Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 95f1b09b authored by Robert Klotzner's avatar Robert Klotzner Committed by GitHub
Browse files

Fix links in docs. (#2556)

parent 1bec8cfe
No related merge requests found
...@@ -46,11 +46,8 @@ backers, not all of them are required to have the needed chunk. This in turn ...@@ -46,11 +46,8 @@ backers, not all of them are required to have the needed chunk. This in turn
could lead to low throughput, as we have to wait for a fetches to fail, could lead to low throughput, as we have to wait for a fetches to fail,
before reaching a validator finally having our chunk. We do rank back validators before reaching a validator finally having our chunk. We do rank back validators
not delivering our chunk, but as backers could vary from block to block on a not delivering our chunk, but as backers could vary from block to block on a
perfectly legitimate basis, this is still not ideal. See the following issues perfectly legitimate basis, this is still not ideal. See issues [2509](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/issues/2509) and [2512](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/issues/2512)
for more information: for more information.
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/issues/2509
https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/issues/2512
The current implementation also only fetches chunks for occupied cores in blocks The current implementation also only fetches chunks for occupied cores in blocks
in active leaves. This means though, if active leaves skips a block or we are in active leaves. This means though, if active leaves skips a block or we are
......
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment