Skip to content
GitLab
Projects
Groups
Snippets
/
Help
Help
Support
Community forum
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Sign in
Toggle navigation
Menu
Open sidebar
parity
Mirrored projects
polkadot
Commits
7754c036
Unverified
Commit
7754c036
authored
Feb 24, 2021
by
asynchronous rob
Committed by
GitHub
Feb 24, 2021
Browse files
merge approval-checking feature back into real-overseer (#2518)
parent
680a8777
Pipeline
#125646
canceled with stages
in 23 minutes and 57 seconds
Changes
4
Pipelines
1
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Cargo.toml
View file @
7754c036
...
...
@@ -91,7 +91,6 @@ panic = "unwind"
[features]
runtime-benchmarks
=
["cli/runtime-benchmarks"]
real-overseer
=
["cli/real-overseer"]
approval-checking
=[
"real-overseer"
,
"service/approval-checking"
]
try-runtime
=
["cli/try-runtime"]
# Configuration for building a .deb package - for use with `cargo-deb`
...
...
node/service/Cargo.toml
View file @
7754c036
...
...
@@ -141,7 +141,3 @@ real-overseer = [
"polkadot-statement-distribution"
,
"polkadot-approval-distribution"
,
]
approval-checking
=
[
"real-overseer"
]
node/service/src/grandpa_support.rs
View file @
7754c036
...
...
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ use sp_runtime::traits::{Block as BlockT, NumberFor};
use
sp_runtime
::
generic
::
BlockId
;
use
sp_runtime
::
traits
::
Header
as
_
;
#[cfg(feature
=
"
approval-checking
"
)]
#[cfg(feature
=
"
real-overseer
"
)]
use
{
polkadot_primitives
::
v1
::{
Block
as
PolkadotBlock
,
Header
as
PolkadotHeader
,
BlockNumber
},
polkadot_subsystem
::
messages
::
ApprovalVotingMessage
,
...
...
@@ -39,14 +39,14 @@ use {
/// The practical effect of this voting rule is to implement a fixed delay of
/// blocks and to issue a prometheus metric on the lag behind the head that
/// approval checking would indicate.
#[cfg(feature
=
"
approval-checking
"
)]
#[cfg(feature
=
"
real-overseer
"
)]
#[derive(Clone)]
pub
(
crate
)
struct
ApprovalCheckingDiagnostic
{
checking_lag
:
Option
<
prometheus_endpoint
::
Histogram
>
,
overseer
:
OverseerHandler
,
}
#[cfg(feature
=
"
approval-checking
"
)]
#[cfg(feature
=
"
real-overseer
"
)]
impl
ApprovalCheckingDiagnostic
{
/// Create a new approval checking diagnostic voting rule.
pub
fn
new
(
overseer
:
OverseerHandler
,
registry
:
Option
<&
Registry
>
)
...
...
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ impl ApprovalCheckingDiagnostic {
}
}
#[cfg(feature
=
"
approval-checking
"
)]
#[cfg(feature
=
"
real-overseer
"
)]
impl
<
B
>
grandpa
::
VotingRule
<
PolkadotBlock
,
B
>
for
ApprovalCheckingDiagnostic
where
B
:
sp_blockchain
::
HeaderBackend
<
PolkadotBlock
>
{
...
...
node/service/src/lib.rs
View file @
7754c036
...
...
@@ -418,10 +418,10 @@ where
use
polkadot_availability_recovery
::
AvailabilityRecoverySubsystem
;
use
polkadot_approval_distribution
::
ApprovalDistribution
as
ApprovalDistributionSubsystem
;
#[cfg(feature
=
"
approval-checking
"
)]
#[cfg(feature
=
"
real-overseer
"
)]
use
polkadot_node_core_approval_voting
::
ApprovalVotingSubsystem
;
#[cfg(not(feature
=
"
approval-checking
"
))]
#[cfg(not(feature
=
"
real-overseer
"
))]
let
_
=
approval_voting_config
;
// silence.
let
all_subsystems
=
AllSubsystems
{
...
...
@@ -498,12 +498,12 @@ where
approval_distribution
:
ApprovalDistributionSubsystem
::
new
(
Metrics
::
register
(
registry
)
?
,
),
#[cfg(feature
=
"
approval-checking
"
)]
#[cfg(feature
=
"
real-overseer
"
)]
approval_voting
:
ApprovalVotingSubsystem
::
with_config
(
approval_voting_config
,
keystore
.clone
(),
)
?
,
#[cfg(not(feature
=
"
approval-checking
"
))]
#[cfg(not(feature
=
"
real-overseer
"
))]
approval_voting
:
polkadot_subsystem
::
DummySubsystem
,
};
...
...
@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ pub fn new_full<RuntimeApi, Executor>(
// given delay.
let
builder
=
grandpa
::
VotingRulesBuilder
::
default
();
#[cfg(feature
=
"
approval-checking
"
)]
#[cfg(feature
=
"
real-overseer
"
)]
let
builder
=
if
let
Some
(
ref
overseer
)
=
overseer_handler
{
builder
.add
(
grandpa_support
::
ApprovalCheckingDiagnostic
::
new
(
overseer
.clone
(),
...
...
Write
Preview
Supports
Markdown
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment