Newer
Older
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Open(12));
// chill et. al. are now not allowed.
assert_noop!(
Staking::chill(Origin::signed(10)),
Error::<Test>::CallNotAllowed,
);
})
}
#[test]
fn signed_result_can_be_submitted() {
// should check that we have a new validator set normally, event says that it comes from
// offchain.
ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.build()
.execute_with(|| {
run_to_block(12);
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Open(12));
assert!(Staking::snapshot_validators().is_some());
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, 2, |_| {});
assert_ok!(submit_solution(
Origin::signed(10),
winners,
compact,
score,
));
let queued_result = Staking::queued_elected().unwrap();
assert_eq!(queued_result.compute, ElectionCompute::Signed);
assert_eq!(
System::events()
.into_iter()
.map(|r| r.event)
.filter_map(|e| {
if let MetaEvent::staking(inner) = e {
Some(inner)
} else {
None
}
})
.last()
.unwrap(),
RawEvent::SolutionStored(ElectionCompute::Signed),
);
3049
3050
3051
3052
3053
3054
3055
3056
3057
3058
3059
3060
3061
3062
3063
3064
3065
3066
3067
3068
3069
3070
3071
3072
3073
3074
3075
3076
3077
3078
3079
3080
run_to_block(15);
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Closed);
assert_eq!(
System::events()
.into_iter()
.map(|r| r.event)
.filter_map(|e| {
if let MetaEvent::staking(inner) = e {
Some(inner)
} else {
None
}
})
.last()
.unwrap(),
RawEvent::StakingElection(ElectionCompute::Signed),
);
})
}
#[test]
fn signed_result_can_be_submitted_later() {
// same as `signed_result_can_be_submitted` but at a later block.
ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.build()
.execute_with(|| {
run_to_block(14);
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Open(12));
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, 2, |_| {});
assert_ok!(submit_solution(Origin::signed(10), winners, compact, score));
3083
3084
3085
3086
3087
3088
3089
3090
3091
3092
3093
3094
3095
3096
3097
3098
3099
3100
3101
3102
3103
3104
3105
3106
3107
3108
3109
let queued_result = Staking::queued_elected().unwrap();
assert_eq!(queued_result.compute, ElectionCompute::Signed);
run_to_block(15);
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Closed);
assert_eq!(
System::events()
.into_iter()
.map(|r| r.event)
.filter_map(|e| {
if let MetaEvent::staking(inner) = e {
Some(inner)
} else {
None
}
})
.last()
.unwrap(),
RawEvent::StakingElection(ElectionCompute::Signed),
);
})
}
#[test]
fn early_solution_submission_is_rejected() {
// should check that we have a new validator set normally, event says that it comes from
// offchain.
ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.build()
.execute_with(|| {
run_to_block(11);
// submission is not yet allowed
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Closed);
// create all the indices just to build the solution.
Staking::create_stakers_snapshot();
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, 2, |_| {});
Staking::kill_stakers_snapshot();
assert_err_with_weight!(
Staking::submit_election_solution(
Origin::signed(10),
winners.clone(),
compact.clone(),
current_era(),
ElectionSize::default(),
),
Error::<Test>::PhragmenEarlySubmission,
Some(<Test as frame_system::Trait>::DbWeight::get().reads(1)),
);
})
}
#[test]
fn weak_solution_is_rejected() {
// A solution which is weaker than what we currently have on-chain is rejected.
ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.has_stakers(false)
.validator_count(4)
.build()
.execute_with(|| {
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
run_to_block(12);
// a good solution
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, 2, |_| {});
assert_ok!(submit_solution(
Origin::signed(10),
winners,
compact,
score,
));
// a bad solution
let (compact, winners, score) = horrible_phragmen_with_post_processing(false);
assert_err_with_weight!(
submit_solution(
winners.clone(),
compact.clone(),
score,
),
Error::<Test>::PhragmenWeakSubmission,
Some(<Test as frame_system::Trait>::DbWeight::get().reads(3))
);
})
}
#[test]
fn better_solution_is_accepted() {
// A solution which is better than what we currently have on-chain is accepted.
ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.validator_count(4)
.has_stakers(false)
.build()
.execute_with(|| {
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
run_to_block(12);
// a meeeeh solution
let (compact, winners, score) = horrible_phragmen_with_post_processing(false);
assert_ok!(submit_solution(
Origin::signed(10),
winners,
compact,
score,
));
// a better solution
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, 2, |_| {});
assert_ok!(submit_solution(
Origin::signed(10),
winners,
compact,
score,
));
})
}
#[test]
fn offchain_worker_runs_when_window_open() {
// at the end of the first finalized block with ElectionStatus::open(_), it should execute.
let mut ext = ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.validator_count(2)
.build();
3216
3217
3218
3219
3220
3221
3222
3223
3224
3225
3226
3227
3228
3229
3230
3231
3232
3233
3234
3235
3236
3237
3238
ext.execute_with(|| {
run_to_block(12);
// local key 11 is in the elected set.
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![11, 21]);
assert_eq!(state.read().transactions.len(), 0);
Staking::offchain_worker(12);
assert_eq!(state.read().transactions.len(), 1);
let encoded = state.read().transactions[0].clone();
let extrinsic: Extrinsic = Decode::decode(&mut &*encoded).unwrap();
let call = extrinsic.call;
let inner = match call {
mock::Call::Staking(inner) => inner,
};
assert_eq!(
<Staking as sp_runtime::traits::ValidateUnsigned>::validate_unsigned(
TransactionSource::Local,
&inner,
),
TransactionValidity::Ok(ValidTransaction {
priority: UnsignedPriority::get() + 1125, // the proposed slot stake.
provides: vec![("StakingOffchain", current_era()).encode()],
longevity: 3,
propagate: false,
})
)
})
}
#[test]
fn offchain_worker_runs_with_equalise() {
// Offchain worker equalises based on the number provided by randomness. See the difference
// in the priority, which comes from the computed score.
let mut ext = ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.validator_count(2)
.max_offchain_iterations(2)
.build();
3259
3260
3261
3262
3263
3264
3265
3266
3267
3268
3269
3270
3271
3272
3273
3274
3275
3276
3277
3278
3279
3280
3281
3282
3283
3284
3285
3286
3287
3288
3289
3290
3291
3292
ext.execute_with(|| {
run_to_block(12);
// local key 11 is in the elected set.
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![11, 21]);
assert_eq!(state.read().transactions.len(), 0);
Staking::offchain_worker(12);
assert_eq!(state.read().transactions.len(), 1);
let encoded = state.read().transactions[0].clone();
let extrinsic: Extrinsic = Decode::decode(&mut &*encoded).unwrap();
let call = extrinsic.call;
let inner = match call {
mock::Call::Staking(inner) => inner,
};
assert_eq!(
<Staking as sp_runtime::traits::ValidateUnsigned>::validate_unsigned(
TransactionSource::Local,
&inner,
),
TransactionValidity::Ok(ValidTransaction {
// the proposed slot stake, with equalize.
priority: UnsignedPriority::get() + 1250,
requires: vec![],
provides: vec![("StakingOffchain", active_era()).encode()],
longevity: 3,
propagate: false,
})
)
})
}
#[test]
fn mediocre_submission_from_authority_is_early_rejected() {
let mut ext = ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.validator_count(4)
.build();
ext.execute_with(|| {
run_to_block(12);
// put a good solution on-chain
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, 2, |_| {});
assert_ok!(submit_solution(
3305
3306
3307
3308
3309
3310
3311
3312
3313
3314
3315
3316
3317
3318
3319
3320
3321
3322
3323
3324
3325
3326
3327
3328
3329
3330
3331
3332
3333
3334
3335
3336
3337
3338
3339
3340
3341
3342
3343
3344
3345
3346
3347
Origin::signed(10),
winners,
compact,
score,
),);
// now run the offchain worker in the same chain state.
Staking::offchain_worker(12);
assert_eq!(state.read().transactions.len(), 1);
let encoded = state.read().transactions[0].clone();
let extrinsic: Extrinsic = Decode::decode(&mut &*encoded).unwrap();
let call = extrinsic.call;
let inner = match call {
mock::Call::Staking(inner) => inner,
};
// pass this call to ValidateUnsigned
assert_eq!(
<Staking as sp_runtime::traits::ValidateUnsigned>::validate_unsigned(
TransactionSource::Local,
&inner,
),
TransactionValidity::Err(
InvalidTransaction::Custom(<Error<Test>>::PhragmenWeakSubmission.as_u8()).into(),
),
)
})
}
#[test]
fn invalid_phragmen_result_correct_number_of_winners() {
ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.validator_count(4)
.has_stakers(false)
.build()
.execute_with(|| {
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
run_to_block(12);
ValidatorCount::put(3);
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, 2, |_| {});
ValidatorCount::put(4);
assert_eq!(winners.len(), 3);
3353
3354
3355
3356
3357
3358
3359
3360
3361
3362
3363
3364
3365
3366
3367
3368
3369
3370
3371
3372
3373
3374
assert_noop!(
submit_solution(
Origin::signed(10),
winners,
compact,
score,
),
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusWinnerCount,
);
})
}
#[test]
fn invalid_phragmen_result_solution_size() {
ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.build()
.execute_with(|| {
run_to_block(12);
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, 2, |_| {});
assert_noop!(
Staking::submit_election_solution(
Origin::signed(10),
winners,
compact,
score,
current_era(),
ElectionSize::default(),
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusElectionSize,
);
})
}
#[test]
fn invalid_phragmen_result_correct_number_of_winners_1() {
// if we have too little validators, then the number of candidates is the bound.
ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.validator_count(8) // we simply cannot elect 8
.has_stakers(false)
.build()
.execute_with(|| {
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
run_to_block(12);
ValidatorCount::put(3);
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, 2, |_| {});
ValidatorCount::put(4);
assert_eq!(winners.len(), 3);
assert_noop!(
3409
3410
3411
3412
3413
3414
3415
3416
3417
3418
3419
3420
3421
3422
3423
3424
3425
3426
3427
3428
3429
3430
Origin::signed(10),
winners,
compact,
score,
),
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusWinnerCount,
);
})
}
#[test]
fn invalid_phragmen_result_correct_number_of_winners_2() {
// if we have too little validators, then the number of candidates is the bound.
ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.validator_count(8) // we simply cannot elect 8
.has_stakers(false)
.build()
.execute_with(|| {
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
run_to_block(12);
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, 2, |_| {});
assert_eq!(winners.len(), 4);
// all good. We chose 4 and it works.
assert_ok!(submit_solution(
3437
3438
3439
3440
3441
3442
3443
3444
3445
3446
3447
3448
3449
3450
3451
3452
3453
3454
3455
3456
3457
3458
Origin::signed(10),
winners,
compact,
score,
),);
})
}
#[test]
fn invalid_phragmen_result_out_of_bound_nominator_index() {
// A nominator index which is simply invalid
ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.validator_count(4)
.has_stakers(false)
.build()
.execute_with(|| {
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
run_to_block(12);
assert_eq!(Staking::snapshot_nominators().unwrap().len(), 5 + 4);
assert_eq!(Staking::snapshot_validators().unwrap().len(), 4);
let (mut compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, 2, |_| {});
// index 9 doesn't exist.
compact.votes1.push((9, 2));
// The error type sadly cannot be more specific now.
assert_noop!(
3467
3468
3469
3470
3471
3472
3473
3474
3475
3476
3477
3478
3479
3480
3481
3482
3483
3484
3485
3486
3487
3488
3489
3490
Origin::signed(10),
winners,
compact,
score,
),
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusCompact,
);
})
}
#[test]
fn invalid_phragmen_result_out_of_bound_validator_index() {
// A validator index which is out of bound
ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.validator_count(4)
.has_stakers(false)
.build()
.execute_with(|| {
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
run_to_block(12);
assert_eq!(Staking::snapshot_nominators().unwrap().len(), 5 + 4);
assert_eq!(Staking::snapshot_validators().unwrap().len(), 4);
let (mut compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, 2, |_| {});
// index 4 doesn't exist.
compact.votes1.push((3, 4));
// The error type sadly cannot be more specific now.
assert_noop!(
3499
3500
3501
3502
3503
3504
3505
3506
3507
3508
3509
3510
3511
3512
3513
3514
3515
3516
3517
3518
3519
3520
3521
3522
Origin::signed(10),
winners,
compact,
score,
),
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusCompact,
);
})
}
#[test]
fn invalid_phragmen_result_out_of_bound_winner_index() {
// A winner index which is simply invalid
ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.validator_count(4)
.has_stakers(false)
.build()
.execute_with(|| {
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
run_to_block(12);
assert_eq!(Staking::snapshot_nominators().unwrap().len(), 5 + 4);
assert_eq!(Staking::snapshot_validators().unwrap().len(), 4);
let (compact, _, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, 2, |_| {});
// index 4 doesn't exist.
let winners = vec![0, 1, 2, 4];
assert_noop!(
3530
3531
3532
3533
3534
3535
3536
3537
3538
3539
3540
3541
3542
3543
3544
3545
3546
3547
3548
3549
3550
3551
3552
3553
3554
Origin::signed(10),
winners,
compact,
score,
),
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusWinner,
);
})
}
#[test]
fn invalid_phragmen_result_non_winner_validator_index() {
// An edge that points to a correct validator index who is NOT a winner. This is very
// similar to the test that raises `PhragmenBogusNomination`.
ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.validator_count(2) // we select only 2.
.has_stakers(false)
.build()
.execute_with(|| {
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
run_to_block(12);
assert_eq!(Staking::snapshot_nominators().unwrap().len(), 5 + 4);
assert_eq!(Staking::snapshot_validators().unwrap().len(), 4);
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, 2, |a| {
a.iter_mut()
.find(|x| x.who == 5)
// all 3 cannot be among the winners. Although, all of them are validator
// candidates.
.map(|x| x.distribution = vec![(21, 50), (41, 30), (31, 20)]);
});
assert_noop!(
3565
3566
3567
3568
3569
3570
3571
3572
3573
3574
3575
3576
3577
3578
3579
3580
3581
3582
3583
3584
3585
3586
Origin::signed(10),
winners,
compact,
score,
),
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusEdge,
);
})
}
#[test]
fn invalid_phragmen_result_wrong_self_vote() {
// A self vote for someone else.
ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.validator_count(4)
.has_stakers(false)
.build()
.execute_with(|| {
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
run_to_block(12);
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, 2, |a| {
// mutate a self vote to target someone else. That someone else is still among the
// winners
a.iter_mut().find(|x| x.who == 11).map(|x| {
x.distribution
.iter_mut()
.find(|y| y.0 == 11)
.map(|y| y.0 = 21)
});
});
assert_noop!(
3600
3601
3602
3603
3604
3605
3606
3607
3608
3609
3610
3611
3612
3613
3614
3615
3616
3617
3618
3619
3620
3621
Origin::signed(10),
winners,
compact,
score,
),
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusSelfVote,
);
})
}
#[test]
fn invalid_phragmen_result_wrong_self_vote_2() {
// A self validator voting for someone else next to self vote.
ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.validator_count(4)
.has_stakers(false)
.build()
.execute_with(|| {
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
run_to_block(12);
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(true, 2, |a| {
// Remove the self vote.
a.retain(|x| x.who != 11);
// add is as a new double vote
a.push(StakedAssignment {
who: 11,
distribution: vec![(11, 50), (21, 50)],
});
});
// This raises score issue.
assert_noop!(
3635
3636
3637
3638
3639
3640
3641
3642
3643
3644
3645
3646
3647
3648
3649
3650
3651
3652
3653
3654
3655
3656
3657
3658
Origin::signed(10),
winners,
compact,
score,
),
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusSelfVote,
);
})
}
#[test]
fn invalid_phragmen_result_over_stake() {
// Someone's edge ratios sums to more than 100%.
ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.validator_count(4)
.has_stakers(false)
.build()
.execute_with(|| {
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
run_to_block(12);
// Note: we don't reduce here to be able to tweak votes3. votes3 will vanish if you
// reduce.
let (mut compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(false, 0, |_| {});
if let Some(c) = compact.votes3.iter_mut().find(|x| x.0 == 0) {
// by default it should have been (0, [(2, 33%), (1, 33%)], 0)
// now the sum is above 100%
c.1 = [(2, percent(66)), (1, percent(66))];
}
assert_noop!(
3669
3670
3671
3672
3673
3674
3675
3676
3677
3678
3679
3680
3681
3682
3683
3684
3685
3686
3687
3688
3689
3690
3691
3692
3693
3694
3695
3696
3697
3698
3699
Origin::signed(10),
winners,
compact,
score,
),
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusCompact,
);
})
}
#[test]
fn invalid_phragmen_result_under_stake() {
// at the time of this writing, we cannot under stake someone. The compact assignment works
// in a way that some of the stakes are presented by the submitter, and the last one is read
// from chain by subtracting the rest from total. Hence, the sum is always correct.
// This test is only here as a demonstration.
}
#[test]
fn invalid_phragmen_result_invalid_target_stealing() {
// A valid voter who voted for someone who is a candidate, and is a correct winner, but is
// actually NOT nominated by this nominator.
ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.validator_count(4)
.has_stakers(false)
.build()
.execute_with(|| {
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
run_to_block(12);
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(false, 0, |a| {
// 3 only voted for 20 and 40. We add a fake vote to 30. The stake sum is still
// correctly 100.
a.iter_mut()
.find(|x| x.who == 3)
.map(|x| x.distribution = vec![(21, 50), (41, 30), (31, 20)]);
});
assert_noop!(
3710
3711
3712
3713
3714
3715
3716
3717
3718
3719
3720
3721
3722
3723
3724
3725
3726
3727
3728
3729
3730
3731
3732
3733
3734
3735
3736
Origin::signed(10),
winners,
compact,
score,
),
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusNomination,
);
})
}
#[test]
fn nomination_slash_filter_is_checked() {
// If a nominator has voted for someone who has been recently slashed, that particular
// nomination should be disabled for the upcoming election. A solution must respect this
// rule.
ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.validator_count(4)
.has_stakers(false)
.build()
.execute_with(|| {
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
// finalize the round with fallback. This is needed since all nominator submission
// are in era zero and we want this one to pass with no problems.
run_to_block(15);
// go to the next session to trigger mock::start_era and bump the active era
run_to_block(20);
// slash 10. This must happen outside of the election window.
let offender_expo = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 11);
on_offence_now(
&[OffenceDetails {
offender: (11, offender_expo.clone()),
reporters: vec![],
}],
&[Perbill::from_percent(50)],
);
// validate 10 again for the next round. But this guy will not have the votes that
// it should have had from 1 and 2.
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(
Origin::signed(10),
Default::default()
));
// open the election window and create snapshots.
run_to_block(32);
// a solution that has been prepared after the slash.
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(false, 0, |a| {
// no one is allowed to vote for 10, except for itself.
a.into_iter()
.filter(|s| s.who != 11)
.for_each(|s|
assert!(s.distribution.iter().find(|(t, _)| *t == 11).is_none())
);
});
// can be submitted.
assert_ok!(submit_solution(
Origin::signed(10),
winners,
compact,
score,
));
// a wrong solution.
let (compact, winners, score) = prepare_submission_with(false, 0, |a| {
// add back the vote that has been filtered out.
a.push(StakedAssignment {
who: 1,
distribution: vec![(11, 100)]
});
});
// is rejected.
assert_noop!(
3790
3791
3792
3793
3794
3795
3796
3797
3798
3799
3800
3801
3802
3803
3804
3805
3806
3807
3808
3809
3810
3811
Origin::signed(10),
winners,
compact,
score,
),
Error::<Test>::PhragmenSlashedNomination,
);
})
}
#[test]
fn invalid_phragmen_result_wrong_score() {
// A valid voter who's total distributed stake is more than what they bond
ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.validator_count(4)
.has_stakers(false)
.build()
.execute_with(|| {
build_offchain_phragmen_test_ext();
run_to_block(12);
let (compact, winners, mut score) = prepare_submission_with(true, 2, |_| {});
score[0] += 1;
assert_noop!(
Origin::signed(10),
winners,
compact,
score,
),
Error::<Test>::PhragmenBogusScore,
);
})
}
#[test]
fn offchain_storage_is_set() {
let mut ext = ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.validator_count(4)
.build();
3834
3835
3836
3837
3838
3839
3840
3841
3842
3843
3844
3845
3846
3847
3848
3849
3850
3851
3852
3853
3854
3855
3856
ext.execute_with(|| {
use offchain_election::OFFCHAIN_HEAD_DB;
use sp_runtime::offchain::storage::StorageValueRef;
run_to_block(12);
Staking::offchain_worker(12);
// it works
assert_eq!(state.read().transactions.len(), 1);
// and it is set
let storage = StorageValueRef::persistent(&OFFCHAIN_HEAD_DB);
assert_eq!(storage.get::<BlockNumber>().unwrap().unwrap(), 12);
})
}
#[test]
fn offchain_storage_prevents_duplicate() {
let mut ext = ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.validator_count(4)
.build();
3858
3859
3860
3861
3862
3863
3864
3865
3866
3867
3868
3869
3870
3871
3872
3873
3874
3875
3876
3877
3878
3879
3880
3881
3882
3883
3884
3885
3886
3887
3888
3889
3890
3891
3892
3893
3894
3895
3896
3897
3898
3899
3900
3901
3902
3903
3904
3905
3906
ext.execute_with(|| {
use offchain_election::OFFCHAIN_HEAD_DB;
use sp_runtime::offchain::storage::StorageValueRef;
let storage = StorageValueRef::persistent(&OFFCHAIN_HEAD_DB);
run_to_block(12);
// first run -- ok
assert_eq!(
offchain_election::set_check_offchain_execution_status::<Test>(12),
Ok(()),
);
assert_eq!(storage.get::<BlockNumber>().unwrap().unwrap(), 12);
// re-execute after the next. not allowed.
