Newer
Older
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
// Copyright 2020 Parity Technologies (UK) Ltd.
// This file is part of Polkadot.
// Polkadot is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
// it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
// the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
// (at your option) any later version.
// Polkadot is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
// GNU General Public License for more details.
// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
// along with Polkadot. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
//! [`ApprovalDistributionSubsystem`] implementation.
//!
//! https://w3f.github.io/parachain-implementers-guide/node/approval/approval-distribution.html
#![warn(missing_docs)]
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests;
use std::collections::{BTreeMap, HashMap, HashSet, hash_map};
use futures::{channel::oneshot, FutureExt as _};
use polkadot_primitives::v1::{
Hash, BlockNumber, ValidatorIndex, ValidatorSignature, CandidateIndex,
};
use polkadot_node_primitives::{
approval::{AssignmentCert, BlockApprovalMeta, IndirectSignedApprovalVote, IndirectAssignmentCert},
};
use polkadot_node_subsystem::{
messages::{
AllMessages, ApprovalDistributionMessage, ApprovalVotingMessage, NetworkBridgeMessage,
AssignmentCheckResult, ApprovalCheckResult, NetworkBridgeEvent,
},
ActiveLeavesUpdate, FromOverseer, OverseerSignal, SpawnedSubsystem, Subsystem, SubsystemContext,
};
use polkadot_node_subsystem_util::metrics::{self, prometheus};
use polkadot_node_network_protocol::{
PeerId, View, v1 as protocol_v1, UnifiedReputationChange as Rep,
const LOG_TARGET: &str = "parachain::approval-distribution";
const COST_UNEXPECTED_MESSAGE: Rep = Rep::CostMinor("Peer sent an out-of-view assignment or approval");
const COST_DUPLICATE_MESSAGE: Rep = Rep::CostMinorRepeated("Peer sent identical messages");
const COST_ASSIGNMENT_TOO_FAR_IN_THE_FUTURE: Rep = Rep::CostMinor("The vote was valid but too far in the future");
const COST_INVALID_MESSAGE: Rep = Rep::CostMajor("The vote was bad");
const BENEFIT_VALID_MESSAGE: Rep = Rep::BenefitMinor("Peer sent a valid message");
const BENEFIT_VALID_MESSAGE_FIRST: Rep = Rep::BenefitMinorFirst("Valid message with new information");
/// The Approval Distribution subsystem.
pub struct ApprovalDistribution {
metrics: Metrics,
}
/// The [`State`] struct is responsible for tracking the overall state of the subsystem.
///
/// It tracks metadata about our view of the unfinalized chain,
/// which assignments and approvals we have seen, and our peers' views.
#[derive(Default)]
struct State {
/// These two fields are used in conjunction to construct a view over the unfinalized chain.
blocks_by_number: BTreeMap<BlockNumber, Vec<Hash>>,
blocks: HashMap<Hash, BlockEntry>,
/// Our view updates to our peers can race with `NewBlocks` updates. We store messages received
/// against the directly mentioned blocks in our view in this map until `NewBlocks` is received.
///
/// As long as the parent is already in the `blocks` map and `NewBlocks` messages aren't delayed
/// by more than a block length, this strategy will work well for mitigating the race. This is
/// also a race that occurs typically on local networks.
pending_known: HashMap<Hash, Vec<(PeerId, PendingMessage)>>,
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
/// Peer view data is partially stored here, and partially inline within the [`BlockEntry`]s
peer_views: HashMap<PeerId, View>,
}
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Hash, PartialEq, Eq)]
enum MessageFingerprint {
Assignment(Hash, CandidateIndex, ValidatorIndex),
Approval(Hash, CandidateIndex, ValidatorIndex),
}
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Default)]
struct Knowledge {
known_messages: HashSet<MessageFingerprint>,
}
/// Information about blocks in our current view as well as whether peers know of them.
struct BlockEntry {
/// Peers who we know are aware of this block and thus, the candidates within it.
/// This maps to their knowledge of messages.
known_by: HashMap<PeerId, Knowledge>,
/// The number of the block.
number: BlockNumber,
/// The parent hash of the block.
parent_hash: Hash,
/// Our knowledge of messages.
knowledge: Knowledge,
/// A votes entry for each candidate indexed by [`CandidateIndex`].
candidates: Vec<CandidateEntry>,
}
#[derive(Debug)]
enum ApprovalState {
Assigned(AssignmentCert),
Approved(AssignmentCert, ValidatorSignature),
}
/// Information about candidates in the context of a particular block they are included in.
/// In other words, multiple `CandidateEntry`s may exist for the same candidate,
/// if it is included by multiple blocks - this is likely the case when there are forks.
#[derive(Debug, Default)]
struct CandidateEntry {
approvals: HashMap<ValidatorIndex, ApprovalState>,
}
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
enum MessageSource {
Peer(PeerId),
Local,
}
impl MessageSource {
fn peer_id(&self) -> Option<PeerId> {
match self {
Self::Peer(id) => Some(id.clone()),
Self::Local => None,
}
}
}
enum PendingMessage {
Assignment(IndirectAssignmentCert, CandidateIndex),
Approval(IndirectSignedApprovalVote),
}
impl State {
async fn handle_network_msg(
&mut self,
ctx: &mut impl SubsystemContext<Message = ApprovalDistributionMessage>,
metrics: &Metrics,
event: NetworkBridgeEvent<protocol_v1::ApprovalDistributionMessage>,
) {
match event {
NetworkBridgeEvent::PeerConnected(peer_id, role) => {
// insert a blank view if none already present
tracing::trace!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
?peer_id,
?role,
"Peer connected",
);
self.peer_views.entry(peer_id).or_default();
}
NetworkBridgeEvent::PeerDisconnected(peer_id) => {
tracing::trace!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
?peer_id,
"Peer disconnected",
);
self.peer_views.remove(&peer_id);
self.blocks.iter_mut().for_each(|(_hash, entry)| {
entry.known_by.remove(&peer_id);
})
}
NetworkBridgeEvent::PeerViewChange(peer_id, view) => {
self.handle_peer_view_change(ctx, peer_id, view).await;
}
NetworkBridgeEvent::OurViewChange(view) => {
tracing::trace!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
?view,
"Own view change",
);
for head in view.iter() {
if !self.blocks.contains_key(head) {
self.pending_known.entry(*head).or_default();
}
}
self.pending_known.retain(|h, _| view.contains(h));
}
NetworkBridgeEvent::PeerMessage(peer_id, msg) => {
self.process_incoming_peer_message(ctx, metrics, peer_id, msg).await;
}
}
}
async fn handle_new_blocks(
&mut self,
ctx: &mut impl SubsystemContext<Message = ApprovalDistributionMessage>,
metas: Vec<BlockApprovalMeta>,
) {
let mut new_hashes = HashSet::new();
match self.blocks.entry(meta.hash.clone()) {
hash_map::Entry::Vacant(entry) => {
let candidates_count = meta.candidates.len();
let mut candidates = Vec::with_capacity(candidates_count);
candidates.resize_with(candidates_count, Default::default);
entry.insert(BlockEntry {
known_by: HashMap::new(),
number: meta.number,
parent_hash: meta.parent_hash.clone(),
knowledge: Knowledge::default(),
candidates,
});
new_hashes.insert(meta.hash.clone());
}
_ => continue,
}
self.blocks_by_number.entry(meta.number).or_default().push(meta.hash);
}
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
tracing::debug!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
"Got new blocks {:?}",
metas.iter().map(|m| (m.hash, m.number)).collect::<Vec<_>>(),
);
{
let pending_now_known = self.pending_known.keys()
.filter(|k| self.blocks.contains_key(k))
.copied()
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
let to_import = pending_now_known.into_iter()
.filter_map(|k| self.pending_known.remove(&k))
.flatten()
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
for (peer_id, message) in to_import {
match message {
PendingMessage::Assignment(assignment, claimed_index) => {
self.import_and_circulate_assignment(
ctx,
metrics,
MessageSource::Peer(peer_id),
assignment,
claimed_index,
).await;
}
PendingMessage::Approval(approval_vote) => {
self.import_and_circulate_approval(
ctx,
metrics,
MessageSource::Peer(peer_id),
approval_vote,
).await;
}
}
}
}
for (peer_id, view) in self.peer_views.iter() {
let intersection = view.iter().filter(|h| new_hashes.contains(h));
let view_intersection = View::new(
intersection.cloned(),
view.finalized_number,
);
Self::unify_with_peer(
&mut self.blocks,
ctx,
peer_id.clone(),
view_intersection,
).await;
}
}
async fn process_incoming_peer_message(
&mut self,
ctx: &mut impl SubsystemContext<Message = ApprovalDistributionMessage>,
metrics: &Metrics,
peer_id: PeerId,
msg: protocol_v1::ApprovalDistributionMessage,
) {
match msg {
protocol_v1::ApprovalDistributionMessage::Assignments(assignments) => {
tracing::trace!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
peer_id = %peer_id,
num = assignments.len(),
"Processing assignments from a peer",
);
for (assignment, claimed_index) in assignments.into_iter() {
if let Some(pending) = self.pending_known.get_mut(&assignment.block_hash) {
pending.push((
peer_id.clone(),
PendingMessage::Assignment(assignment, claimed_index),
));
continue;
}
self.import_and_circulate_assignment(
ctx,
metrics,
MessageSource::Peer(peer_id.clone()),
assignment,
claimed_index,
).await;
}
}
protocol_v1::ApprovalDistributionMessage::Approvals(approvals) => {
tracing::trace!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
peer_id = %peer_id,
num = approvals.len(),
"Processing approvals from a peer",
);
for approval_vote in approvals.into_iter() {
if let Some(pending) = self.pending_known.get_mut(&approval_vote.block_hash) {
pending.push((
peer_id.clone(),
PendingMessage::Approval(approval_vote),
));
continue;
}
self.import_and_circulate_approval(
ctx,
metrics,
MessageSource::Peer(peer_id.clone()),
approval_vote,
).await;
}
}
}
}
async fn handle_peer_view_change(
&mut self,
ctx: &mut impl SubsystemContext<Message = ApprovalDistributionMessage>,
peer_id: PeerId,
view: View,
) {
tracing::trace!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
?view,
"Peer view change",
);
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
Self::unify_with_peer(&mut self.blocks, ctx, peer_id.clone(), view.clone()).await;
let finalized_number = view.finalized_number;
let old_view = self.peer_views.insert(peer_id.clone(), view);
let old_finalized_number = old_view.map(|v| v.finalized_number).unwrap_or(0);
// we want to prune every block known_by peer up to (including) view.finalized_number
let blocks = &mut self.blocks;
// the `BTreeMap::range` is constrained by stored keys
// so the loop won't take ages if the new finalized_number skyrockets
// but we need to make sure the range is not empty, otherwise it will panic
// it shouldn't be, we make sure of this in the network bridge
let range = old_finalized_number..=finalized_number;
if !range.is_empty() {
self.blocks_by_number
.range(range)
.map(|(_number, hashes)| hashes)
.flatten()
.for_each(|hash| {
if let Some(entry) = blocks.get_mut(hash) {
entry.known_by.remove(&peer_id);
}
});
}
}
fn handle_block_finalized(
&mut self,
finalized_number: BlockNumber,
) {
// we want to prune every block up to (including) finalized_number
// why +1 here?
// split_off returns everything after the given key, including the key
let split_point = finalized_number.saturating_add(1);
let mut old_blocks = self.blocks_by_number.split_off(&split_point);
// after split_off old_blocks actually contains new blocks, we need to swap
std::mem::swap(&mut self.blocks_by_number, &mut old_blocks);
// now that we pruned `self.blocks_by_number`, let's clean up `self.blocks` too
old_blocks.values()
.flatten()
.for_each(|h| {
self.blocks.remove(h);
});
}
async fn import_and_circulate_assignment(
&mut self,
ctx: &mut impl SubsystemContext<Message = ApprovalDistributionMessage>,
metrics: &Metrics,
source: MessageSource,
assignment: IndirectAssignmentCert,
claimed_candidate_index: CandidateIndex,
) {
let block_hash = assignment.block_hash.clone();
let validator_index = assignment.validator;
let entry = match self.blocks.get_mut(&block_hash) {
Some(entry) => entry,
None => {
if let Some(peer_id) = source.peer_id() {
tracing::debug!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
?source,
?peer_id,
?block_hash,
?validator_index,
"Unexpected assignment",
);
modify_reputation(ctx, peer_id, COST_UNEXPECTED_MESSAGE).await;
}
return;
}
};
// compute a fingerprint of the assignment
let fingerprint = MessageFingerprint::Assignment(
block_hash,
claimed_candidate_index,
validator_index,
);
if let Some(peer_id) = source.peer_id() {
// check if our knowledge of the peer already contains this assignment
match entry.known_by.entry(peer_id.clone()) {
hash_map::Entry::Occupied(knowledge) => {
if knowledge.get().known_messages.contains(&fingerprint) {
tracing::debug!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
?source,
?peer_id,
?fingerprint,
"Duplicate assignment",
);
modify_reputation(ctx, peer_id, COST_DUPLICATE_MESSAGE).await;
return;
}
}
hash_map::Entry::Vacant(_) => {
tracing::debug!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
?source,
?peer_id,
?fingerprint,
"Assignment from unknown peer",
);
modify_reputation(ctx, peer_id.clone(), COST_UNEXPECTED_MESSAGE).await;
}
}
// if the assignment is known to be valid, reward the peer
if entry.knowledge.known_messages.contains(&fingerprint) {
modify_reputation(ctx, peer_id.clone(), BENEFIT_VALID_MESSAGE).await;
if let Some(peer_knowledge) = entry.known_by.get_mut(&peer_id) {
tracing::trace!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
?source,
?peer_id,
?fingerprint,
"Known assignment",
);
peer_knowledge.known_messages.insert(fingerprint.clone());
}
return;
}
let (tx, rx) = oneshot::channel();
ctx.send_message(AllMessages::ApprovalVoting(ApprovalVotingMessage::CheckAndImportAssignment(
assignment.clone(),
tx,
))).await;
let result = match rx.await {
Ok(result) => result,
Err(_) => {
tracing::debug!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
"The approval voting subsystem is down",
);
return;
}
};
tracing::trace!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
?source,
?peer_id,
?fingerprint,
?result,
"Checked assignment",
);
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
match result {
AssignmentCheckResult::Accepted => {
modify_reputation(ctx, peer_id.clone(), BENEFIT_VALID_MESSAGE_FIRST).await;
entry.knowledge.known_messages.insert(fingerprint.clone());
if let Some(peer_knowledge) = entry.known_by.get_mut(&peer_id) {
peer_knowledge.known_messages.insert(fingerprint.clone());
}
}
AssignmentCheckResult::AcceptedDuplicate => {
// "duplicate" assignments aren't necessarily equal.
// There is more than one way each validator can be assigned to each core.
// cf. https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/2160#discussion_r557628699
if let Some(peer_knowledge) = entry.known_by.get_mut(&peer_id) {
peer_knowledge.known_messages.insert(fingerprint);
}
return;
}
AssignmentCheckResult::TooFarInFuture => {
modify_reputation(ctx, peer_id, COST_ASSIGNMENT_TOO_FAR_IN_THE_FUTURE).await;
return;
}
AssignmentCheckResult::Bad => {
modify_reputation(ctx, peer_id, COST_INVALID_MESSAGE).await;
return;
}
}
} else {
if !entry.knowledge.known_messages.insert(fingerprint.clone()) {
// if we already imported an assignment, there is no need to distribute it again
return;
}
}
// Invariant: none of the peers except for the `source` know about the assignment.
metrics.on_assignment_imported();
match entry.candidates.get_mut(claimed_candidate_index as usize) {
Some(candidate_entry) => {
// set the approval state for validator_index to Assigned
// unless the approval state is set already
candidate_entry.approvals
.entry(validator_index)
.or_insert_with(|| ApprovalState::Assigned(assignment.cert.clone()));
}
None => {
tracing::warn!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
hash = ?block_hash,
?claimed_candidate_index,
"Expected a candidate entry on import_and_circulate_assignment",
);
}
}
// Dispatch a ApprovalDistributionV1Message::Assignment(assignment, candidate_index)
// to all peers in the BlockEntry's known_by set who know about the block,
// excluding the peer in the source, if source has kind MessageSource::Peer.
let maybe_peer_id = source.peer_id();
let peers = entry
.known_by
.keys()
.cloned()
.filter(|key| maybe_peer_id.as_ref().map_or(true, |id| id != key))
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
let assignments = vec![(assignment, claimed_candidate_index)];
// Add the fingerprint of the assignment to the knowledge of each peer.
for peer in peers.iter() {
// we already filtered peers above, so this should always be Some
if let Some(entry) = entry.known_by.get_mut(peer) {
entry.known_messages.insert(fingerprint.clone());
}
}
if !peers.is_empty() {
tracing::trace!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
"Sending assignment (block={}, index={})to {} peers",
block_hash,
claimed_candidate_index,
peers.len(),
);
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
ctx.send_message(NetworkBridgeMessage::SendValidationMessage(
peers,
protocol_v1::ValidationProtocol::ApprovalDistribution(
protocol_v1::ApprovalDistributionMessage::Assignments(assignments)
),
).into()).await;
}
}
async fn import_and_circulate_approval(
&mut self,
ctx: &mut impl SubsystemContext<Message = ApprovalDistributionMessage>,
metrics: &Metrics,
source: MessageSource,
vote: IndirectSignedApprovalVote,
) {
let block_hash = vote.block_hash.clone();
let validator_index = vote.validator;
let candidate_index = vote.candidate_index;
let entry = match self.blocks.get_mut(&block_hash) {
Some(entry) if entry.candidates.get(candidate_index as usize).is_some() => entry,
_ => {
if let Some(peer_id) = source.peer_id() {
modify_reputation(ctx, peer_id, COST_UNEXPECTED_MESSAGE).await;
}
return;
}
};
// compute a fingerprint of the approval
let fingerprint = MessageFingerprint::Approval(
block_hash.clone(),
candidate_index,
validator_index,
);
if let Some(peer_id) = source.peer_id() {
let assignment_fingerprint = MessageFingerprint::Assignment(
block_hash.clone(),
candidate_index,
validator_index,
);
if !entry.knowledge.known_messages.contains(&assignment_fingerprint) {
tracing::debug!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
?source,
?peer_id,
?fingerprint,
"Unknown approval assignment",
);
modify_reputation(ctx, peer_id, COST_UNEXPECTED_MESSAGE).await;
return;
}
// check if our knowledge of the peer already contains this approval
match entry.known_by.entry(peer_id.clone()) {
hash_map::Entry::Occupied(knowledge) => {
tracing::debug!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
?source,
?peer_id,
?fingerprint,
"Duplicate approval",
);
if knowledge.get().known_messages.contains(&fingerprint) {
modify_reputation(ctx, peer_id, COST_DUPLICATE_MESSAGE).await;
return;
}
}
hash_map::Entry::Vacant(_) => {
tracing::debug!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
?source,
?peer_id,
?fingerprint,
"Approval from unknown peer",
);
modify_reputation(ctx, peer_id.clone(), COST_UNEXPECTED_MESSAGE).await;
}
}
// if the approval is known to be valid, reward the peer
if entry.knowledge.known_messages.contains(&fingerprint) {
tracing::trace!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
?source,
?peer_id,
?fingerprint,
"Known approval",
);
modify_reputation(ctx, peer_id.clone(), BENEFIT_VALID_MESSAGE).await;
if let Some(peer_knowledge) = entry.known_by.get_mut(&peer_id) {
peer_knowledge.known_messages.insert(fingerprint.clone());
}
return;
}
let (tx, rx) = oneshot::channel();
ctx.send_message(AllMessages::ApprovalVoting(ApprovalVotingMessage::CheckAndImportApproval(
vote.clone(),
tx,
))).await;
let result = match rx.await {
Ok(result) => result,
Err(_) => {
tracing::debug!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
"The approval voting subsystem is down",
);
return;
}
};
tracing::trace!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
?source,
?peer_id,
?fingerprint,
?result,
"Checked approval",
);
match result {
ApprovalCheckResult::Accepted => {
modify_reputation(ctx, peer_id.clone(), BENEFIT_VALID_MESSAGE_FIRST).await;
entry.knowledge.known_messages.insert(fingerprint.clone());
if let Some(peer_knowledge) = entry.known_by.get_mut(&peer_id) {
peer_knowledge.known_messages.insert(fingerprint.clone());
}
}
ApprovalCheckResult::Bad => {
modify_reputation(ctx, peer_id, COST_INVALID_MESSAGE).await;
tracing::info!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
"Got a bad approval from peer",
);
return;
}
}
} else {
if !entry.knowledge.known_messages.insert(fingerprint.clone()) {
// if we already imported an approval, there is no need to distribute it again
return;
}
}
// Invariant: none of the peers except for the `source` know about the approval.
metrics.on_approval_imported();
match entry.candidates.get_mut(candidate_index as usize) {
Some(candidate_entry) => {
// set the approval state for validator_index to Approved
// it should be in assigned state already
match candidate_entry.approvals.remove(&validator_index) {
Some(ApprovalState::Assigned(cert)) => {
candidate_entry.approvals.insert(
validator_index,
ApprovalState::Approved(cert, vote.signature.clone()),
);
}
_ => {
tracing::warn!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
hash = ?block_hash,
?candidate_index,
"Expected a candidate entry with `ApprovalState::Assigned`",
);
}
}
}
None => {
tracing::warn!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
hash = ?block_hash,
?candidate_index,
"Expected a candidate entry on import_and_circulate_approval",
);
}
}
// Dispatch a ApprovalDistributionV1Message::Approval(vote)
// to all peers in the BlockEntry's known_by set who know about the block,
// excluding the peer in the source, if source has kind MessageSource::Peer.
let maybe_peer_id = source.peer_id();
let peers = entry
.known_by
.keys()
.cloned()
.filter(|key| maybe_peer_id.as_ref().map_or(true, |id| id != key))
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
// Add the fingerprint of the assignment to the knowledge of each peer.
for peer in peers.iter() {
// we already filtered peers above, so this should always be Some
if let Some(entry) = entry.known_by.get_mut(peer) {
entry.known_messages.insert(fingerprint.clone());
}
}
let approvals = vec![vote];
if !peers.is_empty() {
tracing::trace!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
"Sending approval (block={}, index={}) to {} peers",
block_hash,
candidate_index,
peers.len(),
);
ctx.send_message(NetworkBridgeMessage::SendValidationMessage(
peers,
protocol_v1::ValidationProtocol::ApprovalDistribution(
protocol_v1::ApprovalDistributionMessage::Approvals(approvals)
),
).into()).await;
}
}
async fn unify_with_peer(
entries: &mut HashMap<Hash, BlockEntry>,
ctx: &mut impl SubsystemContext<Message = ApprovalDistributionMessage>,
peer_id: PeerId,
view: View,
) {
let mut to_send = HashSet::new();
let view_finalized_number = view.finalized_number;
for head in view.into_iter() {
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
let mut block = head;
let interesting_blocks = std::iter::from_fn(|| {
// step 2.
let entry = match entries.get_mut(&block) {
Some(entry) if entry.number > view_finalized_number => entry,
_ => return None,
};
let interesting_block = match entry.known_by.entry(peer_id.clone()) {
// step 3.
hash_map::Entry::Occupied(_) => return None,
// step 4.
hash_map::Entry::Vacant(vacant) => {
vacant.insert(entry.knowledge.clone());
block
}
};
// step 5.
block = entry.parent_hash.clone();
Some(interesting_block)
});
to_send.extend(interesting_blocks);
}
// step 6.
// send all assignments and approvals for all candidates in those blocks to the peer
Self::send_gossip_messages_to_peer(
entries,
ctx,
peer_id,
to_send
).await;
}
async fn send_gossip_messages_to_peer(
entries: &HashMap<Hash, BlockEntry>,
ctx: &mut impl SubsystemContext<Message = ApprovalDistributionMessage>,
peer_id: PeerId,
blocks: HashSet<Hash>,
) {
let mut assignments = Vec::new();
let mut approvals = Vec::new();
for block in blocks.into_iter() {
let entry = match entries.get(&block) {
Some(entry) => entry,
None => continue, // should be unreachable
};
tracing::trace!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
"Sending all assignments and approvals in block {} to peer {}",
block,
peer_id,
);
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
for (candidate_index, candidate_entry) in entry.candidates.iter().enumerate() {
let candidate_index = candidate_index as u32;
for (validator_index, approval_state) in candidate_entry.approvals.iter() {
match approval_state {
ApprovalState::Assigned(cert) => {
assignments.push((IndirectAssignmentCert {
block_hash: block.clone(),
validator: validator_index.clone(),
cert: cert.clone(),
}, candidate_index.clone()));
}
ApprovalState::Approved(_, signature) => {
approvals.push(IndirectSignedApprovalVote {
block_hash: block.clone(),
validator: validator_index.clone(),
candidate_index: candidate_index.clone(),
signature: signature.clone(),
});
}
}
}
}
}
if !assignments.is_empty() {
ctx.send_message(NetworkBridgeMessage::SendValidationMessage(
vec![peer_id.clone()],
protocol_v1::ValidationProtocol::ApprovalDistribution(
protocol_v1::ApprovalDistributionMessage::Assignments(assignments)
),
).into()).await;
}
if !approvals.is_empty() {
ctx.send_message(NetworkBridgeMessage::SendValidationMessage(
vec![peer_id],
protocol_v1::ValidationProtocol::ApprovalDistribution(
protocol_v1::ApprovalDistributionMessage::Approvals(approvals)
),
).into()).await;
}
}
}
/// Modify the reputation of a peer based on its behavior.
#[tracing::instrument(level = "trace", skip(ctx), fields(subsystem = LOG_TARGET))]
async fn modify_reputation(
ctx: &mut impl SubsystemContext<Message = ApprovalDistributionMessage>,
peer_id: PeerId,
rep: Rep,
) {
tracing::trace!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
reputation = ?rep,
?peer_id,
"Reputation change for peer",
);
ctx.send_message(AllMessages::NetworkBridge(
NetworkBridgeMessage::ReportPeer(peer_id, rep),
)).await;
}
impl ApprovalDistribution {
/// Create a new instance of the [`ApprovalDistribution`] subsystem.
pub fn new(metrics: Metrics) -> Self {
Self { metrics }
}
#[tracing::instrument(skip(self, ctx), fields(subsystem = LOG_TARGET))]
async fn run<Context>(self, ctx: Context)
where
Context: SubsystemContext<Message = ApprovalDistributionMessage>,
{
let mut state = State::default();
self.run_inner(ctx, &mut state).await
}
/// Used for testing.
#[tracing::instrument(skip(self, ctx, state), fields(subsystem = LOG_TARGET))]
async fn run_inner<Context>(self, mut ctx: Context, state: &mut State)
where
Context: SubsystemContext<Message = ApprovalDistributionMessage>,
{
loop {
let message = match ctx.recv().await {
Ok(message) => message,
Err(e) => {
tracing::debug!(target: LOG_TARGET, err = ?e, "Failed to receive a message from Overseer, exiting");
return;
},
};
match message {
FromOverseer::Communication {
msg: ApprovalDistributionMessage::NetworkBridgeUpdateV1(event),
} => {
state.handle_network_msg(&mut ctx, &self.metrics, event).await;
}
FromOverseer::Communication {
msg: ApprovalDistributionMessage::NewBlocks(metas),
} => {
tracing::debug!(target: LOG_TARGET, "Processing NewBlocks");
state.handle_new_blocks(&mut ctx, &self.metrics, metas).await;
}
FromOverseer::Communication {
msg: ApprovalDistributionMessage::DistributeAssignment(cert, candidate_index),
} => {
tracing::debug!(
target: LOG_TARGET,
"Distributing our assignment on candidate (block={}, index={})",
cert.block_hash,
candidate_index,
);
state.import_and_circulate_assignment(
&mut ctx,
&self.metrics,
MessageSource::Local,
cert,
candidate_index,
).await;
}
FromOverseer::Communication {
msg: ApprovalDistributionMessage::DistributeApproval(vote),