmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
-
- Mar 06, 2025
-
-
Utkarsh Bhardwaj authored
# Description * This PR adds a new extrinsic `poke_deposit` to `pallet-proxy`. This extrinsic will be used to re-adjust the deposits made in the pallet to create a proxy or to create an announcement. * Part of #5591 ## Review Notes * Added a new extrinsic `poke_deposit` in `pallet-proxy`. * This extrinsic checks and adjusts the deposits made for either creating a proxy or creating an announcement or both. * Added a new event `DepositPoked` to be emitted upon a successful call of the extrinsic. * Although the immediate use of the extrinsic will be to give back some of the deposit after the AH-migration, the extrinsic is written such that it can work if the deposit decreases or increases (both). * The call to the extrinsic would be `free` if an actual adjustment is made to the deposit for creating a proxy or to the deposit for creating an announcement or both and `paid` otherwise (when no deposit is changed). * Added a new enum `DepositKind` to differentiate between proxy deposit adjusted and announcement deposit adjusted when emitting events. * Added tests to test all scenarios. ## TO-DOs * [ ] Run CI cmd bot to benchmark --------- Co-authored-by:
cmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
-
- Feb 27, 2025
-
-
Utkarsh Bhardwaj authored
# Description * This PR adds a new extrinsic `poke_deposit` to `pallet-multisig`. This extrinsic will be used to re-adjust the deposits made in the pallet to create a multisig operation after AHM. * Part of #5591 ## Review Notes * Added a new extrinsic `poke_deposit` in `pallet-multisig`. * Added a new event `DepositPoked` to be emitted upon a successful call of the extrinsic. * Although the immediate use of the extrinsic will be to give back some of the deposit after the AH-migration, the extrinsic is written such that it can work if the deposit decreases or increases (both). * The call to the extrinsic would be `free` if an actual adjustment is made to the deposit and `paid` otherwise. * Added tests to test all scenarios. ## TO-DOs * [x] Add Benchmark * [x] Run CI cmd bot to benchmark --------- Co-authored-by:
cmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
Giuseppe Re <giuseppe.re@parity.io>
-
- Feb 26, 2025
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
Relates to: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/7541 Relates to: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/7566 This PR contains improved test cases that rely on the governance location as preparation for AHM to capture the state as it is. It introduces `execute_as_governance_call`, which can be configured with various governance location setups instead of the hard-coded `Location::parent()`. Additionally, it adds a test for `authorize_upgrade` to all SP testnets. ## TODO - [x] rewrite all tests using `RuntimeHelper::<Runtime>::execute_as_governance` (because it is using hard-coded `Location::parent()`) to use `RuntimeHelper::<Runtime>::execute_as_governance_call` ## Follow-up - [ ] add similar test for westend-runtime - [ ] add test that ensure xcm-executor adds `ClearOrigin` before all side-effect sent to different chain --------- Co-authored-by:
cmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
-
- Feb 24, 2025
-
-
Daniel Shiposha authored
# Description Fixes #7413 ## Integration This PR updates the `DryRunApi`. The signature of the `dry_run_call` is changed, and the XCM version of the return values of `dry_run_xcm` now follows the version of the input XCM program. ## Review Notes * **The `DryRunApi` is modified** * **Added the `Router::clear_messages` to `dry_run_xcm` common implementation** * **Fixed the xcmp-queue's Router's clear_messages: channels details' first_index and last_index are reset when clearing** * **The MIN_XCM_VERSION is added** * The common implementation in the `pallet-xcm` is modified accordingly * The `DryRunApi` tests are modified to account for testing old XCM versions * The implementation from the `pallet-xcm` is used where it was not used (including the `DryRunApi` tests) * All the runtime implementations are modified according to the Runtime API change --------- Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
-
paritytech-cmd-bot-polkadot-sdk[bot] authored
Auto-update of all weights for 2025-02-21-1740149841. Subweight results: - [now vs master](https://weights.tasty.limo/compare?repo=polkadot-sdk&threshold=5&path_pattern=.%2F**%2Fweights%2F**%2F*.rs%2C.%2F**%2Fweights.rs&method=asymptotic&ignore_errors=true&unit=time&old=master&new=update-weights-weekly-2025-02-21-1740149841) - [now vs polkadot-v1.15.6 (2025-01-16)](https://weights.tasty.limo/compare?repo=polkadot-sdk&threshold=5&path_pattern=.%2F**%2Fweights%2F**%2F*.rs%2C.%2F**%2Fweights.rs&method=asymptotic&ignore_errors=true&unit=time&old=polkadot-v1.15.6&new=update-weights-weekly-2025-02-21-1740149841) - [now vs polkadot-v1.16.2 (2024-11-14)](https://weights.tasty.limo/compare?repo=polkadot-sdk&threshold=5&path_pattern=.%2F**%2Fweights%2F**%2F*.rs%2C.%2F**%2Fweights.rs&method=asymptotic&ignore_errors=true&unit=time&old=polkadot-v1.16.2&new=update-weights-weekly-2025-02-21-1740149841) Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-act...
-
- Feb 21, 2025
-
-
clangenb authored
Extracted from #7473. Part of: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/5704. --------- Co-authored-by:
cmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
-
- Feb 20, 2025
-
-
Alexander Theißen authored
Ref https://github.com/paritytech/ci_cd/issues/1107 We mainly need that so that we can finally compile the `pallet_revive` fixtures on stable. I did my best to keep the commits focused on one thing to make review easier. All the changes are needed because rustc introduced more warnings or is more strict about existing ones. Most of the stuff could just be fixed and the commits should be pretty self explanatory. However, there are a few this that are notable: ## `non_local_definitions ` A lot of runtimes to write `impl` blocks inside functions. This makes sense to reduce the amount of conditional compilation. I guess I could have moved them into a module instead. But I think allowing it here makes sense to avoid the code churn. ## `unexpected_cfgs` The FRAME macros emit code that references various features like `std`, `runtime-benchmarks` or `try-runtime`. If a create that uses those macros does not have those features we get this warning. Those were mostly when ...
-
- Feb 19, 2025
-
-
Serban Iorga authored
Related to https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/7360 Derive `DecodeWithMemTracking` for the structures in the cumulus pallets and for the structures in the `polkadot-sdk` runtimes. The PR contains no functional changes and no manual implementation. Just deriving `DecodeWithMemTracking`.
-
Branislav Kontur authored
XCM: Deny barrier checks for nested XCMs with specific instructions to be executed on the local chain (#7200) Resolves (partially): https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/7148 Depends on: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/7169 # Description This PR addresses partially #7148 (Problem 2) and ensures the proper checking of nested local instructions. It introduces a new barrier - `DenyRecursively` - to provide more refined control over instruction denial. The main change is the replacement of `DenyThenTry<Deny, Allow>` with `DenyThenTry<DenyRecursively<Deny>, Allow>` which handles both top-level and nested local instructions by applying allow condition after denial. For context and additional information, please refer to [_Problem 2 - Barrier vs nested XCM validation_](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/7148). # TODO - [x] Evaluate PoC, more details at #7351: - **DenyNestedXcmInstructions**: Keep it as it is and be explicit: 1. Name the Deny barriers for the top level. 2. Name the Deny barrier for nested with `DenyInstructionsWithXcm`. - **DenyThenTry<DenyInstructionsWithXcm<Deny>, Allow>**: Alternatively, hard-code those three instructions in `DenyThenTry`, so we wouldn’t need `DenyInstructionsWithXcm`. However, this approach wouldn’t be as general. - **DenyInstructionsWithXcmFor**: Another possibility is to check `DenyInstructionsWithXcm::Inner` for the actual `message`, so we don’t need duplication for top-level and nested (not sure, maybe be explicit is good thing) - see _Problem2 - example_. Instead of this: ``` DenyThenTry< ( // Deny for top level XCM program DenyReserveTransferToRelayChain, // Dedicated barrier for nested XCM programs DenyInstructionsWithXcmFor< // Repeat all Deny filters here DenyReserveTransferToRelayChain, > ), ``` we could just use: ``` DenyThenTry< ( // Dedicated barrier for XCM programs DenyInstructionsWithXcmFor< // Add all `Deny` filters here DenyReserveTransferToRelayChain, ... > ), ``` - [POC Evaluation](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/7200#discussion_r1939288792) - [x] Consider better name `DenyInstructionsWithXcm` => `DenyRecursively`, more details at [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/7200#discussion_r1958588973) - [x] Clean-up and docs - [x] Merge https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/7169 or rebase this branch on the top of `yrong:fix-for-deny-then-try` - [x] Set for the runtimes where we use `DenyThenTry<Deny, Allow>` => `DenyThenTry<DenyRecursively<Deny>, Allow>` - [ ] Schedule sec.audit --------- Co-authored-by:
Raymond Cheung <178801527+raymondkfcheung@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
cmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
ron <yrong1997@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Clara van Staden <claravanstaden64@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
-
- Feb 18, 2025
-
-
Xavier Lau authored
Add a new extrinsic `dispatch_as_fallible`. It's almost the same as [`Pallet::dispatch_as`] but forwards any error of the inner call. Closes #219. And add more unit tests to cover `dispatch_as` and `dispatch_as_fallible`. --- Polkadot address: 156HGo9setPcU2qhFMVWLkcmtCEGySLwNqa3DaEiYSWtte4Y --------- Signed-off-by:
Xavier Lau <x@acg.box> Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <info@kchr.de> Co-authored-by:
cmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
-
Ankan authored
closes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/6508. ## TODO - [x] Migrate storage `DisabledValidators` both in pallet-session and pallet-staking. - [ ] Test that disabled validator resets at era change. - [ ] Add always sorted try-runtime test for `DisabledValidators`. - [ ] More test coverage for the disabling logic. --------- Co-authored-by:
Gonçalo Pestana <g6pestana@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
Guillaume Thiolliere <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
kianenigma <kian@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Giuseppe Re <giuseppe.re@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
cmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
-
- Feb 17, 2025
-
-
rainb0w-pr0mise authored
# Utility Call Fallback This introduces a new extrinsic: **`if_else`** Which first attempts to dispatch the `main` call(s). If the `main` call(s) fail, the `fallback` call(s) is dispatched instead. Both calls are executed with the same origin. In the event of a fallback failure the whole call fails with the weights returned. ## Use Case Some use cases might involve submitting a `batch` type call in either main, fallback or both. Resolves #6000 Polkadot Address: 1HbdqutFR8M535LpbLFT41w3j7v9ptEYGEJKmc6PKpqthZ8 --------- Co-authored-by:
rainbow-promise <154476501+rainbow-promise@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
Guillaume Thiolliere <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
-
- Feb 14, 2025
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
Co-authored-by:
cmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
-
Oliver Tale-Yazdi authored
Changes: - Expose a `force_set_head` function from the `MessageQueue` pallet via a new trait: `ForceSetHead`. This can be used to force the MQ pallet to process this queue next. - The change only exposes an internal function through a trait, no audit is required. ## Context For the Asset Hub Migration (AHM) we need a mechanism to prioritize the inbound upward messages and the inbound downward messages on the AH. To achieve this, a minimal (and no breaking) change is done to the MQ pallet in the form of adding the `force_set_head` function. An example use of how to achieve prioritization is then demonstrated in `integration_test.rs::AhmPrioritizer`. Normally, all queues are scheduled round-robin like this: `| Relay | Para(1) | Para(2) | ... | Relay | ... ` The prioritizer listens to changes to its queue and triggers if either: - The queue processed in the last block (to keep the general round-robin scheduling) - The queue did not process since `n` blocks (to prevent starvation if there are too many other queues) In either situation, it schedules the queue for a streak of three consecutive blocks, such that it would become: `| Relay | Relay | Relay | Para(1) | Para(2) | ... | Relay | Relay | Relay | ... ` It basically transforms the round-robin into an elongated round robin. Although different strategies can be injected into the pallet at runtime, this one seems to strike a good balance between general service level and prioritization. --------- Signed-off-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
cmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
muharem <ismailov.m.h@gmail.com>
-
- Feb 07, 2025
-
-
Przemek Rzad authored
- Closes https://github.com/paritytech/license-scanner/issues/44 - Silent because only comments are changed in the crates. ## What's inside First, we change the file traversal mechanism from shell globbing to walking through files which happens inside the `license-scanner` - so it has knowledge about directory structure and can correlate files with corresponding Cargo manifest. Next, added `MIT-0` and `Unlicense` to the allowed list of licenses. `Unlicense` appears only once across {Substrate,Cumulus,Polkadot} - in `penpal-runtime`. Finally, updated headers in files that do not match the corresponding manifest license. --------- Co-authored-by:
cornholio <0@mcornholio.ru>
-
- Feb 04, 2025
-
-
Alexander Theißen authored
This PR is centered around a main fix regarding the base deposit and a bunch of drive by or related fixtures that make sense to resolve in one go. It could be broken down more but I am constantly rebasing this PR and would appreciate getting those fixes in as-one. **This adds a multi block migration to Westend AssetHub that wipes the pallet state clean. This is necessary because of the changes to the `ContractInfo` storage item. It will not delete the child storage though. This will leave a tiny bit of garbage behind but won't cause any problems. They will just be orphaned.** ## Record the deposit for immutable data into the `storage_base_deposit` The `storage_base_deposit` are all the deposit a contract has to pay for existing. It included the deposit for its own metadata and a deposit proportional (< 1.0x) to the size of its code. However, the immutable code size was not recorded there. This would lead to the situation where on terminate this portion wouldn't be refunded staying locked into the contract. It would also make the calculation of the deposit changes on `set_code_hash` more complicated when it updates the immutable data (to be done in #6985). Reason is because it didn't know how much was payed before since the storage prices could have changed in the mean time. In order for this solution to work I needed to delay the deposit calculation for a new contract for after the contract is done executing is constructor as only then we know the immutable data size. Before, we just charged this eagerly in `charge_instantiate` before we execute the constructor. Now, we merely send the ED as free balance before the constructor in order to create the account. After the constructor is done we calculate the contract base deposit and charge it. This will make `set_code_hash` much easier to implement. As a side effect it is now legal to call `set_immutable_data` multiple times per constructor (even though I see no reason to do so). It simply overrides the immutable data with the new value. The deposit accounting will be done after the constructor returns (as mentioned above) instead of when setting the immutable data. ## Don't pre-charge for reading immutable data I noticed that we were pre-charging weight for the max allowable immutable data when reading those values and then refunding after read. This is not necessary as we know its length without reading the storage as we store it out of band in contract metadata. This makes reading it free. Less pre-charging less problems. ## Remove delegate locking Fixes #7092 This is also in the spirit of making #6985 easier to implement. The locking complicates `set_code_hash` as we might need to block settings the code hash when locks exist. Check #7092 for further rationale. ## Enforce "no terminate in constructor" eagerly We used to enforce this rule after the contract execution returned. Now we error out early in the host call. This makes it easier to be sure to argue that a contract info still exists (wasn't terminated) when a constructor successfully returns. All around this his just much simpler than dealing this check. ## Moved refcount functions to `CodeInfo` They never really made sense to exist on `Stack`. But now with the locking gone this makes even less sense. The refcount is stored inside `CodeInfo` to lets just move them there. ## Set `CodeHashLockupDepositPercent` for test runtime The test runtime was setting `CodeHashLockupDepositPercent` to zero. This was trivializing many code paths and excluded them from testing. I set it to `30%` which is our default value and fixed up all the tests that broke. This should give us confidence that the lockup doeposit collections properly works. ## Reworked the `MockExecutable` to have both a `deploy` and a `call` entry point This type used for testing could only have either entry points but not both. In order to fix the `immutable_data_set_overrides` I needed to a new function `add_both` to `MockExecutable` that allows to have both entry points. Make sure to make use of it in the future :) --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
cmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
PG Herveou <pgherveou@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
-
- Jan 24, 2025
-
-
Maksym H authored
Closes #6196 Closes #7204 Example of PR: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/6816 Every sunday 01:00 AM it's going to start to benchmark (with /cmd bench) all runtimes and all pallets Then diff total will be pushed to a branch and PR open,. I assume review-bot is going assign required reviewers per changed files I afraid each weeks will be too much to review & merge, but we can adjust later Bonus: fix for pallet_multisig lib and substrate/.maintain/frame-weight-template.hbs , which didn't let to compile new weights --------- Signed-off-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
cmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
-
- Jan 14, 2025
-
-
Sebastian Kunert authored
closes #3967 ## Changes We now use relay chain slots to measure velocity on chain. Previously we were storing the current parachain slot. Then in `on_state_proof` of the `ConsensusHook` we were checking how many blocks were athored in the current parachain slot. This works well when the parachain slot time and relay chain slot time is the same. With elastic scaling, we can have parachain slot times lower than that of the relay chain. In these cases we want to measure velocity in relation to the relay chain. This PR adjusts that. ## Migration This PR includes a migration. Storage item `SlotInfo` of pallet `aura-ext` is renamed to `RelaySlotInfo` to better reflect its new content. A migration has been added that just kills the old storage item. `RelaySlotInfo` will be `None` initially but its value will be adjusted after one new relay chain slot arrives. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
-
- Jan 05, 2025
-
-
thiolliere authored
Implement cumulus StorageWeightReclaim as wrapping transaction extension + frame system ReclaimWeight (#6140) (rebasing of https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5234) ## Issues: * Transaction extensions have weights and refund weight. So the reclaiming of unused weight must happen last in the transaction extension pipeline. Currently it is inside `CheckWeight`. * cumulus storage weight reclaim transaction extension misses the proof size of logic happening prior to itself. ## Done: * a new storage `ExtrinsicWeightReclaimed` in frame-system. Any logic which attempts to do some reclaim must use this storage to avoid double reclaim. * a new function `reclaim_weight` in frame-system pallet: info and post info in arguments, read the already reclaimed weight, calculate the new unused weight from info and post info. do the more accurate reclaim if higher. * `CheckWeight` is unchanged and still reclaim the weight in post dispatch * `ReclaimWeight` is a new transaction extension in frame system. For solo chains it must be used last in the transactino extension pipeline. It does the final most accurate reclaim * `StorageWeightReclaim` is moved from cumulus primitives into its own pallet (in order to define benchmark) and is changed into a wrapping transaction extension. It does the recording of proof size and does the reclaim using this recording and the info and post info. So parachains don't need to use `ReclaimWeight`. But also if they use it, there is no bug. ```rust /// The TransactionExtension to the basic transaction logic. pub type TxExtension = cumulus_pallet_weight_reclaim::StorageWeightReclaim< Runtime, ( frame_system::CheckNonZeroSender<Runtime>, frame_system::CheckSpecVersion<Runtime>, frame_system::CheckTxVersion<Runtime>, frame_system::CheckGenesis<Runtime>, frame_system::CheckEra<Runtime>, frame_system::CheckNonce<Runtime>, frame_system::CheckWeight<Runtime>, pallet_transaction_payment::ChargeTransactionPayment<Runtime>, BridgeRejectObsoleteHeadersAndMessages, (bridge_to_rococo_config::OnBridgeHubWestendRefundBridgeHubRococoMessages,), frame_metadata_hash_extension::CheckMetadataHash<Runtime>, ), >; ``` --------- Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by:
georgepisaltu <52418509+georgepisaltu@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Sebastian Kunert <skunert49@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Jan 03, 2025
-
-
Qiwei Yang authored
related issue: #7018 replaced duplicated whitelists with `AllPalletsWithSystem::whitelisted_storage_keys();` in this PR --------- Co-authored-by:
Guillaume Thiolliere <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
-
- Dec 20, 2024
-
-
Xavier Lau authored
It doesn't make sense to only reorder the features array. For example: This makes it hard for me to compare the dependencies and features, especially some crates have a really really long dependencies list. ```toml [dependencies] c = "*" a = "*" b = "*" [features] std = [ "a", "b", "c", ] ``` This makes my life easier. ```toml [dependencies] a = "*" b = "*" c = "*" [features] std = [ "a", "b", "c", ] ``` --------- Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Dec 19, 2024
-
-
Egor_P authored
This PR includes backport of the regular version bumps and `prdocs` reordering from the `stable2412` branch back ro master --------- Co-authored-by:
ParityReleases <release-team@parity.io> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Dec 18, 2024
-
-
Branislav Kontur authored
Relates to: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/6918 --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Dec 12, 2024
-
-
Bastian Köcher authored
Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Dec 11, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
`InitiateTransfer`, the new instruction introduced in XCMv5, allows preserving the origin after a cross-chain transfer via the usage of the `AliasOrigin` instruction. The receiving chain needs to be configured to allow such this instruction to have its intended effect and not just throw an error. In this PR, I add the alias rules specified in the [RFC for origin preservation](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/RFCs/blob/main/text/0122-alias-origin-on-asset-transfers.md) to westend chains so we can test these scenarios in the testnet. The new scenarios include: - Sending a cross-chain transfer from one system chain to another and doing a Transact on the same message (1 hop) - Sending a reserve asset transfer from one chain to another going through asset hub and doing Transact on the same message (2 hops) The updated chains are: - Relay: added `AliasChildLocation` - Collectives: added `AliasChildLocation` and `AliasOriginRootUsingFilter<AssetHubLocation, Everything>` - People: added `AliasChildLocation` and `AliasOriginRootUsingFilter<AssetHubLocation, Everything>` - Coretime: added `AliasChildLocation` and `AliasOriginRootUsingFilter<AssetHubLocation, Everything>` AssetHub already has `AliasChildLocation` and doesn't need the other config item. BridgeHub is not intended to be used by end users so I didn't add any config item. Only added `AliasChildOrigin` to the relay since we intend for it to be used less. --------- Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Dec 08, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
Last feature we wanted for V5, changing `SetAssetClaimer` to be just one of many possible "hints" that you can specify at the beginning of your program to change its behaviour. This makes it easier to add new hints in the future and have barriers accept them. --------- Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com>
-
- Dec 05, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
Closes: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/6585 Removing the `require_weight_at_most` parameter in V5 Transact had only one problem. Converting a message from V5 to V4 to send to chains that didn't upgrade yet. The conversion would not know what weight to give to the Transact, since V4 and below require it. To fix this, I added back the weight in the form of an `Option<Weight>` called `fallback_max_weight`. This can be set to `None` if you don't intend to deal with a chain that hasn't upgraded yet. If you set it to `Some(_)`, the behaviour is the same. The plan is to totally remove this in V6 since there will be a good conversion path from V6 to V5. --------- Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
-
- Dec 03, 2024
-
-
Lulu authored
-
- Nov 26, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
The `query_weight_to_asset_fee` function was trying to convert versions by using `try_as`, this function [doesn't convert from a versioned to a concrete type](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/0156ca8f/polkadot/xcm/src/lib.rs#L131). This would cause all calls with a lower version to fail. The correct function to use is the good old [try_into](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/0156ca8f /polkadot/xcm/src/lib.rs#L184). Now those calls work :) --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com>
-
- Nov 22, 2024
-
-
gupnik authored
Step in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3268 This PR adds the ability for these pallets to specify their source of the block number. This is useful when these pallets are migrated from the relay chain to a parachain and vice versa. This change is backwards compatible: 1. If the `BlockNumberProvider` continues to use the system pallet's block number 2. When a pallet deployed on the relay chain is moved to a parachain, but still uses the relay chain's block number However, we would need migrations if the deployed pallets are upgraded on an existing parachain, and the `BlockNumberProvider` uses the relay chain block number. --------- Co-authored-by:
Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com>
-
- Nov 12, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
Added `ExecuteWithOrigin` instruction according to the old XCM RFC 38: https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/xcm-format/pull/38. This instruction allows you to descend or clear while going back again. ## TODO - [x] Implementation - [x] Unit tests - [x] Integration tests - [x] Benchmarks - [x] PRDoc ## Future work Modify `WithComputedOrigin` barrier to allow, for example, fees to be paid with a descendant origin using this instruction. --------- Signed-off-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Andrii <ndk@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Joseph Zhao <65984904+programskillforverification@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
Nazar Mokrynskyi <nazar@mokrynskyi.com> Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by:
Shawn Tabrizi <shawntabrizi@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
-
- Nov 06, 2024
-
-
Francisco Aguirre authored
# Context This PR aims to introduce XCMv5, for now it's in progress and will be updated over time. This branch will serve as a milestone branch for merging in all features we want to add to XCM, roughly outlined [here](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/xcm-format/issues/60). More features could be added. ## TODO - [x] Migrate foreign assets from v3 to v4 - [x] Setup v5 skeleton - [x] Remove XCMv2 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5390 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5585 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5420 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5876 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5971 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/6148 - [x] https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/6228 Fixes #3434 Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4190 Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/5209 Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/5241 Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4284 --------- Signed-off-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Andrii <ndk@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Joseph Zhao <65984904+programskillforverification@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by:
Nazar Mokrynskyi <nazar@mokrynskyi.com> Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by:
Shawn Tabrizi <shawntabrizi@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by:
Serban Iorga <serban@parity.io>
-
- Nov 05, 2024
-
-
Nazar Mokrynskyi authored
Remove `sp_runtime::RuntimeString` and replace with `Cow<'static, str>` or `String` depending on use case (#5693) # Description As described in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4001 `RuntimeVersion` was not encoded consistently using serde. Turned out it was a remnant of old times and no longer actually needed. As such I removed it completely in this PR and replaced with `Cow<'static, str>` for spec/impl names and `String` for error cases. Fixes https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4001. ## Integration For downstream projects the upgrade will primarily consist of following two changes: ```diff #[sp_version::runtime_version] pub const VERSION: RuntimeVersion = RuntimeVersion { - spec_name: create_runtime_str!("statemine"), - impl_name: create_runtime_str!("statemine"), + spec_name: alloc::borrow::Cow::Borrowed("statemine"), + impl_name: alloc::borrow::Cow::Borrowed("statemine"), ``` ```diff fn dispatch_benchmark( config: frame_benchmarking::BenchmarkConfig - ) -> Result<Vec<frame_benchmarking::BenchmarkBatch>, sp_runtime::RuntimeString> { + ) -> Result<Vec<frame_benchmarking::BenchmarkBatch>, alloc::string::String> { ``` SCALE encoding/decoding remains the same as before, but serde encoding in runtime has changed from bytes to string (it was like this in `std` environment already), which most projects shouldn't have issues with. I consider the impact of serde encoding here low due to the type only being used in runtime version struct and mostly limited to runtime internals, where serde encoding/decoding of this data structure is quite unlikely (though we did hit exactly this edge-case ourselves
). ## Review Notes Most of the changes are trivial and mechanical, the only non-trivial change is in `substrate/primitives/version/proc-macro/src/decl_runtime_version.rs` where macro call expectation in `sp_version::runtime_version` implementation was replaced with function call expectation. # Checklist * [x] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the "Description" and its two subsections above. * [ ] My PR follows the [labeling requirements]( https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/docs/contributor/CONTRIBUTING.md#Process ) of this project (at minimum one label for `T` required) * External contributors: ask maintainers to put the right label on your PR. * [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if applicable) --------- Co-authored-by:GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by:
Guillaume Thiolliere <guillaume.thiolliere@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <info@kchr.de>
-
- Oct 29, 2024
-
-
georgepisaltu authored
This PR refactors `pallet-identity` to decouple usernames from identities. Main changes in this PR: - Separate usernames from identities in storage, allowing for correct deposit accounting - Introduce the option for username authorities to put up a deposit to issue a username - Allow authorities to remove usernames by declaring the intent to do so, then removing the username after the grace period expires - Refactor the authority storage to be keyed by suffix rather than owner account. - Introduce the concept of a system provider for a username, different from a governance allocation, allowing for usernames set by the system and not a specific authority - Implement multi-block migration to enable all of the changes described above --------- Signed-off-by:
georgepisaltu <george.pisaltu@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Ankan <10196091+Ank4n@users.noreply.github.com>
-
- Oct 21, 2024
-
-
Andrii authored
Changed returned type of API methods from `Result<bool, xcm_runtime_apis::trusted_query::Error>` to a typed one `type XcmTrustedQueryResult = Result<bool, xcm_runtime_apis::trusted_query::Error>;` Follow-up of [PR-6039](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/6039) --------- Co-authored-by:
Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de> Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
-
- Oct 18, 2024
-
-
georgepisaltu authored
Original PR https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/2280 reverted in https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3665 This PR reintroduces the reverted functionality with additional changes, related effort [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/3623). Description is copied over from the original PR First part of [Extrinsic Horizon](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/2415) Introduces a new trait `TransactionExtension` to replace `SignedExtension`. Introduce the idea of transactions which obey the runtime's extensions and have according Extension data (né Extra data) yet do not have hard-coded signatures. Deprecate the terminology of "Unsigned" when used for transactions/extrinsics owing to there now being "proper" unsigned transactions which obey the extension framework and "old-style" unsigned which do not. Instead we have __*General*__ for the former and __*Bare*__ for the latter. (Ultimately, the latter will be phased out as a type of transaction, and Bare will only be used for Inherents.) Types of extrinsic are now therefore: - Bare (no hardcoded signature, no Extra data; used to be known as "Unsigned") - Bare transactions (deprecated): Gossiped, validated with `ValidateUnsigned` (deprecated) and the `_bare_compat` bits of `TransactionExtension` (deprecated). - Inherents: Not gossiped, validated with `ProvideInherent`. - Extended (Extra data): Gossiped, validated via `TransactionExtension`. - Signed transactions (with a hardcoded signature) in extrinsic v4. - General transactions (without a hardcoded signature) in extrinsic v5. `TransactionExtension` differs from `SignedExtension` because: - A signature on the underlying transaction may validly not be present. - It may alter the origin during validation. - `pre_dispatch` is renamed to `prepare` and need not contain the checks present in `validate`. - `validate` and `prepare` is passed an `Origin` rather than a `AccountId`. - `validate` may pass arbitrary information into `prepare` via a new user-specifiable type `Val`. - `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to `Implicit`/`implicit`. It is encoded *for the entire transaction* and passed in to each extension as a new argument to `validate`. This facilitates the ability of extensions to acts as underlying crypto. There is a new `DispatchTransaction` trait which contains only default function impls and is impl'ed for any `TransactionExtension` impler. It provides several utility functions which reduce some of the tedium from using `TransactionExtension` (indeed, none of its regular functions should now need to be called directly). Three transaction version discriminator ("versions") are now permissible (RFC [here](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/RFCs/pull/84)) in extrinsic version 5: - 0b00000100 or 0b00000101: Bare (used to be called "Unsigned"): contains Signature or Extra (extension data). After bare transactions are no longer supported, this will strictly identify an Inherents only. Available in both extrinsic versions 4 and 5. - 0b10000100: Old-school "Signed" Transaction: contains Signature, Extra (extension data) and an extension version byte, introduced as part of [RFC99](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/RFCs/blob/main/text/0099-transaction-extension-version.md). Still available as part of extrinsic v4. - 0b01000101: New-school "General" Transaction: contains Extra (extension data) and an extension version byte, as per RFC99, but no Signature. Only available in extrinsic v5. For the New-school General Transaction, it becomes trivial for authors to publish extensions to the mechanism for authorizing an Origin, e.g. through new kinds of key-signing schemes, ZK proofs, pallet state, mutations over pre-authenticated origins or any combination of the above. `UncheckedExtrinsic` still maintains encode/decode backwards compatibility with extrinsic version 4, where the first byte was encoded as: - 0b00000100 - Unsigned transactions - 0b10000100 - Old-school Signed transactions, without the extension version byte Now, `UncheckedExtrinsic` contains a `Preamble` and the actual call. The `Preamble` describes the type of extrinsic as follows: ```rust /// A "header" for extrinsics leading up to the call itself. Determines the type of extrinsic and /// holds any necessary specialized data. #[derive(Eq, PartialEq, Clone)] pub enum Preamble<Address, Signature, Extension> { /// An extrinsic without a signature or any extension. This means it's either an inherent or /// an old-school "Unsigned" (we don't use that terminology any more since it's confusable with /// the general transaction which is without a signature but does have an extension). /// /// NOTE: In the future, once we remove `ValidateUnsigned`, this will only serve Inherent /// extrinsics and thus can be renamed to `Inherent`. Bare(ExtrinsicVersion), /// An old-school transaction extrinsic which includes a signature of some hard-coded crypto. /// Available only on extrinsic version 4. Signed(Address, Signature, ExtensionVersion, Extension), /// A new-school transaction extrinsic which does not include a signature by default. The /// origin authorization, through signatures or other means, is performed by the transaction /// extension in this extrinsic. Available starting with extrinsic version 5. General(ExtensionVersion, Extension), } ``` ## Code Migration ### NOW: Getting it to build Wrap your `SignedExtension`s in `AsTransactionExtension`. This should be accompanied by renaming your aggregate type in line with the new terminology. E.g. Before: ```rust /// The SignedExtension to the basic transaction logic. pub type SignedExtra = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension, ); /// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime. pub type UncheckedExtrinsic = generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, SignedExtra>; ``` After: ```rust /// The extension to the basic transaction logic. pub type TxExtension = ( /* snip */ AsTransactionExtension<MySpecialSignedExtension>, ); /// Unchecked extrinsic type as expected by this runtime. pub type UncheckedExtrinsic = generic::UncheckedExtrinsic<Address, RuntimeCall, Signature, TxExtension>; ``` You'll also need to alter any transaction building logic to add a `.into()` to make the conversion happen. E.g. Before: ```rust fn construct_extrinsic( /* snip */ ) -> UncheckedExtrinsic { let extra: SignedExtra = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */), ); let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), extra.clone()).unwrap(); let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e)); UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed( /* snip */ Signature::Sr25519(signature), extra, ) } ``` After: ```rust fn construct_extrinsic( /* snip */ ) -> UncheckedExtrinsic { let tx_ext: TxExtension = ( /* snip */ MySpecialSignedExtension::new(/* snip */).into(), ); let payload = SignedPayload::new(call.clone(), tx_ext.clone()).unwrap(); let signature = payload.using_encoded(|e| sender.sign(e)); UncheckedExtrinsic::new_signed( /* snip */ Signature::Sr25519(signature), tx_ext, ) } ``` ### SOON: Migrating to `TransactionExtension` Most `SignedExtension`s can be trivially converted to become a `TransactionExtension`. There are a few things to know. - Instead of a single trait like `SignedExtension`, you should now implement two traits individually: `TransactionExtensionBase` and `TransactionExtension`. - Weights are now a thing and must be provided via the new function `fn weight`. #### `TransactionExtensionBase` This trait takes care of anything which is not dependent on types specific to your runtime, most notably `Call`. - `AdditionalSigned`/`additional_signed` is renamed to `Implicit`/`implicit`. - Weight must be returned by implementing the `weight` function. If your extension is associated with a pallet, you'll probably want to do this via the pallet's existing benchmarking infrastructure. #### `TransactionExtension` Generally: - `pre_dispatch` is now `prepare` and you *should not reexecute the `validate` functionality in there*! - You don't get an account ID any more; you get an origin instead. If you need to presume an account ID, then you can use the trait function `AsSystemOriginSigner::as_system_origin_signer`. - You get an additional ticket, similar to `Pre`, called `Val`. This defines data which is passed from `validate` into `prepare`. This is important since you should not be duplicating logic from `validate` to `prepare`, you need a way of passing your working from the former into the latter. This is it. - This trait takes a `Call` type parameter. `Call` is the runtime call type which used to be an associated type; you can just move it to become a type parameter for your trait impl. - There's no `AccountId` associated type any more. Just remove it. Regarding `validate`: - You get three new parameters in `validate`; all can be ignored when migrating from `SignedExtension`. - `validate` returns a tuple on success; the second item in the tuple is the new ticket type `Self::Val` which gets passed in to `prepare`. If you use any information extracted during `validate` (off-chain and on-chain, non-mutating) in `prepare` (on-chain, mutating) then you can pass it through with this. For the tuple's last item, just return the `origin` argument. Regarding `prepare`: - This is renamed from `pre_dispatch`, but there is one change: - FUNCTIONALITY TO VALIDATE THE TRANSACTION NEED NOT BE DUPLICATED FROM `validate`!! - (This is different to `SignedExtension` which was required to run the same checks in `pre_dispatch` as in `validate`.) Regarding `post_dispatch`: - Since there are no unsigned transactions handled by `TransactionExtension`, `Pre` is always defined, so the first parameter is `Self::Pre` rather than `Option<Self::Pre>`. If you make use of `SignedExtension::validate_unsigned` or `SignedExtension::pre_dispatch_unsigned`, then: - Just use the regular versions of these functions instead. - Have your logic execute in the case that the `origin` is `None`. - Ensure your transaction creation logic creates a General Transaction rather than a Bare Transaction; this means having to include all `TransactionExtension`s' data. - `ValidateUnsigned` can still be used (for now) if you need to be able to construct transactions which contain none of the extension data, however these will be phased out in stage 2 of the Transactions Horizon, so you should consider moving to an extension-centric design. --------- Signed-off-by:
georgepisaltu <george.pisaltu@parity.io> Co-authored-by:
Guillaume Thiolliere <gui.thiolliere@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>
-
- Oct 17, 2024
-
-
Andrii authored
Implemented is_trusted_reserve and is_trusted_teleporter API methods. Tested them with regular and chopstick tests. Fixes #97 --------- Co-authored-by:
Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
-
- Oct 07, 2024
-
-
Juan Ignacio Rios authored
# Description ## What? Make it possible for other pallets to implement their own logic when a slash on a balance occurs. ## Why? In the [introduction of holds](https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/12951) @gavofyork said: > Since Holds are designed to be infallibly slashed, this means that any logic using a Freeze must handle the possibility of the frozen amount being reduced, potentially to zero. A permissionless function should be provided in order to allow bookkeeping to be updated in this instance. At Polimec we needed to find a way to reduce the vesting schedules of our users after a slash was made, and after talking to @Kianenigma at the Web3Summit, we realized there was no easy way to implement this with the current traits, so we came up with this solution. ## How? - First we abstract the `done_slash` function of holds::Balanced to it's own trait that any pallet can implement. - Then we add a config type in pallet-balances that accepts a callback tuple of all the pallets that implement this trait. - Finally implement done_slash for pallet-balances such that it calls the config type. ## Integration The default implementation of done_slash is still an empty function, and the new config type of pallet-balances can be set to an empty tuple, so nothing changes by default. ## Review Notes - I suggest to focus on the first commit which contains the main logic changes. - I also have a working implementation of done_slash for pallet_vesting, should I add it to this PR? - If I run `cargo +nightly fmt --all` then I get changes to a lot of unrelated crates, so not sure if I should run it to avoid the fmt failure of the CI - Should I hunt down references to fungible/fungibles documentation and update it accordingly? **Polkadot address:** `15fj1UhQp8Xes7y7LSmDYTy349mXvUwrbNmLaP5tQKBxsQY1` # Checklist * [x] My PR includes a detailed description as outlined in the "Description" and its two subsections above. * [x] My PR follows the [labeling requirements]( https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/docs/contributor/CONTRIBUTING.md#Process ) of this project (at minimum one label for `T` required) * External contributors: ask maintainers to put the right label on your PR. * [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if applicable) --------- Co-authored-by:
Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
Francisco Aguirre <franciscoaguirreperez@gmail.com>
-
- Oct 02, 2024
-
-
Andrii authored
Added `HashedDescription<AccountId, DescribeFamily<DescribeAllTerminal>>` foreign locations to local accounts converter to all the parachains. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <> Co-authored-by:
Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
-