assert_eq!(
offchain_election::set_check_offchain_execution_status::<Test>(13),
Err("recently executed."),
);
// a fork like situation -- re-execute 10, 11, 12. But it won't go through.
assert_eq!(
offchain_election::set_check_offchain_execution_status::<Test>(10),
Err("fork."),
);
assert_eq!(
offchain_election::set_check_offchain_execution_status::<Test>(11),
Err("fork."),
);
assert_eq!(
offchain_election::set_check_offchain_execution_status::<Test>(12),
Err("recently executed."),
);
})
}
#[test]
#[should_panic]
fn offence_is_blocked_when_window_open() {
ExtBuilder::default()
.offchain_phragmen_ext()
.validator_count(4)
.has_stakers(false)
.build()
.execute_with(|| {
run_to_block(12);
assert_eq!(Staking::era_election_status(), ElectionStatus::Open(12));
let offender_expo = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, 10);
// panic from the impl in mock
on_offence_now(
&[OffenceDetails {
offender: (10, offender_expo.clone()),
reporters: vec![],
}],
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
);
})
}
}
fn slash_kicks_validators_not_nominators_and_disables_nominator_for_kicked_validator() {
ExtBuilder::default().build_and_execute(|| {
assert_eq_uvec!(Session::validators(), vec![11, 21]);
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 1000);
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(101), 2000);
// 11 and 21 both have the support of 100
let exposure_11 = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, &11);
let exposure_21 = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, &21);
assert_eq!(exposure_11.total, 1000 + 125);
assert_eq!(exposure_21.total, 1000 + 375);
on_offence_now(
&[OffenceDetails {
offender: (11, exposure_11.clone()),
reporters: vec![],
}],
&[Perbill::from_percent(10)],
);
// post-slash balance
let nominator_slash_amount_11 = 125 / 10;
assert_eq!(Balances::free_balance(11), 900);
assert_eq!(
Balances::free_balance(101),
2000 - nominator_slash_amount_11
);
// This is the best way to check that the validator was chilled; `get` will
// return default value.
for (stash, _) in <Staking as Store>::Validators::iter() {
assert!(stash != 11);
}
let nominations = <Staking as Store>::Nominators::get(&101).unwrap();
// and make sure that the vote will be ignored even if the validator
// re-registers.
let last_slash = <Staking as Store>::SlashingSpans::get(&11)
.unwrap()
.last_nonzero_slash();
assert!(nominations.submitted_in < last_slash);
// actually re-bond the slashed validator
assert_ok!(Staking::validate(Origin::signed(10), Default::default()));
let exposure_11 = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, &11);
let exposure_21 = Staking::eras_stakers(Staking::active_era().unwrap().index, &21);
// 10 is re-elected, but without the support of 100
assert_eq!(exposure_11.total, 900);
// 20 is re-elected, with the (almost) entire support of 100
assert_eq!(exposure_21.total, 1000 + 500 - nominator_slash_amount_11);
}
#[test]
fn claim_reward_at_the_last_era_and_no_double_claim_and_invalid_claim() {
// should check that:
// * rewards get paid until history_depth for both validators and nominators
// * an invalid era to claim doesn't update last_reward
// * double claim of one era fails
ExtBuilder::default().nominate(true).build_and_execute(|| {
let init_balance_10 = Balances::total_balance(&10);
let init_balance_100 = Balances::total_balance(&100);
let part_for_10 = Perbill::from_rational_approximation::<u32>(1000, 1125);
let part_for_100 = Perbill::from_rational_approximation::<u32>(125, 1125);
// Check state
Payee::<Test>::insert(11, RewardDestination::Controller);
Payee::<Test>::insert(101, RewardDestination::Controller);